| Review Type |
Outcome |
Est. Completion Date |
Completed |
|
Engineering Traffic Review
|
Failed
|
11/19/2025
|
11/19/2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
Awaiting final correction to the gate agreement, otherwise the permit is approveable for Traffic.
|
|
Fire Review
|
Failed
|
11/19/2025
|
11/14/2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
1. Provided the existing access does not change and the parcel only provides parking and access through the warehouse complex and not valley, there will be no other requires for access.
2. If electronic gates are used, you will be required to provide KNOX manual override with battery backup. You may be required to use OPTICOM or an equivalent system.
3. The gate on Valley will be required to set back 45' to meet fire and traffic queuing requirements. This is a nonnegotiable number for the length of our fire trucks to safely pull out of traffic to unlock and lock the gate.
4. Gates must swing into property and not out towards Valley.
5. Provide a layout for parking.
|
|
Planning Review
|
Failed
|
11/19/2025
|
11/07/2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Please add a notation that identifies the proposed height of the fence and gate at the connection between the two parcels.
See CIVIL PLANS SET, sheet 4 of 4.
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Make a new landscaping space on the west side of the parcel that is an equivalent square footage to the removed landscaping in the proposed driveway.
Replace (3) trees and other vegetation like-for-like in newly created landscape area.
See LANDSCAPE PLANS, Sheet 1 of 2.
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Please clarify the intended use for the two bold sections near the entrance on the east side of the site.
The "CIVIL PLANS SET" (sheet 1 of 4) identifies this space as "new landscape area", while the landscape plan identifies this space as asphalt.
See LANDSCAPE PLANS, sheet 1 of 2.
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Any landscaping to be removed and replaced on the west side of the parcel shall be replaced on the same side, rather than replaced elsewhere on the site.
See LANDSCAPE PLANS, sheet 1 of 2.
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Please refer to page 44 of the VMS (Vegetation Management Standards) for parking lot light pole standards.
Per 14.4, Type IV: Parking Lot Landscaping, Type IV Design Standards (E): "Internal parking lot lighting poles and fixtures shall be located to minimize future conflicts with parking lot trees -- parking lot lights shall be placed 10' from any parking lot tree required under the type IV standard."
See LANDSCAPE PLANS, sheet 1 of 2.
|
|
Engineering Civil Review
|
Failed
|
11/19/2025
|
11/03/2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add Existing Utilities to this sheet.
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Call out maximum allowable cut slope (2:1 or less if preferred or recommended by geotech).
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide lighting layout and confirm there are not conflicts between footing and existing utilities such as the infiltration gallery.
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Silt fence does not work on pavement. Provide alternative equal (BMP C208 triangular silt dike or similar that can be used on pavement)
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Confirm callout is for construction access and revise accordingly.
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Construction entrance is not in legend or on plans. This does not need to be quarry spalls since the site disturbance is minimal and trucks will likely not be traveling on disturbed areas.
|
|
|
See Document Markup
A lease agreement will be needed to allow access for Parcel A onto Parcel B. It should include permission to release stormwater runoff from new surfaces on Parcel B to flow to Parcel A and restoration conditions at the time the agreement ends.
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Where is the existing biopod filter that is mentioned in the storm report?
|
|
|
See Document Markup
What direction does the existing pavement slope? Provide slope arrows and grades to clarify there are no drainage implications to removing the curb from this site.
|
|
|
See Document Markup
The downstream path is not clear. Provide an exhibit showing the downstream path that shows the biopod filter catch basin mentioned. Since there are two parcels involved, the narrative needs to be clear which parcel the new runoff flows to and how it is being mitigated.
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide documentation showing Pro Shops' system can handle the additional runoff and any runon from the existing contractor yard.
|
|
|
Add Submittal Item: Misc
Additional Submittal Item Required: Submit a draft of an Easement with an agreement for "Lot A" Bass Pro to access "Lot B" and a reciprocal agreement that allows for stormwater runoff from Lot B to flow to Lot A. The access easement can be conditioned to end at the time of lease termination, but the storm runoff must be allowed to continue unless provisions are provided to require the physical removal of the access back to pre-lease conditions. [Lance Hollingsworth @ 10/28/2025 9:47 AM]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Use unaltered cost estimate. I can help you print to pdf the entire workbook if needed.
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add erosion control using disturbed area, rough grading using the cut/fill quantities, parking lot lights (this can either be street lights or misc item add-in), and private utility trenching for the parking lot power.
|
|
Public Works Streets Review
|
VOID
|
11/19/2025
|
10/28/2025
|
|
|
|
|
Public Works Collection Review
|
Approved
|
11/19/2025
|
10/27/2025
|
|
|
|
|
Public Works Water Review
|
Approved
|
11/19/2025
|
10/23/2025
|
|
|
|
|
Traffic Completeness Check
|
Incomplete
|
09/29/2025
|
09/23/2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
Provide a document nullifying the existing gate agreement. This document should provide a signature block for the property owner and the City's Developement and Permitting Services Manager.
Provide a document agreeing to the closure of the Valley Ave access gate, which requires the access to remain closed at all times, secured with a knox box for emergency vehicle access only.
Add a note to the civil plan set referencing the agreement on file with the City which prohibits the use of the access gate on Valley Ave.
|
|
Engineering Civil/Storm Completeness Check
|
Incomplete
|
09/29/2025
|
09/19/2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
Civil Plans Missing the following requirement items for review:
• Drainage control plan with standard city notes. The report mentions where runoff will be going, but the mentioned design is not provided in the plans.
• existing and proposed topography
• disturbed area table
• Existing and proposed utilities in civil set
• zoning labels for project parcels and adjacent parcels
• Lot sizes
• Existing and proposed easements
• City general plan notes
• Construction sequence
• Cut/Fill quantities
• Lot perimeter labels and street labels missing form most plan view sheets
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
Storm Report:
Adjust stormwater report to reflect Ecology’s 2019 stormwater Manual.
MR 5 incomplete Not all list 1 BMPs were considered. Missing rain gardens, bioretention, and concentrated sheet flow.
The narrative for what is proposed appears incomplete. The plans and an exhibit show asphalt removed for landscape, but there is no narrative describing this or how much is being removed. I am assuming the intent is no net increase in PGHS on the existing storm system?
|
|
Building Completeness Check
|
VOID
|
09/29/2025
|
09/15/2025
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Civil Review
|
Pending
|
03/31/2026
|
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Traffic Review
|
Pending
|
03/31/2026
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fire Review
|
Pending
|
03/31/2026
|
|
|
|
|
|
Planning Review
|
Pending
|
03/31/2026
|
|
|
|
|
|
Public Works Collection Review
|
Pending
|
03/31/2026
|
|
|
|
|
|
Public Works Streets Review
|
Pending
|
03/31/2026
|
|
|
|
|
|
Public Works Water Review
|
Pending
|
03/31/2026
|
|
|
|
|