CITY OF PUYALLUP PERMITTING PORTAL

Other/Miscellaneous

Permits and occupancy are subject to maintaining compliance with codes and standards adopted by the State of Washington

See Document Markup

Correct to 10 [Planning comment, DA Draft, page 2]

See Document Markup

There are two Exhibit B attachments; please distinguish (add Exhibit C, if necessary) [Planning comment, DA Draft, page 2]

See Document Markup

Correct to two legal lots [Planning comment, DA Draft, page 2]

See Document Markup

This may need to be corrected to Exhibit C [Planning comment, DA Draft, page 3]

See Document Markup

Existing and proposed building square footages shall be included, in section C or a new section. [Planning comment, DA Draft, page 3]

See Document Markup

Add item 8) 2000 sf tractor storage Option #1, as shown on site plan. [Planning comment, DA Draft, page 2]

See Document Markup

Need analysis of new uses and their traffic generation, and how this relates to the previously vested trip amount. [Planning comment, DA Draft, page 3]

See Document Markup

This may need to be corrected to Exhibit C. [Planning comment, DA Draft, page 4]

See Document Markup

Provide required parking count based on new uses proposed and max parking being proposed now. [Planning comment, DA Draft, page 4]

See Document Markup

Provide numerical setback, if deviating from required 25 foot setback along street frontages. [Planning comment, DA Draft, page 4]

See Document Markup

See Document Markup

Will conversion of barns from one story to two story exceed the ARO max height of 40 feet? If so, add new section on height here. [Planning comment, DA Draft, page 4]

See Document Markup

These property names are not defined. Use parcel numbers or otherwise define East and West. [Planning comment, DA Draft, page 4]

See Document Markup

What is Exhibit D? This needs to be provided to show compliance with 60% impervious. [Planning comment, DA Draft, page 4]

See Document Markup

Provide clarification on the nature of connection. [Planning comment, DA Draft, page 4]

See Document Markup

Should this be Phase 6? Or is there a different Phase 6 that is missing? [Planning comment, DA Draft, page 5]

See Document Markup

Briefly list the intent of these renovations, consistent with Section 6.C.4. [Planning comment, DA Draft, page 5]

See Document Markup

Pole signs are not permitted in the ARO zone; DA should define max height and area if a pole sign is being proposed. Otherwise it is assumed that all signage will comply with ARO zone allowances. [Planning comment, DA Draft, page 5]

See Document Markup

Please clarify this request. Is this meaning frontage improvements, or any/all off-site improvements if required? What improvements could this include: traffic, storm, etc.? [Planning comment, DA Draft, page 6]

See Document Markup

Revise to "Development and Permitting Services Director" [Planning comment, DA Draft, page 6]

See Document Markup

Revise to: Steve Kirkelie, City Manager [Planning comment, DA Draft, page 8]

See Document Markup

If this Exhibit is being retained, rename to: Original DA Site Plan (date) [Planning comment, DA Draft, page 11]

See Document Markup

This play feature is not indicated on the other site plan, but there is a tractor storage option 1 in its place. Is this still an option for the site plan? [Planning comment, DA Draft, page 11]

See Document Markup

If keeping the previous site plan (Exhibit B), rename to: Exhibit C, Updated DA Site Plan (date) [Planning comment, DA Draft, page 12]

See Document Markup

Amend this site plan figure to use naming and labels consistent with Section C. For example, the auxiliary building and festival building are shown as barns here. The document and both site plans should use the same naming for continuity/clarity. [Planning comment, DA Draft, page 12]

See Document Markup

Provide more specificity for how the square footages are changing for these structures. [Planning comment, DA Draft, page 12]

See Document Markup

See Document Markup

See Document Markup

See Document Markup

Please amend project description to include the approximate increase in building square footage that is proposed as part of converting 1-story buildings to 2-story buildings or other expansion.

Other/Miscellaneous

Per PMC 1.15.030, development agreements may allow development standards different from those otherwise imposed under municipal code in order to provide flexibility to achieve public benefits, respond to changing community needs or encourage modifications which provide the functional equivalent or adequately achieve the purposes of otherwise applicable city standards. Please clarify how the requests under this agreement meet the standard of public benefit or functional equivalent to city standards.

See Document Markup

Clarify-It is unclear how/why this proposed DA relates to the submitted SEPA checklist to add 39 parking stalls. [DA; Page 1]

See Document Markup

Only two lots provided in Exhibit A and B. [DA; Page 2]

See Document Markup

provided the improvements do not create a sight distance or other public safety concern. [DA; Page 4]

See Document Markup

Exhibit D not provided. [DA; Page 4]

See Document Markup

spelling. [DA; Page 4]

See Document Markup

The 1st sentence is no longer relevant. Provide language that the property will complete the public sewer main installation in accordance with the approved plans associated with Permit E21-0066. [DA; Page 4]

See Document Markup

Provide a mutually agreed deadline to complete the public sewer main installation in accordance with the approved plans associated with Permit E21-0066. [DA; Page 5]

See Document Markup

Staff cannot agree to this provision. Offsite improvements are for the benefit of public safety and welfare and cannot be waived en masse. Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the development, the Owner shall construct half-street improvements along the 33rd St SE and 8th Ave SE frontages of the property, including curb, gutter, sidewalk, stormwater conveyance, street lighting, and landscaping. [DA; Page 6]

See Document Markup

Add: "unless other county, state or federal laws preempt or otherwise preclude the City's authority to vest regulations. [DA; Page 6]

See Document Markup

Add-"To the extent this Agreement does not establish or define development regulations or standards covering a certain subject, element or condition, the development shall be governed by the City Development Standards." [DA; Page 7]

See Document Markup

Clarify-It is unclear how/why this proposed SEPA checklist to add 39 parking stalls relates to the submitted Development Agreement. [SEPA Cklist; Page 1]

See Document Markup

Please provide a scalable full-size drawing of the development. [DA; Page 12]

Other/Miscellaneous

Please submit a comprehensive traffic scoping document that summarizes the current trip generation assumptions for the current site + proposed buildout. This traffic document will need to verify the current uses/sizes/occupancy of each existing & proposed buildings. Anticipated events will need clearly defined (size, frequency, duration, parking demand, etc.). It’s my understanding that field data has been collected per your Traffic Engineer. The review of the proposed DA cannot be completed until this information is reviewed/approved by the City. The success of Farm 12 and the other business ventures on site have highlighted significant parking deficiencies. A detailed parking analysis will be required that evaluates existing + proposed buildout. Analysis will need to estimate parking demand for anticipated events. Currently, visitors are using the graveled area on the south side 8th Ave SE as parking. It’s the City’s understanding this area is owned by Pierce Co and is intended for Foothills trail users. The City has pedestrian safety concerns with Farm 12/Step-by-Step using this area for parking. Applicant will be required to coordinate with Pierce Co & the City of Puyallup regarding parking at this location. Please clarify section “O” regarding off-site improvements: “The developments on this property are exempt from the regulations which may require off-site improvements.” • Is the DA asking for an exemption from code required frontage improvements (11.08.135)? • Or is this section asking for an exemption from all off-site mitigation (traffic, utilities, stormwater, etc.)? It’s our understanding the adjacent Maskal property has been acquired by this development. Will this property be included in this DA? Off-site pedestrian/ADA improvements will be required. • Per City policy, marked crosswalks must be separated by at least 350ft. • Midblock crosswalks are not allowed.