| Review Type |
Outcome |
Est. Completion Date |
Completed |
|
Engineering Civil Review
|
Approved
|
08/18/2022
|
09/01/2022
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add: "Permit E-21-0286" [Storm Agreement]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Use Correct Zip Code [Storm Agreement; Exhibit A]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Per Collection's comment above, there currently is no manhole at this location. A new structure will be necessary to make the tie-in. Refer to City Std Detail 02.01.01 for structure sizing. [Plans; Sht C6]
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
Provide DRAFT copy of the City's Engineering Cost Estimate form. (See City Website-Development Engineering-Additional Forms.)
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Approx. grades based on 7th Ave CIP Drawings. (typ) [Plans; Sht C4]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Per 06-07-22 discussion w/ Dan S., site to be adjusted to match future CIP at back-of-walk. [Plans; Sht C4]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Pedestrian Access Path will have to be revised to meet future CIP improvement...exceeds allowable ADA slope as shown. (Ref. Higginson email dated 06-08-22)[Plans; Sht C4]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-Rim is below overflow elevation. Clarify contours to capture a portion of the driveway runoff[Plans; Sht C4]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-Rim is below overflow elevation.[Plans; Sht C4]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Per KPG CIP drawings, there is an existing gas main that is adjacent to the water line across the frontage. Add to plans.[Plans; Sht C4]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
This area is bypassing the storm facility and should be included in the Bypass Basin model run. In addition, raising the grade across the site is allowing runoff from this area to discharge onto the neighboring property to the west. Provide a collection swale or other feature to capture runoff before crossing the property line or provide justification that the neighboring property will not be impacted by the project. [Plans; Sht C5]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
See comments, Sheet C6. [Plans; Sht C5]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
See comments, Sheet C6. [Plans; Sht C5]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add new storm structure at this location. Due to likely conflict with the existing gas main and existing water main, the City would allow the use of Type 1 curb inlet with access in the planter. Use City Standard Type 1 if there is adequate clearance to existing utilities. [Plans; Sht C6]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Locate CB1 outside curb radius.[Plans; Sht C6]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Relocate per comment above. Use grate inlet if feasible.[Plans; Sht C6]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Reverse flow direction.[Plans; Sht C6]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
At double asterisks, only include work in the ROW. [Cost Estimate]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Revise per comments. [Cost Estimate]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Have you considered the backwater condition on this pipe run for storm events up to the 50-yr event? [Plans; Sht C4]
|
|
Engineering Storm Review
|
Approved
|
08/18/2022
|
09/01/2022
|
|
|
|
|
Public Works Streets Review
|
Approved
|
08/18/2022
|
09/01/2022
|
|
|
|
|
Public Works Collection Review
|
Approved
|
08/18/2022
|
08/31/2022
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Due to the age of this storm pipe an appropriately sized, saddle style manhole, not a Type II. [Plans; Sht C6]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Use of 8-inch with approved AMR; If clearance allows follow CoP standard and use 12-in. [Plans; Sht C6]
|
|
Engineering Traffic Review
|
Approved
|
08/18/2022
|
08/31/2022
|
|
|
|
|
Public Works Water Review
|
Approved
|
08/18/2022
|
08/23/2022
|
|
|
|
|
Fire Review
|
Approved
|
08/18/2022
|
08/15/2022
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
Reviewed for compliance 05/17/2022
|
|
Planning Review
|
Approved
|
08/18/2022
|
08/08/2022
|
|
|
|
|
Public Works Collection Review
|
Failed
|
06/22/2022
|
06/09/2022
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Civil Review
|
Failed
|
05/20/2022
|
06/09/2022
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Missing WWHM Modeling Results [Storm Report; Appendix C]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Use correct Parcel Number [Storm Agreement]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add: "Permit E-21-0286" [Storm Agreement]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
City signature and notary page required prior to recording. Coordinate with Engineer Support Specialist, Robyn Buck, rbuck@puyallupwa.gov. [Storm Agreement]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Delete [Storm Agreement; Exhibit A]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Use Correct Zip Code [Storm Agreement; Exhibit A]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Use the Facility Maintenance Checklists included in the 'City's Stormwater Maintenance Manual for Private Facilities' and available on the City's website. [Storm Agreement; Exhibit A]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add reference to City Std Detail 01.02.08a associated Soil Amendment requirements for planted areas. [Landscape Plan]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
See comments, Sht C6 [Plans; Sht C4]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
See comments, Sht C6 [Plans; Sht C4]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Per Collection's comment above, there currently is no manhole at this location. A new structure will be necessary to make the tie-in. Refer to City Std Detail 02.01.01 for structure sizing. [Plans; Sht C6]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add: "Control" [Plans; Sht C5]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add Note: "Coordinate final hydrant location with City CIP Group" [Plans; Sht C9]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Reference MHigginson email dated March 16, 2022:Per the Building Dept and teh IRC, each unit should have it?s own sewer line exiting the unit into a private sewerservice line that discharges to the parcel?s service lateral at the ROW. If the private sewer service line serving all ofthe units exceeds 6-inches (very unlikely), then a manhole is necessary at the ROW line, rather than the typical 6-incleanout.Please be aware that any “total” change of 90-degrees in grade or alignment requires a cleanout (if the pipe is 8-in,or larger, (again unlikely) then use manholes instead of cleanouts)The City cannot tell you how to design the system, but you might want to consider one service line between thebuildings that Units 2,3,5, and 6 discharge into (or all the units if you can get under the storm line for either Unit 1or 2)…just keep in mind bullet point four above. [Plans; Sht C9]
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
Provide DRAFT copy of the City's Engineering Cost Estimate form. (See City Website-Development Engineering-Additional Forms.)
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Approx. grades based on 7th Ave CIP Drawings. (typ) [Plans; Sht C4]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Per 06-07-22 discussion w/ Dan S., site to be adjusted to match future CIP at back-of-walk. [Plans; Sht C4]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Pedestrian Access Path will have to be revised to meet future CIP improvement...exceeds allowable ADA slope as shown. (Ref. Higginson email dated 06-08-22)[Plans; Sht C4]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-Rim is below overflow elevation. Clarify contours to capture a portion of the driveway runoff[Plans; Sht C4]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-Rim is below overflow elevation.[Plans; Sht C4]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Per KPG CIP drawings, there is an existing gas main that is adjacent to the water line across the frontage. Add to plans.[Plans; Sht C4]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
This area is bypassing the storm facility and should be included in the Bypass Basin model run. In addition, raising the grade across the site is allowing runoff from this area to discharge onto the neighboring property to the west. Provide a collection swale or other feature to capture runoff before crossing the property line or provide justification that the neighboring property will not be impacted by the project. [Plans; Sht C5]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
See comments, Sheet C6. [Plans; Sht C5]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
See comments, Sheet C6. [Plans; Sht C5]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add new storm structure at this location. Due to likely conflict with the existing gas main and existing water main, the City would allow the use of Type 1 curb inlet with access in the planter. Use City Standard Type 1 if there is adequate clearance to existing utilities. [Plans; Sht C6]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Locate CB1 outside curb radius.[Plans; Sht C6]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Relocate per comment above. Use grate inlet if feasible.[Plans; Sht C6]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Reverse flow direction.[Plans; Sht C6]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
At double asterisks, only include work in the ROW. [Cost Estimate]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Revise per comments. [Cost Estimate]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Have you considered the backwater condition on this pipe run for storm events up to the 50-yr event? [Plans; Sht C4]
|
|
Public Works Streets Review
|
Approved
|
05/20/2022
|
06/06/2022
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Storm Review
|
Approved
|
05/20/2022
|
06/06/2022
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Traffic Review
|
Approved
|
05/20/2022
|
05/24/2022
|
|
|
|
|
Planning Review
|
Approved
|
05/20/2022
|
05/19/2022
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Trees must be planted min. 7.5' from SD line. [landscape sheet 1 of 1]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide labeling for this plant symbol. [landscape sheet 1 of 1]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Root protection zone for off site tree (see erosion control and limits of clearing on civil plans - will this tree conflict with root protection zone? [landscape sheet 1 of 1]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
All perimeter side and rear yards must comply with Type III landscaping requirements (plant selection) - see section 14.3 of the city's Veg. Management Standards manual (VMS). [landscape sheet 1 of 1]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Trees must be planted min. 7.5' from SD line. [landscape sheet 1 of 1
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Trees must be planted min. 7.5' from Sewer line. [landscape sheet 1 of 1
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Trees must be planted min. 7.5' from SD line. [landscape sheet 1 of 1
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Given the location of the water line on the east perimeter area, choose smaller shrubs from type III plant list for this area. Myrica is a small tree and will conflict with shallow water line infrastructure [landscape sheet 1 of 1]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Trees must be planted min. 7.5' from Sewer line and water line - one tree, centered between the S and W line will be acceptable here. [landscape sheet 1 of 1
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Import city standard tree planting detail [landscape sheet 1 of 1].
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Identify all soil resources on site currently and analyze their potential re-use on-site. Identify all soil resources to be used and estimated soil volumes to meet the soil depth and quantity requirements stipulated by section 8.2 (VMS); provide details of soil source and composition. Identify if soil will be imported or if on-site soils will be retained and amended. [landscape sheet 1 of 1]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
all planting areas shall bemulched with a uniform four(4”) inch layer of organiccompost mulch material orwood chips over a properlycleaned, amended andgraded subsurface. Pleasespecify mulch type and 4"depth [landscape sheet 1 of1]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
|
|
|
See Document Markup
|
|
|
See Document Markup
|
|
|
See Document Markup
|
|
|
See Document Markup
|
|
|
See Document Markup
|
|
|
See Document Markup
See erosion control and limits of clearing sheet. Existing tree to be retained in this area - to be shown as integrated into the landscape plan. [landscape sheets 1 of 1]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Import city tree protection detail onto this sheet. [sheet C2]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Standard stalls should be sized at 8' x18' [sheet C7]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Compact stalls should be sized at 7' x15' [sheet C7]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Where is the ADA van stall? There should be 1 shown on site plan with accessible pathway [sheet C7]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Providing a paved, accessible pathway to open space seating areas (see landscape sheets) for ADA is recommended [sheet C7]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Enclosure may need to be oriented to allow trash hauler access if dumpsters are used. Trash enclosure may need to be pushed into landscape area to south to accomodate ADA van stall [Sheet C7]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
|
|
Fire Review
|
Approved
|
05/20/2022
|
05/17/2022
|
|
|
|
|
Public Works Collection Review
|
Approved
|
05/20/2022
|
05/11/2022
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Due to the age of this storm pipe an appropriately sized, saddle style manhole with a standard gutter CB grated frame and lid will need to be used for this structure. [Plans; Sht C6]
|
|
Public Works Water Review
|
Approved
|
05/20/2022
|
05/05/2022
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Civil Review
|
Failed
|
02/08/2022
|
03/21/2022
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Missing WWHM Modeling Results [Storm Report; Appendix C]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Use correct Parcel Number [Storm Agreement]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add: "Permit E-21-0286" [Storm Agreement]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
City signature and notary page required prior to recording. Coordinate with Engineer Support Specialist, Robyn Buck, rbuck@puyallupwa.gov. [Storm Agreement]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Delete [Storm Agreement; Exhibit A]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Use Correct Zip Code [Storm Agreement; Exhibit A]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Use the Facility Maintenance Checklists included in the 'City's Stormwater Maintenance Manual for Private Facilities' and available on the City's website. [Storm Agreement; Exhibit A]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add reference to City Std Detail 01.02.08a associated Soil Amendment requirements for planted areas. [Landscape Plan]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
See comments, Sht C6 [Plans; Sht C4]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
See comments, Sht C6 [Plans; Sht C4]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Per Collection's comment above, there currently is no manhole at this location. A new structure will be necessary to make the tie-in. Refer to City Std Detail 02.01.01 for structure sizing. [Plans; Sht C6]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add: "Control" [Plans; Sht C5]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add Note: "Coordinate final hydrant location with City CIP Group" [Plans; Sht C9]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Reference MHigginson email dated March 16, 2022:Per the Building Dept and teh IRC, each unit should have it?s own sewer line exiting the unit into a private sewerservice line that discharges to the parcel?s service lateral at the ROW. If the private sewer service line serving all ofthe units exceeds 6-inches (very unlikely), then a manhole is necessary at the ROW line, rather than the typical 6-incleanout.Please be aware that any “total” change of 90-degrees in grade or alignment requires a cleanout (if the pipe is 8-in,or larger, (again unlikely) then use manholes instead of cleanouts)The City cannot tell you how to design the system, but you might want to consider one service line between thebuildings that Units 2,3,5, and 6 discharge into (or all the units if you can get under the storm line for either Unit 1or 2)…just keep in mind bullet point four above. [Plans; Sht C9]
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
Provide DRAFT copy of the City's Engineering Cost Estimate form. (See City Website-Development Engineering-Additional Forms.)
|
|
Engineering Traffic Review
|
Approved
|
02/08/2022
|
03/21/2022
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Storm Review
|
Approved
|
02/08/2022
|
03/17/2022
|
|
|
|
|
Public Works Streets Review
|
Approved
|
02/08/2022
|
03/17/2022
|
|
|
|
|
Public Works Water Review
|
Failed
|
02/08/2022
|
02/10/2022
|
|
|
|
|
Public Works Collection Review
|
Approved
|
02/08/2022
|
02/08/2022
|
|
|
|
|
Planning Review
|
Failed
|
02/08/2022
|
02/08/2022
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Trees must be planted min. 7.5' from SD line. [landscape sheet 1 of 1]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide labeling for this plant symbol. [landscape sheet 1 of 1]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Root protection zone for off site tree (see erosion control and limits of clearing on civil plans - will this tree conflict with root protection zone? [landscape sheet 1 of 1]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
All perimeter side and rear yards must comply with Type III landscaping requirements (plant selection) - see section 14.3 of the city's Veg. Management Standards manual (VMS). [landscape sheet 1 of 1]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Trees must be planted min. 7.5' from SD line. [landscape sheet 1 of 1
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Trees must be planted min. 7.5' from Sewer line. [landscape sheet 1 of 1
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Trees must be planted min. 7.5' from SD line. [landscape sheet 1 of 1
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Given the location of the water line on the east perimeter area, choose smaller shrubs from type III plant list for this area. Myrica is a small tree and will conflict with shallow water line infrastructure [landscape sheet 1 of 1]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Trees must be planted min. 7.5' from Sewer line and water line - one tree, centered between the S and W line will be acceptable here. [landscape sheet 1 of 1
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Import city standard tree planting detail [landscape sheet 1 of 1].
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Identify all soil resources on site currently and analyze their potential re-use on-site. Identify all soil resources to be used and estimated soil volumes to meet the soil depth and quantity requirements stipulated by section 8.2 (VMS); provide details of soil source and composition. Identify if soil will be imported or if on-site soils will be retained and amended. [landscape sheet 1 of 1]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
all planting areas shall bemulched with a uniform four(4”) inch layer of organiccompost mulch material orwood chips over a properlycleaned, amended andgraded subsurface. Pleasespecify mulch type and 4"depth [landscape sheet 1 of1]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
|
|
|
See Document Markup
|
|
|
See Document Markup
|
|
|
See Document Markup
|
|
|
See Document Markup
|
|
|
See Document Markup
|
|
|
See Document Markup
See erosion control and limits of clearing sheet. Existing tree to be retained in this area - to be shown as integrated into the landscape plan. [landscape sheets 1 of 1]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Import city tree protection detail onto this sheet. [sheet C2]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Standard stalls should be sized at 8' x18' [sheet C7]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Compact stalls should be sized at 7' x15' [sheet C7]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Where is the ADA van stall? There should be 1 shown on site plan with accessible pathway [sheet C7]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Providing a paved, accessible pathway to open space seating areas (see landscape sheets) for ADA is recommended [sheet C7]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Enclosure may need to be oriented to allow trash hauler access if dumpsters are used. Trash enclosure may need to be pushed into landscape area to south to accomodate ADA van stall [Sheet C7]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
|
|
Fire Review
|
Approved
|
02/08/2022
|
01/27/2022
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Civil Review
|
Failed
|
|
10/11/2021
|
|
|
|
|
Planning Review
|
Failed
|
|
10/11/2021
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Planning Correction
See comments on sheets C2, C7 and landscape plan sheets (redline mark up comments).
VMS document may be located here: http://www.cityofpuyallup.org/DocumentCenter/View/1133 - VMS appendices may be found here: http://www.cityofpuyallup.org/DocumentCenter/View/6054
|
|
Engineering Traffic Review
|
Failed
|
|
10/11/2021
|
|
|
|
|
Fire Review
|
Approved
|
|
08/24/2021
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Traffic Review
|
Approved
|
|
07/20/2021
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Storm Review
|
Approved
|
|
07/20/2021
|
|
|
|
|
Public Works Streets Review
|
Approved
|
|
07/20/2021
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Civil Review
|
Approved
|
|
07/20/2021
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
|
|
Fire Review
|
Approved
|
|
07/16/2021
|
|
|
|
|
Planning Review
|
Approved
|
|
06/30/2021
|
|
|
|
|
Public Works Water Review
|
Approved
|
|
06/17/2021
|
|
|
|
|
Public Works Collection Review
|
Approved
|
|
06/08/2021
|
|
|
|