Review Type |
Outcome |
Est. Completion Date |
Completed |
Engineering Civil Review
|
Approved
|
01/23/2024
|
02/02/2024
|
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Show the commercial side sewer connection with sampling connection per city standard 04.03.04 [civils, pg 5]
|
|
See Document Markup
Groundwater was determined to be 2.5' below the existing ground surface during the wet season. The proposed detention vault excavation will require dewatering. Show the location of proposed baker tanks for dewatering. [civils, pg 3]
|
|
See Document Markup
Size the contech water quality device per minimum requirement 6 the 2019 DOE manual. [D report, pg 39]
|
|
See Document Markup
Include figure III-1.1 Runoff Treatment BMP Selection Flow Chart. [drainage plans, pg 12]
|
|
See Document Markup
The proposed 12" reinforced concrete pipe is proposing to flow upstream. Provide a minimum 0.5% slope downstream. [civils, pg 5]
|
|
See Document Markup
Design standard 208.1(10) requires the interior floor to be slope to a type 1 catch basin and plumbed to sanitary sewer. Show this on the plans. [civils, pg 2]
|
|
See Document Markup
Include a section providing the calculation showing that MR 6 is met for the proposed inline CDS based on continuous modeling. [drainage plans, pg 11]
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide additional information as to how the conduit will be connected to the service cabinet. Will this be done via trench or boring? [civils, pg 6]
|
|
See Document Markup
Darken the existing linetypes, they are too faint to see in the background on this sheet. [civils, pg 4]
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide pipe material, slope and diameter. [civils, pg 4]
|
|
See Document Markup
Is this the existing pipe within Inter Ave? If yes, revise to "existing". [civils, pg 5]
|
|
See Document Markup
This streetlight is proposed on private property at 2315 Inter Ave. Revise the streetlight location further east to be just inside of 2401 Inter Ave's property within the proposed utility easement. [civils, pg 6]
|
|
See Document Markup
The comment response letter states that the project will be trenching to place the conduit. Note on this page that the work will be conducted via trenching. Additionally, provide an off-site depiction of the conduit connection, trenching and patching. [civils, pg 6]
|
|
See Document Markup
City design standard 208.1(2) requires the minimum depth of the trash enclosure to be 12'. [civils, pg 2]
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide a grade break at the entrance of the trash enclosure to prevent stormwater runoff from entering. [civils, pg 4]
|
|
See Document Markup
Revise to an upturned elbow to prevent sediment from discharging to sewer. [civils, pg 4]
|
|
See Document Markup
The reference name for keynote 1 does not match the above city standard detail. [civils, pg 9]
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide a sizing calculation for the proposed voltclarex oil/water separator. [drainage report, pg 13]
|
|
See Document Markup
Denote the longitudinal slope of the existing swale. Provide a profile detail view. [civils, pg 4]
|
|
See Document Markup
The proposed pipe diameter is double the recommended maximum. Has Contech been consulted in this regard? [civils, pg 12]
|
|
See Document Markup
On this conveyance flow calculation sheet, include the 25-year design storm event to compare to proposed pipe. [drainage report, pg 24]
|
|
See Document Markup
It does not appear that the 50% flow ratio was used in this calculation. 1.365cfs would be the full flow capacity. [civils, pg 24]
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide an additional figure showing downstream conveyance. [drainage report, pg 24]
|
|
See Document Markup
Based on the record drawings for E-20-0137, the slope here is too steep, provide an analysis utilizing the shallowest pipe slope downstream of the swale. Public records can be requested here: https://cityofpuyallup.nextrequest.com/. [drainage report, pg 25]
|
|
See Document Markup
Remove this preliminary only note, this detail will be used for construction. [civils, pg 9]
|
|
See Document Markup
The riser height and the WWHM modeling riser height do not match. Revise accordingly. [civils, pg 13]
|
|
See Document Markup
Are fire sprinklers required for the building? If so, provide an independent fire service from the domestic and irrigation lines per design standard 302.3. Show this update on sheet [civils, pg 1]
|
|
See Document Markup
What is this line representing? [civils, pg 3]
|
|
See Document Markup
Is the project proposing both a sediment pond and baker tank? If so, show the connection from the pond to the tank. [civils, pg 3]
|
|
See Document Markup
Size the sediment pond and swale per the 2019 DOE manual. Be sure to include an overflow spillway See additional swale information here: https://fortress.wa.gov/ecy/ezshare/wq/Permits/Flare/2019SWMMWW/2019SWMMWW.htm#Topics/VolumeII/ConstructionStormwaterBMPs/ConstructionRunoffBMPs/BMPc200.htm?Highlight=swale [civils, pg 3]
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide a detail for the proposed sediment pond. Include a divider as required by DOE. See more information here: https://fortress.wa.gov/ecy/ezshare/wq/Permits/Flare/2019SWMMWW/2019SWMMWW.htm#Topics/VolumeII/ConstructionStormwaterBMPs/ConstructionRunoffBMPs/BMPc241.htm?Highlight=sediment%20pond [civils, pg 3]
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide pipe diameter, material and slope. Include rip-rap at the discharge point to the swale. [civils, pg 3]
|
|
See Document Markup
The contours shown on this site plan do not appear to direct stormwater runoff to the proposed swale. Revise accordingly. [civils, pg 3]
|
|
See Document Markup
Make a note that dewatering is anticipated as the seasonal high groundwater elevation was determined to be 2.5' below the existing ground surface. [civils, pg 3]
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide a sizing calculation for the proposed voltclarex oil filter per the 2019 DOE manual. [civils, pg 4]
|
|
See Document Markup
Reference keynote 9/13 for flow control manhole. [civils, pg 4]
|
|
See Document Markup
Remove additional linework. [civils, pg 2]
|
|
See Document Markup
Within the proposed utility easement provide the legal description of easement area in question. [easement, pg 4]
|
|
See Document Markup
For exhibit B, provide a map showing the site and proposed utility easement. [easement, pg 5]
|
|
See Document Markup
City standard 01.05.04 requires a minimum 12' mast arm and the front of the fixture to be 3' minimum from the face of the curb. [civils, pg 6]
|
|
See Document Markup
Revise Street Planter note to state trees to be installed behind sidewalk. This detail conflicts with the landscape plan. [civils, pg 8]
|
|
See Document Markup
This soil amendment detail is also on page 9, one of them can be removed. [civils, pg 12]
|
|
See Document Markup
Fill out and submit the Engineering Cost estimate for the next re-submittal. : https://www.cityofpuyallup.org/DocumentCenter/View/1403/Cost-Estimate. [civils, pg 1]
|
|
See Document Markup
Indicate that the domestic water and sewage is served by the City of Puyallup. [civils, pg 1]
|
|
See Document Markup
Show street lights along Inter Ave. [civils, pg 2]
|
|
See Document Markup
Include a detail for the proposed fence. [civils, pg 2]
|
|
See Document Markup
Connect the roof downspout of the trash enclosure to the proposed detention system. [civils, pg 2]
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide an option 2 narrative within the storm report. How much additional hard surfaces would be proposed? [civils, pg 2]
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide a plan for temporary stormwater mitigation to detain stormwater flows equal to the 100 year/24 hour storm event. [civils, pg 3]
|
|
See Document Markup
This type of inlet protection is not appropriate for use in the public right of way vehicular lane. Provide a silt sock detail instead. [civils, pg 3]
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide a detail for the proposed baker tank. Be sure to include the dimensions and volume. [civils, pg 3]
|
|
See Document Markup
Show existing and proposed grading contours/spot elevations on this sheet. Add the linetypes to the legend. [civils, pg 3]
|
|
See Document Markup
Show proposed stockpile location. [civils, pg 3]
|
|
See Document Markup
Show the proposed swale on the plans and provide a detail. [civils, pg 3]
|
|
See Document Markup
Clearly show the existing sewer within Inter Ave. [civils, pg 4]
|
|
See Document Markup
Revise the sewer connection from the manhole to be a sewer main tap to the sewer main line per city standard 04.02.01 on sheet C9. [site plan, pg 4]
|
|
See Document Markup
Indicate that the proposed sewer service is private. [civils, pg 4]
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide a commercial side sewer sampling connection per city standard 04.03.04. Be sure to include this detail on a separate sheet. [civils, pg 4]
|
|
See Document Markup
City standard 03.03.01 requires the water service be 1" poly pipe that is high density poly meeting ASTM D-2239-SIDR 7.
|
|
See Document Markup
Number and Provide rim elevations for the SSCO's. [civils, pg 4]
|
|
See Document Markup
PVC sewer pipe requires 3' of cover. Include additional information showing the depth for the proposed sewer service. [civils, pg 4]
|
|
See Document Markup
Show the proposed irrigation meter and DCVA. [civils, pg 4]
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide water service length, diameter and material. [civils, pg 4]
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide the utility crossing information to ensure there are no conflicts. [civils, pg 4]
|
|
See Document Markup
What is this SD linetype along the eastern portion of the site representing? [civils, pg 4]
|
|
See Document Markup
What is this line representing? [civils, pg 4]
|
|
See Document Markup
City standards require 3' of cover for dual walled polypropylene. Provide additional cover or revise pipe material to ductile iron. [civils, pg 4]
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide pipe length, material and slope from proposed building to the detention system. [civils, pg 4]
|
|
See Document Markup
Define the lid types for the proposed CB's. Vaned grate or solid lid. [civils, pg 4]
|
|
See Document Markup
Revise the sewer sampling cleanouts to be within 4' of each other required by CS 04.03.04. [civils, pg 4]
|
|
See Document Markup
Reference sheet 14 for the sidewalk ramp as well [civils, pg 5]
|
|
See Document Markup
This keynote 14 reference does not appear to be an 8" fire line, but rather the domestic service to the building. [civils, pg 5]
|
|
See Document Markup
What are these lines representing? [civils, pg 5]
|
|
See Document Markup
The location of the sawcut is not clear, provide a an outline of the full depth cut and street patch on the south side of the inter ave centerline. [civils, pg 5]
|
|
See Document Markup
Place this proposed catch basin within the gutter line rather than the travel lane. [civils, pg 5]
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide spot elevations along the driveway approach showing the sidewalk is installed at a minimum 2% cross-slope. [civils, pg 5]
|
|
See Document Markup
City records show this sewer main is concrete. [civils, pg 5]
|
|
See Document Markup
What are these lines representing? [civils, pg 5]
|
|
See Document Markup
The plan view does not show a 12" storm main being installed between stations 0+75.00 and 3+60.00. Is this the existing storm main on the south side of Inter Ave? [civils, pg 5]
|
|
See Document Markup
Define the curb radius for the driveway approach. [civils, pg 5]
|
|
See Document Markup
Show the 3' cross gutter as outline in city standard 01.02.19. [civils, pg 5]
|
|
See Document Markup
Clearly show the edges of the property boundary lines. [civils, pg 6]
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide the city a draft 10' utility easement for maintenance of the junction boxes and street lights for the city to review. The draft form can be found here: https://www.cityofpuyallup.org/DocumentCenter/View/7331/Appendix-C-?bidId= [civils, pg 6]
|
|
See Document Markup
Revise to 2525 Inter Ave. [civils, pg 6]
|
|
See Document Markup
Include city standard 03.01.03-2. [civils, pg 7]
|
|
See Document Markup
Include city standard detail 02.03.02 on the plans. [civils, pg 7]
|
|
See Document Markup
Create a note on this detail and frontage plans that states the trees will be installed at the back of the sidewalk. [civils, pg 8]
|
|
See Document Markup
The maximum grade shown on sheet 4 nearby the detention system is 64' revise this information. [civils, pg 12]
|
|
See Document Markup
Include city standard 04.03.04 commercial side sewer connection with sampling connection. [civils, pg 12]
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide additional information regarding the flow control manhole orifice and elevation. [civils, pg 13]
|
|
See Document Markup
Show spot elevations. [civils, pg 14]
|
|
See Document Markup
Figure III-1.1 Runoff Treatment BMP Selection flow chart was not included in the report. [drainage report, pg 11]
|
|
See Document Markup
Due to the existing roadway coarse being so worn, the city has determined that the roadway cannot just be ground down and overlayed. The 2019 DOE manual allows grind and overlay of the existing surface without being considered a "replaced hard surface". Once the subgrade is disturbed, which is warranted in this case these are considered replaced hard surfaces and require treatment. The project has 2 options to move forward toward approval:
Option 1: Provide a treatment BMP within Inter Ave which meets minimum requirement #6.
Option 2: The city is looking to partner with various projects within this area to rebuild this section of roadway and upgrade stormwater which would include a treatment BMP at the west end of Inter Ave. This city would expect the project to install curb, gutter, sidewalk and the street lights as feasible. A bond or fee would be required from the project in which the city would be require to use for the improvements within 5 years.
|
|
See Document Markup
Reference the detail on this sheet and detail 3/C8 for pavement thickness for the half-street replacement rather than 01.01.19 [civils, sheet C6]
|
|
|
Public Works Streets Review
|
Approved
|
01/23/2024
|
01/31/2024
|
|
|
|
|
Planning Review
|
Approved
|
01/23/2024
|
01/31/2024
|
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
The proposed filling of the wetland shall be fully mitigated in accordance with any conditions from the state Department of Ecology and/or U.S. Army Corps (USACE). This exemption does not relieve the applicant/property owner from permits required by the state Department of Ecology and/or U.S. Army Corps (USACE). The applicant/property owner shall provide proof of applicable approvals, exemptions and/or permits obtained from the state Department of Ecology and/or U.S. Army Corps (USACE) prior to the city approving any construction permits for the subject fill action (PMC 21.06.910(4)(e)). The city will also require proof if the state Department of Ecology and/or U.S. Army Corps (USACE) does not grant approval for the filling of the wetland in order to issue an approval of the site plan that corresponds with the denial of filling the wetland prior to the city approving any construction permits.
Please resubmit with the decision made by the Department of Ecology and/or U.S. Army Corps (USACE).
|
|
|
Public Works Water Review
|
Approved
|
01/23/2024
|
01/17/2024
|
|
|
|
See Document Markup
CIVIL PLANS Sheet C5: Change sheet title to Grading, Drainage, Sewer, and Water Plan
|
|
See Document Markup
CIVIL PLANS Sheet C5: Fire hydrant needs its own 6-inch gate valve and hydrant run off the 8-inch water main run. Relocate the 8-inch water main to the east enough to support a 2-foot hydrant run, a 6-inch gate valve, and an 8-inch MJ x 6-inch Fl tee with an 8-inch MJ plug to the north.
|
|
See Document Markup
CIVIL PLANS Sheet C5: The domestic water service meter size is not called out. To eliminate an additional service crossing on Inter Ave, tap the proposed 8-inch water main and set the water service meter at the back of sidewalk, as far to the west as possible to avoid large truck off-tracking. Install the above ground RPBA - not DCVA 3-feet north of meter. RPBA size should match water meter size. Run appropriate size poly pipe from back of RPBA to building.
|
|
See Document Markup
Civil resub Sheet C4: Remove this symbol that was called water clean out.
|
|
See Document Markup
Civil resub Sheet C4: The City does not allow deduct meters. Remove this water meter from the irrigation line. If you want the irrigation line to be metered, it will need it's own water service tap separate from the domestic service.
|
|
See Document Markup
Civil resub Sheet C5: Remove this water clean out from this project.
|
|
|
Fire Review
|
Approved
|
01/23/2024
|
01/17/2024
|
|
|
|
|
Public Works Collection Review
|
Approved
|
01/23/2024
|
01/02/2024
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Traffic Review
|
Approved
|
01/23/2024
|
12/27/2023
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Civil Review
|
Failed
|
11/15/2023
|
11/09/2023
|
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide a plan for temporary stormwater mitigation to detain stormwater flows equal to the 100 year/24 hour storm event. [civils, pg 3]
|
|
See Document Markup
Clearly show the edges of the property boundary lines. [civils, pg 6]
|
|
See Document Markup
Create a note on this detail and frontage plans that states the trees will be installed at the back of the sidewalk. [civils, pg 9]
|
|
See Document Markup
Show the commercial side sewer connection with sampling connection per city standard 04.03.04 [civils, pg 5]
|
|
See Document Markup
Groundwater was determined to be 2.5' below the existing ground surface during the wet season. The proposed detention vault excavation will require dewatering. Show the location of proposed baker tanks for dewatering. [civils, pg 3]
|
|
See Document Markup
Size the contech water quality device per minimum requirement 6 the 2019 DOE manual. [D report, pg 39]
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide a downstream analysis showing the conveyance system has capacity for the 25-year, 24 hours storm event. [D Report, pg 10]
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide a downstream analysis showing the conveyance system has capacity for the 25-year, 24 hours storm event. [D Report, pg 13]
|
|
See Document Markup
Show street lights along Inter Ave. [civils, pg 2]
|
|
See Document Markup
This type of inlet protection is not appropriate for use in the public right of way vehicular lane. Provide a silt sock detail instead. [civils, pg 3]
|
|
See Document Markup
Indicate that the domestic water and sewage is served by the City of Puyallup. [civils, pg 1]
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide a detail for the proposed baker tank. Be sure to include the dimensions and volume. [civils, pg 3]
|
|
See Document Markup
Show existing and proposed grading contours/spot elevations on this sheet. Add the linetypes to the legend. [civils, pg 3]
|
|
See Document Markup
Show proposed stockpile location. [civils, pg 3]
|
|
See Document Markup
Show the proposed swale on the plans and provide a detail. [civils, pg 3]
|
|
See Document Markup
Clearly show the existing sewer within Inter Ave. [civils, pg 4]
|
|
See Document Markup
Revise the sewer connection from the manhole to be a sewer main tap to the sewer main line per city standard 04.02.01 on sheet C9. [site plan, pg 4]
|
|
See Document Markup
Indicate that the proposed sewer service is private. [civils, pg 4]
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide a commercial side sewer sampling connection per city standard 04.03.04. Be sure to include this detail on a separate sheet. [civils, pg 4]
|
|
See Document Markup
City standard 03.03.01 requires the water service be 1" poly pipe that is high density poly meeting ASTM D-2239-SIDR 7.
|
|
See Document Markup
Number and Provide rim elevations for the SSCO's. [civils, pg 4]
|
|
See Document Markup
PVC sewer pipe requires 3' of cover. Include additional information showing the depth for the proposed sewer service. [civils, pg 4]
|
|
See Document Markup
Show the proposed irrigation meter and DCVA. [civils, pg 4]
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide water service length, diameter and material. [civils, pg 4]
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide the utility crossing information to ensure there are no conflicts. [civils, pg 4]
|
|
See Document Markup
What is this SD linetype along the eastern portion of the site representing? [civils, pg 4]
|
|
See Document Markup
Include city standard 03.01.03-2. [civils, pg 7]
|
|
See Document Markup
What is this line representing? [civils, pg 4]
|
|
See Document Markup
City standards require 3' of cover for dual walled polypropylene. Provide additional cover or revise pipe material to ductile iron. [civils, pg 4]
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide pipe length, material and slope from proposed building to the detention system. [civils, pg 4]
|
|
See Document Markup
Include city standard detail 02.03.02 on the plans. [civils, pg 7]
|
|
See Document Markup
Include the proposed sidewalk hard surfaces as a bypass for the project. This should be included as it is a common plan of development as specified by DOE. [drainage report, pg 23]
|
|
See Document Markup
80,436SF equates to 1.85 acres. Revise the pre and post developed basin sizes to match the table 1 on page 7 and map on page 23. [drainage report, pg 23]
|
|
See Document Markup
The roof to area defined on the plans is 4800SF ie .110 acres. Revise the mitigated roof impervious area in the WWHM calculation. [drainage report, pg 29]
|
|
See Document Markup
Include figure III-1.1 Runoff Treatment BMP Selection Flow Chart. [drainage plans, pg 12]
|
|
See Document Markup
Label this as figure 5. [drainage report, pg 23]
|
|
See Document Markup
20 endcaps are proposed on the plans. [drainage report, pg 31]
|
|
See Document Markup
Define the lid types for the proposed CB's. Vaned grate or solid lid. [civils, pg 4]
|
|
See Document Markup
The maximum grade shown on sheet 4 nearby the detention system is 64' revise this information. [civils, pg 12]
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide additional information regarding the flow control manhole orifice and elevation. [civils, pg 13]
|
|
See Document Markup
Reference sheet 14 for the sidewalk ramp as well [civils, pg 5]
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide the city a draft 10' utility easement for maintenance of the junction boxes and street lights for the city to review. The draft form can be found here: https://www.cityofpuyallup.org/DocumentCenter/View/7331/Appendix-C-?bidId= [civils, pg 6]
|
|
See Document Markup
This keynote 14 reference does not appear to be an 8" fire line, but rather the domestic service to the building. [civils, pg 5]
|
|
See Document Markup
What are these lines representing? [civils, pg 5]
|
|
See Document Markup
The location of the sawcut is not clear, provide a an outline of the full depth cut and street patch on the south side of the inter ave centerline. [civils, pg 5]
|
|
See Document Markup
Place this proposed catch basin within the gutter line rather than the travel lane. [civils, pg 5]
|
|
See Document Markup
The proposed 12" reinforced concrete pipe is proposing to flow upstream. Provide a minimum 0.5% slope downstream. [civils, pg 5]
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide spot elevations along the driveway approach showing the sidewalk is installed at a minimum 2% cross-slope. [civils, pg 5]
|
|
See Document Markup
City records show this sewer main is concrete. [civils, pg 5]
|
|
See Document Markup
What are these lines representing? [civils, pg 5]
|
|
See Document Markup
The plan view does not show a 12" storm main being installed between stations 0+75.00 and 3+60.00. Is this the existing storm main on the south side of Inter Ave? [civils, pg 5]
|
|
See Document Markup
Define the curb radius for the driveway approach. [civils, pg 5]
|
|
See Document Markup
Show the 3' cross gutter as outline in city standard 01.02.19. [civils, pg 5]
|
|
See Document Markup
Revise to 2525 Inter Ave. [civils, pg 6]
|
|
See Document Markup
Create a note on this detail and frontage plans that states the trees will be installed at the back of the sidewalk. [civils, pg 8]
|
|
See Document Markup
Include city standard 04.03.04 commercial side sewer connection with sampling connection. [civils, pg 12]
|
|
See Document Markup
Show spot elevations. [civils, pg 14]
|
|
See Document Markup
Include a detail for the proposed fence. [civils, pg 2]
|
|
See Document Markup
Design standard 208.1(10) requires the interior floor to be slope to a type 1 catch basin and plumbed to sanitary sewer. Show this on the plans. [civils, pg 2]
|
|
See Document Markup
Connect the roof downspout of the trash enclosure to the proposed detention system. [civils, pg 2]
|
|
See Document Markup
Include figure III-1.1 Runoff Treatment BMP Selection Flow Chart. [drainage plans, pg 11]
|
|
See Document Markup
Include a section providing the calculation showing that MR 6 is met for the proposed inline CDS based on continuous modeling. [drainage plans, pg 11]
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide additional information as to how the conduit will be connected to the service cabinet. Will this be done via trench or boring? [civils, pg 6]
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide an option 2 narrative within the storm report. How much additional hard surfaces would be proposed? [civils, pg 2]
|
|
See Document Markup
Darken the existing linetypes, they are too faint to see in the background on this sheet. [civils, pg 4]
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide pipe material, slope and diameter. [civils, pg 4]
|
|
See Document Markup
Is this the existing pipe within Inter Ave? If yes, revise to "existing". [civils, pg 5]
|
|
See Document Markup
This streetlight is proposed on private property at 2315 Inter Ave. Revise the streetlight location further east to be just inside of 2401 Inter Ave's property within the proposed utility easement. [civils, pg 6]
|
|
See Document Markup
The comment response letter states that the project will be trenching to place the conduit. Note on this page that the work will be conducted via trenching. Additionally, provide an off-site depiction of the conduit connection, trenching and patching. [civils, pg 6]
|
|
See Document Markup
City design standard 208.1(2) requires the minimum depth of the trash enclosure to be 12'. [civils, pg 2]
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide a grade break at the entrance of the trash enclosure to prevent stormwater runoff from entering. [civils, pg 4]
|
|
See Document Markup
Revise to an upturned elbow to prevent sediment from discharging to sewer. [civils, pg 4]
|
|
See Document Markup
The reference name for keynote 1 does not match the above city standard detail. [civils, pg 9]
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide a sizing calculation for the proposed voltclarex oil/water separator. [drainage report, pg 13]
|
|
See Document Markup
Denote the longitudinal slope of the existing swale. Provide a profile detail view. [civils, pg 4]
|
|
See Document Markup
The proposed pipe diameter is double the recommended maximum. Has Contech been consulted in this regard? [civils, pg 12]
|
|
See Document Markup
On this conveyance flow calculation sheet, include the 25-year design storm event to compare to proposed pipe. [drainage report, pg 24]
|
|
See Document Markup
It does not appear that the 50% flow ratio was used in this calculation. 1.365cfs would be the full flow capacity. [civils, pg 24]
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide an additional figure showing downstream conveyance. [drainage report, pg 24]
|
|
See Document Markup
Based on the record drawings for E-20-0137, the slope here is too steep, provide an analysis utilizing the shallowest pipe slope downstream of the swale. Public records can be requested here: https://cityofpuyallup.nextrequest.com/. [drainage report, pg 25]
|
|
See Document Markup
Figure 5-A and Figure 5-B differ by a total of .09 acres, with the only difference being removing the wetland with additional paving. Revise to be consistent. The WWHM calculation is modeling a total basin area of 1.88 acres. [drainage report, pg 23]
|
|
See Document Markup
Remove this preliminary only note, this detail will be used for construction. [civils, pg 9]
|
|
See Document Markup
The riser height and the WWHM modeling riser height do not match. Revise accordingly. [civils, pg 13]
|
|
See Document Markup
Are fire sprinklers required for the building? If so, provide an independent fire service from the domestic and irrigation lines per design standard 302.3. Show this update on sheet [civils, pg 1]
|
|
See Document Markup
What is this line representing? [civils, pg 3]
|
|
See Document Markup
Is the project proposing both a sediment pond and baker tank? If so, show the connection from the pond to the tank. [civils, pg 3]
|
|
See Document Markup
Size the sediment pond and swale per the 2019 DOE manual. Be sure to include an overflow spillway See additional swale information here: https://fortress.wa.gov/ecy/ezshare/wq/Permits/Flare/2019SWMMWW/2019SWMMWW.htm#Topics/VolumeII/ConstructionStormwaterBMPs/ConstructionRunoffBMPs/BMPc200.htm?Highlight=swale [civils, pg 3]
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide a detail for the proposed sediment pond. Include a divider as required by DOE. See more information here: https://fortress.wa.gov/ecy/ezshare/wq/Permits/Flare/2019SWMMWW/2019SWMMWW.htm#Topics/VolumeII/ConstructionStormwaterBMPs/ConstructionRunoffBMPs/BMPc241.htm?Highlight=sediment%20pond [civils, pg 3]
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide pipe diameter, material and slope. Include rip-rap at the discharge point to the swale. [civils, pg 3]
|
|
See Document Markup
The contours shown on this site plan do not appear to direct stormwater runoff to the proposed swale. Revise accordingly. [civils, pg 3]
|
|
See Document Markup
Make a note that dewatering is anticipated as the seasonal high groundwater elevation was determined to be 2.5' below the existing ground surface. [civils, pg 3]
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide a sizing calculation for the proposed voltclarex oil filter per the 2019 DOE manual. [civils, pg 4]
|
|
See Document Markup
Reference keynote 9/13 for flow control manhole. [civils, pg 4]
|
|
See Document Markup
Remove additional linework. [civils, pg 2]
|
|
See Document Markup
Within the proposed utility easement provide the legal description of easement area in question. [easement, pg 4]
|
|
See Document Markup
For exhibit B, provide a map showing the site and proposed utility easement. [easement, pg 5]
|
|
See Document Markup
City standard 01.05.04 requires a minimum 12' mast arm and the front of the fixture to be 3' minimum from the face of the curb. [civils, pg 6]
|
|
See Document Markup
Revise Street Planter note to state trees to be installed behind sidewalk. This detail conflicts with the landscape plan. [civils, pg 8]
|
|
See Document Markup
This soil amendment detail is also on page 9, one of them can be removed. [civils, pg 12]
|
|
See Document Markup
Fill out and submit the Engineering Cost estimate for the next re-submittal. : https://www.cityofpuyallup.org/DocumentCenter/View/1403/Cost-Estimate. [civils, pg 1]
|
|
See Document Markup
Figure III-1.1 Runoff Treatment BMP Selection flow chart was not included in the report. [drainage report, pg 11]
|
|
|
Public Works Water Review
|
Failed
|
11/15/2023
|
11/07/2023
|
|
|
|
See Document Markup
CIVIL PLANS Sheet C5: Change sheet title to Grading, Drainage, Sewer, and Water Plan
|
|
See Document Markup
CIVIL PLANS Sheet C5: Fire hydrant needs its own 6-inch gate valve and hydrant run off the 8-inch water main run. Relocate the 8-inch water main to the east enough to support a 2-foot hydrant run, a 6-inch gate valve, and an 8-inch MJ x 6-inch Fl tee with an 8-inch MJ plug to the north.
|
|
See Document Markup
CIVIL PLANS Sheet C5: The domestic water service meter size is not called out. To eliminate an additional service crossing on Inter Ave, tap the proposed 8-inch water main and set the water service meter at the back of sidewalk, as far to the west as possible to avoid large truck off-tracking. Install the above ground RPBA - not DCVA 3-feet north of meter. RPBA size should match water meter size. Run appropriate size poly pipe from back of RPBA to building.
|
|
See Document Markup
Civil RESUB C4: Leader for proposed water main is pointing to service line instead of water main.
|
|
See Document Markup
Civil RESUB C4: Relocate RPBA to the south out of the slope.
|
|
See Document Markup
Civil RESUB C4: Show irrigation on the civil plans. If irrigation will be off the domestic water line, show the irrigation tee between the meter setter and RPBA. Place the irrigation DCVA directly downstream of tee.
|
|
See Document Markup
Civil RESUB C4: A water cleanout is not a recognized water feature. remove from plans, as it is not needed.
|
|
See Document Markup
Civil RESUB C4: Tee is misspelled. 1-8-inch MJ cap should be 1-8-inch MJ plug.
|
|
See Document Markup
Civil RESUB C5: See water comments on sheet C4.
|
|
See Document Markup
Civil RESUB C8: Remove this detail from this sheet. It is already on sheet C10.
|
|
See Document Markup
Civil resub Sheet C4: Remove this symbol that was called water clean out.
|
|
See Document Markup
Civil resub Sheet C4: The City does not allow deduct meters. Remove this water meter from the irrigation line. If you want the irrigation line to be metered, it will need it's own water service tap separate from the domestic service.
|
|
See Document Markup
Civil resub Sheet C5: Remove this water clean out from this project.
|
|
|
Public Works Streets Review
|
Approved
|
11/15/2023
|
11/07/2023
|
|
|
|
See Document Markup
This should be our current standard: compacted base, 10" sub base material, 2" crushed surfacing and 4" HMA...6" HMA from our arterial standard preferred pg 8
|
|
See Document Markup
should be 4" min, prefer 6" min, heavy truck traffic pg 9
|
|
See Document Markup
use standard 01.01.05
6" min HMA thickness
truck traffic C8 SH
|
|
See Document Markup
Prefer standard 01.02.19 pg 6
|
|
|
Public Works Collection Review
|
Approved
|
11/15/2023
|
10/31/2023
|
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Prefer standard 01.02.19 pg 6
|
|
See Document Markup
This much of a slope may cause odor issues, reduce if possible. [civils, pg 4]
|
|
See Document Markup
If not installing a manhole at this location, change cleanout to an 8 inch two way structure. [civils, pg 4]
|
|
|
Planning Review
|
Failed
|
11/15/2023
|
10/30/2023
|
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
The proposed filling of the wetland shall be fully mitigated in accordance with any conditions from the state Department of Ecology and/or U.S. Army Corps (USACE). This exemption does not relieve the applicant/property owner from permits required by the state Department of Ecology and/or U.S. Army Corps (USACE). The applicant/property owner shall provide proof of applicable approvals, exemptions and/or permits obtained from the state Department of Ecology and/or U.S. Army Corps (USACE) prior to the city approving any construction permits for the subject fill action (PMC 21.06.910(4)(e)). The city will also require proof if the state Department of Ecology and/or U.S. Army Corps (USACE) does not grant approval for the filling of the wetland in order to issue an approval of the site plan that corresponds with the denial of filling the wetland prior to the city approving any construction permits.
Please resubmit with the decision made by the Department of Ecology and/or U.S. Army Corps (USACE).
|
|
|
Engineering Traffic Review
|
Approved
|
11/15/2023
|
10/25/2023
|
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
Based on existing pavement conditions of Inter Ave, half-street paving will be required.
7/28/23 - See Engineering comment on Civils pg 6 - Show half street improvement transition past road centerline
|
|
|
Fire Review
|
Approved
|
11/15/2023
|
10/17/2023
|
|
|
|
|
Planning Review
|
Failed
|
08/14/2023
|
08/14/2023
|
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Trees are required to be planted at least 10 feet away from water lines per the VMS. Please substitute the proposed trees that do not meet this setback with ground cover and shrubs [LS Set, L1]
|
|
Final Landscape Plan - Soil Req. Cubic Yards
Please estimate the total top soil required to meet the 8 inch minimum soil standard for all landscaped areas in cubic yards. The contractor will be required to submit delivery sheets and demonstrate compliance with top soil required and specified on plans at the time of final inspection.
|
|
Final Landscape Plan - Native Plants
A minimum of 25 percent of the shrubs and ground covers used in projects under the requirements of the PMC and the VMS shall be native to the Puget Sound region. Please call out natives on the plant schedule for easy identification.
|
|
Final Landscape Plan - Stormwater Facilities
Storm water facilities, including bioretention areas, swales, and raingardens, shall be landscaped in accordance with SLD-02, contained in the Vegetation Management Standards Manual (VMS).
|
|
Final Landscape Plan - Sight Distance Standards
Sight Distance standards. Adjacent to public rights-of-way and points of access, no fences or landscape material at maturity, shall exceed three (3) feet above the local finish grade within a clear sight triangle. Please spec plants that meet this standard and, please show the sight distance area on the plans. The proposed flowering cherry trees on either end of the access area may be in the sight distance trianble and the proposed tall Oregon grape may need to be switched out with another shrub in the sight distance area due to its mature growth height of 6'.
|
|
Final Landscape Plan - Landscape Types
The City's Vegetation Management Standards Manual (VMS) outlines specific treatment “types” that are required to be adhered to, dependent upon the yard area the landscaping is located within. See the VMS, sections 13 and 14 for full details. The VMS can be downloaded here: https://www.cityofpuyallup.org/puyallupvms
|
|
Final Landscape Plan - Trash Containers
All trash containers shall be screened from abutting properties and public rights-of-way by substantial sight-obscuring landscaping. Sight-obscuring fences and walls can be substituted for plant materials.
|
|
Final Landscape Plan - Entire site landscaping
All portions of a lot not devoted to building, future building, parking, access drives, walks, storage or accessory uses shall be landscaped with trees and shrub cover.
|
|
Final Landscape Plan - Street Tree Site Prep
Street tree soil requirements. See section 8.2 of the VMS. Copy and paste the applicable section for street tree top soil and place on plans as requirement to meet the city standards. Root barriers, in accordance with city standards, are required for all street trees. A minimum of 8’ of linear protection along the edge of the sidewalk adjacent to the street tree shall be provided, using a minimum 24” deep root barrier panels. See city standards #01.02.07 and #01.02.03 for further details.
Please be aware of the following standards in the VMS and Public Works Engineering and Construction Standards (found here: www.cityofpuyallup.org/1445/100---Roadway ) as they apply to street trees:
Integrate city standard detail 01.02.03 – root barrier detail.
Integrate city standard detail 01.02.07 – street tree planting detail.
Section 8.3 of the VMS requires (4”) of organic compost mulch or wood chips.
Integrate city standard detail 01.02.08a – soil amendment and depth.
NOTE: Top soil placement/installation specs, depth and quality standards can be found in section 8.2 of the VMS.
For new construction, cut and paste ALL of section 8.2(b) of the VMS into the planting notes/details of the final landscape plan sheets.
Section 12.3 (d) specifies minimum size and plant quality requirements. 1” DBH minimum for most new street trees.
Integrate the Street Tree Installation Standards Table (page 25 of the VMS) into plan sets. Please observe required spacing standards, as outlined in the table, when preparing drawings. The city has required species mix requirements based on the quantity of street trees to be planted as a part of the project.
See section 12.6 of the VMS for more information. Some common species of street trees are prohibited due to overuse and other reasons. Please check section 12.11 when specifying species to be planted.
The city’s policy is to plant the largest canopy tree for the rooting/overhead space available (section 12.4, VMS). Please note this when specifying tree species for the planter strip.
|
|
Final Landscape Plan - Street Tree Selection
Section 12.11 of the VMS lists prohibited street tree species. All tree selection shall follow the concept of ‘right-tree, right-place’; the largest tree should be used for the rooting and overhead space available to improve overall canopy coverage throughout the city. Select street tree species based on available planter strip with and availability of overhead canopy area. If over head power exists on the front of the site; please choose from the Class I trees in the VMS. A mixture of street tree species generally shall be provided throughout site-specific developments to provide visual interest and to ensure that a mixture of tree species are used throughout the city, as follows:
A. For projects involving sixteen (16) or more street trees, at least four (4) different trees (all differing genus) shall be used. Where a 10’ planter strip or larger exists or is being provided, a minimum of 25 percent of these trees shall be evergreen conifer.
To prevent uniform disease susceptibility and eventual uniform senescence, no single species or cultivar shall make up more than 10 percent of the total City street tree population; no more than 20 percent of the total City street tree population shall be composed of one genus and no more than 30 percent of any one family. The Director may limit or adjust the required species mix on a given site, project, or area of the city if the proposed species presently or with the addition of the proposed trees would constitute over 15 percent of the total city-wide street tree species mix.
|
|
Miscellaneous Planning Correction
As noted in the preliminary site plan comments, a consolidated internal parking lot landscaping area will be required per PMC 20.58.005 (1). Please ensure that in the resubmittal of both the preliminary site plan and the civil permit application that the consolidated landscape area meets the required distance from utilities per the VMS street tree installation standards table in VMS Chapter 12.4. [LS Set, L1]
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
Landscaping islands apply to all striped parking and storage areas, including heavy truck trailer parking. For large, paved areas which trigger parking lot landscaping under PMC 20.58.005, but may not contain vehicle striping for vehicle parking, staff will use reasonable discretion and flexibility in site designing to allow larger consolidated/ grouped islands to spread out evenly through the paved areas, ensuring landscaping meets the intent of the type IV design standards and meets the minimum landscape requirements in PMC 20.58.005.
Though parking lot landscape islands are not proposed due to the truck parking area not being striped, there is a requirement that all paved areas over 10,000SF shall have at least 5% of all paved surfaces to be landscaped. Perimeter landscaping shall not be calculated as part of the require amount of internal parking lot landscaping. You can propose a Type IV consolidated parking lot landscape area(s) to meet this 5% landscaped area requirement.
- Please include the calculation showing that 5% of all paved surfaces are landscaped (this cannot include perimeter landscaping).
Per PMC 20.58.005 (1) All paved areas of over 10,000 square feet shall have at least five percent of all paved areas landscaped to provide shade to reduce the heat island effect related to paved surfaces, reduce storm water runoff, improve air quality, provide visual breaks to large paved areas and improve general appearance. Perimeter landscaping shall not be calculated as part of the required amount of internal parking lot landscaping. Internal parking lot landscaping design and spacing shall conform to the “Type IV” landscaping standards contained in the city’s vegetation management standards (VMS) manual. In order to further mitigate the impacts of more substantial expanses of paved areas on development sites, the following shall apply: (a) In the event that a project provides 20 percent more than the required minimum number of parking stalls (per PMC 20.55.010) for a specific use or group of uses on a development complex site, or in the event that the total sum of paved areas on a site exceeds 100,000 square feet, at least 10 percent of all paved areas shall be landscaped in accordance with this section and the vegetation management standards (VMS) manual.
[landscape plan, L1]
|
|
See Document Markup
Please include the proposed parking stalls on the civil plan application [LS Set, L1]
|
|
See Document Markup
No tree plantings are allowed within 5 from hydrants [LS Set, L1]
|
|
See Document Markup
The existing 6' chain-link fences will need to be replaced or upgraded to be sight-obscuring fencing per PMC 20.35.035 (3). Fences may not exceed 8' in height. [LS Set, L1]
|
|
See Document Markup
Per PMC 20.35.035, sight-obscuring fencing is required around all portions of a lot utilized for outdoor storage. A fence is required along the southern property line (along Inter Ave.) to screen the outdoor storage. The maximum fence size is 8'. Any fence greater than 6' in height will require a building permit. The fence will be required to meet the 20' front yard setback. See PMC 20.35.035 (3) for full performance standards. [LS Set, L1]
|
|
See Document Markup
12', Type II perimeter landscaping is required along the front property line along Inter Ave. In addition to this 12' perimeter landscaping requirement, we are requiring street trees be planted back of walk to address the requirement for street trees for frontage improvements. The plans appear to propose this, but please clarify that there is 12' for perimeter landscaping and additional area that is used for back of walk street tree planting. [LS Set, L1]
|
|
See Document Markup
Landscaping along the front property line is required to be Type IIb landscaping. Type III landscaping is only used for interior side yards. Please see Chapter 14.2 of the VMS for more information regarding the landscape requirements for Type IIb landscaping and make changes to the plans accordingly. [LS Set, L1]
|
|
See Document Markup
This proposed tree is too close to the SD line. [LS Set, L1]
|
|
|
Public Works Collection Review
|
Failed
|
08/14/2023
|
08/11/2023
|
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Existing catch basin, in current gravel driveway is not reflected on plans. This structure will need to be removed and replaced to the curb line. Place between gutter crossing and ADA ramping to keep new pipe crossing as perpendicular as possible [Civil Plans; C6]
|
|
See Document Markup
Existing 8 inch storm pipe will need to be replaced with 12 inch, from new catch basin to the existing. [Civil Plans; C6]
|
|
See Document Markup
The existing concrete sanitary lateral tap for the house on site is located 3.5 feet east of the manhole. This lateral should be renewed to current standards and not replaced with a new tap. Reference water division comments about relocation of proposed residential connection. [Civil Plans; C6]
|
|
See Document Markup
All existing sanitary main along this project is 8 inch concrete. [Civil Plans; C6]
|
|
See Document Markup
Prefer standard 01.02.19 pg 6
|
|
See Document Markup
This much of a slope may cause odor issues, reduce if possible. [civils, pg 4]
|
|
See Document Markup
If not installing a manhole at this location, change cleanout to an 8 inch two way structure. [civils, pg 4]
|
|
|
Public Works Water Review
|
Failed
|
08/14/2023
|
08/08/2023
|
|
|
|
See Document Markup
CIVIL PLANS Sheet C5: Change sheet title to Grading, Drainage, Sewer, and Water Plan
|
|
See Document Markup
CIVIL PLANS Sheet C5: Fire hydrant needs its own 6-inch gate valve and hydrant run off the 8-inch water main run. Relocate the 8-inch water main to the east enough to support a 2-foot hydrant run, a 6-inch gate valve, and an 8-inch MJ x 6-inch Fl tee with an 8-inch MJ plug to the north.
|
|
See Document Markup
CIVIL PLANS Sheet C5: The domestic water service meter size is not called out. To eliminate an additional service crossing on Inter Ave, tap the proposed 8-inch water main and set the water service meter at the back of sidewalk, as far to the west as possible to avoid large truck off-tracking. Install the above ground RPBA - not DCVA 3-feet north of meter. RPBA size should match water meter size. Run appropriate size poly pipe from back of RPBA to building.
|
|
See Document Markup
CIVIL PLANS Sheet C6: The domestic water service meter size is not called out. To eliminate an additional service crossing on Inter Ave, tap the proposed 8-inch water main and set the water service meter at the back of sidewalk, as far to the west as possible to avoid large truck off-tracking. Install the above ground RPBA - not DCVA 3-feet north of meter. RPBA size should match water meter size.
|
|
See Document Markup
CIVIL PLANS Sheet C6: The 8-inch wet tap will need to be shifted to the east to make room for a fire hydrant run - see comment on Sheet C5. If this does not allow room for the water meter to be set at back of sidewalk, 8-inch 45-degree bends will need to be installed north of the water service tap.
|
|
See Document Markup
CIVIL PLANS Sheet C6: Show the existing water service to be abandoned.
|
|
See Document Markup
CIVIL PLANS Sheet C6: Is an irrigation service needed for this site? If so, call out the size and location of the meter. Protect with the same size DCVA. If irrigation will come off the domestic water service, install the irrigation tee between the meter and RPBA and protect the irrigation line with a DCVA.
|
|
See Document Markup
CIVIL PLANS Sheet C11: Select the water meter size and remove the standard detail not needed.
|
|
See Document Markup
CIVIL PLANS Sheet C11: If irrigation will be added to this plan set, keep this detail. Add or replace with City Standard detail 03.04.02 2-inch or smaller RPBA installation for the domestic service.
|
|
See Document Markup
1969LSE LS SET Sheet L1: No trees within 10-feet of any water main.
|
|
See Document Markup
Civil RESUB C4: Leader for proposed water main is pointing to service line instead of water main.
|
|
See Document Markup
Civil RESUB C4: Relocate RPBA to the south out of the slope.
|
|
See Document Markup
Civil RESUB C4: Show irrigation on the civil plans. If irrigation will be off the domestic water line, show the irrigation tee between the meter setter and RPBA. Place the irrigation DCVA directly downstream of tee.
|
|
See Document Markup
Civil RESUB C4: A water cleanout is not a recognized water feature. remove from plans, as it is not needed.
|
|
See Document Markup
Civil RESUB C4: Tee is misspelled. 1-8-inch MJ cap should be 1-8-inch MJ plug.
|
|
See Document Markup
Civil RESUB C5: See water comments on sheet C4.
|
|
See Document Markup
Civil RESUB C8: Remove this detail from this sheet. It is already on sheet C10.
|
|
|
Public Works Streets Review
|
Failed
|
08/14/2023
|
08/07/2023
|
|
|
|
See Document Markup
This should be our current standard: compacted base, 10" sub base material, 2" crushed surfacing and 4" HMA...6" HMA from our arterial standard preferred pg 8
|
|
See Document Markup
should be 4" min, prefer 6" min, heavy truck traffic pg 9
|
|
See Document Markup
use standard 01.01.05
6" min HMA thickness
truck traffic C8 SH
|
|
|
Engineering Civil Review
|
Failed
|
08/14/2023
|
08/04/2023
|
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Include the engineering approval block on the plan sheets. [civils, pg 1]
|
|
See Document Markup
See all prelminary site plan comments and update the civil plans accordingly. [civils, pg 1]
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide proposed cut and fill amounts. [civils, pg 1]
|
|
See Document Markup
Revise note 1 to reference CS 01.02.0a on sheet C13. [civils, pg 3]
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide a legend for the plan set. Be sure to include existing and proposed linetypes and hatches. [civils, pg 3]
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide a plan for temporary stormwater mitigation to detain stormwater flows equal to the 100 year/24 hour storm event. [civils, pg 3]
|
|
See Document Markup
Include the name of the abutting street. [civils, pg 5]
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide invert elevations for the sewer connection to the main, cleanouts and connection to the proposed building. [civils, pg 5]
|
|
See Document Markup
Include the existing and proposed contours on grading sheet. [civils, pg 5]
|
|
See Document Markup
Place a structure at the bend of this storm pipe. [civils, pg 5]
|
|
See Document Markup
Per city standard stormwater pipe shall be only PVC, concrete, Ductile Iron or dual walled polypropylene. Revise the proposed CPEP pipe. [civils, pg 5]
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide a detail for the proposed Contech water quality system. [civils, pg 14]
|
|
See Document Markup
Revise the white hatch to grey to show match the rest of the proposed asphalt. [civils, pg 6]
|
|
See Document Markup
Clearly show the edges of the property boundary lines. [civils, pg 6]
|
|
See Document Markup
Show the extents of the right of way. Include the Inter Ave roadway name. [civils, pg 6]
|
|
See Document Markup
create a zoomed in section view of both proposed ADA ramps. Include spot elevations at all corners of the landing and ramp. Ensure a 2% cross slope and maximum 8.33% run slope. [civils, pg 6]
|
|
See Document Markup
Continue the sidewalk straight along Inter Ave. Remove this transition. [civils, pg 6]
|
|
See Document Markup
Create a note on this detail and frontage plans that states the trees will be installed at the back of the sidewalk. [civils, pg 9]
|
|
See Document Markup
It does not appear that the porous pavement overflow detail is proposed or applicable to this project. Revise accordingly. [civils, pg 9]
|
|
See Document Markup
Show the half street improvement transition past the road centerline per CS 01.01.19 on the plan view. [civils, pg 6]
|
|
See Document Markup
Continue the sidewalk straight along this section.[civils, pg 6]
|
|
See Document Markup
Relocate the arrow to existing water meter for construction note 16. [civils, pg 6]
|
|
See Document Markup
The city is requiring these street trees to be at the back of the proposed sidewalk. See planning's comments. [civils, pg 6]
|
|
See Document Markup
Reference that these are City of Puyallup roadway plan notes. [civils, pg 9]
|
|
See Document Markup
Detail 11 and 13 on this sheet are illegible. [civils, pg 10]
|
|
See Document Markup
A portion of the water system notes are illegible. [civils, pg 11]
|
|
See Document Markup
Show the commercial side sewer connection with sampling connection per city standard 04.03.04 [civils, pg 5]
|
|
See Document Markup
The dimensions of this stormtech detail 2 are illegible. [civils, pg 13]
|
|
See Document Markup
Dimension the propoosed stormtech detention system. [civils, pg 5]
|
|
See Document Markup
Show catch basins within the right of way which will require inlet protection. [civils, pg 3]
|
|
See Document Markup
Groundwater was determined to be 2.5' below the existing ground surface during the wet season. The proposed detention vault excavation will require dewatering. Show the location of proposed baker tanks for dewatering. [civils, pg 3]
|
|
See Document Markup
Show the temporary excavation proposed for the stormtech chambers. [civils. pg 3]
|
|
See Document Markup
Show the connection from the roof downspouts to the stormtech chamber. This area is considered non pollution generating and may bypass the water quality filter. [civils, pg 5]
|
|
See Document Markup
Proposed? [civils, pg 6]
|
|
See Document Markup
Show minimum gutter slope flow to be 0.5% for the proposed curb. [civils, pg 6]
|
|
See Document Markup
Revise overlapped text within the profile view. [civils, pg 6]
|
|
See Document Markup
It appears a gutter drain catch basin is warranted on the west side of the frontage to collect stormwater gutter runoff. [civils, pg 6]
|
|
See Document Markup
Will this be 9" or greater? [civils, pg 14]
|
|
See Document Markup
Define the required sump depth. [civils. pg 14]
|
|
See Document Markup
Will the flow control structure be installed within the stormtech chamber area or a downstream structure? Provide clarity and a detail for the proposed notch and orifice elevation and size. If located downstream, utilize city standard 02.01.07. [civils, pg 14]
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide a parts breakdown list for the number of chambers and endcaps required for installation of the stormtech system. [civils, pg 14]
|
|
See Document Markup
Revise the reference for soil amendment from the 2021 Pierce County Stormwater manual to either CS 01.02.08a or the 2019 DOE manual for Western Washington. [D Report]
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide a basin map visually showing these values in Table 1. [D Report, pg 7]
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide 2019 DOE flow charts for MR 5, MR 6 and MR 8 as described in the preliminary site plan PLLPSP20220172 review. [D Report, pg 14]
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide a basin map providing proposed pervious and impervious areas. [D Report, pg 23]
|
|
See Document Markup
Table 1 of this report states the the proposed landscape is 20,150SF which is 0.46acres. Revise this area. [D Report, pg 26]
|
|
See Document Markup
Table 1 of this report state the asphalt parking is 55,450SF which is 1.27 acres. What is the additional area representing? [D report, pg 26]
|
|
See Document Markup
It does not appear that the minimum requirement for the flow control standard has been met via this continuous modeling. [D Report, pg 37]
|
|
See Document Markup
Size the contech water quality device per minimum requirement 6 the 2019 DOE manual. [D report, pg 39]
|
|
See Document Markup
Revise the O&M manual information to refer to the 2019 DOE manual. [D Report, pg 66]
|
|
See Document Markup
Include a comment response letter addressing the city's markups in the resubmittal. [civils, pg 1]
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide a downstream analysis showing the conveyance system has capacity for the 25-year, 24 hours storm event. [D Report, pg 10]
|
|
See Document Markup
There is no MR 10 within the 2019 DOE manual. Remove this section. [D Report, pg 11]
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide a downstream analysis showing the conveyance system has capacity for the 25-year, 24 hours storm event. [D Report, pg 13]
|
|
See Document Markup
Date the stamp during the next submission. [civils, pg 1
|
|
See Document Markup
Show proposed parking striping on this sheet. [civils, pg 2]
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide an energy dissipater BMP to inhibit erosion of the swale for the water discharged to this swale. [civils, pg 5]
|
|
See Document Markup
Show the existing catch basin that is located just off-site that will collect the stormwater runoff discharged to this swale. The CB was installed per civil permit E-20-0137. [civils, pg 5]
|
|
See Document Markup
Show proposed improvements within the right of way on this sheet. [civils, pg 2]
|
|
See Document Markup
Show street lights along Inter Ave. [civils, pg 2]
|
|
See Document Markup
This type of inlet protection is not appropriate for use in the public right of way vehicular lane. Provide a silt sock detail instead. [civils, pg 3]
|
|
See Document Markup
Show existing contours/spot elevations on the tesc sheet. [civils, pg 3]
|
|
See Document Markup
Indicate that the domestic water and sewage is served by the City of Puyallup. [civils, pg 1]
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide a detail for the proposed baker tank. Be sure to include the dimensions and volume. [civils, pg 3]
|
|
See Document Markup
Show existing and proposed grading contours/spot elevations on this sheet. Add the linetypes to the legend. [civils, pg 3]
|
|
See Document Markup
Show proposed stockpile location. [civils, pg 3]
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide a design for managing stormwater runoff when the site is stripped/graded. [civils, pg 3]
|
|
See Document Markup
Show the proposed swale on the plans and provide a detail. [civils, pg 3]
|
|
See Document Markup
Clearly show the existing sewer within Inter Ave. [civils, pg 4]
|
|
See Document Markup
Revise the sewer connection to the manhole to be a sewer main tap per city standard 04.02.01 on sheet C9. [site plan, pg 4]
|
|
See Document Markup
Indicate that the proposed sewer service is private. [civils, pg 4]
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide a commercial side sewer sampling connection per city standard 04.03.04. Be sure to include this detail on a separate sheet. [civils, pg 4]
|
|
See Document Markup
City standard 03.03.01 requires the water service be 1" poly pipe that is high density poly meeting ASTM D-2239-SIDR 7.
|
|
See Document Markup
Number and Provide rim elevations for the SSCO's. [civils, pg 4]
|
|
See Document Markup
PVC sewer pipe requires 3' of cover. Include additional information showing the depth for the proposed sewer service. [civils, pg 4]
|
|
See Document Markup
Show the proposed irrigation meter and DCVA. [civils, pg 4]
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide water service length, diameter and material. [civils, pg 4]
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide the utility crossing information to ensure there are no conflicts. [civils, pg 4]
|
|
See Document Markup
What is this SD linetype along the eastern portion of the site representing? [civils, pg 4]
|
|
See Document Markup
Include city standard 03.01.03-2. [civils, pg 7]
|
|
See Document Markup
What is this line representing? [civils, pg 4]
|
|
See Document Markup
City standards require 3' of cover for dual walled polypropylene. Provide additional cover or revise pipe material to ductile iron. [civils, pg 4]
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide pipe length, material and slope from proposed building to the detention system. [civils, pg 4]
|
|
See Document Markup
Include city standard detail 02.03.02 on the plans. [civils, pg 7]
|
|
See Document Markup
Include the proposed sidewalk hard surfaces as a bypass for the project. This should be included as it is a common plan of development as specified by DOE. [drainage report, pg 23]
|
|
See Document Markup
80,436SF equates to 1.85 acres. Revise the pre and post developed basin sizes to match the table 1 on page 7 and map on page 23. [drainage report, pg 23]
|
|
See Document Markup
The roof to area defined on the plans is 4800SF ie .110 acres. Revise the mitigated roof impervious area in the WWHM calculation. [drainage report, pg 29]
|
|
See Document Markup
Include figure III-1.1 Runoff Treatment BMP Selection Flow Chart. [drainage plans, pg 12]
|
|
See Document Markup
Label this as figure 5. [drainage report, pg 23]
|
|
See Document Markup
20 endcaps are proposed on the plans. [drainage report, pg 31]
|
|
See Document Markup
Define the lid types for the proposed CB's. Vaned grate or solid lid. [civils, pg 4]
|
|
See Document Markup
The maximum grade shown on sheet 4 nearby the detention system is 64' revise this information. [civils, pg 12]
|
|
See Document Markup
Per sheet 4 of the plans, the project intends to use an internal flow control manhole to the detention system. If this is the case, this detail can be removed. [civils, pg 13]
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide additional information regarding the flow control manhole orifice and elevation. [civils, pg 13]
|
|
See Document Markup
Reference sheet 14 for the sidewalk ramp as well [civils, pg 5]
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide the city a draft 10' utility easement for maintenance of the junction boxes and street lights for the city to review. The draft form can be found here: https://www.cityofpuyallup.org/DocumentCenter/View/7331/Appendix-C-?bidId= [civils, pg 6]
|
|
See Document Markup
This keynote 14 reference does not appear to be an 8" fire line, but rather the domestic service to the building. [civils, pg 5]
|
|
See Document Markup
What are these lines representing? [civils, pg 5]
|
|
See Document Markup
The location of the sawcut is not clear, provide a an outline of the full depth cut and street patch on the south side of the inter ave centerline. [civils, pg 5]
|
|
See Document Markup
Place this proposed catch basin within the gutter line rather than the travel lane. [civils, pg 5]
|
|
See Document Markup
The proposed 12" reinforced concrete pipe is proposing to flow upstream. Provide a minimum 0.5% slope downstream. [civils, pg 5]
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide spot elevations along the driveway approach showing the sidewalk is installed at a minimum 2% cross-slope. [civils, pg 5]
|
|
See Document Markup
City records show this sewer main is concrete. [civils, pg 5]
|
|
See Document Markup
What are these lines representing? [civils, pg 5]
|
|
See Document Markup
The plan view does not show a 12" storm main being installed between stations 0+75.00 and 3+60.00. Is this the existing storm main on the south side of Inter Ave? [civils, pg 5]
|
|
See Document Markup
Define the curb radius for the driveway approach. [civils, pg 5]
|
|
See Document Markup
Show the 3' cross gutter as outline in city standard 01.02.19. [civils, pg 5]
|
|
See Document Markup
Revise to 2525 Inter Ave. [civils, pg 6]
|
|
See Document Markup
Create a note on this detail and frontage plans that states the trees will be installed at the back of the sidewalk. [civils, pg 8]
|
|
See Document Markup
Include city standard 04.03.04 commercial side sewer connection with sampling connection. [civils, pg 12]
|
|
See Document Markup
Show spot elevations. [civils, pg 14]
|
|
See Document Markup
Include a detail for the proposed fence. [civils, pg 2]
|
|
See Document Markup
Design standard 208.1(10) requires the interior floor to be slope to a type 1 catch basin and plumbed to sanitary sewer. Show this on the plans. [civils, pg 2]
|
|
See Document Markup
Connect the roof downspout of the trash enclosure to the proposed detention system. [civils, pg 2]
|
|
See Document Markup
Include figure III-1.1 Runoff Treatment BMP Selection Flow Chart. [drainage plans, pg 11]
|
|
See Document Markup
Include a section providing the calculation showing that MR 6 is met for the proposed inline CDS . [drainage plans, pg 11]
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide additional information as to how the conduit will be connected to the service cabinet. Will this be done via trench or boring? [civils, pg 6]
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide an option 2 narrative within the storm report. How much additional hard surfaces would be proposed? [civils, pg 2]
|
|
|
Engineering Traffic Review
|
Failed
|
08/14/2023
|
08/01/2023
|
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
Show preliminary locations of City standard streetlights. Streetlights must be placed outside ADA wheelchair ramp area. City preference is to have street light base completely outside the ramp and sidewalk.
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
Show frontage design with 8ft sidewalks with street trees behind sidewalk.
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
Based on existing pavement conditions of Inter Ave, half-street paving will be required.
7/28/23 - See Engineering comment on Civils pg 6 - Show half street improvement transition past road centerline
|
|
|
Fire Review
|
Approved
|
08/14/2023
|
07/18/2023
|
|
|
|
|
Public Works Streets Review
|
Failed
|
05/02/2023
|
05/09/2023
|
|
|
|
See Document Markup
This should be our current standard: compacted base, 10" sub base material, 2" crushed surfacing and 4" HMA...6" HMA from our arterial standard preferred pg 8
|
|
See Document Markup
should be 4" min, prefer 6" min, heavy truck traffic pg 9
|
|
|
Planning Review
|
Failed
|
05/02/2023
|
05/03/2023
|
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Trees are required to be planted at least 10 feet away from water lines per the VMS. Please substitute the proposed trees that do not meet this setback with ground cover and shrubs [LS Set, L1]
|
|
Final Landscape Plan - Soil Req. Cubic Yards
Please estimate the total top soil required to meet the 8 inch minimum soil standard for all landscaped areas in cubic yards. The contractor will be required to submit delivery sheets and demonstrate compliance with top soil required and specified on plans at the time of final inspection.
|
|
Final Landscape Plan - Native Plants
A minimum of 25 percent of the shrubs and ground covers used in projects under the requirements of the PMC and the VMS shall be native to the Puget Sound region. Please call out natives on the plant schedule for easy identification.
|
|
Final Landscape Plan - Stormwater Facilities
Storm water facilities, including bioretention areas, swales, and raingardens, shall be landscaped in accordance with SLD-02, contained in the Vegetation Management Standards Manual (VMS).
|
|
Final Landscape Plan - Sight Distance Standards
Sight Distance standards. Adjacent to public rights-of-way and points of access, no fences or landscape material at maturity, shall exceed three (3) feet above the local finish grade within a clear sight triangle. Please spec plants that meet this standard and, please show the sight distance area on the plans. The proposed flowering cherry trees on either end of the access area may be in the sight distance trianble and the proposed tall Oregon grape may need to be switched out with another shrub in the sight distance area due to its mature growth height of 6'.
|
|
Final Landscape Plan - Landscape Types
The City's Vegetation Management Standards Manual (VMS) outlines specific treatment “types” that are required to be adhered to, dependent upon the yard area the landscaping is located within. See the VMS, sections 13 and 14 for full details. The VMS can be downloaded here: https://www.cityofpuyallup.org/puyallupvms
|
|
Final Landscape Plan - Trash Containers
All trash containers shall be screened from abutting properties and public rights-of-way by substantial sight-obscuring landscaping. Sight-obscuring fences and walls can be substituted for plant materials.
|
|
Final Landscape Plan - Entire site landscaping
All portions of a lot not devoted to building, future building, parking, access drives, walks, storage or accessory uses shall be landscaped with trees and shrub cover.
|
|
Final Landscape Plan - Street Tree Site Prep
Street tree soil requirements. See section 8.2 of the VMS. Copy and paste the applicable section for street tree top soil and place on plans as requirement to meet the city standards. Root barriers, in accordance with city standards, are required for all street trees. A minimum of 8’ of linear protection along the edge of the sidewalk adjacent to the street tree shall be provided, using a minimum 24” deep root barrier panels. See city standards #01.02.07 and #01.02.03 for further details.
Please be aware of the following standards in the VMS and Public Works Engineering and Construction Standards (found here: www.cityofpuyallup.org/1445/100---Roadway ) as they apply to street trees:
Integrate city standard detail 01.02.03 – root barrier detail.
Integrate city standard detail 01.02.07 – street tree planting detail.
Section 8.3 of the VMS requires (4”) of organic compost mulch or wood chips.
Integrate city standard detail 01.02.08a – soil amendment and depth.
NOTE: Top soil placement/installation specs, depth and quality standards can be found in section 8.2 of the VMS.
For new construction, cut and paste ALL of section 8.2(b) of the VMS into the planting notes/details of the final landscape plan sheets.
Section 12.3 (d) specifies minimum size and plant quality requirements. 1” DBH minimum for most new street trees.
Integrate the Street Tree Installation Standards Table (page 25 of the VMS) into plan sets. Please observe required spacing standards, as outlined in the table, when preparing drawings. The city has required species mix requirements based on the quantity of street trees to be planted as a part of the project.
See section 12.6 of the VMS for more information. Some common species of street trees are prohibited due to overuse and other reasons. Please check section 12.11 when specifying species to be planted.
The city’s policy is to plant the largest canopy tree for the rooting/overhead space available (section 12.4, VMS). Please note this when specifying tree species for the planter strip.
|
|
Final Landscape Plan - Street Tree Selection
Section 12.11 of the VMS lists prohibited street tree species. All tree selection shall follow the concept of ‘right-tree, right-place’; the largest tree should be used for the rooting and overhead space available to improve overall canopy coverage throughout the city. Select street tree species based on available planter strip with and availability of overhead canopy area. If over head power exists on the front of the site; please choose from the Class I trees in the VMS. A mixture of street tree species generally shall be provided throughout site-specific developments to provide visual interest and to ensure that a mixture of tree species are used throughout the city, as follows:
A. For projects involving sixteen (16) or more street trees, at least four (4) different trees (all differing genus) shall be used. Where a 10’ planter strip or larger exists or is being provided, a minimum of 25 percent of these trees shall be evergreen conifer.
To prevent uniform disease susceptibility and eventual uniform senescence, no single species or cultivar shall make up more than 10 percent of the total City street tree population; no more than 20 percent of the total City street tree population shall be composed of one genus and no more than 30 percent of any one family. The Director may limit or adjust the required species mix on a given site, project, or area of the city if the proposed species presently or with the addition of the proposed trees would constitute over 15 percent of the total city-wide street tree species mix.
|
|
Miscellaneous Planning Correction
As noted in the preliminary site plan comments, a consolidated internal parking lot landscaping area will be required per PMC 20.58.005 (1). Please ensure that in the resubmittal of both the preliminary site plan and the civil permit application that the consolidated landscape area meets the required distance from utilities per the VMS street tree installation standards table in VMS Chapter 12.4. [LS Set, L1]
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
Landscaping islands apply to all striped parking and storage areas, including heavy truck trailer parking. For large, paved areas which trigger parking lot landscaping under PMC 20.58.005, but may not contain vehicle striping for vehicle parking, staff will use reasonable discretion and flexibility in site designing to allow larger consolidated/ grouped islands to spread out evenly through the paved areas, ensuring landscaping meets the intent of the type IV design standards and meets the minimum landscape requirements in PMC 20.58.005.
Though parking lot landscape islands are not proposed due to the truck parking area not being striped, there is a requirement that all paved areas over 10,000SF shall have at least 5% of all paved surfaces to be landscaped. Perimeter landscaping shall not be calculated as part of the require amount of internal parking lot landscaping. You can propose a Type IV consolidated parking lot landscape area(s) to meet this 5% landscaped area requirement.
- Please include the calculation showing that 5% of all paved surfaces are landscaped (this cannot include perimeter landscaping).
Per PMC 20.58.005 (1) All paved areas of over 10,000 square feet shall have at least five percent of all paved areas landscaped to provide shade to reduce the heat island effect related to paved surfaces, reduce storm water runoff, improve air quality, provide visual breaks to large paved areas and improve general appearance. Perimeter landscaping shall not be calculated as part of the required amount of internal parking lot landscaping. Internal parking lot landscaping design and spacing shall conform to the “Type IV” landscaping standards contained in the city’s vegetation management standards (VMS) manual. In order to further mitigate the impacts of more substantial expanses of paved areas on development sites, the following shall apply: (a) In the event that a project provides 20 percent more than the required minimum number of parking stalls (per PMC 20.55.010) for a specific use or group of uses on a development complex site, or in the event that the total sum of paved areas on a site exceeds 100,000 square feet, at least 10 percent of all paved areas shall be landscaped in accordance with this section and the vegetation management standards (VMS) manual.
[landscape plan, L1]
|
|
See Document Markup
Please include the proposed parking stalls on the civil plan application [LS Set, L1]
|
|
See Document Markup
No tree plantings are allowed within 5 from hydrants [LS Set, L1]
|
|
See Document Markup
The existing 6' chain-link fences will need to be replaced or upgraded to be sight-obscuring fencing per PMC 20.35.035 (3). Fences may not exceed 8' in height. [LS Set, L1]
|
|
See Document Markup
Per PMC 20.35.035, sight-obscuring fencing is required around all portions of a lot utilized for outdoor storage. A fence is required along the southern property line (along Inter Ave.) to screen the outdoor storage. The maximum fence size is 8'. Any fence greater than 6' in height will require a building permit. The fence will be required to meet the 20' front yard setback. See PMC 20.35.035 (3) for full performance standards. [LS Set, L1]
|
|
See Document Markup
12', Type II perimeter landscaping is required along the front property line along Inter Ave. In addition to this 12' perimeter landscaping requirement, we are requiring street trees be planted back of walk to address the requirement for street trees for frontage improvements. The plans appear to propose this, but please clarify that there is 12' for perimeter landscaping and additional area that is used for back of walk street tree planting. [LS Set, L1]
|
|
See Document Markup
Landscaping along the front property line is required to be Type IIb landscaping. Type III landscaping is only used for interior side yards. Please see Chapter 14.2 of the VMS for more information regarding the landscape requirements for Type IIb landscaping and make changes to the plans accordingly. [LS Set, L1]
|
|
See Document Markup
This proposed tree is too close to the SD line. [LS Set, L1]
|
|
|
Engineering Civil Review
|
Failed
|
05/02/2023
|
05/03/2023
|
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Include the engineering approval block on the plan sheets. [civils, pg 1]
|
|
See Document Markup
See all prelminary site plan comments and update the civil plans accordingly. [civils, pg 1]
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide proposed cut and fill amounts. [civils, pg 1]
|
|
See Document Markup
Revise note 1 to reference CS 01.02.0a on sheet C13. [civils, pg 3]
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide a legend for the plan set. Be sure to include existing and proposed linetypes and hatches. [civils, pg 3]
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide a plan for temporary stormwater mitigation to detain stormwater flows equal to the 100 year/24 hour storm event. [civils, pg 3]
|
|
See Document Markup
Include the name of the abutting street. [civils, pg 5]
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide invert elevations for the sewer connection to the main, cleanouts and connection to the proposed building. [civils, pg 5]
|
|
See Document Markup
Include the existing and proposed contours on grading sheet. [civils, pg 5]
|
|
See Document Markup
Place a structure at the bend of this storm pipe. [civils, pg 5]
|
|
See Document Markup
Per city standard stormwater pipe shall be only PVC, concrete, Ductile Iron or dual walled polypropylene. Revise the proposed CPEP pipe. [civils, pg 5]
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide a detail for the proposed Contech water quality system. [civils, pg 14]
|
|
See Document Markup
Revise the white hatch to grey to show match the rest of the proposed asphalt. [civils, pg 6]
|
|
See Document Markup
Clearly show the edges of the property boundary lines. [civils, pg 6]
|
|
See Document Markup
Show the extents of the right of way. Include the Inter Ave roadway name. [civils, pg 6]
|
|
See Document Markup
create a zoomed in section view of both proposed ADA ramps. Include spot elevations at all corners of the landing and ramp. Ensure a 2% cross slope and maximum 8.33% run slope. [civils, pg 6]
|
|
See Document Markup
Continue the sidewalk straight along Inter Ave. Remove this transition. [civils, pg 6]
|
|
See Document Markup
Create a note on this detail and frontage plans that states the trees will be installed at the back of the sidewalk. [civils, pg 9]
|
|
See Document Markup
It does not appear that the porous pavement overflow detail is proposed or applicable to this project. Revise accordingly. [civils, pg 9]
|
|
See Document Markup
Show the half street improvement transition past the road centerline per CS 01.01.19 on the plan view. [civils, pg 6]
|
|
See Document Markup
Continue the sidewalk straight along this section.[civils, pg 6]
|
|
See Document Markup
Relocate the arrow to existing water meter for construction note 16. [civils, pg 6]
|
|
See Document Markup
The city is requiring these street trees to be at the back of the proposed sidewalk. See planning's comments. [civils, pg 6]
|
|
See Document Markup
Reference that these are City of Puyallup roadway plan notes. [civils, pg 9]
|
|
See Document Markup
Detail 11 and 13 on this sheet are illegible. [civils, pg 10]
|
|
See Document Markup
A portion of the water system notes are illegible. [civils, pg 11]
|
|
See Document Markup
Show the commercial side sewer connection with sampling connection per city standard 04.03.04 [civils, pg 5]
|
|
See Document Markup
The dimensions of this stormtech detail 2 are illegible. [civils, pg 13]
|
|
See Document Markup
Dimension the propoosed stormtech detention system. [civils, pg 5]
|
|
See Document Markup
Show catch basins within the right of way which will require inlet protection. [civils, pg 3]
|
|
See Document Markup
Groundwater was determined to be 2.5' below the existing ground surface during the wet season. The proposed detention vault excavation will require dewatering. Show the location of proposed baker tanks for dewatering. [civils, pg 3]
|
|
See Document Markup
Show the temporary excavation proposed for the stormtech chambers. [civils. pg 3]
|
|
See Document Markup
Show the connection from the roof downspouts to the stormtech chamber. This area is considered non pollution generating and may bypass the water quality filter. [civils, pg 5]
|
|
See Document Markup
Proposed? [civils, pg 6]
|
|
See Document Markup
Show minimum gutter slope flow to be 0.5% for the proposed curb. [civils, pg 6]
|
|
See Document Markup
Revise overlapped text within the profile view. [civils, pg 6]
|
|
See Document Markup
It appears a gutter drain catch basin is warranted on the west side of the frontage to collect stormwater gutter runoff. [civils, pg 6]
|
|
See Document Markup
Will this be 9" or greater? [civils, pg 14]
|
|
See Document Markup
Define the required sump depth. [civils. pg 14]
|
|
See Document Markup
Will the flow control structure be installed within the stormtech chamber area or a downstream structure? Provide clarity and a detail for the proposed notch and orifice elevation and size. If located downstream, utilize city standard 02.01.07. [civils, pg 14]
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide a parts breakdown list for the number of chambers and endcaps required for installation of the stormtech system. [civils, pg 14]
|
|
See Document Markup
Revise the reference for soil amendment from the 2021 Pierce County Stormwater manual to either CS 01.02.08a or the 2019 DOE manual for Western Washington. [D Report]
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide a basin map visually showing these values in Table 1. [D Report, pg 7]
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide 2019 DOE flow charts for MR 5, MR 6 and MR 8 as described in the preliminary site plan PLLPSP20220172 review. [D Report, pg 14]
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide a basin map providing proposed pervious and impervious areas. [D Report, pg 23]
|
|
See Document Markup
Table 1 of this report states the the proposed landscape is 20,150SF which is 0.46acres. Revise this area. [D Report, pg 26]
|
|
See Document Markup
Table 1 of this report state the asphalt parking is 55,450SF which is 1.27 acres. What is the additional area representing? [D report, pg 26]
|
|
See Document Markup
It does not appear that the minimum requirement for the flow control standard has been met via this continuous modeling. [D Report, pg 37]
|
|
See Document Markup
Size the contech water quality device per minimum requirement 6 the 2019 DOE manual. [D report, pg 39]
|
|
See Document Markup
Revise the O&M manual information to refer to the 2019 DOE manual. [D Report, pg 66]
|
|
See Document Markup
Include a comment response letter addressing the city's markups in the resubmittal. [civils, pg 1]
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide a downstream analysis showing the conveyance system has capacity for the 25-year, 24 hours storm event. [D Report, pg 10]
|
|
See Document Markup
There is no MR 10 within the 2019 DOE manual. Remove this section. [D Report, pg 11]
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide a downstream analysis showing the conveyance system has capacity for the 25-year, 24 hours storm event. [D Report, pg 13]
|
|
See Document Markup
Date the stamp during the next submission. [civils, pg 1
|
|
See Document Markup
Show proposed parking striping on this sheet. [civils, pg 2]
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide an energy dissipater BMP to inhibit erosion of the swale for the water discharged to this swale. [civils, pg 5]
|
|
See Document Markup
Show the existing catch basin that is located just off-site that will collect the stormwater runoff discharged to this swale. The CB was installed per civil permit E-20-0137. [civils, pg 5]
|
|
See Document Markup
Show proposed improvements within the right of way on this sheet. [civils, pg 2]
|
|
|
Engineering Traffic Review
|
Failed
|
05/02/2023
|
05/03/2023
|
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
Show preliminary locations of City standard streetlights. Streetlights must be placed outside ADA wheelchair ramp area. City preference is to have street light base completely outside the ramp and sidewalk.
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
Show frontage design with 8ft sidewalks with street trees behind sidewalk.
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
Based on existing pavement conditions of Inter Ave, half-street paving will be required.
|
|
|
Fire Review
|
Approved
|
05/02/2023
|
05/02/2023
|
|
|
|
|
Public Works Water Review
|
Failed
|
05/02/2023
|
03/29/2023
|
|
|
|
See Document Markup
CIVIL PLANS Sheet C5: Change sheet title to Grading, Drainage, Sewer, and Water Plan
|
|
See Document Markup
CIVIL PLANS Sheet C5: Fire hydrant needs its own 6-inch gate valve and hydrant run off the 8-inch water main run. Relocate the 8-inch water main to the east enough to support a 2-foot hydrant run, a 6-inch gate valve, and an 8-inch MJ x 6-inch Fl tee with an 8-inch MJ plug to the north.
|
|
See Document Markup
CIVIL PLANS Sheet C5: The domestic water service meter size is not called out. To eliminate an additional service crossing on Inter Ave, tap the proposed 8-inch water main and set the water service meter at the back of sidewalk, as far to the west as possible to avoid large truck off-tracking. Install the above ground RPBA - not DCVA 3-feet north of meter. RPBA size should match water meter size. Run appropriate size poly pipe from back of RPBA to building.
|
|
See Document Markup
CIVIL PLANS Sheet C5: Please note that the maximum fire flow from a dead-end 8-inch water main run is 1,560 GPM. If greater flow is needed, the water main size will need to be up-sized or an 8-inch loop line will need to be created.
|
|
See Document Markup
CIVIL PLANS Sheet C6: The domestic water service meter size is not called out. To eliminate an additional service crossing on Inter Ave, tap the proposed 8-inch water main and set the water service meter at the back of sidewalk, as far to the west as possible to avoid large truck off-tracking. Install the above ground RPBA - not DCVA 3-feet north of meter. RPBA size should match water meter size.
|
|
See Document Markup
CIVIL PLANS Sheet C6: The 8-inch wet tap will need to be shifted to the east to make room for a fire hydrant run - see comment on Sheet C5. If this does not allow room for the water meter to be set at back of sidewalk, 8-inch 45-degree bends will need to be installed north of the water service tap.
|
|
See Document Markup
CIVIL PLANS Sheet C6: Show the existing water service to be abandoned.
|
|
See Document Markup
CIVIL PLANS Sheet C6: Is an irrigation service needed for this site? If so, call out the size and location of the meter. Protect with the same size DCVA. If irrigation will come off the domestic water service, install the irrigation tee between the meter and RPBA and protect the irrigation line with a DCVA.
|
|
See Document Markup
CIVIL PLANS Sheet C11: Select the water meter size and remove the standard detail not needed.
|
|
See Document Markup
CIVIL PLANS Sheet C11: If irrigation will be added to this plan set, keep this detail. Add or replace with City Standard detail 03.04.02 2-inch or smaller RPBA installation for the domestic service.
|
|
See Document Markup
1969LSE LS SET Sheet L1: No trees within 10-feet of any water main.
|
|
|
Public Works Collection Review
|
Failed
|
05/02/2023
|
03/27/2023
|
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Existing catch basin, in current gravel driveway is not reflected on plans. This structure will need to be removed and replaced to the curb line. Place between gutter crossing and ADA ramping to keep new pipe crossing as perpendicular as possible [Civil Plans; C6]
|
|
See Document Markup
Existing 8 inch storm pipe will need to be replaced with 12 inch, from new catch basin to the existing. [Civil Plans; C6]
|
|
See Document Markup
The existing concrete sanitary lateral tap for the house on site is located 3.5 feet east of the manhole. This lateral should be renewed to current standards and not replaced with a new tap. Reference water division comments about relocation of proposed residential connection. [Civil Plans; C6]
|
|
See Document Markup
All existing sanitary main along this project is 8 inch concrete. [Civil Plans; C6]
|
|
See Document Markup
Prefer standard 01.02.19 pg 6
|
|
|