Review Type |
Outcome |
Est. Completion Date |
Completed |
Engineering Review
|
Failed
|
04/28/2025
|
04/25/2025
|
|
|
|
See Document Markup
The retaining wall building permit site plan must match the approved civil site plan. Since there was a significant change to the building footprint that impacts storm drainage, utility crossings, and other civil components, a formal Plan Change Request (PCR) is required for civil construction permit PRCCP20231028. Please email the new civil plans and PCR form to the City's development engineer assigned to the civil permit.
The Engineering review on the retaining wall building permit cannot be approved until the civil permit PCR is approved first since the two permits must match. It is the applicant's responsibility to coordinate the next building permit submission with the approval of the PCR to avoid redundant reviews and permit fees. [SITE PLAN, sheet A0.1]
|
|
See Document Markup
The proposed project includes several retaining walls. Include the building permit number for each retaining wall in the individual callouts. [SITE PLAN, sheet A0.1]
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide a drainage plan for the proposed retaining wall. Indicate how the retaining wall footing drain will connect to the site's storm system. [SITE PLAN, sheet A0.1]
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide a section detail of the retaining wall depicting the 8" SD pipe crossing from CO#71 to CB#3. [SITE PLAN, sheet A0.1]
|
|
See Document Markup
In accordance with City site plan standards, include a utility overlay on the architectural site plan. [SITE PLAN, sheet A0.1]
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide a drainage plan for the proposed retaining wall that depicts the footing drain at the back of the wall. The referenced footing drain is not depicted in the AHBL structural plans, Barghausen civil plans, or in any details. More information is needed on the footing drain design and its connection to the onsite stormwater system. [SITE PLAN, sheet A0.1]
|
|
See Document Markup
To satisfy the utility overlay requirement from the first review corrections, please submit the approved PCR civil plans with the next retaining wall resubmission. [SITE PLAN, sheet A0.1]
|
Fire Review
|
Approved
|
04/28/2025
|
04/23/2025
|
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
The retaining wall does not show the required path that was approved during the Civils. This is a fire fighter path that was a continuation of the existing path that is required to extend around the new addition. Resubmit with the required path for review.
|
Planning Review
|
Failed
|
04/28/2025
|
04/15/2025
|
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Planning Correction
What is the exposed face height of the retaining wall? The structural plans are not clear, they only appear to show top of wall elevations.
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
Will the retaining wall construction require disturbance and replanting of the averaged wetland buffer at the time this wall is constructed? The construction plan sheets need to show area of disturbance to the site and the limits of the area of work since the construction will occur adjacent to a wetland buffer area.
|
Building Review
|
Approved
|
04/28/2025
|
04/15/2025
|
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Footings will be on the northern portion lot. Per the geo report this portion of the lot has significant organic fill that overlays the native soil. Review soils report and revise details as necessary. Geo engineer provides a path of either pipe piles or ground improvements. Detail the path that will be used on the plans.
|
Engineering Civil Review
|
Failed
|
01/27/2025
|
01/30/2025
|
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
Resubmittal required per other reviewer's comments.
|
Engineering Review
|
Failed
|
01/27/2025
|
01/23/2025
|
|
|
|
See Document Markup
The retaining wall building permit site plan must match the approved civil site plan. Since there was a significant change to the building footprint that impacts storm drainage, utility crossings, and other civil components, a formal Plan Change Request (PCR) is required for civil construction permit PRCCP20231028. Please email the new civil plans and PCR form to the City's development engineer assigned to the civil permit.
The Engineering review on the retaining wall building permit cannot be approved until the civil permit PCR is approved first since the two permits must match. It is the applicant's responsibility to coordinate the next building permit submission with the approval of the PCR to avoid redundant reviews and permit fees. [SITE PLAN, sheet A0.1]
|
|
See Document Markup
The proposed project includes several retaining walls. Include the building permit number for each retaining wall in the individual callouts. [SITE PLAN, sheet A0.1]
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide a drainage plan for the proposed retaining wall. Indicate how the retaining wall footing drain will connect to the site's storm system. [SITE PLAN, sheet A0.1]
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide a section detail of the retaining wall depicting the 8" SD pipe crossing from CO#71 to CB#3. [SITE PLAN, sheet A0.1]
|
|
See Document Markup
In accordance with City site plan standards, include a utility overlay on the architectural site plan. [SITE PLAN, sheet A0.1]
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
|
Building Review
|
Failed
|
01/27/2025
|
01/16/2025
|
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Footings will be on the northern portion lot. Per the geo report this portion of the lot has significant organic fill that overlays the native soil. Review soils report and revise details as necessary. Geo engineer provides a path of either pipe piles or ground improvements. Detail the path that will be used on the plans.
|
Fire Review
|
Failed
|
01/27/2025
|
01/15/2025
|
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
The retaining wall does not show the required path that was approved during the Civils. This is a fire fighter path that was a continuation of the existing path that is required to extend around the new addition. Resubmit with the required path for review.
|
Planning Review
|
Failed
|
01/27/2025
|
01/09/2025
|
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Planning Correction
What is the exposed face height of the retaining wall? The structural plans are not clear, they only appear to show top of wall elevations.
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
Will the retaining wall construction require disturbance and replanting of the averaged wetland buffer at the time this wall is constructed? The construction plan sheets need to show area of disturbance to the site and the limits of the area of work since the construction will occur adjacent to a wetland buffer area.
UPDATED COMMENT 04/15/25: There is a reference to an updated wetland report that was not included with the submittal. We need to review a revised wetland mitigation plan to permit the additional averaging impacts. See 21.06.930 (4) for criteria.
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
Is the new fire walk way path eliminating all the perimeter landscaping up to the property line south of the proposed wall? The walkway appears to be tapering the required 6' landscaping down to zero at certain places. Landscaping cannot be fully eliminated without a variance. Can the walkway 'hug' along the building wall to avoid displacement of landscape?
|
Engineering Civil Review
|
Pending
|
04/28/2025
|
|
|
|