Review Type |
Outcome |
Est. Completion Date |
Completed |
Engineering Traffic Review
|
Revisions Required
|
01/23/2023
|
02/07/2023
|
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
Traffic scoping worksheet will be required. The City policy requires the project trips to be estimated using the Institute of Transportation Engineers’ (ITE) Trip Generation, 11th Edition. In general, trip generation regression equations shall be used when the R2 value is 0.70 or greater. For single-family units and offices smaller than 30,000 SF, use ITE’s Trip Generation, average rate. The project trips shall be rounded to the nearest tenth.
The City has adopted a City-Wide Traffic Impact Fee of $4,500 per PM peak hour trip and shall be paid prior to building permit issuance.
Once the traffic scoping worksheet is reviewed, a written response would be sent to the applicant’s traffic engineer outlining the scope of the project’s Traffic Impact Study (TIS).
Park impact fee was established by Ordinance 3142 dated July 3, 2017 and shall be charged per new dwelling unit based on its size:
Park Impact Fee (Per residential dwelling Unit):
Less than 500 sqft $1,560.05
500 - 999 sqft $2,313.53
1,000 – 1,999 sqft $3,291.31
2,000 sqft or more $4,017.30
Per Puyallup Municipal Code Section 11.08.135, the applicant/owner would be expected to construct half-street improvements including curb, gutter, planter strip, sidewalk, roadway base, pavement, and street lighting. Any existing improvements which are damaged now or during construction, or which do not meet current City Standards, shall be replaced.
3rd St SE is classified as Major Arterial.
• City standards (Section 101.10.1) require minimum spacing of 300 feet from the intersection & driveways measured between closest edges of the driveway. (see below)
• Due to the existing curvature of 3rd St SE, direct access will not be allowed.
• Frontage improvements shall consist of curb, gutter, 8ft sidewalks, 10ft planter strip, and streetlights.
The City Puyallup does not have engineering design standards for a Festival Street. City staff would work closely with the applicant to determine the design requirements for this roadway section.
Half-street improvements would be required on E Main & 2nd St SE frontages.
Direct ingress/egress will not be allowed from “Hill Lot” to E Pioneer (Arterial) due to driveway spacing standards.
A sight distance analysis will be necessary during preliminary site plan review.
Additional ROW dedication may be necessary.
At the time of civil permit review provide a separate street lighting sheet for the city to review.
On-site monument signage must be located outside sight distance triangle.
If a gate is proposed along frontage, it must be positioned to allow space for vehicles to queue without blocking sidewalk
|
|
|
Planning Review
|
Revisions Required
|
01/23/2023
|
01/25/2023
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Review
|
Revisions Required
|
01/23/2023
|
01/23/2023
|
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
GENERAL:
• The comments provided below are intended to assist the project proponent with incorporating City requirements into the project documents, but should not be considered an exhaustive list of all necessary provisions from the PMC, design standards, or the Ecology stormwater manual.
• The proposed development site is currently an active cleanup site for contaminated soils. The City has been working diligently with the Dept. of Ecology (Ecology) to ensure the site is remediated. Groundwater monitoring is ongoing and the City is optimistic that the cleanup efforts (excavation and bioremediation) taken to date are working in accordance with the approved cleanup plan. The City has approached the Dept. of Ecology requesting the site be evaluated for a “No Further Action Determination”, but the City has not received a response as of this writing. Once Ecology responds, it will take four consecutive quarters of clean test results before the final NFA can be issued. The project proponent should be aware that there may be design and construction constraints imposed by Ecology as part of any development.
• The City is in the early stages of determining the Festival Street design criteria. An SOQ will be released in early 2023 to select a consultant to assist the City and it is anticipated the final design criteria will be completed in early 2024.
• Engineered plans must follow the latest regulations and standards set forth in the Puyallup Municipal Code (PMC), the City Standards for Public Works Engineering and Construction (design standards), and the current City adopted stormwater manual at the time of civil permit application [PMC 21.10.040].
• Comments regarding design and construction of new utilities and road improvements are provided for the developer’s information and use. Unless specifically noted, construction of these infrastructure improvements is not a condition of landuse approval. However, infrastructure improvements must be approved and permitted prior to issuance of the first building permit associated with the project. [RCW 58.17.120 and 19.07.080]
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
WATER:
• Refer to City Standards, Section 300 for Water System Requirements. [PMC 14.02.120]
• There is an existing 8-inch ductile iron watermain located in 2nd St SE and an undersized 6-inch cast iron watermain within E Main, W Meeker and 3rd St SE. It is the City’s expectation that the undersized watermain along the frontage of E Main and W Meeker be upgraded to current city standards.
• The domestic service line and fire system service line shall have separate, independent connections to the supply main. [PMC 14.02 & CS 302.3(4)]
• Public water mains shall be located generally 10 or 12-feet west or south of roadway centerlines per city standard drawings. Any portion of a public mainline extension located outside City right-of-way must be centered in a minimum 40-foot wide easement granted to the City for maintenance purposes. The easement shall be clearly indicated on the plat document. [PMC 14.02.120(f) & CS 301.1(11)]
• The project proponent shall be responsible for the operation and maintenance of the proposed water system located on private property.
• Any existing services that are to be abandoned at this site shall be disconnected at the main, the corp. stop removed, and the service plugged to city standards. [PMC 14.02.120(f)]
• The minimum distance between water lines and sewer lines shall be 10-feet horizontally and 18-inches vertically. If this criterion cannot be met, the sewer and water lines shall be isolated by encasement, shielding, or other approved methods. [PMC 14.02.120(f) & CS 301.1(8)]
• Water pipe and service connections shall be a minimum of 10-feet away from building foundations and/or roof lines.
• The project proponent shall be responsible to provide and install the water meters required to service the site. Domestic service water meters shall be located within the public ROW, or in the case of a private road adjacent to the road section, in accordance with City Standards. [PMC 14.02.120(f) & CS 301.3]
• Project proponent shall provide backflow protection on the domestic service line(s) with the installation of a double check valve assembly (DCVA) on the domestic connection. The unit should be located outside the building, immediately downstream of the existing water meter. If an irrigation system is also proposed, a DCVA is required on that line as well. [PMC 14.02.220(3) & CS 302.2]
• If any of the proposed building uses are included under WAC 246-290-490 Table 9 facilities, then backflow protection shall be provided using a reduced pressure backflow assembly (RPBA).
• Available fire flow for the project site must be determined by hydraulic modeling conducted by the City’s consultant. The cost of this analysis is $600 and shall be paid by the project proponent.
• Fire hydrants and other appurtenances such as DDCVA and PIV shall be placed as directed by the Puyallup Fire Code Official. Fire hydrants shall be placed so that there is a minimum of 50-feet of separation from hydrants to any building walls. [PMC 16.08.080 & CS 301.2, 302.3]
• Maximum hydrant run is 20-feet. Hydrant runs that exceed this distance shall be served by a mainline with the hydrant feed line set at right angles to the supply main.
• The fire sprinkler double detector check valve assembly (DDCVA) may be located either inside, or outside, of the building. The sprinkler supply line shall be designed, and shown on the plan, into the building to the point of connection to the interior building riser. Provide plan and elevation detail(s) where the riser enters the building with dimensions, clearances, and joint restraint in accordance with NFPA 24. [CS 302.3, CS 303]
• The Fire Department Connection (FDC) shall be located no closer than 10-feet and no further than 15-feet from a fire hydrant. (NOTE: If the project is utilizing a fire booster pump, the FDC must connect to the sprinkler system on the discharge side of the pump in accordance with NFPA regulations.) A post indicator valve (PIV) shall be provided for the fire sprinkler system in advance of the DDCVA. [CS 302.3]
• Utility extensions, if any, shall be approved and permitted prior to any building permit issuance. [PMC 14.02.130]
• For new watermain installations, the engineer-of-record shall complete the State Department of Health’s “Construction Completion Report for Distribution Main Projects”, seal, and provide a copy to the City prior to completion of the project. [WAC 246-290-120]
• For each residential building, a water system development charge (SDC) will be assessed based on the number of “residential” units in the facility. Current SDC’s as of this writing are $4,260.00 for the first residential unit and $3,195.00 for each additional unit per building. [PMC 14.02.040, 14.10.030]
• For any commercial building, including common/administrative facilities associated with a residential use (office, clubhouse, hallways, pool areas, etc.), a water system development charge (SDC) will be assessed based on the number of plumbing fixture units as defined in the Uniform Plumbing Code. Current SDC’s as of this writing are $4,260.00 for the first 15 fixture units and an additional charge of $285.42 for each fixture unit in excess of the base 15 plumbing fixture units. [PMC 14.02.040]
• Water connection fees and systems development charges are due at the time of building permit issuance and do not vest until time of permit issuance. [PMC 14.02.040, 14.10.030]
• To obtain credit towards System Development Fees for any existing fixture units, the project proponent shall provide the City evidence of the existing plumbing fixtures prior to demolition or removal. A written breakdown of the removed fixture types, quantities, and associated fixture units shall accompany the building permit application and be subject to review and approval by the City. [PMC 14.02.040]
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
SANITARY SEWER:
• Refer to City Standards, Section 400 for Sewer System Requirements. [PMC 17.42]
• There is an existing 8-inch dead-end sewer main located in E Main approximately 120-ft east of 2nd St SE and roughly 4-ft deep. In addition, there is an existing 8-inch dead-end sewer on E Meeker approximately 50-ft east of 2nd St SE and approximately 4-ft deep. At the time of application, the project proponent shall replace the dead-end cleanouts with manholes at both locations.
• As of this writing, there are no known sewer constrictions in this system within ¼-mile of the proposed project.
• Sanitary sewer mains shall be 8-inch minimum and located 5-feet east or north of roadway centerlines. In accordance with PMC 14.20.020, sewer main extensions shall be carried across the full width of the property being served except in those cases where, in the opinion of the city engineer, the utility involved can never, under any circumstances, be extended beyond the property being served. [PMC 14.20 and PMC 17.42]
• A separate and independent side sewer will be required from the public main to the project site. Side sewers shall be 6-inch minimum diameter with a 0.02 foot per foot slope. Side sewers shall have a cleanout at the property line, at the building, and every 100 feet between the two points. [PMC 14.08.110 & CS 401(6)]
• If the proposed side sewer is greater than 6-inches, a sanitary sewer manhole shall be provided at the property line.
• Any existing side sewer shall not be re-used for the new facility. A new line shall be run from the existing tee to the building(s) being served. The existing trench shall be used and the old sanitary sewer stub shall be removed. [PMC 14.08.120 & CS 401(16)]
• Sewer main pipe and service connections shall be a minimum of 10-feet away from building foundations and/or roof lines.
• Grease Interceptors are required for all commercial facilities involved in food preparation. If there is potential for a future tenant to process food as part of the commercial alternative, an external grease interceptor shall be provided in accordance with the current edition of the Uniform Plumbing Code adopted by the City of Puyallup, Puyallup Municipal Code, and City standard details. [PMC 14.06.031(3) & CS 401(5), 402.3]
• The construction of a trash enclosure will require the enclosure pad to be elevated to prevent stormwater run-on and the entire enclosure covered to prevent stormwater inflow into the sewer area drain. [CS 208.1]
• Utility extensions shall be approved and permitted prior to any building permit issuance. [PMC 14.02.130]
• For each building, a sanitary sewer system development charge (SDC) will be assessed based on the number of “residential” units in the facility. Current SDC’s as of this writing are $5,890.00 for the first residential unit and $4,417.5.00 for each additional unit. [PMC 14.10.010, 14.10.030]
• For any commercial building, including common/administrative facilities associated with a residential use (office, clubhouse, hallways, pool areas, etc.), a sewer system development charge (SDC) will be assessed based on the number of plumbing fixture units as defined in the Uniform Plumbing Code. Current SDC’s as of this writing are $5,890.00 for the first 15 plumbing fixture units and an additional charge of $394.63 for each fixture unit in excess of the base 15 plumbing fixture units. [PMC 14.02.040]
• Sewer connection fees and systems development charges are due at the time of building permit issuance and do not vest until time of permit issuance. [PMC 14.10.010, 14.10.030]
• To obtain credit towards System Development Fees for any existing fixture units, the project proponent shall provide the City evidence of the existing plumbing fixtures prior to demolition or removal. A written breakdown of the removed fixture types, quantities, and associated fixture units shall accompany the building permit application and be subject to review and approval by the City. [PMC 14.10.010]
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
STORMWATER/ EROSION CONTROL:
• The comments below associated with stormwater are based on the assumption that the project will be retaining stormwater onsite. However, there is the possibility of the project being allowed to direct discharge stormwater to the Puyallup River depending on timing of the proposed development. The City currently has plans to extend a direct discharge trunkline to the stormwater basin that serves the project site, but it is not anticipated that the trunkline will be completed until late 2026.
If the applicant proposes a direct discharge connection to the Puyallup River, the associated conveyance system shall be designed in accordance with the requirements of PMC 21.10.04 and the Ecology Manual, Volume I, Section 3.4.7 and City Standards Section 204.2. Specifically:
- The project site must be drained by a conveyance system that is comprised entirely of manmade elements and extends to the ordinary high water mark of the Puyallup River;
- The conveyance system between the project site and the Puyallup River shall have adequate conveyance capacity to convey discharges from the proposed (post-development) project, in addition to the discharges associated with the existing basin tributary to the outfall;
- All such flows shall remain within all catch basin or manhole rims for a continuous model simulation associated with the September 17, 1969, storm event assuming no backflow influence from the Puyallup River and shall provide greater than one cfs remaining capacity of the system.
- The discharge will not cause, or aggravate, downstream flooding problems
- The discharge does not reduce natural flows to other streams or wetlands
• Stormwater design shall be in accordance with PMC Chapter 21.10 and the Department of Ecology (Ecology) Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington (aka “Ecology Manual”) as adopted by the City Council at the time of project application.
• Stormwater design shall be in accordance with the 2019 Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington (The 2019 SWMMWW aka “Ecology Manual”).
• Refer to City Standards, Section 200 for Stormwater System Requirements. [PMC 17.42]
• The project proponent shall complete the stormwater flowchart, Figure 1-3.1 and Figure 1-3.2, contained in the Ecology Manual. The completed flowchart shall be submitted with the preliminary stormwater site plan and highlight the Minimum Requirements (MR) triggered by the project thresholds.
• NOTE: Areas of disturbance within the public ROW must be included in the project area as part of the stormwater thresholds and calculations.
• The project proponent is responsible for submitting a preliminary stormwater management site plan which meets the design requirements provided by PMC Section 21.10 and Ecology Manual. The preliminary stormwater site plan (PSSP) shall be submitted with the landuse application to ensure that adequate stormwater facilities are anticipated prior to development of the property. The preliminary stormwater site plan shall reasonably estimate the quantity of stormwater runoff and the application of On-site Stormwater Management BMPs for the proposed development.
• The written technical report shall clearly delineate any offsite basins tributary to the project site and include the following information: [PMC 21.10.060]
- the quantity of the offsite runoff;
- the location(s) where the offsite runoff enters the project site;
- how the offsite runoff will be routed through the project site.
- the location of proposed retention/detention facilities
- and, the location of proposed treatment facilities
• Each section of the TIR/SSP shall be individually indexed and tabbed with each permit application and every re-submittal prior to review by the City. [PMC 21.10.060]
• Public right-of-way runoff shall be detained and treated independently from proposed private stormwater facilities. This shall be accomplished by enlarging the private facilities to account for bypass runoff; providing separate publicly maintained storm facilities within a tract or dedicated right-of-way; or, other methods as approved by the City Engineer. [PMC 21.10.190(3)]
• Development and redevelopment projects are required to employ, wherever feasible, Low Impact Development (LID) Best Management Practices (BMPs) to meet the design criteria set forth in PMC 21.10.190, the Ecology Manual Volume I, Minimum Requirement 5; Volume III, Chapter 3; and Volume V, Chapter 5.
• If infiltration facilities/BMPs are anticipated, the number of infiltration tests shall be based on the area contributing to the proposed facility/BMP, e.g., one test for every 5,000 sq. ft of permeable pavement, or one test for each bioretention cell.
• Preliminary feasibility/infeasibility testing for infiltration facilities/BMPs shall be in accordance with the site analysis requirements of the Ecology Manual, Volume I, Chapter 3, specifically:
- Groundwater evaluation, either instantaneous (MR1-5), or continuous monitoring (MR1-9), during the wet weather months (December 21 through April 1).
- Hydraulic conductivity testing:
i. If the development meets the threshold to require implementation of Minimum Requirement #7 (flow control); or, if the site soils are consolidated; or, if the property is encumbered by a critical area, then Small Scale Pilot Infiltration Testing (PIT) during the wet weather months (December 21 through April 1) is required.
ii. If the development does not meet the threshold to require implementation of Minimum Requirement #7; or, is not encumbered by a critical area; and is located on soils unconsolidated by glacial advance, grain size analyses may be substituted for the Small Scale PIT test at the discretion of the review engineer.
- Testing to determine the hydraulic restriction layer.
- Mounding analysis may be required in accordance with Ecology Volume III Section 3.3.8.
• Upon submission of the geotechnical infiltration testing, appropriate long-term correction factors shall be noted for any areas utilizing infiltration into the underlying native soils in accordance with the Ecology Manual, Volume III, Chapter 3. Provide the long-term infiltration rate calculation in the stormwater report.
• At the time of civil permit application, the project proponent is responsible for submitting a permanent storm water management plan which meets the design requirements provided by PMC Section 21.10. [PMC 21.10.190, 21.10.060]
- When using WWHM for analysis, provide the following WWHM project files with the civil permit application:
- Binary project file (WHM file extension)
- ASCII project file (WH2 file extension)
- WDM file (WDM file extension)
- WWHM report text (Word file)
• For offsite basin inflow: At time of civil application, document compliance with 2019 Ecology Manual, Vol III, Sec III-2.4 (2014 Manual, Vol. III, Appendix III-B, Section 6) for the Offsite Basin inflow.
• Any above-ground stormwater facility shall be screened from public right-of-way and adjacent property per the underlying zoning perimeter buffer requirements in the PMC.
• Stormwater R/D facilities shall be a minimum of 20-feet from any public right-of-way, tract, vegetative buffer, and/or property line measured from the toe of the exterior slope/embankment of the facility. [PMC 21.10 & DOE Manual, Vol. V, Pg 10-39 and Pg 10-9]
• If the proposed project discharges to an adjacent wetland, the project proponent shall provide a hydrologic analysis which ensures the wetland’s hydrologic conditions, hydrophytic vegetation, and substrate characteristics are maintained. See Ecology Manual Volume I, Minimum Requirement 8.
- Clarify how the wetland hydrology is being maintained. Provide hydroperiod analysis for each wetland in accordance with the DOE Manual, MR8 and Appendix I-D.
• Roof drainage drywells, if used, shall be designed in accordance with City Standards and the DOE Manual.
• Water quality treatment of stormwater shall be in accordance with the Ecology Manual, Volume 1, Minimum Requirement 6; and Volume 5, Runoff Treatment.
• If the project proponent proposes to use bioretention cells for water quality treatment, the following notes shall be added to the civil design plans:
- “At the completion of the bioretention cells construction, the engineer-of-record shall provide a written statement to the City of Puyallup that the bioretention cells were built per the approved design.”
- “The bioretention soil media (BSM) supplier shall certify in writing that the bioretention soil media meets the guidelines for Ecology-approved BSM including mineral aggregate gradation, compost guidelines, and mix standards as specified in the 2012 Low Impact Development Technical Guidance Manual for Puget Sound. And, if so verified, no laboratory infiltration testing, cation exchange, or organic content testing is required.”
• Overflow facilities shall be provided at the low points of the proposed permeable pavement areas to allow safe discharge to the downstream public storm system.
• Trench dams shall be provided at the property line for utilities located below infiltrative facilities including, but not limited to, permeable pavements and bioretention facilities. Reference City Standard Detail 06.01.10.
• Construction of frontage improvements associated with this project will require installation/extension of the stormwater main to accommodate road runoff. The new stormwater main shall be adequately sized to accommodate any upstream basins tributary to main.
• At the time of civil permit application, all pipe reaches shall be summarized in a Conveyance Table containing the following minimum information and included in the TIR:
Pipe Reach Name Design Flow (cfs)
Structure Tributary Area Pipe-Full Flow (cfs)
Pipe Diameter (in) Water Depth at Design Flow (in)
Pipe Length (ft) Critical Depth (in)
Pipe Slope (%) Velocity at Design Flow (fps)
Manning’s Coefficient (n) Velocity at Pipe-Full Flow (fps)
Percent full at Design Flow (%)
HGL for each Pipe Reach (elev)
• At the time of civil permit application, the project proponent shall provide a conveyance capacity analysis of the existing downstream storm conveyance system to ensure adequate capacity assuming existing conditions for any contributing offsite areas, and developed conditions for the project site.
• All storm drains shall be signed as follows:
a) Publicly maintained stormwater catch basins shall be signed using glue-down markers supplied by the City and installed by the project proponent.
b) Privately maintained stormwater catch basins shall be signed with pre-cut 90ml torch down heavy-duty, intersection-grade preformed thermoplastic pavement marking material. It shall read either “Only Rain Down the Drain" or “No Dumping, Drains to Stream”. Alternatively, the glue-down markers may be purchased from the City for a nominal fee.
• All private storm drainage facilities shall be covered by a maintenance agreement provided by the City and recorded with Pierce County. Under this agreement, if the owner fails to properly maintain the facilities, the City, after giving the owner notice, may perform necessary maintenance at the owner’s expense.
• Erosion control measures for this site will be critical. A comprehensive erosion control plan will be required as part of the civil permit application.
• Prior to permit issuance, the project proponent shall post a financial guarantee in accordance with PMC 21.10.160 in the amount of 125% of the cost of the stormwater system.
• A Stormwater Systems Development fee will be assessed for each new equivalent service unit (ESU) in accordance with PMC Chapter 14.26. Each ESU is equal to 2,800 square feet of ‘hard’ surface. The current SDC as of this writing is $3,560.00 per ESU.
• Stormwater Systems Development fees are due at the time of site development permit or in the case where no site development permit is required, at the time of building permit issuance for the individual lot(s); and the fees do not vest until the time of site development permit issuance, or at the time of building permit issuance in the case where a site development permit is not required.
• A Construction Stormwater General Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Ecology if any land disturbing activities such as clearing, grading, excavating and/or demolition will disturb one or more acres of land, or are part of larger common plan of development or sale that will ultimately disturb one or more acres of land.
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
STREET:
• Half-street improvements shall be completed along the entire property frontage and include curb, gutter, sidewalk, roadway base, pavement, street lighting, and drainage. Dedication of right-of-way may be required to provide for adequate roadway section. [PMC 11.08.120, 11.08.130, 19.12.050(1)]
• Existing public utilities that are in conflict with proposed frontage improvements shall be relocated as necessary to meet all applicable City, State, and Federal requirements.
• Existing private utilities (gas, telcom, cable, etc…) that are in conflict with City maintained right-of-way and utilities shall be relocated outside of the travelled road section, i.e., behind the curb under the sidewalk area.
• Upon civil permit application, the following items shall be provided:
- Road plans shall include a plan and profile view of the roadway indicating both the centerline and flow line elevations. [PMC 17.42 & CS 2.2]
- A separate street lighting and channelization plan shall be provided in accordance with City Standards.
- Commercial and Multi-family projects shall provide an autoturn analysis for the largest anticipated vehicle that would access the site. Curb radii and entrance dimensions shall be increased as necessary to allow vehicles to access the site without encroaching into adjacent lanes of traffic.
- Root barriers in accordance with City Standard Detail 01.02.03 shall be installed for all street trees within ten (10) feet of the public ROW.
- Wheel chair ramps, accessible routes, etc. shall be constructed in accordance with City Standards and current ADA regulations. If there is a conflict between the City Standards and ADA regulations, the ADA regulations shall take precedence over the City’s requirements. [PMC 17.42]
- Any surface area proposed for parking, drive aisle, or outdoor storage shall be paved with asphalt or concrete. [PMC 20.30.045(3), 20.35.035(3), 20.44.045(2)]
• Any curb, gutter, sidewalk, or other existing improvements which currently do not meet City Standards, or are damaged during construction, shall be replaced. [PMC 11.08.020]
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
GRADING:
• A Grading Plan conforming to all requirements of PMC Section 21.14.120 will be required for this project. The Plan shall be prepared by a Civil Engineer licensed in the State of Washington. [PMC 21.14.070]
• A geotechnical report conforming to all requirements PMC Sections 21.14.150 and 21.14.160 will be required for this project. The Report shall be prepared by a Civil Engineer or Engineering Geologist licensed in the State of Washington. Prior to final acceptance of this project, the author of the Report shall provide certification to the City the project was constructed in accordance with the recommendations contained in the report.
• Cross sections will be required at various points along the property lines in accordance with City Standards Section 502 and 503 to ensure no impact from storm water damming or runoff. [PMC 17.42 & CS 502.1]
• At the time of civil permit application, the following notes shall be added to the first sheet of the TESCP:
-“At any time during construction it is determined by the City that mud and debris are being tracked onto public streets with insufficient cleanup, all work shall cease on the project until this condition is corrected. The contractor and/or the owner shall immediately take all steps necessary to prevent future tracking of mud and debris into the public ROW, which may include the installation of a wheel wash facility on-site.”
-“Contractor shall designate a Washington Department of Ecology certified erosion and sediment control leadperson, and shall comply with the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) prepared for this project.”
-“Sediment-laden runoff shall not be allowed to discharge beyond the construction limits in accordance with the Project’s NPDES General Stormwater Permit.”
• RCW 19.122 requires all owners of underground facilities to notify pipeline companies of scheduled excavations through the one-number locator service if proposed excavation is within 100 feet. Notification must occur in a window of not less than 2 business days but not more than 10 business days before beginning the excavation. If a transmission pipeline company is notified that excavation work will occur near a pipeline, a representative of the company must consult with the excavator on-site prior to excavation.
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
|
|
|
Fire Review
|
Revisions Required
|
01/23/2023
|
01/19/2023
|
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
1. Current code cycle is 2018 IFC, IBC, upcoming code cycle will be adopted in July and adopt the 2021 IFC, IBC.
2. Apply the 2021 IFC Appendix D to site plans.
3. Provide an aerial site plan not in 3D showing all dimensions. Plans should include streets, sidewalks, building setbacks, building footprint, fire lanes, etc...
4. Not enough information for a full review.
|
|
|
Building Review
|
No Comments
|
01/23/2023
|
01/13/2023
|
|
|
|
|
External Agency Review
|
Revisions Required
|
01/23/2023
|
01/03/2023
|
|
|
|
|