Review Type
Outcome
Est. Completion Date
Completed
Planning Review
Approved
08/03/2022
07/18/2022
Reviewer:
Corrections:
Correction 1:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Based on the proposed cut and fill cubic yard volumes, a Standalone SEPA will be required. Per PMC 21.04.240, the maximum fill or excavation allowed as a categorically exempt activity from SEPA shall be 500 cubic yards. The proposed cut and fill exceeds the 500 cubic yards threshold. [civil permit set, pg. 1]
Engineering Civil Review
Approved
08/03/2022
07/14/2022
Reviewer:
Corrections:
Correction 1:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Revise Note #7 to match the schedule in The Civil Permit Design Checklist, found at: https://www.cityofpuyallup.org/documentcenter/view/8870[Civil Plans, Sheets C2-101, C2-102]
Correction 2:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Please provide geotechnical report in resubmittal under the separate CityView GeoTech Report Section. [SSP, Page 5]
Correction 3:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per Section I-3.1.1 in the ECY Manual, a Geotechnichal report is required for sites developing over 2,000 sf in new/replaced hard surface. Provide geotechnical report in resubmittal under the separate CityView GeoTech Report Section. [SSP, Page 5]
Correction 4:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Note 7 in General Notes has not been revised per previous comments. Note 7 should read: "From April 1 to October 31 all disturbed areas at final grade & all exposed areas that are scheduled to remain unworked for 30+ days shall be stabilized within 10 days. 2. From November 1 to March 31 all exposed soils at final grade shall be stabilized immediately using permanent or temporary measures. Exposed soils with an area +5,000 sqft that are scheduled to remain unworked for more than 24 hrs and exposed areas of less than 5,000 sqft that will remain unworked for more than 7 days shall be stabilized immediately. All disturbed areas which are not planned to be constructed on within 90 days from time of clearing & grading shall be revegetated with the native vegetation."
Correction 5:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Revise sentence segment "Minimum Requirements 1-5 apply to" to match the findings from the flow chart.
Correction 6:
See Document Markup
Comments:
The infiltration rate is shown to be referenced by "the geotechnical Engineer." State the company of the engineer, the report the engineer made the recommendation in, and the date that report was stamped. Additionally, provide the report you are referencing in the separate CityView Submittal requirement.
Public Works Water Review
VOID
08/03/2022
07/14/2022
Reviewer:
Public Works Streets Review
VOID
08/03/2022
07/14/2022
Reviewer:
Public Works Collection Review
VOID
08/03/2022
07/14/2022
Reviewer:
Fire Review
VOID
08/03/2022
07/14/2022
Reviewer:
Engineering Traffic Review
VOID
08/03/2022
07/14/2022
Reviewer:
Public Works Streets Review
VOID
07/21/2022
07/12/2022
Reviewer:
Public Works Collection Review
Approved
07/21/2022
07/11/2022
Reviewer:
Planning Review
Approved
07/21/2022
07/08/2022
Reviewer:
Corrections:
Correction 1:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide a landscape sheet to show what you're doing to address disturbed landscaping [civil permit plan set, pg. 9]
Correction 2:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Remove Existing
Landscape A
Correction 3:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Remove Existing
Landscape Ar
Correction 4:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Based on the proposed cut and fill cubic yard volumes, a Standalone SEPA will be required. Per PMC 21.04.240, the maximum fill or excavation allowed as a categorically exempt activity from SEPA shall be 500 cubic yards. The proposed cut and fill exceeds the 500 cubic yards threshold.
After receiving clarification from the Director, SEPA will NOT be required as cut and fill individually are both below 500 cubic yards.
Public Works Water Review
Approved
07/21/2022
07/07/2022
Reviewer:
Engineering Civil Review
Failed
07/21/2022
07/06/2022
Reviewer:
Corrections:
Correction 1:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Correction 2:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Revise Note #7 to match the schedule in The Civil Permit Design Checklist, found at: https://www.cityofpuyallup.org/documentcenter/view/8870[Civil Plans, Sheets C2-101, C2-102]
Correction 3:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Only Provide TESC Plan. [CSWPP, Page 33]
Correction 4:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Remove "to be removed" from table. [Civil Plans, C1-001]
Correction 5:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Combine "New Hard Surfaces" and Replaced Hard Surfaces" tables. [SSP, Page 2]
Correction 6:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Remove "to be removed" from table. [SSP, Page 2]
Correction 7:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide a breakdown of existing and proposed surface areas for all disturbed area in square feet. Acres can be Hyphenated. [Civil Plans, Pg 1 of 21]
Correction 8:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide Site Cut/Fill Volume calculations with a net cut/fill total. [Civil Plans, Pg 1 of 21]
Correction 9:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Include stamped survey of Project site per Section 2.1 of the City of Puyallup Design Standards. [Civil Plans, Pg 1 of 21]
Correction 10:
See Document Markup
Comments:
The current City Datum to be used for projects is NAVD88 for vertical and NAD83/91 for horizontal. [Civil Plans, Pg 1 of 21]
Correction 11:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Update Plan Approval block to the latest version in Section 1.4 of the City of Puyallup Design Standards.[Civil Plans, All Pages]
Correction 12:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Page numbering is incomplete or incorrect on a number of sheets. Revise Accordingly. [Civil Plans, All Pages]
Correction 13:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Remove "Composite" from all applicable titles. [Civil Plans, All Pages]
Correction 14:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add Sheet Total [Civil Plans, All pages]
Correction 15:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add a period. [Civil Plans, Pg 2 of 21]
Correction 16:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add a period. [Civil Plans, Pg 2 of 21]
Correction 17:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add a period. [Civil Plans, Pg 2 of 21]
Correction 18:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add a period. [Civil Plans, Pg 2 of 21]
Correction 19:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Update Stormwater Notes Per Latest Design Standards Section 207. [Civil Plans, Pg 2 of 21]
Correction 20:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Update Water Notes Per Latest Design Standards Section 304. [Civil Plans, Pg 2 of 21]
Correction 21:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Update Sanitary Sewer Notes Per Latest Design Standards Section 405. [Civil Plans, Pg 2 of 21]
Correction 22:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Combine C1-102 with C3-301. Add a blank page in its place to keep comments on respective pages [Civil Plans, C1-102]
Correction 23:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show utility sawcuts on each sheet [Civil Plans, C1-102]
Correction 24:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Label Existing Fire Hydrant. [Civil Plans, Sheet C1-201]
Correction 25:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Construction entrance to be minimum 100' long per standard detail 05.01.01. [Civil Plans, Sheet C2-101]
Correction 26:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide inlet protection at all inlets down grade from limits of disturbance. [Civil Plans, Sheet C2-101]
Correction 27:
See Document Markup
Comments:
What are you doing to protect from silt laden runoff on the southern limits of disturbance? [Civil Plans, Sheet C2-101]
Correction 28:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show clearing limits on each TESC and demolition sheet. [Civil Plans, Sheets C2-101, C2-102, C2-301]
Correction 29:
See Document Markup
Comments:
State the location where the water will be discharged. [Civil Plans, Sheet C2-101]
Correction 30:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show within limits of disturbance on C2-101 and C2-301 all proposed utility cuts into the existing pavement. [Civil Plans, C2-101]
Correction 31:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide calculations for Sediment trap sizing per the ECY Storm Manual. [Civil Plans, Sheet C2-101]
Correction 32:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show approximate check dam locations. [Civil Plans, Sheet C2-101]
Correction 33:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show staging area. [Civil Plans, Sheets C2-101, C2-102, C2-301]
Correction 34:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add demo tree symbol to legend. [Civil Plans, Sheets C2-101, C2-102, C2-301]
Correction 35:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per Section 503 of the Design Standards, show existing trees 6 inches diameter at breast height or larger, which are proposed to be removed, or retained. The location, size and species of each tree shall be shown.
Correction 36:
See Document Markup
Comments:
label fire hydrant to remain and be protected. [Civil Plans, C2-301]
Correction 37:
See Document Markup
Comments:
label fire hydrant to remain and be protected. [Civil Plans, C2-301]
Correction 38:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add tree protection notes. [Civil Plans, Sheets C2-101, C2-102, C2-301]
Correction 39:
See Document Markup
Comments:
provide a structure table with rim and inverts for all proposed storm structures to verify pipe cover. [Civil Plans, C3-101]
Correction 40:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show Rim/invert information for existing catch basins directly upstream/downstream of proposed tie-in. [Civil Plans, C3-101]
Correction 41:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show that minimum pipe cover Per Section 200 of the Design Standards is provided or use DIP. [Civil Plans, C3-101]
Correction 42:
See Document Markup
Comments:
match pipe crowns at this connection. See Section 204.8, Note No. 5 in the Design Standards for this requirement. [Civil Plans, C3-101]
Correction 43:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show on Storm Plans where these sections are located. [Civil Plans, C3-201]
Correction 44:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show existing contour labels. [Civil Plans, C3-501]
Correction 45:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show proposed contour labels. [Civil Plans, C3-501]
Correction 46:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Revise text overlap. [Civil Plans, C3-501]
Correction 47:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify slope labels are pulling from correct surface or revise surface slopes. [Civil Plans, C3-501]
Correction 48:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Match proposed contours with existing contours. [Civil Plans, C3-501]
Correction 49:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show spot elevations. [Civil Plans, C3-501]
Correction 50:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show minimum pipe cover is provided or use DIP. [Civil Plans, C4-101]
Correction 51:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Which SS line is the force main?Please move leader for clarity. [Civil Plans, C4-101]
Correction 52:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show location of keynote #3 on plans. [Civil Plans, C4-101]
Correction 53:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show location of keynote #1 on plans. [Civil Plans, C4-101]
Correction 54:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add utility pothole note to this sheet. [Civil Plans, C4-101]
Correction 55:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Is the double check valve being re-used? [Civil Plans, Sheet C5-101]
Correction 56:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add utility pothole note to this sheet. [Civil Plans, C4-101]
Correction 57:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Replace COP Details with updated details. [Civil Plans, C5-201]
Correction 58:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add Site specific narrative to each applicable element in these locations. narrative from the SWPP provided in the Storm Report may be applicable here. [CSWPP, Page 7]
Correction 59:
See Document Markup
Comments:
revise with wattle. [CSWPPP, Page 10]
Correction 60:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Please provide geotechnical report in resubmittal under the separate CityView GeoTech Report Section. [SSP, Page 5]
Correction 61:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per Section I-3.1.1 in the ECY Manual, a Geotechnichal report is required for sites developing over 2,000 sf in new/replaced hard surface. Provide geotechnical report in resubmittal under the separate CityView GeoTech Report Section. [SSP, Page 5]
Correction 62:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Note 7 in General Notes has not been revised per previous comments. Note 7 should read: "From April 1 to October 31 all disturbed areas at final grade & all exposed areas that are scheduled to remain unworked for 30+ days shall be stabilized within 10 days. 2. From November 1 to March 31 all exposed soils at final grade shall be stabilized immediately using permanent or temporary measures. Exposed soils with an area +5,000 sqft that are scheduled to remain unworked for more than 24 hrs and exposed areas of less than 5,000 sqft that will remain unworked for more than 7 days shall be stabilized immediately. All disturbed areas which are not planned to be constructed on within 90 days from time of clearing & grading shall be revegetated with the native vegetation."
Correction 63:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Revise sentence segment "Minimum Requirements 1-5 apply to" to match the findings from the flow chart.
Engineering Traffic Review
VOID
07/21/2022
07/05/2022
Reviewer:
Fire Review
Approved
07/21/2022
07/04/2022
Reviewer:
Planning Review
Failed
06/28/2022
06/29/2022
Reviewer:
Corrections:
Correction 1:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide a landscape sheet to show what you're doing to address disturbed landscaping [civil permit plan set, pg. 9]
Correction 2:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Remove Existing
Landscape A
Correction 3:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Remove Existing
Landscape Ar
Correction 4:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Based on the proposed cut and fill cubic yard volumes, a Standalone SEPA will be required. Per PMC 21.04.240, the maximum fill or excavation allowed as a categorically exempt activity from SEPA shall be 500 cubic yards. The proposed cut and fill exceeds the 500 cubic yards threshold. [civil permit set, pg. 1]
Engineering Civil Review
Failed
06/28/2022
06/21/2022
Reviewer:
Corrections:
Correction 1:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide a breakdown of existing and proposed surface areas for all disturbed area in square feet. Acres can be Hyphenated.
Correction 2:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide Site Cut/Fill Volume calculations with a net cut/fill total.
Correction 3:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Update Plan Approval block to the latest version in Section 1.4 of the Design Standards
Correction 4:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide a breakdown of existing and proposed surface areas for all disturbed area in square feet. Acres can be Hyphenated. [Civil Plans, Pg 1 of 21]
Correction 5:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide Site Cut/Fill Volume calculations with a net cut/fill total. [Civil Plans, Pg 1 of 21]
Correction 6:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Include stamped survey of Project site per Section 2.1 of the City of Puyallup Design Standards. [Civil Plans, Pg 1 of 21]
Correction 7:
See Document Markup
Comments:
The current City Datum to be used for projects is NAVD88 for vertical and NAD83/91 for horizontal. [Civil Plans, Pg 1 of 21]
Correction 8:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Update Plan Approval block to the latest version in Section 1.4 of the City of Puyallup Design Standards.[Civil Plans, All Pages]
Correction 9:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Page numbering is incomplete or incorrect on a number of sheets. Revise Accordingly. [Civil Plans, All Pages]
Correction 10:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Remove "Composite" from all applicable titles. [Civil Plans, All Pages]
Correction 11:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add Sheet Total [Civil Plans, All pages]
Correction 12:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add a period. [Civil Plans, Pg 2 of 21]
Correction 13:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add a period. [Civil Plans, Pg 2 of 21]
Correction 14:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add a period. [Civil Plans, Pg 2 of 21]
Correction 15:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add a period. [Civil Plans, Pg 2 of 21]
Correction 16:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Update Stormwater Notes Per Latest Design Standards Section 207. [Civil Plans, Pg 2 of 21]
Correction 17:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Update Water Notes Per Latest Design Standards Section 304. [Civil Plans, Pg 2 of 21]
Correction 18:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Update Sanitary Sewer Notes Per Latest Design Standards Section 405. [Civil Plans, Pg 2 of 21]
Correction 19:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Combine C1-102 with C3-301. Add a blank page in its place to keep comments on respective pages [Civil Plans, C1-102]
Correction 20:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show utility sawcuts on each sheet [Civil Plans, C1-102]
Correction 21:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Label Existing Fire Hydrant. [Civil Plans, Sheet C1-201]
Correction 22:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Construction entrance to be minimum 100' long per standard detail 05.01.01. [Civil Plans, Sheet C2-101]
Correction 23:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide inlet protection at all inlets down grade from limits of disturbance. [Civil Plans, Sheet C2-101]
Correction 24:
See Document Markup
Comments:
What are you doing to protect from silt laden runoff on the southern limits of disturbance? [Civil Plans, Sheet C2-101]
Correction 25:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show clearing limits on each TESC and demolition sheet. [Civil Plans, Sheets C2-101, C2-102, C2-301]
Correction 26:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Revise Note #7 to match the schedule in The Civil Permit Design Checklist, found at: https://www.cityofpuyallup.org/documentcenter/view/8870[Civil Plans, Sheets C2-101, C2-102]
Correction 27:
See Document Markup
Comments:
State the location where the water will be discharged. [Civil Plans, Sheet C2-101]
Correction 28:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show within limits of disturbance on C2-101 and C2-301 all proposed utility cuts into the existing pavement. [Civil Plans, C2-101]
Correction 29:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide calculations for Sediment trap sizing per the ECY Storm Manual. [Civil Plans, Sheet C2-101]
Correction 30:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show approximate check dam locations. [Civil Plans, Sheet C2-101]
Correction 31:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show staging area. [Civil Plans, Sheets C2-101, C2-102, C2-301]
Correction 32:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add demo tree symbol to legend. [Civil Plans, Sheets C2-101, C2-102, C2-301]
Correction 33:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per Section 503 of the Design Standards, show existing trees 6 inches diameter at breast height or larger, which are proposed to be removed, or retained. The location, size and species of each tree shall be shown.
Correction 34:
See Document Markup
Comments:
label fire hydrant to remain and be protected. [Civil Plans, C2-301]
Correction 35:
See Document Markup
Comments:
label fire hydrant to remain and be protected. [Civil Plans, C2-301]
Correction 36:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add tree protection notes. [Civil Plans, Sheets C2-101, C2-102, C2-301]
Correction 37:
See Document Markup
Comments:
provide a structure table with rim and inverts for all proposed storm structures to verify pipe cover. [Civil Plans, C3-101]
Correction 38:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show Rim/invert information for existing catch basins directly upstream/downstream of proposed tie-in. [Civil Plans, C3-101]
Correction 39:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show that minimum pipe cover Per Section 200 of the Design Standards is provided or use DIP. [Civil Plans, C3-101]
Correction 40:
See Document Markup
Comments:
match pipe crowns at this connection. See Section 204.8, Note No. 5 in the Design Standards for this requirement. [Civil Plans, C3-101]
Correction 41:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show on Storm Plans where these sections are located. [Civil Plans, C3-201]
Correction 42:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Min 1" separation from permeable layer and check damns. See figure V-5.3.6 in the ECY Manual. [Civil Plans, C3-201]
Correction 43:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Will heavy trucks access the site on the proposed permeable pavement, or will it be restricted to pedestrian access? If vehicles will access this pavement Please provide geotechnical report with section recommendations for the applicable vehicle or pedestrian loading. If this is for pedestrian access only show on plans how vehicles will be restricted from use. [Civil Plans, C-3-401]
Correction 44:
See Document Markup
Comments:
See City Standard Detail 01.01.07A for minimum road section. [Civil Plans, C-3-401]
Correction 45:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show existing contour labels. [Civil Plans, C3-501]
Correction 46:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show proposed contour labels. [Civil Plans, C3-501]
Correction 47:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Revise text overlap. [Civil Plans, C3-501]
Correction 48:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify slope labels are pulling from correct surface or revise surface slopes. [Civil Plans, C3-501]
Correction 49:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Match proposed contours with existing contours. [Civil Plans, C3-501]
Correction 50:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show spot elevations. [Civil Plans, C3-501]
Correction 51:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show minimum pipe cover is provided or use DIP. [Civil Plans, C4-101]
Correction 52:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Which SS line is the force main?Please move leader for clarity. [Civil Plans, C4-101]
Correction 53:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show location of keynote #3 on plans. [Civil Plans, C4-101]
Correction 54:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show location of keynote #1 on plans. [Civil Plans, C4-101]
Correction 55:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add utility pothole note to this sheet. [Civil Plans, C4-101]
Correction 56:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Is the double check valve being re-used? [Civil Plans, Sheet C5-101]
Correction 57:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add utility pothole note to this sheet. [Civil Plans, C4-101]
Correction 58:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Replace COP Details with updated details. [Civil Plans, C5-201]
Correction 59:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide a Table of existing pervious and hard surfaces and a table of proposed new hard surfaces, replaced hard surfaces, and new/replaced pervious surfaces. [SSP, Page 2]
Correction 60:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Note: Permeable pavement is considered Hard surface when analyzing applicability for storm requirements. Per The ECY Manual under Volume 1, section 2.2 Exemptions, pavement is considered new hard surface when being added in place of gravel/ballast, Gravel surfacing is considered hard surface area and must be mitigated per stormwater requirements. [SSP, Page 2]
Correction 61:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Based on provided site plan and numbers provided in the storm report, the Project will be adding greater than 5,000 sf of new hard surface. See note on page 2 of the storm report for information on what is a new hard surface.Show in the requested tables the project does not add 5,000 sf or more in new hard surface or show how MR 6-9 will be satisfied. The outcome for mitigation measures will likely be similar. [SSP, Page 3]
Correction 62:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use List 2 if all requirements apply. [SSP, Page 4]
Correction 63:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Will heavy trucks access the site on the new/replaced permeable pavement, or will it be restricted to pedestrian access? If vehicles will access this pavement, it is considered pollution generating and will be subject to water quality treatment per Volume 1 Section 2.5.6 of the ECY Manual. If this is for pedestrian access only, show how vehicles will be restricted from use. [SSP, Page 5]
Correction 64:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Please provide geotechnical report in resubmittal under the separate CityView GeoTech Report Section. [SSP, Page 5]
Correction 65:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Duplicated information. Merge this information with the CSWPP submitted separately and either keep it separate and reference it here. [SSP, Appendix A ]
Correction 66:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Included revised TESC Plan. [SSP, Appendix B ]
Correction 67:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Included revised Storm Plan. [SSP, Appendix B ]
Correction 68:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Include revised WWHM reflecting revised pavement section. [SSP, Appendix C ]
Correction 69:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add Site specific narrative to each applicable element in these locations. narrative from the SWPP provided in the Storm Report may be applicable here. [CSWPP, Page 7]
Correction 70:
See Document Markup
Comments:
revise with wattle. [CSWPPP, Page 10]
Correction 71:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Only Provide TESC Plan. [CSWPP, Page 33]
Correction 72:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Remove "to be removed" from table. [Civil Plans, C1-001]
Correction 73:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Combine "New Hard Surfaces" and Replaced Hard Surfaces" tables. [SSP, Page 2]
Correction 74:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Remove "to be removed" from table. [SSP, Page 2]
Public Works Streets Review
VOID
06/28/2022
06/17/2022
Reviewer:
Engineering Traffic Review
VOID
06/28/2022
06/10/2022
Reviewer:
Public Works Water Review
Approved
06/28/2022
06/10/2022
Reviewer:
Corrections:
Correction 1:
See Document Markup
Comments:
WSF SillyVille Train Civil Sheet C1-201: Relabel these as Existing Water Meter and RPBA not Power
Correction 2:
See Document Markup
Comments:
WSF SillyVille Train Civil Sheet C5-101: To avoid confusion change call-out to read Connect to Existing WSF Water Line after RPBA
Correction 3:
See Document Markup
Comments:
WSF SillyVille Train Civil Sheet C5-101: Do you want your private water line to run under existing shed, or will shed be moved?
Public Works Collection Review
Approved
06/28/2022
06/09/2022
Reviewer:
Fire Review
Approved
06/28/2022
06/09/2022
Reviewer:
Public Works Water Review
Failed
05/21/2022
05/25/2022
Reviewer:
Corrections:
Correction 1:
See Document Markup
Comments:
WSF SillyVille Train Civil Sheet C1-201: Relabel these as Existing Water Meter and RPBA not Power
Correction 2:
See Document Markup
Comments:
WSF SillyVille Train Civil Sheet C5-101: To avoid confusion change call-out to read Connect to Existing WSF Water Line after RPBA
Correction 3:
See Document Markup
Comments:
WSF SillyVille Train Civil Sheet C5-101: Do you want your private water line to run under existing shed, or will shed be moved?
Public Works Collection Review
Approved
05/21/2022
05/25/2022
Reviewer:
Planning Review
Failed
05/21/2022
05/18/2022
Reviewer:
Corrections:
Correction 1:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide a landscape sheet to show what you're doing to address disturbed landscaping [civil permit plan set, pg. 9]
Correction 2:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Remove Existing
Landscape A
Correction 3:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Remove Existing
Landscape Ar
Fire Review
Approved
05/21/2022
05/16/2022
Reviewer:
Public Works Streets Review
Approved
05/21/2022
05/05/2022
Reviewer:
Engineering Civil Review
Failed
05/21/2022
04/22/2022
Reviewer:
Corrections:
Correction 1:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide a breakdown of existing and proposed surface areas for all disturbed area in square feet. Acres can be Hyphenated.
Correction 2:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide Site Cut/Fill Volume calculations with a net cut/fill total.
Correction 3:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Update Plan Approval block to the latest version in Section 1.4 of the Design Standards
Correction 4:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide a breakdown of existing and proposed surface areas for all disturbed area in square feet. Acres can be Hyphenated. [Civil Plans, Pg 1 of 21]
Correction 5:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide Site Cut/Fill Volume calculations with a net cut/fill total. [Civil Plans, Pg 1 of 21]
Correction 6:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Include stamped survey of Project site per Section 2.1 of the City of Puyallup Design Standards. [Civil Plans, Pg 1 of 21]
Correction 7:
See Document Markup
Comments:
The current City Datum to be used for projects is NAVD88 for vertical and NAD83/91 for horizontal. [Civil Plans, Pg 1 of 21]
Correction 8:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Update Plan Approval block to the latest version in Section 1.4 of the City of Puyallup Design Standards.[Civil Plans, All Pages]
Correction 9:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Page numbering is incomplete or incorrect on a number of sheets. Revise Accordingly. [Civil Plans, All Pages]
Correction 10:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Remove "Composite" from all applicable titles. [Civil Plans, All Pages]
Correction 11:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add Sheet Total [Civil Plans, All pages]
Correction 12:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add a period. [Civil Plans, Pg 2 of 21]
Correction 13:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add a period. [Civil Plans, Pg 2 of 21]
Correction 14:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add a period. [Civil Plans, Pg 2 of 21]
Correction 15:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add a period. [Civil Plans, Pg 2 of 21]
Correction 16:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Update Stormwater Notes Per Latest Design Standards Section 207. [Civil Plans, Pg 2 of 21]
Correction 17:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Update Water Notes Per Latest Design Standards Section 304. [Civil Plans, Pg 2 of 21]
Correction 18:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Update Sanitary Sewer Notes Per Latest Design Standards Section 405. [Civil Plans, Pg 2 of 21]
Correction 19:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Combine C1-102 with C3-301. Add a blank page in its place to keep comments on respective pages [Civil Plans, C1-102]
Correction 20:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show utility sawcuts on each sheet [Civil Plans, C1-102]
Correction 21:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Label Existing Fire Hydrant. [Civil Plans, Sheet C1-201]
Correction 22:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Construction entrance to be minimum 100' long per standard detail 05.01.01. [Civil Plans, Sheet C2-101]
Correction 23:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide inlet protection at all inlets down grade from limits of disturbance. [Civil Plans, Sheet C2-101]
Correction 24:
See Document Markup
Comments:
What are you doing to protect from silt laden runoff on the southern limits of disturbance? [Civil Plans, Sheet C2-101]
Correction 25:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show clearing limits on each TESC and demolition sheet. [Civil Plans, Sheets C2-101, C2-102, C2-301]
Correction 26:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Revise Note #7 to match the schedule in The Civil Permit Design Checklist, found at: https://www.cityofpuyallup.org/documentcenter/view/8870[Civil Plans, Sheets C2-101, C2-102]
Correction 27:
See Document Markup
Comments:
State the location where the water will be discharged. [Civil Plans, Sheet C2-101]
Correction 28:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show within limits of disturbance on C2-101 and C2-301 all proposed utility cuts into the existing pavement. [Civil Plans, C2-101]
Correction 29:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide calculations for Sediment trap sizing per the ECY Storm Manual. [Civil Plans, Sheet C2-101]
Correction 30:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show approximate check dam locations. [Civil Plans, Sheet C2-101]
Correction 31:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show staging area. [Civil Plans, Sheets C2-101, C2-102, C2-301]
Correction 32:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add demo tree symbol to legend. [Civil Plans, Sheets C2-101, C2-102, C2-301]
Correction 33:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per Section 503 of the Design Standards, show existing trees 6 inches diameter at breast height or larger, which are proposed to be removed, or retained. The location, size and species of each tree shall be shown.
Correction 34:
See Document Markup
Comments:
label fire hydrant to remain and be protected. [Civil Plans, C2-301]
Correction 35:
See Document Markup
Comments:
label fire hydrant to remain and be protected. [Civil Plans, C2-301]
Correction 36:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add tree protection notes. [Civil Plans, Sheets C2-101, C2-102, C2-301]
Correction 37:
See Document Markup
Comments:
provide a structure table with rim and inverts for all proposed storm structures to verify pipe cover. [Civil Plans, C3-101]
Correction 38:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show Rim/invert information for existing catch basins directly upstream/downstream of proposed tie-in. [Civil Plans, C3-101]
Correction 39:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show that minimum pipe cover Per Section 200 of the Design Standards is provided or use DIP. [Civil Plans, C3-101]
Correction 40:
See Document Markup
Comments:
match pipe crowns at this connection. See Section 204.8, Note No. 5 in the Design Standards for this requirement. [Civil Plans, C3-101]
Correction 41:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show on Storm Plans where these sections are located. [Civil Plans, C3-201]
Correction 42:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Min 1" separation from permeable layer and check damns. See figure V-5.3.6 in the ECY Manual. [Civil Plans, C3-201]
Correction 43:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Will heavy trucks access the site on the proposed permeable pavement, or will it be restricted to pedestrian access? If vehicles will access this pavement Please provide geotechnical report with section recommendations for the applicable vehicle or pedestrian loading. If this is for pedestrian access only show on plans how vehicles will be restricted from use. [Civil Plans, C-3-401]
Correction 44:
See Document Markup
Comments:
See City Standard Detail 01.01.07A for minimum road section. [Civil Plans, C-3-401]
Correction 45:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show existing contour labels. [Civil Plans, C3-501]
Correction 46:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show proposed contour labels. [Civil Plans, C3-501]
Correction 47:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Revise text overlap. [Civil Plans, C3-501]
Correction 48:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify slope labels are pulling from correct surface or revise surface slopes. [Civil Plans, C3-501]
Correction 49:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Match proposed contours with existing contours. [Civil Plans, C3-501]
Correction 50:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show spot elevations. [Civil Plans, C3-501]
Correction 51:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show minimum pipe cover is provided or use DIP. [Civil Plans, C4-101]
Correction 52:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Which SS line is the force main?Please move leader for clarity. [Civil Plans, C4-101]
Correction 53:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show location of keynote #3 on plans. [Civil Plans, C4-101]
Correction 54:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show location of keynote #1 on plans. [Civil Plans, C4-101]
Correction 55:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add utility pothole note to this sheet. [Civil Plans, C4-101]
Correction 56:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Is the double check valve being re-used? [Civil Plans, Sheet C5-101]
Correction 57:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add utility pothole note to this sheet. [Civil Plans, C4-101]
Correction 58:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Replace COP Details with updated details. [Civil Plans, C5-201]
Correction 59:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide a Table of existing pervious and hard surfaces and a table of proposed new hard surfaces, replaced hard surfaces, and new/replaced pervious surfaces. [SSP, Page 2]
Correction 60:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Note: Permeable pavement is considered Hard surface when analyzing applicability for storm requirements. Per The ECY Manual under Volume 1, section 2.2 Exemptions, pavement is considered new hard surface when being added in place of gravel/ballast, Gravel surfacing is considered hard surface area and must be mitigated per stormwater requirements. [SSP, Page 2]
Correction 61:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Based on provided site plan and numbers provided in the storm report, the Project will be adding greater than 5,000 sf of new hard surface. See note on page 2 of the storm report for information on what is a new hard surface.Show in the requested tables the project does not add 5,000 sf or more in new hard surface or show how MR 6-9 will be satisfied. The outcome for mitigation measures will likely be similar. [SSP, Page 3]
Correction 62:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use List 2 if all requirements apply. [SSP, Page 4]
Correction 63:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Will heavy trucks access the site on the new/replaced permeable pavement, or will it be restricted to pedestrian access? If vehicles will access this pavement, it is considered pollution generating and will be subject to water quality treatment per Volume 1 Section 2.5.6 of the ECY Manual. If this is for pedestrian access only, show how vehicles will be restricted from use. [SSP, Page 5]
Correction 64:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Please provide geotechnical report in resubmittal under the separate CityView GeoTech Report Section. [SSP, Page 5]
Correction 65:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Duplicated information. Merge this information with the CSWPP submitted separately and either keep it separate and reference it here. [SSP, Appendix A ]
Correction 66:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Included revised TESC Plan. [SSP, Appendix B ]
Correction 67:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Included revised Storm Plan. [SSP, Appendix B ]
Correction 68:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Include revised WWHM reflecting revised pavement section. [SSP, Appendix C ]
Correction 69:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add Site specific narrative to each applicable element in these locations. narrative from the SWPP provided in the Storm Report may be applicable here. [CSWPP, Page 7]
Correction 70:
See Document Markup
Comments:
revise with wattle. [CSWPPP, Page 10]
Correction 71:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Only Provide TESC Plan. [CSWPP, Page 33]
Engineering Traffic Review
VOID
05/21/2022
04/07/2022
Reviewer: