| Review Type |
Outcome |
Est. Completion Date |
Completed |
|
Building Review
|
Approved
|
05/31/2024
|
06/03/2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Planning Review
|
Approved
|
05/31/2024
|
05/29/2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add Submittal Item: Downtown Design Review Req.
Additional Submittal Item Required: The project is located in the Downtown Design Guidelines Review Area. The project is therefore subject to design review by the Design Review and Historic Preservation Board (DRHPB) because it meets one of the following scopes of work: all new development projects of any size; or exterior alterations, redevelopment or additions to existing buildings that affect: 25% of an exterior elevation that is a street or alley-facing façade; or 50% of an exterior elevation that is facing a side lot line or adjacent property; buildings constructed prior to 1949. Additional thresholds apply to RM zoned parcels. See the Downtown Design Guidelines (DDGs) pg. 4-5 for more details. This design review is a separate permit application. The application form can be downloaded from the City website here: www.cityofpuyallup.org/DocumentCenter/View/12898/Downtown-Design-Review-Application_2020. Please submit this application form through the City’s online permit portal by applying for the Planning permit called “Downtown Design Review”. The Downtown Design Guidelines can be downloaded at www.cityofpuyallup.org/DocumentCenter/View/1362/Downtown-Design-Guidelines-. Your project will be reviewed by the Board who will approve, approve with conditions or deny your application. You can schedule a pre-application meeting with the Board to receive early feedback before proceeding into the formal design review process. Contact the case planner for further details. Your design review meeting with the Board cannot be scheduled until your landuse permit, if one is required for your project, has been issued its first Design Review Team Comment (DRT) comment letter.
Planning is unable to approve the building permit application until design review is complete.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Planning Correction
Per PLSHP 20220104 Condition of Approval #9: Return official copy of final recorded plat document to City within 1 year of issuance of final DRT letter. Return form and recording instructions can be found at www.cityofpuyallup.org/DocumentCenter/View/14858/SHORT-PLAT-RECORDING-FORM?bidId=. No building permits can be applied for until this official document is returned to the City.
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Storm Review
|
Approved
|
05/31/2024
|
05/29/2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Expand infiltration narratives to include infeasibility criteria from the Ecology Manuals List 2 BMP links. [Storm Report, Page 11]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
From conversation with engineer bioretention feasibility narrative will include the following Ecology Manual infeasibility criteria: The site has limited buildable area outside the wetland buffer and there is geotechnical observation of "relatively impermeable soils" throughout the site which are conditions of a hydraulic restriction layer. [Storm Report, Page 11]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Review
|
Approved
|
05/31/2024
|
05/28/2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Site plan cannot be approved until the stormwater report is approved and all requirements are verified between the two documents. [Site plan Sheet 1 of 3]
|
|
|
|
|
Fire Review
|
Approved
|
05/31/2024
|
05/20/2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Traffic Review
|
Approved
|
05/31/2024
|
05/16/2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Building Review
|
Approved
|
01/30/2024
|
01/30/2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Review
|
Failed
|
01/30/2024
|
01/25/2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Site plan cannot be approved until the stormwater report is approved and all requirements are verified between the two documents. [Site plan Sheet 1 of 3]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Frontage improvements must be designed or fee in lieu must be approved and paid. [Site plan Sheet 1 of 3]
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Traffic Review
|
Approved
|
01/30/2024
|
01/25/2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Storm Review
|
Failed
|
01/30/2024
|
01/24/2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
Due to anticipated comments in short plat permit PLSHP20220104, review is not applicable at this time. Resubmit with updated plans after short plat approval.
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Low spots are draining toward landscaping instead of catch basin. [Site Plan, Sheet 1 of 3]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Fill out the flowchart circling the yes or no describing the site thresholds. {Storm Report, Page 7]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
include why the infiltration trench is not feasible for the other duplex. Include feasibility narrative on downspout dispersion for lot 2. [Storm Report,Page 9]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
A feasible bmp has not been identified in the "other hard surface category" analyize each bmp in the list and cite infeasibility criteria from the manual for each. [Storm Report, Page 9]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Expand on permeable pavement infeasibility. Cite specific infeasibility criteria from Manual. shallowest groundwater is stated at 6.7 feet BGS. permeable pavement criteria is 1 foot below bottom layer. [Storm Report,Page 9]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide a filled out Figure I-3.5 Flow Chart for Determining Wetland Protection Level Requirements from the Ecology Manual. [Storm Report, Page 10]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide O&M Manual. [Storm Report, Page 10]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide inspection forms and site log [SWPPP, Pg 41]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide SWPPP BMP details [SWPPP, Pg 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Reference short plat amendment where storm easement is recorded. [Site Plan, Sheet 1 of 3]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
The City uses the CityView Online Permit Portal to schedule inspections. There is no inspection line to call. [Site Plan, Sheet 1 of 3]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Request for inspections online. Note, Contractor must be a portal user to request inspections [Site Plan, Sheet 1 of 3]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add approximate grading cut/fill quantities in CY. [Site Plan, Sheet 1 of 3]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add stormwater notes per City Design Standards Section 207. [Site Plan, Sheet 3 of 3]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add clean out in perf pipe of interceptor trench Minimum spacing between structures is 100 feet. [Site Plan, Sheet 1 of 3]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add roof drain min slope and lengths. Add cleanouts as needed to achieve min 100' spacing [Site Plan, Sheet 1 of 3]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Show min flow path length. [Site Plan, Sheet 1 of 3]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add inlet protection on all proposed inlets if used during construction [Site Plan, Sheet 1 of 3]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add Type 1 Catch Basin Detail 02.01.02. [Site Plan, Sheet 3 of 3]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add Storm Drain Cleanout Detail 02.01.09. [Site Plan, Sheet 3 of 3]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add 811 call before you dig note [Site Plan, Sheet 1 of 3]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add FEMA floodplain note [Site Plan, Sheet 1 of 3]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add to narrative how Effective impervious surfaces towards MR 7 was reduced to under 10,000, thus making MR 7 no longer required. The manual's glossary lists 3 criteria that is needed to reduce effective impervious surface. This project appears to have some of these criteria. [Storm Report, Page 9]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Effective impervious surfaces towards MR 7 was reduced to under 10,000 sf so this sentence is not applicable [Storm Report, Page 10]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Label Wetland with Category. [Site Plan, Sheet 1 of 3]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
General protection and protection from pollutants is still required. Add to narrative how the project will meet the criteria for each level of protection required. Add additional protection measures to site plan as required. [Storm Report, Page 10]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Show on plans additional wetland protection measures as applicable from stormwater report.
(General protection and pollutant protection measures) [Site Plan, Sheet 1 of 3]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Expand infiltration narratives to include infeasibility criteria from the Ecology Manuals List 2 BMP links. [Storm Report, Page 11]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
From conversation with engineer bioretention feasibility narrative will include the following Ecology Manual infeasibility criteria: The site has limited buildable area outside the wetland buffer and there is geotechnical observation of "relatively impermeable soils" throughout the site which are conditions of a hydraulic restriction layer. [Storm Report, Page 11]
|
|
|
|
|
Planning Review
|
Failed
|
01/30/2024
|
01/24/2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Document Markup
No dispersion trenches, pipes or other storm facilities shall be allowed in the wetland buffer without an approved mitigation plan and hydroperiod analysis. See PMC 21.06.940 (1) (c) for requirements for stormwater facilities in wetland buffers. While you have relocated the stormwater in the out 25% of the wetland buffer, your resubmittal did not address PMC 21.06.940 (1) (c) requirements. In your resubmittal, please provide a response to PMC 21.06.940 (1) (c) (i) - (vi). If mitigation is required, please provide a mitigation plan for 3rd party review.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Planning Correction
Perimeter of wetland buffer shall be staked every 50 ft with permanent buffer signs. Mark on site plan and include required detail. Detail available for download at www.cityofpuyallup.org/1591/Master-Document-List. Signs will be provided by City of Puyallup at no charge. Contact Planner for more details.
|
|
|
Add Submittal Item: Downtown Design Review Req.
Additional Submittal Item Required: The project is located in the Downtown Design Guidelines Review Area. The project is therefore subject to design review by the Design Review and Historic Preservation Board (DRHPB) because it meets one of the following scopes of work: all new development projects of any size; or exterior alterations, redevelopment or additions to existing buildings that affect: 25% of an exterior elevation that is a street or alley-facing façade; or 50% of an exterior elevation that is facing a side lot line or adjacent property; buildings constructed prior to 1949. Additional thresholds apply to RM zoned parcels. See the Downtown Design Guidelines (DDGs) pg. 4-5 for more details. This design review is a separate permit application. The application form can be downloaded from the City website here: www.cityofpuyallup.org/DocumentCenter/View/12898/Downtown-Design-Review-Application_2020. Please submit this application form through the City’s online permit portal by applying for the Planning permit called “Downtown Design Review”. The Downtown Design Guidelines can be downloaded at www.cityofpuyallup.org/DocumentCenter/View/1362/Downtown-Design-Guidelines-. Your project will be reviewed by the Board who will approve, approve with conditions or deny your application. You can schedule a pre-application meeting with the Board to receive early feedback before proceeding into the formal design review process. Contact the case planner for further details. Your design review meeting with the Board cannot be scheduled until your landuse permit, if one is required for your project, has been issued its first Design Review Team Comment (DRT) comment letter.
Planning is unable to approve the building permit application until design review is complete.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Planning Correction
Per PLSHP 20220104 Condition of Approval #9: Return official copy of final recorded plat document to City within 1 year of issuance of final DRT letter. Return form and recording instructions can be found at www.cityofpuyallup.org/DocumentCenter/View/14858/SHORT-PLAT-RECORDING-FORM?bidId=. No building permits can be applied for until this official document is returned to the City.
|
|
|
|
|
Fire Review
|
Approved
|
01/30/2024
|
01/17/2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Planning Review
|
Failed
|
10/30/2023
|
10/30/2023
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Document Markup
No dispersion trenches, pipes or other storm facilities shall be allowed in the wetland buffer without an approved mitigation plan and hydroperiod analysis. See PMC 21.06.940 (1) (c) for requirements for stormwater facilities in wetland buffers. While you have relocated the stormwater in the out 25% of the wetland buffer, your resubmittal did not address PMC 21.06.940 (1) (c) requirements. In your resubmittal, please provide a response to PMC 21.06.940 (1) (c) (i) - (vi). If mitigation is required, please provide a mitigation plan for 3rd party review.
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Setback: 10 ft min setback is required unless the following standards are demonstrated, then a 5ft min setback can be allowed: Five-foot minimum setback, subject to the following requirements:
(a) Entrances serving single units shall have either a minimum 50-square-foot outdoor entrance landing or an entrance threshold that is at least seven inches above the abutting sidewalk level.
(b) Entrances serving multiple units shall have an outdoor entrance landing that is at least 50 square feet per unit served by said entrance or 100 square feet, whichever is less.
(c) Entrance landings are at least three feet higher than the elevation of the street or street sidewalk level and do not extend into the required setback.
(d) Entrance steps may extend into the required setback to give visual emphasis to entries and to connect entrance landings with the right-of-way sidewalk.
(e) The area between the front or side-street lot line and the building shall be landscaped with a mixture of shrubbery and trees sufficient to achieve 75 percent ground coverage within a three-year period. At least 20 percent of the vegetation necessary to achieve required coverage shall consist of deciduous and/or evergreen trees.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Planning Correction
Perimeter of wetland buffer shall be staked every 50 ft with permanent buffer signs. Mark on site plan and include required detail. Detail available for download at www.cityofpuyallup.org/1591/Master-Document-List. Signs will be provided by City of Puyallup at no charge. Contact Planner for more details.
|
|
|
Add Submittal Item: Downtown Design Review Req.
Additional Submittal Item Required: The project is located in the Downtown Design Guidelines Review Area. The project is therefore subject to design review by the Design Review and Historic Preservation Board (DRHPB) because it meets one of the following scopes of work: all new development projects of any size; or exterior alterations, redevelopment or additions to existing buildings that affect: 25% of an exterior elevation that is a street or alley-facing façade; or 50% of an exterior elevation that is facing a side lot line or adjacent property; buildings constructed prior to 1949. Additional thresholds apply to RM zoned parcels. See the Downtown Design Guidelines (DDGs) pg. 4-5 for more details. This design review is a separate permit application. The application form can be downloaded from the City website here: www.cityofpuyallup.org/DocumentCenter/View/12898/Downtown-Design-Review-Application_2020. Please submit this application form through the City’s online permit portal by applying for the Planning permit called “Downtown Design Review”. The Downtown Design Guidelines can be downloaded at www.cityofpuyallup.org/DocumentCenter/View/1362/Downtown-Design-Guidelines-. Your project will be reviewed by the Board who will approve, approve with conditions or deny your application. You can schedule a pre-application meeting with the Board to receive early feedback before proceeding into the formal design review process. Contact the case planner for further details. Your design review meeting with the Board cannot be scheduled until your landuse permit, if one is required for your project, has been issued its first Design Review Team Comment (DRT) comment letter. Therefore, your design review permit will not be accepted until your landuse permit has been submitted (again if one is required for your project). Planning is unable to approve building permit application until design review is complete.
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Storm Review
|
Failed
|
10/30/2023
|
10/30/2023
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
Due to anticipated comments in short plat permit PLSHP20220104, review is not applicable at this time. Resubmit with updated plans after short plat approval.
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Low spots are draining toward landscaping instead of catch basin. [Site Plan, Sheet 1 of 3]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Fill out the flowchart circling the yes or no describing the site thresholds. {Storm Report, Page 7]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
include why the infiltration trench is not feasible for the other duplex. Include feasibility narrative on downspout dispersion for lot 2. [Storm Report,Page 9]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
A feasible bmp has not been identified in the "other hard surface category" analyize each bmp in the list and cite infeasibility criteria from the manual for each. [Storm Report, Page 9]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Expand on permeable pavement infeasibility. Cite specific infeasibility criteria from Manual. shallowest groundwater is stated at 6.7 feet BGS. permeable pavement criteria is 1 foot below bottom layer. [Storm Report,Page 9]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide a filled out Figure I-3.5 Flow Chart for Determining Wetland Protection Level Requirements from the Ecology Manual. [Storm Report, Page 10]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide O&M Manual. [Storm Report, Page 10]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide inspection forms and site log [SWPPP, Pg 41]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide SWPPP BMP details [SWPPP, Pg 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Reference short plat amendment where storm easement is recorded. [Site Plan, Sheet 1 of 3]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
The City uses the CityView Online Permit Portal to schedule inspections. There is no inspection line to call. [Site Plan, Sheet 1 of 3]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Request for inspections online. Note, Contractor must be a portal user to request inspections [Site Plan, Sheet 1 of 3]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add approximate grading cut/fill quantities in CY. [Site Plan, Sheet 1 of 3]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add stormwater notes per City Design Standards Section 207. [Site Plan, Sheet 3 of 3]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add clean out in perf pipe of interceptor trench Minimum spacing between structures is 100 feet. [Site Plan, Sheet 1 of 3]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add roof drain min slope and lengths. Add cleanouts as needed to achieve min 100' spacing [Site Plan, Sheet 1 of 3]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Show min flow path length. [Site Plan, Sheet 1 of 3]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add inlet protection on all proposed inlets if used during construction [Site Plan, Sheet 1 of 3]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add Type 1 Catch Basin Detail 02.01.02. [Site Plan, Sheet 3 of 3]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add Storm Drain Cleanout Detail 02.01.09. [Site Plan, Sheet 3 of 3]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add 811 call before you dig note [Site Plan, Sheet 1 of 3]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add FEMA floodplain note [Site Plan, Sheet 1 of 3]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add to narrative how Effective impervious surfaces towards MR 7 was reduced to under 10,000, thus making MR 7 no longer required. The manual's glossary lists 3 criteria that is needed to reduce effective impervious surface. This project appears to have some of these criteria. [Storm Report, Page 9]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Effective impervious surfaces towards MR 7 was reduced to under 10,000 sf so this sentence is not applicable [Storm Report, Page 10]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Label Wetland with Category. [Site Plan, Sheet 1 of 3]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
General protection and protection from pollutants is still required. Add to narrative how the project will meet the criteria for each level of protection required. Add additional protection measures to site plan as required. [Storm Report, Page 10]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Show on plans additional wetland protection measures as applicable from stormwater report.
(General protection and pollutant protection measures) [Site Plan, Sheet 1 of 3]
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Review
|
Failed
|
10/30/2023
|
10/26/2023
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Site plan cannot be approved until the stormwater report is approved and all requirements are verified between the two documents. [Site plan Sheet 1 of 3]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Frontage improvements must be designed or fee in lieu must be approved and paid. [Site plan Sheet 1 of 3]
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Traffic Review
|
Approved
|
10/30/2023
|
10/25/2023
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Building Review
|
Approved
|
10/30/2023
|
10/23/2023
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Did not locate items listed required to be on on plans to qualify for credits chosen. Page A-0
|
|
|
See Document Markup
1.3 credit requires. revise to match
Energy Report
|
|
|
|
|
Fire Review
|
Approved
|
10/30/2023
|
10/17/2023
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Traffic Review
|
Approved
|
07/25/2023
|
07/25/2023
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
Traffic scoping worksheet will be required. The City policy requires the project trips to be estimated using the Institute of Transportation Engineers’ (ITE) Trip Generation, 11th Edition. In general, trip generation regression equations shall be used when the R2 value is 0.70 or greater. The project trips shall be rounded to the nearest tenth.
The city has adopted a City-Wide Traffic Impact Fee. The project’s proportionate share to this fee program would be determined when the traffic scoping worksheet has been submitted. The $4,500 traffic impact fee per PM peak hour trip shall be paid prior to building permit issuance.
Park impact fee was established by Ordinance 3142 dated July 3, 2017 and shall be charged per new dwelling unit based on its size:
Park Impact Fee (Per residential dwelling Unit):
Less than 500 sqft $1,560.05
500 - 999 sqft $2,313.53
1,000 – 1,999 sqft $3,291.31
2,000 sqft or more $4,017.30
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Review
|
Failed
|
07/25/2023
|
07/24/2023
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Site plan cannot be approved until the stormwater report is approved and all requirements are verified between the two documents. [Site plan Sheet 1 of 3]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Frontage improvements must be designed or fee in lieu must be approved and paid. [Site plan Sheet 1 of 3]
|
|
|
|
|
Fire Review
|
Approved
|
07/25/2023
|
07/19/2023
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Building Review
|
Failed
|
07/25/2023
|
07/19/2023
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Did not locate items listed required to be on on plans to qualify for credits chosen. Page A-0
|
|
|
See Document Markup
1.3 credit requires. revise to match
Energy Report
|
|
|
|
|
Planning Review
|
Failed
|
07/25/2023
|
07/14/2023
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Document Markup
No dispersion trenches, pipes or other storm facilities shall be allowed in the wetland buffer without an approved mitigation plan and hydroperiod analysis. See PMC 21.06.940 (1) (c) for requirements for stormwater facilities in wetland buffers
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Setback: 10 ft min setback is required unless the following standards are demonstrated, then a 5ft min setback can be allowed: Five-foot minimum setback, subject to the following requirements:
(a) Entrances serving single units shall have either a minimum 50-square-foot outdoor entrance landing or an entrance threshold that is at least seven inches above the abutting sidewalk level.
(b) Entrances serving multiple units shall have an outdoor entrance landing that is at least 50 square feet per unit served by said entrance or 100 square feet, whichever is less.
(c) Entrance landings are at least three feet higher than the elevation of the street or street sidewalk level and do not extend into the required setback.
(d) Entrance steps may extend into the required setback to give visual emphasis to entries and to connect entrance landings with the right-of-way sidewalk.
(e) The area between the front or side-street lot line and the building shall be landscaped with a mixture of shrubbery and trees sufficient to achieve 75 percent ground coverage within a three-year period. At least 20 percent of the vegetation necessary to achieve required coverage shall consist of deciduous and/or evergreen trees.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Planning Correction
Perimeter of wetland buffer shall be staked every 50 ft with permanent buffer signs. Mark on site plan and include required detail. Detail available for download at www.cityofpuyallup.org/1591/Master-Document-List. Signs will be provided by City of Puyallup at no charge. Contact Planner for more details.
|
|
|
Add Submittal Item: Downtown Design Review Req.
Additional Submittal Item Required: The project is located in the Downtown Design Guidelines Review Area. The project is therefore subject to design review by the Design Review and Historic Preservation Board (DRHPB) because it meets one of the following scopes of work: all new development projects of any size; or exterior alterations, redevelopment or additions to existing buildings that affect: 25% of an exterior elevation that is a street or alley-facing façade; or 50% of an exterior elevation that is facing a side lot line or adjacent property; buildings constructed prior to 1949. Additional thresholds apply to RM zoned parcels. See the Downtown Design Guidelines (DDGs) pg. 4-5 for more details. This design review is a separate permit application. The application form can be downloaded from the City website here: www.cityofpuyallup.org/DocumentCenter/View/12898/Downtown-Design-Review-Application_2020. Please submit this application form through the City’s online permit portal by applying for the Planning permit called “Downtown Design Review”. The Downtown Design Guidelines can be downloaded at www.cityofpuyallup.org/DocumentCenter/View/1362/Downtown-Design-Guidelines-. Your project will be reviewed by the Board who will approve, approve with conditions or deny your application. You can schedule a pre-application meeting with the Board to receive early feedback before proceeding into the formal design review process. Contact the case planner for further details. Your design review meeting with the Board cannot be scheduled until your landuse permit, if one is required for your project, has been issued its first Design Review Team Comment (DRT) comment letter. Therefore, your design review permit will not be accepted until your landuse permit has been submitted (again if one is required for your project).
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Storm Review
|
Failed
|
07/25/2023
|
07/11/2023
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
Due to anticipated comments in short plat permit PLSHP20220104, review is not applicable at this time. Resubmit with updated plans after short plat approval.
|
|
|
|
