| Review Type |
Outcome |
Est. Completion Date |
Completed |
|
Engineering Review
|
Approved
|
12/29/2025
|
12/22/2025
|
|
|
|
|
Building Review
|
Approved
|
12/29/2025
|
12/22/2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Document Markup
The presumptive soils class of the site is class 5, and vertical foundation pressure and lateral bearing pressure will need to be updated along with any calculations.
|
|
Planning Review
|
Approved
|
12/29/2025
|
12/17/2025
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Traffic Review
|
VOID
|
12/29/2025
|
12/17/2025
|
|
|
|
|
Planning Review
|
Approved
|
12/15/2025
|
12/12/2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Please correct the area of the proposed monument sign (sign "MS"), which is currently exceeding the maximum permitted square footage of monument signs in the CBD zone.
This site exists in the CG-SPO overlay, which requires signs to follow the regulations of the CBD zone (refer to PMC 20.60.045 for sign regulations). Per PMC 20.46.015(7), "Signs. CBD zone sign standards shall apply. The master site sign plan shall be a part of the design review package for any cohesive development."
Per PMC 20.60.045(3), "Monument Signs", the area of monument signs in CBD zones are calculated as 1 sq. ft. for each lineal ft. of street frontage and are not to exceed 64 sq. ft.
See "McDonalds - City of Puyallup - FREESTANDING PLANS", sheet 19 of 20.
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Please identify the setbacks for the site and the distance of the proposed monument sign (sign "MS") from the public right-of-way.
Per PMC 20.60.065(5)(b)(i) and (ii), the proposed 10' tall monument sign (detailed within "McDonalds - City of Puyallup - FREESTANDING PLANS, sheet 19 of 20) is required to have a 10' setback.
PMC 20.60.065(5)(b)(i): "Monument signs shall be set back at least five feet from the public right-of-way, regardless of the setback requirement of the zone."
PMC 20.60.065(5)(b)(ii): "Monument signs shall be no greater in height than one foot above the adjoining finished grade for each foot of setback to a maximum of 10 feet in height."
See "SITE PLAN".
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Please identify the landscaping, grading, and required berm on the site plan.
Per PMC 20.60.065 (5)(a): "The height of a monument sign shall be measured from the finished grade immediately abutting the base of the sign; in no event shall a monument sign be installed on an earthen berm, retaining wall or otherwise artificially created/graded surface as to elevate it above the surrounding landscape in an effort to exceed the maximum height for monument signs set forth herein."
See "SITE PLAN".
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Please identify the sight-distance triangle for the proposed monument sign (sign "MS").
Per PMC 20.60.065(5)(b)(iii), "Placement of monument signs shall not interfere with any vehicular sight-distance requirements, as determined by the city engineer, nor shall it interfere with any pedestrian access."
See "SITE PLAN".
|
|
Engineering Review
|
Approved
|
12/15/2025
|
12/10/2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Inaccurate underground utility plan. Please submit the plans that match the approved PRCCP20241846 permit which have an issue date of 5/7/2025.
|
|
Engineering Traffic Review
|
Approved
|
12/15/2025
|
12/09/2025
|
|
|
|
|
Building Review
|
Failed
|
12/15/2025
|
12/04/2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Document Markup
2 sets of engineering have been submitted. one on 11x17 and another on 24x36. They appear to be duplicates, but drawings should be consolidated into a single set for ease of construction, inspection and ensure there are not an inconsistencies between drawings.
(Engineered Plans)
|
|
|
See Document Markup
The presumptive soils class of the site is class 5, and vertical foundation pressure and lateral bearing pressure will need to be updated along with any calculations. These plans were not updated on second submittal (Flagpole Plans)
|
|
Engineering Review
|
Failed
|
11/04/2025
|
11/03/2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Document Markup
This site plan conflicts with the site plan found in the Sign Program Book. Sign schedules and labels do not match. Please revise both plans accordingly so that they both match.
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Western pull forward (PF) sign obstructs ADA curb ramp flare. Adjust accordingly.
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide an elevation for each of the signs listed here. If applicable, include the depth of the foundation footing to identify and address any conflicts with existing utilities depicted in the underground utility plan.
|
|
|
See Document Markup
This Sign Program Book conflicts with the submitted site plan. Sign schedules and labels do not match. Please revise both plans accordingly so that they both match.
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Inaccurate underground utility plan. Please submit the plans that match the approved PRCCP20241846 permit which have an issue date of 5/7/2025.
|
|
Planning Review
|
Failed
|
11/04/2025
|
10/31/2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Please correct the area of the proposed monument sign (sign "MS"), which is currently exceeding the maximum permitted square footage of monument signs in the CBD zone.
This site exists in the CG-SPO overlay, which requires signs to follow the regulations of the CBD zone (refer to PMC 20.60.045 for sign regulations). Per PMC 20.46.015(7), "Signs. CBD zone sign standards shall apply. The master site sign plan shall be a part of the design review package for any cohesive development."
Per PMC 20.60.045(3), "Monument Signs", the area of monument signs in CBD zones are calculated as 1 sq. ft. for each lineal ft. of street frontage and are not to exceed 64 sq. ft.
See "McDonalds - City of Puyallup - FREESTANDING PLANS", sheet 19 of 20.
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Please identify the setbacks for the site and the distance of the proposed monument sign (sign "MS") from the public right-of-way.
Per PMC 20.60.065(5)(b)(i) and (ii), the proposed 10' tall monument sign (detailed within "McDonalds - City of Puyallup - FREESTANDING PLANS, sheet 19 of 20) is required to have a 10' setback.
PMC 20.60.065(5)(b)(i): "Monument signs shall be set back at least five feet from the public right-of-way, regardless of the setback requirement of the zone."
PMC 20.60.065(5)(b)(ii): "Monument signs shall be no greater in height than one foot above the adjoining finished grade for each foot of setback to a maximum of 10 feet in height."
See "SITE PLAN".
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Please identify the landscaping, grading, and required berm on the site plan.
Per PMC 20.60.065 (5)(a): "The height of a monument sign shall be measured from the finished grade immediately abutting the base of the sign; in no event shall a monument sign be installed on an earthen berm, retaining wall or otherwise artificially created/graded surface as to elevate it above the surrounding landscape in an effort to exceed the maximum height for monument signs set forth herein."
See "SITE PLAN".
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Please identify the sight-distance triangle for the proposed monument sign (sign "MS").
Per PMC 20.60.065(5)(b)(iii), "Placement of monument signs shall not interfere with any vehicular sight-distance requirements, as determined by the city engineer, nor shall it interfere with any pedestrian access."
See "SITE PLAN".
|
|
Engineering Traffic Review
|
Approved
|
11/04/2025
|
10/24/2025
|
|
|
|
|
Building Review
|
Failed
|
11/04/2025
|
10/15/2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Document Markup
2 sets of engineering have been submitted. one on 11x17 and another on 24x36. They appear to be duplicates, but drawings should be consolidated into a single set for ease of construction, inspection and ensure there are not an inconsistencies between drawings.
(Engineered Plans)
|
|
|
See Document Markup
The presumptive soils class of the site is class 5, and vertical foundation pressure and lateral bearing pressure will need to be updated along with any calculations.
|