Review Type
Outcome
Est. Completion Date
Completed
Engineering Traffic Review
Revisions Required
06/13/2022
07/08/2022
Reviewer:
Corrections:
Correction 1:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
Based on comments received from the Puyallup School District Off-site ADA ramp improvements are required at 2nd Ave NE & 4th St NE to accommodate pedestrians walking to/from Stewart Elementary
Correction 2:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
Engineering standards require 8ft sidewalks along frontage for multifamily developments. To meet planning's requirements for 4ft wide street tree cutouts, the City will require a 12ft wide frontage section to be constructed (8ft sidewalk + 4ft wide tree cutouts). This will require the building to be shifted south & ROW dedication. Existing curb alignment shall remain.
Correction 3:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
During civil review, provide a separate streetlighting design.
Correction 4:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
A 30-foot width Commercial Driveway will be required for site access. Please note, the driveway can “neck-down” to the required width on site.
Correction 5:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
Traffic Scoping Worksheet is approved (8.2 pm peak hour trips).
Correction 6:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
Traffic Impact fees (TIF) will be assessed in accordance with fees adopted by ordinance, per PMC 21.10. Impact fees are subject to change and are adopted by ordinance. The applicant shall pay the proportionate impact fees adopted at the time of building permit application
Park impact fees shall be charged per new dwelling unit based on its size. Fees are assessed in accordance with fees adopted by ordinance, per PMC 21.10
School impact fees shall be paid directly to the school district in accordance with adopted fee at the time of collection by the district.
Per Puyallup Municipal Code Section 11.08.135, the applicant/owner would be expected to construct half-street improvements including curb, gutter, planter strip, sidewalk, roadway base, pavement, and street lighting. Any existing improvements which are damaged now or during construction, or which do not meet current City Standards, shall be replaced.
Reviewer Comments:
Planning Review
Revisions Required
06/13/2022
06/21/2022
Reviewer:
Corrections:
Correction 1:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Residential zone line. Relevant to the design review criteria [site plan sheet 1]
Correction 2:
See Document Markup
Comments:
No scale located on plans - please submit with scale shown [site plan sheet 1]
Correction 3:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Convert stalls to 8' X 15' compact stalls [site plan sheet 1]
Correction 4:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide 12' sidewalk - required to provide required 8' walk with 4' X 10' street tree boxes. Depth of rear parking stalls can be reduced by 5' to shift site plan and ROW line to accomodate without impacting bldg footprints [site plan sheet 1]
Correction 5:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Parking lot islands required at 15' at widest point [site plan sheet 1]
Correction 6:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Anticipate detailed comments on plant selection at the time of civil permit [landscape sheet]
Correction 7:
See Document Markup
Comments:
These two parking lot islands will require silva cells on out edge under parking stalls, per standards [landscape sheet]
Correction 8:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Street trees will require silva cells under public sidewalk per optional standard [landscape sheet]
Correction 9:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
SEPA COMMENT: Nisqually tribe requests a cultural resource survey be provided. This will be a condition of approval to be provided at the time of civil permit. See included letter (available in portal / documents & images)
Correction 10:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
SEPA: See May 27, 2022 Ecology SEPA letter. See included letter (available in portal / documents & images)
Correction 11:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
SEPA comment: Please see the May 19, 2022 comment letter from the Puyallup School District. Staff is determining the applicability of this comment letter and the requested condition. Please respond to the comment upon resubmittal. Staff suggests having your project traffic engineer draft a response letter. This condition may involve curb ramps and cross walk paint.
Correction 12:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
See design review spreadsheet from staff. Upon resubmittal of the design review application, please document and itemize each response and relate it back to the guidelines.
Correction 13:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Please show bike parking on site plan
Correction 14:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Is the scale correct on these elevation drawings? The building is measuring over 35' mentioned in the design review narrative. The building height is 35' unless bonuses are eligible [sheet 9 elevations]
Correction 15:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
Please submit lot combination permit.
Correction 16:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
Staff provides the included downtown planned action SEPA project consistency form (see documents and images under permit submittal in Cityview).
Correction 17:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
PMC 20.30.030 (14) requires 14' minimum interior ground floor. Please provide a response with visual exhibit demonstrating compliance.
Correction 18:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
Provide floor area ration (FAR) calculation. Max FAR is 2.0 in CBD. FAR is defined in PMC 20.15.
Correction 19:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
Provide a narrative with supporting site plan exhibits demonstrating compliance with PMC 20.30.031 (3). The design guidelines also require a landscape transition area. Since the building is not entirely zero lot line, the plaza areas appear to best fit subsection (3) which will also allow the project to best meet the public-to-private transition requirements in the DDG guidelines.
Correction 20:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
See PMC 20.55.016 for motorcycle parking options; see PMC 20.55.018 for options to reduce parking (LID).
Correction 21:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
Does the site plan contain a set aside area for loading and unloading to facilitate moving truck parking, Amazon/package delivery, etc.? Is the main drive aisle wide enough to accommodate?
Reviewer Comments:
Engineering Review
Revisions Required
06/13/2022
06/17/2022
Reviewer:
Corrections:
Correction 1:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Revise to acres [Preliminary Stormwater Calculations, Page 5/40]
Correction 2:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Specify units. Report says 4.0 inches per hour [Preliminary Stormwater Calculations, Page 5/40]
Correction 3:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Modeling should include the area of impervious surface entering the facility and then demonstrate the additional capacity to infiltrate the roofs and sidewalks. [Preliminary Stormwater Calculations, Page 5/40]
Correction 4:
See Document Markup
Comments:
If roofs are to be infiltrated within pervious pavement gallery, then the gallery is a defacto infiltration facility and will be subject to infiltration gallery requirements as well as pervious pavement standards. [Preliminary Stormwater Calculations, Page 5/40]
Correction 5:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Vicinity map should show a 1 mile radius around the project site and its geographic relationship to major natural and built features [Vicinity Map]
Correction 6:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
Address existing easement (AFN 9303170533) and show on plans. The easement benefits the City of Puyallup for installation of sewer and overlaps onto parcel 7940100. Structures and most improvements are not allowed to be constructed above easements. The City is evaluating whether or not this easement should be retained.
Reviewer Comments:
Fire Review
Revisions Required
06/13/2022
06/07/2022
Reviewer:
Corrections:
Correction 1:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
1. Comply with pre-app notes. Dimensions needed for review.
2. Show Riser Room, F.D.C, P.I.V, locations on site plan.
Reviewer Comments:
Building Review
Revisions Required
06/13/2022
06/06/2022
Reviewer:
Corrections:
Correction 1:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
1. Plans need to be complete with all building, plumbing, mechanical, energy code
requirements and accessibility requirements items on plans.
2. Need to submit all truss specs with building permit application.
3. Currently we are using all the 2018 codes and the many Washington State
Amendments adopted February 1, 2021.
4. Need to show the required infrastructure for the electric charging stations per 2018
IBC section 429 (Washington State Amendments)
5. Need to show the type A and B units and all specific details on the plans.
6. Clearly define all fire rated assemblies on the plans in detail.
7. All electrical is through the department of L & I electrical division.
8. Need to define all required accessible parking spaces and the accessible route to the
public way on the plans.
9. Need to submit for demolition permit for structures on this property prior to
submitting for building permits.
Reviewer Comments: