Review Type
Outcome
Est. Completion Date
Completed
Engineering Traffic Review
Failed
02/15/2024
02/29/2024
Reviewer:
Corrections:
Correction 1:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
Meridian Driveway:
-Thermoplastic right arrow
-Outbound “RIGHT TURN ONLY” signage
-Private access easement should be modified to account for future SBR turn pocket radius + possible walls.
-“DO NOT ENTER” sign on north side of driveway facing SE to prevent inbound NBL turns.
-As stated in the preliminary site plan review, please include an updated sight distance analysis with next Civil submittal that identifies all sight obstructions. (Street tree placement, railing, guard rail, monument signage, fences, bus pad, etc.)
-Provide detailed dimensions for ramped/mountable edge of curb island. Provide paint details.
Streetlights
-City of Puyallup is actively coordinating with WSDOT to determine scope of necessary improvements. The existing WSDOT streetlights are located in City ROW and it’s unclear which jurisdiction owns and maintains lighting along this segment. The City will coordinate with the applicant once more information is known.
AutoTurn
-Need to see fuel truck and fire apparatus navigating driveway(s)
-Need to coordinate with David Drake (City Fire) if there are additional AutoTurn requirements for site circulation or access.
Frontage
-Along the Meridian frontage, evaluate ADA guidance to determine if railing is required behind the sidewalk.
-If grind/overlay is required, must provide a striping plan.
-Future SBR turn pocket – Is it possible to minimize utilities in planter strip make this future improvement easier?
-To verify ROW dedication and private easement modifications, designer needs to show SBR turn pocket design. Actual construction of SBR turn pocket is not required for this project.
-Bus Stop/Pad/Bench – City of Puyallup will coordinate with Pierce Transit to verify the proposed improvements will meet their requirements.
-City of Puyallup inspectors will verify ADA compliance at WSDOT ramp terminal
-Sidewalk transitions to ADA ramps (north & south) will require modification. See Sheet C6.0 & C6.1
Correction 2:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
-Outbound “RIGHT TURN ONLY” and “DO NOT ENTER” signs are not labeled. Please provide size and MUTCD identification. Move the “DO NOT ENTER” sign slightly farther back from face of curb to remove from sight distance triangle.
-The existing hospital sign will need to be moved away from the driveway. Please place a note that requires the contractor to coordinate with the City on placement
-Private access easement should be modified to account for future SBR turn pocket radius + possible walls. This future improvement will require modifications to driveway design located on private property (outside City ROW). Additionally, owner must allow construction easement for the construction of this turn pocket.
-Right turn arrow at Meridian driveway must be thermoplastic (not chlorinated rubber).
-Unable to locate curb paint details for the mountable island. The side parallel with meridian will be painted white, the other sides will be painted yellow.
-The existing wheelchair ramp on the NE corner of property (WSDOT ramp terminal) will require mitigation to meet ADA compliance.
-The existing WSDOT streetlight along frontage does not meet City standards. City standard streetlight (30ft with 12ft arm) will be required to replace the non-standard WSDOT unit at the same stationing (offset farther from the curb). The City will power the new streetlight from the existing traffic signal at 15th/Meridian. Design will extend conduit/conductors to the south side of the Meridian driveway. The City will install the remaining conduit to connect to the signal. Conduit & j-boxes shall be installed along the entire frontage.
Engineering Civil Review
Failed
02/15/2024
02/26/2024
Reviewer:
Corrections:
Correction 1:
See Document Markup
Comments:
See all review comments from clear, fill and grading permit PRGR20231482. [civils, sheet C2.0]
Correction 2:
See Document Markup
Comments:
See all review comments from clear, fill and grading permit PRGR20231482. [civils, sheet C2.1]
Correction 3:
See Document Markup
Comments:
See all review comments from clear, fill and grading permit PRGR20231482. [civils, sheet C2.2]
Correction 4:
See Document Markup
Comments:
See all review comments from clear, fill and grading permit PRGR20231482. [civils, sheet C2.3]
Correction 5:
See Document Markup
Comments:
During the next submittal, provide a draft right of way dedication form to review. The template form can be found here: chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.cityofpuyallup.org/DocumentCenter/View/7331/Appendix-C-?bidId= [civils, sheet C3.0]
Correction 6:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Revise to curb and gutter to collect and convey stormwater runoff. [site plan, pg 6]
Correction 7:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide utility crossing information. [Sheet C5.0]
Correction 8:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Revise CB #6 to be a solid lid, bypassed stormwater shouldn't be collected after the treatment device. [civils, sheet C5.1]
Correction 9:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Duplicate/overlapped details. Revise accordingly. [civils, sheet C5.6]
Correction 10:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide a yard drain at the low-point of the landscape swale and connect to the storm system. [civils, Sheet C4.1]
Correction 11:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Revise this section of curb to be curb and gutter to convey stormwater to the proposed catch basins. Provide the gutter run slope [civils, sheet C5.]
Correction 12:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Connect the retaining wall drain to the private stormwater system. [civils, sheet C5.1]
Correction 13:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Revise to standard grate. [civils, sheet C6.0]
Correction 14:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide commercial sewer sampling tees per city standard 04.03.04 [civils, sheet C6.0]
Correction 15:
See Document Markup
Comments:
The grease interceptor will be installed per this civil plan set. Include city standards 04.06.01 and 04.06.02 and size the GI per puyallup municipal code 14.06. [civils, sheet C6.0]
Correction 16:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide the sampling box detail within the civil plan set. [civils, sheet C6.0]
Correction 17:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide pipe size and material for water service line. [civils, sheet C6.0]
Correction 18:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide pipe size and material for water service line. [civils, sheet C6.0]
Correction 19:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide pipe size and material for water service line. [civils, sheet C6.1]
Correction 20:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Why is the sidewalk being proposed to be installed at a reverse slope? [civils, sheet C8.0]
Correction 21:
See Document Markup
Comments:
The pierce county transit bench is blurry, provide an updated detail during the next submittal. [civils, sheet C8.3]
Correction 22:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Make a note to amend all disturbed soils per cs 01.02.08a [civils, sheet C2.1]
Correction 23:
See Document Markup
Comments:
City permit number is PRCCP20231423. [drainage report, pg 1]
Correction 24:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Revise preliminary note, this detail will be used for construction. [civils, sheet C5.6]
Correction 25:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Revise treatment flows to match. [civils, sheet C5.6]
Correction 26:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Revise detail overlapping. [civils, sheet C5.7]
Correction 27:
See Document Markup
Comments:
The predeveloped conditions within the WWHM calculation do not match existing conditions basin map on page 33. Revise accordingly. [drainage report, pg 54]
Correction 28:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Clarify that this is oil/water separator calculation for the overall site. [drainage report, pg 123 of 365]
Correction 29:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide a separate oil/water separator calculation for the fuel canopy and car wash. [drainage report, pg 123 of 365]
Correction 30:
See Document Markup
Comments:
These two pipe runs will be underwater a majority of the year as the 30" storm main constantly flows with stormwater. Consider revising. [civils, sheet C5.8]
Correction 31:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Consider revising the sewer service from the trash enclosure to be parallel to the building (setback 10' from the building) and connect into the building's service line. [civils, pg C6.0]
Correction 32:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide the IE for the connection of the roof downspout to the detention system [civils, Sheet C5.0]
Correction 33:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Dimension the riser diameter. [civils, Sheet C5.5]
Correction 34:
See Document Markup
Comments:
To SDMH #3. [civils, sheet C5.5]
Correction 35:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Apply for seperate building permits for each of the underground storage tanks. [civils, Sheet C5.1]
Correction 36:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide the vault access riser detail within this plan set. [civils, Sheet C5.2]
Correction 37:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide a note stating the minimum reinforced concrete strength of the detention vault.The DOE manual specifies a minimum 3,000 psi. [civils, sheet C5.2]
Correction 38:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Apply for a separate building permit for the construction of the detention vault. [civils, sheet C5.2]
Correction 39:
See Document Markup
Comments:
What is this? [civils, Sheet C5.2]
Correction 40:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide area of the proposed vault. [civils, sheet C5.2]
Correction 41:
See Document Markup
Comments:
The vault section C-C is missing the vertical walls within the profile view. [civils, sheet C5.3]
Correction 42:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide a utility crossing table showing all utility IE's/ conflicts similar to what is provided to avoid potential conflicts during construction. [civils, sheet C6.0]
Correction 43:
See Document Markup
Comments:
How is stormwater going to be captured/mitigated at the base of the proposed retaining wall to prevent surcharge on the wall? [civils, Sheet C5.1]
Correction 44:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide the running slope of the proposed gutter?
Correction 45:
See Document Markup
Comments:
These flows appear to be conveyed to CB #1 rather than CB #4. [drainage report, sheet 133 of 365]
Correction 46:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Revise the instances that refer to a separate grading permit to sheet C7.0 of this plan set. [civils, Sheet C5.4]
Correction 47:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide a narrative summarizing how the car wash reclaim is intended to work. [civils, sheet C6.3]
Correction 48:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Include city standard details 02.01.02 and 02.01.03. [civils, sheet C6.5]
Correction 49:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show a max 2% cross slope. [civils, Sheet C8.1]
Correction 50:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Make this a single sidewalk panel 15' in length to meet ADA compliancy rather than 2 panels. [civils, Sheet C8.1]
Correction 51:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Dimension the length of the landings. Revise to be 2% max run and cross-slopes to the maximum extent feasible. [civils, Sheet C8.1]
Correction 52:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide a 3' cross gutter per city standard 01.02.19. [civils, Sheet C8.1]
Correction 53:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Define exactly where this is on sheet C8.0. [civils, Sheet C8.1]
Correction 54:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Replace with city standard 01.01.05. [civils, Sheet C8.3]
Correction 55:
See Document Markup
Comments:
The beam guardrail detail states that curb is to be under the guardrail, revise accordingly. [civils, sheet C4.1]
Correction 56:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Why isn't the guardrail being extended further east to the point of highest elevation/slope. The end of the guardrail here creates a hazard. [civils, sheet C4.1]
Correction 57:
See Document Markup
Comments:
This detail has been updated, revise to standard plan C-20.10-06. [civils, sheet C7.3]
Correction 58:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Replace with updated WSDOT standard detail. [civils, sheet C7.3]
Correction 59:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Note: The roof is considered non-pollution generating and can be routed directly to the detention system if the yard drain is disconnected from the roof drains and re-routed. [drainage report, page 119 of 365.
Correction 60:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide a sizing calculation for the modular wetland unit. [drainage report, pg 119 of 365]
Correction 61:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout the proposed landscape swale. [civils, Sheet C5.1]
Correction 62:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show the car wash re-circulation lines. [civils, sheet C6.1]
Correction 63:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Revise to proposed oil water separator. [civils, sheet C6.7]
Correction 64:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Revise linetype from water to sewer. [civils, Sheet C6.]
Correction 65:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Revise slope to 2% towards planter. [civils, sheet C8.0]
Correction 66:
See Document Markup
Comments:
How deep will this irrigation line be? Ensure irrigation does not conflict with storm lines or treatment BMP on sheet C5.1 [Civils, L4]
Correction 67:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Indicate the trash enclosure dimension required per design standard 208. [civils, sheet C3.0]
Correction 68:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Include city standard 01.02.10 curb cut for the curb and gutter replacement within Meridian. [civils, sheet C8.3]
Correction 69:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide construction note and show required curb cut along the frontage for the curb and gutter replacement. [civils, sheet C8.]
Correction 70:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Install a catch basin to collect gutter runoff and connect to the perpendicular storm main. [civils, Sheet C8.0]
Correction 71:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Replace water purveyor approval block for fire on this sheet. [civils, sheet C6.0]
Correction 72:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Revise water service lines to be 2" poly pipe per City of Puyallup city standards. [civils, sheet C6.0]
Correction 73:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Revise water service lines to be 2" poly pipe per City of Puyallup city standards. [civils, sheet C6.1]
Correction 74:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Fill out this pipe information within the detail. [civils, sheet C6.2]
Correction 75:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide a sizing calculation from the uniform plumbing code, stamped by a professional Engineer. See design standard 402.3 for more information. [civils, sheet C6.5]
Correction 76:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Indicate which lines are reclaim from the tanks back to the car wash. [civils, sheet C6.1]
Correction 77:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Revise to keynote 1. [civils, sheet C6.3]
Correction 78:
See Document Markup
Comments:
The city requires public and private stormwater facilities be segregated per PMC 21.10.190. Revise the reversed sidewalk to be sloped toward the planting strip/ Meridian per city standards. Per previous meeting 1.19.24, the city may allow for the sidewalk to be permeable with check dams. A falling head percolation testing within the location of the sidewalk will be necessary to ensure feasibility. After further research, the on-site and off-site area's have separate discharge areas. The on-site project discharges across SR 512 to the west to Clark's Creek, whereas Meridian is collected by WSDOT's stormwater pipe and traverses NE along SR 512. Revise accordingly. [civils, sheet C8.0]
Correction 79:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Remove sidewalk note regarding reverse grade. [civils, sheet C8.3]
Correction 80:
See Document Markup
Comments:
The existing junction box will need to be relocated out of the proposed sidewalk ramp. [civils, sheet C8.0]
Correction 81:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Include fire hydrant approval block on this sheet. [civil plans, sheet C8.0]
Correction 82:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide a detail for the proposed fence and reference it on this sheet. [civils, sheet C3.0]
Correction 83:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Upgrade ramp to be ADA compliant per previous comment. [civils, sheet C8.0]
Correction 84:
See Document Markup
Comments:
There is an existing junction box or other infrastructure that is located within the gutter that is not shown on this survey. This will need to be relocated outside of the gutter pan and brought up to grade. The infrastructure is currently pooling stormwater. [civils, sheet C8.1]
Correction 85:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Reverse the sidewalk to slope towards Meridian. To avoid an increase in the detention system size, permeable pavement may be utilized for the sidewalk. Provide infiltration testing to show this is feasible. See additional markups regarding separate project threshold discharge areas. [civils, sheet C8.1]
Correction 86:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Replace this wedge of landscape with concrete for ease of wheelchair accessibility. [civils, sheet C8.1]
Correction 87:
See Document Markup
Comments:
The driveway existing grade and flow line are missing from the profile view, revise accordingly. [civils, sheet C8.2]
Correction 88:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Create a note to have the contractor place a silt sock in the downstream CB to the west of this approach during construction. [civils, sheet C8.2]
Correction 89:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show 3' curb cut per city standard. [civils, sheet C8.2]
Correction 90:
See Document Markup
Comments:
This is not a road related project, frontage improvements are supplemental to the project scope, revise this flow chart. [drainage plans, sheet 18]
Correction 91:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per the current Figure I-3.2, all minimum requirements apply to the new hard surfaces and converted vegetation areas, this is not a road related project such that the flow chart must be re-evaluated. [drainage report, pg 48]
Correction 92:
See Document Markup
Comments:
The existing impervious area shown within the existing conditions map is 1.087 acres rather than the shown 0.84 acres. Revise accordingly in combination with the other markup on this page. [drainage report, pg 48]
Correction 93:
See Document Markup
Comments:
The existing basin map states in the existing conditions there is 0.069 acres of land coverage, what is the 0.103 acres representing within the WWHM calculation? [drainage report, pg 49]
Correction 94:
See Document Markup
Comments:
The existing basin map states in the existing conditions there is 0.069 acres of land coverage, what is the 0.017 acres representing within the WWHM calculation? [drainage report, pg 49]
Correction 95:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Public stormwater must be mitigated independently from private stormwater revise the sidewalk in the Meridian from flowing to yard drain #1. [drainage report, pg 166]
Correction 96:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Include yard drain #2 to the basin map which is collecting runoff from the south side of the proposed car wash via landscape swale. [civils, pg 166]
Correction 97:
See Document Markup
Comments:
The plans show this IE at 43.62'. [drainage report, pg 168]
Correction 98:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CB #3 ie is 44.41 revise accordingly. [drainage report, pg 168]
Correction 99:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CB #2 is shown as 43.89 for the IE on the civil plans. [civils, pg 168]
Correction 100:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Indicate the pipe links/nodes within the pipe conveyance basin map. [drainage report, pg 169]
Correction 101:
See Document Markup
Comments:
The nodes in this model don't appear to match the civil plans. SDMH#5 doesn't exist. SDMH#3 does not discharge to the outlet pipe. [drainage report, pg 169]
Correction 102:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per WSDOT Design Manual M 22-01.15 a pedestrian railing appears warranted due to there being a vertical drop greater than 2'-6". See Exhibit 1510-12 Typical Sidewalk Designs. [civils, sheet C4.1]
Correction 103:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Both inlet and outlet pipe are the same 6" diameter, revise accordingly. [civils, sheet C6.2]
Correction 104:
See Document Markup
Comments:
There are several building permits that have been submitted. Provide a specific reference to the plans in question or provide the overall depth of the base. [civils, sheet C7.2]
Correction 105:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show the trash enclosure roof downspouts being connected to the detention system and bypassing treatment as discussed within the stormwater report. [civils, sheet C5.]
Correction 106:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Include 0.28 acres of proposed landscaping. [drainage report, pg 51].
Correction 107:
See Document Markup
Comments:
The roof drains for the convenienece store are routed to catch basin #3 which is treated by the water qualifty vault. Revise accordingly. [drainage report, pg 151]
Correction 108:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide further information/narrative as to how the water quality design flow rate and effective plate surface area was determined for the OWS. [drainage report, pg 155]
Correction 109:
See Document Markup
Comments:
There isn't a section 6.6.2.1 or page 6-144 within the 2019 DOE manual, provide updated reference. [drainage report, pg 156]
Correction 110:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Include a construction sequence. City design standard 501.6 may be used as the basis. [civils, sheet C2.0]
Correction 111:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Include City of Puyallup Illumination notes per design standard 105. [civils, sheet C2.0]
Correction 112:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Reference Fire Construction Plans per PRFI20240124. [civils, sheet C3.0]
Correction 113:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Reference Car Wash building permit per PRCNC20240007 [civils, sheet C3.0]
Correction 114:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Reference Canopy building permit per PRCNC20240010 [civils, sheet C3.0]
Correction 115:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Apply for a separate building permit for the trash enclosure. [civils, sheet C3.0]
Correction 116:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Reference Canopy building permit per PRCNC20240010 [civils, sheet C3.0]
Correction 117:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Reference the detail within this plan set on sheet C8.0. [civils, sheet C3.0]
Correction 118:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Why is this pedestrian access path being provided? The pathway ends at a landscape island/concrete swale rather than a sidewalk. [civils, sheet C3.0]
Correction 119:
See Document Markup
Comments:
The city has determined that the location of this grease interceptor is problematic due to its location to the storm main to the north as this line will be replaced in the near future. Revise the location of the GI to be outside of the 30' stormwater-sewer-water main easement. [civils, sheet C6.0]
Correction 120:
See Document Markup
Comments:
The city has determined that the private street light conflicts with the existing gas and sewer lines. The sewer line will be replaced in the near future. Relocate this light out of the 30' easement. [civils, sheet C6.0]
Correction 121:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Reference Wall building permit per PRRWF20231581. [civils, sheet C3.0]
Correction 122:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide a detail for the proposed fence within the civil plan set. [civils, sheet C3.0]
Correction 123:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show existing grading to match the proposed grade on the tesc plan submitted with the clear, fill and grade permit. This NW corner is proposing upwards of 4' of fill. [civils, sheet C4.0]
Correction 124:
See Document Markup
Comments:
It appears water will be ponding at the base of this slope between the proposed wall and curb/gutter. How will this be mitigated? [civils, sheet C4.1]
Correction 125:
See Document Markup
Comments:
The detail section views for the walls on this sheet state the slope and length will be provided per civil drainage plan. The drainage plan references the structural plans. Revise accordingly. [civils, sheet C4.2]
Correction 126:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show the stormwater drain pipe connected from the proposed wall to the detention system. [civils, sheet C5.1]
Correction 127:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Relocate the bus stop bench outside of the 30' utility easement. The bench is proposed directly over top of the sewer main which will be upgraded as a city Capitol Improvement project in the near future [civils, sheet C8.1]
Correction 128:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Reference building application PRCNC20240013. [civils, sheet C5.0]
Correction 129:
See Document Markup
Comments:
SDMH #3 and #4 plans and stormwater structural table do not match the callouts. SDMH #3 is proposing the flow splitter. [civils, sheet C5.1]
Correction 130:
See Document Markup
Comments:
The WWHM calculation does not match the orifice plate diameter. [civils, sheet C5.4]
Correction 131:
See Document Markup
Comments:
The WWHM calculation and water quality basin map on page 151 of the drainage report do not match. The on-site concrete and asphalt in itself is 5 times more area than what the WWHM calculation is showing. Confirm that the WWHM calculation matches the drainage report basin map and the civil plans. [drainage report, pg 128]
Correction 132:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Revise storm pipe discharger per collection's department comment. [civils, sheet C5.0]
Correction 133:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide Vault Volume. [civils, sheet C5.2]
Correction 134:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Duplicate detail can be removed. Was this meant to be city standard 02.01.02 catch basin type 1 area drain? [civils, sheet C5.7]
Correction 135:
See Document Markup
Comments:
For storm pipes crossing under sewer, 1.5' of vertical clearance is required per city design standard 204.4(8)
Correction 136:
See Document Markup
Comments:
How are the fuel pumps being connected to the underground storage tanks? No utility lines are shown on the plans. [civils, sheet C6.0]
Correction 137:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Remove water purveyor approval blocks, these are intended for projects being served by other water purveyors than the City of Puyallup. [civils, sheet C6.0]
Correction 138:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Include city standard detail 03.01.03-1 Water main crossing other utilities. [civils, sheet C6.4]
Correction 139:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Include city standard detail 06.01.01 Pipe trenching bedding and backfill. [civils, sheet C6.4]
Correction 140:
See Document Markup
Comments:
This sentence is discussing grease interceptor sizing rather than oil/water separator sizing. Revise accordingly. [civils, sheet C6.5]
Correction 141:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Correction 142:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide a downstream drainage map showing City of Puyallup and WSDOT infrastructure for on-site and off-site flows. The initial qualitative analysis shall extend along the flow path from the project site to the receiving water, for a distance up to one mile. If the receiving water is within one-quarter mile from the project site, the analysis shall extend within the receiving water to one-quarter mile from the project site. The analysis shall extend one-quarter mile beyond any improvements proposed as mitigation. The analysis must extend upstream from the project site to a point where there are no backwater effects created by the project, and the designer can determine all areas contributing run-on to the project [drainage report, pg 6]
Correction 143:
See Document Markup
Comments:
It appears that S Meridian flows into WSDOT's storm system, whereas the on-site runoff crosses SR 512 to the west to Clark's creek. Provide a downstream basin map and determine if these are two separate discharge basins, if so a bypass basin and flow control trade would not be warranted. [drainage report, pg 36]
Correction 144:
See Document Markup
Comments:
After further research, a catch basin should not be installed in this location. The west side of Meridian currently drains to WSDOT's storm drainage system which flows NE and flows along 512. Installing a catch basin in this location redirects runoff that went to WSDOT's infrastructure into the City of Puyallup and towards Clark's Creek. [civils, sheet C8.0]
Correction 145:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show WSDOT stormwater infrastructure. [civils, sheet C8.0]
Correction 146:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Send the plans over to WSDOT to review. Contact Sheena at Sheena.Pietzold@wsdot.wa.gov. [civils, sheet C8.0]
Correction 147:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide an analysis discussing the potential of two threshold discharge areas. After further research, the on-site and off-site area's appear to have separate discharge areas. The on-site project discharges across SR 512 to the west, whereas Meridian is collected by WSDOT's stormwater infrastructure and traverses NE along SR 512. If the project has two threshold discharge areas, the areas within Meridian do not need to be included in the flow control WWHM model. [drainage report, pg 22]
Correction 148:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Be sure this is slip resistant and ADA compliant. [civils, sheet C8.0]
Correction 149:
See Document Markup
Comments:
If the project has two threshold discharge areas, the project may want to rebuild this driveway section or grind and overlay as it is in rough shape. [civils, sheet C3.0]
Correction 150:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Revise flow control trade per separate TDA markup. [drainage report, pg 151]
Correction 151:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Make a note referencing that temporary erosion control measures are mitigated under clear, fill and grading permit PRGR20231482. [civils, sheet C3.0]
Correction 152:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide a detail from the proposed beehive grate. [civils, sheet C5.4]
Public Works Streets Review
Failed
02/15/2024
02/16/2024
Reviewer:
Corrections:
Correction 1:
See Document Markup
Comments:
block wall detail sheet C4.2 shows raised curb back of sidewalk, repeat question..why reversed slope? Civil C8.0 SH
Correction 2:
See Document Markup
Comments:
grind/overlay Sheet C8.0 SH
Correction 3:
See Document Markup
Comments:
If existing asphalt is to remain and be used for forms must be protected and have no concrete residue or staining on road when complete...
Sheet C8.2 SH
Correction 4:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Correction 5:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Correction 6:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Correction 7:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Correction 8:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Correction 9:
See Document Markup
Comments:
do not prefer/want permeable sidewalk.. C8 SH
Correction 10:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Install City Standard Street Light,,, C8 SH
Public Works Collection Review
Failed
02/15/2024
02/15/2024
Reviewer:
Corrections:
Correction 1:
See Document Markup
Comments:
The diameters of these pipes are incorrectly labeled on this sheet and may impact separation and depths of new storm pipes and structures. [civils, sheet C5.8]
Correction 2:
See Document Markup
Comments:
The collections division prefers that the stormwater from this proposed system discharges to the existing 30 inch storm pipe and not this manhole. This is the older of the two systems and it is unknown as to the full condition downstream. [civil resub, sheet 5.0]
Public Works Water Review
Failed
02/15/2024
02/14/2024
Reviewer:
Corrections:
Correction 1:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Sheet C6.0: Show 2-inch gate valves for 1.5-inch water services.
Correction 2:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Sheet C6.0: Poly pipe is susceptible to fuel spill leaching, and should not be used in fuel station sites. Copper water service lines are a safer option. Call out size and type of water service lines for both 1.5-inch services.
Correction 3:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Sheet C6.0: This existing fire hydrant is a 53-years old scissor stem hydrant, that is not to current City standards. Replace with new center stem hydrant with Storz fitting. Add City Standard detail 03.05.01 to this plan set.
Correction 4:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Sheet C6.0: Back flow assemblies should be the same size as the water service meter. Please call out size.
Correction 5:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Sheet C6.1: The water service line branch connection between the car wash and the Air/Water unit will likely be made using a tee. It should be shown that way. Consider adding a quarter turn ball valve in a valve box downstream of the service line tee to the Air/Water unit. That way the service line can be isolated if in need of repair, and the car wash can remain in use. Call out size and type of pipe to both locations.
Correction 6:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Sheet C8.2: This existing fire hydrant has been hit more than once due to turn radius issues with this traffic access entrance/exit. Now traffic on this access road will likely increase 20-fold. Concrete bollards cannot be used to protect the hydrant because they are not crash worthy and would create liability issues for the City. The hydrant needs to be relocated out of the potential large vehicle off tracking turn radius while providing a minimum 3-foot flat clear zone around the hydrant.
Correction 7:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Sheet L-1: No trees within 10-feet of utility easement.
Correction 8:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C8.2: This existing fire hydrant has been hit more than once due to turn radius issues with this traffic access entrance/exit. Now traffic on this access road will likely increase 20-fold. Concrete bollards cannot be used to protect the hydrant because they are not crash worthy and would create liability issues for the City. The hydrant needs to be relocated out of the potential large vehicle off tracking turn radius while providing a minimum 3-foot flat clear zone around the hydrant. This fire hydrant is currently placed behind the sidewalk, and it is located too close to the private access driveway that will allow every vehicle coming from northbound S Meridian, as well as any traffic from 15th Ave to access this proposed Arco fuel station / food mart. Just because the fuel tanker trucks that make deliveries to this development will not use this private access driveway does not mean that large vehicle traffic will not increase. Food delivery vehicles for the food mart will likely use this entrance, as well as private vehicles pulling trailers with recreational vehicles that want to fuel up at this development. We have high static water pressure on 15th Ave SW. If the fire hydrant gets hit and breaks the foot of the hydrant below ground, it could potentially take out one of the existing buildings or the access driveway itself, leaving your development without access from northbound S Meridian. If the existing sidewalk is wide enough to allow the fire hydrant to be relocated 15-feet to the east and placed behind the 15th Ave curb per City Standard detail 03.05.01 it should be back far enough to be safe from traffic off-tracking. Having the fire hydrant relocated, would allow the driveway approach radius to be widen and fortified to support the additional vehicle traffic.
Planning Review
Failed
02/15/2024
02/12/2024
Reviewer:
Corrections:
Correction 1:
Final Landscape Plan - Min Shrub Size
Comments:
All shrubs required shall be no smaller than two (2) gallon in size at the time of planting. Please include gallon size for shrubs on landscape plan set.
Correction 2:
Final Landscape Plan - Sight Distance Standards
Comments:
Updated comment: Please clearly show the sight distance triangle on the landscape plan set. It is currently labeled, but the triangle itself is not shown.
Sight Distance standards. Adjacent to public rights-of-way and points of access, no fences or landscape material at maturity, shall exceed three (3) feet above the local finish grade within a clear sight triangle. Please spec plants that meet this standard and, please show the sight distance area on the plans.
Correction 3:
Final Landscape Plan - Landscape Types
Comments:
The City's Vegetation Management Standards Manual (VMS) outlines specific treatment “types” that are required to be adhered to, dependent upon the yard area the landscaping is located within. See the VMS, sections 13 and 14 for full details. The VMS can be downloaded here: https://www.cityofpuyallup.org/puyallupvms
Correction 4:
Final Landscape Plan - Trash Containers
Comments:
All trash containers shall be screened from abutting properties and public rights-of-way by substantial sight-obscuring landscaping. Sight-obscuring fences and walls can be substituted for plant materials.
Correction 5:
Miscellaneous Planning Correction
Comments:
Updated comment: See updated sight distance comment. After including the sight distance triangle on the landscape plan set, please show pollinators in the areas outside the sight distance triangle.
Please see the condition of approval from the preliminary site plan (PLPSP20220079) below:
Due to the existing location of utilities where the proposed planter strip is, planning is allowing for the applicant to propose no trees in the planter strip. However, during the time of civils we will require that your landscape architect propose shrubbery along the entirety of the landscape strip while keeping in mind placement and shrub type in order to accommodate sight distance. We recommend planting native pollinator plants in this area. You can reference chapter 14 of Puyallup's VMS for shrub species that promote local biological diversity and provide benefit to pollinator species.
Please update landscape plan set to included shrubbery along the entirety of the landscape strip.
Correction 6:
Miscellaneous Planning Correction
Comments:
Please see the SEPA condition from the preliminary site plan (PLPSP20220079) below:
Pierce Transit is responsible for the closure and/or relocation of the bus stop along S Meridian St. while the sidewalk is being constructed. Pierce Transit is also responsible for the installation of the bus stop and bench once construction is complete and the concrete has cured.
The applicant is required to give Pierce Transit two (2) weeks notice prior to construction to allow them to remove the bus stop sign and bench.
The applicant is required to notify Pierce Transit when the construction is complete so they may arrange to have the bus stop reinstalled.
Correction 7:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
Please see the SEPA condition from the preliminary site plan (PLPSP20220079) below:
The Puyallup Tribe has requested a cultural resource survey prior to any ground disturbance. The project location is within a high probability area for impacting cultural resources including multiple known/recorded village sites.
The City of Puyallup has required the applicant to prepare an archaeological site investigation in accordance with state Department of Archaeology & Historic Preservation (DAHP) and Puyallup Tribal standards/guidelines prior to civil permit issuance.
Correction 8:
Final Landscape Plan - Daffodils
Comments:
Daffodils Required: The Puyallup area has a long history with daffodil bulb agricultural cultivation. To reflect that cultural heritage, daffodils shall be used in all perimeter yard areas. All perimeter landscape yard areas required by PMC 20.58 shall include Narcissus trumpet 'King Alfred' or ‘Dutch Master’ in the first 3’ of landscape areas behind the property line, planted at 6” on-center. Other groupings of Narcissus shall be used in groupings through landscape areas. A. Daffodil Bulbs may be interspersed throughout the perimeter landscape areas with standard landscaping shrubs/ground cover/trees, as required. B. Other varieties of Narcissus trumpet may be used, with the preference of 'King Alfred' or ‘Dutch Master’ in the frontage areas closest to any property line for visibility from the right of way. C. Daffodil bulb planting shall be completed at appropriate time of year to allow establishment (September – November). Applicants may be required to post an assignment to secure the installation at the appropriate time of year. Project landscape architect may spec an alternative time of year to plant, such as during the winter or very early spring.
Correction 9:
Final Landscape Plan - Street Tree Site Prep
Comments:
Section 12.3 (d) specifies minimum size and plant quality requirements. 1” DBH minimum for most new street trees. Integrate the Street Tree Installation Standards Table (page 25 of the VMS) into plan sets. Please observe required spacing standards, as outlined in the table, when preparing drawings.
The city has required species mix requirements based on the quantity of street trees to be planted as a part of the project. See section 12.6 of the VMS for more information. Some common species of street trees are prohibited due to overuse and other reasons. Please check section 12.11 when specifying species to be planted.
The city’s policy is to plant the largest canopy tree for the rooting/overhead space available (section 12.4, VMS). Please replace class I and class II trees in the planting schedule with class III & Class IV trees from the VMS since the landscape buffer widths can fit larger trees. Use your discretion for placement of class III & class IV trees based on landscape buffer width.
Correction 10:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
Please see the condition of approval from the preliminary site plan (PLPSP20220079) below:
Planning may accept landscaping as an alternative to the requirement for 60% transparency on the northern building façade under the condition that you provide a rendering of what the required landscaping will look like in approximately 3-5 years and as long as another option is chosen per PMC 20.26.300 (2.a).
PMC 20.26.300(ii) states: "Providing a landscaped strip at least 10 feet in width in front of the blank wall and planted with plant materials which will obscure or screen at least 50 percent of the blank wall within three years;"
Please reach out to me if you have questions regarding plantings.
Correction 11:
Add Submittal Item: Lot Combo
Comments:
Additional Submittal Item Required: Lot Combination Permit Application required. The civil cannot be issued until the lot combo is completed. Application form can be downloaded from the City website at https://www.cityofpuyallup.org/DocumentCenter/View/11646/Lot-Combination-Application
Correction 12:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
Per VMS Chapter 14.4 Type IV: Parking lot landscaping - Type IV Design Standards (J)
All internal landscape islands and connector strips shall include a double row (horizontally) of structural soil cells – often called “Silva Cells”, or equivalent - along the perimeter of all internal islands in parking stall areas only (under the pavement directly abutting the outer edge of the landscape island) to provide additional soil volume for tree growth. The landscape architect shall provide manufacturer’s installation details for internal parking lot landscaping soil installation, including required structural soil cells, on the final landscape plan set. See section 8.2 for soil quality standards.
Fire Review
Failed
02/15/2024
01/25/2024
Reviewer:
Corrections:
Correction 1:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
1. Provide auto-turn for review.
2. Provide fire lane No parking signage plan
3. Provide Stortz fitting on fire hydrant SW 048 on Meridian
Correction 2:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
1. Provide auto-turn for review. The auto-turn provided shows the vehicle running over the traffic device no matter what direct performed. This creates an obstacle for the fire apparatus and will not be approved. If this is a mountable island provide full details and profile views. Curbing and radiuses will need to be adjusted where the auto-turn shows over run.
2. Provide fire lane No parking signage plan, I do not see where the stripping and curb paint is listed per the PMC. The signs are shown but paint is required.
3. Provide Stortz fitting on fire hydrant SW 048 on Meridian. I do not see a call out for the stortz fitting on the plans? Correction response letter states The hydrant is proposed to be replaced with a stortz fitting hydrant. Add City of Puyallup fire hydrant details to Civil plans and call out stortz fitting on water page.
Engineering Storm Review
VOID
02/15/2024
01/19/2024
Reviewer:
Engineering Traffic Review
Failed
12/12/2023
12/21/2023
Reviewer:
Corrections:
Correction 1:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
Meridian Driveway:
-Thermoplastic right arrow
-Outbound “RIGHT TURN ONLY” signage
-Private access easement should be modified to account for future SBR turn pocket radius + possible walls.
-“DO NOT ENTER” sign on north side of driveway facing SE to prevent inbound NBL turns.
-As stated in the preliminary site plan review, please include an updated sight distance analysis with next Civil submittal that identifies all sight obstructions. (Street tree placement, railing, guard rail, monument signage, fences, bus pad, etc.)
-Provide detailed dimensions for ramped/mountable edge of curb island. Provide paint details.
Streetlights
-City of Puyallup is actively coordinating with WSDOT to determine scope of necessary improvements. The existing WSDOT streetlights are located in City ROW and it’s unclear which jurisdiction owns and maintains lighting along this segment. The City will coordinate with the applicant once more information is known.
AutoTurn
-Need to see fuel truck and fire apparatus navigating driveway(s)
-Need to coordinate with David Drake (City Fire) if there are additional AutoTurn requirements for site circulation or access.
Frontage
-Along the Meridian frontage, evaluate ADA guidance to determine if railing is required behind the sidewalk.
-If grind/overlay is required, must provide a striping plan.
-Future SBR turn pocket – Is it possible to minimize utilities in planter strip make this future improvement easier?
-To verify ROW dedication and private easement modifications, designer needs to show SBR turn pocket design. Actual construction of SBR turn pocket is not required for this project.
-Bus Stop/Pad/Bench – City of Puyallup will coordinate with Pierce Transit to verify the proposed improvements will meet their requirements.
-City of Puyallup inspectors will verify ADA compliance at WSDOT ramp terminal
-Sidewalk transitions to ADA ramps (north & south) will require modification. See Sheet C6.0 & C6.1
Engineering Civil Review
Failed
12/12/2023
12/19/2023
Reviewer:
Corrections:
Correction 1:
See Document Markup
Comments:
See all review comments from clear, fill and grading permit PRGR20231482. [civils, sheet C2.0]
Correction 2:
See Document Markup
Comments:
See all review comments from clear, fill and grading permit PRGR20231482. [civils, sheet C2.1]
Correction 3:
See Document Markup
Comments:
See all review comments from clear, fill and grading permit PRGR20231482. [civils, sheet C2.2]
Correction 4:
See Document Markup
Comments:
See all review comments from clear, fill and grading permit PRGR20231482. [civils, sheet C2.3]
Correction 5:
See Document Markup
Comments:
During the next submittal, provide a draft right of way dedication form to review. The template form can be found here: chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.cityofpuyallup.org/DocumentCenter/View/7331/Appendix-C-?bidId= [civils, sheet C3.0]
Correction 6:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Revise to curb and gutter to collect and convey stormwater runoff. [site plan, pg 6]
Correction 7:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Is this swale really wrapping around the site or is this indended to be a walking path? [Sheet C3.0]
Correction 8:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide utility crossing information. [Sheet C5.0]
Correction 9:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Revise CB #6 to be a solid lid, bypassed stormwater shouldn't be collected after the treatment device. [civils, sheet C5.1]
Correction 10:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Duplicate/overlapped details. Revise accordingly. [civils, sheet C5.6]
Correction 11:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide a yard drain at the low-point of the landscape swale and connect to the storm system. [civils, Sheet C4.1]
Correction 12:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Revise this section of curb to be curb and gutter to convey stormwater to the proposed catch basins. Provide the gutter run slope [civils, sheet C5.]
Correction 13:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Connect the retaining wall drain to the private stormwater system. [civils, sheet C5.1]
Correction 14:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Revise to standard grate. [civils, sheet C6.0]
Correction 15:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide commercial sewer sampling tees per city standard 04.03.04 [civils, sheet C6.0]
Correction 16:
See Document Markup
Comments:
The grease interceptor will be installed per this civil plan set. Include city standards 04.06.01 and 04.06.02 and size the GI per puyallup municipal code 14.06. [civils, sheet C6.0]
Correction 17:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide the sampling box detail within the civil plan set. [civils, sheet C6.0]
Correction 18:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide pipe size and material for water service line. [civils, sheet C6.0]
Correction 19:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide pipe size and material for water service line. [civils, sheet C6.0]
Correction 20:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide pipe size and material for water service line. [civils, sheet C6.1]
Correction 21:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Why is the sidewalk being proposed to be installed at a reverse slope? [civils, sheet C8.0]
Correction 22:
See Document Markup
Comments:
The pierce county transit bench is blurry, provide an updated detail during the next submittal. [civils, sheet C8.3]
Correction 23:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Make a note to amend all disturbed soils per cs 01.02.08a [civils, sheet C2.1]
Correction 24:
See Document Markup
Comments:
City permit number is PRCCP20231423. [drainage report, pg 1]
Correction 25:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Revise preliminary note, this detail will be used for construction. [civils, sheet C5.6]
Correction 26:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Revise treatment flows to match. [civils, sheet C5.6]
Correction 27:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Revise detail overlapping. [civils, sheet C5.7]
Correction 28:
See Document Markup
Comments:
The predeveloped conditions within the WWHM calculation do not match existing conditions basin map on page 33. Revise accordingly. [drainage report, pg 54]
Correction 29:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Clarify that this is oil/water separator calculation for the overall site. [drainage report, pg 123 of 365]
Correction 30:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide a separate oil/water separator calculation for the fuel canopy ie Oldcastle 660-SA. [drainage report, pg 123 of 365]
Correction 31:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide the formula used to calculate the OWS plate area. [drainage report, pg 123 of 365]
Correction 32:
See Document Markup
Comments:
These two pipe runs will be underwater a majority of the year as the 30" storm main constantly flows with stormwater. Consider revising. [civils, sheet C5.8]
Correction 33:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Consider revising the sewer service from the trash enclosure to be parallel to the building (setback 10' from the building) and connect into the building's service line. [civils, pg C6.0]
Correction 34:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide the IE for the connection of the roof downspout to the detention system [civils, Sheet C5.0]
Correction 35:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Dimension the riser diameter. [civils, Sheet C5.5]
Correction 36:
See Document Markup
Comments:
To SDMH #3. [civils, sheet C5.5]
Correction 37:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Apply for seperate building permits for each of the underground storage tanks. [civils, Sheet C5.1]
Correction 38:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide the vault access riser detail within this plan set. [civils, Sheet C5.2]
Correction 39:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide a note stating the minimum reinforced concrete strength of the detention vault.The DOE manual specifies a minimum 3,000 psi. [civils, sheet C5.2]
Correction 40:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Apply for a separate building permit for the construction of the detention vault. [civils, sheet C5.2]
Correction 41:
See Document Markup
Comments:
What is this? [civils, Sheet C5.2]
Correction 42:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide area of the proposed vault. [civils, sheet C5.2]
Correction 43:
See Document Markup
Comments:
The vault section C-C is missing the vertical walls within the profile view. [civils, sheet C5.3]
Correction 44:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide a utility crossing table showing all utility IE's/ conflicts similar to what is provided to avoid potential conflicts during construction. [civils, sheet C6.0]
Correction 45:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Construction note 30 does not appears to be within this site plan depiction. Add the guardrail. [civils, Sheet C3.0]
Correction 46:
See Document Markup
Comments:
How is stormwater going to be captured/mitigated at the base of the proposed retaining wall to prevent surcharge on the wall? [civils, Sheet C5.1]
Correction 47:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide the running slope of the proposed gutter?
Correction 48:
See Document Markup
Comments:
These flows appear to be conveyed to CB #1 rather than CB #4. [drainage report, sheet 133 of 365]
Correction 49:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Revise the instances that refer to a separate grading permit to sheet C7.0 of this plan set. [civils, Sheet C5.4]
Correction 50:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide a narrative summarizing how the car wash reclaim is intended to work. [civils, sheet C6.3]
Correction 51:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Include city standard details 02.01.02 and 02.01.03. [civils, sheet C6.5]
Correction 52:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show a max 2% cross slope. [civils, Sheet C8.1]
Correction 53:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Make this a single sidewalk panel 15' in length to meet ADA compliancy rather than 2 panels. [civils, Sheet C8.1]
Correction 54:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Dimension the length of the landings. Revise to be 2% max run and cross-slopes to the maximum extent feasible. [civils, Sheet C8.1]
Correction 55:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide a 3' cross gutter per city standard 01.02.19. [civils, Sheet C8.1]
Correction 56:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Define exactly where this is on sheet C8.0. [civils, Sheet C8.1]
Correction 57:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Replace with city standard 01.01.05. [civils, Sheet C8.3]
Correction 58:
See Document Markup
Comments:
The beam guardrail detail states that curb is to be under the guardrail, revise accordingly. [civils, sheet C4.1]
Correction 59:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Why isn't the guardrail being extended further east to the point of highest elevation/slope. The end of the guardrail here creates a hazard. [civils, sheet C4.1]
Correction 60:
See Document Markup
Comments:
This detail has been updated, revise to standard plan C-20.10-06. [civils, sheet C7.3]
Correction 61:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Replace with updated WSDOT standard detail. [civils, sheet C7.3]
Correction 62:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Note: The roof is considered non-pollution generating and can be routed directly to the detention system if the yard drain is disconnected from the roof drains and re-routed. [drainage report, page 119 of 365.
Correction 63:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide a sizing calculation for the modular wetland unit. [drainage report, pg 119 of 365]
Correction 64:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide a detail for the proposed landscape swale. [civils, Sheet C4.1]
Correction 65:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show the car wash re-circulation lines. [civils, sheet C6.1]
Correction 66:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Revise to proposed oil water separator. [civils, sheet C6.7]
Correction 67:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Revise linetype from water to sewer. [civils, Sheet C6.]
Correction 68:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Revise slope to 2% towards planter. [civils, sheet C8.0]
Correction 69:
See Document Markup
Comments:
How deep will this irrigation line be? Ensure irrigation does not conflict with storm lines or treatment BMP on sheet C5.1 [Civils, L4]
Correction 70:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Indicate the trash enclosure dimension required per design standard 208. [civils, sheet C3.0]
Correction 71:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Include city standard 01.02.10 curb cut for the curb and gutter replacement within Meridian. [civils, sheet C8.3]
Correction 72:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide construction note and show required curb cut along the frontage for the curb and gutter replacement. [civils, sheet C8.]
Correction 73:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Install a catch basin to collect gutter runoff and connect to the perpendicular storm main. [civils, Sheet C8.0]
Public Works Collection Review
Failed
12/12/2023
12/12/2023
Reviewer:
Corrections:
Correction 1:
See Document Markup
Comments:
The diameters of these pipes are incorrectly labeled on this sheet and may impact separation and depths of new storm pipes and structures. [civils, sheet C5.8]
Public Works Streets Review
Failed
12/12/2023
12/11/2023
Reviewer:
Corrections:
Correction 1:
See Document Markup
Comments:
block wall detail sheet C4.2 shows raised curb back of sidewalk, repeat question..why reversed slope? Civil C8.0 SH
Correction 2:
See Document Markup
Comments:
grind/overlay Sheet C8.0 SH
Correction 3:
See Document Markup
Comments:
If existing asphalt is to remain and be used for forms must be protected and have no concrete residue or staining on road when complete...
Sheet C8.2 SH
Correction 4:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Correction 5:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Correction 6:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Correction 7:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Correction 8:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Planning Review
Failed
12/12/2023
12/11/2023
Reviewer:
Corrections:
Correction 1:
Final Landscape Plan - Min Shrub Size
Comments:
All shrubs required shall be no smaller than two (2) gallon in size at the time of planting. Please include gallon size for shrubs on landscape plan set.
Correction 2:
Final Landscape Plan - Sight Distance Standards
Comments:
Sight Distance standards. Adjacent to public rights-of-way and points of access, no fences or landscape material at maturity, shall exceed three (3) feet above the local finish grade within a clear sight triangle. Please spec plants that meet this standard and, please show the sight distance area on the plans.
Correction 3:
Final Landscape Plan - Landscape Types
Comments:
The City's Vegetation Management Standards Manual (VMS) outlines specific treatment “types” that are required to be adhered to, dependent upon the yard area the landscaping is located within. See the VMS, sections 13 and 14 for full details. The VMS can be downloaded here: https://www.cityofpuyallup.org/puyallupvms
Correction 4:
Final Landscape Plan - Trash Containers
Comments:
All trash containers shall be screened from abutting properties and public rights-of-way by substantial sight-obscuring landscaping. Sight-obscuring fences and walls can be substituted for plant materials.
Correction 5:
Miscellaneous Planning Correction
Comments:
Please see the condition of approval from the preliminary site plan (PLPSP20220079) below:
Due to the existing location of utilities where the proposed planter strip is, planning is allowing for the applicant to propose no trees in the planter strip. However, during the time of civils we will require that your landscape architect propose shrubbery along the entirety of the landscape strip while keeping in mind placement and shrub type in order to accommodate sight distance. We recommend planting native pollinator plants in this area. You can reference chapter 14 of Puyallup's VMS for shrub species that promote local biological diversity and provide benefit to pollinator species.
Please update landscape plan set to included shrubbery along the entirety of the landscape strip.
Correction 6:
Miscellaneous Planning Correction
Comments:
Please see the SEPA condition from the preliminary site plan (PLPSP20220079) below:
Pierce Transit is responsible for the closure and/or relocation of the bus stop along S Meridian St. while the sidewalk is being constructed. Pierce Transit is also responsible for the installation of the bus stop and bench once construction is complete and the concrete has cured.
The applicant is required to give Pierce Transit two (2) weeks notice prior to construction to allow them to remove the bus stop sign and bench.
The applicant is required to notify Pierce Transit when the construction is complete so they may arrange to have the bus stop reinstalled.
Correction 7:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
Please see the SEPA condition from the preliminary site plan (PLPSP20220079) below:
The Puyallup Tribe has requested a cultural resource survey prior to any ground disturbance. The project location is within a high probability area for impacting cultural resources including multiple known/recorded village sites.
The City of Puyallup has required the applicant to prepare an archaeological site investigation in accordance with state Department of Archaeology & Historic Preservation (DAHP) and Puyallup Tribal standards/guidelines prior to civil permit issuance.
Correction 8:
Final Landscape Plan - Daffodils
Comments:
Daffodils Required: The Puyallup area has a long history with daffodil bulb agricultural cultivation. To reflect that cultural heritage, daffodils shall be used in all perimeter yard areas. All perimeter landscape yard areas required by PMC 20.58 shall include Narcissus trumpet 'King Alfred' or ‘Dutch Master’ in the first 3’ of landscape areas behind the property line, planted at 6” on-center. Other groupings of Narcissus shall be used in groupings through landscape areas. A. Daffodil Bulbs may be interspersed throughout the perimeter landscape areas with standard landscaping shrubs/ground cover/trees, as required. B. Other varieties of Narcissus trumpet may be used, with the preference of 'King Alfred' or ‘Dutch Master’ in the frontage areas closest to any property line for visibility from the right of way. C. Daffodil bulb planting shall be completed at appropriate time of year to allow establishment (September – November). Applicants may be required to post an assignment to secure the installation at the appropriate time of year. Project landscape architect may spec an alternative time of year to plant, such as during the winter or very early spring.
Correction 9:
Final Landscape Plan - Street Tree Site Prep
Comments:
Section 12.3 (d) specifies minimum size and plant quality requirements. 1” DBH minimum for most new street trees. Integrate the Street Tree Installation Standards Table (page 25 of the VMS) into plan sets. Please observe required spacing standards, as outlined in the table, when preparing drawings.
The city has required species mix requirements based on the quantity of street trees to be planted as a part of the project. See section 12.6 of the VMS for more information. Some common species of street trees are prohibited due to overuse and other reasons. Please check section 12.11 when specifying species to be planted.
The city’s policy is to plant the largest canopy tree for the rooting/overhead space available (section 12.4, VMS). Please replace class I and class II trees in the planting schedule with class III & Class IV trees from the VMS since the landscape buffer widths can fit larger trees. Use your discretion for placement of class III & class IV trees based on landscape buffer width.
Correction 10:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
Please see the condition of approval from the preliminary site plan (PLPSP20220079) below:
Planning may accept landscaping as an alternative to the requirement for 60% transparency on the northern building façade under the condition that you provide a rendering of what the required landscaping will look like in approximately 3-5 years and as long as another option is chosen per PMC 20.26.300 (2.a).
PMC 20.26.300(ii) states: "Providing a landscaped strip at least 10 feet in width in front of the blank wall and planted with plant materials which will obscure or screen at least 50 percent of the blank wall within three years;"
Please reach out to me if you have questions regarding plantings.
Correction 11:
Add Submittal Item: Lot Combo
Comments:
Additional Submittal Item Required: Lot Combination Permit Application required. The civil cannot be issued until the lot combo is completed. Application form can be downloaded from the City website at https://www.cityofpuyallup.org/DocumentCenter/View/11646/Lot-Combination-Application
Correction 12:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
Per VMS Chapter 14.4 Type IV: Parking lot landscaping - Type IV Design Standards (J)
All internal landscape islands and connector strips shall include a double row (horizontally) of structural soil cells – often called “Silva Cells”, or equivalent - along the perimeter of all internal islands in parking stall areas only (under the pavement directly abutting the outer edge of the landscape island) to provide additional soil volume for tree growth. The landscape architect shall provide manufacturer’s installation details for internal parking lot landscaping soil installation, including required structural soil cells, on the final landscape plan set. See section 8.2 for soil quality standards.
Public Works Water Review
Failed
12/12/2023
12/08/2023
Reviewer:
Corrections:
Correction 1:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Sheet C6.0: Show 2-inch gate valves for 1.5-inch water services.
Correction 2:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Sheet C6.0: Poly pipe is susceptible to fuel spill leaching, and should not be used in fuel station sites. Copper water service lines are a safer option. Call out size and type of water service lines for both 1.5-inch services.
Correction 3:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Sheet C6.0: This existing fire hydrant is a 53-years old scissor stem hydrant, that is not to current City standards. Replace with new center stem hydrant with Storz fitting. Add City Standard detail 03.05.01 to this plan set.
Correction 4:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Sheet C6.0: Back flow assemblies should be the same size as the water service meter. Please call out size.
Correction 5:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Sheet C6.1: The water service line branch connection between the car wash and the Air/Water unit will likely be made using a tee. It should be shown that way. Consider adding a quarter turn ball valve in a valve box downstream of the service line tee to the Air/Water unit. That way the service line can be isolated if in need of repair, and the car wash can remain in use. Call out size and type of pipe to both locations.
Correction 6:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Sheet C8.2: This existing fire hydrant has been hit more than once due to turn radius issues with this traffic access entrance/exit. Now traffic on this access road will likely increase 20-fold. Concrete bollards cannot be used to protect the hydrant because they are not crash worthy and would create liability issues for the City. The hydrant needs to be relocated out of the potential large vehicle off tracking turn radius while providing a minimum 3-foot flat clear zone around the hydrant.
Correction 7:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Sheet L-1: No trees within 10-feet of utility easement.
Fire Review
Failed
12/12/2023
12/04/2023
Reviewer:
Corrections:
Correction 1:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
1. Provide auto-turn for review.
2. Provide fire lane / no parking signage plan
3. Provide Stortz fitting on fire hydrant SW 048 on Meridian
Engineering Storm Review
VOID
12/12/2023
10/09/2023
Reviewer: