| Review Type |
Outcome |
Est. Completion Date |
Completed |
|
Planning Review
|
Approved
|
06/10/2025
|
06/09/2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
Final Landscape Plan - Soil Req.
Add the following note to the landscape plan, “A minimum of eight (8) inches of top soil, containing ten percent dry weight in planting beds, and 5% organic matter content in turf areas, and a pH from 6.0 to 8.0 or matching the pH of the original undisturbed soil. The topsoil layer shall have a minimum depth of eight inches (8”) except where tree roots limit the depth of incorporation of amendments needed to meet the criteria. Subsoils below the topsoil layer should be scarified at least 6 inches with some incorporation of the upper material to avoid stratified layers, where feasible. Installation of the eight inches (8”) of top soil, as described above, shall generally be achieved by placing five inches (5”) of imported sandy-loam top soil into planned landscape areas (sub-base scarified four inches (4”)) with a three-inch (3”) layer of compost tilled into the entire depth.”
|
|
|
Final Landscape Plan - Soil Req. Cubic Yards
Please estimate the total top soil required to meet the 8 inch minimum soil standard for all landscaped areas in cubic yards. The contractor will be required to submit delivery sheets and demonstrate compliance with top soil required and specified on plans at the time of final inspection.
|
|
|
Final Landscape Plan - Mulch Req.
Add the following note to the civil plans, "All planting areas shall be mulched with a uniform four (4”) inch layer of organic compost mulch material or wood chips over a properly cleaned, amended and graded subsurface."
|
|
|
Final Landscape Plan - Sight Distance Standards
Sight Distance standards. Adjacent to public rights-of-way and points of access, no fences or landscape material at maturity, shall exceed three (3) feet above the local finish grade within a clear sight triangle. Please spec plants that meet this standard and, please show the sight distance area on the plans.
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
Landscape plan set should highlight retained trees, proposed trees, and trees proposed for removal based upon the associated arborist report.
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
Integrate the Street Tree Installation Standards Table (page 25 of the VMS) into landscape plan sets.
Please observe required spacing standards, as outlined in the table, when preparing drawings. The city has required species mix requirements based on the quantity of street trees to be planted as a part of the project.
See section 12.6 of the VMS for more information. Some common species of trees are prohibited due to overuse and other reasons. Please check section 12.11 when specifying species to be planted. The city’s policy is to plant the largest canopy tree for the rooting/overhead space available (section 12.4, VMS).
|
|
|
Final Landscape Plan - Street Tree Site Prep
Street tree soil requirements.
See section 8.2 of the VMS. Copy and paste the applicable section for street tree top soil and place on plans as requirement to meet the city standards. Root barriers, in accordance with city standards, are required for all street trees. A minimum of 8’ of linear protection along the edge of the sidewalk adjacent to the street tree shall be provided, using a minimum 24” deep root barrier panels. See city standards #01.02.07 and #01.02.03 for further details. Please be aware of the following standards in the VMS and Public Works Engineering and Construction Standards (found here: www.cityofpuyallup.org/1445/100---Roadway ) as they apply to street trees:
Integrate city standard detail 01.02.03 – root barrier detail.
Integrate city standard detail 01.02.07 – street tree planting detail.
Section 8.3 of the VMS requires (4”) of organic compost mulch or wood chips.
Integrate city standard detail 01.02.08a – soil amendment and depth.
NOTE: Top soil placement/installation specs, depth and quality standards can be found in section 8.2 of the VMS.
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
All internal landscape islands and connector strips shall include a double row (horizontally) of structural soil cells – often called “Silva Cells”, or equivalent - along the perimeter of all internal islands in parking stall areas only (under the pavement directly abutting the outer edge of the landscape island) to provide additional soil volume for tree growth. The landscape architect shall provide manufacturer’s installation details for internal parking lot landscaping soil installation, including required structural soil cells, on the final landscape plan set. See section 8.2 of VMS for soil quality standards.
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
The site plan, civil plans, landscape plans, and the bleacher application all show different site plans. The building square footage, landscaping, portables placement, proposed/existing parking, etc. are not consistent. Revise plans to ensure consistency between ALL documents associated with Cascade Christian and in all permit applications.
Parking needs to be accurate and consistent across ALL plan sets (CUP, Civil, Landscape plan set, Bleachers applications, etc.). These will all be reviewed for consistency.
|
|
Engineering Civil Review
|
Approved
|
06/10/2025
|
06/04/2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
Pursuant to PMC 21.10.230 and 21.10.260 the existing pond shall be inspected to verify that the original depth and design are still existing as designed. Should deficiencies be discovered, restoration of the existing storm system (which is to be utilized for the new run off based on an existing storm plan) to previous engineered conditions will be required.
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
On Page 14 (20/87) of the storm report under task 4 the report states that every single Site Constraint category is ‘not mapped’. Improve report and project knowledge by researching and defining areas of Site Constraints. Aquifer Recharge and Volcanic Hazard almost always apply
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
COST ESTIMATE: we will email a newly formatted version that is easier to use and print. We require that the off-site work, however minimal, is separated out so that we can calculate the amount of the Performance Bond for the sidewalk replacement. If the exact item is not pre-populated in the estimate sheet then include it under miscellaneous with a reasonable unit price.
a. Also, verify number of ADA ramps. It is difficult to determine from the plans if the sidewalks have curbs or not. Portions of the ADA path transition from established walkways to proposed crossings of drive aisles.
b. Remove Gravel Base, Top Course, and Class B Asphalt Concrete from ON SITE estimate. This private paving is not closely inspected by the city.
c. Cannot locate proposed 16 LF of 12” PVC on plans
d. Add Double Check Assembly to estimate. Specify size of assembly and water pipe on plans. If water pipe is less than 8 inches add under miscellaneous items and provide a reasonable unit price.
e. On Site Sewer: Add clean out. Side sewer LF is closer to 15 feet.
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
For the Operations and Maintenance Manual, the format and content are acceptable, but the BMPs shall be pulled from the City’s Stormwater Management Plan, Module 2 found here at this link: https://www.cityofpuyallup.org/2157/Operations-and-Maintenance . Include Appendix D: Annual Inspection Report. Include other Tables and Appendices from this page as needed.
|
|
Public Works Water Review
|
Approved
|
06/10/2025
|
05/29/2025
|
|
|
|
|
Fire Review
|
Approved
|
06/10/2025
|
05/29/2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
Conditional Use Permit PLCUP20240037 comments have not been addressed which will alter the Civil Plans. See below
1. Considering traffic is one way in one way out and not like a normal fire lane how will the traffic queuing work? We have to have full site access and can not have both lanes being blocked in one direction. There needs to be free flowing movement onsite. Dropoff and pickup need designated locations throughout the campus. The proposed site plan does not provide access to all structures with the known factor of traffic backing up.
2. Where the two portables are going in the South East corner, a plan was already decided by everyone that the parking island and stall needed to be removed because an Auto-turn could not be performed properly. Implement the previous agreement into this site plan for code compliance.
3. Provide a full auto-turn of the whole campus for review. Consideration needs to be taken for drop off and pickup areas. If the fire apparatus can not traverse the site with traffic it will not be accepted.
4. Provide a full fire lane dimensioned site plan. The new parallel parking on the southside of the gym looks to be encroaching into the fire lane.
5. Once approved, all fire lane / stripping / No parking signage will need to be maintained and updated throughout campus.
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
1. Auto-turn shows running over curbs in multiple areas. Remove the parking islands or shrink down to accommodate the fire apparatus.
2. Fire Lane width is required to be 26'.
3. Are the bleachers not being installed now? Parking is now encroaching into the fire lane. Is this one way now?
4. Complete prior corrections.
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
Notes are duplicated for the following permits: PRCNC20220578, PRCCP20241229, PRCCP20241229, PLCUP20240037
• All site plans under each submittal need to match.
• The Civil Plans PRCNC20220578 do not show the bleachers, they instead show parking stalls.
• The Civil Plans PRCNC20220578 do not show the two south portables on all pages.
• The Auto-turn does not work for the campus. Remove all parking islands and spaces that interrupt the turning radiuses per previous discussions.
• Fire lane widths vary from site plan to site plan. Provide accurate representation of all fire lane widths that reflect the same width on all permits and pages.
• Certain site plans show parrel parking on the southside of the gym (parrel with fire lane) and certain site plans do now show the parking.
• In order to approve any Civil plans, the C.U.P. traffic issues will need to be rectified to insure the internal circulation does not get affected.
|
|
Public Works Streets Review
|
Approved
|
06/10/2025
|
05/27/2025
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Traffic Review
|
Approved
|
06/10/2025
|
05/21/2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
Civil permit application cannot be considered for approval prior to CUP acceptance/approval. The outcome of the CUP approval may require modifications to this permit.
|
|
Public Works Collection Review
|
Approved
|
06/10/2025
|
05/19/2025
|
|
|
|
|
Planning Review
|
Failed
|
12/04/2024
|
12/17/2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Document Markup
If trees are to be retained, critical root protection zone (CRPZ) shall be established and shown on plans. clearing limits may not encroach on CRPZ. [Civil Plans, C2]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
|
|
|
See Document Markup
6' fence must be at 15' front setback line or further. [Landscape plans, L1]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Perimeter fencing permitted to be 3.5 feet in height within setback area (first 15'). [Civil Plans, C6]
|
|
|
Final Landscape Plan - Soil Req.
Add the following note to the landscape plan, “A minimum of eight (8) inches of top soil, containing ten percent dry weight in planting beds, and 5% organic matter content in turf areas, and a pH from 6.0 to 8.0 or matching the pH of the original undisturbed soil. The topsoil layer shall have a minimum depth of eight inches (8”) except where tree roots limit the depth of incorporation of amendments needed to meet the criteria. Subsoils below the topsoil layer should be scarified at least 6 inches with some incorporation of the upper material to avoid stratified layers, where feasible. Installation of the eight inches (8”) of top soil, as described above, shall generally be achieved by placing five inches (5”) of imported sandy-loam top soil into planned landscape areas (sub-base scarified four inches (4”)) with a three-inch (3”) layer of compost tilled into the entire depth.”
|
|
|
Final Landscape Plan - Soil Req. Cubic Yards
Please estimate the total top soil required to meet the 8 inch minimum soil standard for all landscaped areas in cubic yards. The contractor will be required to submit delivery sheets and demonstrate compliance with top soil required and specified on plans at the time of final inspection.
|
|
|
Final Landscape Plan - Mulch Req.
Add the following note to the civil plans, "All planting areas shall be mulched with a uniform four (4”) inch layer of organic compost mulch material or wood chips over a properly cleaned, amended and graded subsurface."
|
|
|
Final Landscape Plan - Sight Distance Standards
Sight Distance standards. Adjacent to public rights-of-way and points of access, no fences or landscape material at maturity, shall exceed three (3) feet above the local finish grade within a clear sight triangle. Please spec plants that meet this standard and, please show the sight distance area on the plans.
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
Landscape plan set should highlight retained trees, proposed trees, and trees proposed for removal based upon the associated arborist report.
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
Integrate the Street Tree Installation Standards Table (page 25 of the VMS) into landscape plan sets.
Please observe required spacing standards, as outlined in the table, when preparing drawings. The city has required species mix requirements based on the quantity of street trees to be planted as a part of the project.
See section 12.6 of the VMS for more information. Some common species of trees are prohibited due to overuse and other reasons. Please check section 12.11 when specifying species to be planted. The city’s policy is to plant the largest canopy tree for the rooting/overhead space available (section 12.4, VMS).
|
|
|
Final Landscape Plan - Street Tree Site Prep
Street tree soil requirements.
See section 8.2 of the VMS. Copy and paste the applicable section for street tree top soil and place on plans as requirement to meet the city standards. Root barriers, in accordance with city standards, are required for all street trees. A minimum of 8’ of linear protection along the edge of the sidewalk adjacent to the street tree shall be provided, using a minimum 24” deep root barrier panels. See city standards #01.02.07 and #01.02.03 for further details. Please be aware of the following standards in the VMS and Public Works Engineering and Construction Standards (found here: www.cityofpuyallup.org/1445/100---Roadway ) as they apply to street trees:
Integrate city standard detail 01.02.03 – root barrier detail.
Integrate city standard detail 01.02.07 – street tree planting detail.
Section 8.3 of the VMS requires (4”) of organic compost mulch or wood chips.
Integrate city standard detail 01.02.08a – soil amendment and depth.
NOTE: Top soil placement/installation specs, depth and quality standards can be found in section 8.2 of the VMS.
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
All internal landscape islands and connector strips shall include a double row (horizontally) of structural soil cells – often called “Silva Cells”, or equivalent - along the perimeter of all internal islands in parking stall areas only (under the pavement directly abutting the outer edge of the landscape island) to provide additional soil volume for tree growth. The landscape architect shall provide manufacturer’s installation details for internal parking lot landscaping soil installation, including required structural soil cells, on the final landscape plan set. See section 8.2 of VMS for soil quality standards.
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
The site plan, civil plans, landscape plans, and the bleacher application all show different site plans. The building square footage, landscaping, portables placement, proposed/existing parking, etc. are not consistent. Revise plans to ensure consistency between ALL documents associated with Cascade Christian and in all permit applications.
Parking needs to be accurate and consistent across ALL plan sets (CUP, Civil, Landscape plan set, Bleachers applications, etc.). These will all be reviewed for consistency.
|
|
Engineering Traffic Review
|
Failed
|
12/04/2024
|
12/12/2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
Civil Plans, pg 9
Specified luminaire on City Street Lighting sheet is no longer in use.
Use the following: Leotek GCJ1 30J series head.
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
Civil permit application cannot be considered for approval prior to CUP acceptance/approval. The outcome of the CUP approval may require modifications to this permit.
|
|
Public Works Streets Review
|
Approved
|
12/04/2024
|
12/10/2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Document Markup
show roadway and sidewalk removal/restoration extents and detail SH
C2
|
|
|
See Document Markup
there is currently a PSE pole and mailboxes in this area, show street restoration if cut, where is the service cabinet? it should be placed to accommodate future sidewalk SH C6
|
|
Fire Review
|
Failed
|
12/04/2024
|
12/10/2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
Conditional Use Permit PLCUP20240037 comments have not been addressed which will alter the Civil Plans. See below
1. Considering traffic is one way in one way out and not like a normal fire lane how will the traffic queuing work? We have to have full site access and can not have both lanes being blocked in one direction. There needs to be free flowing movement onsite. Dropoff and pickup need designated locations throughout the campus. The proposed site plan does not provide access to all structures with the known factor of traffic backing up.
2. Where the two portables are going in the South East corner, a plan was already decided by everyone that the parking island and stall needed to be removed because an Auto-turn could not be performed properly. Implement the previous agreement into this site plan for code compliance.
3. Provide a full auto-turn of the whole campus for review. Consideration needs to be taken for drop off and pickup areas. If the fire apparatus can not traverse the site with traffic it will not be accepted.
4. Provide a full fire lane dimensioned site plan. The new parallel parking on the southside of the gym looks to be encroaching into the fire lane.
5. Once approved, all fire lane / stripping / No parking signage will need to be maintained and updated throughout campus.
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
1. Auto-turn shows running over curbs in multiple areas. Remove the parking islands or shrink down to accommodate the fire apparatus.
2. Fire Lane width is required to be 26'.
3. Are the bleachers not being installed now? Parking is now encroaching into the fire lane. Is this one way now?
4. Complete prior corrections.
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
Notes are duplicated for the following permits: PRCNC20220578, PRCCP20241229, PRCCP20241229, PLCUP20240037
• All site plans under each submittal need to match.
• The Civil Plans PRCNC20220578 do not show the bleachers, they instead show parking stalls.
• The Civil Plans PRCNC20220578 do not show the two south portables on all pages.
• The Auto-turn does not work for the campus. Remove all parking islands and spaces that interrupt the turning radiuses per previous discussions.
• Fire lane widths vary from site plan to site plan. Provide accurate representation of all fire lane widths that reflect the same width on all permits and pages.
• Certain site plans show parrel parking on the southside of the gym (parrel with fire lane) and certain site plans do now show the parking.
• In order to approve any Civil plans, the C.U.P. traffic issues will need to be rectified to insure the internal circulation does not get affected.
|
|
Engineering Civil Review
|
Failed
|
12/04/2024
|
12/06/2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
Previous corrections and previously reviewed and/or approved documents across multiple permits should all match. Clear, Fill and Grade Submittal items shall match design elements exactly in the Civil and Conditional Use Permit docs. Inconsistent direction and designs will result in longer review periods.
|
|
|
See Document Markup
The city wants this driveway eliminated and this correction was given and implemented on the Clear Fill and Grade Plans under permit PRGR20241060. Driveway shall be removed and standard curb, gutter and sidewalk to match existing shall be installed. [CIVIL PLANS, Sheet C2]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Are 2 transformers being installed? Show actual footprint of all utility structures. [CIVIL PLANS, Sheet C2]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Should this be here considering future swale construction? Is a construction entrance appropriate for such a developed site? Explore other locations/methods to control track out. [CIVIL PLANS, Sheet C2]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide rationale for removing 2 feet of curb here. What is the reference to C5 for? [CIVIL PLANS, Sheet C2]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
C4. [CIVIL PLANS, Sheet C4]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Include this detail in planset. [CIVIL PLANS, Sheet C6]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Make this note TYP. [CIVIL PLAN, Sheet C6]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
How is run off collected in this area? Is the 2' curb cut for drainage? [CIVIL PLANS, Sheet C6]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Correct leader placement. [CIVIL PLANS, Sheet C6]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
CB#2 to existing CB#5 only has a .05% (.0005ft/ft) slope. City Design Standard 204.3(6) requirs 0.5% minimum slope for Storm pipes. Check all slopes and revise. [CIVIL PLANS, Sheet C6]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Correct this reference. [CIVIL PLANS, Sheet C6]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Confirm number of ADA ramps required. Engineering Cost Breakdown Fee Calculation says 1. Elevations shown suggest that parking lot, proposed ADA walkways and new pad for portables are all at a close enough elevation to preclude the installation of ramps. [CIVIL PLANS, Sheet C6]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
What does this dotted hatching represent in the portable areas? [CIVIL PLANS, Sheet C6]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Confirm all elevations. Existing elevations don't match what is in our GIS (GIS contours show the parking area just south of the 6 portables as between 68 and 70 - is this datum conversion?) Finished grades at the corners of portables show up to 1.5 feet of grade difference. [CIVIL PLANS, Sheet C6]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Clarify the purpose of this note. [CIVIL PLANS, Sheet C6]
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
Civil Permits require a complete Stormwater Report. For this submittal reviewers only received an Operations & Maintenance Manual in the Stormwater Report submittal box. Both documents are required for civil permitting.
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Detail C on C7 calls out gravel. Clarify reference. [CIVIL PLANS, Sheet C6]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
This area is associated with the ADA parking space. Clarify where the temporary pickup/dropoff area is. Reserve striped area for ADA loading/unloading. [CIVIL PLANS, Sheet C6]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
What is the elevation difference between this curb and the asphalt? Is an ADA curb ramp needed here or anywhere else? It is difficult to tell from the plans which curbs are flush with the parking lot. [CIVIL PLANS, Sheet C6]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Update status of storm pipe. Protect inlet during construction if exposed. [CIVIL PLANS, Sheet C6]
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
Pursuant to PMC 21.10.230 and 21.10.260 the existing pond shall be inspected to verify that the original depth and design are still existing as designed. Should deficiencies be discovered, restoration of the existing storm system (which is to be utilized for the new run off based on an existing storm plan) to previous engineered conditions will be required.
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
On Page 14 (20/87) of the storm report under task 4 the report states that every single Site Constraint category is ‘not mapped’. Improve report and project knowledge by researching and defining areas of Site Constraints. Aquifer Recharge and Volcanic Hazard almost always apply
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
COST ESTIMATE: we will email a newly formatted version that is easier to use and print. We require that the off-site work, however minimal, is separated out so that we can calculate the amount of the Performance Bond for the sidewalk replacement. If the exact item is not pre-populated in the estimate sheet then include it under miscellaneous with a reasonable unit price.
a. Also, verify number of ADA ramps. It is difficult to determine from the plans if the sidewalks have curbs or not. Portions of the ADA path transition from established walkways to proposed crossings of drive aisles.
b. Remove Gravel Base, Top Course, and Class B Asphalt Concrete from ON SITE estimate. This private paving is not closely inspected by the city.
c. Cannot locate proposed 16 LF of 12” PVC on plans
d. Add Double Check Assembly to estimate. Specify size of assembly and water pipe on plans. If water pipe is less than 8 inches add under miscellaneous items and provide a reasonable unit price.
e. On Site Sewer: Add clean out. Side sewer LF is closer to 15 feet.
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
For the Operations and Maintenance Manual, the format and content are acceptable, but the BMPs shall be pulled from the City’s Stormwater Management Plan, Module 2 found here at this link: https://www.cityofpuyallup.org/2157/Operations-and-Maintenance . Include Appendix D: Annual Inspection Report. Include other Tables and Appendices from this page as needed.
|
|
Public Works Water Review
|
Approved
|
12/04/2024
|
12/03/2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Civil C6: Install 3/4" DCVA behind existing water meter. Add City Standard detail 03.04.01 to this plan set. Call out size and material of private water service line.
|
|
Public Works Collection Review
|
Approved
|
12/04/2024
|
11/15/2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Document Markup
It would be the recommendation of the collections division that a cleanout be installed on the sanitary service lateral. The lateral was found to be connected to the private 8 inch sanitary main. [Civil Plans, C6]
|
|
Planning Review
|
Failed
|
10/09/2024
|
10/11/2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Document Markup
If trees are to be retained, critical root protection zone (CRPZ) shall be established and shown on plans. clearing limits may not encroach on CRPZ. [Civil Plans, C2]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
|
|
|
See Document Markup
6' fence must be at 15' front setback line or further. [Landscape plans, L1]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Perimeter fencing permitted to be 3.5 feet in height within setback area (first 15'). [Civil Plans, C6]
|
|
Public Works Water Review
|
Failed
|
10/09/2024
|
10/10/2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Civil C6: Install 3/4" DCVA behind existing water meter. Add City Standard detail 03.04.01 to this plan set. Call out size and material of private water service line.
|
|
Public Works Streets Review
|
Failed
|
10/09/2024
|
10/09/2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Document Markup
show roadway and sidewalk removal/restoration extents and detail SH
C2
|
|
|
See Document Markup
there is currently a PSE pole and mailboxes in this area, show street restoration if cut, where is the service cabinet? it should be placed to accommodate future sidewalk SH C6
|
|
Engineering Traffic Review
|
Failed
|
10/09/2024
|
10/08/2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
Civil Plans, pg 9
Specified luminaire on City Street Lighting sheet is no longer in use.
Use the following: Leotek GCJ1 30J series head.
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
Civil permit application cannot be considered for approval prior to CUP acceptance/approval.
|
|
Engineering Civil Review
|
Failed
|
10/09/2024
|
10/07/2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
Previous corrections and previously reviewed and/or approved documents across multiple permits should all match. Clear, Fill and Grade Submittal items shall match design elements exactly in the Civil and Conditional Use Permit docs. Inconsistent direction and designs will result in longer review periods.
|
|
|
See Document Markup
The city wants this driveway eliminated and this correction was given and implemented on the Clear Fill and Grade Plans under permit PRGR20241060. Driveway shall be removed and standard curb, gutter and sidewalk to match existing shall be installed. [CIVIL PLANS, Sheet C2]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Are 2 transformers being installed? Show actual footprint of all utility structures. [CIVIL PLANS, Sheet C2]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Should this be here considering future swale construction? Is a construction entrance appropriate for such a developed site? Explore other locations/methods to control track out. [CIVIL PLANS, Sheet C2]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide rationale for removing 2 feet of curb here. What is the reference to C5 for? [CIVIL PLANS, Sheet C2]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
C4. [CIVIL PLANS, Sheet C4]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Include this detail in planset. [CIVIL PLANS, Sheet C6]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Make this note TYP. [CIVIL PLAN, Sheet C6]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
How is run off collected in this area? Is the 2' curb cut for drainage? [CIVIL PLANS, Sheet C6]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Correct leader placement. [CIVIL PLANS, Sheet C6]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
CB#2 to existing CB#5 only has a .05% (.0005ft/ft) slope. City Design Standard 204.3(6) requirs 0.5% minimum slope for Storm pipes. Check all slopes and revise. [CIVIL PLANS, Sheet C6]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Correct this reference. [CIVIL PLANS, Sheet C6]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Confirm number of ADA ramps required. Engineering Cost Breakdown Fee Calculation says 1. Elevations shown suggest that parking lot, proposed ADA walkways and new pad for portables are all at a close enough elevation to preclude the installation of ramps. [CIVIL PLANS, Sheet C6]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
What does this dotted hatching represent in the portable areas? [CIVIL PLANS, Sheet C6]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Confirm all elevations. Existing elevations don't match what is in our GIS (GIS contours show the parking area just south of the 6 portables as between 68 and 70 - is this datum conversion?) Finished grades at the corners of portables show up to 1.5 feet of grade difference. [CIVIL PLANS, Sheet C6]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Clarify the purpose of this note. [CIVIL PLANS, Sheet C6]
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
Civil Permits require a complete Stormwater Report. For this submittal reviewers only received an Operations & Maintenance Manual in the Stormwater Report submittal box. Both documents are required for civil permitting.
|
|
Fire Review
|
Failed
|
10/09/2024
|
09/30/2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
Conditional Use Permit PLCUP20240037 comments have not been addressed which will alter the Civil Plans. See below
1. Considering traffic is one way in one way out and not like a normal fire lane how will the traffic queuing work? We have to have full site access and can not have both lanes being blocked in one direction. There needs to be free flowing movement onsite. Dropoff and pickup need designated locations throughout the campus. The proposed site plan does not provide access to all structures with the known factor of traffic backing up.
2. Where the two portables are going in the South East corner, a plan was already decided by everyone that the parking island and stall needed to be removed because an Auto-turn could not be performed properly. Implement the previous agreement into this site plan for code compliance.
3. Provide a full auto-turn of the whole campus for review. Consideration needs to be taken for drop off and pickup areas. If the fire apparatus can not traverse the site with traffic it will not be accepted.
4. Provide a full fire lane dimensioned site plan. The new parallel parking on the southside of the gym looks to be encroaching into the fire lane.
5. Once approved, all fire lane / stripping / No parking signage will need to be maintained and updated throughout campus.
|
|
Public Works Collection Review
|
Failed
|
10/09/2024
|
09/16/2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Document Markup
It would be the recommendation of the collections division that a cleanout be installed on the sanitary service lateral. The lateral was found to be connected to the private 8 inch sanitary main. [Civil Plans, C6]
|
