| Review Type |
Outcome |
Est. Completion Date |
Completed |
|
Planning Review
|
Approved
|
10/30/2024
|
11/01/2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
Additional Submittal Item Required: Existing trees on the site which are larger than 15” in Diameter at Breast Height (DBH) are considered to be ‘significant trees’ and must be retained, where possible. If your site includes any significant trees, then you must include a tree risk assessment completed by a certified arborist. Any significant trees healthy enough to be retained in planned or required landscape areas should be retained and shown on the landscape plans. The arborist report should include a statement if it would be possible to retain any significant trees within the 30-foot buffer with the proposed rain garden. See Vegetation Management Standards Plan Page 19 for criteria for significant tree retention.
Updated 8/19/24: The arborist report and civil plan set identified five significant trees on-site that were proposed to remain. Please confirm that these trees have been retained during the recent grading work and provide a tree protection plan. If the trees have been removed, update the arborist report and civil plans to indicate their removal.
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
The clear and grading exceeds the 500 CYS cut/fill SEPA exemption. As such, SEPA review will be required. PLCUP20240037 includes SEPA review for the project and the city is unable to have two active SEPA reviews for the same project. Therefore, the project will need to be revised to include less than 500 CYS cut/fill or will need to wait for the PLCUP20240037 SEPA determination to be issued.
Updated 8/19/2024: The revised cut/fill amount still exceeds the SEPA exemption threshold. This permit is unable to be approved by Planning until the associated SEPA determination has been issued.
|
|
Engineering Civil Review
|
Approved
|
10/30/2024
|
10/29/2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Remove street light details. Confirm if new street lights are proposed for the civil submittal. City staff to review frontage requirements. [CLEAR, FILL & GRADE PLANS - RESUB, Sheet C9]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Are these areas being cleared under this permit? Include all clearing and paving totals in threshold determinations and project data. [CLEAR, FILL & GRADE PLANS - RESUB, Sheet C3]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Cap or remove existing storm pipe form active catch basin. [CLEAR, FILL &GRADE PLANS - RESUB, Sheet C2]
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
Update CSWPPP and plans with errata for updated fill totals. CESCL lead not identified in document. Provide contact information for CESCL.
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Curb cut must be eliminated. Show details of new curb, gutter, and sidewalk to replace defunct driveway under civil plans. [1060 PLAN SET, Sheet C2]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Are these the methods the contractor is going to use? We almost never see these types used. We commonly just see the inserts (witches hats). Include the actual storm barrier to be used (generic detail ok). [1060 PLAN SET, Sheet C3]
|
|
Engineering Traffic Review
|
Approved
|
10/30/2024
|
10/23/2024
|
|
|
|
|
Public Works Streets Review
|
VOID
|
10/30/2024
|
10/22/2024
|
|
|
|
|
Fire Review
|
Approved
|
10/30/2024
|
10/15/2024
|
|
|
|
|
Public Works Collection Review
|
Approved
|
10/30/2024
|
10/14/2024
|
|
|
|
|
Public Works Water Review
|
Approved
|
10/30/2024
|
10/10/2024
|
|
|
|
|
Planning Review
|
Failed
|
08/28/2024
|
08/19/2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
Additional Submittal Item Required: Existing trees on the site which are larger than 15” in Diameter at Breast Height (DBH) are considered to be ‘significant trees’ and must be retained, where possible. If your site includes any significant trees, then you must include a tree risk assessment completed by a certified arborist. Any significant trees healthy enough to be retained in planned or required landscape areas should be retained and shown on the landscape plans. The arborist report should include a statement if it would be possible to retain any significant trees within the 30-foot buffer with the proposed rain garden. See Vegetation Management Standards Plan Page 19 for criteria for significant tree retention.
Updated 8/19/24: The arborist report and civil plan set identified five significant trees on-site that were proposed to remain. Please confirm that these trees have been retained during the recent grading work and provide a tree protection plan. If the trees have been removed, update the arborist report and civil plans to indicate their removal.
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
The clear and grading exceeds the 500 CYS cut/fill SEPA exemption. As such, SEPA review will be required. PLCUP20240037 includes SEPA review for the project and the city is unable to have two active SEPA reviews for the same project. Therefore, the project will need to be revised to include less than 500 CYS cut/fill or will need to wait for the PLCUP20240037 SEPA determination to be issued.
Updated 8/19/2024: The revised cut/fill amount still exceeds the SEPA exemption threshold. This permit is unable to be approved by Planning until the associated SEPA determination has been issued.
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
Sheet C2: It isn't clear what the clearing limits are for if all the sidewalk, pavement, and curb will remain. if parking is removed as part of the grading permit, the number of parking spaces shall be provided elsewhere.
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
Sheet C2: Add notes that parking shall remain open for school use or describe the temporary impacts and mitigation.
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
|
|
Engineering Civil Review
|
Failed
|
08/28/2024
|
08/16/2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
See submittal requirements for this permit and PMC 21.14 for other requirements. Submit Estimate of Probable Cost, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (submitted SWPPP is acceptable, but extract SWPPP from Stormwater report and submit as stand alone document), Inadvertant Discovery Plan, Proof of Contractor's insurance, and DRAFT Clear, Fill and Grade bond. Once the total for the Estimate of Probable Cost is approved then the bond amount shall be that amount. The more complete and thorough the submittal of these docments, the quicker permit approval can happen. Many of these (contractor's insurance, IDP, SWPPP) can be used for the civil submittal as well, but will be required prior to work starting under this permit.
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
Remove all refences and design elements related to pervious parking or walkway areas. The site soils and variable ground water are known to be non-condusive to infiltration and the school's bio-swale and pond is adequately sized for the impervious expansion of these areas.
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
This site is very tight. Applicant should consider designating other areas of the campus for construction parking, equipment and material laydown and stockpile areas.
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Are these the methods the contractor is going to use? We almost never see these types used. We commonly just see the inserts (witches hats). Include the actual storm barrier to be used (generic detail ok). [1060 PLAN SET, Sheet C3]
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
Ensure that all plans and reports across the demo permit, the CUP, the civil permit, and the clear, fill and grade match and are consistent with each other. Remove extraneous reports and information (Track and Field improvements, old soils reports, etc.) for ease of review.
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Curb cut must be eliminated. Show details of new curb, gutter, and sidewalk to replace defunct driveway under civil plans. [1060 PLAN SET, Sheet C2]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Remove street light details. Confirm if new street lights are proposed for the civil submittal. City staff to review frontage requirements. [CLEAR, FILL & GRADE PLANS - RESUB, Sheet C9]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Are these areas being cleared under this permit? Include all clearing and paving totals in threshold determinations and project data. [CLEAR, FILL & GRADE PLANS - RESUB, Sheet C3]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Cap or remove existing storm pipe form active catch basin. [CLEAR, FILL &GRADE PLANS - RESUB, Sheet C2]
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
Update CSWPPP and plans with errata for updated fill totals. CESCL lead not identified in document. Provide contact information for CESCL.
|
|
Engineering Traffic Review
|
Approved
|
08/28/2024
|
08/09/2024
|
|
|
|
|
Public Works Water Review
|
VOID
|
08/28/2024
|
08/09/2024
|
|
|
|
|
Public Works Collection Review
|
VOID
|
08/28/2024
|
08/09/2024
|
|
|
|
|
Public Works Streets Review
|
VOID
|
08/28/2024
|
08/09/2024
|
|
|
|
|
Fire Review
|
Approved
|
08/28/2024
|
08/09/2024
|
|
|
|
|
Planning Review
|
Failed
|
08/16/2024
|
07/30/2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
Additional Submittal Item Required: Existing trees on the site which are larger than 15” in Diameter at Breast Height (DBH) are considered to be ‘significant trees’ and must be retained, where possible. If your site includes any significant trees, then you must include a tree risk assessment completed by a certified arborist. Any significant trees healthy enough to be retained in planned or required landscape areas should be retained and shown on the landscape plans. The arborist report should include a statement if it would be possible to retain any significant trees within the 30-foot buffer with the proposed rain garden. See Vegetation Management Standards Plan Page 19 for criteria for significant tree retention.
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
The clear and grading exceeds the 500 CYS cut/fill SEPA exemption. As such, SEPA review will be required. PLCUP20240037 includes SEPA review for the project and the city is unable to have two active SEPA reviews for the same project. Therefore, the project will need to be revised to include less than 500 CYS cut/fill or will need to wait for the PLCUP20240037 SEPA determination to be issued.
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
Sheet C2: It isn't clear what the clearing limits are for if all the sidewalk, pavement, and curb will remain. if parking is removed as part of the grading permit, the number of parking spaces shall be provided elsewhere.
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
Sheet C2: Add notes that parking shall remain open for school use or describe the temporary impacts and mitigation.
|
|
Public Works Water Review
|
Approved
|
08/16/2024
|
07/30/2024
|
|
|
|
|
Public Works Collection Review
|
Approved
|
08/16/2024
|
07/30/2024
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Civil Review
|
Failed
|
08/16/2024
|
07/26/2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
See submittal requirements for this permit and PMC 21.14 for other requirements. Submit Estimate of Probable Cost, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (submitted SWPPP is acceptable, but extract SWPPP from Stormwater report and submit as stand alone document), Inadvertant Discovery Plan, Proof of Contractor's insurance, and DRAFT Clear, Fill and Grade bond. Once the total for the Estimate of Probable Cost is approved then the bond amount shall be that amount. The more complete and thorough the submittal of these docments, the quicker permit approval can happen. Many of these (contractor's insurance, IDP, SWPPP) can be used for the civil submittal as well, but will be required prior to work starting under this permit.
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
Remove all refences and design elements related to pervious parking or walkway areas. The site soils and variable ground water are known to be non-condusive to infiltration and the school's bio-swale and pond is adequately sized for the impervious expansion of these areas.
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
This site is very tight. Applicant should consider designating other areas of the campus for construction parking, equipment and material laydown and stockpile areas.
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Are these the methods the contractor is going to use? We almost never see these types used. We commonly just see the inserts (witches hats). Include the actual storm barrier to be used (generic detail ok). [1060 PLAN SET, Sheet C3]
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
Ensure that all plans and reports across the demo permit, the CUP, the civil permit, and the clear, fill and grade match and are consistent with each other. Remove extraneous reports and information (Track and Field improvements, old soils reports, etc.) for ease of review.
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Curb cut must be eliminated. Show details of new curb, gutter, and sidewalk to replace defunct driveway under civil plans. [1060 PLAN SET, Sheet C2]
|
|
Engineering Traffic Review
|
Approved
|
08/16/2024
|
07/26/2024
|
|
|
|
|
Fire Review
|
Approved
|
08/16/2024
|
07/26/2024
|
|
|
|
|
Public Works Streets Review
|
VOID
|
08/16/2024
|
07/24/2024
|
|
|
|