Review Type |
Outcome |
Est. Completion Date |
Completed |
Engineering Traffic Review
|
Approved
|
05/28/2025
|
05/07/2025
|
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
Per Traffic Scoping Document, submitted for permit E-21-0071:
Trips calculated using ITE LUC 180 “Specialty Trade Contractor”
Building area calculated for TIF is 4,774 sqft (2,602 + 300 + 1,872)
PM peak trips will be 8.3 ((4.774*1.93 = 9.2) – 0.9) * $4500 = $37,350 traffic impact fee
Is a building permit/TI anticipated to accompany this civil permit? If Not, Traffic Impact fees will be required as a condition of permit approval, due to previous unpermitted work
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
Park Impact fees:
For ML zoning, Park impact fees are required. This will be $0.87 per sqft.
4,774 sqft * 0.87 = $4,153.88
|
Public Works Streets Review
|
Approved
|
05/28/2025
|
05/06/2025
|
|
|
Public Works Water Review
|
Approved
|
05/28/2025
|
05/06/2025
|
|
|
Public Works Collection Review
|
Approved
|
05/28/2025
|
05/06/2025
|
|
|
Planning Review
|
Approved
|
03/28/2025
|
03/31/2025
|
|
|
Public Works Collection Review
|
Approved
|
03/28/2025
|
03/31/2025
|
|
|
Engineering Civil Review
|
Failed
|
03/28/2025
|
03/28/2025
|
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Attention to the provision in Detail 01.01.20 that specifies no longitudinal joints in wheel path.
|
|
See Document Markup
Refer this note and all other mentions of Grind and Overlay to Detail A, Sheet C4.
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide downturned elbow in new CB to minimize pollutants.
|
|
See Document Markup
Custom detail for off-site paving OK. See also WSDOT Spec 5-04. These notes come directly from the city's "ROADWAY WIDENING" Detail 01.01.18. Although most of the notes are appropriate, it should be known that Note #1 refers to the minimum 36 inch asphalt widening from existing asphalt to curb. It should refer the contractor to Detail 01.01.20 #6 where it prohibits longitudinal joints in the wheel path or be removed. Alternatively, include Detail 01.01.19 instead and specify a 4 inch top layer.
|
|
See Document Markup
Include note that says: 'Gutter edge must be tack sealed with AR4000'.
|
|
See Document Markup
Refer the contractor to Detail 03.01.03-1.
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
- Technically the frontage and the proposed road repair (OFF SITE) exceeds 2,000 square feet and could require SW Management (List #1 or LID standard - Min Req #5). A suggestion would be to use BMP T5.18 – Reverse Slope Sidewalk to mitigate the walking area. The required 10 foot vegetated area behind the sidewalk is already proposed in your design. This would leave the replaced area in the ROW under 2,000 square feet (~1640 sq ft) as proposed. Considering the desperate need for improvement of this area, the city will not require SW Management (Min Req #5) should the area of full depth improvement be enlarged during construction due to the inability to achieve grind and overlay in all areas.
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
DRAINAGE REPORT
- Page 1 refers to the 2014 manual. Puyallup usues the 2019 Manual curently.
-This project triggers the requirement for a CGSWP issued by Ecology.
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
PERVIOUS CONCRETE PAVEMENT DESIGN MEMO:
-Memo says pervious concrete and civil plans call for permeable asphalt. Verify material and make consistent across all documents.
-Memo recommends 8 inch pervious pavement section with 7.5 inches of CSTC. Civil plans show 6.5 inches of each. Report calls thicknesses recommendations but only refers to exceeding the recommended thicknesses based on engineering analysis, leading reviewers to interpret these thicknesses as a minimum. Provide recommended minimum thicknesses or sound engineering rationale for not taking the Geotechnical Engineer’s recommendation.
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
COST ESTIMATE OFF SITE:
-INCLUDE Roadway Excavation/Haul
-INCLUDE existing utilities to be brought to grade
-INCLUDE approx. 48 feet of new water pipe in ROW
-Double Check Valve Assembly line is provided under the WATER section for almost the same unit price as was provided in the MISCELLANEOUS section. Result is the same.
New version of cost estimate with better formatting available here: https://www.cityofpuyallup.org/1591/Master-Document-List
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
COST ESTIMATE ON SITE:
-We would usually instruct designers to REMOVE GRAVEL BASE, TOP COURSE, and ASPHALT from estimate. Inspector will not focus on private paving areas except that the performance of the Pervious Lot impacts the city in case of failure. Move totals to MISC section and indicate that they are for the pervious lot by labeling each section to correspond with the layers of the pervious lot.
b. INCLUDE No Parking Signs under STREET section
c. INCLUDE lineal feet of curb under STREET section
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE MANUAL - use the relevant portions of the city’s new page (https://www.cityofpuyallup.org/2157/Operations-and-Maintenance) to populate the sections of the O&M Manual. Retain the project description. The Site Address, Parcel Number and Ownership are all incorrect. Check the remainder of the manual for accuracy and be sure totals match the most current plans and drainage report.
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
SWPPP - include CESCL and contact info or blank space to fill in CESCL and contact info.
|
Engineering Traffic Review
|
Failed
|
03/28/2025
|
03/25/2025
|
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
Per Traffic Scoping Document, submitted for permit E-21-0071:
Trips calculated using ITE LUC 180 “Specialty Trade Contractor”
Building area calculated for TIF is 4,774 sqft (2,602 + 300 + 1,872)
PM peak trips will be 8.3 ((4.774*1.93 = 9.2) – 0.9) * $4500 = $37,350 traffic impact fee
Is a building permit/TI anticipated to accompany this civil permit? If Not, Traffic Impact fees will be required as a condition of permit approval, due to previous unpermitted work
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
Park Impact fees:
For ML zoning, Park impact fees are required. This will be $0.87 per sqft.
4,774 sqft * 0.87 = $4,153.88
|
Public Works Water Review
|
Approved
|
03/28/2025
|
03/14/2025
|
|
|
Public Works Streets Review
|
Approved
|
03/28/2025
|
03/12/2025
|
|
|
Fire Review
|
Failed
|
03/28/2025
|
03/11/2025
|
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
1. On 3/11 I was contacted by Tom with Washington Underground who needed to add the fire line information on the Civils. The Civils are required to reflect this work and all underground will be reviewed under this permit.
|
Engineering Civil Review
|
Pending
|
05/28/2025
|
|
|
|
Fire Review
|
Pending
|
05/28/2025
|
|
|
|
Planning Review
|
Pending
|
05/28/2025
|
|
|
|