CITY OF PUYALLUP PERMITTING PORTAL

See Document Markup

Locate concrete washout 50 feet away from proposed and existing storm facilities. [Sheet C3, 20083 CIVIL SET, 2023_09_15 - RESUB]

Other/Miscellaneous

COST ESTIMATE - Include the OFF-SITE portion for the paving in the ROW. Also submit a pdf or screen shot of the grey box that calculates the inspection fee and required bond amount. On-site, off-site, and grey box all need to be submitted for review. Separate pdfs are acceptable, the sheet can be difficult to print. - Include retaining walls for pond - Include roadway excavation and haul for on and off site paving.

See Document Markup

Note still includes reference to liner. [CIVIL PLANS ONLY - RESUB, Sheet C3]

See Document Markup

Move note to correspond with new overflow location. [CIVIL PLANS ONLY-RESUB, Sheet C6]

See Document Markup

Provide permit number, status and name of reviewer. [CIVIL PLANS ONLY-RESUB, Sheet C8]

See Document Markup

Strike out this section and all other references to a liner for the pond. [Storm Drainage Report, 2023_12_22-RESUB, Page 94/96].

See Document Markup

Mitigated Routing model input says 334 feet by 28 feet. Clarify dimensions and make consistent across plans, reports and model. [Storm Drainage Report, 2023_12_22, Page 7/96]

See Document Markup

These two sections do not match. The City detail for a 36 foot public roadway shall be the target cross section, with the understanding that the road is in poor condition and that field adjustments or collaboration with the city may be required during construction. Remove the generic detail or clarify it's purpose. [CIVIL PLANS ONLY, Sheet C9]

See Document Markup

See Document Markup

See Document Markup

Civil Resub Sheet C6: Call out a 3/4-inch DCVA. Add City Standard detail 03.04.01 to the plan set.

See Document Markup

Civil Resub Sheet C6: Call out a 3/4-inch DCVA. Add City Standard detail 03.04.01 to the plan set.

See Document Markup

Locate concrete washout 50 feet away from proposed and existing storm facilities. [Sheet C3, 20083 CIVIL SET, 2023_09_15 - RESUB]

Other/Miscellaneous

COST ESTIMATE - Include the OFF-SITE portion for the paving in the ROW. Also submit a pdf or screen shot of the grey box that calculates the inspection fee and required bond amount. On-site, off-site, and grey box all need to be submitted for review. Separate pdfs are acceptable, the sheet can be difficult to print. - Include retaining walls for pond - Include roadway excavation and haul for on and off site paving.

See Document Markup

TESC Storm Drain Keynotes #1 and #2 not placed correctly. #2 points at an Inlet Protection symbol. Remove/relocate symbol and correct leaders. [CIVIL PLANS ONLY-RESUB, Sheet C3]

See Document Markup

Note still includes reference to liner. [CIVIL PLANS ONLY - RESUB, Sheet C3]

See Document Markup

Demo Key-Note #5 not included in notes. [CIVIL PLANS ONLY-RESUB, Sheet C3]

See Document Markup

Remove errant detail bubble. [CIVIL PLANS ONLY-RESUB, Sheet C3]

See Document Markup

Move note to correspond with new overflow location. [CIVIL PLANS ONLY-RESUB, Sheet C6]

See Document Markup

Provide permit number, status and name of reviewer. [CIVIL PLANS ONLY-RESUB, Sheet C8]

See Document Markup

Strike out this section and all other references to a liner for the pond. [Storm Drainage Report, 2023_12_22-RESUB, Page 94/96].

See Document Markup

Mitigated Routing model input says 334 feet by 28 feet. Clarify dimensions and make consistent across plans, reports and model. [Storm Drainage Report, 2023_12_22, Page 7/96]

See Document Markup

These two sections do not match. The City detail for a 36 foot public roadway shall be the target cross section, with the understanding that the road is in poor condition and that field adjustments or collaboration with the city may be required during construction. Remove the generic detail or clarify it's purpose. [CIVIL PLANS ONLY, Sheet C9]

See Document Markup

Replace lid and frame to meet current design standards. Adjust to new grade. [Sheet C7, CIVILS PLANS ONLY - RESUB]

Other/Miscellaneous

Provide City of Puyallup fire approval signature block on cover sheet and Sheet C6. Review engineer can provide.

Other/Miscellaneous

Provide Submittal Item: Engineering Cost Estimate Fee Calculation. Review engineer can provide template.

Other/Miscellaneous

Half-street improvements are required for this project. The improvements should coordinate with the half street improvements proposed by the other Pro-Vac/Best Parking Lot project across the street. Obvious benefits to budget and schedule exist in this coordination, and the finished product will be of higher quality if it can be accomplished as one pave. This benefits the City and the businesses and is required by code.

See Document Markup

Correct typo as indicated. [Sheet C3, 20083 CIVIL SET, 2023_09_15 - RESUB]

See Document Markup

Increase LOW to include the removal of this structure and associated appurtenances. This note and this work shall be shown and detailed throughout the project sheets and reports. Include demo detail (blow up) if necessary. [Sheet C3, 20083 CIVIL SET, 2023_09_15 - RESUB]

See Document Markup

Locate concrete washout 50 feet away from proposed and existing storm facilities. [Sheet C3, 20083 CIVIL SET, 2023_09_15 - RESUB]

See Document Markup

Found on C8. [Sheet C3, 20083 CIVIL SET, 2023_09_15 - RESUB]

See Document Markup

Drainage Report and Sheet C8 call out a bottom orifice opening of 0.7 inches. Reconcile. [Sheet C3, 20083 CIVIL SET, 2023_09_15 - RESUB]

See Document Markup

Found on C4. [Sheet C3, 20083 CIVIL SET, 2023_09_15 - RESUB]

See Document Markup

Not legible. Improve or remove. [Sheet C6, 20083 CIVIL SET, 2023_09_15 - RESUB]

See Document Markup

Correct leader placement. [Sheet C6, 20083 CIVIL SET, 2023_09_15 - RESUB]

See Document Markup

See BMP D.1 in the 2019 SWMMWW - overflows or spillways shall direct flows back into the downstream conveyance or other acceptable discharge point and spillway shall be armored extending downstream to where emergency overflows re-enter the conveyance system. The proposed design would introduce water onto the neighbors property and it is unclear where flows would end up. [Sheet C6, 20083 CIVIL SET, 2023_09_15 - RESUB]

See Document Markup

Provide trash rack for inlet into control structure. [Sheet C7, 20083 CIVIL SET, 2023_09_15 - RESUB]

See Document Markup

Will the landscape berm or bottom of fence be 3 feet above the edge of pavement? Confirm these elevations. [Sheet C7, 20083 CIVIL SET, 2023_09_15 - RESUB]

See Document Markup

Provide curbing around landscaped islands to provide drainage control and to protect the landscape from industrial practices and drive overs. [Sheet C7, 20083 CIVIL SET, 2023_09_15 - RESUB]

See Document Markup

Minimum pipe slope is 0.5%. See CoP Design Standards 204.3 (6). [Sheet C7, 20083 CIVIL SET, 2023_09_15 - RESUB]

See Document Markup

There are discrepansies between these details and the drainage report. Clarify where the 4.5 feet of ballast and the liner are to be located. Clarify how the top of liner can be at 62 and still be 0.5 feet above the GWE (reported at 62.2). Reconcile these details with Detention Pond Liner and Pavement Section Recommendations memo and Drainage Report. Revise all elevations to match. Clarify where liner to be located - label on this sheet points at bottom of ballast while Geotech report recommends lining the bottom of the pond (elevation 57). [Sheet C8, 20083 CIVIL SET, 2023_09_15 - RESUB]

See Document Markup

Proposed grades not calculated. [Sheet C8, 20083 CIVIL SET, 2023_09_15 - RESUB]

See Document Markup

WWHM model uses 18 inch riser. [Sheet C8, 20083 CIVIL SET, 2023_09_15 - RESUB]

See Document Markup

Provide detail on plans or remove reference. [Sheet C8, 20083 CIVIL SET, 2023_09_15 - RESUB]

See Document Markup

Elevation incorrect according to annotated flow control manhole detail on Sheet C8. [Page 7/104, 20083-Storm Drainage Report, 2023_09_17 - Resub]

See Document Markup

These 4 basins minus the landscape area add up to 1.21 acres and represent the asphalt areas. Sheet B2 reports the asphalt as 1.025 acres. Clarify. [Page 21/104, 20083-Storm Drainage Report, 2023_09_17 - RESUB]

See Document Markup

Asphalt Concrete Access Road for Pond detail on Sheet C8 only provides two inches of CRB. Justify the decision to go against Geotech recommendation. [Page 103/104, 20083-Storm Drainage Report, 2023_09_17 - RESUB]

Other/Miscellaneous

A condition of permitting will be the resolution of the ongoing stormwater contamination issue. Testing and reporting to the City's satisfaction will be required to issue the civil permit and to remove the plug that currently segregates the private system from the public. In addition to clean samples. FINDING THE SOURCE OF THE CONTAMINATION WILL ALSO BE REQUIRED AS A SEPA MITIGATION MEASURE. If the source cannot be located, then it has to be assumed that business practices are contributing and future operations may be limited or halted.

Other/Miscellaneous

COST ESTIMATE - Include the OFF-SITE portion for the paving in the ROW. Also submit a pdf or screen shot of the grey box that calculates the inspection fee and required bond amount. On-site, off-site, and grey box all need to be submitted for review. Separate pdfs are acceptable, the sheet can be difficult to print. - Include retaining walls for pond - Include roadway excavation and haul for on and off site paving.

See Document Markup

TESC Storm Drain Keynotes #1 and #2 not placed correctly. #2 points at an Inlet Protection symbol. Remove/relocate symbol and correct leaders. [CIVIL PLANS ONLY-RESUB, Sheet C3]

See Document Markup

Note still includes reference to liner. [CIVIL PLANS ONLY - RESUB, Sheet C3]

See Document Markup

Demo Key-Note #5 not included in notes. [CIVIL PLANS ONLY-RESUB, Sheet C3]

See Document Markup

Remove errant detail bubble. [CIVIL PLANS ONLY-RESUB, Sheet C3]

See Document Markup

Move note to correspond with new overflow location. [CIVIL PLANS ONLY-RESUB, Sheet C6]

See Document Markup

Provide permit number, status and name of reviewer. [CIVIL PLANS ONLY-RESUB, Sheet C8]

See Document Markup

Strike out this section and all other references to a liner for the pond. [Storm Drainage Report, 2023_12_22-RESUB, Page 94/96].

See Document Markup

Mitigated Routing model input says 334 feet by 28 feet. Clarify dimensions and make consistent across plans, reports and model. [Storm Drainage Report, 2023_12_22, Page 7/96]

See Document Markup

See Document Markup

See Document Markup

These two sections do not match. The City detail for a 36 foot public roadway shall be the target cross section, with the understanding that the road is in poor condition and that field adjustments or collaboration with the city may be required during construction. Remove the generic detail or clarify it's purpose. [CIVIL PLANS ONLY, Sheet C9]

See Document Markup

Replace lid and frame to meet current design standards. Adjust to new grade. [Sheet C7, CIVILS PLANS ONLY - RESUB]

Other/Miscellaneous

SEPA Mitigation Measures for associated SEPA permit #P-20-0015 are currently under review. Permit will not be issued unit SEPA determination, and all SEPA mitigation measures required for issuance have been fulfilled.

See Document Markup

Civil Resub Sheet C6: Call out a 3/4-inch DCVA. Add City Standard detail 03.04.01 to the plan set.

Other/Miscellaneous

The applicant needs to resubmit under the SEPA checklist to complete SEPA review prior to Planning approval of the civil permit. Please resubmit revised site plan and SEPA checklist updated to match current design to Permitcenter@puyallupwa.gov , Re: resubmittal P-20-0015.

Other/Miscellaneous

Planning staff supports Water Division request for a dedicated water filling site and will consider this issue under the SEPA review as a mitigation condition. The use of the hydrant (overflow spillage in the ROW) has also caused roadway damage and flooding conditions on properties to the north.

Miscellaneous Planning Correction

Report from city Water Division (Public Works) submitted to DPS shows non-conforming taps to on site hydrants that must be decommissioned prior to approval of permits for the site. Planning Division is placing the permit on hold until resolution is reached. March 15 map and report attached here. No further comments on landscape plan.

Other/Miscellaneous

SEPA Mitigation Measures for associated SEPA permit #P-20-0015 are currently under review. Permit will not be issued unit SEPA determination, and all SEPA mitigation measures required for issuance have been fulfilled.

See Document Markup

Sheet C6 of 10The Best Parking Lot Cleaning business requires filling the tanks of their mobile equipment with water on a daily basis. Removing the existing hydrant meter from the public fire hydrant on Inter Ave does nothing to solve the problem of having a reliable metered filling site for all their equipment. Removing this hydrant meter will just lead to their employees being forced to fill their equipment through an un-metered fire hydrant somewhere in our or possibly some other water system. It is well past time to install a permanent on-site water filling station. This would require a 3-inch water service protected by an above ground RPBA. See City Standard details 03.03.03 3"-4"-6" Water Service, and 03.04.03 3" and above Reduced Pressure Backflow Assembly for installation requirements.

See Document Markup

Sheet C6 of 10. The new 1-inch irrigation water service is shown on Sheet L5 of 7 on the landscape plans. It should be called out on this page. Add City Standard detail 03.03.01 3/4" or 1" Water Service Connection to this plan set.

See Document Markup

Sheet L2 of 7. 12-inch water main on Inter Ave should be potholed along the property limits to confirm that at least 10-feet separation is maintained between the water main and the proposed street trees.

See Document Markup

Sheet L5 of 7. The 1-inch irrigation metered service should be shown on Civil Site Plan Sheet C6 of 10

See Document Markup

Per Standard detail 01.03.13Install OM-3R sign here (facing west). Include this detail in the planset

See Document Markup

Begin "NO PARKING signage pointing east of driveway. Continue "NO PARKING" signage approximately 750ft east of here.

See Document Markup

Per standard detail 01.03.13 install taper to safely transition EB vehicles away from edge of roadway.

See Document Markup

Place "NO PARKING" signs along frontage ~750ft (2ft back from edge of roadway). Signs shall be placed per 01.04.05 (include detail in plan set)Show location and type of each sign. Per City Code, 34ft of improved roadway width to park vehicles on both sides of the street - PMC 10.36.050

See Document Markup

8.00 ft

See Document Markup

85.00 ft

See Document Markup

Other/Miscellaneous

The City recently (during this review) had phone calls and emails with Ivan Lisanets about water services on site. Find the email(s) attached to the document repository for this permit. The planning and the water review are pending the assertion (in writing) that a city approved water service will be proposed and constructed on the lot associated with this permit. This, and resolution of the other planning and water comments is what will be required to approve the review.

Other/Miscellaneous

Provide City of Puyallup fire approval signature block on cover sheet and Sheet C6. Review engineer can provide.

Other/Miscellaneous

Provide Submittal Item: Engineering Cost Estimate Fee Calculation. Review engineer can provide template.

Other/Miscellaneous

Half-street improvements are required for this project. The improvements should coordinate with the half street improvements proposed by the other Pro-Vac/Best Parking Lot project across the street. Obvious benefits to budget and schedule exist in this coordination, and the finished product will be of higher quality if it can be accomplished as one pave. This benefits the City and the businesses and is required by code.

See Document Markup

Correct typo as indicated. [Sheet C3, 20083 CIVIL SET, 2023_09_15 - RESUB]

See Document Markup

Increase LOW to include the removal of this structure and associated appurtenances. This note and this work shall be shown and detailed throughout the project sheets and reports. Include demo detail (blow up) if necessary. [Sheet C3, 20083 CIVIL SET, 2023_09_15 - RESUB]

See Document Markup

Locate concrete washout 50 feet away from proposed and existing storm facilities. [Sheet C3, 20083 CIVIL SET, 2023_09_15 - RESUB]

See Document Markup

Found on C8. [Sheet C3, 20083 CIVIL SET, 2023_09_15 - RESUB]

See Document Markup

Drainage Report and Sheet C8 call out a bottom orifice opening of 0.67 inches. Reconcile. [Sheet C3, 20083 CIVIL SET, 2023_09_15 - RESUB]

See Document Markup

Found on C4. [Sheet C3, 20083 CIVIL SET, 2023_09_15 - RESUB]

See Document Markup

Not legible. Improve or remove. [Sheet C6, 20083 CIVIL SET, 2023_09_15 - RESUB]

See Document Markup

Correct leader placement. [Sheet C6, 20083 CIVIL SET, 2023_09_15 - RESUB]

See Document Markup

See BMP D.1 in the 2019 SWMMWW - overflows or spillways shall direct flows back into the downstream conveyance or other acceptable discharge point and spillway shall be armored extending downstream to where emergency overflows re-enter the conveyance system. The proposed design would introduce water onto the neighbors property and it is unclear where flows would end up. [Sheet C6, 20083 CIVIL SET, 2023_09_15 - RESUB]

See Document Markup

Provide trash rack for inlet into control structure. [Sheet C7, 20083 CIVIL SET, 2023_09_15 - RESUB]

See Document Markup

Will the landscape berm or bottom of fence be 3 feet above the edge of pavement? Confirm these elevations. [Sheet C7, 20083 CIVIL SET, 2023_09_15 - RESUB]

See Document Markup

Provide curbing around landscaped islands to provide drainage control and to protect the landscape from industrial practices and drive overs. [Sheet C7, 20083 CIVIL SET, 2023_09_15 - RESUB]

See Document Markup

Minimum pipe slope is 0.5%. See CoP Design Standards 204.3 (6). [Sheet C7, 20083 CIVIL SET, 2023_09_15 - RESUB]

See Document Markup

There are discrepansies between these details and the drainage report. Clarify where the 4.5 feet of ballast and the liner are to be located. Clarify how the top of liner can be at 62 and still be 0.5 feet above the GWE (reported at 62.2). Reconcile these details with Detention Pond Liner and Pavement Section Recommendations memo and Drainage Report. Revise all elevations to match. Clarify where liner is to be located - label on this sheet points at bottom of ballast while Geotech report recommends lining the bottom of the pond (elevation 57). [Sheet C8, 20083 CIVIL SET, 2023_09_15 - RESUB]

See Document Markup

Proposed grades not calculated. [Sheet C8, 20083 CIVIL SET, 2023_09_15 - RESUB]

See Document Markup

WWHM model uses 18 inch riser. [Sheet C8, 20083 CIVIL SET, 2023_09_15 - RESUB]

See Document Markup

Provide detail on plans or remove reference. [Sheet C8, 20083 CIVIL SET, 2023_09_15 - RESUB]

See Document Markup

Elevation incorrect according to annotated flow control manhole detail on Sheet C8. [Page 7/104, 20083-Storm Drainage Report, 2023_09_17 - Resub]

See Document Markup

These 4 basins minus the landscape area add up to 1.21 acres and represent the asphalt areas. Sheet B2 reports the asphalt as 1.025 acres. Clarify. [Page 21/104, 20083-Storm Drainage Report, 2023_09_17 - RESUB]

See Document Markup

Asphalt Concrete Access Road for Pond detail on Sheet C8 only provides two inches of CRB. Justify the decision to go against Geotech recommendation. [Page 103/104, 20083-Storm Drainage Report, 2023_09_17 - RESUB]

Other/Miscellaneous

A condition of permitting will be the resolution of the ongoing stormwater contamination issue. Testing and reporting to the City's satisfaction will be required to issue the civil permit and to remove the plug that currently segregates the private system from the public. In addition to clean samples. FINDING THE SOURCE OF THE CONTAMINATION WILL ALSO BE REQUIRED AS A SEPA MITIGATION MEASURE. If the source cannot be located, then it has to be assumed that business practices are contributing and future operations may be limited or halted.

Other/Miscellaneous

Page 70 of Stormwater Site Plan (size the emergency overflow spillway) says Let H=0.5 but 0.3 is used in the calculation. If 0.5 is used a negative number results. Clarify.

See Document Markup

SHEET C3 - Using the future permanent detention facility as a temporary detention facility during construction could impact the condition through siltation or erosion. Permanent facilities shall be repaired and restored to the inspector's satisfaction prior to removing temporary ESC measures if damaged during construction.

See Document Markup

The Best Parking Lot Cleaning business requires filling the tanks of their mobile equipment with water on a daily basis. Removing the existing hydrant meter from the public fire hydrant on Inter Ave does nothing to solve the problem of having a reliable metered filling site for all their equipment. It is well past time to install a permanent on-site water filling station. This would require a 3-inch water service protected by an above ground RPBA. See City Standard details 03.03.03 3"-4"-6" Water Service, and 03.04.03 3" and above Reduced Pressure Backflow Assembly for installation requirements.

See Document Markup

SHEET C6 - Remove reference to Geotechnical Engineer recommendations for paving from Construction Callout 1 or revise Geotechnical Report to include recommendations.

See Document Markup

SD pipe sweeps/90's directly behind the existing structure. Verify by potholing and field correct.

See Document Markup

SHEET C9 - Flow control manhole detail describes TOR as 63.5 and the plan proposes a rim elevation of 63.88. Clarify or revise.

See Document Markup

SHEET C10 - Replace thicknesses in paving detail with thickness from C.O.P. cross section (City Detail 01.01.04) or replace detail with City Detail 01.01.04. Annotate City Detail to show that frontage and road width shall be as depicted on plans.

See Document Markup

Other/Miscellaneous

The City recently (during this review) had phone calls and emails with Ivan Lisanets about water services on site. Find the email(s) attached to the document repository for this permit. The planning and the water review are pending the assertion (in writing) that a city approved water service will be proposed and constructed on the lot associated with this permit. This, and resolution of the other planning and water comments is what will be required to approve the review.

Other/Miscellaneous

Sight distance analysis needs to be updated based on the future curb alignment across frontage. Future roadway width will be approximately 40ft wide, measure 14.5ft back from the future face of curb offset. Shift the proposed fence farther from Inter Ave to avoid conflicts ~5ft. Adjust street tree placement accordingly Swing gates must open toward site (not out to street) Verify Scale on landscaping plans Half-Street improvements – pavement section needs to be 01.01.04 (Commercial Collector)

See Document Markup

Per Standard detail 01.03.13Install OM-3R sign here (facing west). Include this detail in the planset

See Document Markup

Begin "NO PARKING signage pointing east of driveway. Continue "NO PARKING" signage approximately 750ft east of here.

See Document Markup

Per standard detail 01.03.13 install taper to safely transition EB vehicles away from edge of roadway.

See Document Markup

Place "NO PARKING" signs along frontage ~750ft (2ft back from edge of roadway). Signs shall be placed per 01.04.05 (include detail in plan set)Show location and type of each sign. Per City Code, 34ft of improved roadway width to park vehicles on both sides of the street - PMC 10.36.050

See Document Markup

8.00 ft

See Document Markup

85.00 ft

See Document Markup

Other/Miscellaneous

The applicant needs to resubmit under the SEPA checklist to complete SEPA review prior to Planning approval of the civil permit. Please resubmit revised site plan and SEPA checklist updated to match current design to Permitcenter@puyallupwa.gov , Re: resubmittal P-20-0015.

Other/Miscellaneous

Planning staff supports Water Division request for a dedicated water filling site and will consider this issue under the SEPA review as a mitigation condition. The use of the hydrant (overflow spillage in the ROW) has also caused roadway damage and flooding conditions on properties to the north.

Other/Miscellaneous

Adjust the tree planting plan to meet the 10’ requirements from the water department notes. This appears to require adjustment of the street tree location by 2.5’ to the south slightly.

Other/Miscellaneous

5. Intermix a large conifer tree species in with a large shade tree in the landscape islands, per city landscape islands requirements. 50% of the parking lot trees must be evergreen conifer 6. Please add solid lines and call outs on the landscape plan sheet indicating where the contractor is required to install root barrier panels. 7. Native plants of specific type are required in the storm pond per city design requirements. See below 8. Add a 6’ planted perimeter landscape buffer to the pond on the west side of the pond area.

Other/Miscellaneous

Storm pond landscaping standards must be adhered to: SLD-02 – Landscaping in storm water control facilities (Implementing standards - PMC 20.58.005 (3) code requirement). Landscaping of storm water ponds and other storm water control or treatment facilities (e.g. rain gardens, bio-swales, bio-filtration cells, etc.) shall be designed to use native and/or climate adaptable plant materials to provide 100% ground coverage and 75% visual coverage within five (5) years of installation. In order to reduce maintenance requirements, the use of turf lawn is prohibited in these areas, unless part of a water treatment structure (e.g. bio-swale) where grass is required by the project engineer for water quality treatment purposes. Ground covers shall be spaced at 18” intervals and shrubs at 3-5’ intervals, or as specified by the project landscape architect, to meet the 100% ground coverage and 75% visual coverage requirement within five (5) years. Groupings or clusters of native evergreen and native deciduous trees shall be integrated into the overall design. NW native shrubs and ground cover plant species that provide a native, wildflower-rich landscape area that utilizes native plant species that bloom in successive timeframes throughout the growing season shall be used in all storm pond areas. This is intended to promote local biological diversity and provide pockets of landscape area to benefit pollinator species. Selections from the following shrub species, in addition to other acceptable native plants the meet the criteria of providing blooming plants throughout the growing season, may be utilized to meet the SLD-02 requirements: 10. Early season (April/May): a. Osoberry (Oemlaria cerasiformis) b. Oregon grape (Mahonia aquifolium) c. Evergreen Huckleberry (Vaccinium ovatum) d. Red elderberry (Sambucus racemosa) 11. Early/Mid-season (May/June): a. Ninebark (Physocarpus capitatus) b. Twinberry (Lonicera involucrate) c. Red Flowering Currant (Ribes sanguineum) d. Snowberry (Symphoricarpos albus) 12. Mid-season (June/July): a. Nootka rose (Rosa nutkana) b. Mockorange (Philadelphus lewisii) c. Rugosa rose (Rosa rugose) 13. Late-season (August+): a. Douglas spirea (Spiraea douglassi) b. Oceanspray (Holodiscus discolor

Miscellaneous Planning Correction

Report from city Water Division (Public Works) submitted to DPS shows non-conforming taps to on site hydrants that must be decommissioned prior to approval of permits for the site. Planning Division is placing the permit on hold until resolution is reached. March 15 map and report attached here. No further comments on landscape plan.

Comment

need to do half street improvement across entire frontage...... remove / replace asphalt placed west of entering gate adjoining curb and gutter that surrounds catch basin ....asphalt is too high and does not allow water to flow into catch basin

Other/Miscellaneous

Would it make more sense for the frontage storm to be relocated now, based on the future curb line, rather than in the future when the landscaping would have to be completely removed

See Document Markup

Sheet C6 of 10The Best Parking Lot Cleaning business requires filling the tanks of their mobile equipment with water on a daily basis. Removing the existing hydrant meter from the public fire hydrant on Inter Ave does nothing to solve the problem of having a reliable metered filling site for all their equipment. Removing this hydrant meter will just lead to their employees being forced to fill their equipment through an un-metered fire hydrant somewhere in our or possibly some other water system. It is well past time to install a permanent on-site water filling station. This would require a 3-inch water service protected by an above ground RPBA. See City Standard details 03.03.03 3"-4"-6" Water Service, and 03.04.03 3" and above Reduced Pressure Backflow Assembly for installation requirements.

See Document Markup

Sheet C6 of 10. The new 1-inch irrigation water service is shown on Sheet L5 of 7 on the landscape plans. It should be called out on this page. Add City Standard detail 03.03.01 3/4" or 1" Water Service Connection to this plan set.

See Document Markup

Sheet L2 of 7. 12-inch water main on Inter Ave should be potholed along the property limits to confirm that at least 10-feet separation is maintained between the water main and the proposed street trees.

See Document Markup

Sheet L5 of 7. The 1-inch irrigation metered service should be shown on Civil Site Plan Sheet C6 of 10

Other/Miscellaneous

The applicant needs to resubmit under the SEPA checklist to complete SEPA review prior to Planning approval of the civil permit. Please resubmit revised site plan and SEPA checklist updated to match current design to Permitcenter@puyallupwa.gov , Re: resubmittal P-20-0015.

Other/Miscellaneous

Planning staff supports Water Division request for a dedicated water filling site and will consider this issue under the SEPA review as a mitigation condition. The use of the hydrant (overflow spillage in the ROW) has also caused roadway damage and flooding conditions on properties to the north.

Other/Miscellaneous

Adjust the tree planting plan to meet the 10’ requirements from the water department notes. This appears to require adjustment of the street tree location by 2.5’ to the south slightly.

Other/Miscellaneous

5. Intermix a large conifer tree species in with a large shade tree in the landscape islands, per city landscape islands requirements. 50% of the parking lot trees must be evergreen conifer 6. Please add solid lines and call outs on the landscape plan sheet indicating where the contractor is required to install root barrier panels. 7. Native plants of specific type are required in the storm pond per city design requirements. See below 8. Add a 6’ planted perimeter landscape buffer to the pond on the west side of the pond area.

Other/Miscellaneous

Storm pond landscaping standards must be adhered to: SLD-02 – Landscaping in storm water control facilities (Implementing standards - PMC 20.58.005 (3) code requirement). Landscaping of storm water ponds and other storm water control or treatment facilities (e.g. rain gardens, bio-swales, bio-filtration cells, etc.) shall be designed to use native and/or climate adaptable plant materials to provide 100% ground coverage and 75% visual coverage within five (5) years of installation. In order to reduce maintenance requirements, the use of turf lawn is prohibited in these areas, unless part of a water treatment structure (e.g. bio-swale) where grass is required by the project engineer for water quality treatment purposes. Ground covers shall be spaced at 18” intervals and shrubs at 3-5’ intervals, or as specified by the project landscape architect, to meet the 100% ground coverage and 75% visual coverage requirement within five (5) years. Groupings or clusters of native evergreen and native deciduous trees shall be integrated into the overall design. NW native shrubs and ground cover plant species that provide a native, wildflower-rich landscape area that utilizes native plant species that bloom in successive timeframes throughout the growing season shall be used in all storm pond areas. This is intended to promote local biological diversity and provide pockets of landscape area to benefit pollinator species. Selections from the following shrub species, in addition to other acceptable native plants the meet the criteria of providing blooming plants throughout the growing season, may be utilized to meet the SLD-02 requirements: 10. Early season (April/May): a. Osoberry (Oemlaria cerasiformis) b. Oregon grape (Mahonia aquifolium) c. Evergreen Huckleberry (Vaccinium ovatum) d. Red elderberry (Sambucus racemosa) 11. Early/Mid-season (May/June): a. Ninebark (Physocarpus capitatus) b. Twinberry (Lonicera involucrate) c. Red Flowering Currant (Ribes sanguineum) d. Snowberry (Symphoricarpos albus) 12. Mid-season (June/July): a. Nootka rose (Rosa nutkana) b. Mockorange (Philadelphus lewisii) c. Rugosa rose (Rosa rugose) 13. Late-season (August+): a. Douglas spirea (Spiraea douglassi) b. Oceanspray (Holodiscus discolor

Other/Miscellaneous

Page 70 of Stormwater Site Plan (size the emergency overflow spillway) says Let H=0.5 but 0.3 is used in the calculation. If 0.5 is used a negative number results. Clarify.

See Document Markup

SHEET C3 - Using the future permanent detention facility as a temporary detention facility during construction could impact the condition through siltation or erosion. Permanent facilities shall be repaired and restored to the inspector's satisfaction prior to removing temporary ESC measures if damaged during construction.

See Document Markup

The Best Parking Lot Cleaning business requires filling the tanks of their mobile equipment with water on a daily basis. Removing the existing hydrant meter from the public fire hydrant on Inter Ave does nothing to solve the problem of having a reliable metered filling site for all their equipment. It is well past time to install a permanent on-site water filling station. This would require a 3-inch water service protected by an above ground RPBA. See City Standard details 03.03.03 3"-4"-6" Water Service, and 03.04.03 3" and above Reduced Pressure Backflow Assembly for installation requirements.

See Document Markup

SHEET C6 - Remove reference to Geotechnical Engineer recommendations for paving from Construction Callout 1 or revise Geotechnical Report to include recommendations.

See Document Markup

SD pipe sweeps/90's directly behind the existing structure. Verify by potholing and field correct.

See Document Markup

SHEET C9 - Flow control manhole detail describes TOR as 63.5 and the plan proposes a rim elevation of 63.88. Clarify or revise.

See Document Markup

SHEET C10 - Replace thicknesses in paving detail with thickness from C.O.P. cross section (City Detail 01.01.04) or replace detail with City Detail 01.01.04. Annotate City Detail to show that frontage and road width shall be as depicted on plans.

See Document Markup

Other/Miscellaneous

Sight distance analysis needs to be updated based on the future curb alignment across frontage. Future roadway width will be approximately 40ft wide, measure 14.5ft back from the future face of curb offset. Shift the proposed fence farther from Inter Ave to avoid conflicts ~5ft. Adjust street tree placement accordingly Swing gates must open toward site (not out to street) Verify Scale on landscaping plans Half-Street improvements – pavement section needs to be 01.01.04 (Commercial Collector)