Review Type
Outcome
Est. Completion Date
Completed
Engineering Traffic Review
Revisions Required
04/11/2023
05/31/2023
Reviewer:
Corrections:
Correction 1:
See Document Markup
Comments:
1ft no access easement required along lot 1 & 2 frontage. 253.76ft
Correction 2:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Existing roundabout may require pedestrian improvements that may require larger easement
Correction 3:
See Document Markup
Comments:
City may require applicant to pursue pedestrian access to Pioneer Crossing. Peds are unlikely to walk all the way to the existing Shaw Rd traffic signal to enter the adjacent development.
Correction 4:
See Document Markup
Comments:
City may require applicant to provide on-site pedestrian access to 25th St SE. This may also include pedestrian improvements on 25th St SE.
Correction 5:
See Document Markup
Comments:
ROW dedication on 25th St SE
Correction 6:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Correction 7:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Existing roundabout may require pedestrian improvements that may require larger easement.
[Short Plat; Sheet 5]
Correction 8:
See Document Markup
Comments:
No details provided for 1ft no access easement required along lot 1 & 2 frontage. The length (253.76ft) and placement must be clearly identified on sheet 5 and described on sheet 2.
[Short Plat; Sheet 5]
Correction 9:
See Document Markup
Comments:
City may require applicant to pursue pedestrian access to Pioneer Crossing. Peds are unlikely to walk all the way to the existing Shaw Rd traffic signal to enter the adjacent development.
[Short Plat; Sheet 5]
Correction 10:
See Document Markup
Comments:
City will require applicant to provide on-site pedestrian access to 25th St SE. This improvement will include pedestrian enhancements on 25th St SE.
[Short Plat; Sheet 5]
Reviewer Comments:
Engineering Review
Revisions Required
04/11/2023
04/27/2023
Reviewer:
Corrections:
Correction 1:
See Document Markup
Comments:
In accordance with City codes and standards a proposed project must provide sufficient technical information to allow a finding that the proposed stormwater design is viable. The information contained in this storm report is insufficient for such a finding...see comments associated with Minimum Requirement 4, 7, and 8. In addition, the following specific comments outlined in the City's pre-application letter dated September 28, 2020 were not addressed:a) "The storm report indicates that a large portion of the site surface runoff is being redirected to discharge eastward into Shaw Road. However, Minimum Requirement 4 (MR4) requires the developed site to maintain existing drainage patterns and discharge at the natural location of the site. Based on the existing topographic contours, the natural discharge location for the parcel is at the NW corner of the project (not Shaw Road) which is also the Deer Creek stream corridor (a fish bearing water body). -Revise the preliminary stormwater design to comply with conditions described in MR4 or provide justification for releasing to Shaw Road. -Any documentation in support of changing the natural discharge location shall include appropriate environmental studies to ensure there are no adverse impacts to the stream corridor."b) "There are two Category IV wetlands on the existing parcel which do not appear to be addressed in the introductory storm report. At time of Preliminary Site Plan application, the applicant shall provide a preliminary analysis indicating that the proposed project will comply with Minimum Requirement 8 (MR8), Wetlands Protection."c) "The introductory storm report does not provide any information on how the project intends to comply with Minimum Requirement 7 (MR7), Flow Control. At the time of Preliminary Site Plan application, the applicant shall clarify the stormwater design approach and provide preliminary sizing calculations for any retention/detention facility(ies)." [Storm Report; Page 2]
Correction 2:
See Document Markup
Comments:
In accordance with City codes and standards a proposed project must provide sufficient technical information to allow a finding that the proposed stormwater design is viable. The information contained in this storm report is insufficient for such a finding...see comments associated with Minimum Requirement 4, 7, and 8. In addition, the following specific comments outlined in the City's pre-application letter dated September 28, 2020 were not addressed:
Correction 3:
See Document Markup
Comments:
a) "The storm report indicates that a large portion of the site surface runoff is being redirected to discharge eastward into Shaw Road. However, Minimum Requirement 4 (MR4) requires the developed site to maintain existing drainage patterns and discharge at the natural location of the site. Based on the existing topographic contours, the natural discharge location for the parcel is at the NW corner of the project (not Shaw Road) which is also the Deer Creek stream corridor (a fish bearing water body). -Revise the preliminary stormwater design to comply with conditions described in MR4 or provide justification for releasing to Shaw Road. -Any documentation in support of changing the natural discharge location shall include appropriate environmental studies to ensure there are no adverse impacts to the stream corridor."
Correction 4:
See Document Markup
Comments:
b) "There are two Category IV wetlands on the existing parcel which do not appear to be addressed in the introductory storm report. At time of Preliminary Site Plan application, the applicant shall provide a preliminary analysis indicating that the proposed project will comply with Minimum Requirement 8 (MR8), Wetlands Protection."
Correction 5:
See Document Markup
Comments:
c) "The introductory storm report does not provide any information on how the project intends to comply with Minimum Requirement 7 (MR7), Flow Control. At the time of Preliminary Site Plan application, the applicant shall clarify the stormwater design approach and provide preliminary sizing calculations for any retention/detention facility(ies)."
Correction 6:
See Document Markup
Comments:
[Storm Report; Page 2]
Correction 7:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add comment about the site being previously filled under permit E19-0156. [Storm Report; Section 1.0]
Correction 8:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Runoff must be released at the site's natural discharge location per Minimum Requirement 4. Per the storm report associated with Permit E19-0156, runoff flows from the SE corner of the site to the NW corner via sheet flow and an interceptor ditch along the north property line. [Storm Report; Section 1.0]
Correction 9:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Please include flow chart in this report. [Storm Report; Section 2.0]
Correction 10:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Revise...the predeveloped condition prior to recent fill activity was from east-to-west and must be maintained per MR4. If a portion of the site, prior to fill placement, actually discharged to the east, then the site should be analyzed as a split basin. [Storm Report; Section 2.0]
Correction 11:
See Document Markup
Comments:
There are two wetlands on the property which must be protected per Min. Reqt 8. Prior to short plat approval, provide commentary and supporting calculations on how this will be accomplished. [Storm Report; Section 2.0]
Correction 12:
See Document Markup
Comments:
a) Revise per MR4 comments and the fact that the site discharges to a regulated stream and regulated wetlands. b) Clarify if any runon from upstream (south) properties. c) At time of civil application, provide a more thorough analysis per City Std 201.2(2). [Storm Report; Section 3.0]
Correction 13:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Onsite Flow Control facilities req'd. [Storm Report; Section 2.0]
Correction 14:
See Document Markup
Comments:
See Min. Reqt 4 comments. [Storm Report; Section 2.0]
Correction 15:
See Document Markup
Comments:
This Master Plan indicates fill being placed within the regulated floodplain. Any development activity in the designated floodplain, including the placement of fill, shall comply with PMC 21.07 Flood Damage Protection, particularly the compensatory storage provisions. Quantify the amount of fill to be placed in the floodplain and identify the compensatory storage area, volume, and location. If the compensatory storage area is within the limits of the existing parcel, identify on the short plat document. If the compensatory storage area is outside the existing parcel, identify the parcel as well as the property owner, and record an easement or other document subject to City Attorney approval which will preserve the compensatory storage area in perpetuity. [Storm Report; Appendix A]
Correction 16:
See Document Markup
Comments:
These calculations only indicate undetained discharge to the offsite downstream system. Provide preliminary stormwater calculations that comply with MR7 and MR8 that would support a finding that the proposed stormwater design is viable and complies with the Ecology Manual.. [Storm Report; Appendix B]
Correction 17:
See Document Markup
Comments:
In accordance with City codes and standards a proposed project must provide sufficient technical information to allow a finding that the proposed stormwater design is viable. The information contained in this storm report is insufficient for such a finding...see comments associated with Minimum Requirement 4, 7, and 8. In addition, the following specific comments outlined in the City's Pre-Application letter dated September 28, 2020 were not addressed:
Correction 18:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add Application Number to Document (P-21-0142). [Plans; Sheet 1]
Correction 19:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Typo [Plans; Sheet 1]
Correction 20:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Replace with City Note 6 (or similar) to avoid having to record the Facilities Agreement prior to Short Plat approval. [Plans; Sheet 1]
Correction 21:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Typo [Plans; Sheet 1]
Correction 22:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Addressing shall be provided by EngineeringServices prior to short plat approval. [Plans; Sheet 1]
Correction 23:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add Application Number to Document (P-21-0142). [Plans; Sheet 2]
Correction 24:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Reference this item on the Short Plat document. [Plans; Sheet 2]
Correction 25:
See Document Markup
Comments:
1. No Building Permits will be issued for Lot 1 or Lot 2 until utility and road improvements to include curb, gutter, sidewalk, roadway base, pavement, water, sanitary sewer, storm infrastructure and street lighting are approved and permitted by Development Services Engineering for all street frontages.
Correction 26:
See Document Markup
Comments:
3. Portions of the site are located within a Special Flood Hazard Area as determined by the National Flood Insurance Program Community Panel Number 53053C0342E, dated March 7, 2017 and subsequent LOMR 18-10-0841P dated April 4, 2019. Development of the property shall adhere to the City's Floodplain Management Regulations contained in PMC Chapter 21.07.
Correction 27:
See Document Markup
Comments:
4. A preliminary storm drainage plan is on file for this short plat. No Building Permits will be issued for any lots of this short plat until a permanent storm drainage plan is approved and permitted by Development Services Engineering.
Correction 28:
See Document Markup
Comments:
2. Occupancy for Lot 1 or Lot 2 will not be approved until such time as the required utility and road improvements are constructed by the property owner and accepted by the City.
Correction 29:
See Document Markup
Comments:
5. The owner of Lots 1 through 2 shall record a Stormwater Management & BMP Facilities Agreement, on a form provided by the City, prior to final building permit approval and/or Occupancy.
Correction 30:
See Document Markup
Comments:
6. NOTICE: This short plat will contain a private storm drainage system. Private storm drainage systems are the sole responsibility of the owners, successors, and assignees for all lots being served by the private storm drainage system. Responsibility includes, but is not limited to, constructing, maintaining, repairing, and allowing City inspection of the private storm system in accordance with a separate recorded stormwater management facilities agreement to be filed with the Pierce County Auditor.
Correction 31:
See Document Markup
Comments:
7. No permanent structures(s) shall be erected within any public easement area(s). Permanent structure(s) shall mean any concrete foundation, concrete slab, wall, rockery, pond, stream, building, deck, overhanging structure, fill material, tree, recreational sport court, carport, shed, private utility, fence, or other site improvement that restricts or unreasonably interferes with the need to access or construct utilities in said easements(s). Permanent structure(s) shall not mean improvements such as flowers, ground cover and shrubs less than 3-feet in height, lawn grass, asphalt paving, gravel, or other similar site improvements that do not prevent the access of men, material, and machinery across, along, and within the said easement area. Land restoration within the said easement area due to construction, shall mean planting grass seed or grass sod, asphalt paving, or gravel unless otherwise determined by the City of Puyallup.8. This property is subject to Gravity Sewer Latecomer fee to be paid prior to building permit issuance for either Lot 1 or Lot 2. Reference AFN 2021107061306.
Correction 32:
See Document Markup
Comments:
1. No Building Permits will be issued for Lot 1 or Lot 2 until utility and road improvements to include curb, gutter, sidewalk, roadway base, pavement, water, sanitary sewer, storm infrastructure and street lighting are approved and permitted by Development Services Engineering for all street frontages.
Correction 33:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Indicate Private Street Maintenance Agreement AFN 201911270861 [Plans; Sheet 3]
Correction 34:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add Application Number to Document (P-21-0142). [Plans; Sheet 8]
Correction 35:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add: "AFN 9601180513" [Plans; Sheet 3]
Correction 36:
See Document Markup
Comments:
201210305003 [Plans; Sheet 3]
Correction 37:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add:AFN 200409085002 [Plans; Sheet 3]
Correction 38:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add Application Number to Document (P-21-0142). [Plans; Sheet 4]
Correction 39:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Revise to "Regulated Stream" [Plans; Sheet 4]
Correction 40:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Revise to "Regulated Stream" [Plans; Sheet 4]
Correction 41:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Revise to "Regulated Stream" [Plans; Sheet 4]
Correction 42:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add Application Number to Document (P-21-0142). [Plans; Sheet 5]
Correction 43:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Identify ROW [Plans; Sheet 5]
Correction 44:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Identify Property Line [Plans; Sheet 5]
Correction 45:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Franklin Puyallup, LLC per AFN 201705300235 [Plans; Sheet 5]
Correction 46:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout bearings and distances associated with easement area. [Plans; Sheet 6]
Correction 47:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add Application Number to Document (P-21-0142). [Plans; Sheet 6]
Correction 48:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Identify ROW [Plans; Sheet 6]
Correction 49:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Identify Property Line [Plans; Sheet 6]
Correction 50:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add Application Number to Document (P-21-0142). [Plans; Sheet 7]
Correction 51:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Identify ROW [Plans; Sheet 7]
Correction 52:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Identify Property Line [Plans; Sheet 7]
Correction 53:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add Application Number to Document (P-21-0142). [Plans; Sheet 8]
Correction 54:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout 10-ft ROW dedication [Plans; Sheet 8]
Correction 55:
See Document Markup
Comments:
201210305003 [Plans; Sheet 8]
Correction 56:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add: "AFN 9601180513" [Plans; Sheet 8]
Correction 57:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add:AFN 200409085002 [Plans; Sheet 8]
Correction 58:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify Callout...S01d06'52"W? [Plans; Sheet 8]
Correction 59:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Min. Reqt 8 applies. [Plans; Sheet 8]
Correction 60:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Min. Reqt 8 applies. [Plans; Sheet 8]
Correction 61:
See Document Markup
Comments:
The Master Plan shown in Appendix A of the preliminary storm report indicates fill being placed within the regulated floodplain. Any development activity in the designated floodplain, including the placement of fill, shall comply with PMC 21.07 Flood Damage Protection, particularly the compensatory storage provisions. Quantify the amount of fill to be placed in the floodplain and identify the compensatory storage area, volume, and location. If the compensatory storage area is within the limits of the existing parcel, identify on the short plat document. If the compensatory storage area is outside the existing parcel, identify the parcel as well as the property owner, and record an easement or other document subject to City Attorney approval which will preserve the compensatory storage area in perpetuity. [Plans; Sheet 8]
Correction 62:
See Document Markup
Comments:
2. Occupancy for Lot 1 or Lot 2 will not be approved until such time as the required utility and road improvements are constructed by the property owner and accepted by the City.
Correction 63:
See Document Markup
Comments:
3. Portions of the site are located within a Special Flood Hazard Area as determined by the National Flood Insurance Program Community Panel Number 53053C0342E, dated March 7, 2017 and subsequent LOMR 18-10-0841P dated April 4, 2019. Development of the property shall adhere to the City's Floodplain Management Regulations contained in PMC Chapter 21.07.
Correction 64:
See Document Markup
Comments:
4. A preliminary storm drainage plan is on file for this short plat. No Building Permits will be issued for any lots of this short plat until a permanent storm drainage plan is approved and permitted by Development Services Engineering.
Correction 65:
See Document Markup
Comments:
5. The owner of Lots 1 through 2 shall record a Stormwater Management & BMP Facilities Agreement, on a form provided by the City, prior to final building permit approval and/or Occupancy.
Correction 66:
See Document Markup
Comments:
6. NOTICE: This short plat will contain a private storm drainage system. Private storm drainage systems are the sole responsibility of the owners, successors, and assignees for all lots being served by the private storm drainage system. Responsibility includes, but is not limited to, constructing, maintaining, repairing, and allowing City inspection of the private storm system in accordance with a separate recorded stormwater management facilities agreement to be filed with the Pierce County Auditor.
Correction 67:
See Document Markup
Comments:
7. No permanent structures(s) shall be erected within any public easement area(s). Permanent structure(s) shall mean any concrete foundation, concrete slab, wall, rockery, pond, stream, building, deck, overhanging structure, fill material, tree, recreational sport court, carport, shed, private utility, fence, or other site improvement that restricts or unreasonably interferes with the need to access or construct utilities in said easements(s). Permanent structure(s) shall not mean improvements such as flowers, ground cover and shrubs less than 3-feet in height, lawn grass, asphalt paving, gravel, or other similar site improvements that do not prevent the access of men, material, and machinery across, along, and within the said easement area. Land restoration within the said easement area due to construction, shall mean planting grass seed or grass sod, asphalt paving, or gravel unless otherwise determined by the City of Puyallup.
Correction 68:
See Document Markup
Comments:
8. This property is subject to Gravity Sewer Latecomer fee to be paid prior to building permit issuance for either Lot 1 or Lot 2. Reference AFN 2021107061306. [Plans; Sheet 2]
Correction 69:
See Document Markup
Comments:
a) "The storm report indicates that a large portion of the site surface runoff is being redirected to discharge eastward into Shaw Road. However, Minimum Requirement 4 (MR4) requires the developed site to maintain existing drainage patterns and discharge at the natural location of the site. Based on the existing topographic contours, the natural discharge location for the parcel is at the NW corner of the project (not Shaw Road) which is also the Deer Creek stream corridor (a fish bearing water body). -Revise the preliminary stormwater design to comply with conditions described in MR4 or provide justification for releasing to Shaw Road. -Any documentation in support of changing the natural discharge location shall include appropriate environmental studies to ensure there are no adverse impacts to the stream corridor."
Correction 70:
See Document Markup
Comments:
b) "There are two Category IV wetlands on the existing parcel which do not appear to be addressed in the introductory storm report. At time of Preliminary Site Plan application, the applicant shall provide a preliminary analysis indicating that the proposed project will comply with Minimum Requirement 8 (MR8), Wetlands Protection."
Correction 71:
See Document Markup
Comments:
c) "The introductory storm report does not provide any information on how the project intends to comply with Minimum Requirement 7 (MR7), Flow Control. At the time of Preliminary Site Plan application, the applicant shall clarify the stormwater design approach and provide preliminary sizing calculations for any retention/detention facility(ies)." [Storm Report; Page 2]
Correction 72:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Short Plat
[Plans; Sheet 1 of 5]
Correction 73:
See Document Markup
Comments:
add the word "lots"
[Plans; Sheet 1 of 5]
Correction 74:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Typo...should read "are".
[Plans; Sheet 2 of 5]
Correction 75:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Delete...repeat of Note 1. Plans; Sheet 2 of 5]
Correction 76:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Typo...should read "202107061306".
[Plans; Sheet 2 of 5]
Correction 77:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add note:
This property is subject to a Sewer Lift Station Latecomer Agreement. Reference AFN 202108050859. In accordance with Section 4 of the Agreement, neither Lot 1 or Lot 2 are required to pay a latecomer fee associated with the constructed sewer lift station.
[Plans; Sheet 2 of 5]
Correction 78:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-should read "Lot 2".
[Plans; Sheet 2 of 5]
Correction 79:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-Missing Leader?
[Plans; Sheet 3 of 5]
Correction 80:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-201705300235
[Plans; Sheet 3 of 5]
Correction 81:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-bearing noted on ROS AFN 202003025002 indicates S01d06m37sW.
[Plans; Sheet 3 of 5]
Correction 82:
See Document Markup
Comments:
816 Shaw Road
[Plans; Sheet 5 of 5]
Correction 83:
See Document Markup
Comments:
808 Shaw Road
[Plans; Sheet 5 of 5]
Correction 84:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Delete "after flood"
[Plans; Sheet 5 of 5]
Correction 85:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-201705300235
[Plans; Sheet 5 of 5]
Correction 86:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Leader should intersect property corner. Also, it is difficult to see the dimensional leaders due to being placed on top of the easement hatching.
[Plans; Sheet 5 of 5]
Correction 87:
See Document Markup
Comments:
See comment Sht. 3 of 5.
[Plans; Sheet 5 of 5]
Correction 88:
See Document Markup
Comments:
The floodplain delineation noted on the LOMR dated April 4, 2019 is approximate and the actual limits of the floodplain shall be verified and delineated on the Short Plat using the FEMA determined flood profile, BFEs, and the existing topography of the project site. Revise accordingly.
[Plans; Sheet 5 of 5]
Correction 89:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide exhibits delineating: 1) the Preliminary Basin; 2) the Mitigated Basin areas; and 3) any undisturbed area with the acreage indicated.
[Storm Report; Page 5 of 272]
Correction 90:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add commentary that the site was temporarily filled for preload under Permit E19-0156.
[Storm Report; Page 5 of 272]
Correction 91:
See Document Markup
Comments:
The City has adopted the 2019 Ecology Manual (although this project can be considered vested to the 2014 Ecology Manual). NOTE: If the applicant elects to use the 2014 manual, MR8 will require matching the hydroperiod of the two Category IV wetlands onsite. However, the 2019 manual would not require this hydroperiod analysis although Section 1-C.2 and 1-C.3 would still apply.
[Storm Report; Page 6 of 272]
Correction 92:
See Document Markup
Comments:
To be reviewed at time of civil application. Please see comment on preliminary grading plan, Sht C-5, Page 25 of 272.
Correction 93:
See Document Markup
Comments:
The provided report in Appendix E is the biologist's "wetland assessment" and is not a compliant wetland-protection analysis meeting the requirements of MR8. It should be noted that this project is vested to the 2014 Ecology Manual, but the 2014 manual specifies Category IV wetlands must meet the hydroperiod protection requirements. However, the current city adopted 2019 Ecology Manual would not require the existing wetlands to be evaluated for hydroperiod protection due to the low habitat score and the fact the wetlands do not currently support endangered, threatened, or sensitive species or amphibians. NOTE: If the applicant elects to use the 2014 manual, then an MR8 hydroperiod analysis will be required prior to landuse approval to ensure the proposed project does not negatively affect the existing wetlands.
[Storm Report; Page 12 of 272]
Correction 94:
See Document Markup
Comments:
To be reviewed at time of civil application. Please see comment on preliminary grading plan, Sht C-5, Page 25 of 272.
Correction 95:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Clarify-2014 or 2019 Ecology Manual? (See comment associated with MR8).
[Storm Report; Pg 13 of 272]
Correction 96:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Clarify-2014 or 2019 Ecology Manual? (See comment associated with MR8).
[Storm Report; Pg 13 of 272]
Correction 97:
See Document Markup
Comments:
The floodplain delineation noted on the LOMR dated April 4, 2019 is approximate and the actual limits of the floodplain shall be verified using the FEMA determined flood profile, BFEs, and the existing topography of the project site. See additional comments on Sheet C-4, Page 24 of 272.
[Storm Report; Pg 13 of 272]
Correction 98:
See Document Markup
Comments:
The floodplain delineation noted on the LOMR dated April 4, 2019 is approximate and the actual limits of the floodplain shall be verified using the FEMA determined flood profile, BFEs, and the existing topography of the project site. Based on this preliminary grading plan and the existing topography (surveyed points), it appears that portions of the project will encroach into the floodplain triggering floodplain regulations. Revise site plan or clarify how the project proposes to comply with PMC 21.07, particularly the compensatory storage provisions PMC 21.07.060(f).
[Storm Report; Pg 24 of 272]
Correction 99:
See Document Markup
Comments:
The storm conveyance pipe is shown routed through the wetland which does not comply with Ecology Manual MR8 and the wetland General Protection requirements.
[Storm Report; Pg 24 of 272]
Correction 100:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Current code, PMC 21.06.910(4), indicates that Category IV wetlands are regulated, but the project is vested to prior code. However, stormwater regulations do regulate Category IV wetlands. See Ecology Manual MR8 requirements.
[Storm Report; Pg 175 of 272]
Correction 101:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Current code regulates Category IV wetlands. Add commentary that the project is vested to prior regulations. In addition, it should be clarified that Category IV wetlands are regulated per the City's stormwater regulations.
[Storm Report; Pg 178 of 272]
Correction 102:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-4.4?
[Storm Report; Pg 178 of 272]
Correction 103:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per the Ecology Stormwater Manual, Category IV wetlands are regulated. Revise accordingly.
[Storm Report; Pg 180 of 272]
Correction 104:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Current code, PMC 21.06.910(4), indicates that Category IV wetlands are regulated, but the project is vested to prior code. However, stormwater regulations do regulate Category IV wetlands. See Ecology Manual MR8 requirements.
[Critical Area Assessment; Pg 12 of 109]
Correction 105:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Current code regulates Category IV wetlands. Add commentary that the project is vested to prior regulations. In addition, it should be clarified that Category IV wetlands are regulated per the City's stormwater regulations.
[Critical Area Assessment; Pg 15 of 109]
Correction 106:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-4.4?
[Critical Area Assessment; Pg 15 of 109]
Correction 107:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per the Ecology Stormwater Manual, Category IV wetlands are regulated. Revise accordingly.
[Critical Area Assessment; Pg 17 of 109]
Reviewer Comments:
Planning Review
Revisions Required
04/11/2023
04/27/2023
Reviewer:
Corrections:
Correction 1:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
Street Trees. In order to further implementation of the city’s street tree program, street trees are required to be installed in all plats in accordance with Chapter 11.28 PMC, Street Trees. Proposed subdivisions under this title shall dedicate suitable area for street trees in accordance with city standards for the applicable roadway.
Correction 2:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
The following critical area notes need to be included on the face of the plat document: Lot 2 contains wetland areas and protective wetland buffers. A note shall be included on the face of the plat for each affected lot indicating: “This lot contains a wetland and/or wetland buffer that is protected by federal, state and local regulations. A wetland is a permanently, semi-permanently, or seasonally flooded area of land with a distinct ecosystem based on hydrology, hydric soils, and vegetation adapted for life in water saturated soils. Wetlands provide numerous benefits to the natural environment including water quality, flood control, wildlife habitat, shoreline stability, and aesthetic values. Since the 1780s, Washington has lost 31 percent of its wetland areas, from 1.35 million acres to 938,000 acres, contributing to loss of flood storage and habitat areas. Wetlands are critical to the overall health of watersheds and property owners are key for protecting, restoring, and managing our state's remaining wetland resources. Modification of land or vegetation and/or encroachment/conversion of these areas is strictly prohibited without prior government approval.”
Lot 2 contains a fish and wildlife conservation area. A note shall be included on the face of the plat for each affected lot indicating: “This lot contains a fish and wildlife habitat area that is protected by federal, state and local regulations. These areas serve a critical role in sustaining needed habitats and species for the functional integrity of the ecosystem, and which, if altered, may reduce the likelihood that the species will persist over the long term. Property owners are key for protecting, restoring, and managing our state's remaining habitat areas. Modification of land or vegetation and/or encroachment/conversion of these areas is strictly prohibited without prior government approval.”
Lot 2 contains a 100-year floodplain areas. A note shall be included on the face of the plat for each affected lot indicating: “This lot contains a 100-year floodplain areas, containing a 1% chance every year of flooding/inundation that could affect life, property, structures and improvements. All development and land modifications of floodplain areas requires city approval and consistency with the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP), the Endangered Species Act (ESA), critical areas ordinance (PMC 21.06) and flood protection ordinance (PMC 21.07), as well as any other applicable state, federal and local laws. Modification of land or vegetation, especially land filling that could reduce flood storage capacity, and/or encroachment/conversion of these areas is strictly prohibited without prior government approval.”
Lots 1 and 2 contain critical aquifer recharge areas. A critical aquifer recharge area note for each affected lot shall indicate: “The site is within a high susceptibility/critical aquifer recharge area. Uses and activities on this site shall comply with the city’s critical area ordinance (Puyallup Municipal Code 21.06, Article XI). Activities that do not cause degradation of ground water quality and will not adversely affect the recharging of the aquifer may be permitted in a critical aquifer recharge area and do not require preparation of a critical area report; provided, that they comply with the city storm water management regulations and other applicable local, state and federal regulations.”
Lots 1 and 2 contain a volcanic hazard area. A volcanic hazard area note for each lot affected shall indicate: “The site is within a volcanic hazard area. In the event of an eruption of Mt. Rainier, the site is expected to be inundated by pyroclastic flows, lava flows, debris avalanche, inundation by debris flows, lahars, mudflows, or related flooding resulting from volcanic activities. Uses and activities on this site shall comply with the city’s critical area ordinance (Puyallup Municipal Code 21.06, Article XII, section 21.06.1260, or succeeding section, regarding volcanic hazard areas.”
Correction 3:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
Vegetation buffers: a type II, 15-foot vegetative buffer shall apply to all arterial and collector roadways as designated in the comprehensive plan. Both Shaw Rd and 25th St SE meet this criteria, however since 25th St SE already includes a stream buffer, the 15-foot vegetative buffer will only be required at the Shaw road frontage. Buffers along city roadways shall include clumps of evergreen and deciduous trees intermixed with shrubs and no more than 25 percent turf grass;
When suitable natural vegetation is present, it shall be retained, and if necessary, enhanced with native plant material. Any proposed enhancement shall be set forth in a landscape plan, approved by the development services director or designee, and the landscaping installed prior to final plat approval; and
When suitable natural vegetation is not present, a landscape plan shall be prepared reflecting the use of native plant material, approved by the development services director or designee, and the landscaping installed prior to final plat approval. All native vegetation buffers shall be placed into either a native vegetation protection easement (NVPE) or dedicated NVPE tract with appropriate protection language, as approved by the director or designee, shown on the face of the plat.
Correction 4:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
Critical Area Tract: Deer creek and associated buffer; wetlands and associated buffer shall each be placed in separate 'native growth protection area" tracts. Critical area tracts shall be designated as native growth protection areas and shall be recorded on all documents of title of record for all affected lots. Critical area tracts shall be designated on the face of the plat or recorded drawing in a format approved by the city attorney. The designation shall include the following restrictions:
- An assurance that native vegetation within the growth protection area will be preserved;
-The right of the city to enforce the terms of the restriction; and
-The city will require that that the critical area tract be dedicated to the city, which assures the ownership, maintenance, and protection of the tract in accordance with PMC 19.12.070(4).
Correction 5:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
Short plat document contains too many extraneous sheets and details for final recorded document. Reduce pages and details to only those items listed in Puyallup Municipal Code 19.02.100(2). Engineering details
Correction 6:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
Public pedestrian access: A 15' wide public ROW access shall be provided connecting Shaw Rd with 25th ST SE per PMC 19.12.050 (2) (e-g) and (3) (d-f). This 15' wide access shall be improved as a public pedestrian/ bicycle route following the design standards of WSDOT for shared use paths. This access can be in the form of a public dedication or an easement.
Correction 7:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
The City is interested in acquiring all the property on this parcel that is located in the 1% annual chance flood hazard mapped floodplain area. Please indicate if you are interested in donating this area to the City. If you are interested in donating this property to the City, please contact Paul Marrinan, Civil Engineer, at 253-841-5498 or PMarrinan@puyallupwa.gov
Correction 8:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
Floodplain Habitat Assessment: Critical area report does not include analysis of floodplain impacts or FEMA habitat assessment criteria
Correction 9:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
Correction 10:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
Revise Native Vegetation Protection Easement language to state the following: “A 15-foot “Native Vegetation Protection Easement (NVPE)” area is required along the frontage of Lots 1 and 2. The NVPE is meant to promote the visual quality of the streetscapes and provide additional buffering from major street corridors. A landscape plan meeting city standards shall be provided by the applicant and the following shall be required. The NVPE shall be preserved in accordance with a final landscape plan and shall not be modified, disturbed or otherwise displaced without prior approval from the city’s Planning Department; and, It is the right of the city to enforce the terms of the restriction in the easement area.”
Correction 11:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add cross walk over Deer Creek to sidewalk across the street, Short Plat, Sheet 4 of 8
Correction 12:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Street trees will be required back of walk wherever sidewalks are required, Short Plat, Sheet 4 of 8
Correction 13:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Correction 14:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Correction 15:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Correction 16:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Correction 17:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Correction 18:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
A fee in leu of required 15ft pedestrian access infrastructure, or any of the required pedestrian or frontage improvements required for this development, will not be accepted since these improvements are needed concurrently with the development of the site as a multi-family development.
Reviewer Comments:
External Agency Review
Revisions Required
04/11/2023
04/27/2023
Reviewer:
Corrections:
Correction 1:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
Changes to wetland report required. See Critical Area Review Letter 1 for list of required changes.
Correction 2:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
See comment letters on SEPA noticing from Dept. of Ecology and Nisqually Tribe in document cache.
Correction 3:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
Changes to updated wetland report required. See Critical Area Review Letter 2 dated April 25, 2023 for list of required changes. Please update report to include FEMA Habitat Assessment for floodplain regulations.
Correction 4:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
Reviewer Comments:
Building Review
No Comments
04/11/2023
04/11/2023
Reviewer:
Reviewer Comments:
Fire Review
No Comments
04/11/2023
04/11/2023
Reviewer:
Reviewer Comments:
Engineering Traffic Review
Revisions Required
01/28/2022
05/05/2022
Reviewer:
Corrections:
Correction 1:
See Document Markup
Comments:
1ft no access easement required along lot 1 & 2 frontage. 253.76ft
Correction 2:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Existing roundabout may require pedestrian improvements that may require larger easement
Correction 3:
See Document Markup
Comments:
City may require applicant to pursue pedestrian access to Pioneer Crossing. Peds are unlikely to walk all the way to the existing Shaw Rd traffic signal to enter the adjacent development.
Correction 4:
See Document Markup
Comments:
City may require applicant to provide on-site pedestrian access to 25th St SE. This may also include pedestrian improvements on 25th St SE.
Correction 5:
See Document Markup
Comments:
ROW dedication on 25th St SE
Correction 6:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Reviewer Comments:
Engineering Review
Revisions Required
01/28/2022
03/29/2022
Reviewer:
Corrections:
Correction 1:
See Document Markup
Comments:
In accordance with City codes and standards a proposed project must provide sufficient technical information to allow a finding that the proposed stormwater design is viable. The information contained in this storm report is insufficient for such a finding...see comments associated with Minimum Requirement 4, 7, and 8. In addition, the following specific comments outlined in the City's pre-application letter dated September 28, 2020 were not addressed:a) "The storm report indicates that a large portion of the site surface runoff is being redirected to discharge eastward into Shaw Road. However, Minimum Requirement 4 (MR4) requires the developed site to maintain existing drainage patterns and discharge at the natural location of the site. Based on the existing topographic contours, the natural discharge location for the parcel is at the NW corner of the project (not Shaw Road) which is also the Deer Creek stream corridor (a fish bearing water body). -Revise the preliminary stormwater design to comply with conditions described in MR4 or provide justification for releasing to Shaw Road. -Any documentation in support of changing the natural discharge location shall include appropriate environmental studies to ensure there are no adverse impacts to the stream corridor."b) "There are two Category IV wetlands on the existing parcel which do not appear to be addressed in the introductory storm report. At time of Preliminary Site Plan application, the applicant shall provide a preliminary analysis indicating that the proposed project will comply with Minimum Requirement 8 (MR8), Wetlands Protection."c) "The introductory storm report does not provide any information on how the project intends to comply with Minimum Requirement 7 (MR7), Flow Control. At the time of Preliminary Site Plan application, the applicant shall clarify the stormwater design approach and provide preliminary sizing calculations for any retention/detention facility(ies)." [Storm Report; Page 2]
Correction 2:
See Document Markup
Comments:
In accordance with City codes and standards a proposed project must provide sufficient technical information to allow a finding that the proposed stormwater design is viable. The information contained in this storm report is insufficient for such a finding...see comments associated with Minimum Requirement 4, 7, and 8. In addition, the following specific comments outlined in the City's pre-application letter dated September 28, 2020 were not addressed:
Correction 3:
See Document Markup
Comments:
a) "The storm report indicates that a large portion of the site surface runoff is being redirected to discharge eastward into Shaw Road. However, Minimum Requirement 4 (MR4) requires the developed site to maintain existing drainage patterns and discharge at the natural location of the site. Based on the existing topographic contours, the natural discharge location for the parcel is at the NW corner of the project (not Shaw Road) which is also the Deer Creek stream corridor (a fish bearing water body). -Revise the preliminary stormwater design to comply with conditions described in MR4 or provide justification for releasing to Shaw Road. -Any documentation in support of changing the natural discharge location shall include appropriate environmental studies to ensure there are no adverse impacts to the stream corridor."
Correction 4:
See Document Markup
Comments:
b) "There are two Category IV wetlands on the existing parcel which do not appear to be addressed in the introductory storm report. At time of Preliminary Site Plan application, the applicant shall provide a preliminary analysis indicating that the proposed project will comply with Minimum Requirement 8 (MR8), Wetlands Protection."
Correction 5:
See Document Markup
Comments:
c) "The introductory storm report does not provide any information on how the project intends to comply with Minimum Requirement 7 (MR7), Flow Control. At the time of Preliminary Site Plan application, the applicant shall clarify the stormwater design approach and provide preliminary sizing calculations for any retention/detention facility(ies)."
Correction 6:
See Document Markup
Comments:
[Storm Report; Page 2]
Correction 7:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add comment about the site being previously filled under permit E19-0156. [Storm Report; Section 1.0]
Correction 8:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Runoff must be released at the site's natural discharge location per Minimum Requirement 4. Per the storm report associated with Permit E19-0156, runoff flows from the SE corner of the site to the NW corner via sheet flow and an interceptor ditch along the north property line. [Storm Report; Section 1.0]
Correction 9:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Please include flow chart in this report. [Storm Report; Section 2.0]
Correction 10:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Revise...the predeveloped condition prior to recent fill activity was from east-to-west and must be maintained per MR4. If a portion of the site, prior to fill placement, actually discharged to the east, then the site should be analyzed as a split basin. [Storm Report; Section 2.0]
Correction 11:
See Document Markup
Comments:
There are two wetlands on the property which must be protected per Min. Reqt 8. Prior to short plat approval, provide commentary and supporting calculations on how this will be accomplished. [Storm Report; Section 2.0]
Correction 12:
See Document Markup
Comments:
a) Revise per MR4 comments and the fact that the site discharges to a regulated stream and regulated wetlands. b) Clarify if any runon from upstream (south) properties. c) At time of civil application, provide a more thorough analysis per City Std 201.2(2). [Storm Report; Section 3.0]
Correction 13:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Onsite Flow Control facilities req'd. [Storm Report; Section 2.0]
Correction 14:
See Document Markup
Comments:
See Min. Reqt 4 comments. [Storm Report; Section 2.0]
Correction 15:
See Document Markup
Comments:
This Master Plan indicates fill being placed within the regulated floodplain. Any development activity in the designated floodplain, including the placement of fill, shall comply with PMC 21.07 Flood Damage Protection, particularly the compensatory storage provisions. Quantify the amount of fill to be placed in the floodplain and identify the compensatory storage area, volume, and location. If the compensatory storage area is within the limits of the existing parcel, identify on the short plat document. If the compensatory storage area is outside the existing parcel, identify the parcel as well as the property owner, and record an easement or other document subject to City Attorney approval which will preserve the compensatory storage area in perpetuity. [Storm Report; Appendix A]
Correction 16:
See Document Markup
Comments:
These calculations only indicate undetained discharge to the offsite downstream system. Provide preliminary stormwater calculations that comply with MR7 and MR8 that would support a finding that the proposed stormwater design is viable and complies with the Ecology Manual.. [Storm Report; Appendix B]
Correction 17:
See Document Markup
Comments:
In accordance with City codes and standards a proposed project must provide sufficient technical information to allow a finding that the proposed stormwater design is viable. The information contained in this storm report is insufficient for such a finding...see comments associated with Minimum Requirement 4, 7, and 8. In addition, the following specific comments outlined in the City's Pre-Application letter dated September 28, 2020 were not addressed:
Correction 18:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add Application Number to Document (P-21-0142). [Plans; Sheet 1]
Correction 19:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Typo [Plans; Sheet 1]
Correction 20:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Replace with City Note 6 (or similar) to avoid having to record the Facilities Agreement prior to Short Plat approval. [Plans; Sheet 1]
Correction 21:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Typo [Plans; Sheet 1]
Correction 22:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Addressing shall be provided by EngineeringServices prior to short plat approval. [Plans; Sheet 1]
Correction 23:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add Application Number to Document (P-21-0142). [Plans; Sheet 2]
Correction 24:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Reference this item on the Short Plat document. [Plans; Sheet 2]
Correction 25:
See Document Markup
Comments:
1. No Building Permits will be issued for Lot 1 or Lot 2 until utility and road improvements to include curb, gutter, sidewalk, roadway base, pavement, water, sanitary sewer, storm infrastructure and street lighting are approved and permitted by Development Services Engineering for all street frontages.
Correction 26:
See Document Markup
Comments:
3. Portions of the site are located within a Special Flood Hazard Area as determined by the National Flood Insurance Program Community Panel Number 53053C0342E, dated March 7, 2017 and subsequent LOMR 18-10-0841P dated April 4, 2019. Development of the property shall adhere to the City's Floodplain Management Regulations contained in PMC Chapter 21.07.
Correction 27:
See Document Markup
Comments:
4. A preliminary storm drainage plan is on file for this short plat. No Building Permits will be issued for any lots of this short plat until a permanent storm drainage plan is approved and permitted by Development Services Engineering.
Correction 28:
See Document Markup
Comments:
2. Occupancy for Lot 1 or Lot 2 will not be approved until such time as the required utility and road improvements are constructed by the property owner and accepted by the City.
Correction 29:
See Document Markup
Comments:
5. The owner of Lots 1 through 2 shall record a Stormwater Management & BMP Facilities Agreement, on a form provided by the City, prior to final building permit approval and/or Occupancy.
Correction 30:
See Document Markup
Comments:
6. NOTICE: This short plat will contain a private storm drainage system. Private storm drainage systems are the sole responsibility of the owners, successors, and assignees for all lots being served by the private storm drainage system. Responsibility includes, but is not limited to, constructing, maintaining, repairing, and allowing City inspection of the private storm system in accordance with a separate recorded stormwater management facilities agreement to be filed with the Pierce County Auditor.
Correction 31:
See Document Markup
Comments:
7. No permanent structures(s) shall be erected within any public easement area(s). Permanent structure(s) shall mean any concrete foundation, concrete slab, wall, rockery, pond, stream, building, deck, overhanging structure, fill material, tree, recreational sport court, carport, shed, private utility, fence, or other site improvement that restricts or unreasonably interferes with the need to access or construct utilities in said easements(s). Permanent structure(s) shall not mean improvements such as flowers, ground cover and shrubs less than 3-feet in height, lawn grass, asphalt paving, gravel, or other similar site improvements that do not prevent the access of men, material, and machinery across, along, and within the said easement area. Land restoration within the said easement area due to construction, shall mean planting grass seed or grass sod, asphalt paving, or gravel unless otherwise determined by the City of Puyallup.8. This property is subject to Gravity Sewer Latecomer fee to be paid prior to building permit issuance for either Lot 1 or Lot 2. Reference AFN 2021107061306.
Correction 32:
See Document Markup
Comments:
1. No Building Permits will be issued for Lot 1 or Lot 2 until utility and road improvements to include curb, gutter, sidewalk, roadway base, pavement, water, sanitary sewer, storm infrastructure and street lighting are approved and permitted by Development Services Engineering for all street frontages.
Correction 33:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Indicate Private Street Maintenance Agreement AFN 201911270861 [Plans; Sheet 3]
Correction 34:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add Application Number to Document (P-21-0142). [Plans; Sheet 8]
Correction 35:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add: "AFN 9601180513" [Plans; Sheet 3]
Correction 36:
See Document Markup
Comments:
201210305003 [Plans; Sheet 3]
Correction 37:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add:AFN 200409085002 [Plans; Sheet 3]
Correction 38:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add Application Number to Document (P-21-0142). [Plans; Sheet 4]
Correction 39:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Revise to "Regulated Stream" [Plans; Sheet 4]
Correction 40:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Revise to "Regulated Stream" [Plans; Sheet 4]
Correction 41:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Revise to "Regulated Stream" [Plans; Sheet 4]
Correction 42:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add Application Number to Document (P-21-0142). [Plans; Sheet 5]
Correction 43:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Identify ROW [Plans; Sheet 5]
Correction 44:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Identify Property Line [Plans; Sheet 5]
Correction 45:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Franklin Puyallup, LLC per AFN 201705300235 [Plans; Sheet 5]
Correction 46:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout bearings and distances associated with easement area. [Plans; Sheet 6]
Correction 47:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add Application Number to Document (P-21-0142). [Plans; Sheet 6]
Correction 48:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Identify ROW [Plans; Sheet 6]
Correction 49:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Identify Property Line [Plans; Sheet 6]
Correction 50:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add Application Number to Document (P-21-0142). [Plans; Sheet 7]
Correction 51:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Identify ROW [Plans; Sheet 7]
Correction 52:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Identify Property Line [Plans; Sheet 7]
Correction 53:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add Application Number to Document (P-21-0142). [Plans; Sheet 8]
Correction 54:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout 10-ft ROW dedication [Plans; Sheet 8]
Correction 55:
See Document Markup
Comments:
201210305003 [Plans; Sheet 8]
Correction 56:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add: "AFN 9601180513" [Plans; Sheet 8]
Correction 57:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add:AFN 200409085002 [Plans; Sheet 8]
Correction 58:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify Callout...S01d06'52"W? [Plans; Sheet 8]
Correction 59:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Min. Reqt 8 applies. [Plans; Sheet 8]
Correction 60:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Min. Reqt 8 applies. [Plans; Sheet 8]
Correction 61:
See Document Markup
Comments:
The Master Plan shown in Appendix A of the preliminary storm report indicates fill being placed within the regulated floodplain. Any development activity in the designated floodplain, including the placement of fill, shall comply with PMC 21.07 Flood Damage Protection, particularly the compensatory storage provisions. Quantify the amount of fill to be placed in the floodplain and identify the compensatory storage area, volume, and location. If the compensatory storage area is within the limits of the existing parcel, identify on the short plat document. If the compensatory storage area is outside the existing parcel, identify the parcel as well as the property owner, and record an easement or other document subject to City Attorney approval which will preserve the compensatory storage area in perpetuity. [Plans; Sheet 8]
Correction 62:
See Document Markup
Comments:
2. Occupancy for Lot 1 or Lot 2 will not be approved until such time as the required utility and road improvements are constructed by the property owner and accepted by the City.
Correction 63:
See Document Markup
Comments:
3. Portions of the site are located within a Special Flood Hazard Area as determined by the National Flood Insurance Program Community Panel Number 53053C0342E, dated March 7, 2017 and subsequent LOMR 18-10-0841P dated April 4, 2019. Development of the property shall adhere to the City's Floodplain Management Regulations contained in PMC Chapter 21.07.
Correction 64:
See Document Markup
Comments:
4. A preliminary storm drainage plan is on file for this short plat. No Building Permits will be issued for any lots of this short plat until a permanent storm drainage plan is approved and permitted by Development Services Engineering.
Correction 65:
See Document Markup
Comments:
5. The owner of Lots 1 through 2 shall record a Stormwater Management & BMP Facilities Agreement, on a form provided by the City, prior to final building permit approval and/or Occupancy.
Correction 66:
See Document Markup
Comments:
6. NOTICE: This short plat will contain a private storm drainage system. Private storm drainage systems are the sole responsibility of the owners, successors, and assignees for all lots being served by the private storm drainage system. Responsibility includes, but is not limited to, constructing, maintaining, repairing, and allowing City inspection of the private storm system in accordance with a separate recorded stormwater management facilities agreement to be filed with the Pierce County Auditor.
Correction 67:
See Document Markup
Comments:
7. No permanent structures(s) shall be erected within any public easement area(s). Permanent structure(s) shall mean any concrete foundation, concrete slab, wall, rockery, pond, stream, building, deck, overhanging structure, fill material, tree, recreational sport court, carport, shed, private utility, fence, or other site improvement that restricts or unreasonably interferes with the need to access or construct utilities in said easements(s). Permanent structure(s) shall not mean improvements such as flowers, ground cover and shrubs less than 3-feet in height, lawn grass, asphalt paving, gravel, or other similar site improvements that do not prevent the access of men, material, and machinery across, along, and within the said easement area. Land restoration within the said easement area due to construction, shall mean planting grass seed or grass sod, asphalt paving, or gravel unless otherwise determined by the City of Puyallup.
Correction 68:
See Document Markup
Comments:
8. This property is subject to Gravity Sewer Latecomer fee to be paid prior to building permit issuance for either Lot 1 or Lot 2. Reference AFN 2021107061306. [Plans; Sheet 2]
Correction 69:
See Document Markup
Comments:
a) "The storm report indicates that a large portion of the site surface runoff is being redirected to discharge eastward into Shaw Road. However, Minimum Requirement 4 (MR4) requires the developed site to maintain existing drainage patterns and discharge at the natural location of the site. Based on the existing topographic contours, the natural discharge location for the parcel is at the NW corner of the project (not Shaw Road) which is also the Deer Creek stream corridor (a fish bearing water body). -Revise the preliminary stormwater design to comply with conditions described in MR4 or provide justification for releasing to Shaw Road. -Any documentation in support of changing the natural discharge location shall include appropriate environmental studies to ensure there are no adverse impacts to the stream corridor."
Correction 70:
See Document Markup
Comments:
b) "There are two Category IV wetlands on the existing parcel which do not appear to be addressed in the introductory storm report. At time of Preliminary Site Plan application, the applicant shall provide a preliminary analysis indicating that the proposed project will comply with Minimum Requirement 8 (MR8), Wetlands Protection."
Correction 71:
See Document Markup
Comments:
c) "The introductory storm report does not provide any information on how the project intends to comply with Minimum Requirement 7 (MR7), Flow Control. At the time of Preliminary Site Plan application, the applicant shall clarify the stormwater design approach and provide preliminary sizing calculations for any retention/detention facility(ies)." [Storm Report; Page 2]
Reviewer Comments:
Planning Review
Revisions Required
01/28/2022
03/02/2022
Reviewer:
Corrections:
Correction 1:
See Document Markup
Comments:
A type II, 15-foot vegetative buffer shall apply to all arterial and collector roadways as designated in the comprehensive plan. Said buffers shall be placed in either a into either a native vegetation protection easement (NVPE) or dedicated NVPE tract with appropriate protection language., Short Plat, Sheet 8 of 8
Correction 2:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Correction 3:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Correction 4:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add cross walk over Deer Creek to sidewalk across the street, Short Plat, Sheet 4 of 8
Correction 5:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Street trees will be required back of walk wherever sidewalks are required, Short Plat, Sheet 4 of 8
Correction 6:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Correction 7:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Reviewer Comments:
Planning Review
Revisions Required
01/28/2022
03/02/2022
Reviewer:
Corrections:
Correction 1:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
Street Trees. In order to further implementation of the city’s street tree program, street trees are required to be installed in all plats in accordance with Chapter 11.28 PMC, Street Trees. Proposed subdivisions under this title shall dedicate suitable area for street trees in accordance with city standards for the applicable roadway.
Correction 2:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
The following critical area notes need to be included on the face of the plat document: Lot 2 contains wetland areas and protective wetland buffers. A note shall be included on the face of the plat for each affected lot indicating: “This lot contains a wetland and/or wetland buffer that is protected by federal, state and local regulations. A wetland is a permanently, semi-permanently, or seasonally flooded area of land with a distinct ecosystem based on hydrology, hydric soils, and vegetation adapted for life in water saturated soils. Wetlands provide numerous benefits to the natural environment including water quality, flood control, wildlife habitat, shoreline stability, and aesthetic values. Since the 1780s, Washington has lost 31 percent of its wetland areas, from 1.35 million acres to 938,000 acres, contributing to loss of flood storage and habitat areas. Wetlands are critical to the overall health of watersheds and property owners are key for protecting, restoring, and managing our state's remaining wetland resources. Modification of land or vegetation and/or encroachment/conversion of these areas is strictly prohibited without prior government approval.”
Lot 2 contains a fish and wildlife conservation area. A note shall be included on the face of the plat for each affected lot indicating: “This lot contains a fish and wildlife habitat area that is protected by federal, state and local regulations. These areas serve a critical role in sustaining needed habitats and species for the functional integrity of the ecosystem, and which, if altered, may reduce the likelihood that the species will persist over the long term. Property owners are key for protecting, restoring, and managing our state's remaining habitat areas. Modification of land or vegetation and/or encroachment/conversion of these areas is strictly prohibited without prior government approval.”
Lot 2 contains a 100-year floodplain areas. A note shall be included on the face of the plat for each affected lot indicating: “This lot contains a 100-year floodplain areas, containing a 1% chance every year of flooding/inundation that could affect life, property, structures and improvements. All development and land modifications of floodplain areas requires city approval and consistency with the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP), the Endangered Species Act (ESA), critical areas ordinance (PMC 21.06) and flood protection ordinance (PMC 21.07), as well as any other applicable state, federal and local laws. Modification of land or vegetation, especially land filling that could reduce flood storage capacity, and/or encroachment/conversion of these areas is strictly prohibited without prior government approval.”
Lots 1 and 2 contain critical aquifer recharge areas. A critical aquifer recharge area note for each affected lot shall indicate: “The site is within a high susceptibility/critical aquifer recharge area. Uses and activities on this site shall comply with the city’s critical area ordinance (Puyallup Municipal Code 21.06, Article XI). Activities that do not cause degradation of ground water quality and will not adversely affect the recharging of the aquifer may be permitted in a critical aquifer recharge area and do not require preparation of a critical area report; provided, that they comply with the city storm water management regulations and other applicable local, state and federal regulations.”
Lots 1 and 2 contain a volcanic hazard area. A volcanic hazard area note for each lot affected shall indicate: “The site is within a volcanic hazard area. In the event of an eruption of Mt. Rainier, the site is expected to be inundated by pyroclastic flows, lava flows, debris avalanche, inundation by debris flows, lahars, mudflows, or related flooding resulting from volcanic activities. Uses and activities on this site shall comply with the city’s critical area ordinance (Puyallup Municipal Code 21.06, Article XII, section 21.06.1260, or succeeding section, regarding volcanic hazard areas.”
Correction 3:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
Vegetation buffers: a type II, 15-foot vegetative buffer shall apply to all arterial and collector roadways as designated in the comprehensive plan. Both Shaw Rd and 25th St SE meet this criteria, however since 25th St SE already includes a stream buffer, the 15-foot vegetative buffer will only be required at the Shaw road frontage. Buffers along city roadways shall include clumps of evergreen and deciduous trees intermixed with shrubs and no more than 25 percent turf grass;
When suitable natural vegetation is present, it shall be retained, and if necessary, enhanced with native plant material. Any proposed enhancement shall be set forth in a landscape plan, approved by the development services director or designee, and the landscaping installed prior to final plat approval; and
When suitable natural vegetation is not present, a landscape plan shall be prepared reflecting the use of native plant material, approved by the development services director or designee, and the landscaping installed prior to final plat approval. All native vegetation buffers shall be placed into either a native vegetation protection easement (NVPE) or dedicated NVPE tract with appropriate protection language, as approved by the director or designee, shown on the face of the plat.
Correction 4:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
Critical Area Tract: Deer creek and associated buffer; wetlands and associated buffer shall each be placed in separate 'native growth protection area" tracts. Critical area tracts shall be designated as native growth protection areas and shall be recorded on all documents of title of record for all affected lots. Critical area tracts shall be designated on the face of the plat or recorded drawing in a format approved by the city attorney. The designation shall include the following restrictions:
- An assurance that native vegetation within the growth protection area will be preserved;
-The right of the city to enforce the terms of the restriction; and
-The city will require that that the critical area tract be dedicated to the city, which assures the ownership, maintenance, and protection of the tract in accordance with PMC 19.12.070(4).
Correction 5:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
Short plat document contains too many extraneous sheets and details for final recorded document. Reduce pages and details to only those items listed in Puyallup Municipal Code 19.02.100(2). Engineering details
Correction 6:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
Public pedestrian access: A 15' wide public ROW access shall be provided connecting Shaw Rd with 25th ST SE. This 15' wide access shall be improved as a public pedestrian route.
Correction 7:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
The City is interested in acquiring all the property on this parcel that is located in the 1% annual chance flood hazard mapped floodplain area. Please indicate if you are interested in donating this area to the City. If you are interested in donating this property to the City, please contact Paul Marrinan, Civil Engineer, at 253-841-5498 or PMarrinan@puyallupwa.gov
Correction 8:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
Floodplain Habitat Assessment: Critical area report does not include analysis of floodplain impacts or FEMA habitat assessment criteria
Reviewer Comments:
External Agency Review
Revisions Required
01/28/2022
03/02/2022
Reviewer:
Corrections:
Correction 1:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
Changes to wetland report required. See Critical Area Review Letter 1 for list of required changes.
Correction 2:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
See comment letters on SEPA noticing from Dept. of Ecology and Nisqually Tribe in document cache.
Reviewer Comments:
SEPA & NOA
See comment letters on SEPA noticing from Dept. of Ecology and
SEPA & NOA
See comment letters on SEPA noticing from Dept. of Ecology and Nisqually Tribe in document cache.
SEPA & NOA
See comment letters on SEPA noticing from Dept. of Ecology and Nisqually Tribe in document cache on City portal.
Building Review
No Comments
01/28/2022
01/27/2022
Reviewer:
Reviewer Comments:
Fire Review
No Comments
01/28/2022
01/26/2022
Reviewer:
Reviewer Comments:
Planning Review
VOID
01/28/2022
01/25/2022
Reviewer:
Reviewer Comments:
Fire Review
VOID
12/14/2021
Reviewer:
Reviewer Comments:
Fire-FCO (PLAN REVIEW) - not complete as of data conversion