| Review Type |
Outcome |
Est. Completion Date |
Completed |
|
Engineering Civil Review
|
Approved
|
10/10/2024
|
09/19/2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add Note: "Maintain 5ft min separation between retaining wall components and watermain."
[Plans; Sht C6 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide crossing information for pipe through/under wall. Is protection needed?
[Plans; Sht C10 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify IE's.
[Plans; Sht C11 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Per Stds, match crowns.
[Plans; Sht C11 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide crossing information for pipe through/under wall. Is protection needed?
[Plans; Sht C11 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add Note: "Maintain 5ft min separation between retaining wall components and watermain."
[Plans; Sht C13 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Remove Engineering Approval Block, all sheets.
[Landscape; Sheet L1 of 10]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify callout (L7?).
[Landscape; Sheet L6 of 10]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify callout (L6?).
[Landscape; Sheet L7 of 10]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
POC?
[Landscape; Sheet L7 of 10]
|
|
Planning Review
|
VOID
|
10/10/2024
|
09/19/2024
|
|
|
|
|
Fire Review
|
VOID
|
10/10/2024
|
09/19/2024
|
|
|
|
|
Public Works Streets Review
|
VOID
|
10/10/2024
|
09/19/2024
|
|
|
|
|
Public Works Water Review
|
VOID
|
10/10/2024
|
09/19/2024
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Traffic Review
|
Approved
|
10/10/2024
|
09/19/2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Shift/modify wall farther from sight line. Slight obstruction shown. Due to construction variability + survey accuracy, need to have a design buffer to ensure no obstruction exists. Civil - C21
|
|
|
See Document Markup
In addition to provided sight line comment, remove paved patio area to ensure there is no pedestrian access in this area (per previous comment). Civil - C21
|
|
Public Works Collection Review
|
Approved
|
10/10/2024
|
09/18/2024
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Storm Review
|
VOID
|
10/10/2024
|
09/18/2024
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Traffic Review
|
Failed
|
08/16/2024
|
08/14/2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Coordinate with the Planning Dept (Chris Beale) about relocation of these (4) trees closer to the building (outside the sight distance triangle) [Landscape L2]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Walls not shown in ESD profile. Civil - C21
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Per previous comments, sight distance analysis must include vertical profile that identifies future improvements. Sight distance compliance must be field verified at project completion. ESD verification will be included as a condition of building occupancy. Civil - C21
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Show location of wall + vertical profile of future improvements @ sight line. Civil - C21
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Remove pedestrian access from this area. Tables, chairs, umbrellas, etc will block sight distance. Civil - C21
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Shift/modify wall farther from sight line. Slight obstruction shown. Due to construction variability + survey accuracy, need to have a design buffer to ensure no obstruction exists. Civil - C21
|
|
|
See Document Markup
In addition to provided sight line comment, remove paved patio area to ensure there is no pedestrian access in this area (per previous comment). Civil - C21
|
|
Public Works Water Review
|
Approved
|
08/16/2024
|
08/13/2024
|
|
|
|
|
Planning Review
|
Approved
|
08/16/2024
|
08/12/2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Daffodils required in 12 foot front setback yard area. See section 7.4 of the VMS and integrate into design and plant list on sheet L3.
[Planning comment sheet L2]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
|
|
Engineering Civil Review
|
Failed
|
08/16/2024
|
08/09/2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Prior to civil permit issuance, the project's critical area biologist shall evaluate the existing stormwater treatment wetland plantings to ensure the wetland plantings are thriving and comply with the current 2019 Ecology Manual criteria. (Please provide the 'wetland tech memo' which was not found in the landuse resubmittals as suggested.)
[Storm Report; Pg 1 of 611]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Revise-City standards requires a minimum 10ft separation of watermain to foundations. However, the City is willing to allow 5ft min separation btwn the retaining wall and main.
[Plans; Sht C6 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Revise to 8in conveyance pipe as continuance of existing system.
[Plans; Sheet C10 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout cleanout at juncture.
[Plans; Sheet C10 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout and show how the north half and west side areas of the roof are being conveyed to the existing storm pond.
[Plans; Sheet C10 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Where's this going?
[Plans; Sheet C10 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add-"and City Standards".
[Plans; Sheet C10 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Readability.
[Plans; Sheet C10 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Readability.
[Plans; Sheet C10 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify IE with pipe slope callout btwn CO20 and CB#1.
[Plans; Sheet C10 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Per City Stds, match IEs for 12in and crown for 8in.
[Plans; Sheet C10 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Clarify what conveyance pipe CO7-CO9 are draining to.
[Plans; Sheet C10 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout trench drain outlet IE.
[Plans; Sheet C10 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Use 8in pipe per City Stds.
[Plans; Sheet C10 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify pipe slope with IE callouts.
[Plans; Sheet C10 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
See CB #1 comment.
[Plans; Sheet C10 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout outlet IE.
[Plans; Sheet C10 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add "w/ trash rack".
[Plans; Sheet C10 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Readability.
[Plans; Sht C11 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify callout.
[Plans; Sht C11 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Show on plan.
[Plans; Sht C11 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify leader location.
[Plans; Sht C12 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify pipe length callout.
[Plans; Sht C12 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Revise-City standards requires a minimum 10ft separation of watermain to foundations. However, the City is willing to allow 5ft min separation btwn the retaining wall and main.
[Plans; Sht C13 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Clarify-shouldn't there be a grade board at this downstream location? As the trench section fills up, water will begin to spill out of the trench section at this lower elevation before reaching the top of the grade board as shown. Also, it seems this configuration would also allow water to spill over the sides of the 8ft 'trench extension' before filling up the remainder of the trench resulting in concentrated water being discharged down the slope.
[Plans; Sheet C16 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Use 8in pipe per City Stds.
[Plans; Sheet C20 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add Note: "Maintain 5ft min separation between retaining wall components and watermain."
[Plans; Sht C6 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide crossing information for pipe through/under wall. Is protection needed?
[Plans; Sht C10 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify IE's.
[Plans; Sht C11 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Per Stds, match crowns.
[Plans; Sht C11 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide crossing information for pipe through/under wall. Is protection needed?
[Plans; Sht C11 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add Note: "Maintain 5ft min separation between retaining wall components and watermain."
[Plans; Sht C13 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Remove Engineering Approval Block, all sheets.
[Landscape; Sheet L1 of 10]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify callout (L7?).
[Landscape; Sheet L6 of 10]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify callout (L6?).
[Landscape; Sheet L7 of 10]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
POC?
[Landscape; Sheet L7 of 10]
|
|
Public Works Streets Review
|
Approved
|
08/16/2024
|
08/09/2024
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Storm Review
|
VOID
|
08/16/2024
|
08/08/2024
|
|
|
|
|
Public Works Collection Review
|
Approved
|
08/16/2024
|
07/31/2024
|
|
|
|
|
Fire Review
|
Approved
|
08/16/2024
|
07/26/2024
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Traffic Review
|
Failed
|
06/26/2024
|
06/26/2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
Per conditions of preliminary site plan, design team is required to submit a detailed sight distance analysis with civil permit submittal. For the 39th Ave SE access, sight distance analysis must show current standards are being met (ESD, SSD, object/eye height etc). Analysis will include horizontal + vertical exhibits that identifies future improvements, any sight obstructions, and extent of berm removal. Include exhibits within Civil plan set. Grading plan to include profile view of sight line to ensure compliance.
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
City of Puyallup is actively coordinating with Pierce Transit on the preferred location for the proposed bus shelter. Prior to resubmittal, please coordinate with the City to determine best location for the new bus shelter.
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Required sight distance analysis will evaluate any possible impacts associated with Type IIa landscaping. Identify new location of new monument sign in sight distance analysis. [Landscape L2]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Coordinate with the Planning Dept (Chris Beale) about relocation of these (4) trees closer to the building (outside the sight distance triangle) [Landscape L2]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Walls not shown in ESD profile. Civil - C21
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Per previous comments, sight distance analysis must include vertical profile that identifies future improvements. Sight distance compliance must be field verified at project completion. ESD verification will be included as a condition of building occupancy. Civil - C21
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Show location of wall + vertical profile of future improvements @ sight line. Civil - C21
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Remove pedestrian access from this area. Tables, chairs, umbrellas, etc will block sight distance. Civil - C21
|
|
Public Works Streets Review
|
VOID
|
06/26/2024
|
06/18/2024
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Civil Review
|
Failed
|
06/26/2024
|
06/18/2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify.
[Storm Report; Pg 5 of 503]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Address BMP T7.30 and BMP T5.10B also.
[Storm Report; Pg 5 of 503]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Address BMP T7.30 and BMP T5.11 or BMP T5.12 per Ecology Table I-3.2 also.
[Storm Report; Pg 5 of 503]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Per prior comment on the landuse application, the project's critical area biologist shall evaluate the existing treatment wetland plantings to ensure the wetland plantings are thriving and comply with the current 2019 Ecology Manual criteria.
[Storm Report; Pg 5 of 503]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Per prior comment on the landuse application, provide commentary that Phase 2 is utilizing storm facilities associated with the 2005 Ecology Manual, but the current phase has been evaluated against, and complies with, the currently adopted 2019 Ecology Manual.
[Storm Report; Pg 8 of 503]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Revise to reflect existing conditions at the time of this Phase 2 project.
[Storm Report; Pg 10 of 503]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add: "after treatment and detention within the existing storm facility constructed in Phase 1"...or similar language.
[Storm Report; Pg 10 of 503]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Per prior comment on the landuse application, clearly delineate the North and South basins on the basin map(s).
[Storm Report; Pg 10 of 503]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Per prior comment on the landuse application, it appears the Phase 1 WWHM modeling inappropriately used 'Forest' as the Mitigated pervious land use type. In accordance with the 2005 Ecology Manual adopted at the time of Phase 1, the correct landuse type should have been 'Lawn/Landscape'. To ensure the existing stormwater facility is compliant for MR6 and MR7 in accordance with adopted stormwater regulations, both then and now, provide updated WWHM modeling for the overall buildout scenario.
[Storm Report; Pg 22 of 503]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Per prior comment on the landuse application and prior to civil permit issuance, the project's critical area biologist shall evaluate the existing treatment wetland plantings to ensure the wetland plantings are thriving and comply with the current 2019 Ecology Manual criteria.
[Storm Report; Pg 22 of 503]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Per Phase 1 calculations, the Stormfilter was only sized to collect tributary runoff from the access road. The current design has substantially increased the flow to this filter, both pollution generating and non-pollution generating and must be sized accordingly. See Ecology, Section III-2.6.
[Storm Report; Pg 22 of 503]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Calculations not provided for PH2.
[Storm Report; Pg 23 of 503]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Please provide a scaled architectural roof plan of the PH1 Brownstone to ensure the existing stormwater pond is adequately sized for the project buildout.
[Storm Report; Pg 29 of 503]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Per prior comment on the landuse application, it appears the Phase 1 WWHM modeling inappropriately used 'Forest' as the Mitigated pervious land use type. In accordance with the 2005 Ecology Manual adopted at the time of Phase 1, the correct landuse type should have been 'Lawn/Landscape'. To ensure the existing stormwater facility is compliant for MR6 and MR7 in accordance with adopted stormwater regulations, both then and now, provide updated WWHM modeling for the overall buildout scenario.
[Storm Report; Pg 29 of 503]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
It appears from the civil drawings that this roof area is intended to discharge undetained into Wetland C. If so, provide an updated MR8 analysis to ensure the wetland is not compromised. Depending on the category and habitat score of the wetland, the project WWHM may have to be rerun to account for this roof area as bypass.
[Storm Report; Pg 29 of 503]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Per prior comment on the landuse application, clearly delineate the North and South basins on the basin map(s).
[Storm Report; Pg 29 of 503]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-is this area accounted for in the basin calculation?
[Storm Report; Pg 29 of 503]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Please use BMPs from the Ecology Manual.
[Storm Report; Pg 149 of 503]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Please use BMPs from the City's 'Stormwater Maintenance Manual for Private Facilities'. If a specific BMP is not in the City's manual, then use the Ecology Manual.
[Storm Report; Pg 234 of 503]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Per prior comment on the landuse application, this is an incorrect landuse type (should have been Lawn/Landscaping per the 2005 Ecology Manual) for the Mitigated scenario and should have been corrected during the Phase 1 application. Provide corrected WWHM modeling for the PH1 and PH2 buildout scenario and confirm that the existing detention facility is properly sized.
[Storm Report; Pg 356 of 503]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Per prior comment on the landuse application and in accordance with City Standards Section 2.0:
-locate the Vicinity Map in lower right corner with address below
-locate the Approval Block in upper right corner
[Plans; Sht C1 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add brief legal description (T/R/QS)
[Plans; Sht C1 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Please locate in upper right corner.
[Plans; Sht C2 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Please locate in upper right corner.
[Plans; Sht C3 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-sewer callout.
[Plans; Sht C3 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-storm callout.
[Plans; Sht C3 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-storm callout.
[Plans; Sht C3 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Please locate in upper right corner.
[Plans; Sht C4 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Please locate in upper right corner.
[Plans; Sht C5 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Note to Engr: Building Permit(s) required for any retaining wall over 4ft (bottom of footing-to-top of wall) or any retaining wall that is surcharged.
[Plans; Sht C5 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Prior to permit issuance, provide letter or statement from the retaining wall EoR that the west wall design includes an evaluation of potential surcharge loading from the adjacent building.
[Plans; Sht C5 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout sheet number.
[Plans; Sht C5 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
See PMC 20.58.005(2)a for retaining wall setback criteria.
[Plans; Sht C5 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Clarify-Do not find this designation on the plan. Is this for a specific wall or all of the proposed walls.
[Plans; Sht C5 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Please locate in upper right corner.
[Plans; Sht C6 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Note to Engr: Building Permit(s) required for any retaining wall over 4ft (bottom of footing-to-top of wall) or any retaining wall that is surcharged.
[Plans; Sht C6 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
See PMC 20.58.005(2)a for retaining wall setback criteria.
[Plans; Sht C6 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
See comment Sheet C5.
[Plans; Sht C6 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide spot elevations (TW/BW).
[Plans; Sht C6 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Please locate in upper right corner.
[Plans; Sht C7 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Clarify-no curb to direct runoff to the conveyance system?
[Plans; Sht C7 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Clarify-how is runoff being captured at this low point and conveyed to a conveyance system?
[Plans; Sht C7 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Revise trash enclosure area to comply with City Standards Section 208.
[Plans; Sht C7 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Revise pad elevations to slope to sanitary catch basin. See City Standards Section 208.
[Plans; Sht C7 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add Note: See Building Permit for trash enclosure structure.
[Plans; Sht C7 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Please locate in upper right corner.
[Plans; Sht C8 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Please locate in upper right corner.
[Plans; Sht C9 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide spot elevations (TW/BW).
[Plans; Sht C6 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
This roof area was not included in the original PH1 MR8 wetland analysis. If this PH2 roof area will direct discharge to the wetland as shown, provide an updated MR8 analysis to ensure the wetland is not compromised. Depending on the category and habitat score of the wetland, the project WWHM may have to be rerun to account for this roof area as bypass.
[Plans; Sheet C10 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout Roof Drain IE at existing connection.
[Plans; Sht C10 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Show new pipe run and callout size, length, and slope.
[Plans; Sht C10 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout dimension(s) of relocated dispersion trench.
[Plans; Sht C10 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide IE.
[Plans; Sht C10 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout size, length, and slope of pipe run.
[Plans; Sht C10 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout dimension(s) of dispersion trench.
[Plans; Sht C10 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify callout.
[Plans; Sht C10 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Remove note.
[Plans; Sht C10 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Per Phase 1 calculations, this Stormfilter was only sized to collect tributary runoff from the access road. Revise accordingly. See Ecology, Section III-2.6 regarding pollution generating and non-pollution generating runoff draining to a single treatment device.
[Plans; Sheet C10 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Please locate in upper right corner.
[Plans; Sht C10 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
See comments on Sheet C7 for this raised parking area.
[Plans; Sheet C10 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Use DI due to shallow bury.
[Plans; Sht C10 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Readability.
[Plans; Sheet C10 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide Trench Drain Rim Elev.
[Plans; Sht C10 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Please locate in upper right corner.
[Plans; Sht C11 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Remove note.
[Plans; Sht C11 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide Trench Drain Rim & IE.
[Plans; Sht C11 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
IE South?
[Plans; Sht C11 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Show and callout retaining wall foundation drain discharge location(s). (splash pad? other?)
[Plans; Sht C11 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide sizing calculations and include in the Storm Report.
[Plans; Sht C12 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Please locate in upper right corner.
[Plans; Sht C12 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide cleanout at the building w/ rim and IE.
[Plans; Sht C12 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Show proposed vent location.
[Plans; Sht C12 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout sampling station w/ rim and IE.
[Plans; Sht C12 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Use catch basin and slope TE pad accordingly...See City Standards 208 for additional criteria.
[Plans; Sht C12 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout pipe slope.
[Plans; Sht C12 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout pipe slope.
[Plans; Sht C12 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout pipe slope.
[Plans; Sht C12 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Show valve on plan.
[Plans; Sht C12 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Show and callout shutoff valve within 10ft downstream of the separator.
[Plans; Sht C12 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Clarify upstream conveyance to the separator (how is oil/grease laden water being conveyed). See City Stds 402.2(7).
[Plans; Sht C12 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Max hydrant run is 50ft. Use 8in branch line to supply hydrant lead as shown. Callout fitting info (tee w/ Blind Flange; 6in GV; 2ft min stub; etc).
[Plans; Sht C12 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Revise to 8in.
[Plans; Sht C12 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add Fire Code Official approval block to this sheet.
[Plans; Sht C13 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add Note: "Min 10ft of straight pipe required prior to entering separator."
[Plans; Sht C13 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Show and callout shutoff valve within 10ft downstream of the separator.
[Plans; Sht C13 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide sizing calculations and include in the Storm Report.
[Plans; Sht C13 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Show proposed vent location.
[Plans; Sht C13 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add Note: "Min 10ft of straight pipe required prior to entering interceptor."
[Plans; Sht C13 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Please locate in upper right corner.
[Plans; Sht C13 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add Fire Code Official approval block to this sheet.
[Plans; Sht C13 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout new pipe runs (Typ.).
[Plans; Sht C13 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Note to Engr: Confirm whether the geotechnical engineer's recommended note contained in Terra Associates, Inc May 22nd, 2023 addendum should be included on the civil drawings.
[Plans; Sheet C14 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Please locate in upper right corner.
[Plans; Sht C14 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Use current Stormwater Notes (see City Stds Section 207).
[Plans; Sht C14 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Use current Water System Notes (see City Stds Section 304).
[Plans; Sht C14 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Use current Sanitary Sewer Notes (see City Stds Section 405).
[Plans; Sht C14 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Please locate in upper right corner.
[Plans; Sht C15 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add City Std Detail 02.05.02.
[Plans; Sheet C15 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Replace w/ Std Detail 06.01.01. [Plans; Sheet C15 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Please locate in upper right corner.
[Plans; Sht C16 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide dimensional info for these sections.
[Plans; Sht C16 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Update all of these details to current standard.
[Plans; Sht C17 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Please locate in upper right corner.
[Plans; Sht C18 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Update noted details to current standard.
[Plans; Sht C18 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Remove this detail as it is not applicable to the project.
[Plans; Sht C18 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Please locate in upper right corner.
[Plans; Sht C19 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Replace this detail with current standard.
[Plans; Sht C19 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add Landscape-Utility clearance note here.
[Plans; Sht L1 of 10]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add Landscape-Utility clearance note here.
[Plans; Sht L2 of 10]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Relocate tree to provide min. clearance to water utility.
[Plans; Sht L2 of 10]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
See CSWWP review comments in the Storm Report.
[CSWWP; Pg 1 of 503]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Prior to civil permit issuance, the project's critical area biologist shall evaluate the existing stormwater treatment wetland plantings to ensure the wetland plantings are thriving and comply with the current 2019 Ecology Manual criteria. (Please provide the 'wetland tech memo' which was not found in the landuse resubmittals as suggested.)
[Storm Report; Pg 1 of 611]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Revise-City standards requires a minimum 10ft separation of watermain to foundations. However, the City is willing to allow 5ft min separation btwn the retaining wall and main.
[Plans; Sht C6 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Revise to 8in conveyance pipe as continuance of existing system.
[Plans; Sheet C10 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout cleanout at juncture.
[Plans; Sheet C10 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout and show how the north half and west side areas of the roof are being conveyed to the existing storm pond.
[Plans; Sheet C10 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Where's this going?
[Plans; Sheet C10 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add-"and City Standards".
[Plans; Sheet C10 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Readability.
[Plans; Sheet C10 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Readability.
[Plans; Sheet C10 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify IE with pipe slope callout btwn CO20 and CB#1.
[Plans; Sheet C10 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Per City Stds, match IEs for 12in and crown for 8in.
[Plans; Sheet C10 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Clarify what conveyance pipe CO7-CO9 are draining to.
[Plans; Sheet C10 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout trench drain outlet IE.
[Plans; Sheet C10 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Use 8in pipe per City Stds.
[Plans; Sheet C10 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify pipe slope with IE callouts.
[Plans; Sheet C10 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
See CB #1 comment.
[Plans; Sheet C10 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout outlet IE.
[Plans; Sheet C10 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add "w/ trash rack".
[Plans; Sheet C10 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Readability.
[Plans; Sht C11 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify callout.
[Plans; Sht C11 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Show on plan.
[Plans; Sht C11 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify leader location.
[Plans; Sht C12 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify pipe length callout.
[Plans; Sht C12 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Revise-City standards requires a minimum 10ft separation of watermain to foundations. However, the City is willing to allow 5ft min separation btwn the retaining wall and main.
[Plans; Sht C13 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Clarify-shouldn't there be a grade board at this downstream location? As the trench section fills up, water will begin to spill out of the trench section at this lower elevation before reaching the top of the grade board as shown. Also, it seems this configuration would also allow water to spill over the sides of the 8ft 'trench extension' before filling up the remainder of the trench resulting in concentrated water being discharged down the slope.
[Plans; Sheet C16 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Use 8in pipe per City Stds.
[Plans; Sheet C20 of 21]
|
|
Fire Review
|
Approved
|
06/26/2024
|
06/18/2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
1. Per pre-app notes PLPSP20220108: The current gravel path around the existing Lodge building "called out as asphalt on the plan" will be required to extend around the proposed addition to the Lodge. This will require the current path to be paved and extend to the entrance behind Lowes. This will be nonnegotiable as it will be utilized as a fire fighter access around the building. Path is labeled (New Fire Department access path) Path needs to be called out as asphalt. Gates will be accepted to keep tenants off the path if desired for safety and security.
|
|
Engineering Storm Review
|
VOID
|
06/26/2024
|
06/14/2024
|
|
|
|
|
Public Works Water Review
|
Approved
|
06/26/2024
|
06/05/2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Civil Sheet C12: Call out '3" x 12" tapping sleeve on existing main with 3" FlxMJ valve and concrete thrust blocking.' Tapping sleeve does not need to be stainless steel. Show gate valve on tapping sleeve.
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Civil Sheet C13: Presently there is a 4-inch tee with gate valve with a 4-inch ductile iron stub. There is not an existing 3-inch water meter and RPBA.
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Civil Sheet C13: Presently there is a 8-inch tee with gate valve with a 8-inch ductile iron stub. There is not an existing 8-inch DDCVA.
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Civil Sheet C13: Remove this comment. The water service will be installed to the south.
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Civil Sheet C13: Presently no 4-inch FDC exists.
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Civil Sheet C13: Remove this comment. This existing 12-inch bend will not be disturbed.
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Civil Sheet C13: These proposed 12-inch 22-degree bends should be able to be removed, if the required east / west water relocation is shifted further to the south.
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Civil Sheet C17: Remove this standard detail. It is not needed for this project.
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Civil Sheet C17: Remove this standard detail. There is no new 1.5-inch or 2-inch service for this project.
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Civil Sheet C18: Remove this detail. It will not be used in this project.
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Civil Sheet C12: The maximum hydrant run allowed is 20-feet. Call out an 8-inch tapping tee (stainless steel not required) on existing 12-inch DI with 8-inch gate valve and blocking. Install 80 LF of 8-inch DI. At the hydrant location call out an 8" Fl x 6" MJ tee with 8" MJ plug to west. 1-6" Fl x MJ GV. 2 LF of 6" DI and fire hydrant assembly per City Standards.
|
|
Public Works Collection Review
|
Approved
|
06/26/2024
|
06/03/2024
|
|
|
|
|
Planning Review
|
Failed
|
06/26/2024
|
05/29/2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Care center review cannot occur fully until land use and SEPA are complete. Previous early submittal waiver form only permitted submittal of civil and building permits for Brownstone building/site area. [Planning comment, sheet C1]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
PMC 20.58.005 (2)(ii) requires retaining walls to set back minimum of 6 feet with a maximum of 6 feet in height. The wall is located in the six foot setback area and some areas of the wall exceed 6 feet in height [Planning comment, sheet C5]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Wall near the brownstone structure is a cut wall (facing interior to site). PMC 20.58.005 (2)(ii) will not apply to this wall system. [Planning comment, sheet C6]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Some of these trees appear to be in a flat, ungraded area below the cut wall on sheet C6. Please submit an arborist tree risk assessment for possible retention. Arborist shall also assess trees in gas pipeline easement and provide limits of clearing recommendation for trees to be retained within easement area [planning comment, sheet C3]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide hydroperiod analysis for new dispersion of storm water run off into wetland c [planning comment, sheet C5]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
PMC 20.58.005 (2) requires a 6 foot landscape setback. The walkway and wall system appear to eliminate the buffer in this stretch. [Planning comment, sheet C5]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Consider adjusting wall interior to the site to retain existing trees in this area. Project arborist to review plan sheet and coordinate with design to determine feasibility of tree retention [Planning comment, sheet C6]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
PMC 20.58.005 (2) requires a 6 foot landscape setback. The walkway and wall system appear to eliminate the buffer in this stretch. [Planning comment, sheet L1]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Landscape island missing a tree. Please relocate civil utility and show required tree here [Planning comment, sheet L1]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Landscape island must include evergreen shrubs to provide 90 percent coverage [Planning comment, sheet L1]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Daffodils required in 12 foot front setback yard area. See section 7.4 of the VMS and integrate into design and plant list on sheet L3.
[Planning comment sheet L2]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide coordination documentation from Pierce Transit (Tina Vaslet, bus stop planner) if the pad and shelter will be relocated [planning comment, sheet C3]
|
|
Engineering Civil Review
|
Failed
|
10/13/2023
|
10/20/2023
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify.
[Storm Report; Pg 5 of 503]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Address BMP T7.30 and BMP T5.10B also.
[Storm Report; Pg 5 of 503]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Address BMP T7.30 and BMP T5.11 or BMP T5.12 per Ecology Table I-3.2 also.
[Storm Report; Pg 5 of 503]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Per prior comment on the landuse application, the project's critical area biologist shall evaluate the existing treatment wetland plantings to ensure the wetland plantings are thriving and comply with the current 2019 Ecology Manual criteria.
[Storm Report; Pg 5 of 503]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Per prior comment on the landuse application, provide commentary that Phase 2 is utilizing storm facilities associated with the 2005 Ecology Manual, but the current phase has been evaluated against, and complies with, the currently adopted 2019 Ecology Manual.
[Storm Report; Pg 8 of 503]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Revise to reflect existing conditions at the time of this Phase 2 project.
[Storm Report; Pg 10 of 503]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add: "after treatment and detention within the existing storm facility constructed in Phase 1"...or similar language.
[Storm Report; Pg 10 of 503]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Per prior comment on the landuse application, clearly delineate the North and South basins on the basin map(s).
[Storm Report; Pg 10 of 503]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Per prior comment on the landuse application, it appears the Phase 1 WWHM modeling inappropriately used 'Forest' as the Mitigated pervious land use type. In accordance with the 2005 Ecology Manual adopted at the time of Phase 1, the correct landuse type should have been 'Lawn/Landscape'. To ensure the existing stormwater facility is compliant for MR6 and MR7 in accordance with adopted stormwater regulations, both then and now, provide updated WWHM modeling for the overall buildout scenario.
[Storm Report; Pg 22 of 503]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Per prior comment on the landuse application and prior to civil permit issuance, the project's critical area biologist shall evaluate the existing treatment wetland plantings to ensure the wetland plantings are thriving and comply with the current 2019 Ecology Manual criteria.
[Storm Report; Pg 22 of 503]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Per Phase 1 calculations, the Stormfilter was only sized to collect tributary runoff from the access road. The current design has substantially increased the flow to this filter, both pollution generating and non-pollution generating and must be sized accordingly. See Ecology, Section III-2.6.
[Storm Report; Pg 22 of 503]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Calculations not provided for PH2.
[Storm Report; Pg 23 of 503]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Please provide a scaled architectural roof plan of the PH1 Brownstone to ensure the existing stormwater pond is adequately sized for the project buildout.
[Storm Report; Pg 29 of 503]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Per prior comment on the landuse application, it appears the Phase 1 WWHM modeling inappropriately used 'Forest' as the Mitigated pervious land use type. In accordance with the 2005 Ecology Manual adopted at the time of Phase 1, the correct landuse type should have been 'Lawn/Landscape'. To ensure the existing stormwater facility is compliant for MR6 and MR7 in accordance with adopted stormwater regulations, both then and now, provide updated WWHM modeling for the overall buildout scenario.
[Storm Report; Pg 29 of 503]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
It appears from the civil drawings that this roof area is intended to discharge undetained into Wetland C. If so, provide an updated MR8 analysis to ensure the wetland is not compromised. Depending on the category and habitat score of the wetland, the project WWHM may have to be rerun to account for this roof area as bypass.
[Storm Report; Pg 29 of 503]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Per prior comment on the landuse application, clearly delineate the North and South basins on the basin map(s).
[Storm Report; Pg 29 of 503]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-is this area accounted for in the basin calculation?
[Storm Report; Pg 29 of 503]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Please use BMPs from the Ecology Manual.
[Storm Report; Pg 149 of 503]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Please use BMPs from the City's 'Stormwater Maintenance Manual for Private Facilities'. If a specific BMP is not in the City's manual, then use the Ecology Manual.
[Storm Report; Pg 234 of 503]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Per prior comment on the landuse application, this is an incorrect landuse type (should have been Lawn/Landscaping per the 2005 Ecology Manual) for the Mitigated scenario and should have been corrected during the Phase 1 application. Provide corrected WWHM modeling for the PH1 and PH2 buildout scenario and confirm that the existing detention facility is properly sized.
[Storm Report; Pg 356 of 503]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Per prior comment on the landuse application and in accordance with City Standards Section 2.0:
-locate the Vicinity Map in lower right corner with address below
-locate the Approval Block in upper right corner
[Plans; Sht C1 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add brief legal description (T/R/QS)
[Plans; Sht C1 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Please locate in upper right corner.
[Plans; Sht C2 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Please locate in upper right corner.
[Plans; Sht C3 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-sewer callout.
[Plans; Sht C3 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-storm callout.
[Plans; Sht C3 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-storm callout.
[Plans; Sht C3 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Please locate in upper right corner.
[Plans; Sht C4 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Please locate in upper right corner.
[Plans; Sht C5 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Note to Engr: Building Permit(s) required for any retaining wall over 4ft (bottom of footing-to-top of wall) or any retaining wall that is surcharged.
[Plans; Sht C5 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Prior to permit issuance, provide letter or statement from the retaining wall EoR that the west wall design includes an evaluation of potential surcharge loading from the adjacent building.
[Plans; Sht C5 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout sheet number.
[Plans; Sht C5 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
See PMC 20.58.005(2)a for retaining wall setback criteria.
[Plans; Sht C5 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Clarify-Do not find this designation on the plan. Is this for a specific wall or all of the proposed walls.
[Plans; Sht C5 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Please locate in upper right corner.
[Plans; Sht C6 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Note to Engr: Building Permit(s) required for any retaining wall over 4ft (bottom of footing-to-top of wall) or any retaining wall that is surcharged.
[Plans; Sht C6 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
See PMC 20.58.005(2)a for retaining wall setback criteria.
[Plans; Sht C6 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
See comment Sheet C5.
[Plans; Sht C6 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide spot elevations (TW/BW).
[Plans; Sht C6 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Please locate in upper right corner.
[Plans; Sht C7 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Clarify-no curb to direct runoff to the conveyance system?
[Plans; Sht C7 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Clarify-how is runoff being captured at this low point and conveyed to a conveyance system?
[Plans; Sht C7 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Revise trash enclosure area to comply with City Standards Section 208.
[Plans; Sht C7 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Revise pad elevations to slope to sanitary catch basin. See City Standards Section 208.
[Plans; Sht C7 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add Note: See Building Permit for trash enclosure structure.
[Plans; Sht C7 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Please locate in upper right corner.
[Plans; Sht C8 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Please locate in upper right corner.
[Plans; Sht C9 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide spot elevations (TW/BW).
[Plans; Sht C6 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
This roof area was not included in the original PH1 MR8 wetland analysis. If this PH2 roof area will direct discharge to the wetland as shown, provide an updated MR8 analysis to ensure the wetland is not compromised. Depending on the category and habitat score of the wetland, the project WWHM may have to be rerun to account for this roof area as bypass.
[Plans; Sheet C10 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout Roof Drain IE at existing connection.
[Plans; Sht C10 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Show new pipe run and callout size, length, and slope.
[Plans; Sht C10 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout dimension(s) of relocated dispersion trench.
[Plans; Sht C10 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide IE.
[Plans; Sht C10 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout size, length, and slope of pipe run.
[Plans; Sht C10 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout dimension(s) of dispersion trench.
[Plans; Sht C10 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify callout.
[Plans; Sht C10 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Remove note.
[Plans; Sht C10 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Per Phase 1 calculations, this Stormfilter was only sized to collect tributary runoff from the access road. Revise accordingly. See Ecology, Section III-2.6 regarding pollution generating and non-pollution generating runoff draining to a single treatment device.
[Plans; Sheet C10 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Please locate in upper right corner.
[Plans; Sht C10 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
See comments on Sheet C7 for this raised parking area.
[Plans; Sheet C10 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Use DI due to shallow bury.
[Plans; Sht C10 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Readability.
[Plans; Sheet C10 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide Trench Drain Rim Elev.
[Plans; Sht C10 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Please locate in upper right corner.
[Plans; Sht C11 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Remove note.
[Plans; Sht C11 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide Trench Drain Rim & IE.
[Plans; Sht C11 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
IE South?
[Plans; Sht C11 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Show and callout retaining wall foundation drain discharge location(s). (splash pad? other?)
[Plans; Sht C11 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide sizing calculations and include in the Storm Report.
[Plans; Sht C12 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Please locate in upper right corner.
[Plans; Sht C12 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide cleanout at the building w/ rim and IE.
[Plans; Sht C12 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Show proposed vent location.
[Plans; Sht C12 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout sampling station w/ rim and IE.
[Plans; Sht C12 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Use catch basin and slope TE pad accordingly...See City Standards 208 for additional criteria.
[Plans; Sht C12 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout pipe slope.
[Plans; Sht C12 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout pipe slope.
[Plans; Sht C12 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout pipe slope.
[Plans; Sht C12 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Show valve on plan.
[Plans; Sht C12 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Show and callout shutoff valve within 10ft downstream of the separator.
[Plans; Sht C12 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Clarify upstream conveyance to the separator (how is oil/grease laden water being conveyed). See City Stds 402.2(7).
[Plans; Sht C12 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Max hydrant run is 50ft. Use 8in branch line to supply hydrant lead as shown. Callout fitting info (tee w/ Blind Flange; 6in GV; 2ft min stub; etc).
[Plans; Sht C12 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Revise to 8in.
[Plans; Sht C12 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add Fire Code Official approval block to this sheet.
[Plans; Sht C13 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add Note: "Min 10ft of straight pipe required prior to entering separator."
[Plans; Sht C13 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Show and callout shutoff valve within 10ft downstream of the separator.
[Plans; Sht C13 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide sizing calculations and include in the Storm Report.
[Plans; Sht C13 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Show proposed vent location.
[Plans; Sht C13 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add Note: "Min 10ft of straight pipe required prior to entering interceptor."
[Plans; Sht C13 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Please locate in upper right corner.
[Plans; Sht C13 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add Fire Code Official approval block to this sheet.
[Plans; Sht C13 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout new pipe runs (Typ.).
[Plans; Sht C13 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Note to Engr: Confirm whether the geotechnical engineer's recommended note contained in Terra Associates, Inc May 22nd, 2023 addendum should be included on the civil drawings.
[Plans; Sheet C14 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Please locate in upper right corner.
[Plans; Sht C14 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Use current Stormwater Notes (see City Stds Section 207).
[Plans; Sht C14 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Use current Water System Notes (see City Stds Section 304).
[Plans; Sht C14 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Use current Sanitary Sewer Notes (see City Stds Section 405).
[Plans; Sht C14 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Please locate in upper right corner.
[Plans; Sht C15 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add City Std Detail 02.05.02.
[Plans; Sheet C15 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Replace w/ Std Detail 06.01.01. [Plans; Sheet C15 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Please locate in upper right corner.
[Plans; Sht C16 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide dimensional info for these sections.
[Plans; Sht C16 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Update all of these details to current standard.
[Plans; Sht C17 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Please locate in upper right corner.
[Plans; Sht C18 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Update noted details to current standard.
[Plans; Sht C18 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Remove this detail as it is not applicable to the project.
[Plans; Sht C18 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Please locate in upper right corner.
[Plans; Sht C19 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Replace this detail with current standard.
[Plans; Sht C19 of 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add Landscape-Utility clearance note here.
[Plans; Sht L1 of 10]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add Landscape-Utility clearance note here.
[Plans; Sht L2 of 10]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Relocate tree to provide min. clearance to water utility.
[Plans; Sht L2 of 10]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
See CSWWP review comments in the Storm Report.
[CSWWP; Pg 1 of 503]
|
|
Engineering Traffic Review
|
Failed
|
10/13/2023
|
10/17/2023
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
Per conditions of preliminary site plan, design team is required to submit a detailed sight distance analysis with civil permit submittal. For the 39th Ave SE access, sight distance analysis must show current standards are being met (ESD, SSD, object/eye height etc). Analysis will include horizontal + vertical exhibits that identifies future improvements, any sight obstructions, and extent of berm removal. Include exhibits within Civil plan set. Grading plan to include profile view of sight line to ensure compliance.
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
City of Puyallup is actively coordinating with Pierce Transit on the preferred location for the proposed bus shelter. Prior to resubmittal, please coordinate with the City to determine best location for the new bus shelter.
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Required sight distance analysis will evaluate any possible impacts associated with Type IIa landscaping. Identify new location of new monument sign in sight distance analysis. [Landscape L2]
|
|
Public Works Streets Review
|
Approved
|
10/13/2023
|
10/16/2023
|
|
|
|
|
Fire Review
|
Failed
|
10/13/2023
|
10/16/2023
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
1. Per pre-app notes PLPSP20220108: The current gravel path around the existing Lodge building "called out as asphalt on the plan" will be required to extend around the proposed addition to the Lodge. This will require the current path to be paved and extend to the entrance behind Lowes. This will be nonnegotiable as it will be utilized as a fire fighter access around the building. Path is labeled (New Fire Department access path) Path needs to be called out as asphalt. Gates will be accepted to keep tenants off the path if desired for safety and security.
|
|
Public Works Water Review
|
Failed
|
10/13/2023
|
10/13/2023
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Civil Sheet C12: Call out '3" x 12" tapping sleeve on existing main with 3" FlxMJ valve and concrete thrust blocking.' Tapping sleeve does not need to be stainless steel. Show gate valve on tapping sleeve.
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Civil Sheet C13: Presently there is a 4-inch tee with gate valve with a 4-inch ductile iron stub. There is not an existing 3-inch water meter and RPBA.
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Civil Sheet C13: Presently there is a 8-inch tee with gate valve with a 8-inch ductile iron stub. There is not an existing 8-inch DDCVA.
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Civil Sheet C13: Remove this comment. The water service will be installed to the south.
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Civil Sheet C13: Presently no 4-inch FDC exists.
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Civil Sheet C13: Remove this comment. This existing 12-inch bend will not be disturbed.
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Civil Sheet C13: These proposed 12-inch 22-degree bends should be able to be removed, if the required east / west water relocation is shifted further to the south.
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Civil Sheet C17: Remove this standard detail. It is not needed for this project.
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Civil Sheet C17: Remove this standard detail. There is no new 1.5-inch or 2-inch service for this project.
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Civil Sheet C18: Remove this detail. It will not be used in this project.
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Civil Sheet C18: Remove this detail. No fire hydrant will be touched in this project.
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Civil Sheet C12: The maximum hydrant run allowed is 20-feet. Call out an 8-inch tapping tee (stainless steel not required) on existing 12-inch DI with 8-inch gate valve and blocking. Install 80 LF of 8-inch DI. At the hydrant location call out an 8" Fl x 6" MJ tee with 8" MJ plug to west. 1-6" Fl x MJ GV. 2 LF of 6" DI and fire hydrant assembly per City Standards.
|
|
Engineering Storm Review
|
VOID
|
10/13/2023
|
10/09/2023
|
|
|
|
|
Planning Review
|
Failed
|
10/13/2023
|
10/06/2023
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Care center review cannot occur fully until land use and SEPA are complete. Previous early submittal waiver form only permitted submittal of civil and building permits for Brownstone building/site area. [Planning comment, sheet C1]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
PMC 20.58.005 (2)(ii) requires retaining walls to set back minimum of 6 feet with a maximum of 6 feet in height. The wall is located in the six foot setback area and some areas of the wall exceed 6 feet in height [Planning comment, sheet C5]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Wall near the brownstone structure is a cut wall (facing interior to site). PMC 20.58.005 (2)(ii) will not apply to this wall system. [Planning comment, sheet C6]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Some of these trees appear to be in a flat, ungraded area below the cut wall on sheet C6. Please submit an arborist tree risk assessment for possible retention. Arborist shall also assess trees in gas pipeline easement and provide limits of clearing recommendation for trees to be retained within easement area [planning comment, sheet C3]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide hydroperiod analysis for new dispersion of storm water run off into wetland c [planning comment, sheet C5]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
PMC 20.58.005 (2) requires a 6 foot landscape setback. The walkway and wall system appear to eliminate the buffer in this stretch. [Planning comment, sheet C5]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Consider adjusting wall interior to the site to retain existing trees in this area. Project arborist to review plan sheet and coordinate with design to determine feasibility of tree retention [Planning comment, sheet C6]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
PMC 20.58.005 (2) requires a 6 foot landscape setback. The walkway and wall system appear to eliminate the buffer in this stretch. [Planning comment, sheet L1]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Landscape island missing a tree. Please relocate civil utility and show required tree here [Planning comment, sheet L1]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Landscape island must include evergreen shrubs to provide 90 percent coverage [Planning comment, sheet L1]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Type IIa landscape required, 12 foot depth from back of walk.
Daffodils required in 12 foot setback yard area. See section 7.4 of the VMS and integrate into design and plant list on sheet L3.
Street trees required (class IV large street trees). Street trees proposed in sight distance areas are allowed and are required to be larger
cultivated nursery stock, with tall branching up the trunk from the nursery,
or with branching pruned at the time of installation to limit conflicts and
provide a clear zone below the tree canopy for the expected driver’s eye height per MUTCD standards (above 4 feet on trunk). Please specify on the size standards on sheet L3. [Planning comment sheet L2]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide coordination documentation from Pierce Transit (Tina Vaslet, bus stop planner) if the pad and shelter will be relocated [planning comment, sheet C3]
|
|
Public Works Collection Review
|
Approved
|
10/13/2023
|
09/11/2023
|
|
|
|
