Review Type
Outcome
Est. Completion Date
Completed
Engineering Civil Review
Approved
11/05/2024
10/15/2024
Reviewer:
Corrections:
Correction 1:
See Document Markup
Comments:
TMDL for Fecal on Clarks Creek.
[CSWPPP; Pg 94 of 96]
Correction 2:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Resolve per MH email to JMJ dated 9/25/24.
[Storm Report; Pg 9 of 124]
Correction 3:
See Document Markup
Comments:
These conventional paving areas are considered 'replaced hard surface areas'. Utility trenching for this project is part of the overall project scope (not standalone exempt utility work) and must be included in the project thresholds.
[Storm Report; Pg 10 of 124]
Correction 4:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Identify:
1) permeable paving area and square footage;
2) roof area tributary to detention and square footage;
3) bypass roof area and square footage;
4) conventional paving area and square footage;
5) square footage of landscape area.
[Storm Report; Pg 10 of 124]
Correction 5:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show this bypass area on the Proposed Coverage (basin?) exhibit.
[Storm Report; Pg 15 of 124]
Correction 6:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Clarify-It is unclear what portion of roof is affected and the amount of square footage.
[Storm Report; Pg 15 of 124]
Correction 7:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Revise-"from the paved areas" or something similar, since the roof runoff is being conveyed to the EcoRain system.
[Storm Report; Pg 17 of 124]
Correction 8:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add-"from the primary drive aisles on the south and east sides of the project".
[Storm Report; Pg 17 of 124]
Correction 9:
See Document Markup
Comments:
It appears that the utility trenching and concrete pavement replacement is not included as run-on to the permeable pavement or within the Bypass basin?
[Storm Report; Pg 41 of 124]
Correction 10:
See Document Markup
Comments:
It appears that this quantity does not include the utility trenching and concrete pavement replacement.
[Storm Report; Pg 43 of 124]
Correction 11:
See Document Markup
Comments:
FYI only...orifice located below top of outlet pipe.
[Storm Report; Pg 46 of 124]
Correction 12:
See Document Markup
Comments:
It appears that the utility trenching and concrete pavement replacement is not included as run-on to the permeable pavement or within the Bypass basin?
[Storm Report; Pg 62 of 124]
Correction 13:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Remove engineering approval block.
[Landscape Plan; Sheet L-01]
Correction 14:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Revise-"NGVD29+3.48".
[Plans; Sheet C1-301]
Correction 15:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Based on the approximate disturbed areas noted:
Building and Parking = 48,105sf
Grass Area = 9,825sf
Asphalt Trenching = 3,387sf
Concrete Replace = 2,996sf
Total Area Disturbed = 64,313sf
Correction 16:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Based on the approximate disturbed areas noted:
Replaced Hard Surface = 54,488sf
Replaced PGHS = 45,656sf
Correction 17:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Please revise to read: "10ft (min) - 15ft (max)".
[Plans; Sheet C3-101]
Correction 18:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-Type I called out on C4-103.
[Plans; Sheet C4-101]
Correction 19:
See Document Markup
Comments:
As mentioned on the prior review, it appears that the permeable pavement section will overflow at the SE corner, which is the low point, before Detail C/C4-202 goes into overflow (El. 37.01 vs El. 37.09.) Also, see MHigginson email dated 9-26-24.
[Plans; Sheet C4-101]
Correction 20:
See Document Markup
Comments:
"DI" .
[Plans; Sheet C4-101]
Correction 21:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add-"Control Structure" and callout solid lid.
[Plans; Sheet C4-102]
Correction 22:
See Document Markup
Comments:
10in on plan view.
[Plans; Sheet C4-102]
Correction 23:
See Document Markup
Comments:
City Stds requires 1ft min cover (1in is specified here). Revise pipe slope and/or depth as necessary.
[Plans; Sheet C4-102]
Correction 24:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per prior comment-Provide pipe info on profile also.
[Plans; Sheet C4-102]
Correction 25:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Revise inlet as necessary to provide min. cover.
[Plans; Sheet C4-102]
Correction 26:
See Document Markup
Comments:
See comments on profile.
[Plans; Sheet C4-102]
Correction 27:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-In?
[Plans; Sheet C4-103]
Correction 28:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Match IE (per standards) w/ exist'g...IE 34.31.
[Plans; Sheet C4-103]
Correction 29:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Revise.
[Plans; Sheet C4-103]
Correction 30:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-In?
[Plans; Sheet C4-103]
Correction 31:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Match IE (per standards) w/ exist'g...IE 34.31.
[Plans; Sheet C4-103]
Correction 32:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-Type II called out on C4-101. If Type II, callout diameter and lid type on this plan also.
[Plans; Sheet C4-103]
Correction 33:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout solid lid.
[Plans; Sheet C4-103]
Correction 34:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout solid lid.
[Plans; Sheet C4-103]
Correction 35:
See Document Markup
Comments:
See comments on plan above.
[Plans; Sheet C4-103]
Correction 36:
See Document Markup
Comments:
See comments on plan above.
[Plans; Sheet C4-103]
Correction 37:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Revise per comments above.
[Plans; Sheet C4-103]
Correction 38:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Please callout a min. of 5in below the underdrain for clarity...(Ecology only recognizes the depth below the perforations of the underdrain for storage within the reservoir course.)
[Plans; Sheet C4-202]
Correction 39:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per conversation with Justin on 9/26, by the time the reservoir course is in overflow (El. 37.09 per detail), water is already spilling out at the SE corner of the project (El. 37.01). As an option, see example right and comments on Sht C4-101.
[Plans; Sheet C4-202]
Correction 40:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per conversation with Justin on 9/26, does this design allow the 6in overflow drain to keep up when the entire perm pavement area goes into overflow? See example right and comments on Sht C4-101.
[Plans; Sheet C4-202]
Correction 41:
See Document Markup
Comments:
FYI only...orifice located below top of outlet pipe.
[Plans; Sheet C4-202]
Correction 42:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Clarify?
[Plans; Sheet C5-102]
Correction 43:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Clarify?
[Plans; Sheet C5-103]
Correction 44:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per prior comment-Callout Sampling Connection per Std Detail 04.03.04.
[Plans; Sheet C5-104]
Correction 45:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Adjust slope to provide 0.1ft drop across structure per standards.
[Plans; Sheet C5-105]
Correction 46:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per prior comment-Ref Standard Detail 04.03.04 on Sheet C5-201.
[Plans; Sheet C5-105]
Correction 47:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Please add dimension btwn FDC and FH to read: "10ft (min) - 15ft (max)".
[Plans; Sheet C6-101]
Correction 48:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Please show GV symbols on plan.
[Plans; Sheet C6-102]
Correction 49:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per prior comment: Add-thrust block.
[Plans; Sheet C6-103]
Correction 50:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Please show GV symbols on plan.
[Plans; Sheet C6-103]
Correction 51:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per prior comment: Add-thrust block.
[Plans; Sheet C6-104]
Correction 52:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Please show GV symbols on plan.
[Plans; Sheet C6-105]
Correction 53:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per prior comment-Add reference to alignment on Sheet C6-104.
[Plans; Sheet C6-105]
Correction 54:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Please show GV symbols on plan.
[Plans; Sheet C6-106]
Correction 55:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout 10ft min to 15ft max distance btwn FDC and FH.
[Plans; Sheet C6-106]
Correction 56:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add City Standard Details:
03.02.01-2 // 03.02.01-3 // 03.10.03 // 03.11.01.
[Plans; Sheet C6-202]
Fire Review
Approved
11/05/2024
10/15/2024
Reviewer:
Public Works Water Review
Approved
11/05/2024
10/11/2024
Reviewer:
Corrections:
Correction 1:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil C2-302: There is an existing domestic sample station that will be abandoned, and will need to be added to the new construction.
Engineering Storm Review
VOID
11/05/2024
10/08/2024
Reviewer:
Public Works Streets Review
VOID
11/05/2024
10/08/2024
Reviewer:
Public Works Collection Review
VOID
11/05/2024
10/08/2024
Reviewer:
Engineering Traffic Review
VOID
11/05/2024
10/08/2024
Reviewer:
Planning Review
Approved
11/05/2024
10/08/2024
Reviewer:
Engineering Civil Review
Failed
10/22/2024
10/02/2024
Reviewer:
Corrections:
Correction 1:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide a small-scale PIT test to determine infiltration feasibility. [geotech, pg 17]
Correction 2:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide continuous groundwater monitoring data during the wet season (December 21st- April 1st) [geotech, pg 27]
Correction 3:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide conversion to NAVD 88 Datum. [civils, pg 1]
Correction 4:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add the infiltration testing report to the geotech report document. It's not intuitive to look in the drainage report for geotechnical testing. [drainage report, pg 17]
Correction 5:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add that this is sheet C1-201. [civils, pg 6]
Correction 6:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide a detail for the proposed swale. [civils, pg 9]
Correction 7:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide a detail for the proposed baffle tank. [civils, pg 10]
Correction 8:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show utility hatch that this line is to be removed. [civils, pg 12]
Correction 9:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show proposed concrete in darker hatch. [civils, pg 15]
Correction 10:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Replace with city standard flow control manhole 02.01.06 or 02.01.07 and provide orifices and elevations. [civils, pg 19]
Correction 11:
See Document Markup
Comments:
-Provide EcoRain manufacturer's literature and include in the storm report. Information should include at a minimum:
1) storage volume per unit;
2) cleanout/maintenance and inspection port req'ts;
3) O&M req'ts
4) geotextile req'ts;
5) construction req'ts (excavation, backfill, cover, ventilation, etc.)
[Storm Report; Pg 1 of 62]
Correction 12:
See Document Markup
Comments:
-Provide grease interceptor calculations and include in the storm report as an appendix.
[Storm Report; Pg 1 of 62]
Correction 13:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify- TPN 0420331121.
[Storm Report; Pg 8 of 62]
Correction 14:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Please revise to "vacated 5th Street SE".
[Storm Report; Pg 8 of 62]
Correction 15:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide basin exhibits indicating the Existing Conditions and Proposed Conditions outlined in the table.
[Storm Report; Pg 8 of 62]
Correction 16:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Clarify-Sheet C2-301 indicates approximately 63,965sf of disturbed area.
[Storm Report; Pg 8 of 62]
Correction 17:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Clarify-Sheet C2-301 indicates approximately 54,100sf of hard surface area.
[Storm Report; Pg 8 of 62]
Correction 18:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Clarify-per the List Approach, Footnote 2, pavement (when proposed) must be permeable to the extent feasible. Why is the replaced concrete pavement not permeable?
[Storm Report; Pg 8 of 62]
Correction 19:
See Document Markup
Comments:
See comment(s) on the Area Coverage Table below.
[Storm Report; Pg 8 of 62]
Correction 20:
See Document Markup
Comments:
See comment(s) on the Area Coverage Table on Page 8 of 62.
[Storm Report; Pg 9 of 62]
Correction 21:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Please revise to "vacated 5th Street SE".
[Storm Report; Pg 10 of 62]
Correction 22:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide evidence of wet-season (Dec 1 thru Apr 1) high groundwater elevation as required by the Ecology Manual. If project timelines do not allow wet-season monitoring prior to anticipated start of construction, provide a financial security (Assignment-of-funds or Bond) in the amount of $7,500.00 that guarantees monitoring during the upcoming wet-season.
[Storm Report; Pg 10 of 62]
Correction 23:
See Document Markup
Comments:
FYI Only-permeable pavement could be found to be infeasible (if desired) since the proposed project will be replacing existing impervious surfaces. Per Ecology infeasibility criteria: "Where replacing existing impervious surfaces, unless the existing surface is a non-pollution generating surface over outwash soil with a measured initial saturated infiltration rate of 4 inches per hour or greater."
[Storm Report; Pg 11 of 62]
Correction 24:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Clarify-cannot find this in the WWHM calculations. In addition, Ecology does not recommend run-on from up-gradient PGIS without conditions.
[Storm Report; Pg 12 of 62]
Correction 25:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Clarify-per the List Approach, Footnote 2, pavement (when proposed) must be permeable to the extent feasible. Why is the replaced concrete pavement not permeable?
[Storm Report; Pg 13 of 62]
Correction 26:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Clarify-how does the Fair prevent the NPGHS area from being accessed by motor vehicles and creating a pollution generating surface?
[Storm Report; Pg 13 of 62]
Correction 27:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Is there a reason the sand layer does not extend to the perimeter of the permeable pavement section...particularly due to the run-on from the upgradient PGHS area.
[Storm Report; Pg 13 of 62]
Correction 28:
See Document Markup
Comments:
"Vault" or "facility"?
[Storm Report; Pg 15 of 62]
Correction 29:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-acre feet?
[Storm Report; Pg 15 of 62]
Correction 30:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Clarify-what was the date of the PIT testing? City Standards require wet season testing.
[Storm Report; Pg 20 of 62]
Correction 31:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Clarify:
Total Disturbed Area = 60,635sf = 1.39ac
Less Building Roof = 14,460sf = <0.332ac>
Less Permeable AC Pvmt = 29,359sf = <.674ac>
Less Vegetation Area = 9,770sf = <0.22ac>
Remaining Balance Not Accounted for = 0.164ac (7,144sf)...
...which appears to be the replaced impervious concrete pavement (Detail C/C3-301), is pollution generating, and must comply with MR5, MR6, and MR7.
[Storm Report; Pg 39 of 62]
Correction 32:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-Section B/C3-301 indicates 3 inch wearing course.
[Storm Report; Pg 43 of 62]
Correction 33:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide supporting structural calculations confirming the proposed permeable pavement cross-section will support HS-20 loading (min).
[Storm Report; Pg 43 of 62]
Correction 34:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-Per Ecology BMP T5.15, typical void space for the wearing course is 16%-25%.
[Storm Report; Pg 43 of 62]
Correction 35:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-Section MR5, Permeable Pavement states there is a 1-acre lateral flow basin tributary to the permeable pavement.
[Storm Report; Pg 57 of 62]
Correction 36:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Include geotechnical study in the Storm Report.
[Geotechnical Study; Pg 1 of 37]
Correction 37:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide wet-season (Dec 1 thru Apr 1) high groundwater elevation as required by the Ecology Manual. If project timelines do not allow wet-season monitoring prior to anticipated start of construction, provide a financial security (Assignment-of-funds or Bond) in the amount of $7,500.00 that guarantees monitoring during the upcoming wet-season.
[Geotechnical Study; Pg 1 of 37]
Correction 38:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per City Standards, Section 1.8(4), plans shall be based on the NAVD88 datum. Per conversation with JMJ (Justin), elevations will be corrected on the Record Drawings.
[Plans; Sheet C1-001]
Correction 39:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use current City Standard Stormwater Notes. See City Standardss, Section 207.
[Plans; Sheet C1-002]
Correction 40:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Also include City Standard Section 406 Testing Requirements.
[Plans; Sheet C1-002]
Correction 41:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Also include City Standard Section 209 Testing and Inspection.
[Plans; Sheet C1-002]
Correction 42:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Reorient sheet to read correctly.
[Plans; Sheet C1-201]
Correction 43:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per City Standards, Section 1.8(4), plans shall be based on the NAVD88 datum. Per conversation with JMJ (Justin), elevations will be corrected on the Record Drawings.
[Plans; Sheet C1-202]
Correction 44:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-CN 1.
[Plans; Sheet C2-101
Correction 45:
See Document Markup
Comments:
See comment in Storm Report, Page 8 of 62.
[Plans; Sheet C2-301]
Correction 46:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Clarify-what is happening with the existing storm line here.
[Plans; Sheet C2-302]
Correction 47:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Clarify this shaded area.
[Plans; Sheet C2-304]
Correction 48:
See Document Markup
Comments:
DDCVA.
[Plans; Sheet C3-101]
Correction 49:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout 10ft (min) - 15ft (max) separation btwn FH and FDC.
[Plans; Sheet C3-101]
Correction 50:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Hilite the location of the geotextile (sim to Details D and E below. Also, on the sand layer side.
[Plans; Sheet C3-301]
Correction 51:
See Document Markup
Comments:
POROUS PAVEMENT SUBGRADE PREPARATION NOTES??????? ???????? ??????? ?? ?????? ????????? ???? ??? ??????? ?? ?? ?????????
2.Prepare the subgrade in accordance with the geotechnical engineer’s requirements and the following:???????????? ?? ????? ???????? ????? ????? ??????????? ????? ?? ??????? ????????? ?????????? ?? ?????????? ??? ?????????? ??? ???????? ?? ?? ???????????? ???????? ????????? ??????????? ?? ???????? ????? ??? ????? ???????? ?? ?????? ???? ????? ???????????
4.Grading to final subgrade elevation shall be completed by machinery operation on the intermediate subgrade level or outside of the porous fill/pavement prism.????? ?????????? ????? ????? ??? ???? ?? ?? ??? ?? ?????????? ?? ?????? ??????? ??? ????????? ?????? ?? ?? ????????? ??? ????????? ?? ?????? ?? ?????? ??? ????? ???????? ?? ? ??????? ????? ??? ?????????? ????? ??????? ??? ???????? ???? ??????????????? ?? ??????? ????? ??????? ?? ????? ??????? ??????????? ???????? ?? ??? ???????????? ???????? ??? ?????
6.Areas determined to be overly compacted in the opinion of the Engineer, Geotechnical Engineer, or City, shall be scarified by the contractor to a depth agreed upon by the Engineer, Geotechnical Engineer, and City.??????? ?? ????????? ????? ?????????? ?????? ?????????? ?? ????? ????? ?? ?????????????? ?? ???? ??????? ??? ???????? ???? ?????????? ??? ????????? ????????
8.Approved porous fill materials shall be back-dumped onto the subgrade from the edge of the installation and pushed out onto the subgrade.???????? ????? ???? ????????? ?????????? ????? ?? ??? ?? ??? ?????????? ????????????? ???????? ?? ??? ???????????? ???????????
10.Final compaction shall be verified by the Geotechnical Engineer. ??????? ????? ???? ?
Correction 52:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Please add the following notes:
Correction 53:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Clarify-per the List Approach, Footnote 2, pavement (when proposed) must be permeable to the extent feasible. Why is the replaced concrete pavement not permeable?
[Plans; Sheet C4-101]
Correction 54:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Is there a reason the sand layer does not extend to the perimeter of the permeable pavement section...particularly due to the run-on from the upgradient PGHS area.
[Plans; Sheet C4-101]
Correction 55:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Clarify-how does the Fair prevent the NPGHS area from being accessed by motor vehicles and creating a pollution generating surface?
[Plans; Sheet C4-101]
Correction 56:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Please add-"See Porous Pavement Subgrade Preparation Notes on Sheet C3-301."
[Plans; Sheet C4-101]
Correction 57:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout pipe info (mat'l, slope, length).
[Plans; Sheet C4-101]
Correction 58:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide cleanout and callout Rim and IE.
[Plans; Sheet C4-101]
Correction 59:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Clarify-what is happening with the existing storm line here.
[Plans; Sheet C4-101]
Correction 60:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide inspection ports in accordance with City Standards 202.2(3)c.
[Plans; Sheet C4-101]
Correction 61:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide cross-section through this area; provide check dam detail; provide overflow detail and identify location in the section.
[Plans; Sheet C4-101]
Correction 62:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide cleanout at tee.
[Plans; Sheet C4-101]
Correction 63:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-IE places the top of pipe into the wearing course.
[Plans; Sheet C4-101]
Correction 64:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Is an overflow (low points) warranted along these perimeters?
[Plans; Sheet C4-101]
Correction 65:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Ductile Iron due to shallow bury.
[Plans; Sheet C4-101]
Correction 66:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout Rim and IE.
[Plans; Sheet C4-101]
Correction 67:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide pipe info.
[Plans; Sheet C4-101]
Correction 68:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide EcoRain manufacturer's literature and include in the storm report. See comments in the storm report.
[Plans; Sheet C4-101]
Correction 69:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide cross-section thru the facility and include the following info:
-Surface elevation
-Top of tank elevation
-Bottom of tank elevation
-Subgrade elevation
-Sediment storage
-2yr water elevation
-10yr water elevation
-excavation wrap (if required)
-Synthetic impermeable liner 30mil UV resistant (due to groundwater elevation)
-backfill dimensions all around
[Plans; Sheet C4-101]
Correction 70:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-are vents required for this system?
[Plans; Sheet C4-101]
Correction 71:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Identify control structure. Min. control structure per Standards is 54-inch. Revise accordingly.
[Plans; Sheet C4-101]
Correction 72:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use either Standard Detail 02.01.06 or 02.01.07. Callout riser elevations on chosen detail.
[Plans; Sheet C4-101]
Correction 73:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide pipe info.
[Plans; Sheet C4-101]
Correction 74:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout pipe IE at tank.
[Plans; Sheet C4-101]
Correction 75:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout pipe IE at tank.
[Plans; Sheet C4-101]
Correction 76:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout Rim and IE info.
[Plans; Sheet C4-101]
Correction 77:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout Rim and IE info.
[Plans; Sheet C4-101]
Correction 78:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Please add-"See Storm Alignment A on Sheet C4-102."
[Plans; Sheet C4-101]
Correction 79:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout pipe mat'l, length and slope.
[Plans; Sheet C4-101]
Correction 80:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per the Storm Report, Page 10 of 62, the elevation of the groundwater at time of testing (not wet-season high) was El. 33.9 which places the Ecorain units in the groundwater. Provide a manufactured impermeable synthetic liner to prevent groundwater intrusion into the detention facility. Callout the synthetic liner requirements (min. 30mil ultraviolet (UV) light resistant) and show on the Ecorain details. In addition, provide buoyancy verification (calculations and/or certification letter).
[Plans; Sheet C4-102]
Correction 81:
See Document Markup
Comments:
North Arrow is aligned incorrectly.
[Plans; Sheet C4-102]
Correction 82:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide cleanout and callout Rim and IE.
[Plans; Sheet C4-102]
Correction 83:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide cleanout at tee.
[Plans; Sheet C4-102]
Correction 84:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout pipe length, mat'l, and slope.
[Plans; Sheet C4-102]
Correction 85:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout CB info (type, rim and IE).
[Plans; Sheet C4-102]
Correction 86:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide pipe info.
[Plans; Sheet C4-102]
Correction 87:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout to provide 1ft min depth of cover at edge of pavement.
[Plans; Sheet C4-102]
Correction 88:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Identify control structure. Min. control structure per Standards is 54-inch. Revise accordingly.
[Plans; Sheet C4-102]
Correction 89:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use either Standard Detail 02.01.06 or 02.01.07. Callout riser elevations on chosen detail.
[Plans; Sheet C4-102]
Correction 90:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify callout (existing CB).
[Plans; Sheet C4-102]
Correction 91:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Identify control structure. Min. control structure per Standards is 54-inch. Revise accordingly.
[Plans; Sheet C4-102]
Correction 92:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add City Standard Details:
02.01.05 // 02.01.06 or 02.01.07 // 02.01.08 // 02.01.10
[Plans; Sheet C4-201]
Correction 93:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout control riser information (orifice size, elevations, diameter) on Detail 02.01.06 or 02.01.07, or in a separate table.
[Plans; Sheet C4-201]
Correction 94:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use Standard Detail 04.03.04 on Sheet C5-201.
[Plans; Sheet C5-101]
Correction 95:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per City Standards, provide pipe info (mat'l, slope, length) on this plan sheet also.
[Plans; Sheet C5-101]
Correction 96:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per City Standards, callout structure and cleanout info (rim, IEs, size) on this plan sheet also.
[Plans; Sheet C5-101]
Correction 97:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-this is the only run of PVC between SSMH1 and SSMH6. Is there a reason that all of the other runs are DI? It appears there is adequate cover.
[Plans; Sheet C5-101]
Correction 98:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use Standard Detail 04.03.04 on Sheet C5-201.
[Plans; Sheet C5-102]
Correction 99:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify callout (2?).
[Plans; Sheet C5-102]
Correction 100:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify callout (2?).
[Plans; Sheet C5-102]
Correction 101:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use Standard Detail 04.03.04 on Sheet C5-201.
[Plans; Sheet C5-103]
Correction 102:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify callout (2?).
[Plans; Sheet C5-103]
Correction 103:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify callout (2?).
[Plans; Sheet C5-103]
Correction 104:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify callout (2?).
[Plans; Sheet C5-103]
Correction 105:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-"In"?
[Plans; Sheet C5-103]
Correction 106:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use Standard Detail 04.03.04 on Sheet C5-201.
[Plans; Sheet C5-104]
Correction 107:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout the 10ft min separation on this sheet too.
[Plans; Sheet C5-104]
Correction 108:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout GI Rim elev.
[Plans; Sheet C5-104]
Correction 109:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show alignment and outlet location of the GI vent. Callout the elevation of the vent outlet.
[Plans; Sheet C5-104]
Correction 110:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout Sampling Connection per Std Detail 04.03.04.
[Plans; Sheet C5-104]
Correction 111:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use Standard Detail 04.03.04 on Sheet C5-201.
[Plans; Sheet C5-105]
Correction 112:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-Sheet C5-102?
[Plans; Sheet C5-105]
Correction 113:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use 6in side sewer per standards.
[Plans; Sheet C5-105]
Correction 114:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout SE IE.
[Plans; Sheet C5-105]
Correction 115:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout Exist'g pipe info.
[Plans; Sheet C5-105]
Correction 116:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout SE IE.
[Plans; Sheet C5-105]
Correction 117:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use 6in side sewer per standards.
[Plans; Sheet C5-105]
Correction 118:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Clarify-is there a reason to use min. slope at this pipe run?
[Plans; Sheet C5-105]
Correction 119:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show alignment and outlet location of the GI vent. Callout the elevation of the vent outlet.
[Plans; Sheet C5-105]
Correction 120:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout GI Rim elev.
[Plans; Sheet C5-105]
Correction 121:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add City Standard Details:
04.03.04 // 04.03.05
[Plans; Sheet C5-201]
Correction 122:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add Fire Code approval block per City Standards, Section 1.4.
[Plans; Sheet C6-101]
Correction 123:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Revise to DDCVA.
[Plans; Sheet C6-101]
Correction 124:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout connection details (valve, fitting,thrust block, etc).
[Plans; Sheet C6-101]
Correction 125:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout connection details (valve, fitting,thrust block, etc).
[Plans; Sheet C6-101]
Correction 126:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per City Standards, provide pipe info (size, mat'l, fittings, valves, thrust blocks, etc.) on this plan sheet also.
[Plans; Sheet C6-101]
Correction 127:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout fitting info (type, fitting, thrust block, etc).
[Plans; Sheet C6-101]
Correction 128:
See Document Markup
Comments:
FYI-Pipe info does not agree w Sht C6-103.
[Plans; Sheet C6-101]
Correction 129:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout 3ft min. clear zone.
[Plans; Sheet C6-101]
Correction 130:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-pipe size (6in?).
[Plans; Sheet C6-101]
Correction 131:
See Document Markup
Comments:
FYI-Pipe info does not agree w Sht C6-103.
[Plans; Sheet C6-101]
Correction 132:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout connection details (valve, fitting, thrust block, etc).
[Plans; Sheet C6-101]
Correction 133:
See Document Markup
Comments:
FYI-Pipe slope does not agree w Sht C6-103.
[Plans; Sheet C6-101]
Correction 134:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout fitting info (type, fitting, valve, thrust block, etc).
[Plans; Sheet C6-101]
Correction 135:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout fitting info (type, fitting, thrust block, etc).
[Plans; Sheet C6-101]
Correction 136:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add reference to alignment on Sheet C6-103.
[Plans; Sheet C6-101]
Correction 137:
See Document Markup
Comments:
FYI-Pipe slope does not agree w Sht C6-102.
[Plans; Sheet C6-101]
Correction 138:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-pipe size (6in?).
[Plans; Sheet C6-101]
Correction 139:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add reference to alignment on Sheet C6-102.
[Plans; Sheet C6-101]
Correction 140:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add reference to alignment on Sheet C6-105.
[Plans; Sheet C6-101]
Correction 141:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout fitting info (type, fitting, valve, thrust block, etc).
[Plans; Sheet C6-101]
Correction 142:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout fitting info (type, fitting, valve, thrust block, etc).
[Plans; Sheet C6-101]
Correction 143:
See Document Markup
Comments:
FYI-Pipe slope does not agree w Sht C6-102.
[Plans; Sheet C6-101]
Correction 144:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout fitting info (type, fitting, valves, thrust block, etc).
[Plans; Sheet C6-101]
Correction 145:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add reference to alignment on Sheet C6-106.
[Plans; Sheet C6-101]
Correction 146:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout fitting info (type, fitting, thrust block, etc).
[Plans; Sheet C6-101]
Correction 147:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout fitting info (type, fitting, thrust block, etc).
[Plans; Sheet C6-101]
Correction 148:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout fitting info (type, fitting, thrust block, etc).
[Plans; Sheet C6-101]
Correction 149:
See Document Markup
Comments:
FYI-Pipe slope does not agree w Sht C6-102.
[Plans; Sheet C6-101]
Correction 150:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add reference to alignment on Sheet C6-104.
[Plans; Sheet C6-101]
Correction 151:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add reference to alignment on Sheet C6-102.
[Plans; Sheet C6-101]
Correction 152:
See Document Markup
Comments:
FYI-Pipe info does not agree w Sht C6-105.
[Plans; Sheet C6-101]
Correction 153:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-pipe size (6in?).
[Plans; Sheet C6-101]
Correction 154:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout fitting info (type, fitting, valve, thrust block, etc).
[Plans; Sheet C6-101]
Correction 155:
See Document Markup
Comments:
FYI-Pipe info does not agree w Sht C6-106.
[Plans; Sheet C6-101]
Correction 156:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout fitting info (type, fitting, thrust block, etc).
[Plans; Sheet C6-101]
Correction 157:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout fitting info (type, fitting, thrust block, etc).
[Plans; Sheet C6-101]
Correction 158:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add Fire Code approval block per City Standards, Section 1.4.
[Plans; Sheet C6-201]
Correction 159:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-sheets out of sequence with the planset.
[Plans; Sheet C6-201]
Correction 160:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add Fire Code approval block per City Standards, Section 1.4.
[Plans; Sheet C6-202]
Correction 161:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-sheets out of sequence with the planset.
[Plans; Sheet C6-202]
Correction 162:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add City Standard Details:
03.01.01 // 03.02.01-1 // 03.02.01-2 // 03.02.01-3 // 03.03.03 // 03.04.03 (if applicable) // 03.08.01 // 03.10.03 // 03.11.01.
[Plans; Sheet C6-202]
Correction 163:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-sheets out of sequence with the planset.
[Plans; Sheet C7-101]
Correction 164:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add Fire Code approval block per City Standards, Section 1.4.
[Plans; Sheet C6-102]
Correction 165:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add reference to alignment on Sheet C6-103.
[Plans; Sheet C6-102]
Correction 166:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout hydrant run info and show GV on this sheet too.
[Plans; Sheet C6-102]
Correction 167:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout pipe mat'l.
[Plans; Sheet C6-102]
Correction 168:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add reference to alignment on Sheet C6-105.
[Plans; Sheet C6-102]
Correction 169:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add reference to alignment on Sheet C6-106.
[Plans; Sheet C6-102]
Correction 170:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout 4in alignment info (pipe mat'l, length, fittings, valves, thrust blocks, etc.).
[Plans; Sheet C6-102]
Correction 171:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout RPBA.
[Plans; Sheet C6-102]
Correction 172:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add reference to alignment on Sheet C6-104.
[Plans; Sheet C6-102]
Correction 173:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add Fire Code approval block per City Standards, Section 1.4.
[Plans; Sheet C6-103]
Correction 174:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add-thrust block.
[Plans; Sheet C6-103]
Correction 175:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout hydrant run info and show GV on this sheet too.
[Plans; Sheet C6-103]
Correction 176:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show GV.
[Plans; Sheet C6-103]
Correction 177:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add reference to alignment on Sheet C6-102.
[Plans; Sheet C6-103]
Correction 178:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add Fire Code approval block per City Standards, Section 1.4.
[Plans; Sheet C6-104]
Correction 179:
See Document Markup
Comments:
City Standards require ductile iron. Revise accordingly.
[Plans; Sheet C6-104]
Correction 180:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add reference to alignment on Sheet C6-102.
[Plans; Sheet C6-104]
Correction 181:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add-thrust block.
[Plans; Sheet C6-104]
Correction 182:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add reference to alignment on Sheet C6-105.
[Plans; Sheet C6-104]
Correction 183:
See Document Markup
Comments:
City Standards require ductile iron. Revise accordingly.
[Plans; Sheet C6-104]
Correction 184:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add Fire Code approval block per City Standards, Section 1.4.
[Plans; Sheet C6-105]
Correction 185:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add reference to alignment on Sheet C6-104.
[Plans; Sheet C6-105]
Correction 186:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add reference to alignment on Sheet C6-102.
[Plans; Sheet C6-105]
Correction 187:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout hydrant run info and show GV on this sheet too.
[Plans; Sheet C6-105]
Correction 188:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add Fire Code approval block per City Standards, Section 1.4.
[Plans; Sheet C6-106]
Correction 189:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add reference to alignment on Sheet C6-102.
[Plans; Sheet C6-106]
Correction 190:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout hydrant run info and show GV on this sheet too.
[Plans; Sheet C6-106]
Correction 191:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout 10ft min to 15ft max distance btwn FDC and FH.
[Plans; Sheet C6-106]
Correction 192:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout fitting info (type, fitting, thrust block, etc).
[Plans; Sheet C6-106]
Correction 193:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout thrust block.
[Plans; Sheet C6-106]
Correction 194:
See Document Markup
Comments:
TMDL for Fecal on Clarks Creek.
[CSWPPP; Pg 4 of 94]
Correction 195:
See Document Markup
Comments:
TMDL for Fecal on Clarks Creek.
[CSWPPP; Pg 25 of 94]
Correction 196:
See Document Markup
Comments:
TMDL for Fecal on Clarks Creek.
[CSWPPP; Pg 28 of 94]
Correction 197:
See Document Markup
Comments:
TMDL for Fecal on Clarks Creek.
[CSWPPP; Pg 92 of 94]
Correction 198:
See Document Markup
Comments:
TMDL for Fecal on Clarks Creek.
[CSWPPP; Pg 94 of 96]
Correction 199:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Resolve per MH email to JMJ dated 9/25/24.
[Storm Report; Pg 9 of 124]
Correction 200:
See Document Markup
Comments:
These conventional paving areas are considered 'replaced hard surface areas'. Utility trenching for this project is part of the overall project scope (not standalone exempt utility work) and must be included in the project thresholds.
[Storm Report; Pg 10 of 124]
Correction 201:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Identify:
1) permeable paving area and square footage;
2) roof area tributary to detention and square footage;
3) bypass roof area and square footage;
4) conventional paving area and square footage;
5) square footage of landscape area.
[Storm Report; Pg 10 of 124]
Correction 202:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show this bypass area on the Proposed Coverage (basin?) exhibit.
[Storm Report; Pg 15 of 124]
Correction 203:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Clarify-It is unclear what portion of roof is affected and the amount of square footage.
[Storm Report; Pg 15 of 124]
Correction 204:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Revise-"from the paved areas" or something similar, since the roof runoff is being conveyed to the EcoRain system.
[Storm Report; Pg 17 of 124]
Correction 205:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add-"from the primary drive aisles on the south and east sides of the project".
[Storm Report; Pg 17 of 124]
Correction 206:
See Document Markup
Comments:
It appears that the utility trenching and concrete pavement replacement is not included as run-on to the permeable pavement or within the Bypass basin?
[Storm Report; Pg 41 of 124]
Correction 207:
See Document Markup
Comments:
It appears that this quantity does not include the utility trenching and concrete pavement replacement.
[Storm Report; Pg 43 of 124]
Correction 208:
See Document Markup
Comments:
FYI only...orifice located below top of outlet pipe.
[Storm Report; Pg 46 of 124]
Correction 209:
See Document Markup
Comments:
It appears that the utility trenching and concrete pavement replacement is not included as run-on to the permeable pavement or within the Bypass basin?
[Storm Report; Pg 62 of 124]
Correction 210:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Remove engineering approval block.
[Landscape Plan; Sheet L-01]
Correction 211:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Revise-"NGVD29+3.48".
[Plans; Sheet C1-301]
Correction 212:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Based on the approximate disturbed areas noted:
Building and Parking = 48,105sf
Grass Area = 9,825sf
Asphalt Trenching = 3,387sf
Concrete Replace = 2,996sf
Total Area Disturbed = 64,313sf
Correction 213:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Based on the approximate disturbed areas noted:
Replaced Hard Surface = 54,488sf
Replaced PGHS = 45,656sf
Correction 214:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Please revise to read: "10ft (min) - 15ft (max)".
[Plans; Sheet C3-101]
Correction 215:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-Type I called out on C4-103.
[Plans; Sheet C4-101]
Correction 216:
See Document Markup
Comments:
As mentioned on the prior review, it appears that the permeable pavement section will overflow at the SE corner, which is the low point, before Detail C/C4-202 goes into overflow (El. 37.01 vs El. 37.09.) Also, see MHigginson email dated 9-26-24.
[Plans; Sheet C4-101]
Correction 217:
See Document Markup
Comments:
"DI" .
[Plans; Sheet C4-101]
Correction 218:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add-"Control Structure" and callout solid lid.
[Plans; Sheet C4-102]
Correction 219:
See Document Markup
Comments:
10in on plan view.
[Plans; Sheet C4-102]
Correction 220:
See Document Markup
Comments:
City Stds requires 1ft min cover (1in is specified here). Revise pipe slope and/or depth as necessary.
[Plans; Sheet C4-102]
Correction 221:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per prior comment-Provide pipe info on profile also.
[Plans; Sheet C4-102]
Correction 222:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Revise inlet as necessary to provide min. cover.
[Plans; Sheet C4-102]
Correction 223:
See Document Markup
Comments:
See comments on profile.
[Plans; Sheet C4-102]
Correction 224:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-In?
[Plans; Sheet C4-103]
Correction 225:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Match IE (per standards) w/ exist'g...IE 34.31.
[Plans; Sheet C4-103]
Correction 226:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Revise.
[Plans; Sheet C4-103]
Correction 227:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-In?
[Plans; Sheet C4-103]
Correction 228:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Match IE (per standards) w/ exist'g...IE 34.31.
[Plans; Sheet C4-103]
Correction 229:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-Type II called out on C4-101. If Type II, callout diameter and lid type on this plan also.
[Plans; Sheet C4-103]
Correction 230:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout solid lid.
[Plans; Sheet C4-103]
Correction 231:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout solid lid.
[Plans; Sheet C4-103]
Correction 232:
See Document Markup
Comments:
See comments on plan above.
[Plans; Sheet C4-103]
Correction 233:
See Document Markup
Comments:
See comments on plan above.
[Plans; Sheet C4-103]
Correction 234:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Revise per comments above.
[Plans; Sheet C4-103]
Correction 235:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Please callout a min. of 5in below the underdrain for clarity...(Ecology only recognizes the depth below the perforations of the underdrain for storage within the reservoir course.)
[Plans; Sheet C4-202]
Correction 236:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per conversation with Justin on 9/26, by the time the reservoir course is in overflow (El. 37.09 per detail), water is already spilling out at the SE corner of the project (El. 37.01). As an option, see example right and comments on Sht C4-101.
[Plans; Sheet C4-202]
Correction 237:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per conversation with Justin on 9/26, does this design allow the 6in overflow drain to keep up when the entire perm pavement area goes into overflow? See example right and comments on Sht C4-101.
[Plans; Sheet C4-202]
Correction 238:
See Document Markup
Comments:
FYI only...orifice located below top of outlet pipe.
[Plans; Sheet C4-202]
Correction 239:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Clarify?
[Plans; Sheet C5-102]
Correction 240:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Clarify?
[Plans; Sheet C5-103]
Correction 241:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per prior comment-Callout Sampling Connection per Std Detail 04.03.04.
[Plans; Sheet C5-104]
Correction 242:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Adjust slope to provide 0.1ft drop across structure per standards.
[Plans; Sheet C5-105]
Correction 243:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per prior comment-Ref Standard Detail 04.03.04 on Sheet C5-201.
[Plans; Sheet C5-105]
Correction 244:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Please add dimension btwn FDC and FH to read: "10ft (min) - 15ft (max)".
[Plans; Sheet C6-101]
Correction 245:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Please show GV symbols on plan.
[Plans; Sheet C6-102]
Correction 246:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per prior comment: Add-thrust block.
[Plans; Sheet C6-103]
Correction 247:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Please show GV symbols on plan.
[Plans; Sheet C6-103]
Correction 248:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per prior comment: Add-thrust block.
[Plans; Sheet C6-104]
Correction 249:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Please show GV symbols on plan.
[Plans; Sheet C6-105]
Correction 250:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per prior comment-Add reference to alignment on Sheet C6-104.
[Plans; Sheet C6-105]
Correction 251:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Please show GV symbols on plan.
[Plans; Sheet C6-106]
Correction 252:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout 10ft min to 15ft max distance btwn FDC and FH.
[Plans; Sheet C6-106]
Correction 253:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add City Standard Details:
03.02.01-2 // 03.02.01-3 // 03.10.03 // 03.11.01.
[Plans; Sheet C6-202]
Planning Review
Approved
10/22/2024
09/26/2024
Reviewer:
Corrections:
Correction 1:
Final Landscape Plan - Soil Req.
Comments:
Add the following note to the landscape plan, “A minimum of eight (8) inches of top soil, containing ten percent dry weight in planting beds, and 5% organic matter content in turf areas, and a pH from 6.0 to 8.0 or matching the pH of the original undisturbed soil. The topsoil layer shall have a minimum depth of eight inches (8”) except where tree roots limit the depth of incorporation of amendments needed to meet the criteria. Subsoils below the topsoil layer should be scarified at least 6 inches with some incorporation of the upper material to avoid stratified layers, where feasible. Installation of the eight inches (8”) of top soil, as described above, shall generally be achieved by placing five inches (5”) of imported sandy-loam top soil into planned landscape areas (sub-base scarified four inches (4”)) with a three-inch (3”) layer of compost tilled into the entire depth.”
Correction 2:
Final Landscape Plan - Soil Req. Cubic Yards
Comments:
Please estimate the total top soil required to meet the 8 inch minimum soil standard for all landscaped areas in cubic yards. The contractor will be required to submit delivery sheets and demonstrate compliance with top soil required and specified on plans at the time of final inspection.
Correction 3:
Final Landscape Plan - Mulch Req.
Comments:
Add the following note to the civil plans, "All planting areas shall be mulched with a uniform four (4”) inch layer of organic compost mulch material or wood chips over a properly cleaned, amended and graded subsurface."
Correction 4:
Miscellaneous Planning Correction
Comments:
Label all areas devoted to turf or lawn and indicate the method of establishment (seed, hydroseed or solid sod).
Correction 5:
Final Landscape Plan - Landscape Types
Comments:
The City's Vegetation Management Standards Manual (VMS) outlines specific treatment “types” that are required to be adhered to, dependent upon the yard area the landscaping is located within. See the VMS, sections 13 and 14 for full details. The VMS can be downloaded here: https://www.cityofpuyallup.org/puyallupvms
Correction 6:
Final Landscape Plan - Street Tree Site Prep
Comments:
Please be aware of the following standards in the VMS and Public Works Engineering and Construction Standards (found here: www.cityofpuyallup.org/1445/100---Roadway ) as they apply:
Section 8.3 of the VMS requires (4”) of organic compost mulch or wood chips.
Integrate city standard detail 01.02.08a – soil amendment and depth.
NOTE: Top soil placement/installation specs, depth and quality standards can be found in section 8.2 of the VMS. For new construction, cut and paste ALL of section 8.2(b) of the VMS into the planting notes/details of the final landscape plan sheets.
Correction 7:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
The site plan states that the EcoRain Detention Tank is proposed to manage runoff from the proposed roof. Please have the design engineer provide proof that the EcoRain Detention Tank system requires only turf grass as use of turf lawn is prohibited in storm water control facility areas, unless the water treatment structure is required by the project engineer for water quality treatment purposes per VMS Section 14.5 (included below).
VMS 14.5
SLD-02 – Landscaping in storm water control facilities (Implementing standards - PMC 20.58.005 (3) code requirement). Landscaping of storm water ponds and other storm water control or treatment facilities (e.g., rain gardens, bio-swales, bio-filtration cells, etc.) shall be designed to use native and/or climate adaptable plant materials to provide 100% ground coverage and 75% visual coverage within five (5) years of installation. In order to reduce maintenance requirements, the use of turf lawn is prohibited in these areas, unless part of a water treatment structure (e.g., bio-swale) where grass is required by the project engineer for water quality treatment purposes.
Ground covers shall be spaced at 18” intervals and shrubs at 3-5’ intervals, or as specified by the project landscape architect, to meet the 100% ground coverage and 75% visual coverage requirement within five (5) years. Groupings or clusters of native evergreen and native deciduous trees shall be integrated into the overall design. NW native shrubs and ground cover plant species that provide a native, wildflower-rich landscape area that utilizes native plant species that bloom in successive timeframes throughout the growing season shall be used in all storm pond areas.
This is intended to promote local biological diversity and provide pockets of landscape area to benefit pollinator species. Selections from the following shrub species, in addition to other acceptable native plants the meet the criteria of providing blooming plants throughout the growing season, may be utilized to meet the SLD-02 requirements and can be found in VMS 14.5.
Public Works Water Review
Approved
10/22/2024
09/26/2024
Reviewer:
Corrections:
Correction 1:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil C2-302: There is an existing domestic sample station that will be abandoned, and will need to be added to the new construction.
Correction 2:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil C6-101: For better control of the fire lines, consider adding one or two more gate valves to this proposed tee.
Correction 3:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil C6-101: For better domestic water quality, consider extending the proposed 4-inch domestic and tying into the existing 4-inch domestic to the south.
Correction 4:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil C6-101: The existing water service line to the old building was 1-inch in size. Consider adding a 2-inch gate valve at the 4-inch tee, and run 2-inch poly to the domestic service connection. The RPBA can then be 2-inch instead of 4-inch.
Correction 5:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil C6-101: Be aware that all proposed fire hydrants off dead-end 8-inch runs will have a maximum fire flow of 1,560 GPM due to the DOH and City requirement of 10-feet per second velocity limitation.
Correction 6:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil C6-101: Add a new domestic sample station somewhere on these proposed 4-inch domestic lines to replace the one that will be eliminated in the demolition phase of this project. Add City Standard detail 03.08.01 to this plan set.
Fire Review
Approved
10/22/2024
09/25/2024
Reviewer:
Engineering Traffic Review
VOID
10/22/2024
09/25/2024
Reviewer:
Public Works Streets Review
VOID
10/22/2024
09/25/2024
Reviewer:
Public Works Collection Review
VOID
10/22/2024
09/25/2024
Reviewer:
Engineering Storm Review
VOID
10/22/2024
09/25/2024
Reviewer:
Public Works Streets Review
Approved
10/01/2024
09/04/2024
Reviewer:
Public Works Collection Review
Approved
10/01/2024
09/03/2024
Reviewer:
Planning Review
Failed
10/01/2024
09/03/2024
Reviewer:
Corrections:
Correction 1:
Final Landscape Plan - Soil Req.
Comments:
Add the following note to the landscape plan, “A minimum of eight (8) inches of top soil, containing ten percent dry weight in planting beds, and 5% organic matter content in turf areas, and a pH from 6.0 to 8.0 or matching the pH of the original undisturbed soil. The topsoil layer shall have a minimum depth of eight inches (8”) except where tree roots limit the depth of incorporation of amendments needed to meet the criteria. Subsoils below the topsoil layer should be scarified at least 6 inches with some incorporation of the upper material to avoid stratified layers, where feasible. Installation of the eight inches (8”) of top soil, as described above, shall generally be achieved by placing five inches (5”) of imported sandy-loam top soil into planned landscape areas (sub-base scarified four inches (4”)) with a three-inch (3”) layer of compost tilled into the entire depth.”
Correction 2:
Final Landscape Plan - Soil Req. Cubic Yards
Comments:
Please estimate the total top soil required to meet the 8 inch minimum soil standard for all landscaped areas in cubic yards. The contractor will be required to submit delivery sheets and demonstrate compliance with top soil required and specified on plans at the time of final inspection.
Correction 3:
Final Landscape Plan - Mulch Req.
Comments:
Add the following note to the civil plans, "All planting areas shall be mulched with a uniform four (4”) inch layer of organic compost mulch material or wood chips over a properly cleaned, amended and graded subsurface."
Correction 4:
Miscellaneous Planning Correction
Comments:
Label all areas devoted to turf or lawn and indicate the method of establishment (seed, hydroseed or solid sod).
Correction 5:
Final Landscape Plan - Landscape Types
Comments:
The City's Vegetation Management Standards Manual (VMS) outlines specific treatment “types” that are required to be adhered to, dependent upon the yard area the landscaping is located within. See the VMS, sections 13 and 14 for full details. The VMS can be downloaded here: https://www.cityofpuyallup.org/puyallupvms
Correction 6:
Final Landscape Plan - Street Tree Site Prep
Comments:
Please be aware of the following standards in the VMS and Public Works Engineering and Construction Standards (found here: www.cityofpuyallup.org/1445/100---Roadway ) as they apply:
Section 8.3 of the VMS requires (4”) of organic compost mulch or wood chips.
Integrate city standard detail 01.02.08a – soil amendment and depth.
NOTE: Top soil placement/installation specs, depth and quality standards can be found in section 8.2 of the VMS. For new construction, cut and paste ALL of section 8.2(b) of the VMS into the planting notes/details of the final landscape plan sheets.
Correction 7:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
The site plan states that the EcoRain Detention Tank is proposed to manage runoff from the proposed roof. Please have the design engineer provide proof that the EcoRain Detention Tank system requires only turf grass as use of turf lawn is prohibited in storm water control facility areas, unless the water treatment structure is required by the project engineer for water quality treatment purposes per VMS Section 14.5 (included below).
VMS 14.5
SLD-02 – Landscaping in storm water control facilities (Implementing standards - PMC 20.58.005 (3) code requirement). Landscaping of storm water ponds and other storm water control or treatment facilities (e.g., rain gardens, bio-swales, bio-filtration cells, etc.) shall be designed to use native and/or climate adaptable plant materials to provide 100% ground coverage and 75% visual coverage within five (5) years of installation. In order to reduce maintenance requirements, the use of turf lawn is prohibited in these areas, unless part of a water treatment structure (e.g., bio-swale) where grass is required by the project engineer for water quality treatment purposes.
Ground covers shall be spaced at 18” intervals and shrubs at 3-5’ intervals, or as specified by the project landscape architect, to meet the 100% ground coverage and 75% visual coverage requirement within five (5) years. Groupings or clusters of native evergreen and native deciduous trees shall be integrated into the overall design. NW native shrubs and ground cover plant species that provide a native, wildflower-rich landscape area that utilizes native plant species that bloom in successive timeframes throughout the growing season shall be used in all storm pond areas.
This is intended to promote local biological diversity and provide pockets of landscape area to benefit pollinator species. Selections from the following shrub species, in addition to other acceptable native plants the meet the criteria of providing blooming plants throughout the growing season, may be utilized to meet the SLD-02 requirements and can be found in VMS 14.5.
Engineering Civil Review
Failed
10/01/2024
08/29/2024
Reviewer:
Corrections:
Correction 1:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide a small-scale PIT test to determine infiltration feasibility. [geotech, pg 17]
Correction 2:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide continuous groundwater monitoring data during the wet season (December 21st- April 1st) [geotech, pg 27]
Correction 3:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide conversion to NAVD 88 Datum. [civils, pg 1]
Correction 4:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add the infiltration testing report to the geotech report document. It's not intuitive to look in the drainage report for geotechnical testing. [drainage report, pg 17]
Correction 5:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add that this is sheet C1-201. [civils, pg 6]
Correction 6:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide a detail for the proposed swale. [civils, pg 9]
Correction 7:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide a detail for the proposed baffle tank. [civils, pg 10]
Correction 8:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show utility hatch that this line is to be removed. [civils, pg 12]
Correction 9:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show proposed concrete in darker hatch. [civils, pg 15]
Correction 10:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide invert elevation at the building connection point. [civils, pg 19]
Correction 11:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Replace with city standard flow control manhole 02.01.06 or 02.01.07 and provide orifices and elevations. [civils, pg 19]
Correction 12:
See Document Markup
Comments:
-Provide EcoRain manufacturer's literature and include in the storm report. Information should include at a minimum:
1) storage volume per unit;
2) cleanout/maintenance and inspection port req'ts;
3) O&M req'ts
4) geotextile req'ts;
5) construction req'ts (excavation, backfill, cover, ventilation, etc.)
[Storm Report; Pg 1 of 62]
Correction 13:
See Document Markup
Comments:
-Provide grease interceptor calculations and include in the storm report as an appendix.
[Storm Report; Pg 1 of 62]
Correction 14:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify- TPN 0420331121.
[Storm Report; Pg 8 of 62]
Correction 15:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Please revise to "vacated 5th Street SE".
[Storm Report; Pg 8 of 62]
Correction 16:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide basin exhibits indicating the Existing Conditions and Proposed Conditions outlined in the table.
[Storm Report; Pg 8 of 62]
Correction 17:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Clarify-Sheet C2-301 indicates approximately 63,965sf of disturbed area.
[Storm Report; Pg 8 of 62]
Correction 18:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Clarify-Sheet C2-301 indicates approximately 54,100sf of hard surface area.
[Storm Report; Pg 8 of 62]
Correction 19:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Clarify-per the List Approach, Footnote 2, pavement (when proposed) must be permeable to the extent feasible. Why is the replaced concrete pavement not permeable?
[Storm Report; Pg 8 of 62]
Correction 20:
See Document Markup
Comments:
See comment(s) on the Area Coverage Table below.
[Storm Report; Pg 8 of 62]
Correction 21:
See Document Markup
Comments:
See comment(s) on the Area Coverage Table on Page 8 of 62.
[Storm Report; Pg 9 of 62]
Correction 22:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Please revise to "vacated 5th Street SE".
[Storm Report; Pg 10 of 62]
Correction 23:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide evidence of wet-season (Dec 1 thru Apr 1) high groundwater elevation as required by the Ecology Manual. If project timelines do not allow wet-season monitoring prior to anticipated start of construction, provide a financial security (Assignment-of-funds or Bond) in the amount of $7,500.00 that guarantees monitoring during the upcoming wet-season.
[Storm Report; Pg 10 of 62]
Correction 24:
See Document Markup
Comments:
FYI Only-permeable pavement could be found to be infeasible (if desired) since the proposed project will be replacing existing impervious surfaces. Per Ecology infeasibility criteria: "Where replacing existing impervious surfaces, unless the existing surface is a non-pollution generating surface over outwash soil with a measured initial saturated infiltration rate of 4 inches per hour or greater."
[Storm Report; Pg 11 of 62]
Correction 25:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Clarify-cannot find this in the WWHM calculations. In addition, Ecology does not recommend run-on from up-gradient PGIS without conditions.
[Storm Report; Pg 12 of 62]
Correction 26:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Clarify-per the List Approach, Footnote 2, pavement (when proposed) must be permeable to the extent feasible. Why is the replaced concrete pavement not permeable?
[Storm Report; Pg 13 of 62]
Correction 27:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Clarify-how does the Fair prevent the NPGHS area from being accessed by motor vehicles and creating a pollution generating surface?
[Storm Report; Pg 13 of 62]
Correction 28:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Is there a reason the sand layer does not extend to the perimeter of the permeable pavement section...particularly due to the run-on from the upgradient PGHS area.
[Storm Report; Pg 13 of 62]
Correction 29:
See Document Markup
Comments:
"Vault" or "facility"?
[Storm Report; Pg 15 of 62]
Correction 30:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-acre feet?
[Storm Report; Pg 15 of 62]
Correction 31:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Clarify-what was the date of the PIT testing? City Standards require wet season testing.
[Storm Report; Pg 20 of 62]
Correction 32:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Clarify:
Total Disturbed Area = 60,635sf = 1.39ac
Less Building Roof = 14,460sf = <0.332ac>
Less Permeable AC Pvmt = 29,359sf = <.674ac>
Less Vegetation Area = 9,770sf = <0.22ac>
Remaining Balance Not Accounted for = 0.164ac (7,144sf)...
...which appears to be the replaced impervious concrete pavement (Detail C/C3-301), is pollution generating, and must comply with MR5, MR6, and MR7.
[Storm Report; Pg 39 of 62]
Correction 33:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-Section B/C3-301 indicates 3 inch wearing course.
[Storm Report; Pg 43 of 62]
Correction 34:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide supporting structural calculations confirming the proposed permeable pavement cross-section will support HS-20 loading (min).
[Storm Report; Pg 43 of 62]
Correction 35:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-Per Ecology BMP T5.15, typical void space for the wearing course is 16%-25%.
[Storm Report; Pg 43 of 62]
Correction 36:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-Section MR5, Permeable Pavement states there is a 1-acre lateral flow basin tributary to the permeable pavement.
[Storm Report; Pg 57 of 62]
Correction 37:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Include geotechnical study in the Storm Report.
[Geotechnical Study; Pg 1 of 37]
Correction 38:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide wet-season (Dec 1 thru Apr 1) high groundwater elevation as required by the Ecology Manual. If project timelines do not allow wet-season monitoring prior to anticipated start of construction, provide a financial security (Assignment-of-funds or Bond) in the amount of $7,500.00 that guarantees monitoring during the upcoming wet-season.
[Geotechnical Study; Pg 1 of 37]
Correction 39:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per City Standards, Section 1.8(4), plans shall be based on the NAVD88 datum. Per conversation with JMJ (Justin), elevations will be corrected on the Record Drawings.
[Plans; Sheet C1-001]
Correction 40:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use current City Standard Stormwater Notes. See City Standardss, Section 207.
[Plans; Sheet C1-002]
Correction 41:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Also include City Standard Section 406 Testing Requirements.
[Plans; Sheet C1-002]
Correction 42:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Also include City Standard Section 209 Testing and Inspection.
[Plans; Sheet C1-002]
Correction 43:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Reorient sheet to read correctly.
[Plans; Sheet C1-201]
Correction 44:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per City Standards, Section 1.8(4), plans shall be based on the NAVD88 datum. Per conversation with JMJ (Justin), elevations will be corrected on the Record Drawings.
[Plans; Sheet C1-202]
Correction 45:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-CN 1.
[Plans; Sheet C2-101
Correction 46:
See Document Markup
Comments:
See comment in Storm Report, Page 8 of 62.
[Plans; Sheet C2-301]
Correction 47:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Clarify-what is happening with the existing storm line here.
[Plans; Sheet C2-302]
Correction 48:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Clarify this shaded area.
[Plans; Sheet C2-304]
Correction 49:
See Document Markup
Comments:
DDCVA.
[Plans; Sheet C3-101]
Correction 50:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout 10ft (min) - 15ft (max) separation btwn FH and FDC.
[Plans; Sheet C3-101]
Correction 51:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Hilite the location of the geotextile (sim to Details D and E below. Also, on the sand layer side.
[Plans; Sheet C3-301]
Correction 52:
See Document Markup
Comments:
POROUS PAVEMENT SUBGRADE PREPARATION NOTES
1.Remove existing organic or paving materials from the surface to be prepared.
2.Prepare the subgrade in accordance with the geotechnical engineer’s requirements and the following:
3.Excavation to final subgrade shall occur immediately prior to placing permeable materials. If necessary, the contractor may excavate to an intermediate subgrade elevation established at 12-inches above the final subgrade to assist with field operations.
4.Grading to final subgrade elevation shall be completed by machinery operation on the intermediate subgrade level or outside of the porous fill/pavement prism.
5.The contractor shall phase the work so as not to compromise or overly compact the subgrade. Should it be necessary for machinery or trucks to access the final subgrade in a certain area, the contractor shall protect the subgrade from over-compaction by placing steel sheets, or using another methodology approved by the geotechnical engineer and City.
6.Areas determined to be overly compacted in the opinion of the Engineer, Geotechnical Engineer, or City, shall be scarified by the contractor to a depth agreed upon by the Engineer, Geotechnical Engineer, and City.
7.Loose or disturbed areas identified during excavation to grade shall be over-excavated to firm bearing and replaced with APWA/WSDOT GSP permeable ballast.
8.Approved porous fill materials shall be back-dumped onto the subgrade from the edge of the installation and pushed out onto the subgrade.
9.Trucks shall then back-dump subsequent loads on top of the previously dumped/pushed material as the installation progresses.
10.Final compaction shall be verified by the Geotechnical Engineer.
[Plans; Sheet C3-301]
Correction 53:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Please add the following notes:
Correction 54:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Clarify-per the List Approach, Footnote 2, pavement (when proposed) must be permeable to the extent feasible. Why is the replaced concrete pavement not permeable?
[Plans; Sheet C4-101]
Correction 55:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Is there a reason the sand layer does not extend to the perimeter of the permeable pavement section...particularly due to the run-on from the upgradient PGHS area.
[Plans; Sheet C4-101]
Correction 56:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Clarify-how does the Fair prevent the NPGHS area from being accessed by motor vehicles and creating a pollution generating surface?
[Plans; Sheet C4-101]
Correction 57:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Please add-"See Porous Pavement Subgrade Preparation Notes on Sheet C3-301."
[Plans; Sheet C4-101]
Correction 58:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout pipe info (mat'l, slope, length).
[Plans; Sheet C4-101]
Correction 59:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide cleanout and callout Rim and IE.
[Plans; Sheet C4-101]
Correction 60:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Clarify-what is happening with the existing storm line here.
[Plans; Sheet C4-101]
Correction 61:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide inspection ports in accordance with City Standards 202.2(3)c.
[Plans; Sheet C4-101]
Correction 62:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide cross-section through this area; provide check dam detail; provide overflow detail and identify location in the section.
[Plans; Sheet C4-101]
Correction 63:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide cleanout at tee.
[Plans; Sheet C4-101]
Correction 64:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-IE places the top of pipe into the wearing course.
[Plans; Sheet C4-101]
Correction 65:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Is an overflow (low points) warranted along these perimeters?
[Plans; Sheet C4-101]
Correction 66:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Ductile Iron due to shallow bury.
[Plans; Sheet C4-101]
Correction 67:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout Rim and IE.
[Plans; Sheet C4-101]
Correction 68:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide pipe info.
[Plans; Sheet C4-101]
Correction 69:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide EcoRain manufacturer's literature and include in the storm report. See comments in the storm report.
[Plans; Sheet C4-101]
Correction 70:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide cross-section thru the facility and include the following info:
-Surface elevation
-Top of tank elevation
-Bottom of tank elevation
-Subgrade elevation
-Sediment storage
-2yr water elevation
-10yr water elevation
-excavation wrap (if required)
-Synthetic impermeable liner 30mil UV resistant (due to groundwater elevation)
-backfill dimensions all around
[Plans; Sheet C4-101]
Correction 71:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-are vents required for this system?
[Plans; Sheet C4-101]
Correction 72:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Identify control structure. Min. control structure per Standards is 54-inch. Revise accordingly.
[Plans; Sheet C4-101]
Correction 73:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use either Standard Detail 02.01.06 or 02.01.07. Callout riser elevations on chosen detail.
[Plans; Sheet C4-101]
Correction 74:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide pipe info.
[Plans; Sheet C4-101]
Correction 75:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout pipe IE at tank.
[Plans; Sheet C4-101]
Correction 76:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout pipe IE at tank.
[Plans; Sheet C4-101]
Correction 77:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout Rim and IE info.
[Plans; Sheet C4-101]
Correction 78:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout Rim and IE info.
[Plans; Sheet C4-101]
Correction 79:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Please add-"See Storm Alignment A on Sheet C4-102."
[Plans; Sheet C4-101]
Correction 80:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout pipe mat'l, length and slope.
[Plans; Sheet C4-101]
Correction 81:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per the Storm Report, Page 10 of 62, the elevation of the groundwater at time of testing (not wet-season high) was El. 33.9 which places the Ecorain units in the groundwater. Provide a manufactured impermeable synthetic liner to prevent groundwater intrusion into the detention facility. Callout the synthetic liner requirements (min. 30mil ultraviolet (UV) light resistant) and show on the Ecorain details. In addition, provide buoyancy verification (calculations and/or certification letter).
[Plans; Sheet C4-102]
Correction 82:
See Document Markup
Comments:
North Arrow is aligned incorrectly.
[Plans; Sheet C4-102]
Correction 83:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide cleanout and callout Rim and IE.
[Plans; Sheet C4-102]
Correction 84:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide cleanout at tee.
[Plans; Sheet C4-102]
Correction 85:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout pipe length, mat'l, and slope.
[Plans; Sheet C4-102]
Correction 86:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout CB info (type, rim and IE).
[Plans; Sheet C4-102]
Correction 87:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide pipe info.
[Plans; Sheet C4-102]
Correction 88:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout to provide 1ft min depth of cover at edge of pavement.
[Plans; Sheet C4-102]
Correction 89:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Identify control structure. Min. control structure per Standards is 54-inch. Revise accordingly.
[Plans; Sheet C4-102]
Correction 90:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use either Standard Detail 02.01.06 or 02.01.07. Callout riser elevations on chosen detail.
[Plans; Sheet C4-102]
Correction 91:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify callout (existing CB).
[Plans; Sheet C4-102]
Correction 92:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Identify control structure. Min. control structure per Standards is 54-inch. Revise accordingly.
[Plans; Sheet C4-102]
Correction 93:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add City Standard Details:
02.01.05 // 02.01.06 or 02.01.07 // 02.01.08 // 02.01.10
[Plans; Sheet C4-201]
Correction 94:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout control riser information (orifice size, elevations, diameter) on Detail 02.01.06 or 02.01.07, or in a separate table.
[Plans; Sheet C4-201]
Correction 95:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use Standard Detail 04.03.04 on Sheet C5-201.
[Plans; Sheet C5-101]
Correction 96:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per City Standards, provide pipe info (mat'l, slope, length) on this plan sheet also.
[Plans; Sheet C5-101]
Correction 97:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per City Standards, callout structure and cleanout info (rim, IEs, size) on this plan sheet also.
[Plans; Sheet C5-101]
Correction 98:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-this is the only run of PVC between SSMH1 and SSMH6. Is there a reason that all of the other runs are DI? It appears there is adequate cover.
[Plans; Sheet C5-101]
Correction 99:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use Standard Detail 04.03.04 on Sheet C5-201.
[Plans; Sheet C5-102]
Correction 100:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify callout (2?).
[Plans; Sheet C5-102]
Correction 101:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify callout (2?).
[Plans; Sheet C5-102]
Correction 102:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use Standard Detail 04.03.04 on Sheet C5-201.
[Plans; Sheet C5-103]
Correction 103:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify callout (2?).
[Plans; Sheet C5-103]
Correction 104:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify callout (2?).
[Plans; Sheet C5-103]
Correction 105:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify callout (2?).
[Plans; Sheet C5-103]
Correction 106:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-"In"?
[Plans; Sheet C5-103]
Correction 107:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use Standard Detail 04.03.04 on Sheet C5-201.
[Plans; Sheet C5-104]
Correction 108:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout the 10ft min separation on this sheet too.
[Plans; Sheet C5-104]
Correction 109:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout GI Rim elev.
[Plans; Sheet C5-104]
Correction 110:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show alignment and outlet location of the GI vent. Callout the elevation of the vent outlet.
[Plans; Sheet C5-104]
Correction 111:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout Sampling Connection per Std Detail 04.03.04.
[Plans; Sheet C5-104]
Correction 112:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use Standard Detail 04.03.04 on Sheet C5-201.
[Plans; Sheet C5-105]
Correction 113:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-Sheet C5-102?
[Plans; Sheet C5-105]
Correction 114:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use 6in side sewer per standards.
[Plans; Sheet C5-105]
Correction 115:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout SE IE.
[Plans; Sheet C5-105]
Correction 116:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout Exist'g pipe info.
[Plans; Sheet C5-105]
Correction 117:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout SE IE.
[Plans; Sheet C5-105]
Correction 118:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use 6in side sewer per standards.
[Plans; Sheet C5-105]
Correction 119:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Clarify-is there a reason to use min. slope at this pipe run?
[Plans; Sheet C5-105]
Correction 120:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show alignment and outlet location of the GI vent. Callout the elevation of the vent outlet.
[Plans; Sheet C5-105]
Correction 121:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout GI Rim elev.
[Plans; Sheet C5-105]
Correction 122:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add City Standard Details:
04.03.04 // 04.03.05
[Plans; Sheet C5-201]
Correction 123:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add Fire Code approval block per City Standards, Section 1.4.
[Plans; Sheet C6-101]
Correction 124:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Revise to DDCVA.
[Plans; Sheet C6-101]
Correction 125:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout connection details (valve, fitting,thrust block, etc).
[Plans; Sheet C6-101]
Correction 126:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout connection details (valve, fitting,thrust block, etc).
[Plans; Sheet C6-101]
Correction 127:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per City Standards, provide pipe info (size, mat'l, fittings, valves, thrust blocks, etc.) on this plan sheet also.
[Plans; Sheet C6-101]
Correction 128:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout fitting info (type, fitting, thrust block, etc).
[Plans; Sheet C6-101]
Correction 129:
See Document Markup
Comments:
FYI-Pipe info does not agree w Sht C6-103.
[Plans; Sheet C6-101]
Correction 130:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout 3ft min. clear zone.
[Plans; Sheet C6-101]
Correction 131:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-pipe size (6in?).
[Plans; Sheet C6-101]
Correction 132:
See Document Markup
Comments:
FYI-Pipe info does not agree w Sht C6-103.
[Plans; Sheet C6-101]
Correction 133:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout connection details (valve, fitting, thrust block, etc).
[Plans; Sheet C6-101]
Correction 134:
See Document Markup
Comments:
FYI-Pipe slope does not agree w Sht C6-103.
[Plans; Sheet C6-101]
Correction 135:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout fitting info (type, fitting, valve, thrust block, etc).
[Plans; Sheet C6-101]
Correction 136:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout fitting info (type, fitting, thrust block, etc).
[Plans; Sheet C6-101]
Correction 137:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add reference to alignment on Sheet C6-103.
[Plans; Sheet C6-101]
Correction 138:
See Document Markup
Comments:
FYI-Pipe slope does not agree w Sht C6-102.
[Plans; Sheet C6-101]
Correction 139:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-pipe size (6in?).
[Plans; Sheet C6-101]
Correction 140:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add reference to alignment on Sheet C6-102.
[Plans; Sheet C6-101]
Correction 141:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add reference to alignment on Sheet C6-105.
[Plans; Sheet C6-101]
Correction 142:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout fitting info (type, fitting, valve, thrust block, etc).
[Plans; Sheet C6-101]
Correction 143:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout fitting info (type, fitting, valve, thrust block, etc).
[Plans; Sheet C6-101]
Correction 144:
See Document Markup
Comments:
FYI-Pipe slope does not agree w Sht C6-102.
[Plans; Sheet C6-101]
Correction 145:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout fitting info (type, fitting, valves, thrust block, etc).
[Plans; Sheet C6-101]
Correction 146:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add reference to alignment on Sheet C6-106.
[Plans; Sheet C6-101]
Correction 147:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout fitting info (type, fitting, thrust block, etc).
[Plans; Sheet C6-101]
Correction 148:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout fitting info (type, fitting, thrust block, etc).
[Plans; Sheet C6-101]
Correction 149:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout fitting info (type, fitting, thrust block, etc).
[Plans; Sheet C6-101]
Correction 150:
See Document Markup
Comments:
FYI-Pipe slope does not agree w Sht C6-102.
[Plans; Sheet C6-101]
Correction 151:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add reference to alignment on Sheet C6-104.
[Plans; Sheet C6-101]
Correction 152:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add reference to alignment on Sheet C6-102.
[Plans; Sheet C6-101]
Correction 153:
See Document Markup
Comments:
FYI-Pipe info does not agree w Sht C6-105.
[Plans; Sheet C6-101]
Correction 154:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-pipe size (6in?).
[Plans; Sheet C6-101]
Correction 155:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout fitting info (type, fitting, valve, thrust block, etc).
[Plans; Sheet C6-101]
Correction 156:
See Document Markup
Comments:
FYI-Pipe info does not agree w Sht C6-106.
[Plans; Sheet C6-101]
Correction 157:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout fitting info (type, fitting, thrust block, etc).
[Plans; Sheet C6-101]
Correction 158:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout fitting info (type, fitting, thrust block, etc).
[Plans; Sheet C6-101]
Correction 159:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add Fire Code approval block per City Standards, Section 1.4.
[Plans; Sheet C6-201]
Correction 160:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-sheets out of sequence with the planset.
[Plans; Sheet C6-201]
Correction 161:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add Fire Code approval block per City Standards, Section 1.4.
[Plans; Sheet C6-202]
Correction 162:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-sheets out of sequence with the planset.
[Plans; Sheet C6-202]
Correction 163:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add City Standard Details:
03.01.01 // 03.02.01-1 // 03.02.01-2 // 03.02.01-3 // 03.03.03 // 03.04.03 (if applicable) // 03.08.01 // 03.10.03 // 03.11.01.
[Plans; Sheet C6-202]
Correction 164:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-sheets out of sequence with the planset.
[Plans; Sheet C7-101]
Correction 165:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add Fire Code approval block per City Standards, Section 1.4.
[Plans; Sheet C6-102]
Correction 166:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add reference to alignment on Sheet C6-103.
[Plans; Sheet C6-102]
Correction 167:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout hydrant run info and show GV on this sheet too.
[Plans; Sheet C6-102]
Correction 168:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout pipe mat'l.
[Plans; Sheet C6-102]
Correction 169:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add reference to alignment on Sheet C6-105.
[Plans; Sheet C6-102]
Correction 170:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add reference to alignment on Sheet C6-106.
[Plans; Sheet C6-102]
Correction 171:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout 4in alignment info (pipe mat'l, length, fittings, valves, thrust blocks, etc.).
[Plans; Sheet C6-102]
Correction 172:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout RPBA.
[Plans; Sheet C6-102]
Correction 173:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add reference to alignment on Sheet C6-104.
[Plans; Sheet C6-102]
Correction 174:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add Fire Code approval block per City Standards, Section 1.4.
[Plans; Sheet C6-103]
Correction 175:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add-thrust block.
[Plans; Sheet C6-103]
Correction 176:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout hydrant run info and show GV on this sheet too.
[Plans; Sheet C6-103]
Correction 177:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show GV.
[Plans; Sheet C6-103]
Correction 178:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add reference to alignment on Sheet C6-102.
[Plans; Sheet C6-103]
Correction 179:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add Fire Code approval block per City Standards, Section 1.4.
[Plans; Sheet C6-104]
Correction 180:
See Document Markup
Comments:
City Standards require ductile iron. Revise accordingly.
[Plans; Sheet C6-104]
Correction 181:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add reference to alignment on Sheet C6-102.
[Plans; Sheet C6-104]
Correction 182:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add-thrust block.
[Plans; Sheet C6-104]
Correction 183:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add reference to alignment on Sheet C6-105.
[Plans; Sheet C6-104]
Correction 184:
See Document Markup
Comments:
City Standards require ductile iron. Revise accordingly.
[Plans; Sheet C6-104]
Correction 185:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add Fire Code approval block per City Standards, Section 1.4.
[Plans; Sheet C6-105]
Correction 186:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add reference to alignment on Sheet C6-104.
[Plans; Sheet C6-105]
Correction 187:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add reference to alignment on Sheet C6-102.
[Plans; Sheet C6-105]
Correction 188:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout hydrant run info and show GV on this sheet too.
[Plans; Sheet C6-105]
Correction 189:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add Fire Code approval block per City Standards, Section 1.4.
[Plans; Sheet C6-106]
Correction 190:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add reference to alignment on Sheet C6-102.
[Plans; Sheet C6-106]
Correction 191:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout hydrant run info and show GV on this sheet too.
[Plans; Sheet C6-106]
Correction 192:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout 10ft min to 15ft max distance btwn FDC and FH.
[Plans; Sheet C6-106]
Correction 193:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout fitting info (type, fitting, thrust block, etc).
[Plans; Sheet C6-106]
Correction 194:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout thrust block.
[Plans; Sheet C6-106]
Correction 195:
See Document Markup
Comments:
TMDL for Fecal on Clarks Creek.
[CSWPPP; Pg 4 of 94]
Correction 196:
See Document Markup
Comments:
TMDL for Fecal on Clarks Creek.
[CSWPPP; Pg 25 of 94]
Correction 197:
See Document Markup
Comments:
TMDL for Fecal on Clarks Creek.
[CSWPPP; Pg 28 of 94]
Correction 198:
See Document Markup
Comments:
TMDL for Fecal on Clarks Creek.
[CSWPPP; Pg 92 of 94]
Public Works Water Review
Failed
10/01/2024
08/16/2024
Reviewer:
Corrections:
Correction 1:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil C2-302: There is an existing domestic sample station that will be abandoned, and will need to be added to the new construction.
Correction 2:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil C6-101: For better control of the fire lines, consider adding one or two more gate valves to this proposed tee.
Correction 3:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil C6-101: For better domestic water quality, consider extending the proposed 4-inch domestic and tying into the existing 4-inch domestic to the south.
Correction 4:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil C6-101: The existing water service line to the old building was 1-inch in size. Consider adding a 2-inch gate valve at the 4-inch tee, and run 2-inch poly to the domestic service connection. The RPBA can then be 2-inch instead of 4-inch.
Correction 5:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil C6-101: Be aware that all proposed fire hydrants off dead-end 8-inch runs will have a maximum fire flow of 1,560 GPM due to the DOH and City requirement of 10-feet per second velocity limitation.
Correction 6:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil C6-101: Add a new domestic sample station somewhere on these proposed 4-inch domestic lines to replace the one that will be eliminated in the demolition phase of this project. Add City Standard detail 03.08.01 to this plan set.
Fire Review
Approved
10/01/2024
08/09/2024
Reviewer:
Engineering Traffic Review
Approved
10/01/2024
08/02/2024
Reviewer:
Engineering Storm Review
VOID
10/01/2024
08/02/2024
Reviewer: