Review Type
Outcome
Est. Completion Date
Completed
External Agency Review
Comments
07/14/2023
08/25/2023
Reviewer:
Corrections:
Correction 1:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
Exemption from Construction Prohibition Request: The subject property is located within a volcanic hazard area. Per Puyallup Municipal Code 21.06.1260 hazardous facilities such as bulk propane plants are not allowed in these areas without an exemption from the Development & Permitting Services Director. Submitted exemption request letter requires additional changes and supporting information to be processed.
Correction 2:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
Exemption request letter: provide calculations for how you determined that the propane tanks will not move during a lahar event. Please provide evidence that an acceptable engineering method was used for these calculations. Provide sources for physics forces used.
Correction 3:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
Exemption request letter: Provide clarification as to how the propane tanks will be 'surrounded by water' during a lahar event.
Correction 4:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
Exemption Request Letter: The project appears to propose storage area for smaller propane tanks. Will these tanks be stored while full or empty? These smaller tanks will need to be anchored or stored in such a way as to prevent them from floating away during a lahar event.
Correction 5:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
Exemption Request Letter: Provide FEMA, USGS, or other regulatory guidance on Lahar or other equivalent natural disaster physics forces used in calculations.
Correction 6:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
Exemption Request Letter: Per PMC 21.06.1260 (a) one of the findings for approval of a hazardous facility construction exemption is "That the critical facility has a satisfactory critical alert notification system in place which coordinates with local and regional emergency monitoring systems". Please provide Letters of acknowledgement from the Pierce County Department of Emergency Management and/or Washington State Emergency Management Division regarding coordination of the on-site emergency notification system with one or both of these agencies.
Correction 7:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
Exemption Request Letter: Provide a written evacuation plan which is coordinated with the City of Puyallup adopted emergency evacuation plan to provide a route from the site to the City’s adopted evacuation routes. The City Emergency Manager will review this plan to ensure conformance with City standards.
Correction 8:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
Exemption Request Letter: Provide all manuals and plans referenced in the exemption request letter for City Review. Provide details of how evacuation drills will be conducted.
Correction 9:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Revise buoyancy check to correspond with revised buoyancy calculations provided by the City. Required re-calculations for tank buoyancy have been uploaded to the documents and images section for your reference.
Correction 10:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Lahar events are not made of water, they are made of mud flow. Revise all references to a lahar event as consisting of water.
Correction 11:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide manufacturer's specification sheets and construction details for relief valve system
Correction 12:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Clarify which emergency alert system that this facility will be connected to? There are several.
Correction 13:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Clarify step 4 of emergency evacuation plan. Which valves and switches have to be turned off to ensures safety? Could these valves and switched be automatically shut off via a signal from the emergency warning system?
Correction 14:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
Please direct any questions regarding External Agency Review Comments and the lahar exemption to the City's Emergency Management Manger, Kirstin Hofmann, khofmann@puyallupwa.gov, 253-244-8110.
Reviewer Comments:
Planning Review
Comments
07/14/2023
07/14/2023
Reviewer:
Corrections:
Correction 1:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Irrigation not allowed in ROW Planter Strips [Irrigation Plan, Sheet I1]
Correction 2:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Label North, South, and East perimeter landscaping areas at "Type III Landscaping" [Landscape Plan, Sheet L1}
Correction 3:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Label planter strips in ROW as "Planter Strip" [Landscape Plan, Sheet L1]
Correction 4:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Label west perimeter landscape area directly abutting building as "Type SLD-01 Landscaping" [Landscape Plan, Sheet L1]
Correction 5:
See Document Markup
Comments:
What will the area around the tank be used for? Please identify on the site plan [Landscape Plan, Sheet L1]
Correction 6:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Label and show all existing and proposed utilities on the preliminary landscape plan. No utility lines shall pass under required landscape planters unless justification is provided demonstrating that no feasible alternative exists [Landscape Plan, Sheet L1]
Correction 7:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Irrigation missing from east perimeter landscaping area [Irrigation Plan, Sheet I1]
Correction 8:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Sidewalk must be shifted to abut property line. Landscape planter shall be widened where necessary to fill in the roadway section [Site plan, Sheet 1.1p]
Correction 9:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Perimeter parking lot landscape islands must be 12ft in width and the depth of the abutting parking stall [Landscape Plan, Sheet L1]
Correction 10:
See Document Markup
Comments:
The max building height shall be equal to the proposed building setback within the first 35 ft of setback from the adjoining public street. The max building height may be increased by 1.5 ft for each additional foot of setback in excess of 35 ft up to the max. Building heights withing required setbacks shall be measured from the grade of the public sidewalk or centerline of the public street adjoining the site. [Elevations, Sheet 2.1P]
Correction 11:
See Document Markup
Comments:
What is the area to the north of the building to be used for? [Site Plan, Sheet 1.1P]
Correction 12:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
6 ft tall wood or opaque fence shall be added 20ft from the front property line extending across the entire frontage (except where driveways conflict), to obscure the view from the ROW of the tank storage areas. The fence shall further extend around the rest of the perimeter of the site to further obscure the tanks from adjacent properties.
Correction 13:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
All portions of a lot not devoted to building, future building, parking, access drives, walks, storage or accessory uses shall be landscaped in a manner consistent with the VMS and PMC 20.58.
Correction 14:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
Contact at Pierce County Department of Emergency Management is Joshua Atkins, his email is Joshua.atkins@piercecountywa.gov. Puyallup lahar evacuation routes are available at https://www.epiceoc.com/pages/lahar.
Correction 15:
See Document Markup
Comments:
paving is required in all areas, remove reference to gravel, [Site and Utility Plan, Pg 1]
Correction 16:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add silva cells around required landscape island, See vegetation managment standards manual for information on required sivla cells [Site and Utility Plan, Pg 1]
Correction 17:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Storm line must be moved out of planting bed to prevent conflict with future trees [Site and Utility Plan Pg. 2]
Reviewer Comments:
Fire Review
No Comments
07/14/2023
07/12/2023
Reviewer:
Corrections:
Correction 1:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
As per the pre-application requirements, please show new fire hydrant on site plans. Permit # PLPRE20220046 item number one and four.
1. A fire hydrant will be required on 23rd street SE.
2. Propane tanks will need to comply with NFPA, IBC, and IFC.
3. Comply with all State codes.
4. A fire sprinkler system will be determined by water availability at the new fire hydrant.
5. Electronic gates will require battery backup and KNOX override for fire department access.
6. Propane tank will be required to be anchored to a footing or slab.
7. If the Propane tank is underground an engineered design will be required for securing the tank.
8. Propane tank is in Lahar Zone.
Reviewer Comments:
Engineering Review
Comments
07/14/2023
07/11/2023
Reviewer:
Corrections:
Correction 1:
See Document Markup
Comments:
If list approach is used for BMP selection, document BMP considerations by citing feasibility criteria in the Manaul. [Drainage Report, Page 1]
Correction 2:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Design Storm using the 2019 Ecology Manual adopted by the City in July 2022. All storm comments will refer to the 2019 Manual as the "Ecology Manual." [Drainage Report, Page 1]
Correction 3:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Format drainage report per the Ecology Manual Volume III Section 3.2 Preparing a Stormwater Site Plan. Include all Sections. If section is inapplicable, document reasoning for inapplicability. If a Section is not needed for Preliminary Site Plan submittal, state the section will be provided in Civil Submittal. Sections to be completed for preliminary feasibility: a. Project Overview, b. Existing Conditions Summary, c. Offsite Analysis Report, d. Permanent Stormwater Control Plan, e. Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan, f. Special Reports and Studies [Drainage Report, Page 1]
Correction 4:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide a Table to reasonably estimate the quantity of
existing and proposed hard surface areas. Include
off-site areas. Use Impervious_Surface_Table included in CityView as a guide for what is needed to determine storm feasibility. [Drainage Report, Page 1]
Correction 5:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use Ecology Manual Figure I-3.1 Flowchart for determining requirements and include in the Drainage Report. All minimum requirements are anticipated to be required for all hard surfaces and converted vegetation areas. [Drainage Report, Page 2]
Correction 6:
See Document Markup
Comments:
•Preliminary feasibility/infeasibility testing for infiltration facilities shall be in accordance with the site analysis requirements of the Ecology Manual, Volume III, Chapter 3.2, specifically:
-Groundwater evaluation, continuous monitoring well during the wet weather months (December 1 through April 1).
-Hydraulic conductivity testing:
o If the development triggers Minimum Requirement #7 (flow control), if the site soils are consolidated, or is encumbered by a critical area a Small Scale Pilot Infiltration Tests (PIT) during the wet weather months (December 1 through April 1) is required.
o If the development does not trigger Minimum Requirement #7, is not encumbered by a critical area, and is located on soils unconsolidated by glacial advance, grain size analyses may be substituted for the Small Scale PIT test at the discretion of the review engineer.
-Testing to determine the hydraulic restriction layer.
-Mounding analysis may be required in accordance with Ecology Volume V Section 5.2.7.
[Drainage Report, Page 1]
Correction 7:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Site plan says 4,000 SF. Confirm total account of hard surface (Ie. Roof, sidewalks, pavements, gravel), [Drainage Report, Page 2]
Correction 8:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Storage tanks are not shown on plans. [Drainage Report, Page 2]
Correction 9:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Expand on how proposed storm design meets minimum requirements. [Drainage Report, Page 2]
Correction 10:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Reconsider BMPs for roof runoff. Stormwater will not be permitted to discharge directly onto City roads or into a City system without the prior approval of the City. [Drainage Report, Page 2]
Correction 11:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Place north arrow in top right hand corner. but scale bar underneath north arrow per City Design Standards Section 2.1 [Site Plan]
Correction 12:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Original comment: Include and label existing and proposed contours. Comment not addressed. Existing and proposed contours are required for preliminary site plan submital. Existing contour elevation labels are needed for existing contours that are shown. Existing contours run through proposed improvements which indicate proposed contours should be present. [Site Plan]
Correction 13:
See Document Markup
Comments:
show general drainage features like catch basins, pipes, BMPs, storm facilities. treatment and flow control systems, etc. [Site Plan]
Correction 14:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show offsite improvements. [Site Plan]
Correction 15:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout pavement types. [Site Plan]
Correction 16:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add existing and proposed surface area quantities. [Site Plan]
Correction 17:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show preliminary Grading [Site Plan]
Correction 18:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Trash enclosure required for new commercial facilities. See Design Standards Section 208 for storm related requirements. [Site Plan]
Correction 19:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show approximate locations of all existing and proposed utilities. [Site Plan]
Correction 20:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add Vicinity Map to lower right hand side of Site Plan. [Site Plan]
Correction 21:
See Document Markup
Comments:
label and dimension property/ROW lines and easements. [Site Plan]
Correction 22:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add brief legal description including quarter, section, range under vicinity map [Site Plan]
Correction 23:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add lot size in square feet and acres. [Site Plan]
Correction 24:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show adjacent property zoning. [Site Plan]
Correction 25:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show owner/developer's name, address, and phone number in the title block. [Site Plan]
Correction 26:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show owner/developer's name, address, and phone number in the title block. [Site Plan]
Correction 27:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show flowpath arrows. [Site Plan]
Correction 28:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Site and Utility plan shows Jelly fish filter on the other side of the tanks. [Site Plan]
Correction 29:
See Document Markup
Comments:
This should be a public easement [Site Plan]
Correction 30:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add approximate cut/fill quantities [Site and Utility Plan Pg 1]
Correction 31:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per Section 200.1, "Public right of way runoff shall be detained and treated independently from the private stormwater facilities." [Site and Utility Plan Pg 1]
Correction 32:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Storm service must exit perpendicular to ROW. [Site and Utility Plan Pg 2]
Correction 33:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Original comment: Include and label existing and proposed contours. Comment not addressed. Existing and proposed contours are required for preliminary site plan submital. Existing contour elevation labels are needed for existing contours that are shown. Existing contours run through proposed improvements which indicate proposed contours should be present. [Site and Utility Plan Pg 2]
Correction 34:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Discharges to the city system shall discharge into a catch basin or approved equal on private property then into a structure such as a catch basin or manhole. You can relocate the control structure to the property line to achieve this. [Site and Utility Plan Pg 2]
Correction 35:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Up-size storm line from 8" to 12" [Site and Utility Plan Pg 2]
Correction 36:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Create a transition between new pavement width and existing pavement width to the north " [Site and Utility Plan Pg 2]
Correction 37:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Catch basin numbers and inverts do not match what is shown on plans. [Site and Utility Plan Pg 2]
Correction 38:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide estimated finished floor elevation of building. [Site and Utility Plan Pg 2]
Correction 39:
See Document Markup
Comments:
During Civil permit, provide design and calculations that enables the tank design to overcome buoyancy forces from high groundwater. [Storm Report page 7]
Correction 40:
See Document Markup
Comments:
If Storage tanks are proposed, use the storage tank BMP element from WWHM. [WWHM]
Correction 41:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Offsite improvements exceed 2,000 square feet and will need to be mitigated per the 2019 Manual using separate off site BMPs and facilities. [Storm Report page 1]
Correction 42:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Correct scale label [Site and Utility Plan pg 1]
Correction 43:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Adjust sheets to size 24x36 [Site and Utility Plan Pg 1]
Correction 44:
See Document Markup
Comments:
label new water as 12" DI [Site and Utility Plan Pg 2]
Correction 45:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Identify existing water and sewer pipe size and material [Site and Utility Plan]
Correction 46:
See Document Markup
Comments:
dimension pipe distances from each other and from centerline [Site and Utility Plan]
Correction 47:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Correct scale label [Site and Utility Plan Pg 2]
Reviewer Comments:
Engineering Traffic Review
VOID
07/14/2023
07/11/2023
Reviewer:
Corrections:
Correction 1:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show preliminary locations for street lighting and service cabinet {Site Plan Sheet 1.1p}
Correction 2:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Not at ROW Centerline
{Site Plan Sheet 1.1p}
Correction 3:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per previous comment, Face of Curb shall be 17ft from ROW centerline. {Site Plan Sheet 1.1p}
Correction 4:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per previous comment, Planter strip must be 7.5ft per city standard. {Site plan sheet 1.1P}
Correction 5:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per previous comment, Provide Auto-turn analysis for largest anticipated design vehicle. Show proposed driveway design can accommodate largest anticipated design vehicle
{Site plan sheet 1.1p}
Correction 6:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Gates must meet Peirce County standard and comply with Fire Code
{Site Plan sheet 1.1p}
Correction 7:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Has a Sight Distance analysis been done?
What type street trees planned? Potential to limit sight distance
{Site Plan Sheet 1.1P}
Correction 8:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
Existing power pole mounted street light on 23rd ST SE is sub standard requiring installation of a new City Standard street light
Per PMC 11.08.135
Include a separate street light design page with civil submittal.
Correction 9:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
Park Impact fees:
For ML zoning, Park impact fees are required. This will be $0.87 per sqft.
3,705 sqft * 0.87 = $3,223.35
Reviewer Comments:
Building Review
No Comments
07/14/2023
07/06/2023
Reviewer:
Corrections:
Correction 1:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
Would need to provide the required electrical vehicle charging spots per WAC 51-50-0429 and all related items for both the accessible parking and regular parking spots.
Reviewer Comments:
Engineering Traffic Review
Comments
07/14/2023
06/02/2023
Reviewer:
Corrections:
Correction 1:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show preliminary locations for street lighting and service cabinet {Site Plan Sheet 1.1p}
Carried Forward on (Preliminary Site Plan - 0515 A1_1P)
Correction 2:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Not at ROW Centerline
{Site Plan Sheet 1.1p}
Correction 3:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per previous comment, Face of Curb shall be 17ft from ROW centerline. {Site Plan Sheet 1.1p}
Correction 4:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per previous comment, Planter strip must be 7.5ft per city standard. {Site plan sheet 1.1P}
Correction 5:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per previous comment, Provide Auto-turn analysis for largest anticipated design vehicle. Show proposed driveway design can accommodate largest anticipated design vehicle
{Site plan sheet 1.1p}
Correction 6:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Gates must meet Peirce County standard and comply with Fire Code
{Site Plan sheet 1.1p}
Correction 7:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Has a Sight Distance analysis been done?
What type street trees planned? Potential to limit sight distance
{Site Plan Sheet 1.1P}
Correction 8:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
Traffic Scoping - Is a Dispenser planned for retail sales?
Correction 9:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
Per 0515 GENESEE CIVIL CORRECTION RESPONSE - Existing power pole mounted street light on 23rd ST SE is sub standard requiring installation of a new City Standard street light and cabinet
Per PMC 11.08.135
Include a separate street light design page with civil submittal.
Preliminary Site Plan - C4
Correction 10:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
Park Impact fees:
For ML zoning, Park impact fees are required. This will be $0.87 per sqft.
3,705 sqft * 0.87 = $3,223.35
Reviewer Comments:
Engineering Traffic Review
Revisions Required
12/17/2022
01/17/2023
Reviewer:
Corrections:
Correction 1:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show preliminary locations for street lighting and service cabinet {Site Plan Sheet 1.1p}
Correction 2:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Not at ROW Centerline
{Site Plan Sheet 1.1p}
Correction 3:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per previous comment, Face of Curb shall be 17ft from ROW centerline. {Site Plan Sheet 1.1p}
Correction 4:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per previous comment, Planter strip must be 7.5ft per city standard. {Site plan sheet 1.1P}
Correction 5:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per previous comment, Provide Auto-turn analysis for largest anticipated design vehicle. Show proposed driveway design can accommodate largest anticipated design vehicle
{Site plan sheet 1.1p}
Correction 6:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Gates must meet Peirce County standard and comply with Fire Code
{Site Plan sheet 1.1p}
Correction 7:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Has a Sight Distance analysis been done?
What type street trees planned? Potential to limit sight distance
{Site Plan Sheet 1.1P}
Correction 8:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
Traffic Scoping - Is a Dispenser planned for retail sales?
Reviewer Comments:
Engineering Review
Revisions Required
12/17/2022
12/14/2022
Reviewer:
Corrections:
Correction 1:
See Document Markup
Comments:
If list approach is used for BMP selection, document BMP considerations by citing feasibility criteria in the Manaul. [Drainage Report, Page 1]
Correction 2:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Design Storm using the 2019 Ecology Manual adopted by the City in July 2022. All storm comments will refer to the 2019 Manual as the "Ecology Manual." [Drainage Report, Page 1]
Correction 3:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Format drainage report per the Ecology Manual Volume III Section 3.2 Preparing a Stormwater Site Plan. Include all Sections. If section is inapplicable, document reasoning for inapplicability. If a Section is not needed for Preliminary Site Plan submittal, state the section will be provided in Civil Submittal. Sections to be completed for preliminary feasibility: a. Project Overview, b. Existing Conditions Summary, c. Offsite Analysis Report, d. Permanent Stormwater Control Plan, e. Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan, f. Special Reports and Studies [Drainage Report, Page 1]
Correction 4:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide a Table to reasonably estimate the quantity of
existing and proposed hard surface areas. Include
off-site areas. Use Impervious_Surface_Table included in CityView as a guide for what is needed to determine storm feasibility. [Drainage Report, Page 1]
Correction 5:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use Ecology Manual Figure I-3.1 Flowchart for determining requirements and include in the Drainage Report. All minimum requirements are anticipated to be required for all hard surfaces and converted vegetation areas. [Drainage Report, Page 2]
Correction 6:
See Document Markup
Comments:
•Preliminary feasibility/infeasibility testing for infiltration facilities shall be in accordance with the site analysis requirements of the Ecology Manual, Volume III, Chapter 3.2, specifically:???????????? ??????????? ?????????? ?????????? ???? ?????? ??? ??? ??????? ?????? ????????? ??????? ????? ??
-Hydraulic conductivity testing:? ?? ??? ??????????? ???????? ??????? ??????????? ?? ????? ????????? ?? ??? ???? ????? ??? ????????????? ?? ?? ?????????? ?? ? ???????? ???? ? ????? ????? ????? ???????????? ????? ????? ?????? ??? ??? ??????? ?????? ????????? ??????? ????? ? ?? ?????????
o If the development does not trigger Minimum Requirement #7, is not encumbered by a critical area, and is located on soils unconsolidated by glacial advance, grain size analyses may be substituted for the Small Scale PIT test at the discretion of the review engineer.???????? ?? ????????? ??? ????????? ??????????? ??????
-Mounding analysis may be required in accordance with Ecology Volume V Section 5.2.7. ????????? ??????? ???? ?
Correction 7:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Site plan says 4,000 SF. Confirm total account of hard surface (Ie. Roof, sidewalks, pavements, gravel), [Drainage Report, Page 2]
Correction 8:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Storage tanks are not shown on plans. [Drainage Report, Page 2]
Correction 9:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Expand on how proposed storm design meets minimum requirements. [Drainage Report, Page 2]
Correction 10:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Reconsider BMPs for roof runoff. Stormwater will not be permitted to discharge directly onto City roads or into a City system without the prior approval of the City. [Drainage Report, Page 2]
Correction 11:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Place north arrow in top right hand corner. but scale bar underneath north arrow per City Design Standards Section 2.1 [Site Plan]
Correction 12:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Include and label existing and proposed contours [Site Plan]
Correction 13:
See Document Markup
Comments:
show general drainage features like catch basins, pipes, BMPs, storm facilities. treatment and flow control systems, etc. [Site Plan]
Correction 14:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show offsite improvements. [Site Plan]
Correction 15:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout pavement types. [Site Plan]
Correction 16:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add existing and proposed surface area quantities. [Site Plan]
Correction 17:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show preliminary Grading [Site Plan]
Correction 18:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Trash enclosure required for new commercial facilities. See Design Standards Section 208 for storm related requirements. [Site Plan]
Correction 19:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show approximate locations of all existing and proposed utilities. [Site Plan]
Correction 20:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add Vicinity Map to lower right hand side of Site Plan. [Site Plan]
Correction 21:
See Document Markup
Comments:
label and dimension property/ROW lines and easements. [Site Plan]
Correction 22:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add brief legal description including quarter, section, range under vicinity map [Site Plan]
Correction 23:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add lot size in square feet and acres. [Site Plan]
Correction 24:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show adjacent property zoning. [Site Plan]
Correction 25:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show owner/developer's name, address, and phone number in the title block. [Site Plan]
Correction 26:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show owner/developer's name, address, and phone number in the title block. [Site Plan]
Correction 27:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show flowpath arrows. [Site Plan]
Reviewer Comments:
Fire Review
Revisions Required
12/17/2022
12/14/2022
Reviewer:
Corrections:
Correction 1:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
As per the pre-application requirements, please show new fire hydrant on site plans. Permit # PLPRE20220046 item number one and four.
1. A fire hydrant will be required on 23rd street SE.
2. Propane tanks will need to comply with NFPA, IBC, and IFC.
3. Comply with all State codes.
4. A fire sprinkler system will be determined by water availability at the new fire hydrant.
5. Electronic gates will require battery backup and KNOX override for fire department access.
6. Propane tank will be required to be anchored to a footing or slab.
7. If the Propane tank is underground an engineered design will be required for securing the tank.
8. Propane tank is in Lahar Zone.
Reviewer Comments:
Building Review
Revisions Required
12/17/2022
12/08/2022
Reviewer:
Corrections:
Correction 1:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
Would need to provide the required electrical vehicle charging spots per WAC 51-50-0429 and all related items for both the accessible parking and regular parking spots.
Reviewer Comments:
Planning Review
Revisions Required
12/17/2022
12/06/2022
Reviewer:
Corrections:
Correction 1:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Irrigation not allowed in ROW Planter Strips [Irrigation Plan, Sheet I1]
Correction 2:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Label North, South, and East perimeter landscaping areas at "Type III Landscaping" [Landscape Plan, Sheet L1}
Correction 3:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Label planter strips in ROW as "Planter Strip" [Landscape Plan, Sheet L1]
Correction 4:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Label west perimeter landscape area directly abutting building as "Type SLD-01 Landscaping" [Landscape Plan, Sheet L1]
Correction 5:
See Document Markup
Comments:
What will the area around the tank be used for? Please identify on the site plan [Landscape Plan, Sheet L1]
Correction 6:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Label and show all existing and proposed utilities on the preliminary landscape plan. No utility lines shall pass under required landscape planters unless justification is provided demonstrating that no feasible alternative exists [Landscape Plan, Sheet L1]
Correction 7:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Irrigation missing from east perimeter landscaping area [Irrigation Plan, Sheet I1]
Correction 8:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Sidewalk must be shifted to abut property line. Landscape planter shall be widened where necessary to fill in the roadway section [Site plan, Sheet 1.1p]
Correction 9:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Perimeter parking lot landscape islands must be 12ft in width and the depth of the abutting parking stall [Landscape Plan, Sheet L1]
Correction 10:
See Document Markup
Comments:
The max building height shall be equal to the proposed building setback within the first 35 ft of setback from the adjoining public street. The max building height may be increased by 1.5 ft for each additional foot of setback in excess of 35 ft up to the max. Building heights withing required setbacks shall be measured from the grade of the public sidewalk or centerline of the public street adjoining the site. [Elevations, Sheet 2.1P]
Correction 11:
See Document Markup
Comments:
What is the area to the north of the building to be used for? [Site Plan, Sheet 1.1P]
Correction 12:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
6 ft tall wood or opaque fence shall be added 20ft from the front property line extending across the entire frontage (except where driveways conflict), to obscure the view from the ROW of the tank storage areas. The fence shall further extend around the rest of the perimeter of the site to further obscure the tanks from adjacent properties.
Correction 13:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
All portions of a lot not devoted to building, future building, parking, access drives, walks, storage or accessory uses shall be landscaped in a manner consistent with the VMS and PMC 20.58.
Correction 14:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
Contact at Pierce County Department of Emergency Management is Joshua Atkins, his email is Joshua.atkins@piercecountywa.gov. Puyallup lahar evacuation routes are available at https://www.epiceoc.com/pages/lahar.
Reviewer Comments:
External Agency Review
Revisions Required
12/17/2022
12/02/2022
Reviewer:
Corrections:
Correction 1:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
Exemption from Construction Prohibition Request: The subject property is located within a volcanic hazard area. Per Puyallup Municipal Code 21.06.1260 hazardous facilities such as bulk propane plants are not allowed in these areas without an exemption from the Development & Permitting Services Director. Submitted exemption request letter requires additional changes and supporting information to be processed.
Correction 2:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
Exemption request letter: provide calculations for how you determined that the propane tanks will not move during a lahar event. Please provide evidence that an acceptable engineering method was used for these calculations. Provide sources for physics forces used.
Correction 3:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
Exemption request letter: Provide clarification as to how the propane tanks will be 'surrounded by water' during a lahar event.
Correction 4:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
Exemption Request Letter: The project appears to propose storage area for smaller propane tanks. Will these tanks be stored while full or empty? These smaller tanks will need to be anchored or stored in such a way as to prevent them from floating away during a lahar event.
Correction 5:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
Exemption Request Letter: Provide FEMA, USGS, or other regulatory guidance on Lahar or other equivalent natural disaster physics forces used in calculations.
Correction 6:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
Exemption Request Letter: Per PMC 21.06.1260 (a) one of the findings for approval of a hazardous facility construction exemption is "That the critical facility has a satisfactory critical alert notification system in place which coordinates with local and regional emergency monitoring systems". Please provide Letters of acknowledgement from the Pierce County Department of Emergency Management and/or Washington State Emergency Management Division regarding coordination of the on-site emergency notification system with one or both of these agencies.
Correction 7:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
Exemption Request Letter: Provide a written evacuation plan which is coordinated with the City of Puyallup adopted emergency evacuation plan to provide a route from the site to the City’s adopted evacuation routes. The City Emergency Manager will review this plan to ensure conformance with City standards.
Correction 8:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
Exemption Request Letter: Provide all manuals and plans referenced in the exemption request letter for City Review. Provide details of how evacuation drills will be conducted.
Correction 9:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
Reviewer Comments: