| Review Type |
Outcome |
Est. Completion Date |
Completed |
|
Engineering Traffic Review
|
Approved
|
11/13/2024
|
11/19/2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
Coordinate with David Drake regarding the proposed fire lane pavement markings/striping/curb paint etc. City code has specific requirements for fire lanes.
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
Streetlighting plan not provided with submittal. However, it's my understanding the design is underway and will be submitted with next civil submittal.
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
Design for signal pole relocation and 35ft radius have not been submitted to the City. However, it's my understanding the design is underway and will be submitted with next civil submittal.
|
|
|
|
|
Public Works Streets Review
|
Approved
|
11/13/2024
|
11/18/2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comment
I do not see a streetlighting submittal
|
|
|
See Document Markup
these are regulatory signs, should not be removed, should be displayed during construction C 1.0 SH
|
|
|
See Document Markup
expand the grind/overlay to encompass this area C 2.0 SH
|
|
|
See Document Markup
WSDOT Field guide states when pedestrian path crosses a curb ramp from the side a flared side is needed C 2.0 SH, WSDOT examples show a non walking surface or buffer
|
|
|
See Document Markup
remove C curb C 2.0 SH
|
|
|
See Document Markup
should be clear the grind/overlay goes to the curb & gutter C 2.0 SH
|
|
|
See Document Markup
driveway should be dense concrete, this appears to show the ramps dense but not the driving surface C2.0 SH
|
|
|
See Document Markup
with this very wide sidewalk why is there one bench right next to the curb, should be moved, this impedes pedestrian flow, shows more in the middle in the landscape plans C 2.0 SH
|
|
|
See Document Markup
include these crosswalk bars as the grind/overlay is expanded C 2.3 SH
|
|
|
See Document Markup
remove c curb and end treatments C2.3 SH
|
|
|
See Document Markup
WSDOT Standard Plans F-45.10-04 states if this is more than 5' DWS should be at back of curb C 3.0 SH
|
|
|
See Document Markup
|
|
|
See Document Markup
6.9'
|
|
|
See Document Markup
9.9'
|
|
|
See Document Markup
|
|
|
See Document Markup
|
|
|
See Document Markup
|
|
|
See Document Markup
|
|
|
See Document Markup
|
|
|
See Document Markup
|
|
|
See Document Markup
|
|
|
See Document Markup
|
|
|
See Document Markup
|
|
|
|
|
Public Works Streets Review
|
Approved
|
04/22/2024
|
11/18/2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comment
I do not see a streetlighting submittal
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Civil Review
|
Approved
|
11/13/2024
|
11/14/2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Document Markup
The post dedication property line is not shown here, or it does not match what we have in GIS. We are unclear as to whether or not the storm infrastructure to be abandoned or removed is completely in the ROW after dedication, but most of it is. The project should consider removing it completely. If the Manhole is abandoned in place it shall be done to WSDOT Standard Specification 7-05.3(2) and this shall be communicated to the contractor on the plans or in the notes.[CIVIL PLANS - RESUB, Sheet 1.0]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Update this description. [Stormwater Maintenance and Source Control Plan, Page 5/35]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
This is incorrect. Apartment buildings are classified as commercial facilities for stormwater maintenance. [Stormwater Maintenance and Source Control Plan, Page 7/35]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Specify sanitary pipe material. Include in cost estimate. [CIVIL PLANS - RESUB, Sheet C4.0]
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
The Engineering Cost Estimate needs to be revised again due to design changes. Using the previously marked up version from City View (Cost Estimate_2nd Ave Apts_PRCCP20240232 annotated), the following changes shall be made:
ON-SITE STORM DRAINAGE
Catch Basin Type 1 - revise to 7
6" PVC - revise to 115 LF
ON-SITE SANITARY
Terminal Clean Out - revise to 1 or provide locations of other clean outs on Utility Plan
8" PIPE - depending on material (see previous mark up) correct the unit price
OFF-SITE STREET
Confirm Gravel Base and Asphalt Concrete numbers based on current paving plan
Include accurate street light count based on forthcoming illumination plan
OFF-SITE STORM
Include right of way STORM construction items and materials
OFF-SITE WATER
Revise to 3 - 6" Gate Valves and ensure all 3 are called out on the plans
6" PVC - revise to 43 LF
ON SITE SANITARY
8" PIPE - depending on material (see previous mark up) correct the unit price. Ensure the total of on and off site sewer pipe totals 38 LF as shown on current plan.
In order to avoid another submittal it is important to get this estimate correct. Make sure you are using the marked up version (Cost Estimate_2nd Ave Apts_PRCCP20240232 annotated) as a base for these corrections or they will not make sense. Please call or email if there are questions prior to submittal, so that we work out any discrepensies prior to review. It will probably be necessary to fill out a new version of the cost estimate, but the annotated numbers (in red) with these corrections should be used.
|
|
|
|
|
Fire Review
|
Approved
|
11/13/2024
|
11/12/2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
• Fire apparatus access roads shall not exceed 10 percent in grade. Entrance/Exits do not show the grades, based on previous layouts this will be an issue unless the site is being filled?
• The angles of approach and departure for fire apparatus access roads shall be within the limits established by the fire code official based on the fire departments apparatus.
• Please address how the grading / filling will accommodate these requirements.
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
Correction response letter was not filled out. Please address Fire Review comments in previous review.
|
|
|
|
|
Public Works Water Review
|
Approved
|
11/13/2024
|
10/24/2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Resub Civil C4.0: Call out 6-inch wet tap with stainless steel tapping sleeve>
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Resub Civil C4.0: The City does not allow deduct meters. Install a brass tee before the 2-inch domestic meter, and pipe to a 5/8-inch irrigation meter with 3/4-inch DCVA.
|
|
|
|
|
Public Works Collection Review
|
Approved
|
11/13/2024
|
10/23/2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Planning Review
|
Approved
|
11/13/2024
|
10/22/2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Civil Review
|
Failed
|
08/23/2024
|
09/06/2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
Under the previous permit (PRCCP20220417) reviewer mark ups were added to the submitted Fee Calculation Cost Estimate. The reviewer comment advised that if there were no objections to these corrections then there was no need to resubmit. The estimate was resubmitted with the pre-edit numbers. For the next submittal either correct the estimate with the reviewers numbers or provide commentary on which numbers were not changed and why. Submit cost estimate that reflects this work or, if you agree with the corrections, the annotated version can just be submitted. You can find the annotated Fee Calculation Cost Estimate uploaded to Documents & Images under this permit.
|
|
|
See Document Markup
There are 2 number fours on Sheet C3.1. [CIVIL PLANS, Sheet C3.0]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide legend this sheet or label pervious concrete areas on Grading and Drainage Plan. [CIVIL PLANS, Sheet C3.0]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Label as STORMFILTER CATCH BASIN as was done with #7. [CIVIL PLANS, Sheet C3.0]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Clarify intent of infiltration/gravel ditch. Is this just for the run off from the slope east of the curbing? [CIVIL PLANS, Sheet C3.0]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
The post dedication property line is not shown here, or it does not match what we have in GIS. We are unclear as to whether or not the storm infrastructure to be abandoned or removed is completely in the ROW after dedication, but most of it is. The project should consider removing it completely. If the Manhole is abandoned in place it shall be done to WSDOT Standard Specification 7-05.3(2) and this shall be communicated to the contractor on the plans or in the notes.[CIVIL PLANS - RESUB, Sheet 1.0]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Update this description. [Stormwater Maintenance and Source Control Plan, Page 5/35]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
This is incorrect. Apartment buildings are classified as commercial facilities for stormwater maintenance. [Stormwater Maintenance and Source Control Plan, Page 7/35]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Specify sanitary pipe material. Include in cost estimate. [CIVIL PLANS - RESUB, Sheet C4.0]
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
The Engineering Cost Estimate needs to be revised again due to design changes. Using the previously marked up version from City View (Cost Estimate_2nd Ave Apts_PRCCP20240232 annotated), the following changes shall be made:
ON-SITE STORM DRAINAGE
Catch Basin Type 1 - revise to 7
6" PVC - revise to 115 LF
ON-SITE SANITARY
Terminal Clean Out - revise to 1 or provide locations of other clean outs on Utility Plan
8" PIPE - depending on material (see previous mark up) correct the unit price
OFF-SITE STREET
Confirm Gravel Base and Asphalt Concrete numbers based on current paving plan
Include accurate street light count based on forthcoming illumination plan
OFF-SITE STORM
Include right of way STORM construction items and materials
OFF-SITE WATER
Revise to 3 - 6" Gate Valves and ensure all 3 are called out on the plans
6" PVC - revise to 43 LF
ON SITE SANITARY
8" PIPE - depending on material (see previous mark up) correct the unit price. Ensure the total of on and off site sewer pipe totals 38 LF as shown on current plan.
In order to avoid another submittal it is important to get this estimate correct. Make sure you are using the marked up version (Cost Estimate_2nd Ave Apts_PRCCP20240232 annotated) as a base for these corrections or they will not make sense. Please call or email if there are questions prior to submittal, so that we work out any discrepensies prior to review. It will probably be necessary to fill out a new version of the cost estimate, but the annotated numbers (in red) with these corrections should be used.
|
|
|
|
|
Public Works Streets Review
|
Failed
|
08/23/2024
|
09/05/2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comment
I do not see a streetlighting submittal
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Traffic Review
|
Failed
|
08/23/2024
|
09/04/2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
Executed deferred improvement agreement required prior to civil approval.
-Agreement shall include a construction easement for the future replacement of substandard curb radius (with a city standard 35ft radius) and modifications to traffic signal.
Streetlighting plan not provided with submittal.
Landscaping plan not consistent with updated site plan.
Provide an updated AutoTurn exhibit based on the updated site plan.
Channelization plan does not provide details for fire lane signage/striping.
Consistent with previously approved Civil design, provide on-site loading zone.
Proposed parking stalls on the south side of the commercial driveway throat are too close to the 2nd St NE driveway. Vehicles maneuvering these parking spaces will likely cause inbound blocking events that will have an undesirable effect on traffic.
Existing signal pole is located within proposed wheelchair ramp with vertical curb surrounding the pole base. Verify this meets current ADA/PROWAG guidlines.
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
Coordinate with David Drake regarding the proposed fire lane pavement markings/striping/curb paint etc. City code has specific requirements for fire lanes.
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
Streetlighting plan not provided with submittal. However, it's my understanding the design is underway and will be submitted with next civil submittal.
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
Design for signal pole relocation and 35ft radius have not been submitted to the City. However, it's my understanding the design is underway and will be submitted with next civil submittal.
|
|
|
|
|
Public Works Collection Review
|
Approved
|
08/23/2024
|
09/03/2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Document Markup
From this point, it is the preference of the collections division that the 12 inch stormwater piping be relocated to the right of way and discharged, continuing west to 2nd St NE, to a new structure. The ability to repair, replace or maintain the existing stormwater system in its current location would be greatly impacted with the proposed building structure so close. The then abandoned, existing pipes and manhole should be removed. [Civil Plans, C3.0]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
The sanitary lateral tap should be on the main and not to the manhole. [Civil Plans, C4.0]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Sanitary connection not shown on plans with sampling tee configuration. Will there be enough room to install behind RoW? [Civil Plans, C4.0]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
If new driveway approach places CB outside of stormwater gutter collection path, relocate as needed. [Civil Plans, C3.0]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Existing CB buried under vegetation, clear area or raise to grade. Vegetation setbacks will need to apply. [Civil Plans, C3.0]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Trash enclosure shows slope to SFCB and no sanitary connection located in area. [Civil Plans, C3.0]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Utility easement also includes private sanitary lateral for 601 2nd St NE, not surveyed on plans. [Civil Plans, C4.0]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
CB currently has a horizontal grate. Update lid and frame if needed to current standard. [Civil Plans, C3.0]
|
|
|
|
|
Public Works Water Review
|
Failed
|
08/23/2024
|
08/13/2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Civil Sheet C4.0: Since all wet taps will be on 8-inch cast iron pipe, call out 6-inch wet tap with stainless steel tapping sleeve.
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Civil Sheet C4.0: This fire hydrant should be tapped off the looped 8-inch cast iron water main on 5th Ave NE instead of off the proposed fire line feed line. This will greatly increase the available fire flow to this hydrant compared to branching from a dead-end 6-inch line. If the hydrant were off the dead-end 6-inch line, the available fire flow would be further reduced if the proposed sprinkler system was activated.
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Civil Sheet C4.0: Both water services should be tapped off the 8-inch cast iron water main on 5th Ave NE, and the meters should be placed at back of sidewalk out of a hard surface. Both backflow assemblies should be placed out of city right of way.
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Resub Civil C4.0: Call out 6-inch wet tap with stainless steel tapping sleeve>
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Resub Civil C4.0: The City does not allow deduct meters. Install a brass tee before the 2-inch domestic meter, and pipe to a 5/8-inch irrigation meter with 3/4-inch DCVA.
|
|
|
|
|
Planning Review
|
Approved
|
08/23/2024
|
08/12/2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Planning Correction
LANDSCAPING: The landscape plan sheets do not match the civil plan sheets (parking configuration is different). Please update to the correct plan sheets
LANDSCAPING: Provide approval from Pierce Transit for stop location. The bus stop improvements appear to be on private property (back of walk) on some plan sheets but near the curb line on other plan sheets. Contact Tina Vaslet at tvaslet@piercetransit.org.
LANDSCAPING: Shown sight distance triangle near both driveways to ensure tree and shrub selection near driveways does not conflict.
LANDSCAPING: Add daffodils to planter cut outs in the ROW and the foundation line landscaping along both west and south sides of the building. See section 7.4 (daffodils) of 2022 VMS manual https://www.cityofpuyallup.org/DocumentCenter/View/17925/Vegetation-Management-Standards-VMS-2022
LANDSCAPING: Please provide a response and revised plans demonstrating compliance with the options to reduce the parking lot landscaping islands down to 8 feet in width. See Type IV standards in VMS, section A(4). "Type IV landscape islands may be reduced in width if an equal dimension of the reduced landscaping island is replaced with under pavement soil cells. In no event shall a landscape island be reduced to less than eight (8) feet in width. Structural plant soils – often called “CU-structural soil”, or equivalent - may be provided in lieu of structural soil cells so long as the volume of structural plant soils provided is 1.5X the soil volume that would otherwise be provided in structural soil cells as required by this option to reduce design option. The project landscape architect shall provide a cross section detail of installation of all structural plant soils, including geotechnical interface with adjacent under pavement soils.
|
|
|
|
|
Fire Review
|
Failed
|
08/23/2024
|
08/07/2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
• Fire apparatus access roads shall not exceed 10 percent in grade. Entrance/Exits do not show the grades, based on previous layouts this will be an issue unless the site is being filled?
• The angles of approach and departure for fire apparatus access roads shall be within the limits established by the fire code official based on the fire departments apparatus.
• Please address how the grading / filling will accommodate these requirements.
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
Correction response letter was not filled out. Please address Fire Review comments in previous review.
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Traffic Review
|
Failed
|
04/22/2024
|
04/22/2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
Executed deferred improvement agreement required prior to civil approval.
-Agreement shall include a construction easement for the future replacement of substandard curb radius (with a city standard 35ft radius) and modifications to traffic signal.
Streetlighting plan not provided with submittal.
Landscaping plan not consistent with updated site plan.
Provide an updated AutoTurn exhibit based on the updated site plan.
Channelization plan does not provide details for fire lane signage/striping.
Consistent with previously approved Civil design, provide on-site loading zone.
Proposed parking stalls on the south side of the commercial driveway throat are too close to the 2nd St NE driveway. Vehicles maneuvering these parking spaces will likely cause inbound blocking events that will have an undesirable effect on traffic.
Existing signal pole is located within proposed wheelchair ramp with vertical curb surrounding the pole base. Verify this meets current ADA/PROWAG guidlines.
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Civil Review
|
Failed
|
04/22/2024
|
04/19/2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
Under the previous permit (PRCCP20220417) reviewer mark ups were added to the submitted Fee Calculation Cost Estimate. The reviewer comment advised that if there were no objections to these corrections then there was no need to resubmit. The estimate was resubmitted with the pre-edit numbers. For the next submittal either correct the estimate with the reviewers numbers or provide commentary on which numbers were not changed and why. Submit cost estimate that reflects this work or, if you agree with the corrections, the annotated version can just be submitted. You can find the annotated Fee Calculation Cost Estimate uploaded to Documents & Images under this permit.
|
|
|
See Document Markup
There are 2 number fours on Sheet C3.1. [CIVIL PLANS, Sheet C3.0]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide legend this sheet or label pervious concrete areas on Grading and Drainage Plan. [CIVIL PLANS, Sheet C3.0]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Label as STORMFILTER CATCH BASIN as was done with #7. [CIVIL PLANS, Sheet C3.0]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Clarify intent of infiltration/gravel ditch. Is this just for the run off from the slope east of the curbing? [CIVIL PLANS, Sheet C3.0]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Update this
description. [Stormwater Maintenance and Source Control Plan, Page 5/35]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
This is incorrect. Apartment buildings are classified as commercial facilities for stormwater maintenance. [Stormwater Maintenance and Source Control Plan, Page 7/35]
|
|
|
|
|
Fire Review
|
Failed
|
04/22/2024
|
04/15/2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
• Fire apparatus access roads shall not exceed 10 percent in grade. Entrance/Exits do not show the grades, based on previous layouts this will be an issue unless the site is being filled?
• The angles of approach and departure for fire apparatus access roads shall be within the limits established by the fire code official based on the fire departments apparatus.
• Please address how the grading / filling will accommodate these requirements.
|
|
|
|
|
Public Works Collection Review
|
Failed
|
04/22/2024
|
04/15/2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Document Markup
From this point, it is the preference of the collections division that the 12 inch stormwater piping be relocated to the right of way and discharged, continuing west to 2nd St NE, to a new structure. The ability to repair, replace or maintain the existing stormwater system in its current location would be greatly impacted with the proposed building structure so close. The then abandoned, existing pipes and manhole should be removed. [Civil Plans, C3.0]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
The sanitary lateral tap should be on the main and not to the manhole. [Civil Plans, C4.0]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Sanitary connection not shown on plans with sampling tee configuration. Will there be enough room to install behind RoW? [Civil Plans, C4.0]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
If new driveway approach places CB outside of stormwater gutter collection path, relocate as needed. [Civil Plans, C3.0]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Existing CB buried under vegetation, clear area or raise to grade. Vegetation setbacks will need to apply. [Civil Plans, C3.0]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Trash enclosure shows slope to SFCB and no sanitary connection located in area. [Civil Plans, C3.0]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Utility easement also includes private sanitary lateral for 601 2nd St NE, not surveyed on plans. [Civil Plans, C4.0]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
CB currently has a horizontal grate. Update lid and frame if needed to current standard. [Civil Plans, C3.0]
|
|
|
|
|
Public Works Water Review
|
Failed
|
04/22/2024
|
04/04/2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Civil Sheet C4.0: Since all wet taps will be on 8-inch cast iron pipe, call out 6-inch wet tap with stainless steel tapping sleeve.
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Civil Sheet C4.0: This fire hydrant should be tapped off the looped 8-inch cast iron water main on 5th Ave NE instead of off the proposed fire line feed line. This will greatly increase the available fire flow to this hydrant compared to branching from a dead-end 6-inch line. If the hydrant were off the dead-end 6-inch line, the available fire flow would be further reduced if the proposed sprinkler system was activated.
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Civil Sheet C4.0: Both water services should be tapped off the 8-inch cast iron water main on 5th Ave NE, and the meters should be placed at back of sidewalk out of a hard surface. Both backflow assemblies should be placed out of city right of way.
|
|
|
|
|
Planning Review
|
Failed
|
04/22/2024
|
03/13/2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Planning Correction
LANDSCAPING: The landscape plan sheets do not match the civil plan sheets (parking configuration is different). Please update to the correct plan sheets
LANDSCAPING: Provide approval from Pierce Transit for stop location. The bus stop improvements appear to be on private property (back of walk) on some plan sheets but near the curb line on other plan sheets. Contact Tina Vaslet at tvaslet@piercetransit.org.
LANDSCAPING: Shown sight distance triangle near both driveways to ensure tree and shrub selection near driveways does not conflict.
LANDSCAPING: Add daffodils to planter cut outs in the ROW and the foundation line landscaping along both west and south sides of the building. See section 7.4 (daffodils) of 2022 VMS manual https://www.cityofpuyallup.org/DocumentCenter/View/17925/Vegetation-Management-Standards-VMS-2022
LANDSCAPING: Please provide a response and revised plans demonstrating compliance with the options to reduce the parking lot landscaping islands down to 8 feet in width. See Type IV standards in VMS, section A(4). "Type IV landscape islands may be reduced in width if an equal dimension of the reduced landscaping island is replaced with under pavement soil cells. In no event shall a landscape island be reduced to less than eight (8) feet in width. Structural plant soils – often called “CU-structural soil”, or equivalent - may be provided in lieu of structural soil cells so long as the volume of structural plant soils provided is 1.5X the soil volume that would otherwise be provided in structural soil cells as required by this option to reduce design option. The project landscape architect shall provide a cross section detail of installation of all structural plant soils, including geotechnical interface with adjacent under pavement soils.
|
|
|
|
