Review Type
Outcome
Est. Completion Date
Completed
External Agency Review
Comments
06/27/2024
07/31/2024
Reviewer:
Corrections:
Correction 1:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
Per comment from the Puyallup Tribe: The project is located in an area with known cultural resources and traditional use areas. This project has a high probability for encountering cultural resources important to the Puyallup Tribe. The Puyallup tribe is requesting an Archaeological survey be completed prior to this project beginning. The City of Puyallup will be honoring this request and a SEPA Mitigation measure outlining the requirements for the Archeological Survey will be included in the forthcoming SEPA Determination.
Correction 2:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
Revisions to the Habitat Assessment and wetland report are required. Figure 7 of the wetland report is corrupted and cannot be viewed correctly. See the two review letters from City's 3rd party review biologists dated March 31, 2023 for list of required changes.
Correction 3:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
Update for revised habitat assessment dated August 9, 2023: Updated Habitat Assessment continues to include items that need to be addressed or revised. Please review City document titled 'Bio-Assessment Review #2" for a list of review comments from the City's third party biologist for required changes to the biological assessment.
Reviewer Comments:
Engineering Traffic Review
Comments
06/27/2024
06/28/2024
Reviewer:
Corrections:
Correction 1:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
Per Puyallup Municipal Code Section 11.08.135, the applicant/owner would be expected to construct half-street improvements including curb, gutter, planter strip, sidewalk, roadway base, pavement, and street lighting. The extent of paving would be determined based on current condition. Any existing improvements which are damaged now or during construction, or which do not meet current City Standards, shall be replaced.
Correction 2:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
(2) City Standard Street Lights will be required along 25th ST SE Frontage
Correction 3:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
New Streetlight required at 21st ST SE / 7th AVE SE intersection
Correction 4:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
30ft wide commercial access required on 21st ST SE
Correction 5:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Remove obsolete curb cuts and show planned curb/gutter/sidewalk panels and planter strips
Site Plan pg A-0.1
Correction 6:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per City Standard 101.10.1 - Minimum driveway spacing standard not met
Site Plan pg A-0.1
Correction 7:
See Document Markup
Comments:
30ft wide commercial access required
Site Plan pg A-0.1
Correction 8:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
Correction 9:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide an Autoturn Analysis
Traffic Scoping
Correction 10:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
Submit sight distance analysis of the proposed driveways. Please provide photo documentation within the report of the sight distance analysis. The photo must show the location of the sight distance standard in the picture as well as the location of the viewer. If photo cannot be provided, plan sheets with plan and profile within the report can also provide the sight distance documentation. If this method is used, place the distance requirements as met on those documents and provide this information within the appendix of the report.
Sight Distance Analysis:
• Provided exhibit does not meet City standards.
• From face of curb, required setback is 14.5ft (driver’s eye)
• ESD requirements are 300ft
• Preliminary measurements show encroachment into adjacent private property. Applicant will be required to obtain sight distance easement from adjacent private property owner or shift 25th Street SE driveway ~50ft north to avoid sight obstruction.
25th St SE driveway
• Sidewalk transition on the south side encroaches into private property.
• Use drop approach (01.02.18)
• On the north side of driveway, transition sidewalk to meet existing.
Correction 11:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
Civil submittal shall include detailed striping/signage plan.
Correction 12:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show preliminary location of city standard street lighting
Site Plan pg A-0.1
• Show location of City standard streetlights. Existing PSE utility mounted lights do not meet City standards.
Correction 13:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Align driveway centerline with 7th AVE SE
Site Plan pg A-0.1
21st St SE driveway
• Use drop approach (01.02.18)
• Remove “jog” from on-site driveway. Driveway approach should be orthogonal as it approaches 21st St SE. This is shown correctly on the site plan, but incorrectly on the preliminary grading plans.
• During design, coordinate with City of Puyallup on the status of upcoming 7th Ave SE improvements. ADA ramps will be added to the east side of 21st St SE that must be compatible with design.
Correction 14:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coordinate with garbage service provider to assess proposed pickup locations
Site Plan pg A-0.1
Correction 15:
See Document Markup
Comments:
This garbage enclosure could cause sight distance obstructions for out bound vehicles
Relocate
Site Plan pg A-0.1
Correction 16:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
Park Impact Fee (Per residential dwelling Unit):
Less than 500 sqft $1,560.05
500 - 999 sqft $2,313.53
1,000 – 1,999 sqft $3,291.31
2,000 sqft or more $4,017.30
Correction 17:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
Traffic scoping:
• Project description: “Proposal to develop 7 parcels into senior housing consisting of 82 apartments units and 6 existing single-family units use as adult family homes.”
• Will there be additional senior housing units created from the (6) single-family homes?
• Please provide details on how (6) converted SFRs will access City ROW.
• Access points for this commercial facility must meet driveway spacing requirements (150ft). Consolidate driveways where necessary to meet City standards.
Correction 18:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
Landscaping plan not consistent with site plan.
Reviewer Comments:
Engineering Review
Comments
06/27/2024
06/27/2024
Reviewer:
Corrections:
Correction 1:
See Document Markup
Comments:
See CUP application required site plan information. [site plan]
Correction 2:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide survey bearings. [site plan]
Correction 3:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show water, sewer and stormwater mains witihin 21st and 25th St SE. [site plan]
Correction 4:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide a legend for the site plan. [site plan]
Correction 5:
See Document Markup
Comments:
The city has adopted the 2019 Ecology Manual. Revise the report reference. [drainage report, pg 1]
Correction 6:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide the right of way widths for 21st and 25th St SE. [site plan]
Correction 7:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show existing and proposed contours [site plan]
Correction 8:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show the regulated AE floodplain and base flood elevation. [site plan]
Correction 9:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide the cut and fill amounts proposed for the project. How is the project proposing to mitigate the 1:1 compensatory storage to floodplain impacts?
Correction 10:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide additional sheets showing preliminary grading, drainage and frontage/lighting plan.
Correction 11:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide preliminary floodplain information showing how the development will meet the equivalent elevation requirement for 1:1 fill to compensatory storage. See PMC 21.07.060. [Drainage Report]
Correction 12:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show the pedestrian access route from the public right of way to on-site structures. [site plan]
Correction 13:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Include the following flow charts within the preliminary drainage report: Figure III-1.1: Runoff Treatment BMP Selection Flow Chart and Figure I-3.5 Flow chart for determining wetland protection level requirements. [drainage report, pg 2].
Correction 14:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Is the geotech report still being modified? Why is this a draft? [drainage report, pg 46]
Correction 15:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show the proposed 40' wide wetland buffer. [site plan]
Correction 16:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
Correction 17:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Revise the reference to the 2005 WDOE manual to the currently adopted 2019 Ecology Manual. [Biological Assessment, pg 12]
Correction 18:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
The biological habitat assessment and preliminary storm report floodplain information conflicts. This area has been re-mapped by FEMA and is within the regulated AE floodplain with an established base flood elevation, revise accordingly.
Correction 19:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show proposed preliminary stormwater mitigation on a separate sheet. [site plan]
Correction 20:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per the critical area report, the wetland on the NE side of the development is deemed a category IV wetland with a habitat score greater than 5, provide additional information as to how the wetland will meet the following requirements of the DOE manual for Minimum Requirement 8: General Protection, Protection from Pollutants and Wetland Hydroperiod Protection (method 2) [drainage report, pg 4]
Correction 21:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per minimum requirement #7, the pre-developed site condition must be modeled as forested land cover unless reasonable, historic information is provided that indicates the site was prairie prior to settlement. Revise the calculation or provide additional information. [drainage report, pg 6]
Correction 22:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide a downstream analysis to ensure both onsite and off-site has capacity to convey at a minimum the 25 year storm flow event, assuming developed conditions for onsite tributary areas, and existing conditions for any offsite tributary areas. [drainage report, pg 3]
Correction 23:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide a basin map to supplement the flow control WWHM calculation. [drainage report, pg 8]
Correction 24:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Section 2.6.2 of the Volume 1 of the SMMWW requires: An initial qualitative analysis shall extend downstream for the entire flow path from the project site to the receiving water or up to one mile, whichever is less. If a receiving water is within one-quarter mile, the analysis shall extend within the receiving water to one-quarter mile from the project site. The analysis shall extend one-quarter mile beyond any improvements proposed as mitigation. The analysis must extend upstream to a point where any backwater effects created by the project cease. Upon review of the qualitative analysis, the local project reviewer may require that a quantitative analysis be performed. [drainage report, pg 3]
Correction 25:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show existing easements. There is a stream easement relocation agreement here. [site plan]
Correction 26:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide a preliminary frontage plan showing proposed improvements. The traffic pre-app notes indicated the following improvements: 25th St SE: 30' wide commercial access onto 25th St SE, 2 city standard streetlights, and replacing the existing curb cuts with curb, gutter and planting strips. 21st St SE: Provide a 30' commercial access approach and street light. [site plan]
Correction 27:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show on-site routing of water, sewer and storm utilities. [site plan, pg 1]
Correction 28:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide a basin map/additional information proving why the project can model 1.53 acres as pasture instead of forested for the pre-developed conditions. [drainage report, pg 64]
Correction 29:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide a table of contents to navigate the drainage report, pg 1]
Correction 30:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide a basin map to supplement the floodplain compensatory storage table. [drainage report, pg 9]
Correction 31:
See Document Markup
Comments:
The grading fill volume shown on the preliminary grading and storm plan does not match the total fill. The site plan shows 32,272CY of fill whereas, the total fill within this chart is about half of that at 15,200CY. [drainage report, pg 9]
Correction 32:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide a legend distinguishing existing vs proposed linetypes and hatches. [drainage plan, pg 1]
Correction 33:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide the right of way width for 25th St SE. [drainage plan, pg 1]
Correction 34:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide the right of way width for 21st St SE. [drainage plan, pg 1]
Correction 35:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide a map legend showing existing vs proposed linetypes and hatches. [site plan]
Correction 36:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show the water main located within 21st St SE. [drainage plan, pg 1]
Correction 37:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show the sewer main located within 21st St SE. [drainage plans, pg 1]
Correction 38:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide a map showing the downstream analysis. [drainage report, pg 11]
Correction 39:
See Document Markup
Comments:
A majority of the civil engineering comments were not addressed on the resubmittal, revise accordinly. [civils, pg 1]
Correction 40:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Street light spacing along 21st St SE is 300'. The existing streetlight is owned by PSE and does not meet city standards. Space 2 streetlights along 21st St SE. [drainage plans, pg 1]
Correction 41:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show the pedestrian access route from the public right of way to on-site structures. [site plan]
Correction 42:
See Document Markup
Comments:
The comment response letter states Figure I-3.1 apply to "converted vegetated areas", the figure on page 2 of the report states all minimum requiremenets apply to new and replaced hard surfaces. [drainage report, pg 6]
Correction 43:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Create an additional map to supplement the MR 7 table WWHM calculation. [drainage report, pg 64
Correction 44:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Distinguish the pre-developed and post-developed conditions on this map or create an additional map to supplement the MR 7 WWHM calculation. [drainage report, pg 64]
Correction 45:
See Document Markup
Comments:
The appendix of the Critical Areas Report Checklist - Wetlands rating form providing the wetland category and habitat score is missing. [Wetland Critical Area Report]
Correction 46:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide preliminary stormwater invert elevation information proving that the project will not need to pump from the outlet of the detention pond into E Pioneer. Meeting the flow control standard with a pump is very challenging. [drainage plans, pg 1]
Correction 47:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide rough volume amounts for each proposed detention system. [drainage plans, pg 1]
Correction 48:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide the relative finish floor elevation for each proposed structure. [drainage plans, pg 1]
Correction 49:
See Document Markup
Comments:
FYI, trash enclosure will need to be designed per design standard 208.1 at time of civils. [drainage plan, pg 1]
Correction 50:
See Document Markup
Comments:
The proposed compensatory storage volume must be preserved per Puyallup Municipal Code 21.07.060(f)(D). Provide a preservation tract or a draft easement. [drainage plan, pg 1]
Correction 51:
See Document Markup
Comments:
What elevation will the flood overflow pipe be installed? [drainage plans, pg 1]
Correction 52:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide a preliminary hydraulic analysis showing the there will be no downstream flooding. How is the dispersion trench sized? [drainage plan, pg 1]
Correction 53:
See Document Markup
Comments:
The compensatory storage area should be hydraulically connected to the source of flooding via a surface connection to the floodplain. A man-made pipe conveyance system can clog and be forgotten over time. Revise accordingly. [drainage plan, pg 1]
Correction 54:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide a preliminary pump size calculation. What size pumps are being proposed as well as the service line diameter? [drainage plan, pg 2]
Reviewer Comments:
Planning Review
Comments
06/27/2024
06/25/2024
Reviewer:
Corrections:
Correction 1:
Add Submittal Item: Lot Combo
Comments:
Additional Submittal Item Required: Lot Combination Permit Application required. Application form can be downloaded from the City website at https://www.cityofpuyallup.org/DocumentCenter/View/11646/Lot-Combination-Application. Combination of all lots that include buildings that cross property lines is required.
Correction 2:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
Show property lines on all site plans.
Correction 3:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
Max allowed square footage for FAR for project is 292,113 sf, please correct on site plan.
Correction 4:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
Correction 5:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Could a patio be added for each ground floor resident? [Sheet A-2.2]
Correction 6:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Where is the street side entrance with a connection to the sidewalk on 25th St SE? [Sheet A 2.2]
Correction 7:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
It is unclear exactly how the proposed design meets the following requirement: PMC 20.26.200 (4) (b) (iii) Angled facets, at least two per required building wall interval, including bay windows, covered entrances, and other similar features projecting out from the front facade at least three feet. There does appear to be the 2ft wall intervals however, I do not see any bay windows projecting 3ft out from those intervals?
Correction 8:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
3 elements from PMC 20.26.200(5) (b) are required. 2 of the items are clearly met by the proposal, however please select from either (i) Awnings or canopies above or window boxes below every window of an entire story or building interval grouping to distinguish one section of a building from another, OR (ii) Variation in the number of stories between intervals of the building and demonstrate how your proposal meets this requirement in order to satisfy the requirement for a total of 3 elements in this section.
Correction 9:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
(b) Multiple buildings on a single site shall not be exact or close replicas of each other. While common materials, colors and styles are acceptable, each building shall be unique in terms of its general massing design and fenestration design. Variety in designs shall be achieved by variation in each building’s footprint, rooines, facade modulation, and window arrangement. Color and materials shall also be varied. The proposed buildings are all identical, just mirrored, they are therefore 'close replicas' of each other. Please revise.
Update from 5/11/2024 re-submittal: building D and building A continue to be essentially identical (with the exception of minor articulation changes between the design of the center parts of the building. Furthermore, all the buildings have identical massing designs. Please revise per previous comment by significantly increasing the variation in the overall shape of each building.
Correction 10:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
Carports shall not exceed 72 ft in length, please revise.
Correction 11:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
Parking stalls shall not be located nor positioned to cause headlights to shine into windows of residential units. Alternatively, provide landscape plan that shows that all parking stalls that directly abut windows will be screened from windows with landscaping.
Update per 5/14/2024 re-submittal: requirement moved to a condition of approval.
Reviewer Comments:
Building Review
No Comments
06/27/2024
06/05/2024
Reviewer:
Corrections:
Correction 1:
BLTR - Codes
Comments:
The code reference on plans are 2018 I-codes. Upon submitting for building permits update all plans to meet 2021 I-codes. As of July 1, 2023, the State will adopt 2021 I-codes with Washington State Amendments which has significant changes.
Correction 2:
BLTR - Demolition
Comments:
A separate demolition permit will be required for the demo of the structures currently on the site and will require documentation from the Puget Sound Clean Air agency at the time of submittal for the demo permit.
Correction 3:
BLTR - Floodplain
Comments:
This property contains floodplain or wetland areas that may require flood venting as part of the foundation plan and Elevation Certificate submitted to City Engineer.
Will need show complete details for the required flood vents. Inclusion of and proper placement of the flood vents in the foundation (if applicable depending on building foundation type) are part of the building review. Provide calculations and size provided with manufacture’s specifications on vents.
Correction 4:
BLTR - EV - R-2
Comments:
Provide Electrical Vehicle Car Charging parking stalls on the parking plan. Review WAC 51-50-0429 and Section 429 of the IBC for Electric vehicle charging infrastructure. Effective July 1, 2023, Group I occupancies will require 10% EV charging stations. See Table 429.2 in IBC Section 429 (Washington State Amendments) to meet all requirements.
***Include in the parking calculations handicap stalls and Electric Vehicle Charging stations. Reflect locations on parking lot plan locations of required EV parking stalls and number to be handicap accessible.
Correction 5:
BLTR - Add Submittal Item: Geotech - Soil
Comments:
Additional Submittal Item: Provide a Geo-Tech report for soils with the building permit applications.
Correction 6:
BLTR - Codes
Comments:
Informational Only:
1. Plans need to be complete with all building, plumbing, mechanical, energy code
and accessibility requirements items on plans.
3. Need to submit all truss specs with building permit application.
4. Need to show the type A and B units and all specific details on the plans.
5. Clearly define all fire rated assemblies on the plans in detail.
6. All electrical is through the department of L & I electrical division.
7. Need to define all required accessible parking spaces. Accessible parking and access to the public way will be required. For all accessible requirements the City adopted the 2018 IBC / WAC 51-50 and the ICC A117.1-2009 standard.
Reviewer Comments:
Fire Review
No Comments
06/27/2024
06/03/2024
Reviewer:
Corrections:
Correction 1:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
• Verify available fire flow for accordance with IFC Appendix B and loop water main in accordance with Puyallup Municipal Code 16.08.
• The entrances shall meet ladder truck fire apparatus truck turning radiuses and approval of the angle of inclination.
• Provide F.D.C, and P.I.V locations to determine code compliance.
• Provide Fire Hydrant locations, Fire Hydrants are required to reach the building within 400’.
• A Fire Hydrant will be required to reach all points of the SFR’s within 600’.
• Fire Hydrants shall be at least 50’ from the structure and the FDC supporting the fire sprinkler system shall be no closer than 10’ and no greater than 15’ from the hydrant.
• P.I.V., F.D.C, and Fire Hydrants can not be blocked by parking stalls. All shall be placed in parking islands.
• Fire access road shall be no greater than 150’ from the furthest point of the structure per PMC 16.04.025 (4) 503.1.1.
• Auto-turn or equivalent program required to demonstrate code compliance.
• Maximum road grade shell be 10%
• Driveways or Tracts greater than 150’ will require a Fire Truck turn-around.
• Comply with Appendix “D” for fire access turnaround
• The East to West Road on the North side of the project going to the SFR will require the turnaround.
• Compact stalls will not be allowed along fire lane due to the possibility of larger vehicles overhanging into fire lane.
• Central Pierce Fire & Rescue is asking for a different road layout. What is the status?
• All vaults in the Fire Lane will be required to be fire apparatus rated for 75,000lbs.
Reviewer Comments:
Planning Review
Revisions Required
04/20/2023
05/11/2023
Reviewer:
Corrections:
Correction 1:
Add Submittal Item: Lot Combo
Comments:
Additional Submittal Item Required: Lot Combination Permit Application required. Application form can be downloaded from the City website at https://www.cityofpuyallup.org/DocumentCenter/View/11646/Lot-Combination-Application. Combination of all lots that include buildings that cross property lines is required.
Correction 2:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
Show property lines on all site plans.
Correction 3:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
Max allowed square footage for FAR for project is 292,113 sf, please correct on site plan.
Correction 4:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
Correction 5:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Could a patio be added for each ground floor resident? [Sheet A-2.2]
Correction 6:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Where is the street side entrance with a connection to the sidewalk on 25th St SE? [Sheet A 2.2]
Correction 7:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
It is unclear exactly how the proposed design meets the following requirement: PMC 20.26.200 (4) (b) (iii) Angled facets, at least two per required building wall interval, including bay windows, covered entrances, and other similar features projecting out from the front facade at least three feet. There does appear to be the 2ft wall intervals however, I do not see any bay windows projecting 3ft out from those intervals?
Correction 8:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
3 elements from PMC 20.26.200(5) (b) are required. 2 of the items are clearly met by the proposal, however please select from either (i) Awnings or canopies above or window boxes below every window of an entire story or building interval grouping to distinguish one section of a building from another, OR (ii) Variation in the number of stories between intervals of the building and demonstrate how your proposal meets this requirement in order to satisfy the requirement for a total of 3 elements in this section.
Correction 9:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
(b) Multiple buildings on a single site shall not be exact or close replicas of each other. While common materials, colors and styles are acceptable, each building shall be unique in terms of its general massing design and fenestration design. Variety in designs shall be achieved by variation in each building’s footprint, rooines, facade modulation, and window arrangement. Color and materials shall also be varied. The proposed buildings are all identical, just mirrored, they are therefore 'close replicas' of each other. Please revise.
Correction 10:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
Carports shall not exceed 72 ft in length, please revise.
Correction 11:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
Parking stalls shall not be located nor positioned to cause headlights to shine into windows of residential units. Alternatively, provide landscape plan that shows that all parking stalls that directly abut windows will be screened from windows with landscaping.
Reviewer Comments:
External Agency Review
Revisions Required
04/20/2023
05/01/2023
Reviewer:
Corrections:
Correction 1:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
Per comment from the Puyallup Tribe: The project is located in an area with known cultural resources and traditional use areas. This project has a high probability for encountering cultural resources important to the Puyallup Tribe. The Puyallup tribe is requesting an Archaeological survey be completed prior to this project beginning. The City of Puyallup will be honoring this request and a SEPA Mitigation measure outlining the requirements for the Archeological Survey will be included in the forthcoming SEPA Determination.
Correction 2:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
Revisions to the Habitat Assessment and wetland report are required. Figure 7 of the wetland report is corrupted and cannot be viewed correctly. See the two review letters from City's 3rd party review biologists dated March 31, 2023 for list of required changes.
Reviewer Comments:
Engineering Review
Revisions Required
04/20/2023
04/25/2023
Reviewer:
Corrections:
Correction 1:
See Document Markup
Comments:
See CUP application required site plan information. [site plan]
Correction 2:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide survey bearings. [site plan]
Correction 3:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show water, sewer and stormwater mains witihin 21st and 25th St SE. [site plan]
Correction 4:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide a legend for the site plan. [site plan]
Correction 5:
See Document Markup
Comments:
The city has adopted the 2019 Ecology Manual. Revise the report reference. [drainage report, pg 1]
Correction 6:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide the right of way widths for 21st and 25th St SE. [site plan]
Correction 7:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show existing and proposed contours [site plan]
Correction 8:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show the regulated AE floodplain and base flood elevation. [site plan]
Correction 9:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide the cut and fill amounts proposed for the project. How is the project proposing to mitigate the 1:1 compensatory storage to floodplain impacts?
Correction 10:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide additional sheets showing preliminary grading, drainage and frontage/lighting plan.
Correction 11:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide preliminary floodplain information showing how the development will meet the equivalent elevation requirement for 1:1 fill to compensatory storage. See PMC 21.07.060. [Drainage Report]
Correction 12:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show the pedestrian access route from the public right of way to on-site structures. [site plan]
Correction 13:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Include the following flow charts within the preliminary drainage report: Figure III-1.1: Runoff Treatment BMP Selection Flow Chart and Figure I-3.5 Flow chart for determining wetland protection level requirements. [drainage report, pg 2].
Correction 14:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Is the geotech report still being modified? Why is this a draft? [drainage report, pg 46]
Correction 15:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show the proposed 40' wide wetland buffer. [site plan]
Correction 16:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
Correction 17:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Revise the reference to the 2005 WDOE manual to the currently adopted 2019 Ecology Manual. [Biological Assessment, pg 12]
Correction 18:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
The biological habitat assessment and preliminary storm report floodplain information conflicts. This area has been re-mapped by FEMA and is within the regulated AE floodplain with an established base flood elevation, revise accordingly.
Correction 19:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show proposed preliminary stormwater mitigation on a separate sheet. [site plan]
Correction 20:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per the critical area report, the wetland on the NE side of the development is deemed a category IV wetland with a habitat score greater than 5, provide additional information as to how the wetland will meet the following requirements of the DOE manual for Minimum Requirement 8: General Protection, Protection from Pollutants and Wetland Hydroperiod Protection (method 2) [drainage report, pg 4]
Correction 21:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per minimum requirement #7, the pre-developed site condition must be modeled as forested land cover unless reasonable, historic information is provided that indicates the site was prairie prior to settlement. Revise the calculation or provide additional information. [drainage report, pg 6]
Correction 22:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide a downstream analysis to ensure both onsite and off-site has capacity to convey at a minimum the 25 year storm flow event, assuming developed conditions for onsite tributary areas, and existing conditions for any offsite tributary areas. [drainage report, pg 3]
Correction 23:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide a basin map to supplement the flow control WWHM calculation. [drainage report, pg 8]
Correction 24:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Section 2.6.2 of the Volume 1 of the SMMWW requires: An initial qualitative analysis shall extend downstream for the entire flow path from the project site to the receiving water or up to one mile, whichever is less. If a receiving water is within one-quarter mile, the analysis shall extend within the receiving water to one-quarter mile from the project site. The analysis shall extend one-quarter mile beyond any improvements proposed as mitigation. The analysis must extend upstream to a point where any backwater effects created by the project cease. Upon review of the qualitative analysis, the local project reviewer may require that a quantitative analysis be performed. [drainage report, pg 3]
Correction 25:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show existing easements. There is a stream easement relocation agreement here. [site plan]
Correction 26:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide a preliminary frontage plan showing proposed improvements. The traffic pre-app notes indicated the following improvements: 25th St SE: 30' wide commercial access onto 25th St SE, 2 city standard streetlights, and replacing the existing curb cuts with curb, gutter and planting strips. 21st St SE: Provide a 30' commercial access approach and street light. [site plan]
Correction 27:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show on-site routing of water, sewer and storm utilities. [site plan, pg 1]
Reviewer Comments:
Engineering Traffic Review
Revisions Required
04/20/2023
04/20/2023
Reviewer:
Corrections:
Correction 1:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
Per Puyallup Municipal Code Section 11.08.135, the applicant/owner would be expected to construct half-street improvements including curb, gutter, planter strip, sidewalk, roadway base, pavement, and street lighting. The extent of paving would be determined based on current condition. Any existing improvements which are damaged now or during construction, or which do not meet current City Standards, shall be replaced.
Correction 2:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
(2) City Standard Street Lights will be required along 25th ST SE Frontage
Correction 3:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
New Streetlight required at 21st ST SE / 7th AVE SE intersection
Correction 4:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
30ft wide commercial access required on 21st ST SE
Correction 5:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Remove obsolete curb cuts and show planned curb/gutter/sidewalk panels and planter strips
Site Plan pg A-0.1
Correction 6:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per City Standard 101.10.1 - Minimum driveway spacing standard not met
Site Plan pg A-0.1
Correction 7:
See Document Markup
Comments:
30ft wide commercial access required
Site Plan pg A-0.1
Correction 8:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
Correction 9:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide an Autoturn Analysis
Traffic Scoping
Correction 10:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
Submit sight distance analysis of the proposed driveways. Please provide photo documentation within the report of the sight distance analysis. The photo must show the location of the sight distance standard in the picture as well as the location of the viewer. If photo cannot be provided, plan sheets with plan and profile within the report can also provide the sight distance documentation. If this method is used, place the distance requirements as met on those documents and provide this information within the appendix of the report.
Correction 11:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
Civil submittal shall include detailed striping/signage plan.
Correction 12:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show preliminary location of city standard street lighting
Site Plan pg A-0.1
Correction 13:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Align driveway centerline with 7th AVE SE
Site Plan pg A-0.1
Correction 14:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coordinate with garbage service provider to assess proposed pickup locations
Site Plan pg A-0.1
Correction 15:
See Document Markup
Comments:
This garbage enclosure could cause sight distance obstructions for out bound vehicles
Relocate
Site Plan pg A-0.1
Correction 16:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
Park Impact Fee (Per residential dwelling Unit):
Less than 500 sqft $1,560.05
500 - 999 sqft $2,313.53
1,000 – 1,999 sqft $3,291.31
2,000 sqft or more $4,017.30
Reviewer Comments:
Building Review
Revisions Required
04/20/2023
04/19/2023
Reviewer:
Corrections:
Correction 1:
BLTR - Codes
Comments:
The code reference on plans are 2018 I-codes. Upon submitting for building permits update all plans to meet 2021 I-codes. As of July 1, 2023, the State will adopt 2021 I-codes with Washington State Amendments which has significant changes.
Correction 2:
BLTR - Demolition
Comments:
A separate demolition permit will be required for the demo of the structures currently on the site and will require documentation from the Puget Sound Clean Air agency at the time of submittal for the demo permit.
Correction 3:
BLTR - Floodplain
Comments:
This property contains floodplain or wetland areas that may require flood venting as part of the foundation plan and Elevation Certificate submitted to City Engineer.
Will need show complete details for the required flood vents. Inclusion of and proper placement of the flood vents in the foundation (if applicable depending on building foundation type) are part of the building review. Provide calculations and size provided with manufacture’s specifications on vents.
Correction 4:
BLTR - EV - R-2
Comments:
Provide Electrical Vehicle Car Charging parking stalls on the parking plan. Review WAC 51-50-0429 and Section 429 of the IBC for Electric vehicle charging infrastructure. Effective July 1, 2023, Group I occupancies will require 10% EV charging stations. See Table 429.2 in IBC Section 429 (Washington State Amendments) to meet all requirements.
***Include in the parking calculations handicap stalls and Electric Vehicle Charging stations. Reflect locations on parking lot plan locations of required EV parking stalls and number to be handicap accessible.
Correction 5:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
Correction 6:
BLTR - Add Submittal Item: Geotech - Soil
Comments:
Additional Submittal Item: Provide a Geo-Tech report for soils with the building permit applications.
Correction 7:
BLTR - Codes
Comments:
Informational Only:
1. Plans need to be complete with all building, plumbing, mechanical, energy code
and accessibility requirements items on plans.
3. Need to submit all truss specs with building permit application.
4. Need to show the type A and B units and all specific details on the plans.
5. Clearly define all fire rated assemblies on the plans in detail.
6. All electrical is through the department of L & I electrical division.
7. Need to define all required accessible parking spaces. Accessible parking and access to the public way will be required. For all accessible requirements the City adopted the 2018 IBC / WAC 51-50 and the ICC A117.1-2009 standard.
Reviewer Comments:
Fire Review
Revisions Required
04/20/2023
04/18/2023
Reviewer:
Corrections:
Correction 1:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
• Verify available fire flow for accordance with IFC Appendix B and loop water main in accordance with Puyallup Municipal Code 16.08.
• The entrances shall meet ladder truck fire apparatus truck turning radiuses and approval of the angle of inclination.
• Provide F.D.C, and P.I.V locations to determine code compliance.
• Provide Fire Hydrant locations, Fire Hydrants are required to reach the building within 400’.
• A Fire Hydrant will be required to reach all points of the SFR’s within 600’.
• Fire Hydrants shall be at least 50’ from the structure and the FDC supporting the fire sprinkler system shall be no closer than 10’ and no greater than 15’ from the hydrant.
• P.I.V., F.D.C, and Fire Hydrants can not be blocked by parking stalls. All shall be placed in parking islands.
• Fire access road shall be no greater than 150’ from the furthest point of the structure per PMC 16.04.025 (4) 503.1.1.
• Auto-turn or equivalent program required to demonstrate code compliance.
• Maximum road grade shell be 10%
• Driveways or Tracts greater than 150’ will require a Fire Truck turn-around.
• Comply with Appendix “D” for fire access turnaround
• The East to West Road on the North side of the project going to the SFR will require the turnaround.
• Compact stalls will not be allowed along fire lane due to the possibility of larger vehicles overhanging into fire lane.
• Central Pierce Fire & Rescue is asking for a different road layout. What is the status?
• All vaults in the Fire Lane will be required to be fire apparatus rated for 75,000lbs.
Reviewer Comments: