CITY OF PUYALLUP PERMITTING PORTAL

See Document Markup

The existing driveway approach in this location will need to be removed as part of the development. (site plan, pg 2]

See Document Markup

Since I've been here with the city, no project has been able to use continuous simulation modeling to pump from the outlet of a stormwater control structure to the downstream drainage system and meet the flow control standard. The WWHM modeling will need to show the developed discharge matches the pre-developed conditions for the actual flows, not an average. To pass, the pump must be the mechanism modeled in WWHM. Revise accordingly. [site plan, pg 19]

See Document Markup

Provide further clarification and calculations for how the pump will work connected to this water quality facility. Provide analysis showing the flow rate exiting this facility compared to the inflow from the pump. [Civil Plans, pg 1]

See Document Markup

A 10-foot buffer is required between vaults and property line per section 212.2.1(b) of City stormwater design standards. [Civil Plans, pg 1]

See Document Markup

Elaborate on how the receiving water quality and secondary vault control structure system can intake the volume of water being sent by the pump system. Ultimately, this will need to be in your modeling. See comments made in the storm report. [Civil Plans, pg 2]

See Document Markup

Provide further detailing for the proposed control structure. There is no sheet C1.1 provided in the submittal. [Civil Plans, pg 2]

See Document Markup

Update per comments made to civil plans. [Stormwater Plans, pg 1]

See Document Markup

Dimensions provided here differ from civil plans. Ensure that these plans match the civil plans if submitting separately. [Stormwater Plans, pg 2]

See Document Markup

Note to the designer - per the civil plans, this catch basin and associated storm main are being removed and relocated into the new curbline. [Site Plan, pg 3]

See Document Markup

Provide further detailing on what causes the flow chart to go this direction. [Storm Report, pg 11]

See Document Markup

Provide justification for the sizing of the second vault/control structure. Provide calculations showing that the sizing of the structure accommodates the flow entering from both the gravity system and the pump. [Storm Report, pg 18]

See Document Markup

It is unclear what is intended by this paragraph. The modeling provided needs to match the site plan. [Storm Report, pg 18]

See Document Markup

Ensure that the modeling is accurate to what is being shown on the plans. The pump system, water quality system, and secondary vault control structure are not being modeled. [Storm Report, pg 25]

See Document Markup

This orifice is not shown on the plans. Coordinate so that modeling and plans are consistent with each other. [Storm Report, pg 26]

See Document Markup

The provided wetlands report does not identify the wetland category. Please provide that in the resubmittal. Wetland category will impact the level of mitigation required. [Storm Report, pg 93]

See Document Markup

At the time of civil permit, if infiltration is to be used via a permeable sidewalk, the geotech will need to support the use of infiltration in this area, as well as provide the seasonal groundwater table, and provide a firm infiltration rate. [Geotechnical Report, pg 1]

See Document Markup

Update chamber depth and associated calcuations for consistency.

See Document Markup

This report is discussing how the constructed orifice and sizing provides equivalence to the modeled orifice/part of the notch flow for the 2-year flow frequency. Although the modeled system and actual system have an equivalent 2-year flow, this does not necessarily provide equivalence for all flow control situations (i.e. the durational flow). Additional information and calculations are required to show that the constructed notch and orifice with the pump design will meet the durational flow standard. This report will also need to account for how the head varies with time in both of the actual vaults, and how this is equivalent to the modeled scenario.

See Document Markup

If the modeled notch/orifice is equivalent to the actual notch/orifice being pumped to, why does the notch need to change? Either provide a design where the notch is the same between the modeled and actual design, or provide further rational for why this needs to be in the design, and how it still provides equivalence.

Other/Miscellaneous

Traffic Scoping Worksheet approved. Comprehensive traffic analysis must be reviewed/approved prior to PSP approval. • Please coordinate with the City of Puyallup Traffic Engineer to discuss scope of traffic analysis. • For traffic counts, existing queue lengths shall be collected to ensure model calibration and to quantify unserved demand. Provide a detailed summary for how model/volumes were adjusted to evaluate actual intersection delay. • For the 15th Ave SE/S Meridian intersection, include an AM/PM peak operational analysis. On sheet A1.6 of preliminary site plan, update turning diagrams using provided AutoTurn analysis. It appears circulation is very constricted and requires cars to encroach into opposing vehicle paths to navigate the parking garage. The provided vehicle information on sheet A1.6 does not match AASHTO Passenger Car dimensions. On sheet A1.6, please provide citation where parking garage design guidelines were obtained. Per previous comments, frontage improvements on 17th Ave SE will require 4ft wide x 10ft long tree cutouts (with Silva cells) with a 8ft wide clear walking path (12ft wide frontage overall). Most recent submittal showing 4ft x 4ft cutouts. Per previous comments, Engineering will require an AMR (Alternative Methods Request) for the proposed frontage on S Meridian (maintain 8ft wide sidewalks). Please submit prior to next resubmittal. Site access driveways shall meet our minimum commercial driveway requirements (30ft width).

See Document Markup

Provide right of way widths for both 17th Ave SE and South Meridian. [site plan, pg 3]

See Document Markup

Provide an oil-water separator for the underground parking. The OWS will need to be connected to sanitary sewer. [site plan, pg 4]

See Document Markup

The soil and groundwater conditions on page 2 of the geotech report is missing a majority of the letters and illegible. Revise for the resubmittal. [geotech report, pg 2]

See Document Markup

The post-developed conditions for the map on page 17 state the pervious area is 0.262 acres. Revise accordingly. [drainage report, pg 17]

See Document Markup

Include a bypass basin for the frontage improvements along 17th Ave SE. [drainage report, pg 17]

See Document Markup

Revise the impervious areas to match the post-developed conditions per the map/table on page 16 of the stormwater report. [drainage report, pg 18]

See Document Markup

Include the parcel number: 7790000140. [site plan, pg 2]

See Document Markup

Provide additional WWHM modeling showing the wetland hydroperiod remaining unaltered per the DOE's criteria. [drainage report, pg 17]

See Document Markup

The existing driveway approach in this location will need to be removed as part of the development. (site plan, pg 2]

Other/Miscellaneous

Revised plans not received as part of resubmittal package. Resubmit updated plans for Engineering Review. [Anthony Hulse @ 04/10/2024 12:31 PM]

See Document Markup

Callout the sewer main. [site plan, pg 3]

See Document Markup

The water main within S Meridian is located west of the existing sewer per city records. The water main in 17th ave SE [site plan]

See Document Markup

Floating gate valve. [site plan, pg 3]

See Document Markup

General notes missing? [site plan, pg 3]

See Document Markup

The sidewalk/ADA ramp shall be entirely located within the public right of way. Right of way dedication will be required at time of civils. [site plan, pg 3]

See Document Markup

Provide a note to remove the existing driveway approach in this location. [site plan, pg 3]

See Document Markup

Show location of stormwater main within S Meridian and 17th Ave SE. [civils, pg 3]

See Document Markup

What are these? [civils, pg 3]

See Document Markup

The proposed contour lines are missing [site plan, pg 3]

See Document Markup

Public and private stormwater runoff is not allowed to be comingled. Provide a bypass basin WWHM calculation. Remove the storm connection from 17th Ave SE to the detention vault. [civils, pg 1]

See Document Markup

Spot elevations not shown on sheet A1.0 as the comment response letter states. Prove that the driveway slope is limited to 10% max. [civils, pg 3]

See Document Markup

If a grease interceptor is required, it will need to be installed outside the building. Typically, a type 1 fume hood is the trigger for requiring a grease interceptor along with the 100mg/l of FOG. The project can voluntarily install a grease trap. [site plan, pg 4]

See Document Markup

What is this? There is a city storm main and catch basin located in this general area. [site plan, pg 4]

See Document Markup

Since I've been here with the city, no project has been able to use continuous simulation modeling to pump from the outlet of a stormwater control structure to the downstream drainage system and meet the flow control standard. The WWHM modeling will need to show the developed discharge matches the pre-developed conditions for the actual flows, not an average. To pass, the pump must be the mechanism modeled in WWHM. Revise accordingly. [site plan, pg 19]

See Document Markup

Remove floating note regarding 6" of sediment storage. [storm site plan, pg 1]

See Document Markup

The site plan provided from the architect show the underground detention vault located along the north side of the site, whereas the stormwater site plan from the Engineer shows the vault along the south side of the site. [site plan, pg 4]

See Document Markup

This ramp exceeds 10%, revise to meet Fire's requirements. [site plan, pg 6]

See Document Markup

Provide easement AFN from the city allowing the storm main to be placed on private property. Otherwise provide a draft easement for this utility. [site plan, pg 2]

See Document Markup

Relocate the existing storm main to under the proposed curb per current city standards. [civils, pg 1]

See Document Markup

Make a note to remove the existing driveway cut along South Meridian. [civils, pg 1]

See Document Markup

Provide 12' walk with 4' street tree cutouts along 17th Ave SE. [civils, pg 1]

See Document Markup

Provide a wetland report for the off-site wetland. Be sure to include the wetland category and habitat score. [civils, pg 1]

See Document Markup

Provide further clarification and calculations for how the pump will work connected to this water quality facility. Provide analysis showing the flow rate exiting this facility compared to the inflow from the pump. [Civil Plans, pg 1]

See Document Markup

A 10-foot buffer is required between vaults and property line per section 212.2.1(b) of City stormwater design standards. [Civil Plans, pg 1]

See Document Markup

Elaborate on how the receiving water quality and secondary vault control structure system can intake the volume of water being sent by the pump system. Ultimately, this will need to be in your modeling. See comments made in the storm report. [Civil Plans, pg 2]

See Document Markup

Provide further detailing for the proposed control structure. There is no sheet C1.1 provided in the submittal. [Civil Plans, pg 2]

See Document Markup

Update per comments made to civil plans. [Stormwater Plans, pg 1]

See Document Markup

Dimensions provided here differ from civil plans. Ensure that these plans match the civil plans if submitting separately. [Stormwater Plans, pg 2]

See Document Markup

Note to the designer - per the civil plans, this catch basin and associated storm main are being removed and relocated into the new curbline. [Site Plan, pg 3]

See Document Markup

Provide further detailing on what causes the flow chart to go this direction. [Storm Report, pg 11]

See Document Markup

Provide justification for the sizing of the second vault/control structure. Provide calculations showing that the sizing of the structure accommodates the flow entering from both the gravity system and the pump. [Storm Report, pg 18]

See Document Markup

It is unclear what is intended by this paragraph. The modeling provided needs to match the site plan. [Storm Report, pg 18]

See Document Markup

Ensure that the modeling is accurate to what is being shown on the plans. The pump system, water quality system, and secondary vault control structure are not being modeled. [Storm Report, pg 25]

See Document Markup

This orifice is not shown on the plans. Coordinate so that modeling and plans are consistent with each other. [Storm Report, pg 26]

See Document Markup

The provided wetlands report does not identify the wetland category. Please provide that in the resubmittal. Wetland category will impact the level of mitigation required. [Storm Report, pg 93]

See Document Markup

At the time of civil permit, if infiltration is to be used via a permeable sidewalk, the geotech will need to support the use of infiltration in this area, as well as provide the seasonal groundwater table, and provide a firm infiltration rate. [Geotechnical Report, pg 1]

Other/Miscellaneous

Traffic Scoping Worksheet approved. Comprehensive traffic analysis must be reviewed/approved prior to PSP approval. • Please coordinate with the City of Puyallup Traffic Engineer to discuss scope of traffic analysis. • For traffic counts, existing queue lengths shall be collected to ensure model calibration and to quantify unserved demand. Provide a detailed summary for how model/volumes were adjusted to evaluate actual intersection delay. • For the 15th Ave SE/S Meridian intersection, include an AM/PM peak operational analysis. On sheet A1.6 of preliminary site plan, update turning diagrams using provided AutoTurn analysis. It appears circulation is very constricted and requires cars to encroach into opposing vehicle paths to navigate the parking garage. The provided vehicle information on sheet A1.6 does not match AASHTO Passenger Car dimensions. On sheet A1.6, please provide citation where parking garage design guidelines were obtained. Per previous comments, frontage improvements on 17th Ave SE will require 4ft wide x 10ft long tree cutouts (with Silva cells) with a 8ft wide clear walking path (12ft wide frontage overall). Most recent submittal showing 4ft x 4ft cutouts. Per previous comments, Engineering will require an AMR (Alternative Methods Request) for the proposed frontage on S Meridian (maintain 8ft wide sidewalks). Please submit prior to next resubmittal. Site access driveways shall meet our minimum commercial driveway requirements (30ft width).

Other/Miscellaneous

Per the updated site plan, the proposed curb radius at the intersection of S Meridian/17th Ave SE must match existing (35ft) Per previous comments, frontage improvements on 17th Ave SE will require 4ft wide x 10ft long tree cutouts (with Silva cells) with a 8ft wide clear walking path (12ft wide frontage overall). This was not shown in most recent submittal. Please coordinate with Engineering/Planning on specific details. Engineering will require an AMR (Alternative Methods Request) for the proposed frontage on S Meridian (maintain 8ft wide sidewalks). Existing PSE mounted streetlight arm (NE corner of property) does not meet City standards and will be replace with a City standard 30ft pole. At the time of civil permit review provide a separate street lighting sheet for the city to review. City standard streetlights can likely connect with existing junction box on the SE corner of S Meridian/17th Ave SE. Proposed transformer & pad along 17th Ave SE frontage must be installed in-ground to avoid sight distance obstructions. Provide detailed dimensions for AASHTO passenger car used for AutoTurn analysis. Provide detailed design guidelines used for the parking garage circulation design. Based on the internal Autoturn analysis, circulation is very constricted and requires cars to encroach into opposing vehicle paths to navigate the parking garage.

Other/Miscellaneous

Parking: Update the draft parking agreement based on GFA consistent with scoping worksheet (currently not approved). City will use this document to place a condition within our permitting system that will prevent non-medical space to be converted to medical office use in the future.

Other/Miscellaneous

Per previous comments, entering sight distance analysis (per City standards) required prior to PSP approval. Based on preliminary site plan, there appear to be multiple sight obstructions along S Meridian frontage. Analysis (horz + vertical) must confirm design will not have any sight obstruction.

See Document Markup

Comment outstanding 07/30/24: Only one method has been applied (alternate building materials or wall textures). Code requires two methods be applied to break up the wall. This area includes the stairwell as well. The other method that may work best for this area is either more windows (which cover at least 25% of the wall surface) or a vertical trellis with climbing vines or plant material in front of the blank wall. Per PMC 20.26.300 (2) (a) Any wall or portion of a wall which is visible from a public street or residential zone and contains at least 400 square feet of surface area without any window, door, building wall modulation or other architectural feature shall screen or treat the wall using at least two of the methods or techniques found in PMC 20.26.300 (20(a)(i-iii) [elevations, A4.0]

Other/Miscellaneous

Aisle and driveway dimensions are not consistent on plan set. Some stalls, aisles, and ramps are meeting the required widths for 90degree parking though many are not. Please reference PMC 20.55.035 Aisle and driveway dimensions and update accordingly. Please address what design guidelines/criteria were used for site circulation within the garage as the circulation appears to be very tight.

See Document Markup

Provide the engineering firm name and contact information within the prelminary plan sheets. [site plan, pg 1]

See Document Markup

Provide the north arrow. [site plan, pg 3]

See Document Markup

Include Figure I-3.5: Flow Chart for determining wetland protection level requirements. Continuous modeling will be necessary to ensure the hydroperiod of the wetland remains unaltered. [drainage report, pg 9]

See Document Markup

Show water, sewer and stormwater mains within 17th Ave SE and South Meridian. [site plan, pg 3]

See Document Markup

Provide right of way widths for both 17th Ave SE and South Meridian. [site plan, pg 3]

See Document Markup

Trash enlcosures must meet city design standard 208.1. Revise accordingly. [site plan, pg 3]

See Document Markup

Provide additional spot elevations for the proposed driveway approach. The maximum allowed slope is 10%. [site plan, pg 3]

See Document Markup

Denote the entrances to the building. Hi-light the pedestrian access route(s) from the public right of way to the building. [site plan, pg 3]

See Document Markup

Provide a detail for the proposed detention system. [site plan, pg 4]

See Document Markup

Provide IE's for the proposed detention system and downstream connection. Will the project have to pump stormwater? [site plan, pg 4]

See Document Markup

Provide an oil-water separator for the underground parking. The OWS will need to be connected to sanitary sewer. [site plan, pg 4]

See Document Markup

The soil and groundwater conditions on page 2 of the geotech report is missing a majority of the letters and illegible. Revise for the resubmittal. [geotech report, pg 2]

See Document Markup

The post-developed conditions for the map on page 17 state the pervious area is 0.262 acres. Revise accordingly. [drainage report, pg 17]

See Document Markup

Include a bypass basin for the frontage improvements along 17th Ave SE. [drainage report, pg 17]

See Document Markup

Revise the impervious areas to match the post-developed conditions per the map/table on page 16 of the stormwater report. [drainage report, pg 18]

See Document Markup

Callout/add to the legend the existing street light on the existing and proposed plans. [site plan, pg 2]

See Document Markup

Callout the existing bus stop sign. [site plan, pg 2]

See Document Markup

Include the parcel number: 7790000140. [site plan, pg 2]

See Document Markup

Show the project connecting into the existing curb, gutter and sidewalk to the east. [site plan, pg 3]

See Document Markup

Provide additional WWHM modeling showing the wetland hydroperiod remaining unaltered per the DOE's criteria. [drainage report, pg 17]

See Document Markup

Provide horizontal and vertical datums for the survey. Vertical datums should be NAVD 88. [site plan, pg 2]

See Document Markup

Will this be a rollout trash can like a single family residence or a larger trash enlcosure? [site plan, pg 3]

See Document Markup

Provide the dimensions of the proposed detention vault. The WWHM calculation determined a 28'X74'X7' vault. [site plan, pg 4]

See Document Markup

Include the total square footage of the impervious area. [site plan, pg 3]

See Document Markup

Clearly denote the property line and add the linetype to the legend. [site plan, pg 2]

See Document Markup

Add DP-1 and DP-2 to to the legend. [site plan, pg 2]

See Document Markup

Show water mains within Meridian and 17th Ave SE. [site plan, pg 2]

See Document Markup

Provide a city standard streetlight along 17th Ave SE. It should be spaced a maximum 150' from the light at the intersection of Meridian and 17th Ave SE. [site plan, pg 3]

See Document Markup

What kind of food if any will be cooked within the Deli? Grease Interceptors are required for projects exceeding 100 mg/l of oil and grease discharge. [site plan, pg 4]

See Document Markup

Walls greater than 4' must apply for a building permit. [site plan, pg 4]

See Document Markup

The existing driveway approach in this location will need to be removed as part of the development. (site plan, pg 2]

See Document Markup

The existing topography survey is now missing from the plans. Include this in the next submission. [site plan, pg 2]

Other/Miscellaneous

Revised plans not received as part of resubmittal package. Resubmit updated plans for Engineering Review. [Anthony Hulse @ 04/10/2024 12:31 PM]

See Document Markup

Callout the sewer main. [site plan, pg 3]

See Document Markup

The water main within S Meridian is located west of the existing sewer per city records. The water main in 17th ave SE [site plan]

See Document Markup

Floating gate valve. [site plan, pg 3]

See Document Markup

General notes missing? [site plan, pg 3]

See Document Markup

The sidewalk/ADA ramp shall be entirely located within the public right of way. Right of way dedication will be required at time of civils. [site plan, pg 3]

See Document Markup

Provide a note to remove the existing driveway approach in this location. [site plan, pg 3]

See Document Markup

Show location of stormwater main within S Meridian and 17th Ave SE. [civils, pg 3]

See Document Markup

What are these? [civils, pg 3]

See Document Markup

The proposed contour lines are missing [site plan, pg 3]

See Document Markup

Public and private stormwater runoff is not allowed to be comingled. Provide a bypass basin WWHM calculation. Remove the storm connection from 17th Ave SE to the detention vault. [civils, pg 1]

See Document Markup

Spot elevations not shown on sheet A1.0 as the comment response letter states. Prove that the driveway slope is limited to 10% max. [civils, pg 3]

See Document Markup

If a grease interceptor is required, it will need to be installed outside the building. Typically, a type 1 fume hood is the trigger for requiring a grease interceptor along with the 100mg/l of FOG. The project can voluntarily install a grease trap. [site plan, pg 4]

See Document Markup

What is this? There is a city storm main and catch basin located in this general area. [site plan, pg 4]

See Document Markup

Since I've been here with the city, no project has been able to use continuous simulation modeling to pump from the outlet of a stormwater control structure to the downstream drainage system and meet the flow control standard. The WWHM modeling will need to show the developed discharge matches the pre-developed conditions for the actual flows, not an average. To pass, the pump must be the mechanism modeled in WWHM. Revise accordingly. [site plan, pg 19]

See Document Markup

Remove floating note regarding 6" of sediment storage. [storm site plan, pg 1]

See Document Markup

The site plan provided from the architect show the underground detention vault located along the north side of the site, whereas the stormwater site plan from the Engineer shows the vault along the south side of the site. [site plan, pg 4]

See Document Markup

This ramp exceeds 10%, revise to meet Fire's requirements. [site plan, pg 6]

See Document Markup

Provide easement AFN from the city allowing the storm main to be placed on private property. Otherwise provide a draft easement for this utility. [site plan, pg 2]

See Document Markup

Relocate the existing storm main to under the proposed curb per current city standards. [civils, pg 1]

See Document Markup

Make a note to remove the existing driveway cut along South Meridian. [civils, pg 1]

See Document Markup

Provide 12' walk with 4' street tree cutouts along 17th Ave SE. [civils, pg 1]

See Document Markup

Provide a wetland report for the off-site wetland. Be sure to include the wetland category and habitat score. [civils, pg 1]

Add Submittal Item: Tree Risk Assessment for Significant Trees

Comment outstanding 04/09/24: Please include the tree risk assessment report in addition to the submitted arborist tree plan. Additional Submittal Item Required: Existing trees on the site which are larger than 15” in Diameter at Breast Height (DBH) are considered to be ‘significant trees’ and must be retained, where possible. If your site includes any significant trees, then you must include a tree risk assessment completed by a certified arborist and provided with your land use application and civil construction permit landscape plan. Any significant trees healthy enough to be retained in planned or required landscape areas shall be retained and shown on the landscape plans. See Vegetation Management Standards Plan Page 19 for criteria for significant tree retention. This report is required regardless if they are going to be torn down to build out the site.

Final Landscape Plan - Tree and utility conflicts

Comment outstanding 04/09/24: Trees along western property line appear to be directly over the SD line. Please address. To avoid conflicts between underground and overhead utilities and trees as the grow and mature, please review the VMS tree installation standards table for required distances from various utilities and improvements.

See Document Markup

Comment outstanding 04/09/24: The landscaping needs to continue south. A pathway can lead from the sidewalk to the cafe through the landscaping, but the entire area cannot all be cafe space. Per PMC 20.30.037 (2)(c)(ii) an outdoor cafe may project into the required front or street side yard landscape buffer by a maximum of 6ft. A pathway from the sidewalk to the cafe through the landscape area would be allowed. [landscape plan, A1.0]

Max Building Height

Comment outstanding 04/09/24: Comment response letter provides an elevation for average base point to calculate building height, but does not provide the building height. Please provide the height of the building using the equation referenced below and also include it on the architectural elevations plan set as requested in the original comment. The maximum building height in this zone is 50ft. Please calculate the height of the structure and provide the calculation on the elevation plans. The City determines height as follows: The vertical distance from the lower of the finished average adjoining grade to the top of a flat roof, the crown of a mansard roof, or to the mean height between the eaves and ridge of a gable, hip, gambrel or similar pitched roof. The ridge of a gable, hip, gambrel or similar pitched roof shall not extend over eight feet above the specified maximum height limit. Church steeples, chimneys, elevator penthouses, vents and similar enclosures or equipment shall not be considered for the purpose of determining building or structure height, as long as such enclosures or equipment do not cover a significant portion of the roof area. “Adjoining grade” means the ground level at a given point adjacent to a structure. “Adjoining grade, average” means a single reference elevation which indicates the average grade or ground level of the perimeter of a structure, based on the sum of the existing or finished grade elevations, whichever is lower, which are adjacent to an exterior wall. Average adjoining grade (A.A.G.) is calculated by the following: A.A.G. = SUM(AE x WL)/SUM WL where AE is the average ground elevation between each two-foot contour line adjacent to the perimeter of the structure or part of structure for which the A.A.G. is being calculated; and where WL is the wall length between each two-foot contour line described above.

Other/Miscellaneous

Comment outstanding 04/09/24: Though the northern elevation has been addressed, the western elevation is still not meeting this code. The roofline exceeds 50ft in length on the western elevation as well so the height of the visible roofline must change at least 8ft. Please update on construction plan set and elevations. Per PMC 20.26.300 (1)(c) Roofline Modulation. If the continuous roofline exceeds 50 feet in length on a building with a flat, gabled, hipped or similar roof, or on a roofline with slopes of less than three feet vertical to 12 feet horizontal, the following methods shall be used: (i) The height of the visible roofline must change at least four feet if the adjacent roof segments are less than 50 feet in length. (ii) The height of the visible roofline must change at least eight feet if the adjacent roof segments are 50 feet or more in length. Please re-submit plans meeting this requirement.

See Document Markup

Comment outstanding 04/09/24: Comment response later states that the awning is called out on A1.0, but it is not. Please add. Per PMC 20.26.300 (3)(b)(i), the pedestrian-oriented plaza spaces in front of the building shall be covered by awnings covering at least 6ft of the plaza space for the entirety of the plaza length. Please resubmit plans with the awning spanning the entire length of the plaza area on both the north and west side. [elevations, A4.1]

See Document Markup

Comment outstanding 04/09/24: Height was not clearly indicated. Please clearly indicate the height as well as the proposed wall plane lengths. A wall plane is a flat vertical surface on a building facade, which may include doors, windows, openings, or other incidental recessions that do not extend through to the roofline. In addition to this, the proposed modulations are not meeting the allowed minimum depth of 10ft for modulations. If the maximum height of the building is exceeded, then the proposed wall planes may be exceeding what is allowed in PMC 20.26.300 (1) Building Wall and Roof Modulation. In a separate comment, I requested that the height calculation be shown on the plans. If the proposed elevations must change in order to meet maximum height, please also update elevations to reflect and meet PMC 20.26.300 (1) (a) and (b) PMC 20.26.300 (1) All buildings which contain two or more stories or have a building footprint of more than 10,000 square feet or which have any façade length greater than 100 feet, and which will be visible from a public street or residential zone for more than three years beyond the date of construction completion, shall use the following elements and features in design and construction of the building: (a) Wall Plane Proportions. No wall plane visible from any public right-of-way shall be wider than two and one-half times the height of the wall plane. (A wall plane is a flat vertical surface on a building façade, which may include doors, windows, openings, or other incidental recessions that do not extend through to the roofline.) (b) Horizontal Modulation. All building walls shall provide horizontal modulation consistent with the following standards: (i) The maximum allowable horizontal length of a building wall between modulations is 100 feet; (ii) The minimum depth of each modulation is 10 feet; and (iii) The minimum width of each modulation is 15 feet. [elevations, A4.1]

See Document Markup

Comment outstanding 07/30/24: Only one method has been applied (alternate building materials or wall textures). Code requires two methods be applied to break up the wall. This area includes the stairwell as well. The other method that may work best for this area is either more windows (which cover at least 25% of the wall surface) or a vertical trellis with climbing vines or plant material in front of the blank wall. Per PMC 20.26.300 (2) (a) Any wall or portion of a wall which is visible from a public street or residential zone and contains at least 400 square feet of surface area without any window, door, building wall modulation or other architectural feature shall screen or treat the wall using at least two of the methods or techniques found in PMC 20.26.300 (20(a)(i-iii) [elevations, A4.0]

Other/Miscellaneous

Floorplans [A2.0 & A2.1] 1are not consistent with project statistics on cover page [A0.0]. The Project statistics table shows that there is only medical office space on floors 4 and 6. However, the floor plans show medial office space on floors 4, 5, and 6. Please update plans to be consistent and accurate. This will effect your parking count as well.

Other/Miscellaneous

Generally, there are many comments in the comment response letter that say staff corrections have been addressed, but are not actually addressed in the resubmitted plan set. Please cross check the comment response letter with the uploaded documents for accuracy and consistency. Multiple review staff were unable to review the resubmittal properly due to the submittal items not being included, inconsistencies in the plans, etc.

Other/Miscellaneous

Clarify the type of landscaping being proposed on along the eastern side. We required Type IIIa, resubmitted plans show Type IIIb, and architectural plan set shows a wall. We will require that the landscaping be detailed in the final landscape plan with utility overlay with the submittal of the associated civil application. in the meantime, please clarify which landscape type you will be proposing, Type IIIa or Type IIIb.

Other/Miscellaneous

Aisle and driveway dimensions are not consistent on plan set. Some stalls, aisles, and ramps are meeting the required widths for 90degree parking though many are not. Please reference PMC 20.55.035 Aisle and driveway dimensions and update accordingly. Please address what design guidelines/criteria were used for site circulation within the garage as the circulation appears to be very tight.

Other/Miscellaneous

Traffic Scoping Comments: -Scoping assumptions NOT approved by the City. Once the traffic scoping worksheet is approved, a written response would be sent to the applicant’s traffic engineer outlining the scope of the project’s Traffic Impact Study (TIS). -sqft calculations not consistent with updated site plan. -Provide detailed calculation of GFA computation per ITE definition. GFA includes (but not limited to), circulation corridors, lobbies, bathrooms, storage, etc. -Per the latest site plan submittal, the GFA was 53,854sqft (parking excluded). Scoping worksheet only included 30,707sqft of GFA -Per previous comment, it is not reasonable to assume conference rooms/event space will not be utilized during normal operating hours of the facility. Proposed meeting rooms sqft must included in trip generation calculation. This type of partitioned meeting rooms are common within offices.

Other/Miscellaneous

Per the updated site plan, the proposed curb radius at the intersection of S Meridian/17th Ave SE must match existing (35ft) Per previous comments, frontage improvements on 17th Ave SE will require 4ft wide x 10ft long tree cutouts (with Silva cells) with a 8ft wide clear walking path (12ft wide frontage overall). This was not shown in most recent submittal. Please coordinate with Engineering/Planning on specific details. Engineering will require an AMR (Alternative Methods Request) for the proposed frontage on S Meridian (maintain 8ft wide sidewalks). Existing PSE mounted streetlight arm (NE corner of property) does not meet City standards and will be replace with a City standard 30ft pole. At the time of civil permit review provide a separate street lighting sheet for the city to review. City standard streetlights can likely connect with existing junction box on the SE corner of S Meridian/17th Ave SE. Proposed transformer & pad along 17th Ave SE frontage must be installed in-ground to avoid sight distance obstructions. Provide detailed dimensions for AASHTO passenger car used for AutoTurn analysis. Provide detailed design guidelines used for the parking garage circulation design. Based on the internal Autoturn analysis, circulation is very constricted and requires cars to encroach into opposing vehicle paths to navigate the parking garage.

Other/Miscellaneous

Parking: Update the draft parking agreement based on GFA consistent with scoping worksheet (currently not approved). City will use this document to place a condition within our permitting system that will prevent non-medical space to be converted to medical office use in the future.

Other/Miscellaneous

Per previous comments, entering sight distance analysis (per City standards) required prior to PSP approval. Based on preliminary site plan, there appear to be multiple sight obstructions along S Meridian frontage. Analysis (horz + vertical) must confirm design will not have any sight obstruction.

Other/Miscellaneous

SEPA Checklist 1. One public comment was received via e-mail by a neighboring property owner, Tim Rector at 1703 S Meridian. He expressed concern that there is not enough parking for the size of the building being proposed and that there are already issues with parking in the area. Mr. Rector has suggested there be a covenant placed on the building that allows for only so much medical office space to match the current parking requirements or to reduce the size of the building. He is concerned that if the entire building is proposed to be medical use, then people would start to park in his parking lot at 1703 S Meridian. Please review his full comment response under Documents & Images and provide a response in your re-submittal.

Add Submittal Item: Tree Risk Assessment for Significant Trees

Comment outstanding 04/09/24: Please include the tree risk assessment report in addition to the submitted arborist tree plan. Additional Submittal Item Required: Existing trees on the site which are larger than 15” in Diameter at Breast Height (DBH) are considered to be ‘significant trees’ and must be retained, where possible. If your site includes any significant trees, then you must include a tree risk assessment completed by a certified arborist and provided with your land use application and civil construction permit landscape plan. Any significant trees healthy enough to be retained in planned or required landscape areas shall be retained and shown on the landscape plans. See Vegetation Management Standards Plan Page 19 for criteria for significant tree retention. This report is required regardless if they are going to be torn down to build out the site.

See Document Markup

Per PMC 20.30.045 (1) - Exterior Mechanical Devices: Large mechanical equipment shall be screened from surrounding residentially zoned properties and public rights-of-way. Minor utility equipment, such as small generators, utility meters, air conditioners, or junction boxes, which are less than three and one-half feet in height, shall be exempt from screening requirements. Alternative methods for screening may include the use of building or parapet walls, sight-obscuring fencing and/or landscaping, equipment enclosures, consolidation and orientation of devices towards the center of the rooftop, and/or the use of neutral color surfaces. [site plan, A1.0]

Other/Miscellaneous

Per PMC 20.30.045 (12) Pedestrian Access and Circulation. Pedestrian walkways shall be constructed to provide safe, convenient and direct access between building entrances, transit facilities, passenger loading areas, public sidewalks, adjacent properties and pedestrian plazas. All parking lots which contain more than 90,000 square feet of paved area including driveways and traffic aisles shall include clearly defined pedestrian routes from parking stalls to main building entrances. All required walkways shall meet the following minimum requirements: (a) All walkways shall be a minimum of five feet wide with no encroachments (vehicle overhangs, displays, etc.) permitted; (b) All walkways shall be handicapped accessible and comply with the Washington State Barrier Free Design Standards; (c) All walkways shall be delineated by painted markings, distinctive pavement, or by being raised a minimum of six inches above the parking lot pavement; (d) Walkways within parking lots shall be located along major access corridors (primary driveway entrances between primary building entrances, etc.); and (e) Walkways within parking lots shall be integrated into interior landscape areas, whenever possible, to separate pedestrian access and vehicular travel routes.

Final Landscape Plan - Landscape Types

The City's Vegetation Management Standards Manual (VMS) outlines specific treatment “types” that are required to be adhered to, dependent upon the yard area the landscaping is located within Landscaping will be reviewed further as part of the final landscape plan required to be submitted with the civil permit application. See the VMS, sections 13 and 14 for full details on what each landscape treatment type requires.. The VMS can be downloaded here: https://www.cityofpuyallup.org/puyallupvms Front (west): Type IIa Street side (north): Type IIa Interior side (south): Type IIIb Rear (east): Type IIIa

See Document Markup

Elevations and plans are not consistent. Please adjust both to portray what is being proposed. Will this area on the SE corner be walled off and include steel doors for the trash enclosure as shown on page 2 of the elevation plans or will it be open as shown here? [elevations, A5.0]

See Document Markup

The planning director does not approve the proposed 20% parking reduction for native landscaping in the courtyard. More parking will need to be provided or the square footage of proposed uses will need to decrease. [site plan, A0.0]

Final Landscape Plan - Tree and utility conflicts

Comment outstanding 04/09/24: Trees along western property line appear to be directly over the SD line. Please address. To avoid conflicts between underground and overhead utilities and trees as the grow and mature, please review the VMS tree installation standards table for required distances from various utilities and improvements.

See Document Markup

Only 131 stalls are required [site plan, A0.0]

See Document Markup

Per PMC 20.30.045 (7), trash and recycling receptacles shall be screened from adjacent properties and public right-of-ways by an opaque visual barrier no lower than the highest point of the receptacles. [site plan, A2.0]

See Document Markup

Include proposed retaining wall and details on landscape plans including height, setback, etc. See PMC 20.58.005 (2) for more information regarding standards for retaining walls for rear and side property lines. [landscape plan, L-1]

See Document Markup

Comment outstanding 04/09/24: The landscaping needs to continue south. A pathway can lead from the sidewalk to the cafe through the landscaping, but the entire area cannot all be cafe space. Per PMC 20.30.037 (2)(c)(ii) an outdoor cafe may project into the required front or street side yard landscape buffer by a maximum of 6ft. A pathway from the sidewalk to the cafe through the landscape area would be allowed. [landscape plan, A1.0]

Max Building Height

Comment outstanding 04/09/24: Comment response letter provides an elevation for average base point to calculate building height, but does not provide the building height. Please provide the height of the building using the equation referenced below and also include it on the architectural elevations plan set as requested in the original comment. The maximum building height in this zone is 50ft. Please calculate the height of the structure and provide the calculation on the elevation plans. The City determines height as follows: The vertical distance from the lower of the finished average adjoining grade to the top of a flat roof, the crown of a mansard roof, or to the mean height between the eaves and ridge of a gable, hip, gambrel or similar pitched roof. The ridge of a gable, hip, gambrel or similar pitched roof shall not extend over eight feet above the specified maximum height limit. Church steeples, chimneys, elevator penthouses, vents and similar enclosures or equipment shall not be considered for the purpose of determining building or structure height, as long as such enclosures or equipment do not cover a significant portion of the roof area. “Adjoining grade” means the ground level at a given point adjacent to a structure. “Adjoining grade, average” means a single reference elevation which indicates the average grade or ground level of the perimeter of a structure, based on the sum of the existing or finished grade elevations, whichever is lower, which are adjacent to an exterior wall. Average adjoining grade (A.A.G.) is calculated by the following: A.A.G. = SUM(AE x WL)/SUM WL where AE is the average ground elevation between each two-foot contour line adjacent to the perimeter of the structure or part of structure for which the A.A.G. is being calculated; and where WL is the wall length between each two-foot contour line described above.

Other/Miscellaneous

Comment outstanding 04/09/24: Though the northern elevation has been addressed, the western elevation is still not meeting this code. The roofline exceeds 50ft in length on the western elevation as well so the height of the visible roofline must change at least 8ft. Please update on construction plan set and elevations. Per PMC 20.26.300 (1)(c) Roofline Modulation. If the continuous roofline exceeds 50 feet in length on a building with a flat, gabled, hipped or similar roof, or on a roofline with slopes of less than three feet vertical to 12 feet horizontal, the following methods shall be used: (i) The height of the visible roofline must change at least four feet if the adjacent roof segments are less than 50 feet in length. (ii) The height of the visible roofline must change at least eight feet if the adjacent roof segments are 50 feet or more in length. Please re-submit plans meeting this requirement.

See Document Markup

Comment outstanding 04/09/24: Comment response later states that the awning is called out on A1.0, but it is not. Please add. Per PMC 20.26.300 (3)(b)(i), the pedestrian-oriented plaza spaces in front of the building shall be covered by awnings covering at least 6ft of the plaza space for the entirety of the plaza length. Please resubmit plans with the awning spanning the entire length of the plaza area on both the north and west side. [elevations, A4.1]

See Document Markup

Comment outstanding 04/09/24: Height was not clearly indicated. Please clearly indicate the height as well as the proposed wall plane lengths. A wall plane is a flat vertical surface on a building facade, which may include doors, windows, openings, or other incidental recessions that do not extend through to the roofline. In addition to this, the proposed modulations are not meeting the allowed minimum depth of 10ft for modulations. If the maximum height of the building is exceeded, then the proposed wall planes may be exceeding what is allowed in PMC 20.26.300 (1) Building Wall and Roof Modulation. In a separate comment, I requested that the height calculation be shown on the plans. If the proposed elevations must change in order to meet maximum height, please also update elevations to reflect and meet PMC 20.26.300 (1) (a) and (b) PMC 20.26.300 (1) All buildings which contain two or more stories or have a building footprint of more than 10,000 square feet or which have any façade length greater than 100 feet, and which will be visible from a public street or residential zone for more than three years beyond the date of construction completion, shall use the following elements and features in design and construction of the building: (a) Wall Plane Proportions. No wall plane visible from any public right-of-way shall be wider than two and one-half times the height of the wall plane. (A wall plane is a flat vertical surface on a building façade, which may include doors, windows, openings, or other incidental recessions that do not extend through to the roofline.) (b) Horizontal Modulation. All building walls shall provide horizontal modulation consistent with the following standards: (i) The maximum allowable horizontal length of a building wall between modulations is 100 feet; (ii) The minimum depth of each modulation is 10 feet; and (iii) The minimum width of each modulation is 15 feet. [elevations, A4.1]

See Document Markup

Comment outstanding 04/09/24: Only one method has been applied (alternate building materials or wall textures). Code requires two methods be applied to break up the wall. This area includes the stairwell as well. The other method that may work best for this area is either more windows (which cover at least 25% of the wall surface) or a vertical trellis with climbing vines or plant material in front of the blank wall. Per PMC 20.26.300 (2) (a) Any wall or portion of a wall which is visible from a public street or residential zone and contains at least 400 square feet of surface area without any window, door, building wall modulation or other architectural feature shall screen or treat the wall using at least two of the methods or techniques found in PMC 20.26.300 (20(a)(i-iii) [elevations, A4.0]

See Document Markup

6ft wide perimeter landscape buffer is required. Please adjust all plans accordingly. [landscape plan, A1.0]

Other/Miscellaneous

Please see Documents & Images for the full comment letters from Agencies in response to the Notice of Application: - Department of Ecology (NOA Response - ECY Comments 08302023) - Nisqually Indian Tribe (NOA Response - Nisqually Indian Tribe 08242023) - Squaxin Island Tribe (NOA Response - Squaxin Island Tribe 08222023)

Other/Miscellaneous

Floorplans [A2.0 & A2.1] 1are not consistent with project statistics on cover page [A0.0]. The Project statistics table shows that there is only medical office space on floors 4 and 6. However, the floor plans show medial office space on floors 4, 5, and 6. Please update plans to be consistent and accurate. This will effect your parking count as well.

Other/Miscellaneous

Generally, there are many comments in the comment response letter that say staff corrections have been addressed, but are not actually addressed in the resubmitted plan set. Please cross check the comment response letter with the uploaded documents for accuracy and consistency. Multiple review staff were unable to review the resubmittal properly due to the submittal items not being included, inconsistencies in the plans, etc.

Other/Miscellaneous

Clarify the type of landscaping being proposed on along the eastern side. We required Type IIIa, resubmitted plans show Type IIIb, and architectural plan set shows a wall. We will require that the landscaping be detailed in the final landscape plan with utility overlay with the submittal of the associated civil application. in the meantime, please clarify which landscape type you will be proposing, Type IIIa or Type IIIb.

Other/Miscellaneous

Responses were not provided for the following comments: Traffic Scoping Comments: The scoping worksheet needs to use gross floor area for estimating trip generation per ITE. This site not located within the Good Samaritan Hospital campus and is not adjacent to campus property. Use the stand-alone rates for LUC 720. Per ITE, there are no pass-by trips for LUC 720. Please recalculate trip generation by removing pass-by rates for this land use. The scoping worksheet assumptions are not consistent with architect drawing package Day spa, event space, have not been accounted for. All land uses must be included in trip generation calculations. Need more information on possible end user of retail space. Application describes as “future tenant space for either retail or service-type business: There’s a lot of variability within this type of land uses. General Comments: Traffic scoping worksheet will be required for this project. The City policy requires the project trips to be estimated using the Institute of Transportation Engineers’ (ITE) Trip Generation, 11th Edition. In general, trip generation regression equations shall be used when the R2 value is 0.70 or greater. For single-family units and offices smaller than 30,000 SF, use ITE’s Trip Generation, average rate. The project trips shall be rounded to the nearest tenth. Trip credits would be allowed for any existing development. Once the traffic scoping worksheet is reviewed, a written response would be sent to the applicant’s traffic engineer outlining the scope of the project’s Traffic Impact Study (TIS). The city has adopted a City-Wide Traffic Impact Fee of $4,500 per PM peak hour trip. Final fees will be calculated and assessed by the City at the time of building permit issuance. Per Puyallup Municipal Code Section 11.08.135, the applicant/owner would be expected to construct half-street improvements including curb, gutter, planter strip, sidewalk, roadway base, pavement, and street lighting. Any existing improvements which are damaged now or during construction, or which do not meet current City Standards, shall be replaced. Based on the materials submitted, 17th Ave SE along the site shall consist of 34-foot street with curb and gutter, sidewalk, wheelchair ramps (where applicable), street trees and streetlights in a 60-foot right-of-way (ROW). The improvements shall be measured from street centerline. City standard streetlights can likely connect with existing junction box on the SE corner of S Meridian/17th Ave SE. Frontage improvements on 17th Ave SE will require 4ft wide x 10ft long tree cutouts (with Silva cells) with a 8ft wide clear walking path (12ft wide frontage overall). Please coordinate with Engineering/Planning on specific details. Engineering may require an AMR (Alternative Methods Request) for the proposed frontage on S Meridian (maintain 8ft wide sidewalks). Commercial driveway shall be minimum 30ft wide. Entering sight distance analysis required (per City standards). Based on preliminary site plan, there appear to be multiple sight obstructions along S Meridian frontage. Analysis (horz + vertical) must confirm design will not have any sight obstruction.

Other/Miscellaneous

Update site plan with required frontage improvements. Show 34ft wide roadway width along frontage. Show tie-in with existing curb/gutter on NE corner of frontage. Per COP code, dumpsters require enclosures with roof and must be comply with planning/building code setbacks. Relocate dumpster within on-site parking area. At the time of civil permit review provide a separate street lighting sheet for the city to review. Floor plans provided are not consistent with “Project Statistics” table located on page A0.0 Applicant/owner shall propose some type of agreement that will restrict the future use of building. Additional medical office sqft would not be allowed in the future if adequate on-site parking is not provided. On-site AutoTurn anaslyis required to ensure inbound/outbound vehicles can safely maneuver within proposed parking garage.

Other/Miscellaneous

Parking: Applicant/owner shall propose some type of agreement that will restrict the future use of building. Additional medical office sqft would not be allowed in the future if adequate on-site parking is not provided.

Other/Miscellaneous

1. Plans need to be complete with all building, plumbing, mechanical, energy code and accessibility requirements items on plans. 2. Provide Building Area calculations per section 506 to meet Table 506.2 with Washington State Amendments for total allowable square footage. 3. Need to submit all truss specs with building permit application if applicable. 4. Currently we are using all the 2018 codes and the many Washington State Amendments adopted February 1, 2021. Currently has been extended to March 14, 2024 for complete submittal. 5. Need to show the required infrastructure for the electric charging stations, INDICATED IN PARKING CACULATIONS ALL REQUIRED EV PARKING REQUIREMENTS. REFERENCE WAC 51-50-0429 FOR 2021 AS SIGNIFICANT CHANGES WILL BE WITHIN THE ADOPTION OF THE 2021 I-CODES ANTICIPATED MARCH 15, 2023. REFERENCE TABLE 429.2 FOR ALL EV REQUIREMENTS BY OCCUPANCY GROUP. SEE COMMENT PAGE A0.0 6. Clearly define all fire rated assemblies on the plans and provide UL details for construction and inspections. 7. All electrical is through the department of L & I electrical division. 8. Need to define all required accessible parking spaces and the accessible route to the public way on the site plans.

See Document Markup

Provide a sheet index for the plan set. [site plan, pg 1]

See Document Markup

Provide the engineering firm name and contact information within the prelminary plan sheets. [site plan, pg 1]

See Document Markup

Provide the north arrow. [site plan, pg 3]

See Document Markup

Include Figure I-3.5: Flow Chart for determining wetland protection level requirements. Continuous modeling will be necessary to ensure the hydroperiod of the wetland remains unaltered. [drainage report, pg 9]

See Document Markup

Show water, sewer and stormwater mains within 17th Ave SE and South Meridian. [site plan, pg 3]

See Document Markup

Provide right of way widths for both 17th Ave SE and South Meridian. [site plan, pg 3]

See Document Markup

Trash enlcosures must meet city design standard 208.1. Revise accordingly. [site plan, pg 3]

See Document Markup

Provide additional spot elevations for the proposed driveway approach. The maximum allowed slope is 10%. [site plan, pg 3]

See Document Markup

Denote the entrances to the building. Hi-light the pedestrian access route(s) from the public right of way to the building. [site plan, pg 3]

See Document Markup

Provide a detail for the proposed detention system. [site plan, pg 4]

See Document Markup

Provide IE's for the proposed detention system and downstream connection. Will the project have to pump stormwater? [site plan, pg 4]

See Document Markup

Provide an oil-water separator for the underground parking. The OWS will need to be connected to sanitary sewer. [site plan, pg 4]

See Document Markup

The soil and groundwater conditions on page 2 of the geotech report is missing a majority of the letters and illegible. Revise for the resubmittal. [geotech report, pg 2]

See Document Markup

The post-developed conditions for the map on page 17 state the pervious area is 0.262 acres. Revise accordingly. [drainage report, pg 17]

See Document Markup

Include a bypass basin for the frontage improvements along 17th Ave SE. [drainage report, pg 17]

See Document Markup

Revise the impervious areas to match the post-developed conditions per the map/table on page 16 of the stormwater report. [drainage report, pg 18]

See Document Markup

Callout/add to the legend the existing street light on the existing and proposed plans. [site plan, pg 2]

See Document Markup

Callout the existing bus stop sign. [site plan, pg 2]

See Document Markup

Include the parcel number: 7790000140. [site plan, pg 2]

See Document Markup

Show the project connecting into the existing curb, gutter and sidewalk to the east. [site plan, pg 3]

See Document Markup

Provide additional WWHM modeling showing the wetland hydroperiod remaining unaltered per the DOE's criteria. [drainage report, pg 17]

See Document Markup

Provide horizontal and vertical datums for the survey. Vertical datums should be NAVD 88. [site plan, pg 2]

See Document Markup

Will this be a rollout trash can like a single family residence or a larger trash enlcosure? [site plan, pg 3]

See Document Markup

Provide the dimensions of the proposed detention vault. The WWHM calculation determined a 28'X74'X7' vault. [site plan, pg 4]

See Document Markup

Include the total square footage of the impervious area. [site plan, pg 3]

See Document Markup

Clearly denote the property line and add the linetype to the legend. [site plan, pg 2]

See Document Markup

Add DP-1 and DP-2 to to the legend. [site plan, pg 2]

See Document Markup

Show water mains within Meridian and 17th Ave SE. [site plan, pg 2]

See Document Markup

Provide a city standard streetlight along 17th Ave SE. It should be spaced a maximum 150' from the light at the intersection of Meridian and 17th Ave SE. [site plan, pg 3]

See Document Markup

What kind of food if any will be cooked within the Deli? Grease Interceptors are required for projects exceeding 100 mg/l of oil and grease discharge. [site plan, pg 4]

See Document Markup

Walls greater than 4' must apply for a building permit. [site plan, pg 4]

See Document Markup

The existing driveway approach in this location will need to be removed as part of the development. (site plan, pg 2]

See Document Markup

The existing topography survey is now missing from the plans. Include this in the next submission. [site plan, pg 2]

Other/Miscellaneous

Revised plans not received as part of resubmittal package. Resubmit updated plans for Engineering Review. [Anthony Hulse @ 04/10/2024 12:31 PM]

Other/Miscellaneous

1. A 75' Fire Lane No Parking area will be required in front of the building on 17th Ave SE. Curb will be required to be painted red with Fire Lane No Parking signs. Show on site plan. 2. The F.D.C, P.I.V, and a new Fire Hydrant will be required to be placed in the landscape on 17th Ave SE. These shall be placed in the 75' fire lane zone. The F.D.C is required to be within 10-15' of the Fire Hydrant. Show locations on site plan.

Other/Miscellaneous

Traffic Scoping Comments: The scoping worksheet needs to use gross floor area for estimating trip generation per ITE. This site not located within the Good Samaritan Hospital campus and is not immediately adjacent to campus property. Use the stand-alone rates for LUC 720. Per ITE, there are no pass-by trips for LUC 720. Please recalculate trip generation by removing pass-by rates for this land use. The scoping worksheet assumptions are not consistent with architect drawing package Day spa, event space, have not been accounted for. All land uses must be included in trip generation calculations. Need more information on possible end user of retail space. Application describes as “future tenant space for either retail or service-type business: There’s a lot of variability within this type of land uses.

Other/Miscellaneous

General Comments: Traffic scoping worksheet will be required for this project. The City policy requires the project trips to be estimated using the Institute of Transportation Engineers’ (ITE) Trip Generation, 11th Edition. In general, trip generation regression equations shall be used when the R2 value is 0.70 or greater. For single-family units and offices smaller than 30,000 SF, use ITE’s Trip Generation, average rate. The project trips shall be rounded to the nearest tenth. Trip credits would be allowed for any existing development. Once the traffic scoping worksheet is reviewed, a written response would be sent to the applicant’s traffic engineer outlining the scope of the project’s Traffic Impact Study (TIS). The city has adopted a City-Wide Traffic Impact Fee of $4,500 per PM peak hour trip. Final fees will be calculated and assessed by the City at the time of building permit issuance. Per Puyallup Municipal Code Section 11.08.135, the applicant/owner would be expected to construct half-street improvements including curb, gutter, planter strip, sidewalk, roadway base, pavement, and street lighting. Any existing improvements which are damaged now or during construction, or which do not meet current City Standards, shall be replaced. Based on the materials submitted, 17th Ave SE along the site shall consist of 34-foot street with curb and gutter, sidewalk, wheelchair ramps (where applicable), street trees and streetlights in a 60-foot right-of-way (ROW). The improvements shall be measured from street centerline. City standard streetlights can likely connect with existing junction box on the SE corner of S Meridian/17th Ave SE. Frontage improvements on 17th Ave SE will require 4ft wide x 10ft long tree cutouts (with Silva cells) with a 8ft wide clear walking path (12ft wide frontage overall). Please coordinate with Engineering/Planning on specific details. Engineering may required an AMR (Alternative Methods Request) for the proposed frontage on S Meridian (maintain 8ft wide sidewalks). Commercial driveway shall be minimum 30ft wide. No dumpster storage/staging in ROW Entering sight distance analysis required (per City standards). Based on preliminary site plan, there appear to be multiple sight obstructions along S Meridian frontage. Analysis (horz + vertical) must confirm design will not have any sight obstruction At the time of civil permit review provide a separate street lighting sheet for the city to review. Remove existing curb cut along S Meridian See Fire comments regarding 75 foot Fire/Emergency on-street refuge area along 17th Ave SE frontage. This area will be placed between S Meridian and driveway. The property owner/operator will be required to maintain required FIRE signage/curb paint as necessary in perpetuity. Align driveway with the clinic across the street (their eastern driveway). Verify centered driveway on site plan. On site plan resubmittal, show details of existing 17th Ave SE frontage on the north side (curb alignment/offset, driveways, etc)

Other/Miscellaneous

Parking: Current proposal does not have adequate parking spaces Calculate required parking spaces assuming building will be utilized as a medical office building (100%) How will the applicant/owner restrict the future use of building. Additional medical office sqft would not be allowed in the future if adequate parking is not provided. Current proposal is only 9,663 sqft of medical office.

Other/Miscellaneous

SEPA Checklist 1. One public comment was received via e-mail by a neighboring property owner, Tim Rector at 1703 S Meridian. He expressed concern that there is not enough parking for the size of the building being proposed and that there are already issues with parking in the area. Mr. Rector has suggested there be a covenant placed on the building that allows for only so much medical office space to match the current parking requirements or to reduce the size of the building. He is concerned that if the entire building is proposed to be medical use, then people would start to park in his parking lot at 1703 S Meridian. Please review his full comment response under Documents & Images and provide a response in your re-submittal.

Add Submittal Item: Tree Risk Assessment for Significant Trees

Additional Submittal Item Required: Existing trees on the site which are larger than 15” in Diameter at Breast Height (DBH) are considered to be ‘significant trees’ and must be retained, where possible. If your site includes any significant trees, then you must include a tree risk assessment completed by a certified arborist and provided with your land use application and civil construction permit landscape plan. Any significant trees healthy enough to be retained in planned or required landscape areas shall be retained and shown on the landscape plans. See Vegetation Management Standards Plan Page 19 for criteria for significant tree retention. This report is required regardless if they are going to be torn down to build out the site.

See Document Markup

Per PMC 20.30.045 (1) - Exterior Mechanical Devices: Large mechanical equipment shall be screened from surrounding residentially zoned properties and public rights-of-way. Minor utility equipment, such as small generators, utility meters, air conditioners, or junction boxes, which are less than three and one-half feet in height, shall be exempt from screening requirements. Alternative methods for screening may include the use of building or parapet walls, sight-obscuring fencing and/or landscaping, equipment enclosures, consolidation and orientation of devices towards the center of the rooftop, and/or the use of neutral color surfaces. [site plan, A1.0]

Other/Miscellaneous

Per PMC 20.30.045 (12) Pedestrian Access and Circulation. Pedestrian walkways shall be constructed to provide safe, convenient and direct access between building entrances, transit facilities, passenger loading areas, public sidewalks, adjacent properties and pedestrian plazas. All parking lots which contain more than 90,000 square feet of paved area including driveways and traffic aisles shall include clearly defined pedestrian routes from parking stalls to main building entrances. All required walkways shall meet the following minimum requirements: (a) All walkways shall be a minimum of five feet wide with no encroachments (vehicle overhangs, displays, etc.) permitted; (b) All walkways shall be handicapped accessible and comply with the Washington State Barrier Free Design Standards; (c) All walkways shall be delineated by painted markings, distinctive pavement, or by being raised a minimum of six inches above the parking lot pavement; (d) Walkways within parking lots shall be located along major access corridors (primary driveway entrances between primary building entrances, etc.); and (e) Walkways within parking lots shall be integrated into interior landscape areas, whenever possible, to separate pedestrian access and vehicular travel routes.

Final Landscape Plan - Landscape Types

The City's Vegetation Management Standards Manual (VMS) outlines specific treatment “types” that are required to be adhered to, dependent upon the yard area the landscaping is located within Landscaping will be reviewed further as part of the final landscape plan required to be submitted with the civil permit application. See the VMS, sections 13 and 14 for full details on what each landscape treatment type requires.. The VMS can be downloaded here: https://www.cityofpuyallup.org/puyallupvms Front (west): Type IIa Street side (north): Type IIa Interior side (south): Type IIIb Rear (east): Type IIIa

See Document Markup

Elevations and plans are not consistent. Please adjust both to portray what is being proposed. Will this area on the SE corner be walled off and include steel doors for the trash enclosure as shown on page 2 of the elevation plans or will it be open as shown here? [elevations, A5.0]

See Document Markup

The planning director does not approve the proposed 20% parking reduction for native landscaping in the courtyard. More parking will need to be provided or the square footage of proposed uses will need to decrease. [site plan, A0.0]

Final Landscape Plan - Tree and utility conflicts

To avoid conflicts between underground and overhead utilities and trees as the grow and mature, please review the VMS tree installation standards table for required distances from various utilities and improvements.

See Document Markup

Only 131 stalls are required [site plan, A0.0]

See Document Markup

Per PMC 20.30.045 (7), trash and recycling receptacles shall be screened from adjacent properties and public right-of-ways by an opaque visual barrier no lower than the highest point of the receptacles. [site plan, A2.0]

See Document Markup

Include proposed retaining wall and details on landscape plans including height, setback, etc. See PMC 20.58.005 (2) for more information regarding standards for retaining walls for rear and side property lines. [landscape plan, L-1]

See Document Markup

Per PMC 20.30.037 (2)(c)(ii) an outdoor cafe may project into the required front or street side yard landscape buffer by a maximum of 6ft. A pathway from the sidewalk to the cafe through the landscape area would be allowed. [landscape plan, A1.0]

Max Building Height

The maximum building height in this zone is 50ft. Please calculate the height of the structure and provide the calculation on the elevation plans. The City determines height as follows: The vertical distance from the lower of the finished average adjoining grade to the top of a flat roof, the crown of a mansard roof, or to the mean height between the eaves and ridge of a gable, hip, gambrel or similar pitched roof. The ridge of a gable, hip, gambrel or similar pitched roof shall not extend over eight feet above the specified maximum height limit. Church steeples, chimneys, elevator penthouses, vents and similar enclosures or equipment shall not be considered for the purpose of determining building or structure height, as long as such enclosures or equipment do not cover a significant portion of the roof area. “Adjoining grade” means the ground level at a given point adjacent to a structure. “Adjoining grade, average” means a single reference elevation which indicates the average grade or ground level of the perimeter of a structure, based on the sum of the existing or finished grade elevations, whichever is lower, which are adjacent to an exterior wall. Average adjoining grade (A.A.G.) is calculated by the following: A.A.G. = SUM(AE x WL)/SUM WL where AE is the average ground elevation between each two-foot contour line adjacent to the perimeter of the structure or part of structure for which the A.A.G. is being calculated; and where WL is the wall length between each two-foot contour line described above.

Other/Miscellaneous

Per PMC 20.26.300 (1)(c) Roofline Modulation. If the continuous roofline exceeds 50 feet in length on a building with a flat, gabled, hipped or similar roof, or on a roofline with slopes of less than three feet vertical to 12 feet horizontal, the following methods shall be used: (i) The height of the visible roofline must change at least four feet if the adjacent roof segments are less than 50 feet in length. (ii) The height of the visible roofline must change at least eight feet if the adjacent roof segments are 50 feet or more in length. Please re-submit plans meeting this requirement.

See Document Markup

Per PMC 20.26.300 (3)(b)(i), the pedestrian-oriented plaza spaces in front of the building shall be covered by awnings covering at least 6ft of the plaza space for the entirety of the plaza length. Please resubmit plans with the awning spanning the entire length of the plaza area on both the north and west side. [elevations, A4.1]

See Document Markup

If the maximum height of the building is exceeded, then the proposed wall planes may be exceeding what is allowed in PMC 20.26.300 (1) Building Wall and Roof Modulation. In a separate comment, I requested that the height calculation be shown on the plans. If the proposed elevations must change in order to meet maximum height, please also update elevations to reflect and meet PMC 20.26.300 (1) (a) and (b) PMC 20.26.300 (1) All buildings which contain two or more stories or have a building footprint of more than 10,000 square feet or which have any façade length greater than 100 feet, and which will be visible from a public street or residential zone for more than three years beyond the date of construction completion, shall use the following elements and features in design and construction of the building: (a) Wall Plane Proportions. No wall plane visible from any public right-of-way shall be wider than two and one-half times the height of the wall plane. (A wall plane is a flat vertical surface on a building façade, which may include doors, windows, openings, or other incidental recessions that do not extend through to the roofline.) (b) Horizontal Modulation. All building walls shall provide horizontal modulation consistent with the following standards: (i) The maximum allowable horizontal length of a building wall between modulations is 100 feet; (ii) The minimum depth of each modulation is 10 feet; and (iii) The minimum width of each modulation is 15 feet. [elevations, A4.1]

See Document Markup

Per PMC 20.26.300 (2) (a) Any wall or portion of a wall which is visible from a public street or residential zone and contains at least 400 square feet of surface area without any window, door, building wall modulation or other architectural feature shall screen or treat the wall using at least two of the methods or techniques found in PMC 20.26.300 (20(a)(i-iii) [elevations, A4.0]

See Document Markup

6ft wide perimeter landscape buffer is required. Please adjust all plans accordingly. [landscape plan, A1.0]

Other/Miscellaneous

Please see Documents & Images for the full comment letters from Agencies in response to the Notice of Application: - Department of Ecology (NOA Response - ECY Comments 08302023) - Nisqually Indian Tribe (NOA Response - Nisqually Indian Tribe 08242023) - Squaxin Island Tribe (NOA Response - Squaxin Island Tribe 08222023)

Other/Miscellaneous

1. Plans need to be complete with all building, plumbing, mechanical, energy code and accessibility requirements items on plans. 2. Provide Building Area calculations per section 506 to meet Table 506.2 with Washington State Amendments for total allowable square footage. 3. Need to submit all truss specs with building permit application if applicable. 4. Currently we are using all the 2018 codes and the many Washington State Amendments adopted February 1, 2021. Currently has been extended to March 14, 2024 for complete submittal. 5. Need to show the required infrastructure for the electric charging stations, INDICATED IN PARKING CACULATIONS ALL REQUIRED EV PARKING REQUIREMENTS. REFERENCE WAC 51-50-0429 FOR 2021 AS SIGNIFICANT CHANGES WILL BE WITHIN THE ADOPTION OF THE 2021 I-CODES ANTICIPATED MARCH 15, 2023. REFERENCE TABLE 429.2 FOR ALL EV REQUIREMENTS BY OCCUPANCY GROUP. SEE COMMENT PAGE A0.0 6. Clearly define all fire rated assemblies on the plans and provide UL details for construction and inspections. 7. All electrical is through the department of L & I electrical division. 8. Need to define all required accessible parking spaces and the accessible route to the public way on the site plans.

Other/Miscellaneous

1. A 75' Fire Lane No Parking area will be required in front of the building on 17th Ave SE. Curb will be required to be painted red with Fire Lane No Parking signs. Show on site plan. 2. The F.D.C, P.I.V, and a new Fire Hydrant will be required to be placed in the landscape on 17th Ave SE. These shall be placed in the 75' fire lane zone. The F.D.C is required to be within 10-15' of the Fire Hydrant. Show locations on site plan.

See Document Markup

Provide a sheet index for the plan set. [site plan, pg 1]

See Document Markup

Provide the engineering firm name and contact information within the prelminary plan sheets. [site plan, pg 1]

See Document Markup

Provide the north arrow. [site plan, pg 3]

See Document Markup

Include Figure I-3.5: Flow Chart for determining wetland protection level requirements. Continuous modeling will be necessary to ensure the hydroperiod of the wetland remains unaltered. [drainage report, pg 9]

See Document Markup

Show water, sewer and stormwater mains within 17th Ave SE and South Meridian. [site plan, pg 3]

See Document Markup

Provide right of way widths for both 17th Ave SE and South Meridian. [site plan, pg 3]

See Document Markup

Trash enlcosures must meet city design standard 208.1. Revise accordingly. [site plan, pg 3]

See Document Markup

Provide additional spot elevations for the proposed driveway approach. The maximum allowed slope is 10%. [site plan, pg 3]

See Document Markup

Denote the entrances to the building. Hi-light the pedestrian access route(s) from the public right of way to the building. [site plan, pg 3]

See Document Markup

Provide a detail for the proposed detention system. [site plan, pg 4]

See Document Markup

Provide IE's for the proposed detention system and downstream connection. Will the project have to pump stormwater? [site plan, pg 4]

See Document Markup

Provide an oil-water separator for the underground parking. The OWS will need to be connected to sanitary sewer. [site plan, pg 4]

See Document Markup

The soil and groundwater conditions on page 2 of the geotech report is missing a majority of the letters and illegible. Revise for the resubmittal. [geotech report, pg 2]

See Document Markup

The post-developed conditions for the map on page 17 state the pervious area is 0.262 acres. Revise accordingly. [drainage report, pg 17]

See Document Markup

Include a bypass basin for the frontage improvements along 17th Ave SE. [drainage report, pg 17]

See Document Markup

Revise the impervious areas to match the post-developed conditions per the map/table on page 16 of the stormwater report. [drainage report, pg 18]

See Document Markup

Callout/add to the legend the existing street light on the existing and proposed plans. [site plan, pg 2]

See Document Markup

Callout the existing bus stop sign. [site plan, pg 2]

See Document Markup

Include the parcel number: 7790000140. [site plan, pg 2]

See Document Markup

Show the project connecting into the existing curb, gutter and sidewalk to the east. [site plan, pg 3]

See Document Markup

Provide additional WWHM modeling showing the wetland hydroperiod remaining unaltered per the DOE's criteria. [drainage report, pg 17]

See Document Markup

Provide horizontal and vertical datums for the survey. Vertical datums should be NAVD 88. [site plan, pg 2]

See Document Markup

Will this be a rollout trash can like a single family residence or a larger trash enlcosure? [site plan, pg 3]

See Document Markup

Provide the dimensions of the proposed detention vault. The WWHM calculation determined a 28'X74'X7' vault. [site plan, pg 4]

See Document Markup

Include the total square footage of the impervious area. [site plan, pg 3]

See Document Markup

Clearly denote the property line and add the linetype to the legend. [site plan, pg 2]

See Document Markup

Add DP-1 and DP-2 to to the legend. [site plan, pg 2]

See Document Markup

Show water mains within Meridian and 17th Ave SE. [site plan, pg 2]

See Document Markup

Provide a city standard streetlight along 17th Ave SE. It should be spaced a maximum 150' from the light at the intersection of Meridian and 17th Ave SE. [site plan, pg 3]

See Document Markup

What kind of food if any will be cooked within the Deli? Grease Interceptors are required for projects exceeding 100 mg/l of oil and grease discharge. [site plan, pg 4]

See Document Markup

Walls greater than 4' must apply for a building permit. [site plan, pg 4]

See Document Markup

The existing driveway approach in this location will need to be removed as part of the development. (site plan, pg 2]