| Review Type |
Outcome |
Est. Completion Date |
Completed |
|
Building Review
|
No Comments
|
10/19/2023
|
10/05/2023
|
|
|
|
|
|
BLTR - Add Submittal Item: Geotech - Soil
Additional Submittal Item: Provide a Geo-Tech report for soils with the building permit applications.
|
|
|
BLTR - Demolition
A separate demolition permit will be required for the demo of the structures currently on the site and will require documentation from the Puget Sound Clean Air agency at the time of submittal for the demo permit.
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
Building plans will need to be complete with all building, mechanical, plumbing, energy code items and accessibility requirements that apply to project.
The proposed Code Analysis (sheet G0.01) claims the building area been calculated on unlimited area buildings (section 507). Per 507.2.1 reduced open space the minimum reduced shall not be less then 40 feet with 3 conditions. Appears you meet the 3 conditions on sheet A1.10 but the site plan reflects 38 feet to the south property line adjacent to the Union Pacific Railroad. Provide code path how it can be reduced to 38 feet or revise site plan to reflect required 40 feet setback.
Two different construction types and occupancies are noted, application notes IIIB, S-1 or S-2 and B and the Site Plan (G0.01) notes VB, S-1, F-1 and B. Acknowledge this preliminary but upon submittal for permits all construction types and occupancy will need to match.
Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure are required in place for charging stations per IBC section 429 Washington State amendments for occupancy B square footage and will need to be shown on the plans. None are currently noted in parking calculations or on the site plan. **Note if building permit is applied for after July 1, 2023, the EV parking requirements change to require EV parking provided for all occupancies.
Plans will need to be per the applicable codes 2018 adopted February 1, 2021, for all permits. Unless submitted after July 1, 2023, to current state adopted code.
All electrical is permitted by the Washington State Department L & I.
Accessible parking and access to the public way will be required. For all accessible requirements the City adopted the 2018 IBC / WAC 51-50 and the ICC A117.1-2009 standard. Minimum one electric vehicle charging infrastructure is required to be accessible.
**Note if permit is applied after July 1, 2023, there are significate accessibility requirements changes in the code.
If VB construction the truss specs will also be required with the truss engineers’ stamps and a layout that matches the submitted plans at the time of submittal.
Please reach out to me if I can answer any other questions in relationship to Building code items for this project. No other Building items at this time.
|
|
|
BLTR - Codes
COMMENTS DUE 07/27/2023
New comment ***Sheet A1.10 reflects two electric charging parking stalls to be included in the proposed parking layout. The anticipated adoption date of the 2021 I-codes October 28, 2023. Per 2021 IBC section 429 (Washington State Amendments) with WAC 51-50-0429 has substantial changes in the Electric vehicle charging infrastructure requirements. Please review the new standard and be prepared to update the EV parking number based on Table 429.2 of the 2021 IBC including WAC 51-50-0429.
Building plans will need to be complete with all building, mechanical, plumbing, energy code items and accessibility requirements that apply to project. Provide a Geo-Tech report for soils with the building permit applications.
The proposed Code Analysis (sheet G0.01) claims the building area been calculated on unlimited area buildings (section 507). Per 507.2.1 reduced open space the minimum reduced shall not be less then 40 feet with 3 conditions. Appears you meet the 3 conditions on sheet A1.10 but the site plan reflects 38 feet to the south property line adjacent to the Union Pacific Railroad. Provide code path how it can be reduced to 38 feet or revise site plan to reflect required 40 feet setback.
Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure are required in place for charging stations per IBC section 429 Washington State amendments for occupancy B square footage and will need to be shown on the plans. None are currently noted in parking calculations or on the site plan. **Note if building permit is applied for after October 28, 2023, the EV parking requirements change to require EV parking provided for all occupancies.
Plans will need to be per the applicable codes 2018 adopted February 1, 2021, for all permits. Unless submitted after October 28, 2023, to current state adopted code.
All electrical is permitted by the Washington State Department L & I.
Accessible parking and access to the public way will be required. For all accessible requirements the City adopted the 2018 IBC / WAC 51-50 and the ICC A117.1-2009 standard. Minimum one electric vehicle charging infrastructure is required to be accessible.
**Note if permit is applied after October 28, 2023, there are significate accessibility requirements changes in the code.
If VB construction the truss specs will also be required with the truss engineers’ stamps and a layout that matches the submitted plans at the time of submittal.
A separate demolition permit will be required for the demo of the structures currently on the site and will require documentation from the Puget Sound Clean Air agency at the time of submittal for the demo permit.
Signs are separate permit.
Separate electrical permit is required with Washington State Department of Labor & Industries.
https://lni.wa.gov/licensing-permits/electrical/electrical-permits-fees-and-inspections or Licensing information: Call 1-800-647-0982
|
|
|
Building permits have been submitted for review.
|
|
Engineering Traffic Review
|
No Comments
|
10/19/2023
|
09/28/2023
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Label EV gate as electronic w/Opticom per conditions of the approved AMR [Site Plan P3]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
City standards require minimum 35ft curb radius for this commercial driveway [Site Plan P3]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
For civil submittal, extend empty conduit (w/pull string) + j-box to the north side of driveway. This will allow the City to expand street lights along this corridor in the future.
[Site Plan P3]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
For civil submittal, extend empty conduit (w/pull string) + j-box to the north side of driveway. This will allow the City to expand street lights along this corridor in the future.
[Site Plan P3]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Show fire apparatus maneuvering site. Coordinate with David Drake on type and size of vehicle to model. [Site Plan P5]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Determine the required radius on the north side of intersection to allow inbound right trucks to access site without encroaching into adjacent lanes of traffic. [TS-1.0]
|
|
|
|
|
Planning Review
|
No Comments
|
10/19/2023
|
09/28/2023
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
Per our e-mail correspondence and my e-mail sent on July 24, 2023:
We can remove the requirement for the berm along the rear property lines and a 1:3 slope will not be required. We will required Type 1a landscaping, which does not include a berm.
Type Ia
Type Ia is intended to be used in scenarios where more than 15 feet of landscaping yard width is present, particularly if used pursuant to PMC 20.26.500 as a zone transition landscaping area. Two staggered rows of evergreen trees (of differing species) with evergreen and deciduous shrubs arranged to provide 100 percent visual separation from ground level up to six feet within three years from time of installation. Native conifers shall be used. Appropriate shrub masses and living ground cover (excluding turf grass) shall provide 75 percent ground area coverage within three years. A six-foot-high masonry wall or wood opaque fence shall be established and maintained along the common property line at either edge of the landscape buffer. Type 1d also may be used in lieu of this standard for specific land uses and situations where additional screening is warranted, as determined by the Director. Bio-swales or rain gardens may be placed within these landscaping areas as long as they are designed to meet the intent
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
It appears that this calculation was only done for the trailer parking area. This calculation needs to be made for the entire site as well. Please include on your resubmittal the 10% landscaped minimum for the entire paved area of the site.
Please provide calculations on the landscape plans that show that at least 10% of all paved areas are landscaped in accordance with PMC 20.58.005. [landscape plans, L0.01]:
In order to further mitigate the impacts of more substantial expanses of paved areas on development sites, the following shall apply:
(1) All paved areas of over 10,000 square feet shall have at least five percent of all paved areas landscaped to provide shade to reduce the heat island effect related to paved surfaces, reduce stormwater runoff, improve air quality, provide visual breaks to large paved areas and improve general appearance. Perimeter landscaping shall not be calculated as part of the required amount of internal parking lot landscaping. Internal parking lot landscaping design and spacing shall conform to the “Type IV” landscaping standards contained in the city’s vegetation management standards (VMS) manual.
(a) In the event that a project provides 20 percent more than the required minimum number of parking stalls (per PMC 20.55.010) for a specific use or group of uses on a development complex site, or in the event that the total sum of paved areas on a site exceeds 100,000 square feet, at least 10 percent of all paved areas shall be landscaped in accordance with this section and the vegetation management standards (VMS) manual.
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Review
|
No Comments
|
10/19/2023
|
09/18/2023
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Document Markup
The pre-developed land use basin (5.213 acres) and proposed land use basin (5.44 acres) do not match, revise accordingly. [drainage report, pg 38]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
The west TDA pre-developed land-use basin (5.213 acres) and post-developed (5.44 acres) basins do not match, this is a difference of about 10,000SF. Per the comment response letter the proposed basin is slightly larger due to grading and site layout. Provide an analysis for matching basins for the pre-developed and post-developed conditions. Comparing different sized basins does meet the intent of minimum requirement #7. [drainage report, pg 40]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide a wetland report which provides the habitat score to determine the required mitigation. [drainage report, pg 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
The East basin of the site shall be modeled as forested for the pre-existing conditions, unless reasonable historic information is provided that indicates the site was prairie prior to settlement. See the Flow Control Performance Standard. [drainage report, pg 27]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
The pre and post development discharges for the east basin do not match, see previous comment regarding the west basin sizes not being equal in size. [drainage report, pg 80]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Include the replaced sidewalk within the east basin analysis. [drainage report, pg 31]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
City of Puyallup approval blocks are not required for preliminary site plans. Please remove. [site plan, pg 2]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
The drawing index is not accurate. Revise accordingly. [site plan, pg 1]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Create a soils report note 6 that speaks to the known soil contamination within the lot. [site plan, pg 2]
|
|
|
|
|
Fire Review
|
No Comments
|
10/19/2023
|
09/11/2023
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Planning Review
|
Comments
|
07/27/2023
|
08/01/2023
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Signage is applied for and permitted through a sign permit and subject to the special sign code provisions for the ML zone found in PMC 20.60.055 [exterior elevations, A2.00]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
You have noted that there is a water easement that crosses through where the landscaping is required on the northern portion of the site along the interior side yard. In the pre-app notes, planning commented that although trees may not be able to be planted here due to the waterline, you would need to substitute trees for adequate shrubbery and other vegetation required in the landscape buffer. Vegetation is required to be planted in this area interior to the site.
The minimum distance from underground water, sewer, or storm is 10'. [landscape plans, L0.01]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Landscape islands every eight stalls are required for trailer parking [landscape plans, L0.01]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Perimeter landscaping required to be 12' [landscape plans, L1.10]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Parking landscape islands not meeting required widths
Perimeter: 12’ wide
Internal: 15’ wide
[landscape plan, L1.10]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Trees required to be planted in landscape area abutting wall [landscape plans, L1.10]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Trees required to be planted in the blank wall landscaping [landscape plans, L1.10]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Parking landscape islands not meeting required widths
Perimeter: 12’ wide
Internal: 15’ wide
[landscape plan, L1.11]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Please add another wide vegetative screen wall here [elevations, A2.00]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
|
|
|
See Document Markup
The perimeter of all parking areas and associated access drives which abut public right-of ways shall be screened with on-site landscaping, earth berms, fencing, or a combination of both [landscape plans, L1.10]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
PMC 20.26.400 (1) requires that the 15 wide landscape strip along blank walls include a mixture of medium to large evergreen conifer and deciduous trees and shrubs. Please include trees on the landscape plan chosen from class II, II, or IV street tree list in the VMS. [landscape plans, L1.10 & L1.11]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
3.Please add soil cells to the 66 blank wall landscape area [landscape plans, L1.10 & L1.11]
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
Per our e-mail correspondence and my e-mail sent on July 24, 2023:
We can remove the requirement for the berm along the rear property lines and a 1:3 slope will not be required. We will required Type 1a landscaping, which does not include a berm.
Type Ia
Type Ia is intended to be used in scenarios where more than 15 feet of landscaping yard width is present, particularly if used pursuant to PMC 20.26.500 as a zone transition landscaping area. Two staggered rows of evergreen trees (of differing species) with evergreen and deciduous shrubs arranged to provide 100 percent visual separation from ground level up to six feet within three years from time of installation. Native conifers shall be used. Appropriate shrub masses and living ground cover (excluding turf grass) shall provide 75 percent ground area coverage within three years. A six-foot-high masonry wall or wood opaque fence shall be established and maintained along the common property line at either edge of the landscape buffer. Type 1d also may be used in lieu of this standard for specific land uses and situations where additional screening is warranted, as determined by the Director. Bio-swales or rain gardens may be placed within these landscaping areas as long as they are designed to meet the intent
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
It appears that this calculation was only done for the trailer parking area. This calculation needs to be made for the entire site as well. Please include on your resubmittal the 10% landscaped minimum for the entire paved area of the site.
Please provide calculations on the landscape plans that show that at least 10% of all paved areas are landscaped in accordance with PMC 20.58.005. [landscape plans, L0.01]:
In order to further mitigate the impacts of more substantial expanses of paved areas on development sites, the following shall apply:
(1) All paved areas of over 10,000 square feet shall have at least five percent of all paved areas landscaped to provide shade to reduce the heat island effect related to paved surfaces, reduce stormwater runoff, improve air quality, provide visual breaks to large paved areas and improve general appearance. Perimeter landscaping shall not be calculated as part of the required amount of internal parking lot landscaping. Internal parking lot landscaping design and spacing shall conform to the “Type IV” landscaping standards contained in the city’s vegetation management standards (VMS) manual.
(a) In the event that a project provides 20 percent more than the required minimum number of parking stalls (per PMC 20.55.010) for a specific use or group of uses on a development complex site, or in the event that the total sum of paved areas on a site exceeds 100,000 square feet, at least 10 percent of all paved areas shall be landscaped in accordance with this section and the vegetation management standards (VMS) manual.
|
|
|
|
|
Fire Review
|
No Comments
|
07/27/2023
|
07/27/2023
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Traffic Review
|
Comments
|
07/27/2023
|
07/26/2023
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
Traffic Impact Analysis (1-13-23) Comments:
Markups sent directly to TENW 1/27/23
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
General Comments:
See document markups.
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Proposed driveway does not meet minimum spacing standards.
Per previous communication & pre-application comments:
-15th St SE along the site is designated as a Minor Arterial. City standards (Section 101.10.1) require minimum spacing of 300 feet from the intersection & driveways measured between closest edges of the driveway.
-Per City standards, commercial driveways must be aligned with intersections/driveways across the street.
[Site plan P3]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Proposed driveway does not meet minimum spacing standards.
Per previous communication & pre-application comments:
-15th St SE along the site is designated as a Minor Arterial. City standards (Section 101.10.1) require minimum spacing of 300 feet from the intersection & driveways measured between closest edges of the driveway.
-Per City standards, commercial driveways must be aligned with intersections/driveways across the street.
[Site plan P3]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Per previous communication & pre-application comments:
This commercial/industrial development shall provide an AutoTurn analysis for the largest anticipated vehicle that would access the site (WB-67, fire apparatus). Curb radii and entrance dimensions shall be increased as necessary to allow vehicles to access the site without encroaching into adjacent lanes of traffic.
Include EBR truck movement analysis at E Main/15th St SE intersection.
[Site plan P3]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Show preliminary locations for City standard streetlights. This development will require streetlights every 150ft (minimum) spacing along frontage. 4-5 required streetlights to meet standards. Skyline service cabinet must be placed outside sight triangle
[Site plan P3]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Parking spaces shall not be located within the driveway throat (related terms include the driveway connection depth, reservoir length, stacking distance, storage length etc.). The proposed parking spaces will cause blocking events that will cause undesirable operational issues.
[Site plan P3]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide comprehensive sight distance analysis. City of Puyallup requires 350ft of available ESD. Assume 18ft setback from face of curb to simulate trucks.
[Site plan P3]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide comprehensive sight distance analysis along frontage to ensure landscaping doesn't interfere with sight lines. Also, evaluate RR flasher visibility for approaching vehicles. Assume AASHTO truck eye height
[L1.10]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Show extent of half-street paving along frontage. A separate streetlight & channelization design will be required for civil plan submittal.
[Site plan P3]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Clearly identify existing driveways on the east side of 15th St SE
[Site plan P3]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Coordinate with garbage service provider on the proposed trash pickup location
[Site plan P3]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Label EV gate as electronic w/Opticom per conditions of the approved AMR [Site Plan P3]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
City standards require minimum 35ft curb radius for this commercial driveway [Site Plan P3]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
For civil submittal, extend empty conduit (w/pull string) + j-box to the north side of driveway. This will allow the City to expand street lights along this corridor in the future.
[Site Plan P3]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
For civil submittal, extend empty conduit (w/pull string) + j-box to the north side of driveway. This will allow the City to expand street lights along this corridor in the future.
[Site Plan P3]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Show fire apparatus maneuvering site. Coordinate with David Drake on type and size of vehicle to model. [Site Plan P5]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Determine the required radius on the north side of intersection to allow inbound right trucks to access site without encroaching into adjacent lanes of traffic. [TS-1.0]
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Review
|
Comments
|
07/27/2023
|
07/24/2023
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Document Markup
The Engineering approval block is outdated, you can find the most up to date here: https://www.cityofpuyallup.org/DocumentCenter/View/6921/Section-10-Engineering-Services-Review-Process?bidId= [site plan, pg 2]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Include City of Puyallup Sewer and stormwater in the utilities/services list. [site plan, pg 2]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add this hatch to the legend. [site plan, pg 3]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide a scale for the vicinity map. [site plan, pg 2]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
The geotech report is blurry, provide a new copy during the next submission. [drainage report, pg 12]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Update MR 4. The site discharges to Deer Creek which discharges to the Puyallup River. [Drainage report, pg 15]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide the following surfaces in a table format in square feet/acres for the west and east threshold discharge areas:
*Pollution Generating Hard Surfaces
*Effective impervious areas
[drainage plans, pg 29]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
The pre-developed land use basin (5.213 acres) and proposed land use basin (5.44 acres) do not match, revise accordingly. [drainage report, pg 38]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Where did this printout come from? It appears that the vault meets the flow control requirement on page 50, but this information is contradictive. [drainage report, pg 53]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Why are the basin sizes being altered between the existing and proposed conditions? [drainage plans, pg 25]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Fill out and include Figure III-1.1: Runoff Treatment BMP Selection flow chart. [drainage report, pg 18]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide figure I-3.5: Flow Chart for Determining Wetland Protection Level Requirements. [drainage report, pg 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide a preliminary WWHM calculation for the wetland protection as required by the flow chart to ensure they hydroperiod of the wetland is not altered . [drainage report, pg 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide the square footages of each parcel. [site plan, pg 3]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Depict/label the water mains in 15th St SE. [site plan, pg 3]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Easements AFN 8212150220 and 1084061 are historic and the city does not have access per Pierce County's Recorded Documents, provide a copy of these easements during the next submittal. [site plan, pg 3]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide dimensions between the underground detention system and the new building, and adjacent property lines. [site plan, pg 4]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide the total proposed impervious area in square feet. [site plan, pg 4]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Show AFN 20190090363 on this sheet. Does this easement restrict the placement of the storm vault in this area? [civils, pg 4]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Include the pervious/impervious areas in 15th St SE that is within the east basin as part of this project. [drainage plans, pg 29]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
What are these triangles representing? [civils, pg 4]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
The west TDA pre-developed land-use basin (5.213 acres) and post-developed (5.44 acres) basins do not match, this is a difference of about 10,000SF. Per the comment response letter the proposed basin is slightly larger due to grading and site layout. Provide an analysis for matching basins for the pre-developed and post-developed conditions. Comparing different sized basins does meet the intent of minimum requirement #7. [drainage report, pg 40]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide a wetland report which provides the habitat score to determine the required mitigation. [drainage report, pg 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
The East basin of the site shall be modeled as forested for the pre-existing conditions, unless reasonable historic information is provided that indicates the site was prairie prior to settlement. See the Flow Control Performance Standard. [drainage report, pg 27]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
The pre and post development discharges for the east basin do not match, see previous comment regarding the west basin sizes not being equal in size. [drainage report, pg 80]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Include the replaced sidewalk within the east basin analysis. [drainage report, pg 31]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
City of Puyallup approval blocks are not required for preliminary site plans. Please remove. [site plan, pg 2]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
A double detector check valve assembly (DDCVA) will be required on the fire service line to the building. Revise accordingly. [site plan, pg 4]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
The drawing index is not accurate. Revise accordingly. [site plan, pg 1]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Create a soils report note 6 that speaks to the known soil contamination within the lot. [site plan, pg 2]
|
|
|
|
|
Building Review
|
Comments
|
07/27/2023
|
07/21/2023
|
|
|
|
|
|
BLTR - Add Submittal Item: Geotech - Soil
Additional Submittal Item: Provide a Geo-Tech report for soils with the building permit applications.
|
|
|
BLTR - Demolition
A separate demolition permit will be required for the demo of the structures currently on the site and will require documentation from the Puget Sound Clean Air agency at the time of submittal for the demo permit.
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
Building plans will need to be complete with all building, mechanical, plumbing, energy code items and accessibility requirements that apply to project.
The proposed Code Analysis (sheet G0.01) claims the building area been calculated on unlimited area buildings (section 507). Per 507.2.1 reduced open space the minimum reduced shall not be less then 40 feet with 3 conditions. Appears you meet the 3 conditions on sheet A1.10 but the site plan reflects 38 feet to the south property line adjacent to the Union Pacific Railroad. Provide code path how it can be reduced to 38 feet or revise site plan to reflect required 40 feet setback.
Two different construction types and occupancies are noted, application notes IIIB, S-1 or S-2 and B and the Site Plan (G0.01) notes VB, S-1, F-1 and B. Acknowledge this preliminary but upon submittal for permits all construction types and occupancy will need to match.
Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure are required in place for charging stations per IBC section 429 Washington State amendments for occupancy B square footage and will need to be shown on the plans. None are currently noted in parking calculations or on the site plan. **Note if building permit is applied for after July 1, 2023, the EV parking requirements change to require EV parking provided for all occupancies.
Plans will need to be per the applicable codes 2018 adopted February 1, 2021, for all permits. Unless submitted after July 1, 2023, to current state adopted code.
All electrical is permitted by the Washington State Department L & I.
Accessible parking and access to the public way will be required. For all accessible requirements the City adopted the 2018 IBC / WAC 51-50 and the ICC A117.1-2009 standard. Minimum one electric vehicle charging infrastructure is required to be accessible.
**Note if permit is applied after July 1, 2023, there are significate accessibility requirements changes in the code.
If VB construction the truss specs will also be required with the truss engineers’ stamps and a layout that matches the submitted plans at the time of submittal.
Please reach out to me if I can answer any other questions in relationship to Building code items for this project. No other Building items at this time.
|
|
|
BLTR - Codes
COMMENTS DUE 07/27/2023
New comment ***Sheet A1.10 reflects two electric charging parking stalls to be included in the proposed parking layout. The anticipated adoption date of the 2021 I-codes October 28, 2023. Per 2021 IBC section 429 (Washington State Amendments) with WAC 51-50-0429 has substantial changes in the Electric vehicle charging infrastructure requirements. Please review the new standard and be prepared to update the EV parking number based on Table 429.2 of the 2021 IBC including WAC 51-50-0429.
Building plans will need to be complete with all building, mechanical, plumbing, energy code items and accessibility requirements that apply to project. Provide a Geo-Tech report for soils with the building permit applications.
The proposed Code Analysis (sheet G0.01) claims the building area been calculated on unlimited area buildings (section 507). Per 507.2.1 reduced open space the minimum reduced shall not be less then 40 feet with 3 conditions. Appears you meet the 3 conditions on sheet A1.10 but the site plan reflects 38 feet to the south property line adjacent to the Union Pacific Railroad. Provide code path how it can be reduced to 38 feet or revise site plan to reflect required 40 feet setback.
Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure are required in place for charging stations per IBC section 429 Washington State amendments for occupancy B square footage and will need to be shown on the plans. None are currently noted in parking calculations or on the site plan. **Note if building permit is applied for after October 28, 2023, the EV parking requirements change to require EV parking provided for all occupancies.
Plans will need to be per the applicable codes 2018 adopted February 1, 2021, for all permits. Unless submitted after October 28, 2023, to current state adopted code.
All electrical is permitted by the Washington State Department L & I.
Accessible parking and access to the public way will be required. For all accessible requirements the City adopted the 2018 IBC / WAC 51-50 and the ICC A117.1-2009 standard. Minimum one electric vehicle charging infrastructure is required to be accessible.
**Note if permit is applied after October 28, 2023, there are significate accessibility requirements changes in the code.
If VB construction the truss specs will also be required with the truss engineers’ stamps and a layout that matches the submitted plans at the time of submittal.
A separate demolition permit will be required for the demo of the structures currently on the site and will require documentation from the Puget Sound Clean Air agency at the time of submittal for the demo permit.
Signs are separate permit.
Separate electrical permit is required with Washington State Department of Labor & Industries.
https://lni.wa.gov/licensing-permits/electrical/electrical-permits-fees-and-inspections or Licensing information: Call 1-800-647-0982
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Traffic Review
|
Revisions Required
|
12/17/2022
|
01/27/2023
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
Traffic Impact Analysis (1-13-23) Comments:
Markups sent directly to TENW 1/27/23
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
General Comments:
See document markups.
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Proposed driveway does not meet minimum spacing standards.
Per previous communication & pre-application comments:
-15th St SE along the site is designated as a Minor Arterial. City standards (Section 101.10.1) require minimum spacing of 300 feet from the intersection & driveways measured between closest edges of the driveway.
-Per City standards, commercial driveways must be aligned with intersections/driveways across the street.
[Site plan P3]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Proposed driveway does not meet minimum spacing standards.
Per previous communication & pre-application comments:
-15th St SE along the site is designated as a Minor Arterial. City standards (Section 101.10.1) require minimum spacing of 300 feet from the intersection & driveways measured between closest edges of the driveway.
-Per City standards, commercial driveways must be aligned with intersections/driveways across the street.
[Site plan P3]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Per previous communication & pre-application comments:
This commercial/industrial development shall provide an AutoTurn analysis for the largest anticipated vehicle that would access the site (WB-67, fire apparatus). Curb radii and entrance dimensions shall be increased as necessary to allow vehicles to access the site without encroaching into adjacent lanes of traffic.
Include EBR truck movement analysis at E Main/15th St SE intersection.
[Site plan P3]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Show preliminary locations for City standard streetlights. This development will require streetlights every 150ft (minimum) spacing along frontage. 4-5 required streetlights to meet standards. Skyline service cabinet must be placed outside sight triangle
[Site plan P3]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Parking spaces shall not be located within the driveway throat (related terms include the driveway connection depth, reservoir length, stacking distance, storage length etc.). The proposed parking spaces will cause blocking events that will cause undesirable operational issues.
[Site plan P3]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide comprehensive sight distance analysis. City of Puyallup requires 350ft of available ESD. Assume 18ft setback from face of curb to simulate trucks.
[Site plan P3]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide comprehensive sight distance analysis along frontage to ensure landscaping doesn't interfere with sight lines. Also, evaluate RR flasher visibility for approaching vehicles. Assume AASHTO truck eye height
[L1.10]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Show extent of half-street paving along frontage. A separate streetlight & channelization design will be required for civil plan submittal.
[Site plan P3]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Clearly identify existing driveways on the east side of 15th St SE
[Site plan P3]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Coordinate with garbage service provider on the proposed trash pickup location
[Site plan P3]
|
|
|
|
|
Planning Review
|
Revisions Required
|
12/17/2022
|
01/03/2023
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Signage is applied for and permitted through a sign permit and subject to the special sign code provisions for the ML zone found in PMC 20.60.055 [exterior elevations, A2.00]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
You have noted that there is a water easement that crosses through where the landscaping is required on the northern portion of the site along the interior side yard. In the pre-app notes, planning commented that although trees may not be able to be planted here due to the waterline, you would need to substitute trees for adequate shrubbery and other vegetation required in the landscape buffer. Vegetation is required to be planted in this area interior to the site.
The minimum distance from underground water, sewer, or storm is 10'. [landscape plans, L0.01]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Landscape islands every eight stalls are required for trailer parking [landscape plans, L0.01]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Perimeter landscaping required to be 12' [landscape plans, L1.10]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Parking landscape islands not meeting required widths
Perimeter: 12’ wide
Internal: 15’ wide
[landscape plan, L1.10]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Trees required to be planted in landscape area abutting wall [landscape plans, L1.10]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Trees required to be planted in the blank wall landscaping [landscape plans, L1.10]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Parking landscape islands not meeting required widths
Perimeter: 12’ wide
Internal: 15’ wide
[landscape plan, L1.11]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Please add another wide vegetative screen wall here [elevations, A2.00]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
|
|
|
See Document Markup
The perimeter of all parking areas and associated access drives which abut public right-of ways shall be screened with on-site landscaping, earth berms, fencing, or a combination of both [landscape plans, L1.10]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
PMC 20.26.400 (1) requires that the 15 wide landscape strip along blank walls include a mixture of medium to large evergreen conifer and deciduous trees and shrubs. Please include trees on the landscape plan chosen from class II, II, or IV street tree list in the VMS. [landscape plans, L1.10 & L1.11]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
3.Please add soil cells to the 66 blank wall landscape area [landscape plans, L1.10 & L1.11]
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Review
|
Revisions Required
|
12/17/2022
|
12/21/2022
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Document Markup
The Engineering approval block is outdated, you can find the most up to date here: https://www.cityofpuyallup.org/DocumentCenter/View/6921/Section-10-Engineering-Services-Review-Process?bidId= [site plan, pg 2]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Include City of Puyallup Sewer and stormwater in the utilities/services list. [site plan, pg 2]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add this hatch to the legend. [site plan, pg 3]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
A connection to the SSMH is not desired by the City, tap the main with a sewer saddle per city standard 04.02.01[site plan, pg 4]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
The backflow devices will need to be placed downstream of the water meters. [site plan, pg 4]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add this linetype to the legend or revise accordingly. [site plan, pg 4]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide a scale for the vicinity map. [site plan, pg 2]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide the lot dimensions [site plan, pg 3]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
The geotech report is blurry, provide a new copy during the next submission. [drainage report, pg 12]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Update MR 4. The site discharges to Deer Creek which discharges to the Puyallup River. [Drainage report, pg 15]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide the following surfaces in a table format in square feet/acres for the west and east threshold discharge areas:
*Pollution Generating Hard Surfaces
*Effective impervious areas
[drainage plans, pg 29]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
The pre-developed land use basin (5.213 acres) and proposed land use basin (5.44 acres) do not match, revise accordingly. [drainage report, pg 38]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Where did this printout come from? It appears that the vault meets the flow control requirement on page 50, but this information is contradictive. [drainage report, pg 53]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Why are the basin sizes being altered between the existing and proposed conditions? [drainage plans, pg 29]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Why are the basin sizes being altered between the existing and proposed conditions? [drainage plans, pg 25]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Fill out and include Figure III-1.1: Runoff Treatment BMP Selection flow chart. [drainage report, pg 18]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide dimensions that prove whether there are two threshold discharge areas (TDA) for the site. Ecology defines a TDA as an area within a project site draining to a single natural discharge location or multiple natural discharge locations that combine within one-quarter mile downstream (as determined by the shortest flowpath) [drainage report, pg 23]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide figure I-3.5: Flow Chart for Determining Wetland Protection Level Requirements. [drainage report, pg 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide a preliminary WWHM calculation for the wetland protection as required by the flow chart to ensure they hydroperiod of the wetland is not altered . [drainage report, pg 19]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide the square footages of each parcel. [site plan, pg 3]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Depict/label the water mains in 15th St SE. [site plan, pg 3]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Easements AFN 8212150220 and 1084061 are historic and the city does not have access per Pierce County's Recorded Documents, provide a copy of these easements during the next submittal. [site plan, pg 3]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide dimensions between the underground detention system and the new building, and adjacent property lines. [site plan, pg 4]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide the total proposed impervious area in square feet. [site plan, pg 4]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Show AFN 20190090363 on this sheet. Does this easement restrict the placement of the storm vault in this area? [civils, pg 4]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Include the pervious/impervious areas in 15th St SE that is within the east basin as part of this project. [drainage plans, pg 29]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
What are these triangles representing? [civils, pg 4]
|
|
|
|
|
Fire Review
|
No Comments
|
12/17/2022
|
12/13/2022
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
|
|
|
|
|
Building Review
|
Revisions Required
|
12/17/2022
|
12/06/2022
|
|
|
|
|
|
BLTR - Add Submittal Item: Geotech - Soil
Additional Submittal Item: Provide a Geo-Tech report for soils with the building permit applications.
|
|
|
BLTR - Demolition
A separate demolition permit will be required for the demo of the structures currently on the site and will require documentation from the Puget Sound Clean Air agency at the time of submittal for the demo permit.
|
|
|
BLTR - EV - R-2
The R-2 apartments and Occupancy B are required to have the infrastructure in place for charging stations per IBC section 429 Washington State amendments and will need to be shown on the plans.
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
Building plans will need to be complete with all building, mechanical, plumbing, energy code items and accessibility requirements that apply to project.
The proposed Code Analysis (sheet G0.01) claims the building area been calculated on unlimited area buildings (section 507). Per 507.2.1 reduced open space the minimum reduced shall not be less then 40 feet with 3 conditions. Appears you meet the 3 conditions on sheet A1.10 but the site plan reflects 38 feet to the south property line adjacent to the Union Pacific Railroad. Provide code path how it can be reduced to 38 feet or revise site plan to reflect required 40 feet setback.
Two different construction types and occupancies are noted, application notes IIIB, S-1 or S-2 and B and the Site Plan (G0.01) notes VB, S-1, F-1 and B. Acknowledge this preliminary but upon submittal for permits all construction types and occupancy will need to match.
Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure are required in place for charging stations per IBC section 429 Washington State amendments for occupancy B square footage and will need to be shown on the plans. None are currently noted in parking calculations or on the site plan. **Note if building permit is applied for after July 1, 2023, the EV parking requirements change to require EV parking provided for all occupancies.
Plans will need to be per the applicable codes 2018 adopted February 1, 2021, for all permits. Unless submitted after July 1, 2023, to current state adopted code.
All electrical is permitted by the Washington State Department L & I.
Accessible parking and access to the public way will be required. For all accessible requirements the City adopted the 2018 IBC / WAC 51-50 and the ICC A117.1-2009 standard. Minimum one electric vehicle charging infrastructure is required to be accessible.
**Note if permit is applied after July 1, 2023, there are significate accessibility requirements changes in the code.
If VB construction the truss specs will also be required with the truss engineers’ stamps and a layout that matches the submitted plans at the time of submittal.
Please reach out to me if I can answer any other questions in relationship to Building code items for this project. No other Building items at this time.
|
|
|
|
