Review Type
Outcome
Est. Completion Date
Completed
Engineering Civil Review
Approved
10/26/2023
10/10/2023
Reviewer:
Corrections:
Correction 1:
See Document Markup
Comments:
See Civil application PRCCP20230970 for review comments associated with the stormwater report. Incorporate those comments into the CFG design as appropriate.
[Storm Report; Pg 1 of 164]
Correction 2:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout to protect existing storm conveyance system.
[Plans C-2; Pg 2 of 25]
Correction 3:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add: "Regulated Floodplain per".
[CSWPPP; Pg 14 of 70]
Correction 4:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per prior comment, provide sizing calculations for the proposed interceptor swale(s). (Reference CFG Plans, Detail 5/C7).
[CSWPPP; Pg 15 of 70]
Correction 5:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Replace w City Std Detail 02.03.02.
[CSWPPP; Pg 62 of 70]
Correction 6:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Replace w City Std Detail 05.02.01.
[CSWPPP; Pg 64 of 70]
Correction 7:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-TESC Plan label?
[Plans C-2; Pg 2 of 28]
Correction 8:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide geotextile impermeable liner properties per Ecology Table V-1.6. Also indicate the line shall be ultraviolet (UV) light resistant.
[Plans C-16; Pg 16 of 28]
Correction 9:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide geotextile impermeable liner properties per Ecology Table V-1.6. Also indicate the line shall be ultraviolet (UV) light resistant.
[Plans C-22; Pg 22 of 28]
Correction 10:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide geotextile impermeable liner properties per Ecology Table V-1.6. Also indicate the line shall be ultraviolet (UV) light resistant.
[Plans C-28; Pg 28 of 28]
Correction 11:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Remove Sewer Info from CFG application. (Typ)
[Plans C-1; Pg 1 of 28]
Correction 12:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add Note: Maintain min. 5ft setback between toe of fill slope and critical area buffer.
[Plans C-2; Pg 2 of 28]
Correction 13:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Remove Proposed Sewer Info from CFG application.
[Plans C-3; Pg 3 of 28]
Correction 14:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify- Shts C17-C22?
[Plans C-3; Pg 3 of 28]
Correction 15:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify- Grading shown beyond the silt fence. (5 Plcs)
[Plans C-3; Pg 3 of 28]
Correction 16:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify.
[Plans C-3; Pg 3 of 28]
Correction 17:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per prior comment, provide x-section across property line. Clarify how surface water is not ponding (offsite flows being dammed) along the property line as a result of the filling operations. (Typical) (May need to provide a storm conveyance system to collect ponded water)
[Plans C-3; Pg 3 of 28]
Correction 18:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Remove Proposed Sewer Info from CFG application.
[Plans C-4; Pg 4 of 28]
Correction 19:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Remove Proposed Sewer Info from CFG application.
[Plans C-4; Pg 4 of 28]
Correction 20:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Remove Proposed Sewer Info from CFG application.
[Plans C-5; Pg 5 of 28]
Correction 21:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Remove Proposed Sewer Info from CFG application.
[Plans C-6; Pg 6 of 28]
Correction 22:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per prior comment-Add City Standard General Notes per CS Section 2.4.
[Plans C-7; Pg 7 of 28]
Correction 23:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add Note: Maintain min. 5ft setback between toe of fill slope and critical area buffer.
[Plans C-9; Pg 9 of 28]
Correction 24:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add Note: Maintain min. 5ft setback between toe of fill slope and critical area buffer.
[Plans C-9; Pg 9 of 28]
Correction 25:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per prior comment-Provide H/V scale per City Stds. The consistency between the horizontal scale and the vertical scale shall be on a ratio of 10 to 1 (i.e., 1" = 20' horizontal; 1" = 2' vertical).
[Plans C-9; Pg 9 of 28]
Correction 26:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per prior comment-Provide H/V scale per City Stds. The consistency between the horizontal scale and the vertical scale shall be on a ratio of 10 to 1 (i.e., 1" = 20' horizontal; 1" = 2' vertical).
[Plans C-10; Pg 10 of 28]
Correction 27:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per prior comment-Revise to "minimum 30mil ultraviolet (UV) light resistant impermeable geomembrane liner".
[Plans C-12; Pg 12 of 28]
Correction 28:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per prior comment-Provide buoyancy calculations prior to CFG approval and include in the project storm report. Per Krazan Report, high groundwater at MW1 and MW2 is El. 69.84 and 70.63, respectively.
[Plans C-12; Pg 12 of 28]
Correction 29:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per prior comment-Provide geotextile impermeable liner properties per Ecology Table V-1.6. Also indicate the line shall be ultraviolet (UV) light resistant.
[Plans C-16; Pg 16 of 28]
Correction 30:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per tel-con 9-26-23, revise WWHM calculations in the CSWWP, Appendix C, or tank sizing as appropriate.
[Plans C-19; Pg 19 of 28]
Correction 31:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per prior comment-Provide geotextile impermeable liner properties per Ecology Table V-1.6. Also indicate the line shall be ultraviolet (UV) light resistant.
[Plans C-22; Pg 22 of 28]
Correction 32:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per prior comment-Revise to "minimum 30mil ultraviolet (UV) light resistant impermeable geomembrane liner".
[Plans C-24; Pg 24 of 28]
Correction 33:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per prior comment-Provide buoyancy calculations prior to CFG approval and include in the project storm report. Per Krazan Report, high groundwater at MW1 and MW2 is El. 69.84 and 70.63, respectively.
[Plans C-24; Pg 24 of 28]
Correction 34:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per tel-con 9-26-23, revise WWHM calculations in the CSWWP, Appendix C, or tank sizing as appropriate.
[Plans C-24; Pg 24 of 28]
Correction 35:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per tel-con 9-26-23, revise WWHM calculations in the CSWWP, Appendix C, or tank sizing as appropriate.
[Plans C-25; Pg 25 of 28]
Correction 36:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide geotextile impermeable liner properties per Ecology Table V-1.6. Also indicate the line shall be ultraviolet (UV) light resistant.
[Plans C-28; Pg 28 of 28]
Correction 37:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per prior comment-Provide geotextile impermeable liner properties per Ecology Table V-1.6. Also indicate the line shall be ultraviolet (UV) light resistant.
[Plans C-28; Pg 28 of 28]
Correction 38:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add back: "and Dust Control".
[CSWPPP; Pg 6 of 210]
Correction 39:
See Document Markup
Comments:
BMPs C151, C153, C154?
[CSWPPP; Pg 7 of 210]
Correction 40:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per tel-con 9-26-23, revise WWHM calculations or tank sizing as appropriate.
[CSWPPP; Pg 24 of 210]
Correction 41:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per prior comment-Revise to "minimum 30mil ultraviolet (UV) light resistant impermeable geomembrane liner".
[Plans C-18; Pg 18 of 28]
Correction 42:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per prior comment-Provide buoyancy calculations prior to CFG approval and include in the project storm report. Per Krazan Report, high groundwater at MW1 and MW2 is El. 69.84 and 70.63, respectively.
[Plans C-18; Pg 18 of 28]
Correction 43:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per tel-con 9-26-23, revise WWHM calculations in the CSWWP, Appendix C, or tank sizing as appropriate.
[Plans C-18; Pg 18 of 28]
Correction 44:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Make Corrections Noted.
[Cost Estimate]
Public Works Water Review
VOID
10/26/2023
10/06/2023
Reviewer:
Public Works Streets Review
VOID
10/26/2023
10/06/2023
Reviewer:
Public Works Collection Review
VOID
10/26/2023
10/06/2023
Reviewer:
Planning Review
VOID
10/26/2023
10/06/2023
Reviewer:
Engineering Traffic Review
VOID
10/26/2023
10/06/2023
Reviewer:
Fire Review
Approved
10/26/2023
10/06/2023
Reviewer:
Engineering Civil Review
Failed
09/26/2023
09/27/2023
Reviewer:
Corrections:
Correction 1:
See Document Markup
Comments:
See Civil application PRCCP20230970 for review comments associated with the stormwater report. Incorporate those comments into the CFG design as appropriate.
[Storm Report; Pg 1 of 164]
Correction 2:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout to protect existing storm conveyance system.
[Plans C-2; Pg 2 of 25]
Correction 3:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Page references are still incorrect.
[CSWPPP; Pg 3 of 70]
Correction 4:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-as noted previously, the area enclosed by silt fence is 10+ acres and the draft storm report indicates roughly 460,000sf of disturbance.
[CSWPPP; Pg 4 of 70]
Correction 5:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-C140 is dust control. BMPs 200, 233, C241, and Baker Tank(s)?
[CSWPPP; Pg 5 of 70]
Correction 6:
See Document Markup
Comments:
BMP C140?
[CSWPPP; Pg 5 of 70]
Correction 7:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add: "Construct sediment control BMPs as one of the first steps of grading. These BMPs shall be functional before other land disturbing activities take place".
[CSWPPP; Pg 5 of 70]
Correction 8:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add: "the existing".
[CSWPPP; Pg 5 of 70]
Correction 9:
See Document Markup
Comments:
BMP C220?
[CSWPPP; Pg 6 of 70]
Correction 10:
See Document Markup
Comments:
BMP C209?
[CSWPPP; Pg 6 of 70]
Correction 11:
See Document Markup
Comments:
BMPs C151, C153, C154?
[CSWPPP; Pg 6 of 70]
Correction 12:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Please add the control descriptions noted on Pg 11 of 70.
[CSWPPP; Pg 6 of 70]
Correction 13:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Please add: "-Handle highly turbid or contaminated dewatering water separately from stormwater. -Discharge foundation, vault, and trench dewatering water which has characteristics similar to stormwater into a controlled conveyance system before discharge to a sediment trap or sediment pond. Clean dewatering water will not be routed through stormwater sediment ponds."
[CSWPPP; Pg 6 of 70]
Correction 14:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Please add: "All temporary and permanent Erosion and Sediment Control (ESC) BMPs shall be maintained and repaired as needed to ensure continued performance of their intended function. Visual monitoring of all BMPs installed at the site will be conducted at least once every calendar week and within 24 hours of any stormwater or non-stormwater discharge from the site. If the site becomes inactive and is temporarily stabilized, the inspection frequency may be reduced to once every calendar month."
[CSWPPP; Pg 6 of 70]
Correction 15:
See Document Markup
Comments:
BMPs C150, C160?
[CSWPPP; Pg 6 of 70]
Correction 16:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Please add the following control descriptions to Element 9 on Pg 6 of 70.
[CSWPPP; Pg 11 of 70]
Correction 17:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add: "Regulated Floodplain per".
[CSWPPP; Pg 14 of 70]
Correction 18:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per prior comment, provide sizing calculations for the proposed interceptor swale(s). (Reference CFG Plans, Detail 5/C7).
[CSWPPP; Pg 15 of 70]
Correction 19:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Replace w City Std Detail 02.03.02.
[CSWPPP; Pg 62 of 70]
Correction 20:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Replace w City Std Detail 05.02.01.
[CSWPPP; Pg 64 of 70]
Correction 21:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-per previous comment. This recording number does not exist on the Auditor's website.
[Plans C-1; Pg 1 of 28]
Correction 22:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add: "Caution: Existing12in storm main".
[Plans C-1; Pg 1 of 28]
Correction 23:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout to protect existing infrastructure (sewer and signal).
[Plans C-1; Pg 1 of 28]
Correction 24:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide DRAFT Cost Estimate on City form for all work associated with the CFG permit only (form available on the City's Development Engineering website).
[Plans C-1; Pg 1 of 28]
Correction 25:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-TESC Plan label?
[Plans C-2; Pg 2 of 28]
Correction 26:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-should the cross-section arrows be pointing north? See Section 5/C10.
[Plans C-2; Pg 2 of 28]
Correction 27:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per prior comment-Identify the critical area buffer setback(s). Callout construction fencing along the setback line.
[Plans C-2; Pg 2 of 28]
Correction 28:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per prior comment-Provide minimum 5-ft setback between toe of fill slope and any critical area buffer (CS 502.6).
[Plans C-2; Pg 2 of 28]
Correction 29:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-Detail reference.
[Plans C-2; Pg 2 of 28]
Correction 30:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add: "Regulated Floodplain per".
[Plans C-2; Pg 2 of 28]
Correction 31:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Fill placement within the regulated floodplain requires equivalent compensatory storage. Either protect the floodplain area from filling activity; or quantify the amount of compensatory storage required (provide calculations), and indicate the location of the compensatory storage area. Compensatory storage shall be at equivalent elevation(s) per FEMA/City regulations and the area protected in perpetuity.
[Plans C-2; Pg 2 of 28]
Correction 32:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Identify Parcel No.
[Plans C-2; Pg 2 of 28]
Correction 33:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout existing storm facility.
[Plans C-2; Pg 2 of 28]
Correction 34:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify leader location.
[Plans C-2; Pg 2 of 28]
Correction 35:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide x-section across property line. Clarify how surface water is not ponding along the property line as a result of the filling operations. (Typical) (May need to provide a storm conveyance system to collect ponded water)
[Plans C-3; Pg 3 of 28]
Correction 36:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Remove grading contour from adjacent property.
[Plans C-3; Pg 3 of 28]
Correction 37:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Remove grading contour from adjacent property.
[Plans C-3; Pg 3 of 28]
Correction 38:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add: "Typical".
[Plans C-3; Pg 3 of 28]
Correction 39:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Clearly show and callout the property lines (Typ).
[Plans C-3; Pg 3 of 25]
Correction 40:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Readability.
[Plans C-2; Pg 2 of 25]
Correction 41:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify- Shts C17-C22.
[Plans C-3; Pg 3 of 28]
Correction 42:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show existing sewer main and structures. Callout to protect.
[Plans C-4; Pg 4 of 28]
Correction 43:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per prior comment-Identify the critical area buffer setback(s). Callout construction fencing along the setback line.
[Plans C-4; Pg 4 of 28]
Correction 44:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify leader location.
[Plans C-4; Pg 4 of 28]
Correction 45:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-4/C7?
[Plans C-4; Pg 4 of 28]
Correction 46:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify leader location.
[Plans C-4; Pg 4 of 28]
Correction 47:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout depth of trench and/or top of grade board.
[Plans C-4; Pg 4 of 28]
Correction 48:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Clarify-using both a dispersion pad and dispersion trench? For the pad, callout size of quarry spalls, depth of spalls/pad, and pad dimensions.
[Plans C-4; Pg 4 of 28]
Correction 49:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Fill placement within the regulated floodplain requires equivalent compensatory storage. Either protect the floodplain area from filling activity; or quantify the amount of compensatory storage required (provide calculations), and indicate the location of the compensatory storage area. Compensatory storage shall be at equivalent elevation(s) per FEMA/City regulations and the area protected in perpetuity.
[Plans C-4; Pg 4 of 28]
Correction 50:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per prior comment-Provide minimum 5-ft setback between toe of fill slope and any critical area buffer (CS 502.6).
[Plans C-4; Pg 4 of 28]
Correction 51:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-pad location.
[Plans C-4; Pg 4 of 28]
Correction 52:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout to protect existing watermain.
[Plans C-4; Pg 4 of 28]
Correction 53:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout to protect existing storm system.
[Plans C-5; Pg 5 of 28]
Correction 54:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout construction entrance.
[Plans C-5; Pg 5 of 28]
Correction 55:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify- Shts C23-C28.
[Plans C-5; Pg 5 of 28]
Correction 56:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per prior comment-Identify the critical area buffer setback(s). Callout construction fencing along the setback line.
[Plans C-5; Pg 5 of 28]
Correction 57:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per prior comment-Provide minimum 5-ft setback between toe of fill slope and any critical area buffer (CS 502.6).
[Plans C-5; Pg 5 of 28]
Correction 58:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout to protect existing storm outfall.
[Plans C-5; Pg 5 of 28]
Correction 59:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Clarify.
[Plans C-5; Pg 5 of 28]
Correction 60:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify leader location.
[Plans C-6; Pg 6 of 28]
Correction 61:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify- Shts C23-C28.
[Plans C-6; Pg 6 of 28]
Correction 62:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout to protect existing storm system.
[Plans C-6; Pg 6 of 28]
Correction 63:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per prior comment, provide sizing calculations for the proposed interceptor swale(s).
[Plans; Sht 7 of 28]
Correction 64:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Please use Ecology's dispersion trench detail, Figure V-1.8.
[Plans; Sht 7 of 28]
Correction 65:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per prior comment-Add City Standard General Notes per CS Section 2.4.
[Plans C-7; Pg 7 of 28]
Correction 66:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide offset amount.
[Plans C-9; Pg 9 of 28]
Correction 67:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show and callout existing roadside stream/ditch.
[Plans C-9; Pg 9 of 28]
Correction 68:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide H/V scale per City Stds. The consistency between the horizontal scale and the vertical scale shall be on a ratio of 10 to 1 (i.e., 1" = 20' horizontal; 1" = 2' vertical).
[Plans C-9; Pg 9 of 28]
Correction 69:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide 'Existing Grade' and 'Proposed Grade' elevations at 50ft intervals.
[Plans C-9; Pg 9 of 28]
Correction 70:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide offset amount.
[Plans C-9; Pg 9 of 28]
Correction 71:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide H/V scale per City Stds. The consistency between the horizontal scale and the vertical scale shall be on a ratio of 10 to 1 (i.e., 1" = 20' horizontal; 1" = 2' vertical).
[Plans C-10; Pg 10 of 28]
Correction 72:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide 'Existing Grade' and 'Proposed Grade' elevations at 50ft intervals.
[Plans C-10; Pg 10 of 28]
Correction 73:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide offset amount.
[Plans C-10; Pg 10 of 28]
Correction 74:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Confirm-this appears to be the existing storm pond...is the x-section cut on Sht C2 baclwards?
[Plans C-10; Pg 10 of 28]
Correction 75:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide offset amount.
[Plans C-10; Pg 10 of 28]
Correction 76:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide offset amount.
[Plans C-10; Pg 10 of 28]
Correction 77:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Confirm module layout based on the subasin analysis (stage-storage requirements) per Storm Report comments, Pg 117 of 164.
[Plans C-11; Pg 11 of 28]
Correction 78:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Revise to "minimum 30mil ultraviolet (UV) light resistant impermeable geomembrane liner".
[Plans C-12; Pg 12 of 28]
Correction 79:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per civil review comment: Confirm stage-storage requirements with subasin analysis per Storm Report comments, Pg 117 of 164.
[Plans C-12; Pg 12 of 28]
Correction 80:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per civil review comment: Ensure available storage accounts for 6in of sediment storage per Ecology's requirements.
[Plans C-12; Pg 12 of 28]
Correction 81:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide buoyancy calculations prior to CFG approval and include in the project storm report.
[Plans C-12; Pg 12 of 28]
Correction 82:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per civil review comment: Confirm stage-storage requirements with subasin analysis per Storm Report comments, Pg 117 of 164.
[Plans C-13; Pg 13 of 28]
Correction 83:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per civil review comment: Confirm stage-storage requirements with subasin analysis per Storm Report comments, Pg 117 of 164.
[Plans C-13; Pg 13 of 28]
Correction 84:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per civil review comment: Ensure available storage accounts for 6in of sediment storage per Ecology's requirements.
[Plans C-13; Pg 13 of 28]
Correction 85:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide geotextile impermeable liner properties per Ecology Table V-1.6. Also indicate the line shall be ultraviolet (UV) light resistant.
[Plans C-16; Pg 16 of 28]
Correction 86:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Confirm module layout based on the subasin analysis (stage-storage requirements) per Storm Report comments, Pg 117 of 164.
[Plans C-17; Pg 17 of 28]
Correction 87:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Revise to "minimum 30mil ultraviolet (UV) light resistant impermeable geomembrane liner".
[Plans C-18; Pg 18 of 28]
Correction 88:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per civil review comment: Confirm stage-storage requirements with subasin analysis per Storm Report comments, Pg 117 of 164.
[Plans C-18; Pg 18 of 28]
Correction 89:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per civil review comment: Ensure available storage accounts for 6in of sediment storage per Ecology's requirements.
[Plans C-18; Pg 18 of 28]
Correction 90:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide buoyancy calculations prior to CFG approval and include in the project storm report.
[Plans C-18; Pg 18 of 28]
Correction 91:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per civil review comment: Confirm stage-storage requirements with subasin analysis per Storm Report comments, Pg 117 of 164.
[Plans C-19; Pg 19 of 28]
Correction 92:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per civil review comment: Confirm stage-storage requirements with subasin analysis per Storm Report comments, Pg 117 of 164.
[Plans C-19; Pg 19 of 28]
Correction 93:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per civil review comment: Ensure available storage accounts for 6in of sediment storage per Ecology's requirements.
[Plans C-19; Pg 19 of 28]
Correction 94:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide geotextile impermeable liner properties per Ecology Table V-1.6. Also indicate the line shall be ultraviolet (UV) light resistant.
[Plans C-22; Pg 22 of 28]
Correction 95:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Confirm module layout based on the subasin analysis (stage-storage requirements) per Storm Report comments, Pg 117 of 164.
[Plans C-23; Pg 23 of 28]
Correction 96:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Revise to "minimum 30mil ultraviolet (UV) light resistant impermeable geomembrane liner".
[Plans C-24; Pg 24 of 28]
Correction 97:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per civil review comment: Confirm stage-storage requirements with subasin analysis per Storm Report comments, Pg 117 of 164.
[Plans C-24; Pg 24 of 28]
Correction 98:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per civil review comment: Ensure available storage accounts for 6in of sediment storage per Ecology's requirements.
[Plans C-24; Pg 24 of 28]
Correction 99:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide buoyancy calculations prior to CFG approval and include in the project storm report.
[Plans C-24; Pg 24 of 28]
Correction 100:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per civil review comment: Confirm stage-storage requirements with subasin analysis per Storm Report comments, Pg 117 of 164.
[Plans C-25; Pg 25 of 28]
Correction 101:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per civil review comment: Confirm stage-storage requirements with subasin analysis per Storm Report comments, Pg 117 of 164.
[Plans C-25; Pg 25 of 28]
Correction 102:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per civil review comment: Ensure available storage accounts for 6in of sediment storage per Ecology's requirements.
[Plans C-25; Pg 25 of 28]
Correction 103:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide geotextile impermeable liner properties per Ecology Table V-1.6. Also indicate the line shall be ultraviolet (UV) light resistant.
[Plans C-28; Pg 28 of 28]
Correction 104:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Remove Sewer Info from CFG application. (Typ)
[Plans C-1; Pg 1 of 28]
Correction 105:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-TESC Plan label?
[Plans C-2; Pg 2 of 28]
Correction 106:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add Note: Maintain min. 5ft setback between toe of fill slope and critical area buffer.
[Plans C-2; Pg 2 of 28]
Correction 107:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Remove Proposed Sewer Info from CFG application.
[Plans C-3; Pg 3 of 28]
Correction 108:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify- Shts C17-C22?
[Plans C-3; Pg 3 of 28]
Correction 109:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify- Grading shown beyond the silt fence. (5 Plcs)
[Plans C-3; Pg 3 of 28]
Correction 110:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify.
[Plans C-3; Pg 3 of 28]
Correction 111:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per prior comment, provide x-section across property line. Clarify how surface water is not ponding (offsite flows being dammed) along the property line as a result of the filling operations. (Typical) (May need to provide a storm conveyance system to collect ponded water)
[Plans C-3; Pg 3 of 28]
Correction 112:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Remove Proposed Sewer Info from CFG application.
[Plans C-4; Pg 4 of 28]
Correction 113:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Remove Proposed Sewer Info from CFG application.
[Plans C-4; Pg 4 of 28]
Correction 114:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Remove Proposed Sewer Info from CFG application.
[Plans C-5; Pg 5 of 28]
Correction 115:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Remove Proposed Sewer Info from CFG application.
[Plans C-6; Pg 6 of 28]
Correction 116:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per prior comment-Add City Standard General Notes per CS Section 2.4.
[Plans C-7; Pg 7 of 28]
Correction 117:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add Note: Maintain min. 5ft setback between toe of fill slope and critical area buffer.
[Plans C-9; Pg 9 of 28]
Correction 118:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add Note: Maintain min. 5ft setback between toe of fill slope and critical area buffer.
[Plans C-9; Pg 9 of 28]
Correction 119:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per prior comment-Provide H/V scale per City Stds. The consistency between the horizontal scale and the vertical scale shall be on a ratio of 10 to 1 (i.e., 1" = 20' horizontal; 1" = 2' vertical).
[Plans C-9; Pg 9 of 28]
Correction 120:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per prior comment-Provide H/V scale per City Stds. The consistency between the horizontal scale and the vertical scale shall be on a ratio of 10 to 1 (i.e., 1" = 20' horizontal; 1" = 2' vertical).
[Plans C-10; Pg 10 of 28]
Correction 121:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per prior comment-Revise to "minimum 30mil ultraviolet (UV) light resistant impermeable geomembrane liner".
[Plans C-12; Pg 12 of 28]
Correction 122:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per prior comment-Provide buoyancy calculations prior to CFG approval and include in the project storm report. Per Krazan Report, high groundwater at MW1 and MW2 is El. 69.84 and 70.63, respectively.
[Plans C-12; Pg 12 of 28]
Correction 123:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide geotextile impermeable liner properties per Ecology Table V-1.6. Also indicate the line shall be ultraviolet (UV) light resistant.
[Plans C-16; Pg 16 of 28]
Correction 124:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per prior comment-Provide geotextile impermeable liner properties per Ecology Table V-1.6. Also indicate the line shall be ultraviolet (UV) light resistant.
[Plans C-16; Pg 16 of 28]
Correction 125:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per tel-con 9-26-23, revise WWHM calculations in the CSWWP, Appendix C, or tank sizing as appropriate.
[Plans C-19; Pg 19 of 28]
Correction 126:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide geotextile impermeable liner properties per Ecology Table V-1.6. Also indicate the line shall be ultraviolet (UV) light resistant.
[Plans C-22; Pg 22 of 28]
Correction 127:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per prior comment-Provide geotextile impermeable liner properties per Ecology Table V-1.6. Also indicate the line shall be ultraviolet (UV) light resistant.
[Plans C-22; Pg 22 of 28]
Correction 128:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per prior comment-Revise to "minimum 30mil ultraviolet (UV) light resistant impermeable geomembrane liner".
[Plans C-24; Pg 24 of 28]
Correction 129:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per prior comment-Provide buoyancy calculations prior to CFG approval and include in the project storm report. Per Krazan Report, high groundwater at MW1 and MW2 is El. 69.84 and 70.63, respectively.
[Plans C-24; Pg 24 of 28]
Correction 130:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per tel-con 9-26-23, revise WWHM calculations in the CSWWP, Appendix C, or tank sizing as appropriate.
[Plans C-24; Pg 24 of 28]
Correction 131:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per tel-con 9-26-23, revise WWHM calculations in the CSWWP, Appendix C, or tank sizing as appropriate.
[Plans C-25; Pg 25 of 28]
Correction 132:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide geotextile impermeable liner properties per Ecology Table V-1.6. Also indicate the line shall be ultraviolet (UV) light resistant.
[Plans C-28; Pg 28 of 28]
Correction 133:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per prior comment-Provide geotextile impermeable liner properties per Ecology Table V-1.6. Also indicate the line shall be ultraviolet (UV) light resistant.
[Plans C-28; Pg 28 of 28]
Correction 134:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add back: "and Dust Control".
[CSWPPP; Pg 6 of 210]
Correction 135:
See Document Markup
Comments:
BMPs C151, C153, C154?
[CSWPPP; Pg 7 of 210]
Correction 136:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per tel-con 9-26-23, revise WWHM calculations or tank sizing as appropriate.
[CSWPPP; Pg 24 of 210]
Correction 137:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per prior comment-Revise to "minimum 30mil ultraviolet (UV) light resistant impermeable geomembrane liner".
[Plans C-18; Pg 18 of 28]
Correction 138:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per prior comment-Provide buoyancy calculations prior to CFG approval and include in the project storm report. Per Krazan Report, high groundwater at MW1 and MW2 is El. 69.84 and 70.63, respectively.
[Plans C-18; Pg 18 of 28]
Correction 139:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per tel-con 9-26-23, revise WWHM calculations in the CSWWP, Appendix C, or tank sizing as appropriate.
[Plans C-18; Pg 18 of 28]
Correction 140:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Make Corrections Noted.
[Cost Estimate]
Public Works Water Review
Approved
09/26/2023
09/26/2023
Reviewer:
Engineering Traffic Review
Approved
09/26/2023
09/18/2023
Reviewer:
Public Works Streets Review
Approved
09/26/2023
09/12/2023
Reviewer:
Fire Review
Approved
09/26/2023
09/12/2023
Reviewer:
Planning Review
Approved
09/26/2023
09/12/2023
Reviewer:
Corrections:
Correction 1:
Miscellaneous Planning Correction
Comments:
Modify site grading plans to address all comments from Engineering regarding critical area buffer preservation and protection. Limits of clearing shall be consistent with all buffer areas and critical area reports - buffer areas cannot be graded under this permit. Please delineate and use protective fencing. Also address the delineation of any existing 100 year floodplain (also commented on by Engineering). [UPDATED COMMENT 08/14/23: Please call out buffer width dimension and OHWM for Pioneer stream and use line type to delineate protective fencing at the outer edge. Its still not clear where the stream OHWM is located and how the limits of clearing are being established to meet protective buffer area. Please include a high vis construction fencing detail to protect critical areas.
Public Works Collection Review
Approved
09/26/2023
09/11/2023
Reviewer:
Engineering Civil Review
Failed
08/21/2023
08/15/2023
Reviewer:
Corrections:
Correction 1:
See Document Markup
Comments:
See Civil application PRCCP20230970 for review comments associated with the stormwater report. Incorporate those comments into the CFG design as appropriate.
[Storm Report; Pg 1 of 164]
Correction 2:
See Document Markup
Comments:
1st Review
PRGR20230972
July 2023
Correction 3:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Revise the CSWPPP to provide the project-specific information outlined in Ecology's SWPPP template.
[CSWPPP; Pg 1 of 14]
Correction 4:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Revise accordingly.
[CSWPPP; Pg 3 of 14]
Correction 5:
See Document Markup
Comments:
In an appendix, include Ecology's BMP descriptions and details being used on the site as applicable:
BMPs C102 // C103 // C105 // C106 // C107 // C120 // C121 // C123 // C140 // C150 // C151 // C152 // C153 // C154 // C160 // C200 // C201 // C207 // C208 // C209 // C220 // C233 // C235 // C241 // C251.
[CSWPPP; Pg 3 of 14]
Correction 6:
See Document Markup
Comments:
See Ecology, Section II-2.4 for additional items to be included in the CSWPPP:
Discuss Critical Areas // Discuss Onsite Soils (soils map and descriptions) // Include a Vicinity Map.
[CSWPPP; Pg 3 of 14]
Correction 7:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Include a sample CSWPPP Site Inpection Form.
[CSWPPP; Pg 3 of 14]
Correction 8:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Include the following City Standard Details in the CSWPPP:
02.03.02 // 05.01.01 // 05.02.01.
[CSWPPP; Pg 3 of 14]
Correction 9:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-...4054? ...4053 is listed twice.
[CSWPPP; Pg 4 of 14]
Correction 10:
See Document Markup
Comments:
For each element, list the associated BMP number(s) from the Ecology Manual for the chosen BMP.
[CSWPPP; Pg 4 of 14]
Correction 11:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Revise-the property is 11+ acres, and the area enclosed by silt fence on Sht C-2 is 10+ acres.
[CSWPPP; Pg 4 of 14]
Correction 12:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Address protecting the existing storm facility serving the properties to the south as well as the regulated stream that runs through it.
[CSWPPP; Pg 4 of 14]
Correction 13:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Describe what is required if sediment is tracked off-site onto the public ROW.
[CSWPPP; Pg 4 of 14]
Correction 14:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide commentary that the permanent flow control systems must be constructed and functioning prior to constructing onsite hard surfaces.
[CSWPPP; Pg 4 of 14]
Correction 15:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Clarify-Baker Tanks are called out on Sht C-2 (pg 8 of 14) in this SWPPP. Are they to be used in conjunction with the sediment pond? As a fail-safe?
[CSWPPP; Pg 4 of 14]
Correction 16:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add that this element must be completed prior to mass grading operations.
[CSWPPP; Pg 4 of 14]
Correction 17:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Describe how to respond if sediment controls are ineffective and turbid water is observed discharging from the site.
[CSWPPP; Pg 4 of 14]
Correction 18:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide additional description...(i.e. temporary and permanent seeding, mulching, erosion control fabrics, etc.).
[CSWPPP; Pg 5 of 14]
Correction 19:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add:
-Stabilize soils at the end of the shift before a holiday or weekend if needed based on the weather forecast.
-Stabilize soil stockpiles from erosion, protect with sediment trapping measures, and where possible locate stockpiles away from drainage facilities (waterways, storm inlets, channels, etc.)
[CSWPPP; Pg 5 of 14]
Correction 20:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Address dust control also.
[CSWPPP; Pg 5 of 14]
Correction 21:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add:
-Divert offsite surface water (run-on) away from slopes and disturbed areas with interceptor dikes, swales, and/or pipes. Offsite surface water should be managed separately from surface water generated onsite.
[CSWPPP; Pg 5 of 14]
Correction 22:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add:
-Inlet protection devices will be cleaned (or removed and replaced), when sediment has filled the device by one third (1/3) or as specified by the manufacturer.
-Inlets will be inspected weekly at a minimum and daily during storm events.
[CSWPPP; Pg 5 of 14]
Correction 23:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add:
-Provide stabilization, including armoring material (if approved), adequate to prevent erosion of outlets, adjacent stream banks, slopes, and downstream reaches, at the outlets of all conveyance systems.
[CSWPPP; Pg 5 of 14]
Correction 24:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Revise to read..."regulations and this CSWPPP".
[CSWPPP; Pg 5 of 14]
Correction 25:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Discuss items outlined in Ecology's CSWPPP template (waste materials, equipment maintenance and fueling activities, concrete truck washout, etc.).
[CSWPPP; Pg 5 of 14]
Correction 26:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Discuss dewatering items outlined in Ecology's CSWPPP template under Element 10.
[CSWPPP; Pg 5 of 14]
Correction 27:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add additional description as outlined in Ecology's CSWPPP template under Element 11.
[CSWPPP; Pg 5 of 14]
Correction 28:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add additional description as outlined in Ecology's CSWPPP template under Element 12.
[CSWPPP; Pg 5 of 14]
Correction 29:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Based on the current civil design strategy, individual LID elements are not being incorporated (project is attempting to meet the LID Performance Standard). However, this must be confirmed prior to final approval of the civil design.
[CSWPPP; Pg 6 of 14]
Correction 30:
See Document Markup
Comments:
List the Pollution Prevention Team, their title, and contact info for the project. For persons yet to be determined, use "TBD".
[CSWPPP; Pg 6 of 14]
Correction 31:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide Monitoring and Sampling criteria...for reference, see Ecology's CSWPPP template.
[CSWPPP; Pg 6 of 14]
Correction 32:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Discuss Reporting and Record Keeping criteria...for reference, see Ecology's CSWPPP template.
[CSWPPP; Pg 6 of 14]
Correction 33:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Include the items noted in the Appendix/Glossary of Ecology's CSWPPP template as applicable to the project.
[CSWPPP; Pg 6 of 14]
Correction 34:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify location of inlet protection callouts. Inlet Protection shall be provided at inlets along the project frontage (Typ).
[CSWPPP; Pg 8 of 14]
Correction 35:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-2/C2?
[CSWPPP; Pg 8 of 14]
Correction 36:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Clarify-Is this for filtration? TESC flow control? Both? A sediment pond is called out on the CFG plans and sediment pond calculations are provided in this document, but no sed-pond is shown here.
[CSWPPP; Pg 8 of 14]
Correction 37:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout to protect existing watermain.
[CSWPPP; Pg 8 of 14]
Correction 38:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout to protect existing infrastructure (sewer and signal).
[CSWPPP; Pg 8 of 14]
Correction 39:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coordinate this sheet with the TESC Plan in the CFG set.
[CSWPPP; Pg 8 of 14]
Correction 40:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify callout...don't believe there is an inlet at this location.
[CSWPPP; Pg 8 of 14]
Correction 41:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-1/C3?
[CSWPPP; Pg 8 of 14]
Correction 42:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Sediment pond calculations are provided, but no pond is shown. If a sediment pond is to be used, provide the following information:
Pond Contours // Top of Berm Elev. // Bottom Elev // Bottom Area // Surface Area Req'd // Surface Area Provided // Location of the TESC Riser // Size of Riser // Riser Orifice Size // Inlets and Outlets to Facility including protection // Baffle location and dimensions.
[CSWPPP; Pg 8 of 14]
Correction 43:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Clarify-This is an existing storm facility serving properties to the south. In addition, the storm facility is currently being regulated as a critical area due to the offsite stream that has breached the pond berm and runs through the facility. Provide more information on how this storm facility will continue to function and the stream protected during the CFG operations.
[CSWPPP; Pg 8 of 14]
Correction 44:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Clarify-Baker Tanks are discharging to the existing flow control structure serving properties to the south. Not sure how that works.
[CSWPPP; Pg 8 of 14]
Correction 45:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout to protect existing storm drain associated with the storm facility serving properties to the south.
[CSWPPP; Pg 8 of 14]
Correction 46:
See Document Markup
Comments:
How is this outlet protected during the CFG operations?
[CSWPPP; Pg 8 of 14]
Correction 47:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide Construction Sequence per CS 501.6.
[CSWPPP; Pg 8 of 14]
Correction 48:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Include the City's 'Grading, Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan Notes' per CS Section 505.
[CSWPPP; Pg 8 of 14]
Correction 49:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide filter sock detail also.
[Plans C-2; Pg 2 of 25]
Correction 50:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout to preserve and protect existing drainage ditch (a regulated stream) during the CFG operations.
[Plans C-2; Pg 2 of 25]
Correction 51:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Delineate and callout the floodplain in accordance with the LOMR dated September 8, 2022. Any work within the designated floodplain shall comply with the requirements of PMC 21.07, particularly the compensatory storage and habitat assessment provisions.
[CSWPPP; Pg 8 of 14]
Correction 52:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide sizing calculations for the proposed interceptor swale(s).
[CSWPPP; Pg 9 of 14]
Correction 53:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Ecology has changed the criteria for sizing sediment ponds and traps in the 2019 manual. Resize the TESC pond using either the new 2019 Ecology criteria or the unmitigated post-developed flow rate ("inflow") from a continuous simulation model. Since this facility will discharge to the regulated stream along Pioneer, use the 10yr event.
[CSWPPP; Pg 10 of 14]
Correction 54:
See Document Markup
Comments:
If Baker Tanks are/will be used, provide supporting calculations for the sizing and number of tanks using the design criteria noted above.
[CSWPPP; Pg 10 of 14]
Correction 55:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout riser diameter; orifice diameter; outlet pipe size, mat'l, and slope; pipe IE; emergency spillway elev.
[CSWPPP; Pg 13 of 14]
Correction 56:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout and show staff guage.
[CSWPPP; Pg 13 of 14]
Correction 57:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Locate approval block in upper right-hand corner, all sheets, per CS Section 2.1.
[Plans C-1; Pg 1 of 25]
Correction 58:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Place North arrow correctly.
[Plans C-1; Pg 1 of 25]
Correction 59:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Locate Vicinity Map in lower right-hand corner per CS Section 2.1.
[Plans C-1; Pg 1 of 25]
Correction 60:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Locate address below Vicinity Map and add an abbreviated legal description below the title (1/4-section, Sec., Twp., Rng.)
[Plans C-1; Pg 1 of 25]
Correction 61:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Augment the Construction Sequence-See example.
[Plans C-1; Pg 1 of 25]
Correction 62:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify recording number.
[Plans C-1; Pg 1 of 25]
Correction 63:
See Document Markup
Comments:
RM-20.
[Plans C-1; Pg 1 of 25]
Correction 64:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add the following notes to this sheet:???? ??? ???? ?????? ???????????? ?? ?? ?????????? ?? ??? ???? ???? ??? ??? ?????? ??? ????? ??????? ???? ?????? ??????? ???? ???????????? ???????? ??? ???? ????? ????? ?? ??? ??????? ????? ???? ????????? ?? ?????????? ??? ?????????? ?????? ??? ????? ????? ??????????? ???? ??? ????? ????????? ?? ??????? ?????? ???????? ?? ??? ??? ?????? ???? ??? ?????? ???? ????? ??? ??????? ??? ???????????? ?? ? ????? ???? ???????? ????????????????????? ????? ????????? ? ?????????? ?????????? ?? ??????? ????????? ??????? ??? ???????? ??????? ??????????? ??? ????? ?????? ???? ??? ?????????? ????????? ?????????? ???? ??????? ???????? ??? ???? ????????????????????????? ?????? ????? ??? ?? ??????? ?? ????????? ?????? ??? ???????????? ?????? ?? ?????????? ???? ??? ????????? ????? ??????? ?????????? ????????????? ????????? ???????????? ?????? ????? ??? ?? ???????? ??? ???? ??????? ??????? ???????????? ?????? ?? ??? ???????? ?????????? ?????????? ???? ????? ???????????? ?? ???????? ??? ???? ?? ?????????? ??? ??????? ?????? ??? ?? ?? ???
Correction 65:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per City Standards 502.1, provide cross-sections at 200-ft spacing and extend 30-ft minimum beyond property limits. Callout setback distance between fill and property lines.
[Plans C-1; Pg 1 of 25]
Correction 66:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout earthwork quantities (cut/fill).
[Plans C-1; Pg 1 of 25]
Correction 67:
See Document Markup
Comments:
See Civil application PRCCP20230970 for review comments associated with the stormwater report. Incorporate those comments into the CFG design as appropriate.
[Plans C-1; Pg 1 of 25]
Correction 68:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide filter sock detail also.
[Plans C-2; Pg 2 of 25]
Correction 69:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Clarify- Silt Fence and Grading Limits are shown being located through an existing stormwater facility serving properties to the south. In addition, the storm facility is currently being regulated as a critical area due to the offsite stream that runs through the facility. Provide more information on how this storm facility will be protected, continue to function, and be restored to its original design criteria during the CFG operations.
[Plans C-2; Pg 2 of 25]
Correction 70:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout to protect existing storm drain associated with the storm facility serving properties to the south.
[Plans C-2; Pg 2 of 25]
Correction 71:
See Document Markup
Comments:
How is this outlet protected during the CFG operations?
[Plans C-2; Pg 2 of 25]
Correction 72:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coordinate this sheet with the TESC Plan in the CSWPP.
[Plans C-2; Pg 2 of 25]
Correction 73:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Identify the critical area buffer setback(s). Callout construction fencing along the setback line.
[Plans C-2; Pg 2 of 25]
Correction 74:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Place North arrow correctly.
[Plans C-2; Pg 2 of 25]
Correction 75:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-interceptor swale thru the middle of the construction entrance?
[Plans C-2; Pg 2 of 25]
Correction 76:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout interceptor swale(s). Callout max slope or provide spot elevations at 100ft intervals.
[Plans C-2; Pg 2 of 25]
Correction 77:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify leader location.
[Plans C-2; Pg 2 of 25]
Correction 78:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify leader location.
[Plans C-2; Pg 2 of 25]
Correction 79:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-Area 2.
[Plans C-2; Pg 2 of 25]
Correction 80:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout to protect existing storm conveyance system.
[Plans C-2; Pg 2 of 25]
Correction 81:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide minimum 5-ft setback between toe of fill slope and any critical area buffer (CS 502.6).
[Plans C-2; Pg 2 of 25]
Correction 82:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout to protect existing watermain.
[Plans C-2; Pg 2 of 25]
Correction 83:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Specify dispersion pads where the interceptor ditches enter the sediment pond (material requirements, pad dimensions including thickness).
[Plans C-2; Pg 2 of 25]
Correction 84:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout the following sediment pond information:
Pond Contours // Top of Berm Elev. // Bottom Elev // Bottom Area // Surface Area Req'd // Surface Area Provided // Side Slopes // Location of the TESC Riser // Size of Riser // Riser Orifice Size // Inlets and Outlets to Facility including protection // Baffle location and dimensions.
[Plans C-2; Pg 2 of 25]
Correction 85:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout to protect existing infrastructure (sewer and signal).
[Plans C-2; Pg 2 of 25]
Correction 86:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout interceptor swale(s). Callout max slope or provide spot elevations at 100ft intervals.
[Plans C-2; Pg 2 of 25]
Correction 87:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Ensure no ponding along adjacent properties as a result of fill. (Typical) (May need to provide a storm conveyance system to collect ponded water)
[Plans C-2; Pg 2 of 25]
Correction 88:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Keep filling operations within the limits of the property. Min. 2ft setback unless critical area, then 5ft to critical area buffer. (Typ)
[Plans C-2; Pg 2 of 25]
Correction 89:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify leader location.
[Plans C-2; Pg 2 of 25]
Correction 90:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Locate approval block in upper right-hand corner.
[Plans C-2; Pg 2 of 25]
Correction 91:
See Document Markup
Comments:
See Sht C-1 comments.
[Plans C-2; Pg 2 of 25]
Correction 92:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Clearly show and callout the property lines (Typ).
[Plans C-2; Pg 2 of 25]
Correction 93:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout to preserve and protect existing drainage ditch (a regulated stream) during the CFG operations.
[Plans C-2; Pg 2 of 25]
Correction 94:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout the release point and outfall for the TESC pond. Also show the emergency overflow location. [Plans C-2; Pg 2 of 25]
Correction 95:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per Ecology, pond should be broken into equivalent cells.
[Plans C-2; Pg 2 of 25]
Correction 96:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Delineate and callout the floodplain in accordance with the LOMR dated September 8, 2022. Any work within the designated floodplain shall comply with the requirements of PMC 21.07, particularly the compensatory storage and habitat assessment provisions.
[Plans C-2; Pg 2 of 25]
Correction 97:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Incorporate comments noted on Sht C-2.
[Plans C-3; Pg 3 of 25]
Correction 98:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Place North arrow correctly.
[Plans C-3; Pg 3 of 25]
Correction 99:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout and show check dams.
[Plans C-3; Pg 3 of 25]
Correction 100:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Proposed contours should be dark.
[Plans C-3; Pg 3 of 25]
Correction 101:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Existing contours should be light.
[Plans C-3; Pg 3 of 25]
Correction 102:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Existing contours should be light.
[Plans C-3; Pg 3 of 25]
Correction 103:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Existing contours should be light.
[Plans C-3; Pg 3 of 25]
Correction 104:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Readability.
[Plans C-3; Pg 3 of 25]
Correction 105:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Ensure no ponding along adjacent properties as a result of fill. (Typical) (May need to provide a storm conveyance system to collect ponded water)
[Plans C-3; Pg 3 of 25]
Correction 106:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout to protect existing water main.
[Plans C-3; Pg 3 of 25]
Correction 107:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout to protect existing infrastructure (sewer and signal).
[Plans C-3; Pg 3 of 25]
Correction 108:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Place North arrow correctly.
[Plans C-4; Pg 4 of 25]
Correction 109:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Incorporate comments noted on Sht C-2.
[Plans C-4; Pg 4 of 25]
Correction 110:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout conveyance between TESC pond and discharge location (size, material, slope, length, etc).
[Plans C-4; Pg 4 of 25]
Correction 111:
See Document Markup
Comments:
If tanks to be used, WQ and Flow Control calculations must be included in CSWPPP.
[Plans C-4; Pg 4 of 25]
Correction 112:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Clarify.
[Plans C-4; Pg 4 of 25]
Correction 113:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Please provide TESC Pond specifics noted on Sht C-2 on this sheet also.
[Plans C-4; Pg 4 of 25]
Correction 114:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout dispersion Pad.
[Plans C-4; Pg 4 of 25]
Correction 115:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add: "at top of riser".
[Plans C-4; Pg 4 of 25]
Correction 116:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout to protect existing infrastructure (sewer and signal).
[Plans C-4; Pg 4 of 25]
Correction 117:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout to protect existing water main.
[Plans C-4; Pg 4 of 25]
Correction 118:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show critical area setback and callout construction protective fencing.
[Plans C-4; Pg 4 of 25]
Correction 119:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Indicate Emergency Overflow location.
[Plans C-4; Pg 4 of 25]
Correction 120:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Place North arrow correctly.
[Plans C-5; Pg 5 of 25]
Correction 121:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Incorporate comments noted on Sht C-2.
[Plans C-5; Pg 5 of 25]
Correction 122:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Clarify-Is this an existing contour callout or proposed?
[Plans C-5; Pg 5 of 25]
Correction 123:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout existing contour elevations. (Typ)
[Plans C-5; Pg 5 of 25]
Correction 124:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout and show check dams.
[Plans C-5; Pg 5 of 25]
Correction 125:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout proposed contour elevations.
[Plans C-5; Pg 5 of 25]
Correction 126:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show critical area setback and callout construction protective fencing.
[Plans C-5; Pg 5 of 25]
Correction 127:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Place North arrow correctly.
[Plans C-6; Pg 6 of 25]
Correction 128:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Incorporate comments noted on Sht C-2.
[Plans C-6; Pg 6 of 25]
Correction 129:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify- C20-C25?
[Plans C-6; Pg 6 of 25]
Correction 130:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout and show check dams.
[Plans C-6; Pg 6 of 25]
Correction 131:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show existing storm facility serving properties to the south. Callout setback to the facility and construction protective fencing.
[Plans C-6; Pg 6 of 25]
Correction 132:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show and callout to protect existing storm conveyance system.
[Plans C-6; Pg 6 of 25]
Correction 133:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide interceptor swale detail with callouts.
[Plans C-7; Pg 7 of 25]
Correction 134:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add City Standard General Notes per CS Section 2.4.
[Plans C-7; Pg 7 of 25]
Correction 135:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Include the City's 'Grading, Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan Notes' per CS Section 505
[Plans C-7; Pg 7 of 25]
Correction 136:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout interceptor swale check dam spacing and provide detail with callouts.
[Plans C-7; Pg 7 of 25]
Correction 137:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Include the following City Standard Details in the CSWPPP:
02.03.02 // 05.01.01 // 05.02.01.
[Plans C-7; Pg 7 of 25]
Correction 138:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Please incorporate the information contained on this generic detail into the proposed TESC pond specific to the project. (Also, see comments Sht C-2).
[Plans C-7; Pg 7 of 25]
Correction 139:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify - C-7?
[Plans C-7; Pg 7 of 25]
Correction 140:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Due to high groundwater, provide a manufactured synthetic liner to prevent groundwater intrusion into the detention facilities. Callout the synthetic liner requirements and show on the RTank details. In addition, provide buoyancy verification (calculations and/or certification letter).
[Plans Sht C-8; Pg 8 of 25]
Correction 141:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use abbreviated legal description in title.
[Plans C-8; Pg 8 of 25]
Correction 142:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use abbreviated legal description in title.
[Plans C-9; Pg 9 of 25]
Correction 143:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use impermeable synthetic liner.
[Plans C-9; Pg 9 of 25]
Correction 144:
See Document Markup
Comments:
To be verified thru the Civil application.
[Plans C-9; Pg 9 of 25]
Correction 145:
See Document Markup
Comments:
To be verified thru the Civil application.
[Plans C-10; Pg 10 of 25]
Correction 146:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use impermeable synthetic liner.
[Plans C-10; Pg 10 of 25]
Correction 147:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use abbreviated legal description in title.
[Plans C-10; Pg 10 of 25]
Correction 148:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use abbreviated legal description in title.
[Plans C-11; Pg 11 of 25]
Correction 149:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use abbreviated legal description in title.
[Plans C-12; Pg 12 of 25]
Correction 150:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use abbreviated legal description in title.
[Plans C-13; Pg 13 of 25]
Correction 151:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify - C-14?
[Plans C-14; Pg 14 of 25]
Correction 152:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Due to high groundwater, provide a manufactured synthetic liner to prevent groundwater intrusion into the detention facilities. Callout the synthetic liner requirements and show on the RTank details. In addition, provide buoyancy verification (calculations and/or certification letter).
[Plans Sht C-14; Pg 14 of 25]
Correction 153:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use abbreviated legal description in title.
[Plans C-14; Pg 14 of 25]
Correction 154:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use abbreviated legal description in title.
[Plans C-15; Pg 15 of 25]
Correction 155:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use impermeable synthetic liner.
[Plans C-15; Pg 15 of 25]
Correction 156:
See Document Markup
Comments:
To be verified thru the Civil application.
[Plans C-15; Pg 15 of 25]
Correction 157:
See Document Markup
Comments:
To be verified thru the Civil application.
[Plans C-16; Pg 16 of 25]
Correction 158:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use impermeable synthetic liner.
[Plans C-16; Pg 16 of 25]
Correction 159:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use abbreviated legal description in title.
[Plans C-16; Pg 16 of 25]
Correction 160:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use abbreviated legal description in title.
[Plans C-17 Pg 17 of 25]
Correction 161:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use abbreviated legal description in title.
[Plans C-18; Pg 18 of 25]
Correction 162:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use abbreviated legal description in title.
[Plans C-19; Pg 19 of 25]
Correction 163:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Due to high groundwater, provide a manufactured synthetic liner to prevent groundwater intrusion into the detention facilities. Callout the synthetic liner requirements and show on the RTank details. In addition, provide buoyancy verification (calculations and/or certification letter).
[Plans Sht C-20; Pg 20 of 25]
Correction 164:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use abbreviated legal description in title.
[Plans C-20; Pg 20 of 25]
Correction 165:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify - C-21?
[Plans C-21; Pg 21 of 25]
Correction 166:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use abbreviated legal description in title.
[Plans C-21; Pg 21 of 25]
Correction 167:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use impermeable synthetic liner.
[Plans C-21; Pg 21 of 25]
Correction 168:
See Document Markup
Comments:
To be verified thru the Civil application.
[Plans C-21; Pg 21 of 25]
Correction 169:
See Document Markup
Comments:
To be verified thru the Civil application.
[Plans C-22; Pg 22 of 25]
Correction 170:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use impermeable synthetic liner.
[Plans C-22; Pg 22 of 25]
Correction 171:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use abbreviated legal description in title.
[Plans C-22; Pg 22 of 25]
Correction 172:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify - C-23?
[Plans C-23; Pg 23 of 25]
Correction 173:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use abbreviated legal description in title.
[Plans C-23 Pg 23 of 25]
Correction 174:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use abbreviated legal description in title.
[Plans C-25 Pg 25 of 25]
Correction 175:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Page references are still incorrect.
[CSWPPP; Pg 3 of 70]
Correction 176:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-as noted previously, the area enclosed by silt fence is 10+ acres and the draft storm report indicates roughly 460,000sf of disturbance.
[CSWPPP; Pg 4 of 70]
Correction 177:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-C140 is dust control. BMPs 200, 233, C241, and Baker Tank(s)?
[CSWPPP; Pg 5 of 70]
Correction 178:
See Document Markup
Comments:
BMP C140?
[CSWPPP; Pg 5 of 70]
Correction 179:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add: "Construct sediment control BMPs as one of the first steps of grading. These BMPs shall be functional before other land disturbing activities take place".
[CSWPPP; Pg 5 of 70]
Correction 180:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add: "the existing".
[CSWPPP; Pg 5 of 70]
Correction 181:
See Document Markup
Comments:
BMP C220?
[CSWPPP; Pg 6 of 70]
Correction 182:
See Document Markup
Comments:
BMP C209?
[CSWPPP; Pg 6 of 70]
Correction 183:
See Document Markup
Comments:
BMPs C151, C153, C154?
[CSWPPP; Pg 6 of 70]
Correction 184:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Please add the control descriptions noted on Pg 11 of 70.
[CSWPPP; Pg 6 of 70]
Correction 185:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Please add: "-Handle highly turbid or contaminated dewatering water separately from stormwater. -Discharge foundation, vault, and trench dewatering water which has characteristics similar to stormwater into a controlled conveyance system before discharge to a sediment trap or sediment pond. Clean dewatering water will not be routed through stormwater sediment ponds."
[CSWPPP; Pg 6 of 70]
Correction 186:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Please add: "All temporary and permanent Erosion and Sediment Control (ESC) BMPs shall be maintained and repaired as needed to ensure continued performance of their intended function. Visual monitoring of all BMPs installed at the site will be conducted at least once every calendar week and within 24 hours of any stormwater or non-stormwater discharge from the site. If the site becomes inactive and is temporarily stabilized, the inspection frequency may be reduced to once every calendar month."
[CSWPPP; Pg 6 of 70]
Correction 187:
See Document Markup
Comments:
BMPs C150, C160?
[CSWPPP; Pg 6 of 70]
Correction 188:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Please add the following control descriptions to Element 9 on Pg 6 of 70.
[CSWPPP; Pg 11 of 70]
Correction 189:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add: "Regulated Floodplain per".
[CSWPPP; Pg 14 of 70]
Correction 190:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per prior comment, provide sizing calculations for the proposed interceptor swale(s). (Reference CFG Plans, Detail 5/C7).
[CSWPPP; Pg 15 of 70]
Correction 191:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Replace w City Std Detail 02.03.02.
[CSWPPP; Pg 62 of 70]
Correction 192:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Replace w City Std Detail 05.02.01.
[CSWPPP; Pg 64 of 70]
Correction 193:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-per previous comment. This recording number does not exist on the Auditor's website.
[Plans C-1; Pg 1 of 28]
Correction 194:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add: "Caution: Existing12in storm main".
[Plans C-1; Pg 1 of 28]
Correction 195:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout to protect existing infrastructure (sewer and signal).
[Plans C-1; Pg 1 of 28]
Correction 196:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide DRAFT Cost Estimate on City form for all work associated with the CFG permit only (form available on the City's Development Engineering website).
[Plans C-1; Pg 1 of 28]
Correction 197:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-TESC Plan label?
[Plans C-2; Pg 2 of 28]
Correction 198:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-should the cross-section arrows be pointing north? See Section 5/C10.
[Plans C-2; Pg 2 of 28]
Correction 199:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per prior comment-Identify the critical area buffer setback(s). Callout construction fencing along the setback line.
[Plans C-2; Pg 2 of 28]
Correction 200:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per prior comment-Provide minimum 5-ft setback between toe of fill slope and any critical area buffer (CS 502.6).
[Plans C-2; Pg 2 of 28]
Correction 201:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-Detail reference.
[Plans C-2; Pg 2 of 28]
Correction 202:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add: "Regulated Floodplain per".
[Plans C-2; Pg 2 of 28]
Correction 203:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Fill placement within the regulated floodplain requires equivalent compensatory storage. Either protect the floodplain area from filling activity; or quantify the amount of compensatory storage required (provide calculations), and indicate the location of the compensatory storage area. Compensatory storage shall be at equivalent elevation(s) per FEMA/City regulations and the area protected in perpetuity.
[Plans C-2; Pg 2 of 28]
Correction 204:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Identify Parcel No.
[Plans C-2; Pg 2 of 28]
Correction 205:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout existing storm facility.
[Plans C-2; Pg 2 of 28]
Correction 206:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify leader location.
[Plans C-2; Pg 2 of 28]
Correction 207:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide x-section across property line. Clarify how surface water is not ponding along the property line as a result of the filling operations. (Typical) (May need to provide a storm conveyance system to collect ponded water)
[Plans C-3; Pg 3 of 28]
Correction 208:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Remove grading contour from adjacent property.
[Plans C-3; Pg 3 of 28]
Correction 209:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Remove grading contour from adjacent property.
[Plans C-3; Pg 3 of 28]
Correction 210:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add: "Typical".
[Plans C-3; Pg 3 of 28]
Correction 211:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Clearly show and callout the property lines (Typ).
[Plans C-3; Pg 3 of 25]
Correction 212:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Readability.
[Plans C-2; Pg 2 of 25]
Correction 213:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify- Shts C17-C22.
[Plans C-3; Pg 3 of 28]
Correction 214:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show existing sewer main and structures. Callout to protect.
[Plans C-4; Pg 4 of 28]
Correction 215:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per prior comment-Identify the critical area buffer setback(s). Callout construction fencing along the setback line.
[Plans C-4; Pg 4 of 28]
Correction 216:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify leader location.
[Plans C-4; Pg 4 of 28]
Correction 217:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-4/C7?
[Plans C-4; Pg 4 of 28]
Correction 218:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify leader location.
[Plans C-4; Pg 4 of 28]
Correction 219:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout depth of trench and/or top of grade board.
[Plans C-4; Pg 4 of 28]
Correction 220:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Clarify-using both a dispersion pad and dispersion trench? For the pad, callout size of quarry spalls, depth of spalls/pad, and pad dimensions.
[Plans C-4; Pg 4 of 28]
Correction 221:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Fill placement within the regulated floodplain requires equivalent compensatory storage. Either protect the floodplain area from filling activity; or quantify the amount of compensatory storage required (provide calculations), and indicate the location of the compensatory storage area. Compensatory storage shall be at equivalent elevation(s) per FEMA/City regulations and the area protected in perpetuity.
[Plans C-4; Pg 4 of 28]
Correction 222:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per prior comment-Provide minimum 5-ft setback between toe of fill slope and any critical area buffer (CS 502.6).
[Plans C-4; Pg 4 of 28]
Correction 223:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-pad location.
[Plans C-4; Pg 4 of 28]
Correction 224:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout to protect existing watermain.
[Plans C-4; Pg 4 of 28]
Correction 225:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout to protect existing storm system.
[Plans C-5; Pg 5 of 28]
Correction 226:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout construction entrance.
[Plans C-5; Pg 5 of 28]
Correction 227:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify- Shts C23-C28.
[Plans C-5; Pg 5 of 28]
Correction 228:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per prior comment-Identify the critical area buffer setback(s). Callout construction fencing along the setback line.
[Plans C-5; Pg 5 of 28]
Correction 229:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per prior comment-Provide minimum 5-ft setback between toe of fill slope and any critical area buffer (CS 502.6).
[Plans C-5; Pg 5 of 28]
Correction 230:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout to protect existing storm outfall.
[Plans C-5; Pg 5 of 28]
Correction 231:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Clarify.
[Plans C-5; Pg 5 of 28]
Correction 232:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify leader location.
[Plans C-6; Pg 6 of 28]
Correction 233:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify- Shts C23-C28.
[Plans C-6; Pg 6 of 28]
Correction 234:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout to protect existing storm system.
[Plans C-6; Pg 6 of 28]
Correction 235:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per prior comment, provide sizing calculations for the proposed interceptor swale(s).
[Plans; Sht 7 of 28]
Correction 236:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Please use Ecology's dispersion trench detail, Figure V-1.8.
[Plans; Sht 7 of 28]
Correction 237:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per prior comment-Add City Standard General Notes per CS Section 2.4.
[Plans C-7; Pg 7 of 28]
Correction 238:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide offset amount.
[Plans C-9; Pg 9 of 28]
Correction 239:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show and callout existing roadside stream/ditch.
[Plans C-9; Pg 9 of 28]
Correction 240:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide H/V scale per City Stds. The consistency between the horizontal scale and the vertical scale shall be on a ratio of 10 to 1 (i.e., 1" = 20' horizontal; 1" = 2' vertical).
[Plans C-9; Pg 9 of 28]
Correction 241:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide 'Existing Grade' and 'Proposed Grade' elevations at 50ft intervals.
[Plans C-9; Pg 9 of 28]
Correction 242:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide offset amount.
[Plans C-9; Pg 9 of 28]
Correction 243:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide H/V scale per City Stds. The consistency between the horizontal scale and the vertical scale shall be on a ratio of 10 to 1 (i.e., 1" = 20' horizontal; 1" = 2' vertical).
[Plans C-10; Pg 10 of 28]
Correction 244:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide 'Existing Grade' and 'Proposed Grade' elevations at 50ft intervals.
[Plans C-10; Pg 10 of 28]
Correction 245:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide offset amount.
[Plans C-10; Pg 10 of 28]
Correction 246:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Confirm-this appears to be the existing storm pond...is the x-section cut on Sht C2 baclwards?
[Plans C-10; Pg 10 of 28]
Correction 247:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide offset amount.
[Plans C-10; Pg 10 of 28]
Correction 248:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide offset amount.
[Plans C-10; Pg 10 of 28]
Correction 249:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Confirm module layout based on the subasin analysis (stage-storage requirements) per Storm Report comments, Pg 117 of 164.
[Plans C-11; Pg 11 of 28]
Correction 250:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Revise to "minimum 30mil ultraviolet (UV) light resistant impermeable geomembrane liner".
[Plans C-12; Pg 12 of 28]
Correction 251:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per civil review comment: Confirm stage-storage requirements with subasin analysis per Storm Report comments, Pg 117 of 164.
[Plans C-12; Pg 12 of 28]
Correction 252:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per civil review comment: Ensure available storage accounts for 6in of sediment storage per Ecology's requirements.
[Plans C-12; Pg 12 of 28]
Correction 253:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide buoyancy calculations prior to CFG approval and include in the project storm report.
[Plans C-12; Pg 12 of 28]
Correction 254:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per civil review comment: Confirm stage-storage requirements with subasin analysis per Storm Report comments, Pg 117 of 164.
[Plans C-13; Pg 13 of 28]
Correction 255:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per civil review comment: Confirm stage-storage requirements with subasin analysis per Storm Report comments, Pg 117 of 164.
[Plans C-13; Pg 13 of 28]
Correction 256:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per civil review comment: Ensure available storage accounts for 6in of sediment storage per Ecology's requirements.
[Plans C-13; Pg 13 of 28]
Correction 257:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide geotextile impermeable liner properties per Ecology Table V-1.6. Also indicate the line shall be ultraviolet (UV) light resistant.
[Plans C-16; Pg 16 of 28]
Correction 258:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Confirm module layout based on the subasin analysis (stage-storage requirements) per Storm Report comments, Pg 117 of 164.
[Plans C-17; Pg 17 of 28]
Correction 259:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Revise to "minimum 30mil ultraviolet (UV) light resistant impermeable geomembrane liner".
[Plans C-18; Pg 18 of 28]
Correction 260:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per civil review comment: Confirm stage-storage requirements with subasin analysis per Storm Report comments, Pg 117 of 164.
[Plans C-18; Pg 18 of 28]
Correction 261:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per civil review comment: Ensure available storage accounts for 6in of sediment storage per Ecology's requirements.
[Plans C-18; Pg 18 of 28]
Correction 262:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide buoyancy calculations prior to CFG approval and include in the project storm report.
[Plans C-18; Pg 18 of 28]
Correction 263:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per civil review comment: Confirm stage-storage requirements with subasin analysis per Storm Report comments, Pg 117 of 164.
[Plans C-19; Pg 19 of 28]
Correction 264:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per civil review comment: Confirm stage-storage requirements with subasin analysis per Storm Report comments, Pg 117 of 164.
[Plans C-19; Pg 19 of 28]
Correction 265:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per civil review comment: Ensure available storage accounts for 6in of sediment storage per Ecology's requirements.
[Plans C-19; Pg 19 of 28]
Correction 266:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide geotextile impermeable liner properties per Ecology Table V-1.6. Also indicate the line shall be ultraviolet (UV) light resistant.
[Plans C-22; Pg 22 of 28]
Correction 267:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Confirm module layout based on the subasin analysis (stage-storage requirements) per Storm Report comments, Pg 117 of 164.
[Plans C-23; Pg 23 of 28]
Correction 268:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Revise to "minimum 30mil ultraviolet (UV) light resistant impermeable geomembrane liner".
[Plans C-24; Pg 24 of 28]
Correction 269:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per civil review comment: Confirm stage-storage requirements with subasin analysis per Storm Report comments, Pg 117 of 164.
[Plans C-24; Pg 24 of 28]
Correction 270:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per civil review comment: Ensure available storage accounts for 6in of sediment storage per Ecology's requirements.
[Plans C-24; Pg 24 of 28]
Correction 271:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide buoyancy calculations prior to CFG approval and include in the project storm report.
[Plans C-24; Pg 24 of 28]
Correction 272:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per civil review comment: Confirm stage-storage requirements with subasin analysis per Storm Report comments, Pg 117 of 164.
[Plans C-25; Pg 25 of 28]
Correction 273:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per civil review comment: Confirm stage-storage requirements with subasin analysis per Storm Report comments, Pg 117 of 164.
[Plans C-25; Pg 25 of 28]
Correction 274:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per civil review comment: Ensure available storage accounts for 6in of sediment storage per Ecology's requirements.
[Plans C-25; Pg 25 of 28]
Correction 275:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide geotextile impermeable liner properties per Ecology Table V-1.6. Also indicate the line shall be ultraviolet (UV) light resistant.
[Plans C-28; Pg 28 of 28]
Engineering Traffic Review
Approved
08/21/2023
08/15/2023
Reviewer:
Corrections:
Correction 1:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide a note on plans that restricts direct construction access to Shaw Rd. Construction access will only be allowed on E Pioneer for the duration of project. [Plans C-4; Page 4 of 25]
Correction 2:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide note that restricts direct construction access to Shaw Rd. Construction access will only be allowed on E Pioneer for the duration of project. Also, please reference Mark Higginson's comments on sheet C-1 regarding track out conditions. [Plans C-2; Page 2 of 25]
Planning Review
Failed
08/21/2023
08/14/2023
Reviewer:
Corrections:
Correction 1:
Miscellaneous Planning Correction
Comments:
Modify site grading plans to address all comments from Engineering regarding critical area buffer preservation and protection. Limits of clearing shall be consistent with all buffer areas and critical area reports - buffer areas cannot be graded under this permit. Please delineate and use protective fencing. Also address the delineation of any existing 100 year floodplain (also commented on by Engineering). [UPDATED COMMENT 08/14/23: Please call out buffer width dimension and OHWM for Pioneer stream and use line type to delineate protective fencing at the outer edge. Its still not clear where the stream OHWM is located and how the limits of clearing are being established to meet protective buffer area. Please include a high vis construction fencing detail to protect critical areas.
Correction 2:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
Grading appears to elevate the existing site grade above the adjacent ROW. Please consult PMC 20.58.005 (2) as there are limits on the overall height of all retaining walls near rights of way and abutting properties.
Public Works Water Review
Approved
08/21/2023
08/09/2023
Reviewer:
Public Works Streets Review
Approved
08/21/2023
08/07/2023
Reviewer:
Public Works Collection Review
Approved
08/21/2023
08/07/2023
Reviewer:
Fire Review
Approved
08/21/2023
08/01/2023
Reviewer:
Planning Review
Failed
08/15/2023
07/19/2023
Reviewer:
Corrections:
Correction 1:
Miscellaneous Planning Correction
Comments:
Modify site grading plans to address all comments from Engineering regarding critical area buffer preservation and protection. Limits of clearing shall be consistent with all buffer areas and critical area reports - buffer areas cannot be graded under this permit. Please delineate and use protective fencing. Also address the delineation of any existing 100 year floodplain (also commented on by Engineering).
Correction 2:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
Grading appears to elevate the existing site grade above the adjacent ROW. Please consult PMC 20.58.005 (2) as there are limits on the overall height of all retaining walls near rights of way and abutting properties.
Engineering Traffic Review
Failed
08/15/2023
07/19/2023
Reviewer:
Corrections:
Correction 1:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide a note on plans that restricts direct construction access to Shaw Rd. Construction access will only be allowed on E Pioneer for the duration of project. [Plans C-4; Page 4 of 25]
Correction 2:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide note that restricts direct construction access to Shaw Rd. Construction access will only be allowed on E Pioneer for the duration of project. Also, please reference Mark Higginson's comments on sheet C-1 regarding track out conditions. [Plans C-2; Page 2 of 25]
Public Works Streets Review
Approved
08/15/2023
07/18/2023
Reviewer:
Engineering Civil Review
Failed
08/15/2023
07/18/2023
Reviewer:
Corrections:
Correction 1:
See Document Markup
Comments:
See Civil application PRCCP20230970 for review comments associated with the stormwater report. Incorporate those comments into the CFG design as appropriate.
[Storm Report; Pg 1 of 164]
Correction 2:
See Document Markup
Comments:
1st Review
PRGR20230972
July 2023
Correction 3:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Revise the CSWPPP to provide the project-specific information outlined in Ecology's SWPPP template.
[CSWPPP; Pg 1 of 14]
Correction 4:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Revise accordingly.
[CSWPPP; Pg 3 of 14]
Correction 5:
See Document Markup
Comments:
In an appendix, include Ecology's BMP descriptions and details being used on the site as applicable:
BMPs C102 // C103 // C105 // C106 // C107 // C120 // C121 // C123 // C140 // C150 // C151 // C152 // C153 // C154 // C160 // C200 // C201 // C207 // C208 // C209 // C220 // C233 // C235 // C241 // C251.
[CSWPPP; Pg 3 of 14]
Correction 6:
See Document Markup
Comments:
See Ecology, Section II-2.4 for additional items to be included in the CSWPPP:
Discuss Critical Areas // Discuss Onsite Soils (soils map and descriptions) // Include a Vicinity Map.
[CSWPPP; Pg 3 of 14]
Correction 7:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Include a sample CSWPPP Site Inpection Form.
[CSWPPP; Pg 3 of 14]
Correction 8:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Include the following City Standard Details in the CSWPPP:
02.03.02 // 05.01.01 // 05.02.01.
[CSWPPP; Pg 3 of 14]
Correction 9:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-...4054? ...4053 is listed twice.
[CSWPPP; Pg 4 of 14]
Correction 10:
See Document Markup
Comments:
For each element, list the associated BMP number(s) from the Ecology Manual for the chosen BMP.
[CSWPPP; Pg 4 of 14]
Correction 11:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Revise-the property is 11+ acres, and the area enclosed by silt fence on Sht C-2 is 10+ acres.
[CSWPPP; Pg 4 of 14]
Correction 12:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Address protecting the existing storm facility serving the properties to the south as well as the regulated stream that runs through it.
[CSWPPP; Pg 4 of 14]
Correction 13:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Describe what is required if sediment is tracked off-site onto the public ROW.
[CSWPPP; Pg 4 of 14]
Correction 14:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide commentary that the permanent flow control systems must be constructed and functioning prior to constructing onsite hard surfaces.
[CSWPPP; Pg 4 of 14]
Correction 15:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Clarify-Baker Tanks are called out on Sht C-2 (pg 8 of 14) in this SWPPP. Are they to be used in conjunction with the sediment pond? As a fail-safe?
[CSWPPP; Pg 4 of 14]
Correction 16:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add that this element must be completed prior to mass grading operations.
[CSWPPP; Pg 4 of 14]
Correction 17:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Describe how to respond if sediment controls are ineffective and turbid water is observed discharging from the site.
[CSWPPP; Pg 4 of 14]
Correction 18:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide additional description...(i.e. temporary and permanent seeding, mulching, erosion control fabrics, etc.).
[CSWPPP; Pg 5 of 14]
Correction 19:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add:
-Stabilize soils at the end of the shift before a holiday or weekend if needed based on the weather forecast.
-Stabilize soil stockpiles from erosion, protect with sediment trapping measures, and where possible locate stockpiles away from drainage facilities (waterways, storm inlets, channels, etc.)
[CSWPPP; Pg 5 of 14]
Correction 20:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Address dust control also.
[CSWPPP; Pg 5 of 14]
Correction 21:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add:
-Divert offsite surface water (run-on) away from slopes and disturbed areas with interceptor dikes, swales, and/or pipes. Offsite surface water should be managed separately from surface water generated onsite.
[CSWPPP; Pg 5 of 14]
Correction 22:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add:
-Inlet protection devices will be cleaned (or removed and replaced), when sediment has filled the device by one third (1/3) or as specified by the manufacturer.
-Inlets will be inspected weekly at a minimum and daily during storm events.
[CSWPPP; Pg 5 of 14]
Correction 23:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add:
-Provide stabilization, including armoring material (if approved), adequate to prevent erosion of outlets, adjacent stream banks, slopes, and downstream reaches, at the outlets of all conveyance systems.
[CSWPPP; Pg 5 of 14]
Correction 24:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Revise to read..."regulations and this CSWPPP".
[CSWPPP; Pg 5 of 14]
Correction 25:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Discuss items outlined in Ecology's CSWPPP template (waste materials, equipment maintenance and fueling activities, concrete truck washout, etc.).
[CSWPPP; Pg 5 of 14]
Correction 26:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Discuss dewatering items outlined in Ecology's CSWPPP template under Element 10.
[CSWPPP; Pg 5 of 14]
Correction 27:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add additional description as outlined in Ecology's CSWPPP template under Element 11.
[CSWPPP; Pg 5 of 14]
Correction 28:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add additional description as outlined in Ecology's CSWPPP template under Element 12.
[CSWPPP; Pg 5 of 14]
Correction 29:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Based on the current civil design strategy, individual LID elements are not being incorporated (project is attempting to meet the LID Performance Standard). However, this must be confirmed prior to final approval of the civil design.
[CSWPPP; Pg 6 of 14]
Correction 30:
See Document Markup
Comments:
List the Pollution Prevention Team, their title, and contact info for the project. For persons yet to be determined, use "TBD".
[CSWPPP; Pg 6 of 14]
Correction 31:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide Monitoring and Sampling criteria...for reference, see Ecology's CSWPPP template.
[CSWPPP; Pg 6 of 14]
Correction 32:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Discuss Reporting and Record Keeping criteria...for reference, see Ecology's CSWPPP template.
[CSWPPP; Pg 6 of 14]
Correction 33:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Include the items noted in the Appendix/Glossary of Ecology's CSWPPP template as applicable to the project.
[CSWPPP; Pg 6 of 14]
Correction 34:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify location of inlet protection callouts. Inlet Protection shall be provided at inlets along the project frontage (Typ).
[CSWPPP; Pg 8 of 14]
Correction 35:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-2/C2?
[CSWPPP; Pg 8 of 14]
Correction 36:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Clarify-Is this for filtration? TESC flow control? Both? A sediment pond is called out on the CFG plans and sediment pond calculations are provided in this document, but no sed-pond is shown here.
[CSWPPP; Pg 8 of 14]
Correction 37:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout to protect existing watermain.
[CSWPPP; Pg 8 of 14]
Correction 38:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout to protect existing infrastructure (sewer and signal).
[CSWPPP; Pg 8 of 14]
Correction 39:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coordinate this sheet with the TESC Plan in the CFG set.
[CSWPPP; Pg 8 of 14]
Correction 40:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify callout...don't believe there is an inlet at this location.
[CSWPPP; Pg 8 of 14]
Correction 41:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-1/C3?
[CSWPPP; Pg 8 of 14]
Correction 42:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Sediment pond calculations are provided, but no pond is shown. If a sediment pond is to be used, provide the following information:
Pond Contours // Top of Berm Elev. // Bottom Elev // Bottom Area // Surface Area Req'd // Surface Area Provided // Location of the TESC Riser // Size of Riser // Riser Orifice Size // Inlets and Outlets to Facility including protection // Baffle location and dimensions.
[CSWPPP; Pg 8 of 14]
Correction 43:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Clarify-This is an existing storm facility serving properties to the south. In addition, the storm facility is currently being regulated as a critical area due to the offsite stream that has breached the pond berm and runs through the facility. Provide more information on how this storm facility will continue to function and the stream protected during the CFG operations.
[CSWPPP; Pg 8 of 14]
Correction 44:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Clarify-Baker Tanks are discharging to the existing flow control structure serving properties to the south. Not sure how that works.
[CSWPPP; Pg 8 of 14]
Correction 45:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout to protect existing storm drain associated with the storm facility serving properties to the south.
[CSWPPP; Pg 8 of 14]
Correction 46:
See Document Markup
Comments:
How is this outlet protected during the CFG operations?
[CSWPPP; Pg 8 of 14]
Correction 47:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide Construction Sequence per CS 501.6.
[CSWPPP; Pg 8 of 14]
Correction 48:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Include the City's 'Grading, Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan Notes' per CS Section 505.
[CSWPPP; Pg 8 of 14]
Correction 49:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide filter sock detail also.
[Plans C-2; Pg 2 of 25]
Correction 50:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout to preserve and protect existing drainage ditch (a regulated stream) during the CFG operations.
[Plans C-2; Pg 2 of 25]
Correction 51:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Delineate and callout the floodplain in accordance with the LOMR dated September 8, 2022. Any work within the designated floodplain shall comply with the requirements of PMC 21.07, particularly the compensatory storage and habitat assessment provisions.
[CSWPPP; Pg 8 of 14]
Correction 52:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide sizing calculations for the proposed interceptor swale(s).
[CSWPPP; Pg 9 of 14]
Correction 53:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Ecology has changed the criteria for sizing sediment ponds and traps in the 2019 manual. Resize the TESC pond using either the new 2019 Ecology criteria or the unmitigated post-developed flow rate ("inflow") from a continuous simulation model. Since this facility will discharge to the regulated stream along Pioneer, use the 10yr event.
[CSWPPP; Pg 10 of 14]
Correction 54:
See Document Markup
Comments:
If Baker Tanks are/will be used, provide supporting calculations for the sizing and number of tanks using the design criteria noted above.
[CSWPPP; Pg 10 of 14]
Correction 55:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout riser diameter; orifice diameter; outlet pipe size, mat'l, and slope; pipe IE; emergency spillway elev.
[CSWPPP; Pg 13 of 14]
Correction 56:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout and show staff guage.
[CSWPPP; Pg 13 of 14]
Correction 57:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Locate approval block in upper right-hand corner, all sheets, per CS Section 2.1.
[Plans C-1; Pg 1 of 25]
Correction 58:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Place North arrow correctly.
[Plans C-1; Pg 1 of 25]
Correction 59:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Locate Vicinity Map in lower right-hand corner per CS Section 2.1.
[Plans C-1; Pg 1 of 25]
Correction 60:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Locate address below Vicinity Map and add an abbreviated legal description below the title (1/4-section, Sec., Twp., Rng.)
[Plans C-1; Pg 1 of 25]
Correction 61:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Augment the Construction Sequence-See example.
[Plans C-1; Pg 1 of 25]
Correction 62:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify recording number.
[Plans C-1; Pg 1 of 25]
Correction 63:
See Document Markup
Comments:
RM-20.
[Plans C-1; Pg 1 of 25]
Correction 64:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add the following notes to this sheet:
-“At any time during construction it is determined by the City that mud and debris are being tracked onto public streets with insufficient cleanup, all work shall cease on the project until this condition is corrected. The contractor and/or the owner shall immediately take all steps necessary to prevent future tracking of mud and debris into the public ROW, which may include the installation of a wheel wash facility on-site.”
-“Contractor shall designate a Washington Department of Ecology certified erosion and sediment control leadperson, and shall comply with the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) prepared for this project.”
-“Sediment-laden runoff shall not be allowed to discharge beyond the construction limits in accordance with the Project’s NPDES General Stormwater Permit.”
-“Any permanent infiltration system shall not be utilized for TESC runoff. Connect infiltration system to the upstream stormwater conveyance only after construction is complete and site is stabilized and paved.”
[Plans C-1; Pg 1 of 25]
Correction 65:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per City Standards 502.1, provide cross-sections at 200-ft spacing and extend 30-ft minimum beyond property limits. Callout setback distance between fill and property lines.
[Plans C-1; Pg 1 of 25]
Correction 66:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout earthwork quantities (cut/fill).
[Plans C-1; Pg 1 of 25]
Correction 67:
See Document Markup
Comments:
See Civil application PRCCP20230970 for review comments associated with the stormwater report. Incorporate those comments into the CFG design as appropriate.
[Plans C-1; Pg 1 of 25]
Correction 68:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide filter sock detail also.
[Plans C-2; Pg 2 of 25]
Correction 69:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Clarify- Silt Fence and Grading Limits are shown being located through an existing stormwater facility serving properties to the south. In addition, the storm facility is currently being regulated as a critical area due to the offsite stream that runs through the facility. Provide more information on how this storm facility will be protected, continue to function, and be restored to its original design criteria during the CFG operations.
[Plans C-2; Pg 2 of 25]
Correction 70:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout to protect existing storm drain associated with the storm facility serving properties to the south.
[Plans C-2; Pg 2 of 25]
Correction 71:
See Document Markup
Comments:
How is this outlet protected during the CFG operations?
[Plans C-2; Pg 2 of 25]
Correction 72:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coordinate this sheet with the TESC Plan in the CSWPP.
[Plans C-2; Pg 2 of 25]
Correction 73:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Identify the critical area buffer setback(s). Callout construction fencing along the setback line.
[Plans C-2; Pg 2 of 25]
Correction 74:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Place North arrow correctly.
[Plans C-2; Pg 2 of 25]
Correction 75:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-interceptor swale thru the middle of the construction entrance?
[Plans C-2; Pg 2 of 25]
Correction 76:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout interceptor swale(s). Callout max slope or provide spot elevations at 100ft intervals.
[Plans C-2; Pg 2 of 25]
Correction 77:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify leader location.
[Plans C-2; Pg 2 of 25]
Correction 78:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify leader location.
[Plans C-2; Pg 2 of 25]
Correction 79:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-Area 2.
[Plans C-2; Pg 2 of 25]
Correction 80:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout to protect existing storm conveyance system.
[Plans C-2; Pg 2 of 25]
Correction 81:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide minimum 5-ft setback between toe of fill slope and any critical area buffer (CS 502.6).
[Plans C-2; Pg 2 of 25]
Correction 82:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout to protect existing watermain.
[Plans C-2; Pg 2 of 25]
Correction 83:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Specify dispersion pads where the interceptor ditches enter the sediment pond (material requirements, pad dimensions including thickness).
[Plans C-2; Pg 2 of 25]
Correction 84:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout the following sediment pond information:
Pond Contours // Top of Berm Elev. // Bottom Elev // Bottom Area // Surface Area Req'd // Surface Area Provided // Side Slopes // Location of the TESC Riser // Size of Riser // Riser Orifice Size // Inlets and Outlets to Facility including protection // Baffle location and dimensions.
[Plans C-2; Pg 2 of 25]
Correction 85:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout to protect existing infrastructure (sewer and signal).
[Plans C-2; Pg 2 of 25]
Correction 86:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout interceptor swale(s). Callout max slope or provide spot elevations at 100ft intervals.
[Plans C-2; Pg 2 of 25]
Correction 87:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Ensure no ponding along adjacent properties as a result of fill. (Typical) (May need to provide a storm conveyance system to collect ponded water)
[Plans C-2; Pg 2 of 25]
Correction 88:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Keep filling operations within the limits of the property. Min. 2ft setback unless critical area, then 5ft to critical area buffer. (Typ)
[Plans C-2; Pg 2 of 25]
Correction 89:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify leader location.
[Plans C-2; Pg 2 of 25]
Correction 90:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Locate approval block in upper right-hand corner.
[Plans C-2; Pg 2 of 25]
Correction 91:
See Document Markup
Comments:
See Sht C-1 comments.
[Plans C-2; Pg 2 of 25]
Correction 92:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Clearly show and callout the property lines (Typ).
[Plans C-2; Pg 2 of 25]
Correction 93:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout to preserve and protect existing drainage ditch (a regulated stream) during the CFG operations.
[Plans C-2; Pg 2 of 25]
Correction 94:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout the release point and outfall for the TESC pond. Also show the emergency overflow location. [Plans C-2; Pg 2 of 25]
Correction 95:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per Ecology, pond should be broken into equivalent cells.
[Plans C-2; Pg 2 of 25]
Correction 96:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Delineate and callout the floodplain in accordance with the LOMR dated September 8, 2022. Any work within the designated floodplain shall comply with the requirements of PMC 21.07, particularly the compensatory storage and habitat assessment provisions.
[Plans C-2; Pg 2 of 25]
Correction 97:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Incorporate comments noted on Sht C-2.
[Plans C-3; Pg 3 of 25]
Correction 98:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Place North arrow correctly.
[Plans C-3; Pg 3 of 25]
Correction 99:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout and show check dams.
[Plans C-3; Pg 3 of 25]
Correction 100:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Proposed contours should be dark.
[Plans C-3; Pg 3 of 25]
Correction 101:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Existing contours should be light.
[Plans C-3; Pg 3 of 25]
Correction 102:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Existing contours should be light.
[Plans C-3; Pg 3 of 25]
Correction 103:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Existing contours should be light.
[Plans C-3; Pg 3 of 25]
Correction 104:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Readability.
[Plans C-3; Pg 3 of 25]
Correction 105:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Ensure no ponding along adjacent properties as a result of fill. (Typical) (May need to provide a storm conveyance system to collect ponded water)
[Plans C-3; Pg 3 of 25]
Correction 106:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout to protect existing water main.
[Plans C-3; Pg 3 of 25]
Correction 107:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout to protect existing infrastructure (sewer and signal).
[Plans C-3; Pg 3 of 25]
Correction 108:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Place North arrow correctly.
[Plans C-4; Pg 4 of 25]
Correction 109:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Incorporate comments noted on Sht C-2.
[Plans C-4; Pg 4 of 25]
Correction 110:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout conveyance between TESC pond and discharge location (size, material, slope, length, etc).
[Plans C-4; Pg 4 of 25]
Correction 111:
See Document Markup
Comments:
If tanks to be used, WQ and Flow Control calculations must be included in CSWPPP.
[Plans C-4; Pg 4 of 25]
Correction 112:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Clarify.
[Plans C-4; Pg 4 of 25]
Correction 113:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Please provide TESC Pond specifics noted on Sht C-2 on this sheet also.
[Plans C-4; Pg 4 of 25]
Correction 114:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout dispersion Pad.
[Plans C-4; Pg 4 of 25]
Correction 115:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add: "at top of riser".
[Plans C-4; Pg 4 of 25]
Correction 116:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout to protect existing infrastructure (sewer and signal).
[Plans C-4; Pg 4 of 25]
Correction 117:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout to protect existing water main.
[Plans C-4; Pg 4 of 25]
Correction 118:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show critical area setback and callout construction protective fencing.
[Plans C-4; Pg 4 of 25]
Correction 119:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Indicate Emergency Overflow location.
[Plans C-4; Pg 4 of 25]
Correction 120:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Place North arrow correctly.
[Plans C-5; Pg 5 of 25]
Correction 121:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Incorporate comments noted on Sht C-2.
[Plans C-5; Pg 5 of 25]
Correction 122:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Clarify-Is this an existing contour callout or proposed?
[Plans C-5; Pg 5 of 25]
Correction 123:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout existing contour elevations. (Typ)
[Plans C-5; Pg 5 of 25]
Correction 124:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout and show check dams.
[Plans C-5; Pg 5 of 25]
Correction 125:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout proposed contour elevations.
[Plans C-5; Pg 5 of 25]
Correction 126:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show critical area setback and callout construction protective fencing.
[Plans C-5; Pg 5 of 25]
Correction 127:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Place North arrow correctly.
[Plans C-6; Pg 6 of 25]
Correction 128:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Incorporate comments noted on Sht C-2.
[Plans C-6; Pg 6 of 25]
Correction 129:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify- C20-C25?
[Plans C-6; Pg 6 of 25]
Correction 130:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout and show check dams.
[Plans C-6; Pg 6 of 25]
Correction 131:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show existing storm facility serving properties to the south. Callout setback to the facility and construction protective fencing.
[Plans C-6; Pg 6 of 25]
Correction 132:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show and callout to protect existing storm conveyance system.
[Plans C-6; Pg 6 of 25]
Correction 133:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide interceptor swale detail with callouts.
[Plans C-7; Pg 7 of 25]
Correction 134:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add City Standard General Notes per CS Section 2.4.
[Plans C-7; Pg 7 of 25]
Correction 135:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Include the City's 'Grading, Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan Notes' per CS Section 505
[Plans C-7; Pg 7 of 25]
Correction 136:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout interceptor swale check dam spacing and provide detail with callouts.
[Plans C-7; Pg 7 of 25]
Correction 137:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Include the following City Standard Details in the CSWPPP:
02.03.02 // 05.01.01 // 05.02.01.
[Plans C-7; Pg 7 of 25]
Correction 138:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Please incorporate the information contained on this generic detail into the proposed TESC pond specific to the project. (Also, see comments Sht C-2).
[Plans C-7; Pg 7 of 25]
Correction 139:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify - C-7?
[Plans C-7; Pg 7 of 25]
Correction 140:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Due to high groundwater, provide a manufactured synthetic liner to prevent groundwater intrusion into the detention facilities. Callout the synthetic liner requirements and show on the RTank details. In addition, provide buoyancy verification (calculations and/or certification letter).
[Plans Sht C-8; Pg 8 of 25]
Correction 141:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use abbreviated legal description in title.
[Plans C-8; Pg 8 of 25]
Correction 142:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use abbreviated legal description in title.
[Plans C-9; Pg 9 of 25]
Correction 143:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use impermeable synthetic liner.
[Plans C-9; Pg 9 of 25]
Correction 144:
See Document Markup
Comments:
To be verified thru the Civil application.
[Plans C-9; Pg 9 of 25]
Correction 145:
See Document Markup
Comments:
To be verified thru the Civil application.
[Plans C-10; Pg 10 of 25]
Correction 146:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use impermeable synthetic liner.
[Plans C-10; Pg 10 of 25]
Correction 147:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use abbreviated legal description in title.
[Plans C-10; Pg 10 of 25]
Correction 148:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use abbreviated legal description in title.
[Plans C-11; Pg 11 of 25]
Correction 149:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use abbreviated legal description in title.
[Plans C-12; Pg 12 of 25]
Correction 150:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use abbreviated legal description in title.
[Plans C-13; Pg 13 of 25]
Correction 151:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify - C-14?
[Plans C-14; Pg 14 of 25]
Correction 152:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Due to high groundwater, provide a manufactured synthetic liner to prevent groundwater intrusion into the detention facilities. Callout the synthetic liner requirements and show on the RTank details. In addition, provide buoyancy verification (calculations and/or certification letter).
[Plans Sht C-14; Pg 14 of 25]
Correction 153:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use abbreviated legal description in title.
[Plans C-14; Pg 14 of 25]
Correction 154:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use abbreviated legal description in title.
[Plans C-15; Pg 15 of 25]
Correction 155:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use impermeable synthetic liner.
[Plans C-15; Pg 15 of 25]
Correction 156:
See Document Markup
Comments:
To be verified thru the Civil application.
[Plans C-15; Pg 15 of 25]
Correction 157:
See Document Markup
Comments:
To be verified thru the Civil application.
[Plans C-16; Pg 16 of 25]
Correction 158:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use impermeable synthetic liner.
[Plans C-16; Pg 16 of 25]
Correction 159:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use abbreviated legal description in title.
[Plans C-16; Pg 16 of 25]
Correction 160:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use abbreviated legal description in title.
[Plans C-17 Pg 17 of 25]
Correction 161:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use abbreviated legal description in title.
[Plans C-18; Pg 18 of 25]
Correction 162:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use abbreviated legal description in title.
[Plans C-19; Pg 19 of 25]
Correction 163:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Due to high groundwater, provide a manufactured synthetic liner to prevent groundwater intrusion into the detention facilities. Callout the synthetic liner requirements and show on the RTank details. In addition, provide buoyancy verification (calculations and/or certification letter).
[Plans Sht C-20; Pg 20 of 25]
Correction 164:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use abbreviated legal description in title.
[Plans C-20; Pg 20 of 25]
Correction 165:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify - C-21?
[Plans C-21; Pg 21 of 25]
Correction 166:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use abbreviated legal description in title.
[Plans C-21; Pg 21 of 25]
Correction 167:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use impermeable synthetic liner.
[Plans C-21; Pg 21 of 25]
Correction 168:
See Document Markup
Comments:
To be verified thru the Civil application.
[Plans C-21; Pg 21 of 25]
Correction 169:
See Document Markup
Comments:
To be verified thru the Civil application.
[Plans C-22; Pg 22 of 25]
Correction 170:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use impermeable synthetic liner.
[Plans C-22; Pg 22 of 25]
Correction 171:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use abbreviated legal description in title.
[Plans C-22; Pg 22 of 25]
Correction 172:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify - C-23?
[Plans C-23; Pg 23 of 25]
Correction 173:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use abbreviated legal description in title.
[Plans C-23 Pg 23 of 25]
Correction 174:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use abbreviated legal description in title.
[Plans C-25 Pg 25 of 25]
Public Works Collection Review
Approved
08/15/2023
07/11/2023
Reviewer:
Fire Review
Approved
08/15/2023
07/11/2023
Reviewer:
Public Works Water Review
Approved
08/15/2023
07/10/2023
Reviewer: