Review Type |
Outcome |
Est. Completion Date |
Completed |
Public Works Collection Review
|
Approved
|
02/07/2025
|
01/13/2025
|
|
|
Fire Review
|
Approved
|
02/07/2025
|
01/13/2025
|
|
|
Engineering Traffic Review
|
Approved
|
02/07/2025
|
01/10/2025
|
|
|
Planning Review
|
Approved
|
02/07/2025
|
01/10/2025
|
|
|
Engineering Civil Review
|
Failed
|
12/20/2024
|
12/23/2024
|
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Per prior comment-Please show the existing combined detention/wetpond facility serving the offsite properties to the south.
[Storm Report; Pg 15 of 564]
|
|
See Document Markup
Although it is conservative to use the SBUH flow rate (1.25cfs) from the CES report, the Biopod facility might be reduced using WWHM WQ analysis for the Absher properties and the CES post-developed basin surface areas (Note: due to mixing of polluted and non-polluted runoff from the Absher property, all of the runoff generated from the WQ storm event must be treated).
[Storm Report; Pg 419 of 564]
|
|
See Document Markup
Upon resizing of the orifice sizes to match existing release rates, coordinate with callouts on Sheet C4.10.
[Storm Report; Pg 429 of 564]
|
|
See Document Markup
Recalculate values for units (area of orifice used in these flow values was in square inches rather than square feet).
[Storm Report; Pg 429 of 564]
|
|
See Document Markup
Upon initial evaluation, it appears that a two orifice riser would likely correspond with the stage-storage-discharge values of the original facility.
[Storm Report; Pg 429 of 564]
|
|
See Document Markup
Per prior comment-"Notes should also reflect pervious concrete sidewalks with integral curb per Shts C2.01 and C2.02." These notes indicate conventional concrete placement. At a minimum, pervious pavement details should reflect the APWA GSPs created for pervious...see example right.
[Plans; C2.10 of 30]
|
|
See Document Markup
Coordinate phasing delineation with Sheet C1.01.
[Plans; Sht C3.01 of 30]
|
|
See Document Markup
Coordinate phasing delineation with Sheet C1.01.
[Plans; Sht C3.02 of 30]
|
|
See Document Markup
City Standards 204.12 requires check valves on outfalls discharging to streams. Confirm with WDFW that check valves should/should not be used and provide supporting documentation (email, letter, HPA condition, etc.).
[Plans; Sht C4.01 of 30]
|
|
See Document Markup
Add note: "Retaining wall under separate permit."
[Plans; Sht C4.01 of 30]
|
|
See Document Markup
Coordinate phasing delineation with Sheet C1.01.
[Plans; Sht C4.01 of 30]
|
|
See Document Markup
As mentioned in the Storm Report (Pg 419 of 564), it may be possible to reduce the Biopod size using WWHM.
[Plans; C4.02 of 30]
|
|
See Document Markup
Upon further consideration, remove trash rack callout at this location (8in pipe and conveys stream).
[Plans; Sht C4.02 of 30]
|
|
See Document Markup
City Standards 204.12 requires check valves on outfalls discharging to streams. Confirm with WDFW that check valves should/should not be used and provide supporting documentation (email, letter, HPA condition, etc.).
[Plans; Sht C4.02 of 30]
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-Inlet IE does not agree w pipe slope btwn CB45 and WQ8.
[Plans; Sht C4.02 of 30]
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-callout location. (CB46?)
[Plans; Sht C4.02 of 30]
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout pipe IE.
[Plans; Sht C4.02 of 30]
|
|
See Document Markup
Add note: "Retaining wall under separate permit."
[Plans; Sht C4.02 of 30]
|
|
See Document Markup
SDCO#F3 info missing from structure table.
[Plans; Sht C4.02 of 30]
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout "Control Structure" on plan.
[Plans; Sht C4.02 of 30]
|
|
See Document Markup
Coordinate phasing delineation with Sheet C1.01.
[Plans; Sht C4.02 of 30]
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout pipe IE.
[Plans; Sht C4.03 of 30]
|
|
See Document Markup
Please add "Phase 1".
[Plans; Sht C4.03 of 30]
|
|
See Document Markup
Clarify-"Detail to the right"? (4/C4.03?)
[Plans; Sht C4.04 of 30]
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-callout location.
[Plans; Sht C4.04 of 30]
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-callout location.
[Plans; Sht C4.04 of 30]
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout pipe IE.
[Plans; Sht C4.04 of 30]
|
|
See Document Markup
Coord. w Storm Report (0.5" dia noted).
[Plans; Sht C4.10 of 30]
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-68.63? (physical elevation of the orifice in the sump).
[Plans; Sht C4.10 of 30]
|
|
See Document Markup
Coord. w Storm Report (El. 71.83?).
[Plans; Sht C4.10 of 30]
|
|
See Document Markup
Coord. w Storm Report (El. 72.37?).
[Plans; Sht C4.10 of 30]
|
|
See Document Markup
Coord. w Storm Report (0.875" dia noted).
[Plans; Sht C4.10 of 30]
|
|
See Document Markup
Coord. w Storm Report (0.875" dia noted).
[Plans; Sht C4.10 of 30]
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-76.83 per CB46.
[Plans; Sht C4.10 of 30]
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-CB46?
[Plans; Sht C4.10 of 30]
|
|
See Document Markup
Coordinate with revised orifice sizing-see comments in Storm Report (Pg 429 of 564).
[Plans; Sht C4.14 of 30]
|
|
See Document Markup
Coordinate phasing delineation with Sheet C1.01.
[Plans; Sht C5.01 of 30]
|
|
See Document Markup
Coordinate phasing delineation with Sheet C1.01.
[Plans; Sht C5.01 of 30]
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout root barrier for any trees or woody plantings within 3ft of an underground utility (Typ).
[Landscape Plans; Pg L1.1 of 7]
|
|
See Document Markup
Per prior correspondence with AHBL, release rates of the existing storm pond (serving the upstream Absher property) shall be maintained between the 10yr and 100yr mitigated flow rates. See MHigginson email dated 10-02-24. Provide TESC riser and storage criteria for the contractor's use while the existing storm pond is being replaced.
[Storm Report; Pg 499 of 564]
|
|
See Document Markup
Per prior correspondence with AHBL, release rates of the existing storm pond (serving the upstream Absher property) shall be maintained between the 10yr and 100yr mitigated flow rates. See MHigginson email dated 10-02-24. Provide TESC riser and storage criteria for the contractor's use while the existing storm pond is being replaced.
[Plans; Sht C1.01 of 30]
|
|
See Document Markup
If check valve not desired by WDFW, provide trash rack per City Stds 204.12(1). (Assuming the outlet is not fully encased in the rock, and/or the outlet will be exposed over time).
[Plans; Sht C4.01 of 30]
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide confirmation from WDFW that check valves should/should not be used (AHBL's response/concerns acknowledged).
[Plans; Sht C4.01 of 30]
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify whether a structure should be added near the pipe inlet for ease of maintenance.
[Plans; Sht C4.02 of 30]
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-South?
[Plans; Sheet C4.02 of 30]
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-North?
[Plans; Sheet C4.02 of 30]
|
|
See Document Markup
If check valve not desired by WDFW, provide trash rack per City Stds 204.12(1). (Assuming the outlet is not fully encased in the rock, and/or the outlet will be exposed over time).
[Plans; Sht C4.02 of 30]
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide confirmation from WDFW that check valves should/should not be used (AHBL's response/concerns acknowledged).
[Plans; Sht C4.02 of 30]
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-South?
[Plans; Sheet C4.12 of 30]
|
Public Works Streets Review
|
VOID
|
12/20/2024
|
12/23/2024
|
|
|
Engineering Traffic Review
|
Approved
|
12/20/2024
|
12/11/2024
|
|
|
Fire Review
|
Approved
|
12/20/2024
|
12/10/2024
|
|
|
Public Works Water Review
|
Approved
|
12/20/2024
|
12/03/2024
|
|
|
Planning Review
|
Approved
|
12/20/2024
|
12/03/2024
|
|
|
Public Works Collection Review
|
Approved
|
12/20/2024
|
12/02/2024
|
|
|
Engineering Civil Review
|
Failed
|
11/01/2024
|
10/31/2024
|
|
|
|
See Document Markup
-Prior to Occupancy, provide an executed copy of an easement or agreement allowing the properties to the south of the project to discharge into R-Tank 4 on the East Town Crossing property.
-The easement or agreement shall clearly identify the entity responsible for maintenance of R-Tank 4, water quality facilities, and associated conveyance system.
[Storm Report; Pg 1 of 564]
|
|
See Document Markup
Add discussion about replacing the existing combined detention/wetpond facility serving the offsite properties to the south.
[Storm Report; Pg 7 of 564]
|
|
See Document Markup
Where is this shown in the project documents? PH1 Onsite indicates a temp outlet with pumping and references a fish screen. PH2 CFG indicates the control structure, 12in pipe outlet, but no riser information, no fish screen callout, and no Mirafi wrapped channel. There is a TESC outlet protection detail, but nothing shown for the permanent installation. This set of plans does not show the PH1 outfall at all. Please clarify.
[Storm Report; Pg 7 of 564]
|
|
See Document Markup
See WQ comments on Page 419 of 564.
[Storm Report; Pg 8 of 564]
|
|
See Document Markup
Please show the existing combined detention/wetpond facility serving the offsite properties to the south.
[Storm Report; Pg 15 of 564]
|
|
See Document Markup
At time of closeout, the final O&M manual shall use the BMP descriptions and maintenance criteria from the "City of Puyallup Site Management Plan for Stormwater Operations and Maintenance."
[Storm Report; Pg 240 of 564]
|
|
See Document Markup
Since the proposed WQ biopods are based on flow capacity rather than volume, the City would accept sizing the WQ facility using WWHM and the post-developed conditions of the original "2004 Shaw Road Development". This likely will reduce the quantity of biopods needed for compliance.
[Storm Report; Pg 419 of 564]
|
|
See Document Markup
See WQ comments on planset, Sht C4.02.
[Storm Report; Pg 419 of 564]
|
|
See Document Markup
Revise-min. orifice size is 0.5in.
[Storm Report; Pg 429 pf 564]
|
|
See Document Markup
Upsize outlet pipe to 12in per City Stds and riser to match.
[Storm Report; Pg 429 pf 564]
|
|
See Document Markup
Typo? (0.5?)
[Storm Report; Pg 429 pf 564]
|
|
See Document Markup
Do not place trees or woody plantings on the R-Tank detention systems or withing 10ft of underground utilities.
[Landscape Plans; Pg L1.0 of 7]
|
|
See Document Markup
Add note restricting construction access to Shaw Road for the duration of the project.
[Plans; C1.10 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Add: "See PRGR20240491".
[Plans; C2.01 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Add: "See PRCCP20240569".
[Plans; C2.01 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify Keynote.
[Plans; C2.02 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Notes should also reflect pervious concrete sidewalks with integral curb per Shts C2.01 and C2.02.
[Plans; C2.10 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Add note: "Subragde preparation shall meet APWA GSP 2-06.3(3) Subgrade for Permeable Pavements".
[Plans; C2.10 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Add: "See PRGR20240491".
[Plans; C3.01 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Add: "See PRCCP20240569".
[Plans; C3.01 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout TW/BW elevations at endpoints and 25ft oc max.
[Plans; Sht C3.01 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Walls are not allowed within the ROW without an approved AMR. If the walls cannot be eliminated, submit an AMR for City Engineer review and approval.
[Plans; C3.01 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Add: "See PRGR20240491".
[Plans; C3.01 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Grading in this area should be directed towards the CB. Revise accordingly.
[Plans; Sht C3.01 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Use Type 2 due to depth.
[Plans; Sht C4.01 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Match crowns per City Stds.
[Plans; Sht C4.01 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Please callout Rim and IE in Structure Table.
[Plans; Sht C4.01 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Readability.
[Plans; Sht C4.01 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Per City Standards 204.4 provide 1ft min cover.
[Plans; Sht C4.02 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Per City Standards 204.4 1ft min cover required. Revise accordingly.
[Plans; Sht C4.02 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Please callout Rim and IE in Structure Table.
[Plans; Sht C4.02 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Clarify-which permit application indicates the culvert wing wall design, wall details, and outfall pad details? (Note: If the existing culvert pipe end will be exposed, city standards require a trash rack).
[Plans; Sht C4.02 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
12in pipe req'd per City Standards.
[Plans; Sht C4.02 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify with Detail 1/C4.13.
[Plans; Sht C4.02 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify Callout (4/C4.10?).
[Plans; Sht C4.02 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
0.5% min slope per City Stds. Revise accordingly.
[Plans; Sht C4.02 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
-Since the proposed WQ biopods are based on flow capacity rather than volume, the City would accept sizing the WQ facility using WWHM and the post-developed conditions of the original "2004 Shaw Road Development". This likely will reduce the quantity of biopods needed for compliance.
- This WQ configuration raises concerns due to the liklihood of the biopods closest to SDCB45 clogging much sooner than the biopods further away from the CB resulting in an unequal and reduced treatment benefit. Similarly, the biopods closest to SDCB45 will receive different flow rate(s) than those further away resulting in an unequal and/or reduced treatment benefit.
-If the above configuration will be the final design, provide a letter from the manufacturer certifying that the proposed design will provide the hydraulic loading rate necessary to treat the incoming water quality design flow rate at SDCB45.
[Plans; Sht C4.02 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Use Type 2 due to depth.
[Plans; Sht C4.03 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Match crowns per City Stds.
[Plans; Sht C4.03 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
0.5% min slope per City Stds. Revise accordingly.
[Plans; Sht C4.03 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout and indicate 25yr WSE for the stream. Ensure no backwater affect for the 25yr conveyance design storm.
[Plans; Sht C4.03 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
12in pipe req'd per City Standards.
[Plans; Sht C4.03 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
See outfall comment on Sht C4.02.
[Plans; Sht C4.03 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
See WQ comments on Sht C4.02.
[Plans; Sht C4.03 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide SDCB45 info.
[Plans; Sht C4.03 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify detail callout (4?)
[Plans; Sht C4.03 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Please label as existing.
[Plans; Sht C4.03 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-SDCB#43?
[Plans; Sht C4.10 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Add City Standard Details:
02.01.05 // 02.01.08 // 02.01.09 // 02.02.03 // 06.01.01 // 06.01.02 // 06.01.03
[Plans; Sht C4.10 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Use 12in pipe per City Standards.
[Plans; Sht C4.10 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Min orifice size is 0.5.
[Plans; Sht C4.10 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Upsize to match outlet pipe.
[Plans; Sht C4.10 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify IE with Sht C4.01 and C4.03.
[Plans; Sht C4.11 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
See WQ comments on Sht C4.02.
[Plans; Sht C4.12 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
CALLOUT-manufactured 30mil (min) impermeable liner to prevent groundwater intrusion.
[Plans; Sht C4.13 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
The required 6inch sediment storarge should be above the stone base layer (but below the detention volume). This was inadvertantly missed on Phase 1, but should be corrected on Phase 2. Revise accordingly.
[Plans; Sht C4.13 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify pipe slope with IE callouts.
[Plans; Sht C5.01of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Readability.
[Plans; Sht C5.01of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Add City Standard Details:
06.01.01 // 06.01.02 // 06.01.03
[Plans; Sht C5.10 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout a 6in tee for the side sewer connection out of the CB.
[Plans; Sht C5.10 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout separation between hydrant and FDC (15' max/10' min).
[Plans; Sht C6.01 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout 3ft clear all around the hydrant and FDC.
[Plans; Sht C6.01 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout DDCVA and PIV.
[Plans; Sht C6.01 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout and show DCVA.
[Plans; Sht C6.01 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Delete.
[Plans; Sht C6.01 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Delete.
[Plans; Sht C6.02 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout and show DCVA.
[Plans; Sht C6.02 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Add City Standard Detail:
06.01.01
[Plans; Sht C6.10 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Delete.
[Plans; Sht C6.11 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Per prior comment-Please show the existing combined detention/wetpond facility serving the offsite properties to the south.
[Storm Report; Pg 15 of 564]
|
|
See Document Markup
Although it is conservative to use the SBUH flow rate (1.25cfs) from the CES report, the Biopod facility might be reduced using WWHM WQ analysis for the Absher properties and the CES post-developed basin surface areas (Note: due to mixing of polluted and non-polluted runoff from the Absher property, all of the runoff generated from the WQ storm event must be treated).
[Storm Report; Pg 419 of 564]
|
|
See Document Markup
Upon resizing of the orifice sizes to match existing release rates, coordinate with callouts on Sheet C4.10.
[Storm Report; Pg 429 of 564]
|
|
See Document Markup
Recalculate values for units (area of orifice used in these flow values was in square inches rather than square feet).
[Storm Report; Pg 429 of 564]
|
|
See Document Markup
Upon initial evaluation, it appears that a two orifice riser would likely correspond with the stage-storage-discharge values of the original facility.
[Storm Report; Pg 429 of 564]
|
|
See Document Markup
Per prior comment-"Notes should also reflect pervious concrete sidewalks with integral curb per Shts C2.01 and C2.02." These notes indicate conventional concrete placement. At a minimum, pervious pavement details should reflect the APWA GSPs created for pervious...see example right.
[Plans; C2.10 of 30]
|
|
See Document Markup
Coordinate phasing delineation with Sheet C1.01.
[Plans; Sht C3.01 of 30]
|
|
See Document Markup
Coordinate phasing delineation with Sheet C1.01.
[Plans; Sht C3.02 of 30]
|
|
See Document Markup
City Standards 204.12 requires check valves on outfalls discharging to streams. Confirm with WDFW that check valves should/should not be used and provide supporting documentation (email, letter, HPA condition, etc.).
[Plans; Sht C4.01 of 30]
|
|
See Document Markup
Add note: "Retaining wall under separate permit."
[Plans; Sht C4.01 of 30]
|
|
See Document Markup
Coordinate phasing delineation with Sheet C1.01.
[Plans; Sht C4.01 of 30]
|
|
See Document Markup
As mentioned in the Storm Report (Pg 419 of 564), it may be possible to reduce the Biopod size using WWHM.
[Plans; C4.02 of 30]
|
|
See Document Markup
Upon further consideration, remove trash rack callout at this location (8in pipe and conveys stream).
[Plans; Sht C4.02 of 30]
|
|
See Document Markup
City Standards 204.12 requires check valves on outfalls discharging to streams. Confirm with WDFW that check valves should/should not be used and provide supporting documentation (email, letter, HPA condition, etc.).
[Plans; Sht C4.02 of 30]
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-Inlet IE does not agree w pipe slope btwn CB45 and WQ8.
[Plans; Sht C4.02 of 30]
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-callout location. (CB46?)
[Plans; Sht C4.02 of 30]
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout pipe IE.
[Plans; Sht C4.02 of 30]
|
|
See Document Markup
Add note: "Retaining wall under separate permit."
[Plans; Sht C4.02 of 30]
|
|
See Document Markup
SDCO#F3 info missing from structure table.
[Plans; Sht C4.02 of 30]
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout "Control Structure" on plan.
[Plans; Sht C4.02 of 30]
|
|
See Document Markup
Coordinate phasing delineation with Sheet C1.01.
[Plans; Sht C4.02 of 30]
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout pipe IE.
[Plans; Sht C4.03 of 30]
|
|
See Document Markup
Please add "Phase 1".
[Plans; Sht C4.03 of 30]
|
|
See Document Markup
Clarify-"Detail to the right"? (4/C4.03?)
[Plans; Sht C4.04 of 30]
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-callout location.
[Plans; Sht C4.04 of 30]
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-callout location.
[Plans; Sht C4.04 of 30]
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout pipe IE.
[Plans; Sht C4.04 of 30]
|
|
See Document Markup
Coord. w Storm Report (0.5" dia noted).
[Plans; Sht C4.10 of 30]
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-68.63? (physical elevation of the orifice in the sump).
[Plans; Sht C4.10 of 30]
|
|
See Document Markup
Coord. w Storm Report (El. 71.83?).
[Plans; Sht C4.10 of 30]
|
|
See Document Markup
Coord. w Storm Report (El. 72.37?).
[Plans; Sht C4.10 of 30]
|
|
See Document Markup
Coord. w Storm Report (0.875" dia noted).
[Plans; Sht C4.10 of 30]
|
|
See Document Markup
Coord. w Storm Report (0.875" dia noted).
[Plans; Sht C4.10 of 30]
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-76.83 per CB46.
[Plans; Sht C4.10 of 30]
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-CB46?
[Plans; Sht C4.10 of 30]
|
|
See Document Markup
Coordinate with revised orifice sizing-see comments in Storm Report (Pg 429 of 564).
[Plans; Sht C4.14 of 30]
|
|
See Document Markup
Coordinate phasing delineation with Sheet C1.01.
[Plans; Sht C5.01 of 30]
|
|
See Document Markup
Coordinate phasing delineation with Sheet C1.01.
[Plans; Sht C5.01 of 30]
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout root barrier for any trees or woody plantings within 3ft of an underground utility (Typ).
[Landscape Plans; Pg L1.1 of 7]
|
Public Works Streets Review
|
VOID
|
11/01/2024
|
10/31/2024
|
|
|
Engineering Traffic Review
|
Approved
|
11/01/2024
|
10/30/2024
|
|
|
Public Works Water Review
|
Approved
|
11/01/2024
|
10/24/2024
|
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Civil C6.01: Show and call out the DCVA downstream of 2-inch water meter.
|
|
See Document Markup
Civil C6.02: Show and call out the DCVA downstream of 2-inch water meter.
|
Planning Review
|
Approved
|
11/01/2024
|
10/22/2024
|
|
|
Fire Review
|
Approved
|
11/01/2024
|
10/15/2024
|
|
|
Public Works Collection Review
|
Approved
|
11/01/2024
|
10/14/2024
|
|
|
Engineering Civil Review
|
Failed
|
07/22/2024
|
07/26/2024
|
|
|
|
See Document Markup
-Prior to Occupancy, provide an executed copy of an easement or agreement allowing the properties to the south of the project to discharge into R-Tank 4 on the East Town Crossing property.
-The easement or agreement shall clearly identify the entity responsible for maintenance of R-Tank 4, water quality facilities, and associated conveyance system.
[Storm Report; Pg 1 of 564]
|
|
See Document Markup
Add discussion about replacing the existing combined detention/wetpond facility serving the offsite properties to the south.
[Storm Report; Pg 7 of 564]
|
|
See Document Markup
Where is this shown in the project documents? PH1 Onsite indicates a temp outlet with pumping and references a fish screen. PH2 CFG indicates the control structure, 12in pipe outlet, but no riser information, no fish screen callout, and no Mirafi wrapped channel. There is a TESC outlet protection detail, but nothing shown for the permanent installation. This set of plans does not show the PH1 outfall at all. Please clarify.
[Storm Report; Pg 7 of 564]
|
|
See Document Markup
See WQ comments on Page 419 of 564.
[Storm Report; Pg 8 of 564]
|
|
See Document Markup
Please show the existing combined detention/wetpond facility serving the offsite properties to the south.
[Storm Report; Pg 15 of 564]
|
|
See Document Markup
At time of closeout, the final O&M manual shall use the BMP descriptions and maintenance criteria from the "City of Puyallup Site Management Plan for Stormwater Operations and Maintenance."
[Storm Report; Pg 240 of 564]
|
|
See Document Markup
Since the proposed WQ biopods are based on flow capacity rather than volume, the City would accept sizing the WQ facility using WWHM and the post-developed conditions of the original "2004 Shaw Road Development". This likely will reduce the quantity of biopods needed for compliance.
[Storm Report; Pg 419 of 564]
|
|
See Document Markup
See WQ comments on planset, Sht C4.02.
[Storm Report; Pg 419 of 564]
|
|
See Document Markup
Revise-min. orifice size is 0.5in.
[Storm Report; Pg 429 pf 564]
|
|
See Document Markup
Upsize outlet pipe to 12in per City Stds and riser to match.
[Storm Report; Pg 429 pf 564]
|
|
See Document Markup
Typo? (0.5?)
[Storm Report; Pg 429 pf 564]
|
|
See Document Markup
Do not place trees or woody plantings on the R-Tank detention systems or withing 10ft of underground utilities.
[Landscape Plans; Pg L1.0 of 7]
|
|
See Document Markup
Add note restricting construction access to Shaw Road for the duration of the project.
[Plans; C1.10 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Add: "See PRGR20240491".
[Plans; C2.01 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Add: "See PRCCP20240569".
[Plans; C2.01 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify Keynote.
[Plans; C2.02 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Notes should also reflect pervious concrete sidewalks with integral curb per Shts C2.01 and C2.02.
[Plans; C2.10 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Add note: "Subragde preparation shall meet APWA GSP 2-06.3(3) Subgrade for Permeable Pavements".
[Plans; C2.10 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Add: "See PRGR20240491".
[Plans; C3.01 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Add: "See PRCCP20240569".
[Plans; C3.01 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout TW/BW elevations at endpoints and 25ft oc max.
[Plans; Sht C3.01 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Walls are not allowed within the ROW without an approved AMR. If the walls cannot be eliminated, submit an AMR for City Engineer review and approval.
[Plans; C3.01 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Add: "See PRGR20240491".
[Plans; C3.01 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Grading in this area should be directed towards the CB. Revise accordingly.
[Plans; Sht C3.01 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Use Type 2 due to depth.
[Plans; Sht C4.01 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Match crowns per City Stds.
[Plans; Sht C4.01 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Please callout Rim and IE in Structure Table.
[Plans; Sht C4.01 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Readability.
[Plans; Sht C4.01 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Per City Standards 204.4 provide 1ft min cover.
[Plans; Sht C4.02 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Per City Standards 204.4 1ft min cover required. Revise accordingly.
[Plans; Sht C4.02 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Please callout Rim and IE in Structure Table.
[Plans; Sht C4.02 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Clarify-which permit application indicates the culvert wing wall design, wall details, and outfall pad details? (Note: If the existing culvert pipe end will be exposed, city standards require a trash rack).
[Plans; Sht C4.02 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
12in pipe req'd per City Standards.
[Plans; Sht C4.02 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify with Detail 1/C4.13.
[Plans; Sht C4.02 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify Callout (4/C4.10?).
[Plans; Sht C4.02 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
0.5% min slope per City Stds. Revise accordingly.
[Plans; Sht C4.02 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
-Since the proposed WQ biopods are based on flow capacity rather than volume, the City would accept sizing the WQ facility using WWHM and the post-developed conditions of the original "2004 Shaw Road Development". This likely will reduce the quantity of biopods needed for compliance.
- This WQ configuration raises concerns due to the liklihood of the biopods closest to SDCB45 clogging much sooner than the biopods further away from the CB resulting in an unequal and reduced treatment benefit. Similarly, the biopods closest to SDCB45 will receive different flow rate(s) than those further away resulting in an unequal and/or reduced treatment benefit.
-If the above configuration will be the final design, provide a letter from the manufacturer certifying that the proposed design will provide the hydraulic loading rate necessary to treat the incoming water quality design flow rate at SDCB45.
[Plans; Sht C4.02 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Use Type 2 due to depth.
[Plans; Sht C4.03 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Match crowns per City Stds.
[Plans; Sht C4.03 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
0.5% min slope per City Stds. Revise accordingly.
[Plans; Sht C4.03 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout and indicate 25yr WSE for the stream. Ensure no backwater affect for the 25yr conveyance design storm.
[Plans; Sht C4.03 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
12in pipe req'd per City Standards.
[Plans; Sht C4.03 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
See outfall comment on Sht C4.02.
[Plans; Sht C4.03 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
See WQ comments on Sht C4.02.
[Plans; Sht C4.03 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide SDCB45 info.
[Plans; Sht C4.03 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify detail callout (4?)
[Plans; Sht C4.03 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Please label as existing.
[Plans; Sht C4.03 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-SDCB#43?
[Plans; Sht C4.10 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Add City Standard Details:
02.01.05 // 02.01.08 // 02.01.09 // 02.02.03 // 06.01.01 // 06.01.02 // 06.01.03
[Plans; Sht C4.10 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Use 12in pipe per City Standards.
[Plans; Sht C4.10 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Min orifice size is 0.5.
[Plans; Sht C4.10 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Upsize to match outlet pipe.
[Plans; Sht C4.10 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify IE with Sht C4.01 and C4.03.
[Plans; Sht C4.11 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
See WQ comments on Sht C4.02.
[Plans; Sht C4.12 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
CALLOUT-manufactured 30mil (min) impermeable liner to prevent groundwater intrusion.
[Plans; Sht C4.13 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
The required 6inch sediment storarge should be above the stone base layer (but below the detention volume). This was inadvertantly missed on Phase 1, but should be corrected on Phase 2. Revise accordingly.
[Plans; Sht C4.13 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify pipe slope with IE callouts.
[Plans; Sht C5.01of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Readability.
[Plans; Sht C5.01of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Add City Standard Details:
06.01.01 // 06.01.02 // 06.01.03
[Plans; Sht C5.10 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout a 6in tee for the side sewer connection out of the CB.
[Plans; Sht C5.10 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout separation between hydrant and FDC (15' max/10' min).
[Plans; Sht C6.01 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout 3ft clear all around the hydrant and FDC.
[Plans; Sht C6.01 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout DDCVA and PIV.
[Plans; Sht C6.01 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout and show DCVA.
[Plans; Sht C6.01 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Delete.
[Plans; Sht C6.01 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Delete.
[Plans; Sht C6.02 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout and show DCVA.
[Plans; Sht C6.02 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Add City Standard Detail:
06.01.01
[Plans; Sht C6.10 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Delete.
[Plans; Sht C6.11 of 28]
|
Public Works Streets Review
|
Approved
|
07/22/2024
|
07/24/2024
|
|
|
Engineering Traffic Review
|
Approved
|
07/22/2024
|
07/19/2024
|
|
|
Public Works Water Review
|
Failed
|
07/22/2024
|
07/16/2024
|
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Civil C6.01: Show and call out the DCVA downstream of 2-inch water meter.
|
|
See Document Markup
Civil C6.02: Show and call out the DCVA downstream of 2-inch water meter.
|
Fire Review
|
Approved
|
07/22/2024
|
07/16/2024
|
|
|
Public Works Collection Review
|
Approved
|
07/22/2024
|
06/25/2024
|
|
|
Planning Review
|
Approved
|
07/22/2024
|
06/25/2024
|
|
|
Engineering Civil Review
|
Pending
|
02/07/2025
|
|
|
|
Public Works Streets Review
|
Pending
|
02/07/2025
|
|
|
|
Public Works Water Review
|
Pending
|
02/07/2025
|
|
|
|