Review Type |
Outcome |
Est. Completion Date |
Completed |
Engineering Civil Review
|
Failed
|
07/22/2024
|
07/26/2024
|
|
|
|
See Document Markup
-Prior to Occupancy, provide an executed copy of an easement or agreement allowing the properties to the south of the project to discharge into R-Tank 4 on the East Town Crossing property.
-The easement or agreement shall clearly identify the entity responsible for maintenance of R-Tank 4, water quality facilities, and associated conveyance system.
[Storm Report; Pg 1 of 564]
|
|
See Document Markup
Add discussion about replacing the existing combined detention/wetpond facility serving the offsite properties to the south.
[Storm Report; Pg 7 of 564]
|
|
See Document Markup
Where is this shown in the project documents? PH1 Onsite indicates a temp outlet with pumping and references a fish screen. PH2 CFG indicates the control structure, 12in pipe outlet, but no riser information, no fish screen callout, and no Mirafi wrapped channel. There is a TESC outlet protection detail, but nothing shown for the permanent installation. This set of plans does not show the PH1 outfall at all. Please clarify.
[Storm Report; Pg 7 of 564]
|
|
See Document Markup
See WQ comments on Page 419 of 564.
[Storm Report; Pg 8 of 564]
|
|
See Document Markup
Please show the existing combined detention/wetpond facility serving the offsite properties to the south.
[Storm Report; Pg 15 of 564]
|
|
See Document Markup
At time of closeout, the final O&M manual shall use the BMP descriptions and maintenance criteria from the "City of Puyallup Site Management Plan for Stormwater Operations and Maintenance."
[Storm Report; Pg 240 of 564]
|
|
See Document Markup
Since the proposed WQ biopods are based on flow capacity rather than volume, the City would accept sizing the WQ facility using WWHM and the post-developed conditions of the original "2004 Shaw Road Development". This likely will reduce the quantity of biopods needed for compliance.
[Storm Report; Pg 419 of 564]
|
|
See Document Markup
See WQ comments on planset, Sht C4.02.
[Storm Report; Pg 419 of 564]
|
|
See Document Markup
Revise-min. orifice size is 0.5in.
[Storm Report; Pg 429 pf 564]
|
|
See Document Markup
Upsize outlet pipe to 12in per City Stds and riser to match.
[Storm Report; Pg 429 pf 564]
|
|
See Document Markup
Typo? (0.5?)
[Storm Report; Pg 429 pf 564]
|
|
See Document Markup
Do not place trees or woody plantings on the R-Tank detention systems or withing 10ft of underground utilities.
[Landscape Plans; Pg L1.0 of 7]
|
|
See Document Markup
Add note restricting construction access to Shaw Road for the duration of the project.
[Plans; C1.10 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Add: "See PRGR20240491".
[Plans; C2.01 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Add: "See PRCCP20240569".
[Plans; C2.01 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify Keynote.
[Plans; C2.02 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Notes should also reflect pervious concrete sidewalks with integral curb per Shts C2.01 and C2.02.
[Plans; C2.10 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Add note: "Subragde preparation shall meet APWA GSP 2-06.3(3) Subgrade for Permeable Pavements".
[Plans; C2.10 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Add: "See PRGR20240491".
[Plans; C3.01 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Add: "See PRCCP20240569".
[Plans; C3.01 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout TW/BW elevations at endpoints and 25ft oc max.
[Plans; Sht C3.01 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Walls are not allowed within the ROW without an approved AMR. If the walls cannot be eliminated, submit an AMR for City Engineer review and approval.
[Plans; C3.01 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Add: "See PRGR20240491".
[Plans; C3.01 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Grading in this area should be directed towards the CB. Revise accordingly.
[Plans; Sht C3.01 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Use Type 2 due to depth.
[Plans; Sht C4.01 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Match crowns per City Stds.
[Plans; Sht C4.01 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Please callout Rim and IE in Structure Table.
[Plans; Sht C4.01 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Readability.
[Plans; Sht C4.01 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Per City Standards 204.4 provide 1ft min cover.
[Plans; Sht C4.02 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Per City Standards 204.4 1ft min cover required. Revise accordingly.
[Plans; Sht C4.02 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Please callout Rim and IE in Structure Table.
[Plans; Sht C4.02 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Clarify-which permit application indicates the culvert wing wall design, wall details, and outfall pad details? (Note: If the existing culvert pipe end will be exposed, city standards require a trash rack).
[Plans; Sht C4.02 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
12in pipe req'd per City Standards.
[Plans; Sht C4.02 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify with Detail 1/C4.13.
[Plans; Sht C4.02 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify Callout (4/C4.10?).
[Plans; Sht C4.02 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
0.5% min slope per City Stds. Revise accordingly.
[Plans; Sht C4.02 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
-Since the proposed WQ biopods are based on flow capacity rather than volume, the City would accept sizing the WQ facility using WWHM and the post-developed conditions of the original "2004 Shaw Road Development". This likely will reduce the quantity of biopods needed for compliance.
- This WQ configuration raises concerns due to the liklihood of the biopods closest to SDCB45 clogging much sooner than the biopods further away from the CB resulting in an unequal and reduced treatment benefit. Similarly, the biopods closest to SDCB45 will receive different flow rate(s) than those further away resulting in an unequal and/or reduced treatment benefit.
-If the above configuration will be the final design, provide a letter from the manufacturer certifying that the proposed design will provide the hydraulic loading rate necessary to treat the incoming water quality design flow rate at SDCB45.
[Plans; Sht C4.02 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Use Type 2 due to depth.
[Plans; Sht C4.03 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Match crowns per City Stds.
[Plans; Sht C4.03 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
0.5% min slope per City Stds. Revise accordingly.
[Plans; Sht C4.03 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout and indicate 25yr WSE for the stream. Ensure no backwater affect for the 25yr conveyance design storm.
[Plans; Sht C4.03 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
12in pipe req'd per City Standards.
[Plans; Sht C4.03 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
See outfall comment on Sht C4.02.
[Plans; Sht C4.03 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
See WQ comments on Sht C4.02.
[Plans; Sht C4.03 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide SDCB45 info.
[Plans; Sht C4.03 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify detail callout (4?)
[Plans; Sht C4.03 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Please label as existing.
[Plans; Sht C4.03 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-SDCB#43?
[Plans; Sht C4.10 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Add City Standard Details:
02.01.05 // 02.01.08 // 02.01.09 // 02.02.03 // 06.01.01 // 06.01.02 // 06.01.03
[Plans; Sht C4.10 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Use 12in pipe per City Standards.
[Plans; Sht C4.10 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Min orifice size is 0.5.
[Plans; Sht C4.10 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Upsize to match outlet pipe.
[Plans; Sht C4.10 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify IE with Sht C4.01 and C4.03.
[Plans; Sht C4.11 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
See WQ comments on Sht C4.02.
[Plans; Sht C4.12 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
CALLOUT-manufactured 30mil (min) impermeable liner to prevent groundwater intrusion.
[Plans; Sht C4.13 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
The required 6inch sediment storarge should be above the stone base layer (but below the detention volume). This was inadvertantly missed on Phase 1, but should be corrected on Phase 2. Revise accordingly.
[Plans; Sht C4.13 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify pipe slope with IE callouts.
[Plans; Sht C5.01of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Readability.
[Plans; Sht C5.01of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Add City Standard Details:
06.01.01 // 06.01.02 // 06.01.03
[Plans; Sht C5.10 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout a 6in tee for the side sewer connection out of the CB.
[Plans; Sht C5.10 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout separation between hydrant and FDC (15' max/10' min).
[Plans; Sht C6.01 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout 3ft clear all around the hydrant and FDC.
[Plans; Sht C6.01 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout DDCVA and PIV.
[Plans; Sht C6.01 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout and show DCVA.
[Plans; Sht C6.01 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Delete.
[Plans; Sht C6.01 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Delete.
[Plans; Sht C6.02 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout and show DCVA.
[Plans; Sht C6.02 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Add City Standard Detail:
06.01.01
[Plans; Sht C6.10 of 28]
|
|
See Document Markup
Delete.
[Plans; Sht C6.11 of 28]
|
|
|
Public Works Streets Review
|
Approved
|
07/22/2024
|
07/24/2024
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Traffic Review
|
Approved
|
07/22/2024
|
07/19/2024
|
|
|
|
Frontage, lighting, signals, and striping on phase 1 civil plans
|
Public Works Water Review
|
Failed
|
07/22/2024
|
07/16/2024
|
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Civil C6.01: Show and call out the DCVA downstream of 2-inch water meter.
|
|
See Document Markup
Civil C6.02: Show and call out the DCVA downstream of 2-inch water meter.
|
|
|
Fire Review
|
Approved
|
07/22/2024
|
07/16/2024
|
|
|
|
|
Public Works Collection Review
|
Approved
|
07/22/2024
|
06/25/2024
|
|
|
|
|
Planning Review
|
Approved
|
07/22/2024
|
06/25/2024
|
|
|
|
|