Review Type
Outcome
Est. Completion Date
Completed
Engineering Civil Review
Approved
06/18/2024
06/06/2024
Reviewer:
Corrections:
Correction 1:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide auto-turn analysis for the largest anticipated vehicle that would access the site to ensure adequate radii an dimensioning. Coordinate with Shaw Road frontage plans.
[Plans C-3; Pg 3 of 45]
Correction 2:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-Existing storm pond serving properties to the south to be protected and remain in service until Phase 2.
[Plans Sht C3.4; Pg 13 of 63]
Correction 3:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add Fire Code Official approval block to the Water plan sheets. (Ref. City Stds Section 1.4.
[Plans C-14; Pg 14 of 45]
Correction 4:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Rotate hydrant to face drive aisle.
[Plans C-15; Pg 15 of 45]
Correction 5:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Due to high groundwater, use impermeable synthetic liner.
[Plans C-37; Pg 36 of 45]
Planning Review
Approved
06/18/2024
05/31/2024
Reviewer:
Corrections:
Correction 1:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
SEPA CONDITIONS: SEPA mitigation measures require implementation of a requirement for off-site safe routes to schools improvements. See P-21-0034 SEPA (June 27, 2023). Please provide those plans for further review and agency consultation.
UPDATED 03/04/24: No response to this comment located. Assumed this will be a separate off-site civil permit submittal.
UPDATED 04/30/24: No response to this comment located. Assumed this will be a separate off-site civil permit submittal. Please respond.
Correction 2:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
LANDSCAPE 03/04/24: Daffodils are required throughout site design frontages, consistent with VMS section 7.3. All perimeter landscape yard areas required by PMC 20.58 shall include Narcissus trumpet 'King Alfred' or ‘Dutch Master’ in the first 3’ of landscape areas behind the property line, planted at 6” on-center. Not located on the landscape plan sheets.
LANDSCAPE 03/04/24: Provide bench seating and other pedestrian features on the landscape plan sheets in the street corner plaza. This is required by PMC 20.30.037, and was previously noted. Providing bench seating and ped scale lighting will meet the min. requirements.
LANDSCAPE 04/30/24: Items from March 04 review still outstanding, not located on plan sheets or in comment response.
Correction 3:
Miscellaneous Planning Correction
Comments:
LANDSCAPE 05/29/24: Sheet 6.02 shows the water line appx. 13' back of walk in the area between the parking lot and Shaw Road just north of buildings G and H. No street trees are shown on the landscape plan sheet, although enough space is available to place trees 10' from the water line. Please add street trees.
LANDSCAPE 05/29/24: Sheet L1.4 shows a large area with no landscaping between the back of walk and the landscaping near the drive thru lane. Sheet C6.01 shows a water line in this area. There are limitations on trees close to water lines (no closer than 10'); however groundcovers and shrubs may be placed within 2' of the water line location. Please add additional evergreen shrub masses to this area and throughout the bermed area between the drive thru and the back of walk to create a more continuous screen of landscape materials. Review of the plant types shows that there are some lower growing shrubs and grasses - however, there is not enough of a continuous line of evergreen material to meet the drive thru screening requirements.
LANDSCAPE 05/29/24: Please provide the specs for the screening fence shown along the back of walk near the commercial parking lot on Shaw Road. How tall is this fence, what material is it, etc.?
Engineering Traffic Review
Approved
06/18/2024
05/30/2024
Reviewer:
Fire Review
Approved
06/18/2024
05/30/2024
Reviewer:
Corrections:
Correction 1:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
1. The water plans are different then what was originally drawn on preliminary site plan. Apply previous notes to Civils. Email on 2/7/23 from Phil Becker acknowledging these requirements and provided a site plan with new layout.
2. Do not block Fire Hydrants, or F.D.C's with parking stalls. Move all blocked Fire Hydrants, and F.D.C's into parking islands.
3. All F.D.C's are required to be within 10-15' of a Fire Hydrant.
4. Provide fire turn-around dimensions and radiuses.
5. Provide all fire lane widths and radiuses. All fire lanes are required to be 26' wide.
6. Provide auto-turn analysis.
7. Provide Riser Room locations with direct access to side walk.
8. Provide Fire Lane / No Parking Sign layout with painted curbs. Temporary Fire Truck turn-around will require No Parking Signs and painted curb.
Correction 2:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
1. Provide all fire lane widths and radiuses. All fire lanes are required to be 26' wide. Temporary access on Pioneer will be required to be a 26' width. Future BLD E does not have a width called out. BLD T.I. requires a 26' fire lane in front. Building G, and H do not have a fire lane width call out on the North side.
2. Confirm that all storm vaults in the fire lanes are rated for 75,000lb load minimum load limit per the 2018 IFC.
3. Place all F.D.C's and Fire Hydrants closer to fire lanes in all parking islands. Fire Hydrants are placed to close to the parking stall and require a 36" clear space around them. F.D.C's, Fire Hydrants, and P.I.V's should be set back a minimum of 3' behind all curbs to avoid vehicle impact. If this can not be accomplished, vehicle impact protection "bollards" will be required.
4. Provide temporary fire truck turn-around dimensions per the 2018 IFC.
5. Provide Riser Room locations with direct access to side walk.
6. I do not see this addressed? This is required to have its own sheet, with the size of this project all curbs that are not parking stalls will be required to be painted yellow with white stenciled NO PARKING FIRE LANE. FIRE LANE / NO PARKING signs are required to be set behind curb at 50' intervals. (PMC 16.04.015 Emergency vehicle parking) Provide Fire Lane / No Parking Sign layout with painted curbs. Temporary Fire Truck turn-around will require No Parking Signs and painted curb. Remove all other non fire related items off the page.
Correction 3:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
1. Fire lane plan needs to have the following areas stenciled and painted. See page C2.5 markups.
2. Municipal Code 16.04.015 Emergency vehicle parking. Lanes shall be identified by a 4 inch wide line and block letters 2 feet high, painted in the lane, at 50 foot or such other intervals which the Fire code official determines to be reasonable, stating “Emergency Vehicles Only,” color to be determined by the Fire code official (bright yellow), and by posting of signs stating “Emergency Vehicles Only - No Parking - Violator Vehicles Subject to Impound.” Signs shall be posted on or immediately next to the curb line, or on the building. Signs shall be 12" x 18" and shall have letters and background of contrasting colors, readily readable from at least a 50 foot distance. Signs shall be posted at a minimum no further than 50 feet apart, unless a greater distance is deemed reasonable by the Fire code official, nor shall they be more than 4 feet from the ground unless a greater height is determined necessary by the Fire code official.
3. Confirm that all storm vaults in the fire lanes are rated for 75,000lb load minimum load limit per the 2018 IFC.
4. Confirm placement of FDC's and Fire Hydrants have a 36" clear space around them. F.D.C's, Fire Hydrants, and P.I.V's should be set back a minimum of 3' behind all curbs to avoid vehicle impact. If this can not be accomplished, vehicle impact protection "bollards" will be required.
5. Riser Room locations have not been found. Show all Riser rooms on the fire lane stripping plan along with Fire Hydrant's and FDC's.
Correction 4:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
Complete a correction response letter stating where and what pages changes were made on.
Correction 5:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
Based off the last G&O water model, the water system will be required to be looped. This will be required to be complete prior to vertical construction. This will not be allowed to be phased.
Public Works Streets Review
Approved
06/18/2024
05/29/2024
Reviewer:
Public Works Water Review
Approved
06/18/2024
05/29/2024
Reviewer:
Corrections:
Correction 1:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Landscape L1.0: No tree within 10-feet of water mains, hydrants, FDC's, PIV's, meters, and back flow protection. Provide 3-foot planting clear zone around hydrants, FDC's, PIV's, meters, and back flow protection.
Correction 2:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub 4-15-2024 Sheet C6.01: The latest hydraulic model on 4-16-2024 shows that a fire hydrant and a fire sprinkler system on a dead-end 8-inch water main cannot provide the 1,500 GPM fire flow required to support this building structure.
Correction 3:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub 4-15-2024 Sheet C6.02: The latest hydraulic model on 4-16-2024 shows that fire hydrants and fire sprinkler systems on a dead-end 8-inch water main cannot provide the 1,500 GPM fire flow required to support these building structures.
Correction 4:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub 4-15-2024 Sheet C6.01: Remove the words 'stainless steel' from this call out.
Correction 5:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.02: There are two old water services on Shaw Road that need to be removed as part of this project. A water main shutdown will need to be scheduled with the Water Division, and the corporation stops will need to be removed off the water main and replaced with brass plugs.
Correction 6:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Landscape L1.0: No irrigation plan is shown. Show irrigation service, size of meter, protected by same size DCVA on Landscape and Civil plans.
Public Works Collection Review
Approved
06/18/2024
05/29/2024
Reviewer:
Fire Review
Failed
05/13/2024
05/08/2024
Reviewer:
Corrections:
Correction 1:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
1. The water plans are different then what was originally drawn on preliminary site plan. Apply previous notes to Civils. Email on 2/7/23 from Phil Becker acknowledging these requirements and provided a site plan with new layout.
2. Do not block Fire Hydrants, or F.D.C's with parking stalls. Move all blocked Fire Hydrants, and F.D.C's into parking islands.
3. All F.D.C's are required to be within 10-15' of a Fire Hydrant.
4. Provide fire turn-around dimensions and radiuses.
5. Provide all fire lane widths and radiuses. All fire lanes are required to be 26' wide.
6. Provide auto-turn analysis.
7. Provide Riser Room locations with direct access to side walk.
8. Provide Fire Lane / No Parking Sign layout with painted curbs. Temporary Fire Truck turn-around will require No Parking Signs and painted curb.
Correction 2:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
1. Provide all fire lane widths and radiuses. All fire lanes are required to be 26' wide. Temporary access on Pioneer will be required to be a 26' width. Future BLD E does not have a width called out. BLD T.I. requires a 26' fire lane in front. Building G, and H do not have a fire lane width call out on the North side.
2. Confirm that all storm vaults in the fire lanes are rated for 75,000lb load minimum load limit per the 2018 IFC.
3. Place all F.D.C's and Fire Hydrants closer to fire lanes in all parking islands. Fire Hydrants are placed to close to the parking stall and require a 36" clear space around them. F.D.C's, Fire Hydrants, and P.I.V's should be set back a minimum of 3' behind all curbs to avoid vehicle impact. If this can not be accomplished, vehicle impact protection "bollards" will be required.
4. Provide temporary fire truck turn-around dimensions per the 2018 IFC.
5. Provide Riser Room locations with direct access to side walk.
6. I do not see this addressed? This is required to have its own sheet, with the size of this project all curbs that are not parking stalls will be required to be painted yellow with white stenciled NO PARKING FIRE LANE. FIRE LANE / NO PARKING signs are required to be set behind curb at 50' intervals. (PMC 16.04.015 Emergency vehicle parking) Provide Fire Lane / No Parking Sign layout with painted curbs. Temporary Fire Truck turn-around will require No Parking Signs and painted curb. Remove all other non fire related items off the page.
Correction 3:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
1. Fire lane plan needs to have the following areas stenciled and painted. See page C2.5 markups.
2. Municipal Code 16.04.015 Emergency vehicle parking. Lanes shall be identified by a 4 inch wide line and block letters 2 feet high, painted in the lane, at 50 foot or such other intervals which the Fire code official determines to be reasonable, stating “Emergency Vehicles Only,” color to be determined by the Fire code official (bright yellow), and by posting of signs stating “Emergency Vehicles Only - No Parking - Violator Vehicles Subject to Impound.” Signs shall be posted on or immediately next to the curb line, or on the building. Signs shall be 12" x 18" and shall have letters and background of contrasting colors, readily readable from at least a 50 foot distance. Signs shall be posted at a minimum no further than 50 feet apart, unless a greater distance is deemed reasonable by the Fire code official, nor shall they be more than 4 feet from the ground unless a greater height is determined necessary by the Fire code official.
3. Confirm that all storm vaults in the fire lanes are rated for 75,000lb load minimum load limit per the 2018 IFC.
4. Confirm placement of FDC's and Fire Hydrants have a 36" clear space around them. F.D.C's, Fire Hydrants, and P.I.V's should be set back a minimum of 3' behind all curbs to avoid vehicle impact. If this can not be accomplished, vehicle impact protection "bollards" will be required.
5. Riser Room locations have not been found. Show all Riser rooms on the fire lane stripping plan along with Fire Hydrant's and FDC's.
Correction 4:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
Complete a correction response letter stating where and what pages changes were made on.
Correction 5:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
Based off the last G&O water model, the water system will be required to be looped. This will be required to be complete prior to vertical construction. This will not be allowed to be phased.
Public Works Collection Review
Approved
05/13/2024
05/06/2024
Reviewer:
Public Works Streets Review
Approved
05/13/2024
05/06/2024
Reviewer:
Corrections:
Correction 1:
Comment
Comments:
echo Traffic comments...
Engineering Traffic Review
Approved
05/13/2024
05/06/2024
Reviewer:
Corrections:
Correction 1:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Occupancy (for all buildings) will not be allowed until phase 2 frontage improvements are completed. There will be no phase 1 occupants. Please update note [Civil 0.0]
Correction 2:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Ramp/truncated dome design do not meet current ADA standards. Please make sure this is addressed in upcoming phase 2 civil design submittal.
[CIVIL - C3.01]
Correction 3:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Ramp/truncated dome design do not meet current ADA standards Please make sure this is addressed in upcoming phase 2 civil design submittal.
[CIVIL - C3.02]
Correction 4:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Please clarify on plans that frontage improvements shown on phase 1 have not been reviewed or approved by the City. Frontage improvements will be provided under separate phase 2 permit (roadway widening, city standard streetlighting, striping, signalization, signage, curb/gutter/sidewalk, reduced speed school zone, etc.)
[CIVIL - C3.01]
Correction 5:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Include note that specifically restricts construction access from Shaw Rd.
[Plans C1.1; Pg 3 of 63]
Correction 6:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Signal work will be completed under phase 2. No access via Shaw Rd for phase 1. Provide note on plans. See conditions for more details.
[Plans C2.1; Pg 4 of 63]
Engineering Civil Review
Approved
05/13/2024
05/02/2024
Reviewer:
Corrections:
Correction 1:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide auto-turn analysis for the largest anticipated vehicle that would access the site to ensure adequate radii an dimensioning. Coordinate with Shaw Road frontage plans.
[Plans C-3; Pg 3 of 45]
Correction 2:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add Fire Code Official approval block to the Water plan sheets. (Ref. City Stds Section 1.4.
[Plans C-14; Pg 14 of 45]
Correction 3:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Rotate hydrant to face drive aisle.
[Plans C-15; Pg 15 of 45]
Correction 4:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Due to high groundwater, use impermeable synthetic liner.
[Plans C-37; Pg 36 of 45]
Correction 5:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-Existing storm pond serving properties to the south to be protected and remain in service until Phase 2.
[Plans Sht C3.4; Pg 13 of 63]
Correction 6:
See Document Markup
Comments:
PROVIDE-2yr and 10yr water surface elevations on the cross section.
[Plans Sht C4.11; Pg 24 of 63]
Correction 7:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Legibility.
[Plans Sht C4.11; Pg 24 of 63]
Correction 8:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add: "along the Pioneer Way ditch, then the main stem of Deer Creek before discharging" to the main body of the Puyallup River...or similar language.
[Storm Report; Pg 8 of 821]
Correction 9:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add: "then Deer Creek,"
[Storm Report; Pg 9 of 821]
Correction 10:
See Document Markup
Comments:
FYI Only- 3.20 vs 3.00.
[Storm Report; Pg 17 of 821]
Correction 11:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-Basin 4 total; The quantity is less than last submittal, but the amount of area actually increased with the Phase 2 addition.
[Storm Report; Pg 713 of 821]
Correction 12:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-29,400sf ( 0.67ac).
[Storm Report; Pg 713 of 821]
Correction 13:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-Basin 4 Inputs; see comments on WQ Basin Map, Pg 713.
[Storm Report; Pg 714 of 821]
Correction 14:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per prior comment, coordinate with riser geometry, Sht C4.07. Per ACF cut-sheets, bottom of storage is El. 68.40...for 5.87ft of storage, riser crest would be El. 74.27.
[Storm Report; Pg 719 of 821]
Correction 15:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per prior comment, shouldn't this be El. 100.00 which is the bottom of storage and the invert of the outlet pipe? This elevation places the orifce on the control riser tee.
[Storm Report; Pg 720 of 821]
Correction 16:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-coordinate with riser geometry, Sht C4.07. Bottom of storage is El. 68.40 + 4.25ft = El. 72.65.
[Storm Report; Pg 719 of 821]
Correction 17:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Please emphasize the limits of the regulated floodplain for clarity (per the LOMR, Effective September 8, 2022).
[Plans Sht C3.01; Pg 11 of 53]
Correction 18:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per prior comment- callout Rim Elevation.
[Plans Sht C3.02; Pg 12 of 53]
Correction 19:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Please emphasize the limits of the regulated floodplain for clarity (per the LOMR, Effective September 8, 2022).
[Plans Sht C3.03; Pg 13 of 53]
Correction 20:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Please emphasize the limits of the regulated floodplain for clarity (per the LOMR, Effective September 8, 2022).
[Plans Sht C3.04; Pg 14 of 53]
Correction 21:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per prior comment: RELOCATE-Phase line to top of pond.
[Plans Sht C3.04; Pg 14 of 53]
Correction 22:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per prior comment: CALLOUT-Existing storm pond serving properties to the south to be protected and remain in service until Phase 2.
[Plans Sht C3.04; Pg 14 of 53]
Correction 23:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per prior comment: CALLOUT-to protect existing storm drain serving properties to the south.
[Plans Sht C3.04; Pg 14 of 53]
Correction 24:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-reference.
[Plans Sht C4.01; Pg 15 of 53]
Correction 25:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-reference.
[Plans Sht C4.02; Pg 16 of 53]
Correction 26:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-reference.
[Plans Sht C4.02; Pg 16 of 53]
Correction 27:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-reference.
[Plans Sht C4.02; Pg 16 of 53]
Correction 28:
See Document Markup
Comments:
FYI- structure info called out on Sht C4.04.
[Plans Sht C4.02; Pg 16 of 53]
Correction 29:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-Invert vs pipe slope.
[Plans Sht C4.02; Pg 16 of 53]
Correction 30:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-Pipe slope vs invert.
[Plans Sht C4.02; Pg 16 of 53]
Correction 31:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per prior comment-Provide utility crossing information.
[Plans Sht C4.02; Pg 16 of 53]
Correction 32:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per prior comment-Provide utility crossing information.
[Plans Sht C4.02; Pg 16 of 53]
Correction 33:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-These are RTank 3 values and do not agree with the ACF RTank 2 elevations.
[Plans Sht C4.02; Pg 16 of 53]
Correction 34:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-Is it necessary to have such a large pipe into and out of the control structure?
[Plans Sht C4.02; Pg 16 of 53]
Correction 35:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per prior comment-Provide utility crossing information.
[Plans Sht C4.03; Pg 17 of 53]
Correction 36:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CONFIRM-Type 2 structure req'd.
[Plans Sht C4.03; Pg 17 of 53]
Correction 37:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-reference.
[Plans Sht C4.04; Pg 18 of 53]
Correction 38:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-reference.
[Plans Sht C4.04; Pg 18 of 53]
Correction 39:
See Document Markup
Comments:
FYI- structure not shown on this sheet. Called out on Sht C4.02.
[Plans Sht C4.04; Pg 18 of 53]
Correction 40:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CLARIFY-readability.
[Plans Sht C4.04; Pg 18 of 53]
Correction 41:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-Ethafoam crossing per 3/C6.05.
[Plans Sht C4.05; Pg 19 of 53]
Correction 42:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-Ethafoam crossing per 3/C6.05.
[Plans Sht C4.05; Pg 19 of 53]
Correction 43:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-Ethafoam crossing per 3/C6.05.
[Plans Sht C4.05; Pg 19 of 53]
Correction 44:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-reference.
[Plans Sht C4.06; Pg 20 of 53]
Correction 45:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-Ethafoam crossing per 3/C6.05.
[Plans Sht C4.06; Pg 20 of 53]
Correction 46:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-Ethafoam crossing per 3/C6.05.
[Plans Sht C4.06; Pg 20 of 53]
Correction 47:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-"SDCB01".
[Plans Sht C4.07; Pg 21 of 53]
Correction 48:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per prior comment, shouldn't this be El. 67.40 which is the bottom of storage and the invert of the outlet pipe? El. 67.65 would place the orifce on the tee of the control riser. [Plans Sht C4.07; Pg 21 of 53]
Correction 49:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-Per prior comment, per calcs there is 5.87ft of storage which places the riser crest at El. 74.27 (Bottom of Storage El. 68.40 + storage depth of 5.87).
[Plans Sht C4.07; Pg 21 of 53]
Correction 50:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-per calcs the orifice is located at 4.25ft (El. 72.65).
[Plans Sht C4.07; Pg 21 of 53]
Correction 51:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-Is it necessary to have such a large control riser and inlet/outlet pipes at SDCB10?
[Plans Sht C4.07; Pg 21 of 53]
Correction 52:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Please callout 6in sediment storage as provided on previous submittal.
[Plans Sht C4.10; Pg 24 of 53]
Correction 53:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-2yr WSE is greater than the 10yr WSE?
[Plans Sht C4.10; Pg 24 of 53]
Correction 54:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-24" pipe per C4.04.
[Plans Sht C4.30; Pg 31 of 53]
Correction 55:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-per prior comment min. 10ft of straight pipe on inlet side of GI (ref. City Stds 402.3(8).
[Plans Sht C5.01; Pg 34 of 53]
Correction 56:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-pipe IE
[Plans Sht C5.01; Pg 34 of 53]
Correction 57:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-reference callout... (4/C5.08)?
[Plans Sht C5.01; Pg 34 of 53]
Correction 58:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-pipe slope.
[Plans Sht C5.01; Pg 34 of 53]
Correction 59:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-per GI comment.
[Plans Sht C5.01; Pg 34 of 53]
Correction 60:
See Document Markup
Comments:
ADD-SSMH 1 to table.
[Plans Sht C5.01; Pg 34 of 53]
Correction 61:
See Document Markup
Comments:
ADD-to structure table.
[Plans Sht C5.01; Pg 34 of 53]
Correction 62:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-reference callout... (4/C5.08)?
[Plans Sht C5.01; Pg 34 of 53]
Correction 63:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Please callout "inside drop manhole".
[Plans Sht C5.01; Pg 34 of 53]
Correction 64:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Pipe Run Info?
[Plans Sht C5.02; Pg 35 of 53]
Correction 65:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout?
[Plans Sht C5.02; Pg 35 of 53]
Correction 66:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify slope/invert.
[Plans Sht C5.02; Pg 35 of 53]
Correction 67:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Pipe Run Info?
[Plans Sht C5.02; Pg 35 of 53]
Correction 68:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Pipe Run Info?
[Plans Sht C5.04; Pg 37 of 53]
Correction 69:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-Ethafoam crossing per 3/C6.05.
[Plans Sht C5.05; Pg 38 of 53]
Correction 70:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-Ethafoam crossing per 3/C6.05.
[Plans Sht C5.06; Pg 39 of 53]
Correction 71:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Due to long term maintenance concerns associated with the stream corridor, the City desires the watermain to cross over the stream above the high water elevation. Restrained joints (field lok gaskets, megalug, tie rods, etc) and insulating wrap required. Provide elevation detail of the watermain crossing.
[Plans Sht C6.01; Pg 42 of 53]
Correction 72:
See Document Markup
Comments:
ADD-"to be recorded".
[Plans Sht C6.01; Pg 42 of 53]
Correction 73:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-Fire hydrant.
[Plans Sht C6.01; Pg 42 of 53]
Correction 74:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-1.5in RPBA for 1.5in meter.
[Plans Sht C6.01; Pg 42 of 53]
Correction 75:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-pipe run.
[Plans Sht C6.02; Pg 43 of 53]
Correction 76:
See Document Markup
Comments:
ADD-"to be recorded".
[Plans Sht C6.02; Pg 43 of 53]
Correction 77:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-pipe run.
[Plans Sht C6.02; Pg 43 of 53]
Correction 78:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Fitting callout.
[Plans Sht C6.02; Pg 43 of 53]
Correction 79:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show gate valve.
[Plans Sht C6.04; Pg 45 of 53]
Correction 80:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-bend info.
[Plans Sht C6.05; Pg 46 of 53]
Correction 81:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-tee to DDCVA?
[Plans Sht C6.05; Pg 46 of 53]
Correction 82:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-callout.
[Plans Sht C6.05; Pg 46 of 53]
Correction 83:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-callout.
[Plans Sht C6.05; Pg 46 of 53]
Correction 84:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Pipe run callout.
[Plans Sht C6.05; Pg 46 of 53]
Correction 85:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-pipe run with plan.
[Plans Sht C6.06; Pg 47 of 53]
Correction 86:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-Ethafoam crossing per 3/C6.05.
[Plans Sht C6.07; Pg 48 of 53]
Correction 87:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-pipe run with plan.
[Plans Sht C6.07; Pg 48 of 53]
Correction 88:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-Ethafoam crossing per 3/C6.05.
[Plans Sht C6.07; Pg 48 of 53]
Correction 89:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-Ethafoam crossing per 3/C6.05.
[Plans Sht C6.08; Pg 49 of 53]
Correction 90:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-Wet tap per Sht C6.01.
[Plans Sht C6.08; Pg 49 of 53]
Correction 91:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-Profile 1/Sta 14+06 is located at approx. Station 61+30 on this profile.
[Plans Sht C6.08; Pg 49 of 53]
Correction 92:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-Ethafoam crossing per 3/C6.05.
[Plans Sht C6.08; Pg 49 of 53]
Correction 93:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Readability.
[Plans Sht C6.08; Pg 49 of 53]
Correction 94:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Discuss Shaw Road frontage and Pioneer Way frontage flow control aspects.
[Storm Report; Pg 9 of 448]
Correction 95:
See Document Markup
Comments:
These conditions were for the design team's information on the previous review and do not have to be included on the civil plans. Up to the EoR discretion whether to remove or include on the planset.
[Plans Sht C0.0; Pg 1 of 63]
Correction 96:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-0420264021.
[Plans Sht C0.0; Pg 1 of 63]
Correction 97:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-0420264053.
[Plans Sht C0.0; Pg 1 of 63]
Correction 98:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-0420264054.
[Plans Sht C0.0; Pg 1 of 63]
Correction 99:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-Generator or Trash Enclosure?
[Plans Sht C0.0; Pg 1 of 63]
Correction 100:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CLARIFY-Trash Enclosure?
[Plans Sht C0.0; Pg 1 of 63]
Correction 101:
See Document Markup
Comments:
City Standards require a minimum 3ft of cover over CPEP pipe (ref. City Stds 204.4(3)). The City is willing to allow minimum cover of 30in, but staff cannot support a further reduction based on City regulations. If it is still desired to use CPEP with less than 30in of cover, a formal Alternative Methods Request (AMR) application must be submitted for review and formal decision by the City Engineer. Please be aware that cost savings cannot be a justification to deviate from City Standards.
[Plans Sht C0.0; Pg 1 of 63]
Correction 102:
See Document Markup
Comments:
ADD CFG application number-PRGR20230972.
[Plans Sht C1.0; Pg 2 of 63]
Correction 103:
See Document Markup
Comments:
ADD-CFG application number-PRGR20230972.
[Plans Sht C1.0; Pg 2 of 63]
Correction 104:
See Document Markup
Comments:
ADD Note-Portion of existing watermain to be rerouted.
[Plans Sht C1.0; Pg 2 of 63]
Correction 105:
See Document Markup
Comments:
OK to use detail...please remove title block info.
[Plans Sht C1.1; Pg 3 of 63]
Correction 106:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-drive aisle width with Fire Code Official.
[Plans Sht C2.1; Pg 4 of 63]
Correction 107:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-min. gate opening width serving trash and recycling is 25ft and min depth of enclosure is 12ft. See City Stds 208.1.
[Plans Sht C2.1; Pg 4 of 63]
Correction 108:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CLARIFY-generator area or trash enclosure? If trash enclosure, see City Stds 208.1 for enclosure req'ts.
[Plans Sht C2.1; Pg 4 of 63]
Correction 109:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout drive aisle width.
[Plans Sht C2.2; Pg 5 of 63]
Correction 110:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-min. gate opening width serving trash and recycling is 25ft. See City Stds 208.1(3).
[Plans Sht C2.2; Pg 5 of 63]
Correction 111:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-C2.1?
[Plans Sht C2.3; Pg 6 of 63]
Correction 112:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-C2.4?
[Plans Sht C2.3; Pg 6 of 63]
Correction 113:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout drive aisle width.
[Plans Sht C2.3; Pg 6 of 63]
Correction 114:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-drive aisle width with Fire Code Official.
[Plans Sht C2.3; Pg 6 of 63]
Correction 115:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-C2.2?
[Plans Sht C2.4; Pg 7 of 63]
Correction 116:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-C2.3?
[Plans Sht C2.4; Pg 7 of 63]
Correction 117:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add Note-"Walls over 4'-0" require separate building permit."
[Plans Sht C2.5; Pg 8 of 63]
Correction 118:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CLARIFY.
[Plans Sht C2.6; Pg 9 of 63]
Correction 119:
See Document Markup
Comments:
FYI-if this distance is less than 5ft (btwn landing and back of curb), then the DWS is req'd at the bottom of the ramp.
[Plans Sht C2.6; Pg 9 of 63]
Correction 120:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Delineate the regulated floodplain per the LOMR, Effective September 8, 2022.
[Plans Sht C3.1; Pg 10 of 63]
Correction 121:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT- Rim Elevation.
[Plans Sht C3.2; Pg 11 of 63]
Correction 122:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT- Rim Elevation.
[Plans Sht C3.2; Pg 11 of 63]
Correction 123:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Delineate the regulated floodplain per the LOMR, Effective September 8, 2022.
[Plans Sht C3.3; Pg 12 of 63]
Correction 124:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Delineate the regulated floodplain per the LOMR, Effective September 8, 2022.
[Plans Sht C3.4; Pg 13 of 63]
Correction 125:
See Document Markup
Comments:
RELOCATE-Phase line to top of pond.
[Plans Sht C3.4; Pg 13 of 63]
Correction 126:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-to protect existing storm drain serving properties to the south.
[Plans Sht C3.4; Pg 13 of 63]
Correction 127:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-Sheet callout (C4.07?).
[Plans Sht C4.01; Pg 14 of 63]
Correction 128:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Sht Ref C4.0X? (Typ).
Correction 129:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Delineate the regulated floodplain per the LOMR, Effective September 8, 2022.
[Plans Sht C4.01; Pg 14 of 63]
Correction 130:
See Document Markup
Comments:
ADD-WQ Rim and inlet elevation info.
[Plans Sht C4.01; Pg 14 of 63]
Correction 131:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-City Stds 204.3(4) requires min 12in dia pipe for mains. Revise accordingly.
[Plans Sht C4.01; Pg 14 of 63]
Correction 132:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-City Stds 204.3(4) requires min 12in dia pipe for mains. Revise accordingly.
[Plans Sht C4.01; Pg 14 of 63]
Correction 133:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-City Stds 204.3(4) requires min 12in dia pipe for mains. Revise accordingly.
[Plans Sht C4.01; Pg 14 of 63]
Correction 134:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-to 12" dia. per Stds 204.3(4) (south).
[Plans Sht C4.01; Pg 14 of 63]
Correction 135:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-to 12" dia. per Stds 204.3(4) (S & N).
[Plans Sht C4.01; Pg 14 of 63]
Correction 136:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-pipe info (size, mat'l, slope). Use ductile iron per City Stds 204.4.
[Plans Sht C4.01; Pg 14 of 63]
Correction 137:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-DI pipe due to shallow bury.
[Plans Sht C4.01; Pg 14 of 63]
Correction 138:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-to 12" dia. per Stds 204.3(4) (north).
[Plans Sht C4.01; Pg 14 of 63]
Correction 139:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-Profile 5/C4.06 (and 6/C4.06)?
[Plans Sht C4.01; Pg 14 of 63]
Correction 140:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-C4.07?
[Plans Sht C4.01; Pg 14 of 63]
Correction 141:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CLARIFY-generator area or trash enclosure? If trash enclosure, see City Stds 208.1 for enclosure req'ts.
[Plans Sht C2.1; Pg 4 of 63]
Correction 142:
See Document Markup
Comments:
City Standards require a minimum 3ft of cover over CPEP pipe (ref. City Stds 204.4(3)). The City is willing to allow minimum cover of 30in, but staff cannot support a further reduction based on City regulations. If it is still desired to use CPEP with less than 30in of cover, a formal Alternative Methods Request (AMR) application must be submitted for review and formal decision by the City Engineer. Please be aware that cost savings cannot be a justification to deviate from City Standards.
[Plans Sht C4.01; Pg 14 of 63]
Correction 143:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-Sheet callout (C4.07?).
[Plans Sht C4.02; Pg 15 of 63]
Correction 144:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide utility crossing information.
[Plans Sht C4.02; Pg 15 of 63]
Correction 145:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-C4.07?
[Plans Sht C4.02; Pg 15 of 63]
Correction 146:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-Solid locking lid for WQ purposes?
[Plans Sht C4.02; Pg 15 of 63]
Correction 147:
See Document Markup
Comments:
FYI-French Drain construction was removed from the CFG planset and pushed to the civil set.
[Plans Sht C4.02; Pg 15 of 63]
Correction 148:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-Rim and IE info.
[Plans Sht C4.02; Pg 15 of 63]
Correction 149:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-DI pipe due to shallow bury.
[Plans Sht C4.02; Pg 15 of 63]
Correction 150:
See Document Markup
Comments:
ADD-WQ5 Inlet info.
[Plans Sht C4.02; Pg 15 of 63]
Correction 151:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-pipe info (size, mat'l, slope).
[Plans Sht C4.02; Pg 15 of 63]
Correction 152:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-top elevations with Sht C4.21. (Also, see Control Riser comments, Sht C4.07).
[Plans Sht C4.02; Pg 15 of 63]
Correction 153:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-pipe slope w/ IEs.
[Plans Sht C4.02; Pg 15 of 63]
Correction 154:
See Document Markup
Comments:
ADD-WQ Rim and outlet elevation info.
[Plans Sht C4.02; Pg 15 of 63]
Correction 155:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-Profile 5/C4.06 (and 6/C4.06)?
[Plans Sht C4.02; Pg 15 of 63]
Correction 156:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-12" dia req'd.
[Plans Sht C4.02; Pg 15 of 63]
Correction 157:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Delineate the regulated floodplain per the LOMR, Effective September 8, 2022.
[Plans Sht C4.03; Pg 16 of 63]
Correction 158:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-Sheet callout (C4.07?).
[Plans Sht C4.03; Pg 16 of 63]
Correction 159:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-Pipe Info (Size, Mat'l, Slope).
[Plans Sht C4.03; Pg 16 of 63]
Correction 160:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-Pipe Info (Size, Mat'l, Slope).
[Plans Sht C4.03; Pg 16 of 63]
Correction 161:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CLARIFY-Phase 2 install?
[Plans Sht C4.03; Pg 16 of 63]
Correction 162:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CONFIRM-Material callout.
[Plans Sht C4.03; Pg 16 of 63]
Correction 163:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-to protect existing storm drain serving properties to the south.
[Plans Sht C4.03; Pg 16 of 63]
Correction 164:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide utility crossing information.
[Plans Sht C4.03; Pg 16 of 63]
Correction 165:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-Sheet callout (C4.07?).
[Plans Sht C4.04; Pg 17 of 63]
Correction 166:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-pipe size.
[Plans Sht C4.04; Pg 17 of 63]
Correction 167:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-pipe info (size and slope). Also, coordinate with Sht C4.31.
[Plans Sht C4.04; Pg 17 of 63]
Correction 168:
See Document Markup
Comments:
ADD-RTank 3 inlets #1, 3, and 4 with IEs.
[Plans Sht C4.04; Pg 17 of 63]
Correction 169:
See Document Markup
Comments:
ADD-SDCO#D1 structure details.
[Plans Sht C4.04; Pg 17 of 63]
Correction 170:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-DI pipe due to shallow bury.
[Plans Sht C4.04; Pg 17 of 63]
Correction 171:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-Existing storm pond serving properties to the south to be protected and remain in service until Phase 2.
[Plans Sht C4.04; Pg 17 of 63]
Correction 172:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-to protect existing storm drain serving properties to the south.
[Plans Sht C4.04; Pg 17 of 63]
Correction 173:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide utility crossing information.
[Plans Sht C4.04; Pg 17 of 63]
Correction 174:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Pipe to east?
[Plans Sht C4.05; Pg 18 of 63]
Correction 175:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CONFIRM-storm elev...if separation is less than 1ft (must be 6in min), then use ethafoam pad btwn the pipes.
[Plans Sht C4.05; Pg 18 of 63]
Correction 176:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-SDCB#40 info (type, rim and IE).
[Plans Sht C4.05; Pg 18 of 63]
Correction 177:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-DI pipe due to shallow bury.
[Plans Sht C4.05; Pg 18 of 63]
Correction 178:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-water crossing?
[Plans Sht C4.05; Pg 18 of 63]
Correction 179:
See Document Markup
Comments:
ADD-structure info.
[Plans Sht C4.05; Pg 18 of 63]
Correction 180:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Readability.
[Plans Sht C4.05; Pg 18 of 63]
Correction 181:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CONFIRM-storm elev.
[Plans Sht C4.05; Pg 18 of 63]
Correction 182:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show sewer and provide crossing info.
[Plans Sht C4.06; Pg 19 of 63]
Correction 183:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout IE (2 plcs).
[Plans Sht C4.06; Pg 19 of 63]
Correction 184:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Pipe to south?
[Plans Sht C4.06; Pg 19 of 63]
Correction 185:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Phase 2 Stub?
[Plans Sht C4.06; Pg 19 of 63]
Correction 186:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show existing storm main and provide crossing information.
[Plans Sht C4.06; Pg 19 of 63]
Correction 187:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per comments on C4.01, revise to 12" dia. per Stds 204.3(4) (north).
[Plans Sht C4.06; Pg 19 of 63]
Correction 188:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-fabric overlap reqts.
[Plans Sht C4.07; Pg 20 of 63]
Correction 189:
See Document Markup
Comments:
ADD-City Standard Details 02.01.05 // 02.01.09.
[Plans Sht C4.07; Pg 20 of 63]
Correction 190:
See Document Markup
Comments:
60in.
[Plans Sht C4.07; Pg 20 of 63]
Correction 191:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-1.5 per Storm Report, Pg 372 of 448.
[Plans Sht C4.07; Pg 20 of 63]
Correction 192:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-It appears to be El. 73.32 noted on Sht. C4.21 (5ft of live storage per calcs-which places riser top at El. 73.40). However, RTank 3 top of storage is El. 75.23. It appears that as RTank 3 fills, RTank 2 will go into overflow before RTank 3 storage is fully utilized. If riser top is intended to be El. 75.25, then RTank 2 appears to be in a surcharged condition.
[Plans Sht C4.07; Pg 20 of 63]
Correction 193:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-24in used in calcs per Storm Report, Pg 372 of 448.
[Plans Sht C4.07; Pg 20 of 63]
Correction 194:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-1.25 per Storm Report, Pg 372 of 448.
[Plans Sht C4.07; Pg 20 of 63]
Correction 195:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-18in used in calcs per Storm Report, Pg 373 of 448.
[Plans Sht C4.07; Pg 20 of 63]
Correction 196:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-It appears to be El. 70.88 noted on Sht. C4.11 (2ft of live storage per calcs-which places riser top at El 69.40). Also, there are a number of CB rims below this elevation.
[Plans Sht C4.07; Pg 20 of 63]
Correction 197:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-2.25 per Storm Report, Pg 373 of 448.
[Plans Sht C4.07; Pg 20 of 63]
Correction 198:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-1.25ft above IE per calcs in Storm Report, Pg 373 of 448.
[Plans Sht C4.07; Pg 20 of 63]
Correction 199:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY- calcs callout a 3rd orifice on the control riser per Storm Report, Pg 373 of 448.
[Plans Sht C4.07; Pg 20 of 63]
Correction 200:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CLARIFY-whether the optional drain down device will be implemented. (See GULD Para 3)
[Plans Sht C4.08; Pg 21 of 63]
Correction 201:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CONFIRM-IE w Sht C4.02.
[Plans Sht C4.08; Pg 21 of 63]
Correction 202:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CONFIRM-12in per Sht C4.02.
[Plans Sht C4.08; Pg 21 of 63]
Correction 203:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CONFIRM-12in per Sht C4.02.
[Plans Sht C4.08; Pg 21 of 63]
Correction 204:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Legibility.
[Plans Sht C4.08; Pg 21 of 63]
Correction 205:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CLARIFY-whether the optional drain down device will be implemented. (See GULD Para 3)
[Plans Sht C4.09; Pg 22 of 63]
Correction 206:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Legibility.
[Plans Sht C4.09; Pg 22 of 63]
Correction 207:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Legibility.
[Plans Sht C4.10; Pg 23 of 63]
Correction 208:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Legibility.
[Plans Sht C4.12; Pg 25 of 63]
Correction 209:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Legibility.
[Plans Sht C4.13; Pg 26 of 63]
Correction 210:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Legibility.
[Plans Sht C4.14; Pg 27 of 63]
Correction 211:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Legibility.
[Plans Sht C4.15; Pg 28 of 63]
Correction 212:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Legibility.
[Plans Sht C4.16; Pg 29 of 63]
Correction 213:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-manufactured 30mil (min) impermeable liner to prevent groundwater intrusion.
[Plans Sht C4.17; Pg 30 of 63]
Correction 214:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Legibility.
[Plans Sht C4.17; Pg 30 of 63]
Correction 215:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Legibility.
[Plans Sht C4.20; Pg 31 of 63]
Correction 216:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CLARIFY- See Control Structure comments on Sht C4.07, and riser comments in Storm Report, Pg 372 of 448.
[Plans Sht C4.21; Pg 32 of 63]
Correction 217:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CLARIFY- See storage volume required comments in Storm Report, Pg 372 of 448.
[Plans Sht C4.21; Pg 32 of 63]
Correction 218:
See Document Markup
Comments:
PROVIDE-2yr and 10yr water surface elevations on the cross section.
[Plans Sht C4.21; Pg 32 of 63]
Correction 219:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Legibility.
[Plans Sht C4.21; Pg 32 of 63]
Correction 220:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Legibility.
[Plans Sht C4.22; Pg 33 of 63]
Correction 221:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Legibility.
[Plans Sht C4.23; Pg 34 of 63]
Correction 222:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Legibility.
[Plans Sht C4.24; Pg 35 of 63]
Correction 223:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Legibility.
[Plans Sht C4.25; Pg 36 of 63]
Correction 224:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Legibility.
[Plans Sht C4.26; Pg 37 of 63]
Correction 225:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-manufactured 30mil (min) impermeable liner to prevent groundwater intrusion.
[Plans Sht C4.27; Pg 38 of 63]
Correction 226:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Legibility.
[Plans Sht C4.27; Pg 38 of 63]
Correction 227:
See Document Markup
Comments:
COORDINATE with Sht C4.03.
[Plans Sht C4.30; Pg 39 of 63]
Correction 228:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Legibility.
[Plans Sht C4.30; Pg 39 of 63]
Correction 229:
See Document Markup
Comments:
COORDINATE with Sht C4.04.
[Plans Sht C4.31; Pg 40 of 63]
Correction 230:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CLARIFY- See Control Structure comments on Sht C4.07, and riser comments in Storm Report, Pg 372 of 448.
[Plans Sht C4.31; Pg 40 of 63]
Correction 231:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CLARIFY- See storage volume required comments in Storm Report, Pg 372 of 448.
[Plans Sht C4.31; Pg 40 of 63]
Correction 232:
See Document Markup
Comments:
PROVIDE-2yr and 10yr water surface elevations on the cross section.
[Plans Sht C4.31; Pg 40 of 63]
Correction 233:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Legibility.
[Plans Sht C4.31; Pg 40 of 63]
Correction 234:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Legibility.
[Plans Sht C4.32; Pg 41 of 63]
Correction 235:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Legibility.
[Plans Sht C4.33; Pg 42 of 63]
Correction 236:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Legibility.
[Plans Sht C4.34; Pg 43 of 63]
Correction 237:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-manufactured 30mil (min) impermeable liner to prevent groundwater intrusion.
[Plans Sht C4.35; Pg 44 of 63]
Correction 238:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Legibility.
[Plans Sht C4.35; Pg 44 of 63]
Correction 239:
See Document Markup
Comments:
PROVIDE-grease interceptor sizing calculations (750 gal min) for both GIs.
[Plans Sht C5.01; Pg 45 of 63]
Correction 240:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Service lateral exceeds max. grade (8% max). Revise accordingly.
[Plans Sht C5.01; Pg 45 of 63]
Correction 241:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-exceeds max allowable slope (8%).
[Plans Sht C5.01; Pg 45 of 63]
Correction 242:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-drop manhole.
[Plans Sht C5.01; Pg 45 of 63]
Correction 243:
See Document Markup
Comments:
See comment on plan.
[Plans Sht C5.01; Pg 45 of 63]
Correction 244:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-min. 10ft of straight pipe on inlet side of GI (ref. City Stds 402.3(8).
[Plans Sht C5.01; Pg 45 of 63]
Correction 245:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-show tee on downstream side of GI (ref. City Stds 402.3(9).
[Plans Sht C5.01; Pg 45 of 63]
Correction 246:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-sampling connection per City Std Detail 04.03.04.
[Plans Sht C5.01; Pg 45 of 63]
Correction 247:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-sheet reference (C5.5?).
[Plans Sht C5.01; Pg 45 of 63]
Correction 248:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout?
[Plans Sht C5.01; Pg 45 of 63]
Correction 249:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-cleanout and IE.
[Plans Sht C5.01; Pg 45 of 63]
Correction 250:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-min. 10ft separation btwn sewer and foundation(s).
[Plans Sht C5.01; Pg 45 of 63]
Correction 251:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-sampling connection per City Std Detail 04.03.04.
[Plans Sht C5.01; Pg 45 of 63]
Correction 252:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-sheet reference (C5.5?).
[Plans Sht C5.01; Pg 45 of 63]
Correction 253:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-PVC per record drawings. (Permit E21-0426).
[Plans Sht C5.01; Pg 45 of 63]
Correction 254:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-DI per record drawings. (Permit E21-0426).
[Plans Sht C5.01; Pg 45 of 63]
Correction 255:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-cleanout and IE.
[Plans Sht C5.01; Pg 45 of 63]
Correction 256:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-show tee on downstream side of GI (ref. City Stds 402.3(9).
[Plans Sht C5.01; Pg 45 of 63]
Correction 257:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-min. 10ft separation btwn sewer and foundation(s).
[Plans Sht C5.01; Pg 45 of 63]
Correction 258:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-DI pipe due to shallow bury.
[Plans Sht C5.01; Pg 45 of 63]
Correction 259:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-DI pipe due to shallow bury.
[Plans Sht C5.01; Pg 45 of 63]
Correction 260:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-Record Dwgs indicate this connection as a simple tie-in to an existing stub...no structure.
[Plans Sht C5.01; Pg 45 of 63]
Correction 261:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide utility crossing information.
[Plans Sht C5.02; Pg 46 of 63]
Correction 262:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Service lateral exceeds max. grade (8% max). Revise accordingly.
[Plans Sht C5.02; Pg 46 of 63]
Correction 263:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-structure type and grate.
[Plans Sht C5.02; Pg 46 of 63]
Correction 264:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-side sewer IE.
[Plans Sht C5.02; Pg 46 of 63]
Correction 265:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-pipe info (size, mat'l, slope).
[Plans Sht C5.02; Pg 46 of 63]
Correction 266:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout?
[Plans Sht C5.02; Pg 46 of 63]
Correction 267:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Readability.
[Plans Sht C5.02; Pg 46 of 63]
Correction 268:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-PVC per record drawings. (Permit E21-0426).
[Plans Sht C5.02; Pg 46 of 63]
Correction 269:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-sampling connection per City Std Detail 04.03.04.
[Plans Sht C5.02; Pg 46 of 63]
Correction 270:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-sampling connection per City Std Detail 04.03.04.
[Plans Sht C5.02; Pg 46 of 63]
Correction 271:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide utility crossing information.
[Plans Sht C5.03; Pg 47 of 63]
Correction 272:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Service lateral exceeds max. grade (8% max). Revise accordingly.
[Plans Sht C5.03; Pg 47 of 63]
Correction 273:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-sampling connection per City Std Detail 04.03.04.
[Plans Sht C5.03; Pg 47 of 63]
Correction 274:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-sampling connection per City Std Detail 04.03.04.
[Plans Sht C5.03; Pg 47 of 63]
Correction 275:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-sampling connection per City Std Detail 04.03.04.
[Plans Sht C5.03; Pg 47 of 63]
Correction 276:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide utility crossing information.
[Plans Sht C5.04; Pg 48 of 63]
Correction 277:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Service lateral exceeds max. grade (8% max). Revise accordingly.
[Plans Sht C5.04; Pg 48 of 63]
Correction 278:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-sampling connection per City Std Detail 04.03.04.
[Plans Sht C5.04; Pg 48 of 63]
Correction 279:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-sampling connection per City Std Detail 04.03.04.
[Plans Sht C5.04; Pg 48 of 63]
Correction 280:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout?
[Plans Sht C5.04; Pg 48 of 63]
Correction 281:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout?
[Plans Sht C5.04; Pg 48 of 63]
Correction 282:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-sampling connection per City Std Detail 04.03.04.
[Plans Sht C5.04; Pg 48 of 63]
Correction 283:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-sampling connection per City Std Detail 04.03.04.
[Plans Sht C5.04; Pg 48 of 63]
Correction 284:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-sampling connection per City Std Detail 04.03.04.
[Plans Sht C5.04; Pg 48 of 63]
Correction 285:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-sampling connection per City Std Detail 04.03.04.
[Plans Sht C5.04; Pg 48 of 63]
Correction 286:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-per comment Sht C5.02.
[Plans Sht C5.05; Pg 49 of 63]
Correction 287:
See Document Markup
Comments:
PROVIDE-utility crossing info.
[Plans Sht C5.05; Pg 49 of 63]
Correction 288:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-drop manhole per City Std Detail 04.01.02.
[Plans Sht C5.05; Pg 49 of 63]
Correction 289:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-per comment Sht C5.01.
[Plans Sht C5.05; Pg 49 of 63]
Correction 290:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-pipe run with Sht C5.03.
[Plans Sht C5.06; Pg 50 of 63]
Correction 291:
See Document Markup
Comments:
PROVIDE-utility crossing info (exist'g SD and new sewer).
[Plans Sht C5.06; Pg 50 of 63]
Correction 292:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-per comment Sht C5.02.
[Plans Sht C5.06; Pg 50 of 63]
Correction 293:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-pipe length with Sht C5.04.
[Plans Sht C5.06; Pg 50 of 63]
Correction 294:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-per comment Sht C5.02.
[Plans Sht C5.06; Pg 50 of 63]
Correction 295:
See Document Markup
Comments:
PROVIDE-utility crossing info.
[Plans Sht C5.07; Pg 51 of 63]
Correction 296:
See Document Markup
Comments:
ADD-City Std Detail 04.03.04 // 04.06.02
[Plans Sht C5.5; Pg 52 of 63]
Correction 297:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-sheet callout (C5.08?).
[Plans Sht C5.5; Pg 52 of 63]
Correction 298:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-sheet callout (C6.08?). (4 plcs)
[Plans Sht C6.01; Pg 53 of 63]
Correction 299:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-sheet callout (C6.09?). (5 plcs)
[Plans Sht C6.01; Pg 53 of 63]
Correction 300:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-sheet callout (C6.10?). (3 plcs)
[Plans Sht C6.01; Pg 53 of 63]
Correction 301:
See Document Markup
Comments:
ADD NOTE: Wet taps to existing water mains shall be accomplished through a tapping tee and tapping valve and shall be made by a city approved contractor. The tapping sleeve shall be Romac SST all stainless steel tapping sleeve or approved equal. A two-piece epoxy coated or ductile iron tapping sleeve may be used on ductile iron pipe, when the tap is smaller than the water main size i.e. 6-inch tap on 8-inch pipe. The City shall approve the time and location for these connections.
[Plans Sht C6.01; Pg 53 of 63]
Correction 302:
See Document Markup
Comments:
ADD NOTE: If the project is utilizing a fire booster pump, the FDC must connect to the sprinkler system on the discharge side of the pump in accordance with NFPA regulations.).
[Plans Sht C6.01; Pg 53 of 63]
Correction 303:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-and show thrust block.
[Plans Sht C6.01; Pg 53 of 63]
Correction 304:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-Sheet Ref (C6.03).
[Plans Sht C6.01; Pg 53 of 63]
Correction 305:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-and show thrust block.
[Plans Sht C6.01; Pg 53 of 63]
Correction 306:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-8x8 wet tap.
[Plans Sht C6.01; Pg 53 of 63]
Correction 307:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-8in GV.
[Plans Sht C6.01; Pg 53 of 63]
Correction 308:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-Sheet Ref (C6.02).
[Plans Sht C6.01; Pg 53 of 63]
Correction 309:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-PIV and DDCVA.
[Plans Sht C6.01; Pg 53 of 63]
Correction 310:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-sheet reference (C6.10?).
[Plans Sht C6.01; Pg 53 of 63]
Correction 311:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-and show 2in GV.
[Plans Sht C6.01; Pg 53 of 63]
Correction 312:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-callout 2" per City Std Detail 03.03.02.
[Plans Sht C6.01; Pg 53 of 63]
Correction 313:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-sheet reference (C6.10?).
[Plans Sht C6.01; Pg 53 of 63]
Correction 314:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-callout 1" per City Std Detail 03.03.01.
[Plans Sht C6.01; Pg 53 of 63]
Correction 315:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-PIV and DDCVA.
[Plans Sht C6.01; Pg 53 of 63]
Public Works Water Review
Failed
05/13/2024
05/02/2024
Reviewer:
Corrections:
Correction 1:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Landscape L1.0: No tree within 10-feet of water mains, hydrants, FDC's, PIV's, meters, and back flow protection. Provide 3-foot planting clear zone around hydrants, FDC's, PIV's, meters, and back flow protection.
Correction 2:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Landscape L1.0: No irrigation plan is shown. Show irrigation service, size of meter, protected by same size DCVA on Landscape and Civil plans.
Correction 3:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.02: The existing 8-inch water main through this project will be public and all other water lines will be private. Show and call out the public water easement for this plan set.
Correction 4:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.02: No line valves are called out on the public water main through this project. If any work needs to be done on this public main, all water to this complex will be off until work is completed. At a minimum, consider installing three 8-inch gate valves at this tee for better control. One 8-inch gate valve is required on the east side of this tee.
Correction 5:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.02: Call out and show a 6-inch gate valve at this tee.
Correction 6:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.02: Call out PIV.
Correction 7:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.02: Install an 8-inch by 6-inch reducer on south side of tee, with a 6-inch gate valve.
Correction 8:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.02: Call out and show an 8-inch gate valve at south side of tee.
Correction 9:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.02: Call out PIV.
Correction 10:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.02: Call out and show 2-inch gate valve at water main tap.
Correction 11:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.02: No backflow protection is shown for this water service.
Correction 12:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.02: Call out 2-inch PE, not 3-inch PE.
Correction 13:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.02: Call out 8-inch stainless steel tapping sleeve with gate valve. Show valve.
Correction 14:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.02: Call out and show 2-inch gate valve at water main tap. Call out 2-inch PE not 3-inch PE. No backflow protection is shown for this water service.
Correction 15:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.02: Call out PIV.
Correction 16:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.02: Call out and show 6-inch gate valve at tee.
Correction 17:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.02: Call out and show 6-inch gate valve at tee.
Correction 18:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.02: Call out PIV.
Correction 19:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.02: Call out and show 2-inch gate valve at water main tap. Call out 2-inch PE not 3-inch PE. No backflow protection is shown for this water service.
Correction 20:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.02: Fire flow will be reduced by not looping in the dead-end 8-inch water main run. If the water main is not looped, install an 8-inch MJ plug on the west side of the hydrant tee with a thrust block. No 8-inch gate valve needed.
Correction 21:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.02: Fire flow will be reduced by not looping in the dead-end 8-inch water main run. If the water main is not looped, install an 8-inch MJ plug on the west side of the hydrant tee with a thrust block. No 8-inch gate valve needed. Show the 6-inch gate valve for the hydrant. A fire hydrant run should be 20-feet or less in length. Move hydrant back in parking bump-out.
Correction 22:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.02: Show 8-inch gate valve at tee.
Correction 23:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.03: Call out and show 2-inch gate valve at water main tap. Call out 2-inch PE not 3-inch PE. No backflow protection is shown for this water service.
Correction 24:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.03: Call out and show 2-inch gate valve at water main tap. Call out 2-inch PE not 3-inch PE. No backflow protection is shown for this water service.
Correction 25:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.03: Do not install 8-inch gate valve until the phase 2 tie-in. Install a 2-inch blow-off assembly per City Standard detail 03.06.01.
Correction 26:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.04: Call out and show 2-inch gate valves at water main taps. Call out 2-inch PE not 3-inch PE. No backflow protection is shown for these water services.
Correction 27:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.04: When phase 2 is installed the 8-inch water main will be looped for better fire flow. Install an 8-inch by 6-inch fire hydrant tee west of the fire line tee to provide better future fire flow for the hydrant. The fire line tee can now be 8-inch by 6-inch with a 6-inch gate valve. The 8-inch gate valve to the east will be installed at the phase 2 tie-in. For now install an 8-inch MJ plug in the east end of the fire line tee with thrust blocking.
Correction 28:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.04: Call out PIV.
Correction 29:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.07: In a perfect world it would be great to keep our water main at 36-inches of cover. To eliminate trapped air high points, it would be best to run the relocated 8-inch water main under the 12-inch storm line at STA 51+00. Run the 8-inch relatively flat and transition with 45-degree bends to the low tie-in.
Correction 30:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.09: Move the standard detail to Sheet C6.08.
Correction 31:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.09: Remove this Standard detail and replace with 03.06.01 2-inch blow-off assembly.
Correction 32:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.10: Remove this unneeded Standard detail.
Correction 33:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.01: A water main running under a stream is problematic. The water main might have to be reconfigured to travel over the stream. This will require engineering to support, insulate, and restrain the pipe in this area.
Correction 34:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.01: Stainless steel tapping sleeves are only required on full size on size wet taps. Remove the stainless steel requirement on 6-inch wet taps.
Correction 35:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.01: Show the private water service lines into each building. If this is a 1.5-inch meter, a 1.5-inch RPBA would be the correct size.
Correction 36:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.02: There are two old water services on Shaw Road that need to be removed as part of this project. A water main shutdown will need to be scheduled with the Water Division, and the corporation stops will need to be removed off the water main and replaced with brass plugs.
Correction 37:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.02: Remove the 6 LF of 8-inch DIP and install 8-inch MJ plug in west side of hydrant tee.
Correction 38:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.02: Remove the 5 LF of 8-inch DIP and install 8-inch MJ plug in west side of hydrant tee.
Correction 39:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.04: Recommend that the fire hydrant run is off a separate tee just west of the fire line tee. Install a gate valve on the north side of the tee for the solo fire line run. Remove the 8-inch gate valve east of the fire line tee, until the phase 2 tie-in. If you keep the present configuration, install an 8-inch by 8-inch tee with gate valve to north, 8-inch DIP to hydrant tee, then reducer to 6-inch fire line run.
Correction 40:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil C-14: For pages C-14, C-15, C-16, C-17: Make corrections to all Development Engineering comments on these pages.
Correction 41:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil C-14: For pages C-14, C-15, C-16, C-17: Many of the proposed fire hydrant runs are located off dead-end 8-inch water mains, which reduces the available fire flow. Pay to have a hydraulic model of the proposed water layout, to see if the available fire flow will meet the building requirements.
Correction 42:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil C-14: For pages C-14, C-15: The existing 8-inch water main that runs through this project also supplies water to the property to the south, which requires the water main to be public. Since this existing water main will be running through proposed parking areas, the City will allow a one-time exception from our 40-foot utility easement requirement, and allow the water main to be placed in the middle of a 20-foot easement.
Correction 43:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil C-14: For pages C-14, C-15, C-16, C-17: All water infrastructure for this project outside the proposed public utility easement shall be private, and the property owners responsibility to repair and maintain. This includes all parts of each water service (i.e. connection taps, service line, meter setters, meter boxes, etc.), the only exception would be the water meters and radio transmission equipment (MXU) which would be owned by the City, but paid for and installed by the contractor.
Correction 44:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil C-14: For pages C-14, C-15, C-16, C-17: If the buildings are housing just apartments, a DCVA will be sufficient back flow protection. If the buildings contain both commercial space and apartments, upgrade the protection to an above ground RPBA.
Correction 45:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub 4-15-2024 Sheet C6.01: The latest hydraulic model on 4-16-2024 shows that a fire hydrant and a fire sprinkler system on a dead-end 8-inch water main cannot provide the 1,500 GPM fire flow required to support this building structure.
Correction 46:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub 4-15-2024 Sheet C6.02: The latest hydraulic model on 4-16-2024 shows that fire hydrants and fire sprinkler systems on a dead-end 8-inch water main cannot provide the 1,500 GPM fire flow required to support these building structures.
Correction 47:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub 4-15-2024 Sheet C6.01: Remove the words 'stainless steel' from this call out.
Correction 48:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.01: The existing 8-inch water main through this project will be public and all other water lines will be private. Show and call out the public water easement on this plan set.
Correction 49:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.01: This tee will be an 8-inch by 8-inch wet tap with a stainless steel tapping sleeve and an 8-inch gate valve. Not 8-inch by 6-inch as called out.
Correction 50:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.01: Call out PIV.
Correction 51:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.01: Follow City standards. Call out 2-inch PE with 2-inch gate valves shown on plan set.
Correction 52:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.01: 1.5-inch meter requires 1.5-inch RPBA not 1-inch.
Correction 53:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.01: 1-inch PE for 1-inch water service.
Correction 54:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.01: The hydrant tee should be called out as 8-inch by 8-inch by 6-inch Fl tee. An 8-inch Fl by MJ adapter to the east. An 8-inch by 6-inch Fl reducer to the west. A 6-inch gate valve Fl by MJ west of reducer. Call out PIV by fire vault.
Correction 55:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.01: Fire flow will be reduced by not looping in the dead-end 8-inch water main runs.
Planning Review
Failed
05/13/2024
04/30/2024
Reviewer:
Corrections:
Correction 1:
Miscellaneous Planning Correction
Comments:
CRITICAL AREAS: Is the November 30, 2022 stream corridor revegetation plan (drawn by 'Nature by Design', KOwens) the current plan set for the mitigation plan? Please include those plan sheets with the landscape sheets. Will the mitigation plan be updated as a result of the USACE review and approval process?
UPDATED 03/04/24: No response to this comment located. No stream re-veg plan in landscape resubmittal located. Outstanding comment.
Correction 2:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
SEPA CONDITIONS: SEPA mitigation measures require implementation of a requirement for off-site safe routes to schools improvements. See P-21-0034 SEPA (June 27, 2023). Please provide those plans for further review and agency consultation.
UPDATED 03/04/24: No response to this comment located. Assumed this will be a separate off-site civil permit submittal.
UPDATED 04/30/24: No response to this comment located. Assumed this will be a separate off-site civil permit submittal. Please respond.
Correction 3:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
LANDSCAPE 03/04/24: Daffodils are required throughout site design frontages, consistent with VMS section 7.3. All perimeter landscape yard areas required by PMC 20.58 shall include Narcissus trumpet 'King Alfred' or ‘Dutch Master’ in the first 3’ of landscape areas behind the property line, planted at 6” on-center. Not located on the landscape plan sheets.
LANDSCAPE 03/04/24: Provide bench seating and other pedestrian features on the landscape plan sheets in the street corner plaza. This is required by PMC 20.30.037, and was previously noted. Providing bench seating and ped scale lighting will meet the min. requirements.
LANDSCAPE 04/30/24: Items from March 04 review still outstanding, not located on plan sheets or in comment response.
Engineering Civil Review
Failed
03/22/2024
03/27/2024
Reviewer:
Corrections:
Correction 1:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide auto-turn analysis for the largest anticipated vehicle that would access the site to ensure adequate radii an dimensioning. Coordinate with Shaw Road frontage plans.
[Plans C-3; Pg 3 of 45]
Correction 2:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add Fire Code Official approval block to the Water plan sheets. (Ref. City Stds Section 1.4.
[Plans C-14; Pg 14 of 45]
Correction 3:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Rotate hydrant to face drive aisle.
[Plans C-15; Pg 15 of 45]
Correction 4:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Due to high groundwater, use impermeable synthetic liner.
[Plans C-37; Pg 36 of 45]
Correction 5:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coordinate CSWPPP with the review comments associated with the CFG application PRGR20230972.
[CSWPPP; Pg 1 of 14]
Correction 6:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Prior to Occupancy, submit a DRAFT version of the City's Stormwater Management Facilities Agreement with an O&M manual using the maintenance activities described in the City's Stormwater Site Management Plan. The agreement shall be recorded with the Pierce County Auditors Office.
[O&M Manual; Pg 1 of 25]
Correction 7:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide R-Tank O&M information.
[O&M Manual; Pg 1 of 25]
Correction 8:
See Document Markup
Comments:
See comments on the 'Existing Conditions Map'.
[Storm Report; Pg 5 of 448]
Correction 9:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Actually very little runoff generated onsite discharges to the eastern stream channel.
[Storm Report; Pg 5 of 448]
Correction 10:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Actually the existing storm facility releases through a control structure which is conveyed to the Pioneer Way ditch located at the north property line via a 15in storm pipe...revise accordingly.
[Storm Report; Pg 6 of 448]
Correction 11:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Please be aware that the existing storm facility's berm has been breached by the stream on the east side of the site due to lack of maintenance of the pond. The stream is currently being conveyed through the facility and outlet structure, then northward to Pioneer Way ditch via the 15in storm main.
[Storm Report; Pg 6 of 448]
Correction 12:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Very little surface runoff generated on the site is released to the east channel. With the exception of the existing storm pond serving the properties to the south, most of the onsite surface water either collects in the NW corner of the site or enters the Pioneer Way ditch...revise accordingly.
[Storm Report; Pg 6 of 448]
Correction 13:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-"east"?
[Storm Report; Pg 6 of 448]
Correction 14:
See Document Markup
Comments:
FYI-It is more than a mile to the Puyallup River along the project's release route which includes the Pioneer Way north ditch and main stem of Deer Creek.
[Storm Report; Pg 6 of 448]
Correction 15:
See Document Markup
Comments:
The WQ biopod is located upstream of the RTanks.
[Storm Report; Pg 6 of 448]
Correction 16:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-12in pipe called out on civils.
[Storm Report; Pg 6 of 448]
Correction 17:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CLARIFY-Biopod?
[Storm Report; Pg 6 of 448]
Correction 18:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CLARIFY-Biopod?
[Storm Report; Pg 6 of 448]
Correction 19:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Prior to PH2 approval, provide a backwater analysis of the Pioneer Avenue conveyance system as outlined in City Standards Section 204.3 considering the tailwater elevation (OHWM) of the Pioneer Avenue north ditch, west of Shaw Road. The analysis shall include runoff from onsite (developed conditions) and offsite (existing conditions) basins tributary to the discharge location.
[Storm Report; Pg 6 of 448]
Correction 20:
See Document Markup
Comments:
See comment in Section 2.2.
[Storm Report; Pg 7 of 448]
Correction 21:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY- Exhibit D2 seems more applicable for WQ.
[Storm Report; Pg 7 of 448]
Correction 22:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CLARIFY-three tanks are indicated in Phase 1 (#1, #2, and #3).
[Storm Report; Pg 8 of 448]
Correction 23:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CLARIFY-please add commentary that the pumping is only during the construction phase and the permanent condition will be gravity release.
[Storm Report; Pg 8 of 448]
Correction 24:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show Bypass basins on an exhibit.
[Storm Report; Pg 8 of 448]
Correction 25:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CLARIFY-Biopod?
[Storm Report; Pg 8 of 448]
Correction 26:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Discuss Shaw Road frontage, Pioneer Way frontage, and future Phase 2 WQ aspects.
[Storm Report; Pg 8 of 448]
Correction 27:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Phase 1 only?
[Storm Report; Pg 8 of 448]
Correction 28:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Future RTank is not shown on the plans.
[Storm Report; Pg 9 of 448]
Correction 29:
See Document Markup
Comments:
FYI ONLY-the City's expectation is that the future replacement storm facility match flow control and water quality constraints of the original pond design (CES, Inc. design; single-event methodology). However, it is acceptable to redesign the facility using current storm regulations (continuous simulation modeling) although it seems counterintuitive due to the increase in facility size necessary to meet the continuous simulation methodology. Similarly, routing the upstream offsite existing flows through the proposed East Town flow control facilities also seems counterintuitive due to the impact to those facilities...particularly since there is an existing pipe outfall at Pioneer Way which serves the existing storm pond. Either way, most important will be to show that the release rates from the future facility, either stand-alone or combined with East Town's facilities, are equal or less than the release rates (2yr/10yr/100yr) of the original facility.
[Storm Report; Pg 9 of 448]
Correction 30:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add commentary that the RTanks can support the EV outrigger loads and include the manufacturer's confirmation letter.
[Storm Report; Pg 9 of 448]
Correction 31:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Ref Ecology Section III-2.4 too.
Correction 32:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Discuss Shaw Road frontage and Pioneer Way frontage flow control aspects.
[Storm Report; Pg 9 of 448]
Correction 33:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-no additional studies associated with the PH2 stream relocation?
[Storm Report; Pg 10 of 448]
Correction 34:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add: "A Stormwater Maintenance Agreement will be recorded at the time of Occupancy in accordance with City Standards."
[Storm Report; Pg 10 of 448]
Correction 35:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add: "Not a Part".
[Storm Report; Pg 13 of 448]
Correction 36:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add: "Not a Part".
[Storm Report; Pg 13 of 448]
Correction 37:
See Document Markup
Comments:
FYI...Section 1.2.1 states that Abbey Road Group was the surveyor.
[Storm Report; Pg 13 of 448]
Correction 38:
See Document Markup
Comments:
FYI...Section 1.2.1 states that Abbey Road Group was the surveyor.
[Storm Report; Pg 13 of 448]
Correction 39:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Identify/Delineate subasins (Upper, Lower, Bypass) used in the modeling.
[Storm Report; Pg 14 of 448]
Correction 40:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Identify "Future" detention facility location serving existing properties to the south.
[Storm Report; Pg 14 of 448]
Correction 41:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Please provide a surface area breakdown by phase and basin name. For example, PH1 MF Roof area = ______sf (ac); PH2 MF Roof area = ______sf (ac); etc. Provide a total for each basin breakdown. Also, include the frontage bypass basins.
[Storm Report; Pg 14 of 448]
Correction 42:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Prior to Occupancy, submit a DRAFT version of the City's Stormwater Management Facilities Agreement with an O&M manual using the maintenance activities described in the City's Stormwater Site Management Plan. The agreement shall be recorded with the Pierce County Auditors Office.
[Storm Report; Pg 195 of 448]
Correction 43:
See Document Markup
Comments:
At the time of submitting the Stormwater Management Facilities Agreement include the R-Tank and BioPod O&M information.
[Storm Report; Pg 195 of 448]
Correction 44:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Okay to leave this Appendix C empty at this time, since a formal O&M manual will be required at Closeout.
[Storm Report; Pg 195 of 448]
Correction 45:
See Document Markup
Comments:
PROVIDE-buoyancy calculations or buoyancy certification letter for the RTank system considering groundwater monitoring results conducted by Abbey Road Group.
[Storm Report; Pg 208 of 448]
Correction 46:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CLARIFY-shouldn't these PH2 areas be included in WQ Basin 4 since the future developed areas are discharging to Profile 4/C4.06 and ultimately the WQ4 Biopod?
[Storm Report; Pg 359 of 448]
Correction 47:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Please clarify that WQ for this area will be addressed in PH2.
[Storm Report; Pg 359 of 448]
Correction 48:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-1.37 per Plans, Sht C4.07.
[Storm Report; Pg 372 of 448]
Correction 49:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-18in called out on Sht C4.07.
[Storm Report; Pg 372 of 448]
Correction 50:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CLARIFY-the combined total storage for RTank2 and RTank3 is 141,452cf (78,829 + 62,623) per civil plans, Sht C4.21 and C4.31.
[Storm Report; Pg 372 of 448]
Correction 51:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coordinate calculations to reflect the actual control risers being used with the individual RTank system for each subasin.
[Storm Report; Pg 372 of 448]
Correction 52:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-5ft of live storage places riser top at El. 73.40. RTank 3 top of storage is El. 75.23. It appears that as RTank 3 fills, RTank 2 will go into overflow before RTank 3 storage is fully utilized (See comments Sht C4.07 too).
[Storm Report; Pg 372 of 448]
Correction 53:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-El. 74.21 (5.81ft) called out on Sht C4.07.
[Storm Report; Pg 373 of 448]
Correction 54:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-2.25in called out on Sht C4.07.
[Storm Report; Pg 373 of 448]
Correction 55:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-12in called out on Sht C4.07.
[Storm Report; Pg 373 of 448]
Correction 56:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coordinate calculations to reflect the actual control risers being used with the individual RTank system for each subasin.
[Storm Report; Pg 373 of 448]
Correction 57:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-El. 100.00?
[Storm Report; Pg 373 of 448]
Correction 58:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-2.06 per Plans, Sht C4.07.
[Storm Report; Pg 373 of 448]
Correction 59:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-El. 68.30 (0.9ft) called out on Sht C4.07.
[Storm Report; Pg 373 of 448]
Correction 60:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-Orifice is not called out on plans, Sht C4.07.
[Storm Report; Pg 373 of 448]
Correction 61:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Please ADD BMPS C102, C107, C122, C150, C151, C152, C153, C209, and C241.
[Storm Report; Pg 380 of 448]
Correction 62:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE to reflect current WQ desgn approach.
[Storm Report; Pg 382 of 448]
Correction 63:
See Document Markup
Comments:
SEE comments in Section 2.1.
[Storm Report; Pg 382 of 448]
Correction 64:
See Document Markup
Comments:
SEE comments in Section 1.2.1.
[Storm Report; Pg 382 of 448]
Correction 65:
See Document Markup
Comments:
SEE comments in Section 2.2.
[Storm Report; Pg 383 of 448]
Correction 66:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Please add BMP C102.
[Storm Report; Pg 383 of 448]
Correction 67:
See Document Markup
Comments:
FYI-It is more than a mile to the Puyallup River along the project's release route which includes the Pioneer Way north ditch and main stem of Deer Creek.
[Storm Report; Pg 6 of 448]
Correction 68:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Please add BMP C107.
[Storm Report; Pg 384 of 448]
Correction 69:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add: "Baker Tank sizing calculations included in the CFG Permit PRGR20230972.
[Storm Report; Pg 384 of 448]
Correction 70:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add BMP C241 and state "sediment pond sizing calculations included in the CFG Permit PRGR20230972.
[Storm Report; Pg 384 of 448]
Correction 71:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Please add "and dust control".
[Storm Report; Pg 384 of 448]
Correction 72:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add BMPs C120, 121, 123, and C140.
[Storm Report; Pg 384 of 448]
Correction 73:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Please add BMP C209.
[Storm Report; Pg 385 of 448]
Correction 74:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add: "(if approved by the AHJ)".
[Storm Report; Pg 385 of 448]
Correction 75:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add: "(if approved by the AHJ)".
[Storm Report; Pg 385 of 448]
Correction 76:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Please add: "Clean dewatering water shall not be routed through stormwater sediment ponds."
[Storm Report; Pg 385 of 448]
Correction 77:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Please REVISE to "TBD".
[Storm Report; Pg 388 of 448]
Correction 78:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Please ADD BMPS C102, C107, C122, C150, C151, C152, C153, C209, and C241.
[Storm Report; Pg 389 of 448]
Correction 79:
See Document Markup
Comments:
List the Pollution Prevention Team, their title, and contact info for the project. For persons yet to be determined, use "TBD".
[Storm Report; Pg 390 of 448]
Correction 80:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide Monitoring and Sampling criteria...for reference, see Ecology's CSWPPP template.
[Storm Report; Pg 390 of 448]
Correction 81:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add Note-"Caution: Protect Existing Watermain During Construction".
[Storm Report; Pg 392 of 448]
Correction 82:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add Note-"Caution: Protect Existing Storm Main During Construction".
[Storm Report; Pg 392 of 448]
Correction 83:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Include filter sock detail also.
[CSWPPP; 393 of 448]
Correction 84:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Please ADD BMPS C102, C107, C122, C150, C151, C152, C153, C209, and C241.
[Storm Report; Pg 400 of 448]
Correction 85:
See Document Markup
Comments:
These conditions were for the design team's information on the previous review and do not have to be included on the civil plans. Up to the EoR discretion whether to remove or include on the planset.
[Plans Sht C0.0; Pg 1 of 63]
Correction 86:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-0420264021.
[Plans Sht C0.0; Pg 1 of 63]
Correction 87:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-0420264053.
[Plans Sht C0.0; Pg 1 of 63]
Correction 88:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-0420264054.
[Plans Sht C0.0; Pg 1 of 63]
Correction 89:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-Generator or Trash Enclosure?
[Plans Sht C0.0; Pg 1 of 63]
Correction 90:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CLARIFY-Trash Enclosure?
[Plans Sht C0.0; Pg 1 of 63]
Correction 91:
See Document Markup
Comments:
City Standards require a minimum 3ft of cover over CPEP pipe (ref. City Stds 204.4(3)). The City is willing to allow minimum cover of 30in, but staff cannot support a further reduction based on City regulations. If it is still desired to use CPEP with less than 30in of cover, a formal Alternative Methods Request (AMR) application must be submitted for review and formal decision by the City Engineer. Please be aware that cost savings cannot be a justification to deviate from City Standards.
[Plans Sht C0.0; Pg 1 of 63]
Correction 92:
See Document Markup
Comments:
ADD CFG application number-PRGR20230972.
[Plans Sht C1.0; Pg 2 of 63]
Correction 93:
See Document Markup
Comments:
ADD-CFG application number-PRGR20230972.
[Plans Sht C1.0; Pg 2 of 63]
Correction 94:
See Document Markup
Comments:
ADD Note-Portion of existing watermain to be rerouted.
[Plans Sht C1.0; Pg 2 of 63]
Correction 95:
See Document Markup
Comments:
OK to use detail...please remove title block info.
[Plans Sht C1.1; Pg 3 of 63]
Correction 96:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-drive aisle width with Fire Code Official.
[Plans Sht C2.1; Pg 4 of 63]
Correction 97:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-min. gate opening width serving trash and recycling is 25ft and min depth of enclosure is 12ft. See City Stds 208.1.
[Plans Sht C2.1; Pg 4 of 63]
Correction 98:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CLARIFY-generator area or trash enclosure? If trash enclosure, see City Stds 208.1 for enclosure req'ts.
[Plans Sht C2.1; Pg 4 of 63]
Correction 99:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout drive aisle width.
[Plans Sht C2.2; Pg 5 of 63]
Correction 100:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-min. gate opening width serving trash and recycling is 25ft. See City Stds 208.1(3).
[Plans Sht C2.2; Pg 5 of 63]
Correction 101:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-C2.1?
[Plans Sht C2.3; Pg 6 of 63]
Correction 102:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-C2.4?
[Plans Sht C2.3; Pg 6 of 63]
Correction 103:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout drive aisle width.
[Plans Sht C2.3; Pg 6 of 63]
Correction 104:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-drive aisle width with Fire Code Official.
[Plans Sht C2.3; Pg 6 of 63]
Correction 105:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-C2.2?
[Plans Sht C2.4; Pg 7 of 63]
Correction 106:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-C2.3?
[Plans Sht C2.4; Pg 7 of 63]
Correction 107:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add Note-"Walls over 4'-0" require separate building permit."
[Plans Sht C2.5; Pg 8 of 63]
Correction 108:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CLARIFY.
[Plans Sht C2.6; Pg 9 of 63]
Correction 109:
See Document Markup
Comments:
FYI-if this distance is less than 5ft (btwn landing and back of curb), then the DWS is req'd at the bottom of the ramp.
[Plans Sht C2.6; Pg 9 of 63]
Correction 110:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Delineate the regulated floodplain per the LOMR, Effective September 8, 2022.
[Plans Sht C3.1; Pg 10 of 63]
Correction 111:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT- Rim Elevation.
[Plans Sht C3.2; Pg 11 of 63]
Correction 112:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT- Rim Elevation.
[Plans Sht C3.2; Pg 11 of 63]
Correction 113:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Delineate the regulated floodplain per the LOMR, Effective September 8, 2022.
[Plans Sht C3.3; Pg 12 of 63]
Correction 114:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Delineate the regulated floodplain per the LOMR, Effective September 8, 2022.
[Plans Sht C3.4; Pg 13 of 63]
Correction 115:
See Document Markup
Comments:
RELOCATE-Phase line to top of pond.
[Plans Sht C3.4; Pg 13 of 63]
Correction 116:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-Existing storm pond serving properties to the south to be protected and remain in service until Phase 2.
[Plans Sht C3.4; Pg 13 of 63]
Correction 117:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-to protect existing storm drain serving properties to the south.
[Plans Sht C3.4; Pg 13 of 63]
Correction 118:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-Sheet callout (C4.07?).
[Plans Sht C4.01; Pg 14 of 63]
Correction 119:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Sht Ref C4.0X? (Typ).
Correction 120:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Delineate the regulated floodplain per the LOMR, Effective September 8, 2022.
[Plans Sht C4.01; Pg 14 of 63]
Correction 121:
See Document Markup
Comments:
ADD-WQ Rim and inlet elevation info.
[Plans Sht C4.01; Pg 14 of 63]
Correction 122:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-City Stds 204.3(4) requires min 12in dia pipe for mains. Revise accordingly.
[Plans Sht C4.01; Pg 14 of 63]
Correction 123:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-City Stds 204.3(4) requires min 12in dia pipe for mains. Revise accordingly.
[Plans Sht C4.01; Pg 14 of 63]
Correction 124:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-City Stds 204.3(4) requires min 12in dia pipe for mains. Revise accordingly.
[Plans Sht C4.01; Pg 14 of 63]
Correction 125:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-to 12" dia. per Stds 204.3(4) (south).
[Plans Sht C4.01; Pg 14 of 63]
Correction 126:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-to 12" dia. per Stds 204.3(4) (S & N).
[Plans Sht C4.01; Pg 14 of 63]
Correction 127:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-pipe info (size, mat'l, slope). Use ductile iron per City Stds 204.4.
[Plans Sht C4.01; Pg 14 of 63]
Correction 128:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-DI pipe due to shallow bury.
[Plans Sht C4.01; Pg 14 of 63]
Correction 129:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-to 12" dia. per Stds 204.3(4) (north).
[Plans Sht C4.01; Pg 14 of 63]
Correction 130:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-Profile 5/C4.06 (and 6/C4.06)?
[Plans Sht C4.01; Pg 14 of 63]
Correction 131:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-C4.07?
[Plans Sht C4.01; Pg 14 of 63]
Correction 132:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CLARIFY-generator area or trash enclosure? If trash enclosure, see City Stds 208.1 for enclosure req'ts.
[Plans Sht C2.1; Pg 4 of 63]
Correction 133:
See Document Markup
Comments:
City Standards require a minimum 3ft of cover over CPEP pipe (ref. City Stds 204.4(3)). The City is willing to allow minimum cover of 30in, but staff cannot support a further reduction based on City regulations. If it is still desired to use CPEP with less than 30in of cover, a formal Alternative Methods Request (AMR) application must be submitted for review and formal decision by the City Engineer. Please be aware that cost savings cannot be a justification to deviate from City Standards.
[Plans Sht C4.01; Pg 14 of 63]
Correction 134:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-Sheet callout (C4.07?).
[Plans Sht C4.02; Pg 15 of 63]
Correction 135:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide utility crossing information.
[Plans Sht C4.02; Pg 15 of 63]
Correction 136:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-C4.07?
[Plans Sht C4.02; Pg 15 of 63]
Correction 137:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-Solid locking lid for WQ purposes?
[Plans Sht C4.02; Pg 15 of 63]
Correction 138:
See Document Markup
Comments:
FYI-French Drain construction was removed from the CFG planset and pushed to the civil set.
[Plans Sht C4.02; Pg 15 of 63]
Correction 139:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-Rim and IE info.
[Plans Sht C4.02; Pg 15 of 63]
Correction 140:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-DI pipe due to shallow bury.
[Plans Sht C4.02; Pg 15 of 63]
Correction 141:
See Document Markup
Comments:
ADD-WQ5 Inlet info.
[Plans Sht C4.02; Pg 15 of 63]
Correction 142:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-pipe info (size, mat'l, slope).
[Plans Sht C4.02; Pg 15 of 63]
Correction 143:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-top elevations with Sht C4.21. (Also, see Control Riser comments, Sht C4.07).
[Plans Sht C4.02; Pg 15 of 63]
Correction 144:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-pipe slope w/ IEs.
[Plans Sht C4.02; Pg 15 of 63]
Correction 145:
See Document Markup
Comments:
ADD-WQ Rim and outlet elevation info.
[Plans Sht C4.02; Pg 15 of 63]
Correction 146:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-Profile 5/C4.06 (and 6/C4.06)?
[Plans Sht C4.02; Pg 15 of 63]
Correction 147:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-12" dia req'd.
[Plans Sht C4.02; Pg 15 of 63]
Correction 148:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Delineate the regulated floodplain per the LOMR, Effective September 8, 2022.
[Plans Sht C4.03; Pg 16 of 63]
Correction 149:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-Sheet callout (C4.07?).
[Plans Sht C4.03; Pg 16 of 63]
Correction 150:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-Pipe Info (Size, Mat'l, Slope).
[Plans Sht C4.03; Pg 16 of 63]
Correction 151:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-Pipe Info (Size, Mat'l, Slope).
[Plans Sht C4.03; Pg 16 of 63]
Correction 152:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CLARIFY-Phase 2 install?
[Plans Sht C4.03; Pg 16 of 63]
Correction 153:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CONFIRM-Material callout.
[Plans Sht C4.03; Pg 16 of 63]
Correction 154:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-to protect existing storm drain serving properties to the south.
[Plans Sht C4.03; Pg 16 of 63]
Correction 155:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide utility crossing information.
[Plans Sht C4.03; Pg 16 of 63]
Correction 156:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-Sheet callout (C4.07?).
[Plans Sht C4.04; Pg 17 of 63]
Correction 157:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-pipe size.
[Plans Sht C4.04; Pg 17 of 63]
Correction 158:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-pipe info (size and slope). Also, coordinate with Sht C4.31.
[Plans Sht C4.04; Pg 17 of 63]
Correction 159:
See Document Markup
Comments:
ADD-RTank 3 inlets #1, 3, and 4 with IEs.
[Plans Sht C4.04; Pg 17 of 63]
Correction 160:
See Document Markup
Comments:
ADD-SDCO#D1 structure details.
[Plans Sht C4.04; Pg 17 of 63]
Correction 161:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-DI pipe due to shallow bury.
[Plans Sht C4.04; Pg 17 of 63]
Correction 162:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-Existing storm pond serving properties to the south to be protected and remain in service until Phase 2.
[Plans Sht C4.04; Pg 17 of 63]
Correction 163:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-to protect existing storm drain serving properties to the south.
[Plans Sht C4.04; Pg 17 of 63]
Correction 164:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide utility crossing information.
[Plans Sht C4.04; Pg 17 of 63]
Correction 165:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Pipe to east?
[Plans Sht C4.05; Pg 18 of 63]
Correction 166:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CONFIRM-storm elev...if separation is less than 1ft (must be 6in min), then use ethafoam pad btwn the pipes.
[Plans Sht C4.05; Pg 18 of 63]
Correction 167:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-SDCB#40 info (type, rim and IE).
[Plans Sht C4.05; Pg 18 of 63]
Correction 168:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-DI pipe due to shallow bury.
[Plans Sht C4.05; Pg 18 of 63]
Correction 169:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-water crossing?
[Plans Sht C4.05; Pg 18 of 63]
Correction 170:
See Document Markup
Comments:
ADD-structure info.
[Plans Sht C4.05; Pg 18 of 63]
Correction 171:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Readability.
[Plans Sht C4.05; Pg 18 of 63]
Correction 172:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CONFIRM-storm elev.
[Plans Sht C4.05; Pg 18 of 63]
Correction 173:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show sewer and provide crossing info.
[Plans Sht C4.06; Pg 19 of 63]
Correction 174:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout IE (2 plcs).
[Plans Sht C4.06; Pg 19 of 63]
Correction 175:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Pipe to south?
[Plans Sht C4.06; Pg 19 of 63]
Correction 176:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Phase 2 Stub?
[Plans Sht C4.06; Pg 19 of 63]
Correction 177:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show existing storm main and provide crossing information.
[Plans Sht C4.06; Pg 19 of 63]
Correction 178:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per comments on C4.01, revise to 12" dia. per Stds 204.3(4) (north).
[Plans Sht C4.06; Pg 19 of 63]
Correction 179:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-fabric overlap reqts.
[Plans Sht C4.07; Pg 20 of 63]
Correction 180:
See Document Markup
Comments:
ADD-City Standard Details 02.01.05 // 02.01.09.
[Plans Sht C4.07; Pg 20 of 63]
Correction 181:
See Document Markup
Comments:
60in.
[Plans Sht C4.07; Pg 20 of 63]
Correction 182:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-1.5 per Storm Report, Pg 372 of 448.
[Plans Sht C4.07; Pg 20 of 63]
Correction 183:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-It appears to be El. 73.32 noted on Sht. C4.21 (5ft of live storage per calcs-which places riser top at El. 73.40). However, RTank 3 top of storage is El. 75.23. It appears that as RTank 3 fills, RTank 2 will go into overflow before RTank 3 storage is fully utilized. If riser top is intended to be El. 75.25, then RTank 2 appears to be in a surcharged condition.
[Plans Sht C4.07; Pg 20 of 63]
Correction 184:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-24in used in calcs per Storm Report, Pg 372 of 448.
[Plans Sht C4.07; Pg 20 of 63]
Correction 185:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-1.25 per Storm Report, Pg 372 of 448.
[Plans Sht C4.07; Pg 20 of 63]
Correction 186:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-18in used in calcs per Storm Report, Pg 373 of 448.
[Plans Sht C4.07; Pg 20 of 63]
Correction 187:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-It appears to be El. 70.88 noted on Sht. C4.11 (2ft of live storage per calcs-which places riser top at El 69.40). Also, there are a number of CB rims below this elevation.
[Plans Sht C4.07; Pg 20 of 63]
Correction 188:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-2.25 per Storm Report, Pg 373 of 448.
[Plans Sht C4.07; Pg 20 of 63]
Correction 189:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-1.25ft above IE per calcs in Storm Report, Pg 373 of 448.
[Plans Sht C4.07; Pg 20 of 63]
Correction 190:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY- calcs callout a 3rd orifice on the control riser per Storm Report, Pg 373 of 448.
[Plans Sht C4.07; Pg 20 of 63]
Correction 191:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CLARIFY-whether the optional drain down device will be implemented. (See GULD Para 3)
[Plans Sht C4.08; Pg 21 of 63]
Correction 192:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CONFIRM-IE w Sht C4.02.
[Plans Sht C4.08; Pg 21 of 63]
Correction 193:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CONFIRM-12in per Sht C4.02.
[Plans Sht C4.08; Pg 21 of 63]
Correction 194:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CONFIRM-12in per Sht C4.02.
[Plans Sht C4.08; Pg 21 of 63]
Correction 195:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Legibility.
[Plans Sht C4.08; Pg 21 of 63]
Correction 196:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CLARIFY-whether the optional drain down device will be implemented. (See GULD Para 3)
[Plans Sht C4.09; Pg 22 of 63]
Correction 197:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Legibility.
[Plans Sht C4.09; Pg 22 of 63]
Correction 198:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Legibility.
[Plans Sht C4.10; Pg 23 of 63]
Correction 199:
See Document Markup
Comments:
PROVIDE-2yr and 10yr water surface elevations on the cross section.
[Plans Sht C4.11; Pg 24 of 63]
Correction 200:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Legibility.
[Plans Sht C4.11; Pg 24 of 63]
Correction 201:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Legibility.
[Plans Sht C4.12; Pg 25 of 63]
Correction 202:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Legibility.
[Plans Sht C4.13; Pg 26 of 63]
Correction 203:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Legibility.
[Plans Sht C4.14; Pg 27 of 63]
Correction 204:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Legibility.
[Plans Sht C4.15; Pg 28 of 63]
Correction 205:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Legibility.
[Plans Sht C4.16; Pg 29 of 63]
Correction 206:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-manufactured 30mil (min) impermeable liner to prevent groundwater intrusion.
[Plans Sht C4.17; Pg 30 of 63]
Correction 207:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Legibility.
[Plans Sht C4.17; Pg 30 of 63]
Correction 208:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Legibility.
[Plans Sht C4.20; Pg 31 of 63]
Correction 209:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CLARIFY- See Control Structure comments on Sht C4.07, and riser comments in Storm Report, Pg 372 of 448.
[Plans Sht C4.21; Pg 32 of 63]
Correction 210:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CLARIFY- See storage volume required comments in Storm Report, Pg 372 of 448.
[Plans Sht C4.21; Pg 32 of 63]
Correction 211:
See Document Markup
Comments:
PROVIDE-2yr and 10yr water surface elevations on the cross section.
[Plans Sht C4.21; Pg 32 of 63]
Correction 212:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Legibility.
[Plans Sht C4.21; Pg 32 of 63]
Correction 213:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Legibility.
[Plans Sht C4.22; Pg 33 of 63]
Correction 214:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Legibility.
[Plans Sht C4.23; Pg 34 of 63]
Correction 215:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Legibility.
[Plans Sht C4.24; Pg 35 of 63]
Correction 216:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Legibility.
[Plans Sht C4.25; Pg 36 of 63]
Correction 217:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Legibility.
[Plans Sht C4.26; Pg 37 of 63]
Correction 218:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-manufactured 30mil (min) impermeable liner to prevent groundwater intrusion.
[Plans Sht C4.27; Pg 38 of 63]
Correction 219:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Legibility.
[Plans Sht C4.27; Pg 38 of 63]
Correction 220:
See Document Markup
Comments:
COORDINATE with Sht C4.03.
[Plans Sht C4.30; Pg 39 of 63]
Correction 221:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Legibility.
[Plans Sht C4.30; Pg 39 of 63]
Correction 222:
See Document Markup
Comments:
COORDINATE with Sht C4.04.
[Plans Sht C4.31; Pg 40 of 63]
Correction 223:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CLARIFY- See Control Structure comments on Sht C4.07, and riser comments in Storm Report, Pg 372 of 448.
[Plans Sht C4.31; Pg 40 of 63]
Correction 224:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CLARIFY- See storage volume required comments in Storm Report, Pg 372 of 448.
[Plans Sht C4.31; Pg 40 of 63]
Correction 225:
See Document Markup
Comments:
PROVIDE-2yr and 10yr water surface elevations on the cross section.
[Plans Sht C4.31; Pg 40 of 63]
Correction 226:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Legibility.
[Plans Sht C4.31; Pg 40 of 63]
Correction 227:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Legibility.
[Plans Sht C4.32; Pg 41 of 63]
Correction 228:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Legibility.
[Plans Sht C4.33; Pg 42 of 63]
Correction 229:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Legibility.
[Plans Sht C4.34; Pg 43 of 63]
Correction 230:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-manufactured 30mil (min) impermeable liner to prevent groundwater intrusion.
[Plans Sht C4.35; Pg 44 of 63]
Correction 231:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Legibility.
[Plans Sht C4.35; Pg 44 of 63]
Correction 232:
See Document Markup
Comments:
PROVIDE-grease interceptor sizing calculations (750 gal min) for both GIs.
[Plans Sht C5.01; Pg 45 of 63]
Correction 233:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Service lateral exceeds max. grade (8% max). Revise accordingly.
[Plans Sht C5.01; Pg 45 of 63]
Correction 234:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-exceeds max allowable slope (8%).
[Plans Sht C5.01; Pg 45 of 63]
Correction 235:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-drop manhole.
[Plans Sht C5.01; Pg 45 of 63]
Correction 236:
See Document Markup
Comments:
See comment on plan.
[Plans Sht C5.01; Pg 45 of 63]
Correction 237:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-min. 10ft of straight pipe on inlet side of GI (ref. City Stds 402.3(8).
[Plans Sht C5.01; Pg 45 of 63]
Correction 238:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-show tee on downstream side of GI (ref. City Stds 402.3(9).
[Plans Sht C5.01; Pg 45 of 63]
Correction 239:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-sampling connection per City Std Detail 04.03.04.
[Plans Sht C5.01; Pg 45 of 63]
Correction 240:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-sheet reference (C5.5?).
[Plans Sht C5.01; Pg 45 of 63]
Correction 241:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout?
[Plans Sht C5.01; Pg 45 of 63]
Correction 242:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-cleanout and IE.
[Plans Sht C5.01; Pg 45 of 63]
Correction 243:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-min. 10ft separation btwn sewer and foundation(s).
[Plans Sht C5.01; Pg 45 of 63]
Correction 244:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-sampling connection per City Std Detail 04.03.04.
[Plans Sht C5.01; Pg 45 of 63]
Correction 245:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-sheet reference (C5.5?).
[Plans Sht C5.01; Pg 45 of 63]
Correction 246:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-PVC per record drawings. (Permit E21-0426).
[Plans Sht C5.01; Pg 45 of 63]
Correction 247:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-DI per record drawings. (Permit E21-0426).
[Plans Sht C5.01; Pg 45 of 63]
Correction 248:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-cleanout and IE.
[Plans Sht C5.01; Pg 45 of 63]
Correction 249:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-show tee on downstream side of GI (ref. City Stds 402.3(9).
[Plans Sht C5.01; Pg 45 of 63]
Correction 250:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-min. 10ft separation btwn sewer and foundation(s).
[Plans Sht C5.01; Pg 45 of 63]
Correction 251:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-DI pipe due to shallow bury.
[Plans Sht C5.01; Pg 45 of 63]
Correction 252:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-DI pipe due to shallow bury.
[Plans Sht C5.01; Pg 45 of 63]
Correction 253:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-Record Dwgs indicate this connection as a simple tie-in to an existing stub...no structure.
[Plans Sht C5.01; Pg 45 of 63]
Correction 254:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide utility crossing information.
[Plans Sht C5.02; Pg 46 of 63]
Correction 255:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Service lateral exceeds max. grade (8% max). Revise accordingly.
[Plans Sht C5.02; Pg 46 of 63]
Correction 256:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-structure type and grate.
[Plans Sht C5.02; Pg 46 of 63]
Correction 257:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-side sewer IE.
[Plans Sht C5.02; Pg 46 of 63]
Correction 258:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-pipe info (size, mat'l, slope).
[Plans Sht C5.02; Pg 46 of 63]
Correction 259:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout?
[Plans Sht C5.02; Pg 46 of 63]
Correction 260:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Readability.
[Plans Sht C5.02; Pg 46 of 63]
Correction 261:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-PVC per record drawings. (Permit E21-0426).
[Plans Sht C5.02; Pg 46 of 63]
Correction 262:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-sampling connection per City Std Detail 04.03.04.
[Plans Sht C5.02; Pg 46 of 63]
Correction 263:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-sampling connection per City Std Detail 04.03.04.
[Plans Sht C5.02; Pg 46 of 63]
Correction 264:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide utility crossing information.
[Plans Sht C5.03; Pg 47 of 63]
Correction 265:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Service lateral exceeds max. grade (8% max). Revise accordingly.
[Plans Sht C5.03; Pg 47 of 63]
Correction 266:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-sampling connection per City Std Detail 04.03.04.
[Plans Sht C5.03; Pg 47 of 63]
Correction 267:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-sampling connection per City Std Detail 04.03.04.
[Plans Sht C5.03; Pg 47 of 63]
Correction 268:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-sampling connection per City Std Detail 04.03.04.
[Plans Sht C5.03; Pg 47 of 63]
Correction 269:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide utility crossing information.
[Plans Sht C5.04; Pg 48 of 63]
Correction 270:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Service lateral exceeds max. grade (8% max). Revise accordingly.
[Plans Sht C5.04; Pg 48 of 63]
Correction 271:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-sampling connection per City Std Detail 04.03.04.
[Plans Sht C5.04; Pg 48 of 63]
Correction 272:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-sampling connection per City Std Detail 04.03.04.
[Plans Sht C5.04; Pg 48 of 63]
Correction 273:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout?
[Plans Sht C5.04; Pg 48 of 63]
Correction 274:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout?
[Plans Sht C5.04; Pg 48 of 63]
Correction 275:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-sampling connection per City Std Detail 04.03.04.
[Plans Sht C5.04; Pg 48 of 63]
Correction 276:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-sampling connection per City Std Detail 04.03.04.
[Plans Sht C5.04; Pg 48 of 63]
Correction 277:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-sampling connection per City Std Detail 04.03.04.
[Plans Sht C5.04; Pg 48 of 63]
Correction 278:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-sampling connection per City Std Detail 04.03.04.
[Plans Sht C5.04; Pg 48 of 63]
Correction 279:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-per comment Sht C5.02.
[Plans Sht C5.05; Pg 49 of 63]
Correction 280:
See Document Markup
Comments:
PROVIDE-utility crossing info.
[Plans Sht C5.05; Pg 49 of 63]
Correction 281:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-drop manhole per City Std Detail 04.01.02.
[Plans Sht C5.05; Pg 49 of 63]
Correction 282:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-per comment Sht C5.01.
[Plans Sht C5.05; Pg 49 of 63]
Correction 283:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-pipe run with Sht C5.03.
[Plans Sht C5.06; Pg 50 of 63]
Correction 284:
See Document Markup
Comments:
PROVIDE-utility crossing info (exist'g SD and new sewer).
[Plans Sht C5.06; Pg 50 of 63]
Correction 285:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-per comment Sht C5.02.
[Plans Sht C5.06; Pg 50 of 63]
Correction 286:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-pipe length with Sht C5.04.
[Plans Sht C5.06; Pg 50 of 63]
Correction 287:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-per comment Sht C5.02.
[Plans Sht C5.06; Pg 50 of 63]
Correction 288:
See Document Markup
Comments:
PROVIDE-utility crossing info.
[Plans Sht C5.07; Pg 51 of 63]
Correction 289:
See Document Markup
Comments:
ADD-City Std Detail 04.03.04 // 04.06.02
[Plans Sht C5.5; Pg 52 of 63]
Correction 290:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-sheet callout (C5.08?).
[Plans Sht C5.5; Pg 52 of 63]
Correction 291:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-sheet callout (C6.08?). (4 plcs)
[Plans Sht C6.01; Pg 53 of 63]
Correction 292:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-sheet callout (C6.09?). (5 plcs)
[Plans Sht C6.01; Pg 53 of 63]
Correction 293:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-sheet callout (C6.10?). (3 plcs)
[Plans Sht C6.01; Pg 53 of 63]
Correction 294:
See Document Markup
Comments:
ADD NOTE: Wet taps to existing water mains shall be accomplished through a tapping tee and tapping valve and shall be made by a city approved contractor. The tapping sleeve shall be Romac SST all stainless steel tapping sleeve or approved equal. A two-piece epoxy coated or ductile iron tapping sleeve may be used on ductile iron pipe, when the tap is smaller than the water main size i.e. 6-inch tap on 8-inch pipe. The City shall approve the time and location for these connections.
[Plans Sht C6.01; Pg 53 of 63]
Correction 295:
See Document Markup
Comments:
ADD NOTE: If the project is utilizing a fire booster pump, the FDC must connect to the sprinkler system on the discharge side of the pump in accordance with NFPA regulations.).
[Plans Sht C6.01; Pg 53 of 63]
Correction 296:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-and show thrust block.
[Plans Sht C6.01; Pg 53 of 63]
Correction 297:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-Sheet Ref (C6.03).
[Plans Sht C6.01; Pg 53 of 63]
Correction 298:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-and show thrust block.
[Plans Sht C6.01; Pg 53 of 63]
Correction 299:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-8x8 wet tap.
[Plans Sht C6.01; Pg 53 of 63]
Correction 300:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-8in GV.
[Plans Sht C6.01; Pg 53 of 63]
Correction 301:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-Sheet Ref (C6.02).
[Plans Sht C6.01; Pg 53 of 63]
Correction 302:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-PIV and DDCVA.
[Plans Sht C6.01; Pg 53 of 63]
Correction 303:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-sheet reference (C6.10?).
[Plans Sht C6.01; Pg 53 of 63]
Correction 304:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-and show 2in GV.
[Plans Sht C6.01; Pg 53 of 63]
Correction 305:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-callout 2" per City Std Detail 03.03.02.
[Plans Sht C6.01; Pg 53 of 63]
Correction 306:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-sheet reference (C6.10?).
[Plans Sht C6.01; Pg 53 of 63]
Correction 307:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-callout 1" per City Std Detail 03.03.01.
[Plans Sht C6.01; Pg 53 of 63]
Correction 308:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-PIV and DDCVA.
[Plans Sht C6.01; Pg 53 of 63]
Correction 309:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-Sheet Ref (C6.04).
[Plans Sht C6.02; Pg 54 of 63]
Correction 310:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-and show 8in GV.
[Plans Sht C6.02; Pg 54 of 63]
Correction 311:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-and show 2in GV.
[Plans Sht C6.02; Pg 54 of 63]
Correction 312:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-and show DCVA backflow device.
[Plans Sht C6.02; Pg 54 of 63]
Correction 313:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-callout 2" per City Std Detail 03.03.02.
[Plans Sht C6.02; Pg 54 of 63]
Correction 314:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-and show 6in GV and thrust block.
[Plans Sht C6.02; Pg 54 of 63]
Correction 315:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-PIV and DDCVA.
[Plans Sht C6.02; Pg 54 of 63]
Correction 316:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-and show 8in GV and thrust block.
[Plans Sht C6.02; Pg 54 of 63]
Correction 317:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-PIV and DDCVA.
[Plans Sht C6.02; Pg 54 of 63]
Correction 318:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-fitting and thrust block.
[Plans Sht C6.02; Pg 54 of 63]
Correction 319:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-Sheet Ref (C6.01).
[Plans Sht C6.02; Pg 54 of 63]
Correction 320:
See Document Markup
Comments:
ADD NOTE: Wet taps to existing water mains shall be accomplished through a tapping tee and tapping valve and shall be made by a city approved contractor. The tapping sleeve shall be Romac SST all stainless steel tapping sleeve or approved equal. A two-piece epoxy coated or ductile iron tapping sleeve may be used on ductile iron pipe, when the tap is smaller than the water main size i.e. 6-inch tap on 8-inch pipe. The City shall approve the time and location for these connections.
[Plans Sht C6.02; Pg 54 of 63]
Correction 321:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-and show thrust block.
[Plans Sht C6.02; Pg 54 of 63]
Correction 322:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-and show 8in GV and thrust block.
[Plans Sht C6.02; Pg 54 of 63]
Correction 323:
See Document Markup
Comments:
See comments Sht C6.01.
[Plans Sht C6.02; Pg 54 of 63]
Correction 324:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-and show 2in GV.
[Plans Sht C6.02; Pg 54 of 63]
Correction 325:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-callout 2" per City Std Detail 03.03.02.
[Plans Sht C6.02; Pg 54 of 63]
Correction 326:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-and show 6in GV.
[Plans Sht C6.02; Pg 54 of 63]
Correction 327:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-and show 6in GV.
[Plans Sht C6.02; Pg 54 of 63]
Correction 328:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-callout 2" per City Std Detail 03.03.02.
[Plans Sht C6.02; Pg 54 of 63]
Correction 329:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-and show DCVA backflow device.
[Plans Sht C6.02; Pg 54 of 63]
Correction 330:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-PIV and DDCVA.
[Plans Sht C6.02; Pg 54 of 63]
Correction 331:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-PIV and DDCVA.
[Plans Sht C6.02; Pg 54 of 63]
Correction 332:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-and show 2in GV.
[Plans Sht C6.02; Pg 54 of 63]
Correction 333:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-to abandon rerouted existing watermain.
[Plans Sht C6.02; Pg 54 of 63]
Correction 334:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-sheet reference (C6.06?).
[Plans Sht C6.02; Pg 54 of 63]
Correction 335:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-and show DCVA backflow device.
[Plans Sht C6.02; Pg 54 of 63]
Correction 336:
See Document Markup
Comments:
See comments Sht C6.01.
[Plans Sht C6.03; Pg 55 of 63]
Correction 337:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-callout 2" per City Std Detail 03.03.02.
[Plans Sht C6.03; Pg 55 of 63]
Correction 338:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-use blowoff assembly.
[Plans Sht C6.03; Pg 55 of 63]
Correction 339:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-and show DCVA backflow device.
[Plans Sht C6.03; Pg 55 of 63]
Correction 340:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-and show DCVA backflow device.
[Plans Sht C6.03; Pg 55 of 63]
Correction 341:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-Sheet Ref (C6.01).
[Plans Sht C6.03; Pg 55 of 63]
Correction 342:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-Sheet Ref (C6.04).
[Plans Sht C6.03; Pg 55 of 63]
Correction 343:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CONFIRM-hydrant run with the hydraulic model (max run 20ft w/o modeling).
[Plans Sht C6.03; Pg 55 of 63]
Correction 344:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-and show thrust block.
[Plans Sht C6.03; Pg 55 of 63]
Correction 345:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-and show 2in GV.
[Plans Sht C6.03; Pg 55 of 63]
Correction 346:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-and show 2in GV.
[Plans Sht C6.03; Pg 55 of 63]
Correction 347:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-callout 2" per City Std Detail 03.03.02.
[Plans Sht C6.03; Pg 55 of 63]
Correction 348:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-Sheet Ref (C6.03).
[Plans Sht C6.04; Pg 56 of 63]
Correction 349:
See Document Markup
Comments:
See comments Sht C6.01.
[Plans Sht C6.04; Pg 56 of 63]
Correction 350:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-and show thrust block.
[Plans Sht C6.02; Pg 54 of 63]
Correction 351:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-Sheet Ref (C6.02).
[Plans Sht C6.04; Pg 56 of 63]
Correction 352:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-and show DCVA backflow device.
[Plans Sht C6.04; Pg 56 of 63]
Correction 353:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-callout 2" per City Std Detail 03.03.02.
[Plans Sht C6.04; Pg 56 of 63]
Correction 354:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-and show 2in GV.
[Plans Sht C6.04; Pg 56 of 63]
Correction 355:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-callout 2" per City Std Detail 03.03.02.
[Plans Sht C6.04; Pg 56 of 63]
Correction 356:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-and show DCVA backflow device.
[Plans Sht C6.04; Pg 56 of 63]
Correction 357:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-PIV and DDCVA.
[Plans Sht C6.04; Pg 56 of 63]
Correction 358:
See Document Markup
Comments:
ADD-ethafoam detail to plan set.
[Plans Sht C6.01; Pg 53 of 63]
Correction 359:
See Document Markup
Comments:
ADD NOTE-"See Ethafoam Detail and City Std Detail 03.01.03-1 & 2 for utility crossing req'ts.".
[Plans Sht C6.05; Pg 57 of 63]
Correction 360:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-8in GV.
[Plans Sht C6.05; Pg 57 of 63]
Correction 361:
See Document Markup
Comments:
If utility crossings are less than 12in, provide Etha Foam sheet per attached detail.
[Plans Sht C6.05; Pg 57 of 63]
Correction 362:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-water pipe conflicts with storm pipe.
[Plans Sht C6.05; Pg 57 of 63]
Correction 363:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-relocate watermain to provide a min. of 6" clear and install ethafoam per detail. In an effort to avoid the req'ts of Std Detail 03.01.03-1 & 2, it may be in the best interest of the project to relocate the existing watermain to provide adequate separation.
[Plans Sht C6.05; Pg 57 of 63]
Correction 364:
See Document Markup
Comments:
If utility crossings are less than 12in, provide Etha Foam sheet per attached detail.
[Plans Sht C6.05; Pg 57 of 63]
Correction 365:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-callout 2" per City Std Detail 03.03.02.
[Plans Sht C6.05; Pg 57 of 63]
Correction 366:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-callout 1" per City Std Detail 03.03.01.
[Plans Sht C6.01; Pg 53 of 63]
Correction 367:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-callout 2" per City Std Detail 03.03.02.
[Plans Sht C6.06; Pg 58 of 63]
Correction 368:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-6in GV.
[Plans Sht C6.06; Pg 58 of 63]
Correction 369:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-callout 2" per City Std Detail 03.03.02.
[Plans Sht C6.06; Pg 58 of 63]
Correction 370:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-per Sht C6.02 comment.
[Plans Sht C6.06; Pg 58 of 63]
Correction 371:
See Document Markup
Comments:
ADD NOTE-"See Ethafoam Detail and City Std Detail 03.01.03-1 & 2 for utility crossing req'ts.".
[Plans Sht C6.06; Pg 58 of 63]
Correction 372:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-use blowoff assembly.
[Plans Sht C6.06; Pg 58 of 63]
Correction 373:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-callout 2" per City Std Detail 03.03.02.
[Plans Sht C6.06; Pg 58 of 63]
Correction 374:
See Document Markup
Comments:
ADD Note-"See City Std Detail 03.01.03-1 & 2 for crossing criteria."
[Plans Sht C6.06; Pg 58 of 63]
Correction 375:
See Document Markup
Comments:
If utility crossings are less than 12in, provide Etha Foam sheet per attached detail Sht C6.05.
[Plans Sht C6.06; Pg 58 of 63]
Correction 376:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-8x8 wet tap per City Stds 301.1(3).
[Plans Sht C6.06; Pg 58 of 63]
Correction 377:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-8in GV.
[Plans Sht C6.06; Pg 58 of 63]
Correction 378:
See Document Markup
Comments:
ADD Note-"See City Std Detail 03.01.03-1 & 2 for crossing criteria."
[Plans Sht C6.06; Pg 58 of 63]
Correction 379:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-relocate watermain to provide a min. of 6" clear and install ethafoam per detail. In an effort to avoid the req'ts of Std Detail 03.01.03-1 & 2, it may be in the best interest of the project to relocate the existing watermain to provide adequate separation.
[Plans Sht C6.07; Pg 59 of 63]
Correction 380:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-callout 2" per City Std Detail 03.03.02.
[Plans Sht C6.07; Pg 59 of 63]
Correction 381:
See Document Markup
Comments:
ADD NOTE-"See Ethafoam Detail and City Std Detail 03.01.03-1 & 2 for utility crossing req'ts.".
[Plans Sht C6.07; Pg 59 of 63]
Correction 382:
See Document Markup
Comments:
NOTE to ENGR-although Ethafoam was suggested during last review, is AHBL confident that a 24in storm pipe flowing full will not negatively affect the watermain when there is only 6in of separation? In an effort to avoid the req'ts of Std Detail 03.01.03-1 & 2, it may be in the best interest of the project to lower the existing watermain.
[Plans Sht C6.07; Pg 59 of 63]
Correction 383:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-8x8 wet tap.
[Plans Sht C6.07; Pg 59 of 63]
Correction 384:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-callout 2" per City Std Detail 03.03.02.
[Plans Sht C6.07; Pg 59 of 63]
Correction 385:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-water pipe conflicts with storm pipe.
[Plans Sht C6.07; Pg 59 of 63]
Correction 386:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-water elevation callout.
[Plans Sht C6.07; Pg 59 of 63]
Correction 387:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-if 3" water service(s) are anticipated, include City Std Detail 03.03.03 to the planset.
[Plans Sht C6.08; Pg 60 of 63]
Correction 388:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Combine with thrust block details on Sht C6.08.
[Plans Sht C6.09; Pg 61 of 63]
Correction 389:
See Document Markup
Comments:
ADD-City Std Details 03.04.01 // 03.04.03 (if 3" water service(s) are anticipated) // 03.06.01 // 03.11.01.
[Plans Sht C6.10; Pg 62 of 63]
Correction 390:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Please submit the signal planset with the separate and forthcoming Offsite civil application.
[Signal Plans Sht PM-01; Pg 1 of 9]
Correction 391:
See Document Markup
Comments:
City Standards require a minimum 3ft of cover over CPEP pipe (ref. City Stds 204.4(3)). The City is willing to allow minimum cover of 30in, but staff cannot support a further reduction based on City regulations. If it is still desired to use CPEP with less than 30in of cover, a formal Alternative Methods Request (AMR) application must be submitted for review and formal decision by the City Engineer. Please be aware that cost savings cannot be a justification to deviate from City Standards.
[ADS Technical Sheet, Burial Depth of Corrugated HDPE Pipe]
Correction 392:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Revise landscape design to ensure there are no trees within 10ft of underground wet utilities and fire hydrants.
[Landscape Plans Sht L1.0; Pg 1 of 10]
Correction 393:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add: "along the Pioneer Way ditch, then the main stem of Deer Creek before discharging" to the main body of the Puyallup River...or similar language.
[Storm Report; Pg 8 of 821]
Correction 394:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add: "then Deer Creek,"
[Storm Report; Pg 9 of 821]
Correction 395:
See Document Markup
Comments:
FYI Only- 3.20 vs 3.00.
[Storm Report; Pg 17 of 821]
Correction 396:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-Basin 4 total; The quantity is less than last submittal, but the amount of area actually increased with the Phase 2 addition.
[Storm Report; Pg 713 of 821]
Correction 397:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-29,400sf ( 0.67ac).
[Storm Report; Pg 713 of 821]
Correction 398:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-Basin 4 Inputs; see comments on WQ Basin Map, Pg 713.
[Storm Report; Pg 714 of 821]
Correction 399:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per prior comment, coordinate with riser geometry, Sht C4.07. Per ACF cut-sheets, bottom of storage is El. 68.40...for 5.87ft of storage, riser crest would be El. 74.27.
[Storm Report; Pg 719 of 821]
Correction 400:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per prior comment, shouldn't this be El. 100.00 which is the bottom of storage and the invert of the outlet pipe? This elevation places the orifce on the control riser tee.
[Storm Report; Pg 720 of 821]
Correction 401:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-coordinate with riser geometry, Sht C4.07. Bottom of storage is El. 68.40 + 4.25ft = El. 72.65.
[Storm Report; Pg 719 of 821]
Correction 402:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Please emphasize the limits of the regulated floodplain for clarity (per the LOMR, Effective September 8, 2022).
[Plans Sht C3.01; Pg 11 of 53]
Correction 403:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per prior comment- callout Rim Elevation.
[Plans Sht C3.02; Pg 12 of 53]
Correction 404:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Please emphasize the limits of the regulated floodplain for clarity (per the LOMR, Effective September 8, 2022).
[Plans Sht C3.03; Pg 13 of 53]
Correction 405:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Please emphasize the limits of the regulated floodplain for clarity (per the LOMR, Effective September 8, 2022).
[Plans Sht C3.04; Pg 14 of 53]
Correction 406:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per prior comment: RELOCATE-Phase line to top of pond.
[Plans Sht C3.04; Pg 14 of 53]
Correction 407:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per prior comment: CALLOUT-Existing storm pond serving properties to the south to be protected and remain in service until Phase 2.
[Plans Sht C3.04; Pg 14 of 53]
Correction 408:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per prior comment: CALLOUT-to protect existing storm drain serving properties to the south.
[Plans Sht C3.04; Pg 14 of 53]
Correction 409:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-reference.
[Plans Sht C4.01; Pg 15 of 53]
Correction 410:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-reference.
[Plans Sht C4.02; Pg 16 of 53]
Correction 411:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-reference.
[Plans Sht C4.02; Pg 16 of 53]
Correction 412:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-reference.
[Plans Sht C4.02; Pg 16 of 53]
Correction 413:
See Document Markup
Comments:
FYI- structure info called out on Sht C4.04.
[Plans Sht C4.02; Pg 16 of 53]
Correction 414:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-Invert vs pipe slope.
[Plans Sht C4.02; Pg 16 of 53]
Correction 415:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-Pipe slope vs invert.
[Plans Sht C4.02; Pg 16 of 53]
Correction 416:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per prior comment-Provide utility crossing information.
[Plans Sht C4.02; Pg 16 of 53]
Correction 417:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per prior comment-Provide utility crossing information.
[Plans Sht C4.02; Pg 16 of 53]
Correction 418:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-These are RTank 3 values and do not agree with the ACF RTank 2 elevations.
[Plans Sht C4.02; Pg 16 of 53]
Correction 419:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-Is it necessary to have such a large pipe into and out of the control structure?
[Plans Sht C4.02; Pg 16 of 53]
Correction 420:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per prior comment-Provide utility crossing information.
[Plans Sht C4.03; Pg 17 of 53]
Correction 421:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CONFIRM-Type 2 structure req'd.
[Plans Sht C4.03; Pg 17 of 53]
Correction 422:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-reference.
[Plans Sht C4.04; Pg 18 of 53]
Correction 423:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-reference.
[Plans Sht C4.04; Pg 18 of 53]
Correction 424:
See Document Markup
Comments:
FYI- structure not shown on this sheet. Called out on Sht C4.02.
[Plans Sht C4.04; Pg 18 of 53]
Correction 425:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CLARIFY-readability.
[Plans Sht C4.04; Pg 18 of 53]
Correction 426:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-Ethafoam crossing per 3/C6.05.
[Plans Sht C4.05; Pg 19 of 53]
Correction 427:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-Ethafoam crossing per 3/C6.05.
[Plans Sht C4.05; Pg 19 of 53]
Correction 428:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-Ethafoam crossing per 3/C6.05.
[Plans Sht C4.05; Pg 19 of 53]
Correction 429:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-reference.
[Plans Sht C4.06; Pg 20 of 53]
Correction 430:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-Ethafoam crossing per 3/C6.05.
[Plans Sht C4.06; Pg 20 of 53]
Correction 431:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-Ethafoam crossing per 3/C6.05.
[Plans Sht C4.06; Pg 20 of 53]
Correction 432:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-"SDCB01".
[Plans Sht C4.07; Pg 21 of 53]
Correction 433:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per prior comment, shouldn't this be El. 67.40 which is the bottom of storage and the invert of the outlet pipe? El. 67.65 would place the orifce on the tee of the control riser. [Plans Sht C4.07; Pg 21 of 53]
Correction 434:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-Per prior comment, per calcs there is 5.87ft of storage which places the riser crest at El. 74.27 (Bottom of Storage El. 68.40 + storage depth of 5.87).
[Plans Sht C4.07; Pg 21 of 53]
Correction 435:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-per calcs the orifice is located at 4.25ft (El. 72.65).
[Plans Sht C4.07; Pg 21 of 53]
Correction 436:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-Is it necessary to have such a large control riser and inlet/outlet pipes at SDCB10?
[Plans Sht C4.07; Pg 21 of 53]
Correction 437:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Please callout 6in sediment storage as provided on previous submittal.
[Plans Sht C4.10; Pg 24 of 53]
Correction 438:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-2yr WSE is greater than the 10yr WSE?
[Plans Sht C4.10; Pg 24 of 53]
Correction 439:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-24" pipe per C4.04.
[Plans Sht C4.30; Pg 31 of 53]
Correction 440:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-per prior comment min. 10ft of straight pipe on inlet side of GI (ref. City Stds 402.3(8).
[Plans Sht C5.01; Pg 34 of 53]
Correction 441:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-pipe IE
[Plans Sht C5.01; Pg 34 of 53]
Correction 442:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-reference callout... (4/C5.08)?
[Plans Sht C5.01; Pg 34 of 53]
Correction 443:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-pipe slope.
[Plans Sht C5.01; Pg 34 of 53]
Correction 444:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-per GI comment.
[Plans Sht C5.01; Pg 34 of 53]
Correction 445:
See Document Markup
Comments:
ADD-SSMH 1 to table.
[Plans Sht C5.01; Pg 34 of 53]
Correction 446:
See Document Markup
Comments:
ADD-to structure table.
[Plans Sht C5.01; Pg 34 of 53]
Correction 447:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-reference callout... (4/C5.08)?
[Plans Sht C5.01; Pg 34 of 53]
Correction 448:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Please callout "inside drop manhole".
[Plans Sht C5.01; Pg 34 of 53]
Correction 449:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Pipe Run Info?
[Plans Sht C5.02; Pg 35 of 53]
Correction 450:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout?
[Plans Sht C5.02; Pg 35 of 53]
Correction 451:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify slope/invert.
[Plans Sht C5.02; Pg 35 of 53]
Correction 452:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Pipe Run Info?
[Plans Sht C5.02; Pg 35 of 53]
Correction 453:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Pipe Run Info?
[Plans Sht C5.04; Pg 37 of 53]
Correction 454:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-Ethafoam crossing per 3/C6.05.
[Plans Sht C5.05; Pg 38 of 53]
Correction 455:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-Ethafoam crossing per 3/C6.05.
[Plans Sht C5.06; Pg 39 of 53]
Correction 456:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Due to long term maintenance concerns associated with the stream corridor, the City desires the watermain to cross over the stream above the high water elevation. Restrained joints (field lok gaskets, megalug, tie rods, etc) and insulating wrap required. Provide elevation detail of the watermain crossing.
[Plans Sht C6.01; Pg 42 of 53]
Correction 457:
See Document Markup
Comments:
ADD-"to be recorded".
[Plans Sht C6.01; Pg 42 of 53]
Correction 458:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-Fire hydrant.
[Plans Sht C6.01; Pg 42 of 53]
Correction 459:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-1.5in RPBA for 1.5in meter.
[Plans Sht C6.01; Pg 42 of 53]
Correction 460:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-pipe run.
[Plans Sht C6.02; Pg 43 of 53]
Correction 461:
See Document Markup
Comments:
ADD-"to be recorded".
[Plans Sht C6.02; Pg 43 of 53]
Correction 462:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-pipe run.
[Plans Sht C6.02; Pg 43 of 53]
Correction 463:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Fitting callout.
[Plans Sht C6.02; Pg 43 of 53]
Correction 464:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show gate valve.
[Plans Sht C6.04; Pg 45 of 53]
Correction 465:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-bend info.
[Plans Sht C6.05; Pg 46 of 53]
Correction 466:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-tee to DDCVA?
[Plans Sht C6.05; Pg 46 of 53]
Correction 467:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-callout.
[Plans Sht C6.05; Pg 46 of 53]
Correction 468:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-callout.
[Plans Sht C6.05; Pg 46 of 53]
Correction 469:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Pipe run callout.
[Plans Sht C6.05; Pg 46 of 53]
Correction 470:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-pipe run with plan.
[Plans Sht C6.06; Pg 47 of 53]
Correction 471:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-Ethafoam crossing per 3/C6.05.
[Plans Sht C6.07; Pg 48 of 53]
Correction 472:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-pipe run with plan.
[Plans Sht C6.07; Pg 48 of 53]
Correction 473:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-Ethafoam crossing per 3/C6.05.
[Plans Sht C6.07; Pg 48 of 53]
Correction 474:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-Ethafoam crossing per 3/C6.05.
[Plans Sht C6.08; Pg 49 of 53]
Correction 475:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-Wet tap per Sht C6.01.
[Plans Sht C6.08; Pg 49 of 53]
Correction 476:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-Profile 1/Sta 14+06 is located at approx. Station 61+30 on this profile.
[Plans Sht C6.08; Pg 49 of 53]
Correction 477:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-Ethafoam crossing per 3/C6.05.
[Plans Sht C6.08; Pg 49 of 53]
Correction 478:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Readability.
[Plans Sht C6.08; Pg 49 of 53]
Public Works Streets Review
Failed
03/22/2024
03/22/2024
Reviewer:
Corrections:
Correction 1:
Comment
Comments:
echo Traffic comments...
Engineering Traffic Review
Failed
03/22/2024
03/20/2024
Reviewer:
Corrections:
Correction 1:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
Per previous comment, include complete signal design with upcoming (separate) civil submittal for frontage improvements along Shaw Rd and E Pioneer. The City's review of proposed signal improvements will occur when complete frontage design is submitted with phase 2 (do not include signal improvements with current phase 1 submittal). Preliminary signal design submitted with phase 1 has not been reviewed. Please reference conditions for design requirements.
Correction 2:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Include note that specifically restricts construction access from Shaw Rd.
[Plans C1.1; Pg 3 of 63]
Correction 3:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Signal work will be completed under phase 2. No access via Shaw Rd for phase 1. Provide note on plans. See conditions for more details.
[Plans C2.1; Pg 4 of 63]
Correction 4:
See Document Markup
Comments:
The City's review of proposed signal improvements will occur when complete frontage design is submitted with phase 2 (do not include signal improvements with current phase 1 submittal)
[PM-01]
Correction 5:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Occupancy (for all buildings) will not be allowed until phase 2 frontage improvements are completed. There will be no phase 1 occupants. Please update note [Civil 0.0]
Correction 6:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Ramp/truncated dome design do not meet current ADA standards. Please make sure this is addressed in upcoming phase 2 civil design submittal.
[CIVIL - C3.01]
Correction 7:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Ramp/truncated dome design do not meet current ADA standards Please make sure this is addressed in upcoming phase 2 civil design submittal.
[CIVIL - C3.02]
Correction 8:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Please clarify on plans that frontage improvements shown on phase 1 have not been reviewed or approved by the City. Frontage improvements will be provided under separate phase 2 permit (roadway widening, city standard streetlighting, striping, signalization, signage, curb/gutter/sidewalk, reduced speed school zone, etc.)
[CIVIL - C3.01]
Public Works Collection Review
Approved
03/22/2024
03/19/2024
Reviewer:
Fire Review
Failed
03/22/2024
03/19/2024
Reviewer:
Corrections:
Correction 1:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
1. The water plans are different then what was originally drawn on preliminary site plan. Apply previous notes to Civils. Email on 2/7/23 from Phil Becker acknowledging these requirements and provided a site plan with new layout.
2. Do not block Fire Hydrants, or F.D.C's with parking stalls. Move all blocked Fire Hydrants, and F.D.C's into parking islands.
3. All F.D.C's are required to be within 10-15' of a Fire Hydrant.
4. Provide fire turn-around dimensions and radiuses.
5. Provide all fire lane widths and radiuses. All fire lanes are required to be 26' wide.
6. Provide auto-turn analysis.
7. Provide Riser Room locations with direct access to side walk.
8. Provide Fire Lane / No Parking Sign layout with painted curbs. Temporary Fire Truck turn-around will require No Parking Signs and painted curb.
Correction 2:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
1. Provide all fire lane widths and radiuses. All fire lanes are required to be 26' wide. Temporary access on Pioneer will be required to be a 26' width. Future BLD E does not have a width called out. BLD T.I. requires a 26' fire lane in front. Building G, and H do not have a fire lane width call out on the North side.
2. Confirm that all storm vaults in the fire lanes are rated for 75,000lb load minimum load limit per the 2018 IFC.
3. Place all F.D.C's and Fire Hydrants closer to fire lanes in all parking islands. Fire Hydrants are placed to close to the parking stall and require a 36" clear space around them. F.D.C's, Fire Hydrants, and P.I.V's should be set back a minimum of 3' behind all curbs to avoid vehicle impact. If this can not be accomplished, vehicle impact protection "bollards" will be required.
4. Provide temporary fire truck turn-around dimensions per the 2018 IFC.
5. Provide Riser Room locations with direct access to side walk.
6. I do not see this addressed? This is required to have its own sheet, with the size of this project all curbs that are not parking stalls will be required to be painted yellow with white stenciled NO PARKING FIRE LANE. FIRE LANE / NO PARKING signs are required to be set behind curb at 50' intervals. (PMC 16.04.015 Emergency vehicle parking) Provide Fire Lane / No Parking Sign layout with painted curbs. Temporary Fire Truck turn-around will require No Parking Signs and painted curb. Remove all other non fire related items off the page.
Correction 3:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
1. Fire lane plan needs to have the following areas stenciled and painted. See page C2.5 markups.
2. Municipal Code 16.04.015 Emergency vehicle parking. Lanes shall be identified by a 4 inch wide line and block letters 2 feet high, painted in the lane, at 50 foot or such other intervals which the Fire code official determines to be reasonable, stating “Emergency Vehicles Only,” color to be determined by the Fire code official (bright yellow), and by posting of signs stating “Emergency Vehicles Only - No Parking - Violator Vehicles Subject to Impound.” Signs shall be posted on or immediately next to the curb line, or on the building. Signs shall be 12" x 18" and shall have letters and background of contrasting colors, readily readable from at least a 50 foot distance. Signs shall be posted at a minimum no further than 50 feet apart, unless a greater distance is deemed reasonable by the Fire code official, nor shall they be more than 4 feet from the ground unless a greater height is determined necessary by the Fire code official.
3. Confirm that all storm vaults in the fire lanes are rated for 75,000lb load minimum load limit per the 2018 IFC.
4. Confirm placement of FDC's and Fire Hydrants have a 36" clear space around them. F.D.C's, Fire Hydrants, and P.I.V's should be set back a minimum of 3' behind all curbs to avoid vehicle impact. If this can not be accomplished, vehicle impact protection "bollards" will be required.
5. Riser Room locations have not been found. Show all Riser rooms on the fire lane stripping plan along with Fire Hydrant's and FDC's.
Public Works Water Review
Failed
03/22/2024
03/19/2024
Reviewer:
Corrections:
Correction 1:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil C-14: For pages C-14, C-15, C-16, C-17: Make corrections to all Development Engineering comments on these pages.
Correction 2:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil C-14: For pages C-14, C-15, C-16, C-17: Many of the proposed fire hydrant runs are located off dead-end 8-inch water mains, which reduces the available fire flow. Pay to have a hydraulic model of the proposed water layout, to see if the available fire flow will meet the building requirements.
Correction 3:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil C-14: For pages C-14, C-15: The existing 8-inch water main that runs through this project also supplies water to the property to the south, which requires the water main to be public. Since this existing water main will be running through proposed parking areas, the City will allow a one-time exception from our 40-foot utility easement requirement, and allow the water main to be placed in the middle of a 20-foot easement.
Correction 4:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil C-14: For pages C-14, C-15, C-16, C-17: All water infrastructure for this project outside the proposed public utility easement shall be private, and the property owners responsibility to repair and maintain. This includes all parts of each water service (i.e. connection taps, service line, meter setters, meter boxes, etc.), the only exception would be the water meters and radio transmission equipment (MXU) which would be owned by the City, but paid for and installed by the contractor.
Correction 5:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil C-14: For pages C-14, C-15, C-16, C-17: If the buildings are housing just apartments, a DCVA will be sufficient back flow protection. If the buildings contain both commercial space and apartments, upgrade the protection to an above ground RPBA.
Correction 6:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Landscape L1.0: No tree within 10-feet of water mains, hydrants, FDC's, PIV's, meters, and back flow protection. Provide 3-foot planting clear zone around hydrants, FDC's, PIV's, meters, and back flow protection.
Correction 7:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Landscape L1.0: No irrigation plan is shown. Show irrigation service, size of meter, protected by same size DCVA on Landscape and Civil plans.
Correction 8:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.01: The existing 8-inch water main through this project will be public and all other water lines will be private. Show and call out the public water easement on this plan set.
Correction 9:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.01: This tee will be an 8-inch by 8-inch wet tap with a stainless steel tapping sleeve and an 8-inch gate valve. Not 8-inch by 6-inch as called out.
Correction 10:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.01: Call out PIV.
Correction 11:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.01: Follow City standards. Call out 2-inch PE with 2-inch gate valves shown on plan set.
Correction 12:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.01: 1.5-inch meter requires 1.5-inch RPBA not 1-inch.
Correction 13:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.01: 1-inch PE for 1-inch water service.
Correction 14:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.01: The hydrant tee should be called out as 8-inch by 8-inch by 6-inch Fl tee. An 8-inch Fl by MJ adapter to the east. An 8-inch by 6-inch Fl reducer to the west. A 6-inch gate valve Fl by MJ west of reducer. Call out PIV by fire vault.
Correction 15:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.01: Fire flow will be reduced by not looping in the dead-end 8-inch water main runs.
Correction 16:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.02: The existing 8-inch water main through this project will be public and all other water lines will be private. Show and call out the public water easement for this plan set.
Correction 17:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.02: No line valves are called out on the public water main through this project. If any work needs to be done on this public main, all water to this complex will be off until work is completed. At a minimum, consider installing three 8-inch gate valves at this tee for better control. One 8-inch gate valve is required on the east side of this tee.
Correction 18:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.02: Call out and show a 6-inch gate valve at this tee.
Correction 19:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.02: Call out PIV.
Correction 20:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.02: Install an 8-inch by 6-inch reducer on south side of tee, with a 6-inch gate valve.
Correction 21:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.02: Call out and show an 8-inch gate valve at south side of tee.
Correction 22:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.02: Call out PIV.
Correction 23:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.02: Call out and show 2-inch gate valve at water main tap.
Correction 24:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.02: No backflow protection is shown for this water service.
Correction 25:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.02: Call out 2-inch PE, not 3-inch PE.
Correction 26:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.02: Call out 8-inch stainless steel tapping sleeve with gate valve. Show valve.
Correction 27:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.02: Call out and show 2-inch gate valve at water main tap. Call out 2-inch PE not 3-inch PE. No backflow protection is shown for this water service.
Correction 28:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.02: Call out PIV.
Correction 29:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.02: Call out and show 6-inch gate valve at tee.
Correction 30:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.02: Call out and show 6-inch gate valve at tee.
Correction 31:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.02: Call out PIV.
Correction 32:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.02: Call out and show 2-inch gate valve at water main tap. Call out 2-inch PE not 3-inch PE. No backflow protection is shown for this water service.
Correction 33:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.02: Fire flow will be reduced by not looping in the dead-end 8-inch water main run. If the water main is not looped, install an 8-inch MJ plug on the west side of the hydrant tee with a thrust block. No 8-inch gate valve needed.
Correction 34:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.02: Fire flow will be reduced by not looping in the dead-end 8-inch water main run. If the water main is not looped, install an 8-inch MJ plug on the west side of the hydrant tee with a thrust block. No 8-inch gate valve needed. Show the 6-inch gate valve for the hydrant. A fire hydrant run should be 20-feet or less in length. Move hydrant back in parking bump-out.
Correction 35:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.02: Show 8-inch gate valve at tee.
Correction 36:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.03: Call out and show 2-inch gate valve at water main tap. Call out 2-inch PE not 3-inch PE. No backflow protection is shown for this water service.
Correction 37:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.03: Call out and show 2-inch gate valve at water main tap. Call out 2-inch PE not 3-inch PE. No backflow protection is shown for this water service.
Correction 38:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.03: Do not install 8-inch gate valve until the phase 2 tie-in. Install a 2-inch blow-off assembly per City Standard detail 03.06.01.
Correction 39:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.04: Call out and show 2-inch gate valves at water main taps. Call out 2-inch PE not 3-inch PE. No backflow protection is shown for these water services.
Correction 40:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.04: When phase 2 is installed the 8-inch water main will be looped for better fire flow. Install an 8-inch by 6-inch fire hydrant tee west of the fire line tee to provide better future fire flow for the hydrant. The fire line tee can now be 8-inch by 6-inch with a 6-inch gate valve. The 8-inch gate valve to the east will be installed at the phase 2 tie-in. For now install an 8-inch MJ plug in the east end of the fire line tee with thrust blocking.
Correction 41:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.04: Call out PIV.
Correction 42:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.07: In a perfect world it would be great to keep our water main at 36-inches of cover. To eliminate trapped air high points, it would be best to run the relocated 8-inch water main under the 12-inch storm line at STA 51+00. Run the 8-inch relatively flat and transition with 45-degree bends to the low tie-in.
Correction 43:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.09: Move the standard detail to Sheet C6.08.
Correction 44:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.09: Remove this Standard detail and replace with 03.06.01 2-inch blow-off assembly.
Correction 45:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.10: Remove this unneeded Standard detail.
Correction 46:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.01: A water main running under a stream is problematic. The water main might have to be reconfigured to travel over the stream. This will require engineering to support, insulate, and restrain the pipe in this area.
Correction 47:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.01: Stainless steel tapping sleeves are only required on full size on size wet taps. Remove the stainless steel requirement on 6-inch wet taps.
Correction 48:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.01: Show the private water service lines into each building. If this is a 1.5-inch meter, a 1.5-inch RPBA would be the correct size.
Correction 49:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.02: There are two old water services on Shaw Road that need to be removed as part of this project. A water main shutdown will need to be scheduled with the Water Division, and the corporation stops will need to be removed off the water main and replaced with brass plugs.
Correction 50:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.02: Remove the 6 LF of 8-inch DIP and install 8-inch MJ plug in west side of hydrant tee.
Correction 51:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.02: Remove the 5 LF of 8-inch DIP and install 8-inch MJ plug in west side of hydrant tee.
Correction 52:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.04: Recommend that the fire hydrant run is off a separate tee just west of the fire line tee. Install a gate valve on the north side of the tee for the solo fire line run. Remove the 8-inch gate valve east of the fire line tee, until the phase 2 tie-in. If you keep the present configuration, install an 8-inch by 8-inch tee with gate valve to north, 8-inch DIP to hydrant tee, then reducer to 6-inch fire line run.
Planning Review
Failed
03/22/2024
03/04/2024
Reviewer:
Corrections:
Correction 1:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Site frontage must contain type II, 12 feet of layered shrubs and ground cover in a berm. Grass cannot be located in first 12 feet of landscape yard. See VMS type IIc standard. [landscape comment, sheet L1.1]
Correction 2:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add additional street tree here along frontage of bldg H. [landscape comment, sheet L1.1]
Correction 3:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add additional row of street trees here. This landscape yard must be 12 feet, see civil plan comments. [landscape comment, sheet L1.1]
Correction 4:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add additional row of street trees interior to the walk way along drive asile. This walk way must be interior of a landscape strip, also see civil plan comments. [landscape comment, sheet L1.1]
Correction 5:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Planning commented on location of utilities and conflict with parking lot landscape islands on full civil plan set. Landscape architect to coordinate with civil design to show all water, sanitary, storm and other underground utilities on each quadrant plan set sheet, ensuring proper separation is provided [landscape comment, sheet L1.0]
Correction 6:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Any area in a stream buffer must be restore/re-vegetated with native plants only. [landscape comment, sheet L1.3]
Correction 7:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show city standard sight distance triangle area on both sides of drive way [landscape comment, sheet L1.4]
Correction 8:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Move walk way interior to drive aisle, move landscape to edge of curb line, add trees. Must use a medium sized tree for area, such as a european hornbeam, zelkova, Frontier elm, gingko, or similar species here [landscape comment, sheet L1.4]
Correction 9:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Planter strip must be 6 feet wide, contain trees. See type IV design standards, VMS. Same comment on civil design plan [landscape comment, sheet L1.4]
Correction 10:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Some islands not correctly sized (8 feet required width). See type IV design standards, VMS. Same comment on civil design plan [landscape comment, sheet L1.4]
Correction 11:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Acer rubrum on prohibited street tree list, pick another large canopy tree from approved list in VMS. Also provide intermix of species consistent with VMS section 12.6 [landscape comment, sheet L1.4]
Correction 12:
See Document Markup
Comments:
This plaza space shall include amenities such as bike parking, bench seating, planters, fountains, artwork, decorative railing, decorative light fixtures, hanging baskets or other features that are pedestrian scaled in nature on street frontages, per code. Please show pedestrian scale improvements on plan sheets. [landscape comment, sheet L1.4]
Correction 13:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide low growing native shrubs and daffodils in these cut outs along curb line [landscape comment, sheet L1.4]
Correction 14:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Space street trees on frontage of site (immediately back of walk) at 25-30 feet on center. Appear to be 40 feet or more as shown. [landscape comment, sheet L1.4]
Correction 15:
See Document Markup
Comments:
All landscaping islands and connector strips shall be designed using either
evergreen and deciduous shrub masses spacing at tight on-center intervals (designed to provide 90 percent coverage in 3 years) that will prevent foot traffic and associated soil compaction into these landscaping areas. Appears to need additional plants to provide coverage requirements. [landscape comment, sheet L1.4]
Correction 16:
See Document Markup
Comments:
The following comment applies throughout the plan set, where applicable. Please show a cross hatch for site frontages and grouped throughout the site landscape plan set. Section 7.4 from the VMS: ??? ????????? ??? ???????? ???? ??? ? ???? ??????? ???? ???????? ???? ???????????? ???????????? ?? ??????? ???? ???????? ????????? ????????? ????? ?? ???? ?? ??? ????????? ???? ?????? ??? ????????? ????????? ???? ????? ???????? ?? ??? ? ??? ????? ??????? ????????? ??????? ????? ??????? ?? ?????? ??????? ?? ??? ????? ?? ?? ????????? ????? ?????? ??? ???????? ????? ??????? ?? ?? ?????????? ????? ????????? ?? ????????? ????? ?? ???? ?? ????????? ??????? ????????? ??????
A. Daffodil Bulbs may be interspersed throughout the perimeter landscape areas with standard landscaping shrubs/ground cover/trees, as required. ?? ????? ????????? ?? ????????? ??????? ??? ?? ????? ???? ??? ?????????? ?? ????? ??????? ??†?????? ??????? ?? ??? ???????? ????? ??????? ?? ??? ???????? ???? ??? ?????????? ???? ??? ????? ?? ???? ?? ???????? ???? ???????? ????? ?? ????????? ?? ??????????? ???? ?? ???? ?? ????? ????????????? ?????????? ? ?????????? ?????????? ??? ?? ???????? ?? ???? ?? ?????????? ?? ?????? ??? ???????????? ?? ??? ??????????? ???? ?? ????? ??????? ????????? ????????? ??? ???? ?? ??????????? ???? ?? ???? ?? ?????? ???? ?? ?????? ??? ?????? ?? ???? ????? ????????
Correction 17:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide low growing native shrubs and daffodils in these cut outs along curb line [landscape comment, sheet L1.4]
Correction 18:
See Document Markup
Comments:
7.3 Native plant materials A minimum of 50 percent of the shrubs and ground covers used in projects under the requirements of the PMC and the VMS shall be native to the Puget Sound region. Drought tolerant non-PNW Native species, such as xeriscape plants, may be used as a substitute to native plant requirements to create landscapes adaptable to climate change and localized heat island
issues that may not allow PNW native species to successfully establish. PNW native species shall
be used in all cases as a first priority; the project landscape architect must detail why xeriscape
species of plants would be used as a supplement or substitute. [landscape comment, sheet L1.5]
Correction 19:
Miscellaneous Planning Correction
Comments:
CRITICAL AREAS: Is the November 30, 2022 stream corridor revegetation plan (drawn by 'Nature by Design', KOwens) the current plan set for the mitigation plan? Please include those plan sheets with the landscape sheets. Will the mitigation plan be updated as a result of the USACE review and approval process?
UPDATED 03/04/24: No response to this comment located. No stream re-veg plan in landscape resubmittal located. Outstanding comment.
Correction 20:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
SEPA CONDITIONS: SEPA mitigation measures require implementation of a requirement for off-site safe routes to schools improvements. See P-21-0034 SEPA (June 27, 2023). Please provide those plans for further review and agency consultation.
UPDATED 03/04/24: No response to this comment located. Assumed this will be a separate off-site civil permit submittal.
Correction 21:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
LANDSCAPE 03/04/24: Daffodils are required throughout site design frontages, consistent with VMS section 7.3. All perimeter landscape yard areas required by PMC 20.58 shall include Narcissus trumpet 'King Alfred' or ‘Dutch Master’ in the first 3’ of landscape areas behind the property line, planted at 6” on-center. Not located on the landscape plan sheets.
LANDSCAPE 03/04/24: Provide bench seating and other pedestrian features on the landscape plan sheets in the street corner plaza. This is required by PMC 20.30.037, and was previously noted. Providing bench seating and ped scale lighting will meet the min. requirements.
LANDSCAPE 04/30/24: Items from March 04 review still outstanding, not located on plan sheets or in comment response.
Engineering Civil Review
Failed
01/02/2024
01/28/2024
Reviewer:
Corrections:
Correction 1:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Called out twice.
[Storm Report; Pg 1 of 164]
Correction 2:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Revise page numbering to align with the report sections.
[Storm Report; Pg 4 of 164]
Correction 3:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Parcel ...054.
Storm Report; Pg 5 of 164]
Correction 4:
See Document Markup
Comments:
The storm report should be written to reflect the overall 'common plan of development' to ensure adequate storm facilities and site discharge compliance... that includes both Phase 1 and Phase 2. Revise accordingly.
[Storm Report; Pg 5 of 164]
Correction 5:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Revise table to account for the overall 'common plan of development' (both Phase 1 and Phase 2).
[Storm Report; Pg 5 of 164]
Correction 6:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Breakout surface areas by phase and basin. (See basin exhibit comments, Fig. 5).
[Storm Report; Pg 5 of 164]
Correction 7:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Breakout Shaw Rd and Pioneer frontages separately.
[Storm Report; Pg 5 of 164]
Correction 8:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add commentary that the existing storm pond is located in the SE corner of the site and will be converted to an underground facility as part of this project.
[Storm Report; Pg 6 of 164]
Correction 9:
See Document Markup
Comments:
For the STORM REPORT ONLY, provide both the Phase 1 and Phase 2 grading and drainage plans in Appendix A. Identify the phase boundary on the plans.
[Storm Report; Pg 8 of 164]
Correction 10:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use 10yr developed inflow flow rate due to discharge to a regulated stream (Pioneer Ditch). If the TESC pond discharge location is into a pipe at the intersection, it is acceptable to use the 2yr developed inflow flow rate.
[Storm Report; Pg 8 of 164]
Correction 11:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add Interceptor Swales, Check Dams, and TESC pond (per CSWPPP).
[Storm Report; Pg 8 of 164]
Correction 12:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coordinate the 13 elements with the review comments on the CSWPPP.
[Storm Report; Pg 8 of 164]
Correction 13:
See Document Markup
Comments:
As mentioned previously, provide the LID Performance/Duration Curves to ensure compliance.
[Storm Report; Pg 11 of 164]
Correction 14:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add: "2yr" .
[Storm Report; Pg 11 of 164]
Correction 15:
See Document Markup
Comments:
pipe.
[Storm Report; Pg 11 of 164]
Correction 16:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-24in called out on civil plans.
[Storm Report; Pg 11 of 164]
Correction 17:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Revise-"stream/ditch".
[Storm Report; Pg 11 of 164]
Correction 18:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add: "mitigated".
[Storm Report; Pg 12 of 164]
Correction 19:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Clarify-Does this include the Phase 2 PGHS?. Phase 2 needs to be addressed as part of the 'Common Plan of Development'.
[Storm Report; Pg 12 of 164]
Correction 20:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Discuss Shaw Road frontage and Pioneer Way frontage WQ aspects.
[Storm Report; Pg 12 of 164]
Correction 21:
See Document Markup
Comments:
NOTE: Shaw Road approach exceeds 5000sf of bypass PGHS and must be treated prior to discharge to the public conveyance system.
[Storm Report; Pg 12 of 164]
Correction 22:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add: "emergency vehicle".
[Storm Report; Pg 12 of 164]
Correction 23:
See Document Markup
Comments:
The landuse application analyzed the site as one basin with one point-of-compliance (POC) which was acceptable for preliminary design. However, the commercial area and the multi-family area, including Phase 2 improvements, are separate sub-basins with one POC. Provide WWHM calculations which reflect the specific surface area types of each subbasin and the specific vault and control structure sizing for each subbasin.
[Storm Report; Pg 12 of 164]
Correction 24:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Discuss Shaw Road frontage and Pioneer Way frontage flow control aspects.
[Storm Report; Pg 12 of 164]
Correction 25:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Include Phase 2 improvements in the flow control design to ensure stormwater facilities are properly sized ('Common Plan of Development' rule).
[Storm Report; Pg 12 of 164]
Correction 26:
See Document Markup
Comments:
"The"?
Correction 27:
See Document Markup
Comments:
MR9 should reflect O&M requirements for the entire stormwater system onsite...suggested language "An operation and maintenance manual that is consistent with the provisions of PMC 21.10 and City Standards shall be provided for the proposed stormwater facilities and BMPs, and the parties responsible for the operation and maintenance shall be identified."
[Storm Report; Pg 13 of 164]
Correction 28:
See Document Markup
Comments:
The geotech report actually states that permeable paving and other BMPs may be possible. Clarify that it is the project's intent to comply with the LID Performance Standard rather than the List option.
[Storm Report; Pg 13 of 164]
Correction 29:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Revise-"stream/ditch".
[Storm Report; Pg 14 of 164]
Correction 30:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Suggest-"Offsite the pollution generating surface of Shaw Road frontage is not being expanded and the sidewalks will be permeable pavement."
[Storm Report; Pg 14 of 164]
Correction 31:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Revise-How is Pioneer Frontage going to be treated for water quality? (Over-detaining is not treatment methodolgy.)
[Storm Report; Pg 14 of 164]
Correction 32:
See Document Markup
Comments:
As previously mentioned, provide a backwater analysis of the Pioneer Avenue conveyance system as outlined in City Standards Section 204.3 considering the tailwater elevation (OHWM) of the Pioneer Avenue north ditch. The analysis shall include runoff from onsite (developed conditions) and offsite (existing conditions) basins tributary to the discharge location.
[Storm Report; Pg 15 of 164]
Correction 33:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Dedication of new ROW is required along Shaw Road and Pioneer frontages. Revise accordingly.
[Storm Report; Pg 15 of 164].
Correction 34:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add: "A Stormwater Maintenance Agreement will be recorded at the time of Occupancy in accordance with City Standards."
[Storm Report; Pg 15 of 164]
Correction 35:
See Document Markup
Comments:
The applicant will be required to post a financial guarantee in accordance with PMC 21.10.160.
[Storm Report; Pg 16 of 164].
Correction 36:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coordinate this sheet with the review comments associated with the CFG application.
[Storm Report; Pg 23 of 164].
Correction 37:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coordinate these sheets with the review comments associated with the CFG application.
[Storm Report; Pg 24 of 164].
Correction 38:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coordinate storm sheets with the review comments associated with the civil plans.
[Storm Report; Pg 29 of 164].
Correction 39:
See Document Markup
Comments:
The Basin Map should reflect the overall 'common plan of development' to ensure adequate storm facilities are constructed and site discharge compliance... that includes both Phase 1 and Phase 2. Revise accordingly.
[Storm Report; Pg 34 of 164]
Correction 40:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide a surface area breakdown by phase and basin name. For example, PH1 MF Roof area = ______sf (ac). Provide a total for each basin breakdown. Also, include the frontage bypass basins.
[Storm Report; Pg 34 of 164]
Correction 41:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Identify the Pioneer Frontage Basin.
[Storm Report; Pg 34 of 164]
Correction 42:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Identify the Shaw Rd Frontage Basin.
[Storm Report; Pg 34 of 164]
Correction 43:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Identify the Phase I and Phase II basins.
[Storm Report; Pg 34 of 164]
Correction 44:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Clarify-The civil plans appear to show this area being bypassed.
[Storm Report; Pg 34 of 164]
Correction 45:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per prior comment, include the groundwater monitoring results associated with Monitoring Wells #1 and #2 in the geotechnical section.
[Storm Report; Pg 35 of 164]
Correction 46:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide the referenced Table 1 for completeness.
[Storm Report; Pg 88 of 164].
Correction 47:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Prior to Occupancy, submit a DRAFT version of the City's Stormwater Management Facilities Agreement with an O&M manual using the maintenance activities described in the City's Stormwater Site Management Plan. The agreement shall be recorded with the Pierce County Auditors Office.
[Storm Report; Pg 95 of 164]
Correction 48:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide R-Tank O&M information.
[Storm Report; Pg 95 of 164]
Correction 49:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Sizing calculations for the existing storm facility serving the properties south of the project has been deferred to Phase 2. It is the applicant's responsibility to ensure the replacement facility complies with the original design constraints and does not conflict with the proposed improvements.
[Storm Report; Pg 111 of 164]
Correction 50:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Does not agree with Table 1. Also, the pre-developed condition should include the disturbed areas for both Phase 1 and Phase 2 (common plan of development), and the frontage bypass basins.
[Storm Report; Pg 113 of 164]
Correction 51:
See Document Markup
Comments:
The developed area should be broken into the individual subbasins (commercial and multi-family (including the Phase 2 improvements)) to reflect each basin's surface area types and verify the specific vault and control structure sizing of each.
[Storm Report; Pg 114 of 164]
Correction 52:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Does not agree with Table 1.
Storm Report; Pg 114 of 164]
Correction 53:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Include both the Shaw Road and Pioneer Way frontages in the bypass basin(s) (common plan of development).
[Storm Report; Pg 115 of 164]
Correction 54:
See Document Markup
Comments:
See comments on Mitigated Basin Data sheet, Pg 114 of 164. Revise accordingly.
[Storm Report; Pg 117 of 164]
Correction 55:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil plans callout a riser height of 1.23ft for RT1. Revise calculations to reflect the actual control risers being used for each subasin.
[Storm Report; Pg 117 of 164]
Correction 56:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil plans callout RT1 height of 3.35ft and available storage depth of 4.1ft (4.6ft of storage minus 6in of sediment storage = 4.1ft). Revise calculations to reflect the actual vaults (RTanks) being used for each subasin.
[Storm Report; Pg 117 of 164]
Correction 57:
See Document Markup
Comments:
For the multi-family basin, provide calculations of available storage associated with the detention pipe.
[Storm Report; Pg 117 of 164]
Correction 58:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Ensure that the detention facilities have accounted for 6in of sediment storage per Ecology's requirements.
[Storm Report; Pg 117 of 164]
Correction 59:
See Document Markup
Comments:
As mentioned previously, in addition to the Stream Duration curves above, provide the LID Duration curves to ensure compliance with the LID Performance Standard.
[Storm Report; Pg 119 of 164]
Correction 60:
See Document Markup
Comments:
As mentioned previously, this output does not agree with the LID Duration curves. Provide the LID Duration curves to ensure compliance with the LID Performance Standard.
[Storm Report; Pg 129 of 164]
Correction 61:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Depending on the outcome of the LID analysis (duration curves indicate "fail"), the project will have to increase the detention facilities to meet the LID Performance Standard or choose the MR5 List option.
[Storm Report; Pg 129 of 164]
Correction 62:
See Document Markup
Comments:
See comments on Predeveloped Basin Data sheet, Pg 113 of 164.
[Storm Report; Pg 131 of 164]
Correction 63:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Break the onsite basin into the individual subasins (commercial and multi-family) to ensure the vaults and control structures are correctly sized for each. The WWHM modeling should reflect both Phase 1 and Phase 2 improvements (common plan of development).
[Storm Report; Pg 132 of 164]
Correction 64:
See Document Markup
Comments:
RM-20.
[Plans C-1; Pg 1 of 45]
Correction 65:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Locate address below Vicinity Map and add an abbreviated legal description below the title (1/4-section, Sec., Twp., Rng.)
[Plans C-1; Pg 1 of 45]
Correction 66:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide frontage improvement plans for Phase 1. (Per conversation w/ JMcInnis 07/19/23 frontage improvements will be a separate civil application). [Plans C-1; Pg 1 of 45]
Correction 67:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add: Phase 1 to title.
[Plans C-1; Pg 1 of 45]
Correction 68:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Locate Vicinity Map in lower right-hand corner per CS Section 2.1.
[Plans C-1; Pg 1 of 45]
Correction 69:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Locate approval block in upper right-hand corner, all sheets, per CS Section 2.1.
[Plans C-1; Pg 1 of 45]
Correction 70:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Place North arrow correctly.
[Plans C-1; Pg 1 of 45]
Correction 71:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Augment the Construction Sequence-See example.
[Plans C-1; Pg 1 of 45]
Correction 72:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout earthwork quantities (cut/fill).
[Plans C-1; Pg 1 of 45]
Correction 73:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout the following information on all plan sheets:
Shaw Road // Pioneer Way // Show ROW lines and distance from centerline.
[Plans C-1; Pg 1 of 45]
Correction 74:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout the trash enclosure locations and provide detail(s). Reference City Standards 208.1 for requirements.
[Plans C-1; Pg 1 of 45]
Correction 75:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per City Standards Section 1.8 provide a landscape plan with a utility overlay (water, sewer, storm) and ensure no trees are located within 10ft of utility equipment (meters, hydrants, CBs, etc).
[Plans C-1; Pg 1 of 45]
Correction 76:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coordinate this sheet with the review comments associated with the CFG application PRGR20230972.
[Plans C-2; Pg 2 of 45]
Correction 77:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Place North arrow correctly.
[Plans C-2; Pg 2 of 45]
Correction 78:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Locate approval block in upper right-hand corner.
[Plans C-2; Pg 2 of 45]
Correction 79:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-C4?
[Plans C-3; Pg 3 of 45]
Correction 80:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-C5?
[Plans C-3; Pg 3 of 45]
Correction 81:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout stationing of approach centerline along Shaw Road.
[Plans C-3; Pg 3 of 45]
Correction 82:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout drive aisle width.
[Plans C-3; Pg 3 of 45]
Correction 83:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide detail.
[Plans C-3; Pg 3 of 45]
Correction 84:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add: "(Typical)".
[Plans C-3; Pg 3 of 45]
Correction 85:
See Document Markup
Comments:
How is this area being captured for detention? If bypassed, revise basin exhibit in the storm report.
[Plans C-3; Pg 3 of 45]
Correction 86:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide auto-turn analysis for the largest anticipated vehicle that would access the site to ensure adequate radii an dimensioning. Coordinate with Shaw Road frontage plans.
[Plans C-3; Pg 3 of 45]
Correction 87:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-The rim is called out to be approx. 7ft below TC?
[Plans C-3; Pg 3 of 45]
Correction 88:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show High Point Break Line.
[Plans C-3; Pg 3 of 45]
Correction 89:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coordinate with Sht C7.
[Plans C-3; Pg 3 of 45]
Correction 90:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coordinate pipe alignment with Sht C7.
[Plans C-3; Pg 3 of 45]
Correction 91:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coordinate structure reqt's with Sht C7.
[Plans C-3; Pg 3 of 45]
Correction 92:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-SDCB?
[Plans C-3; Pg 3 of 45]
Correction 93:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-SDCB?
[Plans C-3; Pg 3 of 45]
Correction 94:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-SDCB?
[Plans C-3; Pg 3 of 45]
Correction 95:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-is one curb inlet adequate for the tributary area?
[Plans C-3; Pg 3 of 45]
Correction 96:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide spot elevations at corners of raised crosswalk.
[Plans C-3; Pg 3 of 45]
Correction 97:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-SDCB?
[Plans C-3; Pg 3 of 45]
Correction 98:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-SDCB?
[Plans C-3; Pg 3 of 45]
Correction 99:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-SDCB?
[Plans C-3; Pg 3 of 45]
Correction 100:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coord IE with Sht C7.
[Plans C-3; Pg 3 of 45]
Correction 101:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-SDCB?
[Plans C-3; Pg 3 of 45]
Correction 102:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coord IE with Sht C7.
[Plans C-3; Pg 3 of 45]
Correction 103:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout radii of internal drive aisles and aisle widths. Or, show on a "dimensioning plan" sheet.
[Plans C-3; Pg 3 of 45]
Correction 104:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide ductile iron pipe for any storm conveyance with less than 3ft of cover.
[Plans C-3; Pg 3 of 45]
Correction 105:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Also identify existing contours as well the proposed contours.
[Plans C-3; Pg 3 of 45]
Correction 106:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Delineate the regulated floodplain on the plan.
[Plans C-3; Pg 3 of 45]
Correction 107:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout radii of internal drive aisles and aisle widths. Or, show on a "dimensioning plan" sheet.
[Plans C-4; Pg 4 of 45]
Correction 108:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide ductile iron pipe for any storm conveyance with less than 3ft of cover.
[Plans C-4; Pg 4 of 45]
Correction 109:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Also identify existing contours as well the proposed contours.
[Plans C-4; Pg 4 of 45]
Correction 110:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Readability.
[Plans C-4; Pg 4 of 45]
Correction 111:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-C6?
[Plans C-4; Pg 4 of 45]
Correction 112:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coordinate with Sht C8.
[Plans C-4; Pg 4 of 45]
Correction 113:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-C3?
[Plans C-4; Pg 4 of 45]
Correction 114:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Clarify-curb inlets? Provide detail how this functions.
[Plans C-4; Pg 4 of 45]
Correction 115:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show High Point Break Line.
[Plans C-4; Pg 4 of 45]
Correction 116:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coordinate IE with Sht C8.
[Plans C-4; Pg 4 of 45]
Correction 117:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show High Point Break Line.
[Plans C-4; Pg 4 of 45]
Correction 118:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coordinate BC with CB Rim elev.
[Plans C-4; Pg 4 of 45]
Correction 119:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show High Point Break Line.
[Plans C-4; Pg 4 of 45]
Correction 120:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Readability.
[Plans C-4; Pg 4 of 45]
Correction 121:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Identify contour within paving area (Typ).
[Plans C-4; Pg 4 of 45]
Correction 122:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coordinate IE with Sht C8.
[Plans C-4; Pg 4 of 45]
Correction 123:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show High Point Break Line.
[Plans C-4; Pg 4 of 45]
Correction 124:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coordinate IE with Sht C8.
[Plans C-4; Pg 4 of 45]
Correction 125:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-C3?
[Plans C-5; Pg 5 of 45]
Correction 126:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout radii of internal drive aisles and aisle widths. Or, show on a "dimensioning plan" sheet.
[Plans C-5; Pg 5 of 45]
Correction 127:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide ductile iron pipe for any storm conveyance with less than 3ft of cover.
[Plans C-5; Pg 5 of 45]
Correction 128:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Also identify existing contours as well the proposed contours.
[Plans C-5; Pg 5 of 45]
Correction 129:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Delineate the regulated floodplain on the plan.
[Plans C-5; Pg 5 of 45]
Correction 130:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coordinate structure info with Sht C9.
[Plans C-5; Pg 5 of 45]
Correction 131:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coordinate structure info with Sht C9.
[Plans C-5; Pg 5 of 45]
Correction 132:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coordinate IE with Sht C9.
[Plans C-5; Pg 5 of 45]
Correction 133:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coordinate structure info with Sht C9.
[Plans C-5; Pg 5 of 45]
Correction 134:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coordinate structure info with Sht C9.
[Plans C-5; Pg 5 of 45]
Correction 135:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Identify contours w/in the drive aisle (Typ).
[Plans C-5; Pg 5 of 45]
Correction 136:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coordinate structure info with Sht C9.
[Plans C-5; Pg 5 of 45]
Correction 137:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-C6?
[Plans C-5; Pg 5 of 45]
Correction 138:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coordinate structure info with Sht C9.
[Plans C-5; Pg 5 of 45]
Correction 139:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coordinate structure info with Sht C9.
[Plans C-5; Pg 5 of 45]
Correction 140:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-C4?.
[Plans C-6; Pg 6 of 45]
Correction 141:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coordinate IE with Sht C10.
[Plans C-6; Pg 6 of 45]
Correction 142:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout radii of internal drive aisles and aisle widths. Or, show on a "dimensioning plan" sheet.
[Plans C-6; Pg 6 of 45]
Correction 143:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide ductile iron pipe for any storm conveyance with less than 3ft of cover.
[Plans C-6; Pg 6 of 45]
Correction 144:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coordinate structure info with Sht C8.
[Plans C-6; Pg 6 of 45]
Correction 145:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coordinate IE with Sht C8.
[Plans C-6; Pg 6 of 45]
Correction 146:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coordinate structure info with Sht C8.
[Plans C-6; Pg 6 of 45]
Correction 147:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coordinate IE with Sht C8.
[Plans C-6; Pg 6 of 45]
Correction 148:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Also identify existing contours as well the proposed contours.
[Plans C-6; Pg 6 of 45]
Correction 149:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-C5?.
[Plans C-6; Pg 6 of 45]
Correction 150:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coordinate IE with Sht C10.
[Plans C-6; Pg 6 of 45]
Correction 151:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coordinate structure info with Sht C10.
[Plans C-6; Pg 6 of 45]
Correction 152:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coordinate IE with Sht C10.
[Plans C-6; Pg 6 of 45]
Correction 153:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coordinate IE with Sht C10.
[Plans C-6; Pg 6 of 45]
Correction 154:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coordinate structure info with Sht C10.
[Plans C-6; Pg 6 of 45]
Correction 155:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-C8?
[Plans C-7; Pg 7 of 45]
Correction 156:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-4/C18?
[Plans C-7; Pg 7 of 45]
Correction 157:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout R-Tank IE.
[Plans C-7; Pg 7 of 45]
Correction 158:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-C9?
[Plans C-7; Pg 7 of 45]
Correction 159:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout diameter and lid type.
[Plans C-7; Pg 7 of 45]
Correction 160:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Confirm-Type 2 CB or manhole?
[Plans C-7; Pg 7 of 45]
Correction 161:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-1/C18?
[Plans C-7; Pg 7 of 45]
Correction 162:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per prior comment, storm pipe downstream of the control structure is a conveyance pipe subject to City Stds (size, slope, etc.). Conveyance pipes that do not meet standards must be approved by the City Engineer via the Alternative Methods Request (AMR) process.
[Plans C-7; Pg 7 of 45]
Correction 163:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout IE.
[Plans C-7; Pg 7 of 45]
Correction 164:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Top of CB is below detention water surface elevation. Also, Sht C3 indicates the rim is 7ft below top of curb. Revise accordingly.
[Plans C-7; Pg 7 of 45]
Correction 165:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Min. 1ft of cover on DI pipe.
[Plans C-7; Pg 7 of 45]
Correction 166:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Min. 1ft of cover on DI pipe.
[Plans C-7; Pg 7 of 45]
Correction 167:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-bottom of vault at 68.63, so 0% slope is not correct.
[Plans C-7; Pg 7 of 45]
Correction 168:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Changes in direction require CB.
[Plans C-7; Pg 7 of 45]
Correction 169:
See Document Markup
Comments:
SDMH...callout diameter and lid type.
[Plans C-7; Pg 7 of 45]
Correction 170:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide structure information.
[Plans C-7; Pg 7 of 45]
Correction 171:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout diameter and lid type.
[Plans C-7; Pg 7 of 45]
Correction 172:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Not acceptable to use the FC structure as a catch basin...single-use structure per City Standards.
[Plans C-7; Pg 7 of 45]
Correction 173:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Confirm-Type 2 CB or manhole?
[Plans C-7; Pg 7 of 45]
Correction 174:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify rim elevation...6ft riser + 05ft clear above top of riser results in an elevation of 74.5 to underside of the control structure.
[Plans C-7; Pg 7 of 45]
Correction 175:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-36in called out on Sht 29 of 45.
[Plans C-7; Pg 7 of 45]
Correction 176:
See Document Markup
Comments:
WWHM calculations callout a riser height of 6ft. Revise accordingly.
[Plans C-7; Pg 7 of 45]
Correction 177:
See Document Markup
Comments:
WWHM calculations callout a riser height of 6ft. Revise accordingly.
[Plans C-7; Pg 7 of 45]
Correction 178:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify rim elevation...6ft riser + 05ft clear above top of riser results in an elevation of 74.5 to underside of the control structure.
[Plans C-7; Pg 7 of 45]
Correction 179:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Outlet.
[Plans C-7; Pg 7 of 45]
Correction 180:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide structure information.
[Plans C-7; Pg 7 of 45]
Correction 181:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Clarify-to be provided with Phase 2?
[Plans C-7; Pg 7 of 45]
Correction 182:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Clarify-there is no existing MH at this location.
[Plans C-7; Pg 7 of 45]
Correction 183:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-based on ARG survey, this elevation is approx. 4ft below the storm conveyance system located at the intersection.
[Plans C-7; Pg 7 of 45]
Correction 184:
See Document Markup
Comments:
City Standards require 0.5% min pipe slope.
[Plans C-7; Pg 7 of 45]
Correction 185:
See Document Markup
Comments:
City Standards require 0.5% min pipe slope.
[Plans C-7; Pg 7 of 45]
Correction 186:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout 2ft min clearance to water line.
[Plans C-7; Pg 7 of 45]
Correction 187:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Readability.
[Plans C-7; Pg 7 of 45]
Correction 188:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Storm-Water conflict...revise accordingly.
[Plans C-7; Pg 7 of 45]
Correction 189:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide an "Overall" storm sheet showing the storm alignments.
[Plans C-7; Pg 7 of 45]
Correction 190:
See Document Markup
Comments:
NOTE: Shaw Road approach exceeds 5000sf of bypass PGHS and must be treated prior to discharge to the public conveyance system.
[Plans C-7; Pg 7 of 45]
Correction 191:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide ductile iron pipe for any storm conveyance with less than 3ft of cover.
[Plans C-7; Pg 7 of 45]
Correction 192:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show locations of the roof drain connection to the storm system.
[Plans C-7; Pg 7 of 45]
Correction 193:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide utility crossing information.
[Plans C-7; Pg 7 of 45]
Correction 194:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add Placeholder: "See Frontage Improvement Plans, Application ______".
[Plans C-7; Pg 7 of 45]
Correction 195:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Delineate the regulated floodplain on the plan.
[Plans C-7; Pg 7 of 45]
Correction 196:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide utility crossing information.
[Plans C-8; Pg 8 of 45]
Correction 197:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide ductile iron pipe for any storm conveyance with less than 3ft of cover.
[Plans C-8; Pg 8 of 45]
Correction 198:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show locations of the roof drain connection to the storm system.
[Plans C-8; Pg 8 of 45]
Correction 199:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add Placeholder: "See Frontage Improvement Plans, Application ______".
[Plans C-8; Pg 8 of 45]
Correction 200:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-C7?
[Plans C-8; Pg 8 of 45]
Correction 201:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide structure information.
[Plans C-8; Pg 8 of 45]
Correction 202:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout diameter and lid type.
[Plans C-8; Pg 8 of 45]
Correction 203:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Confirm-Type 2 CB or manhole?
[Plans C-8; Pg 8 of 45]
Correction 204:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-bottom of vault at 68.63, so 0% slope is not correct.
[Plans C-8; Pg 8 of 45]
Correction 205:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout R-Tank IE.
[Plans C-8; Pg 8 of 45]
Correction 206:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-36in called out on Sht 35 of 45.
[Plans C-8; Pg 8 of 45]
Correction 207:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-C10?
[Plans C-8; Pg 8 of 45]
Correction 208:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout diameter and lid type.
[Plans C-8; Pg 8 of 45]
Correction 209:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout diameter and lid type.
[Plans C-8; Pg 8 of 45]
Correction 210:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Confirm-Type 2 CB or manhole?
[Plans C-8; Pg 8 of 45]
Correction 211:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Confirm-Type 2 CB or manhole?
[Plans C-8; Pg 8 of 45]
Correction 212:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-This is 4ft lower than the discharge main.
[Plans C-8; Pg 8 of 45]
Correction 213:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-IE does not agree with pipe slope (0.84%).
[Plans C-8; Pg 8 of 45]
Correction 214:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-This is 4ft lower than the discharge main.
[Plans C-8; Pg 8 of 45]
Correction 215:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout diameter.
[Plans C-8; Pg 8 of 45]
Correction 216:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout diameter.
[Plans C-8; Pg 8 of 45]
Correction 217:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Ensure no ponding along adjacent properties as a result of fill. (Typical) (May need to provide a storm conveyance system to collect ponded water).
[Plans C-8; Pg 8 of 45]
Correction 218:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Ensure no ponding along adjacent properties as a result of fill. (Typical) (May need to provide a storm conveyance system to collect ponded water).
[Plans C-8; Pg 8 of 45]
Correction 219:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-C8?
[Plans C-10; Pg 10 of 45]
Correction 220:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show locations of the roof drain connection to the storm system.
[Plans C-10; Pg 10 of 45]
Correction 221:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout R-Tank IE.
[Plans C-10; Pg 10 of 45]
Correction 222:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide ductile iron pipe for any storm conveyance with less than 3ft of cover.
[Plans C-10; Pg 10 of 45]
Correction 223:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout diameter.
[Plans C-10; Pg 10 of 45]
Correction 224:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-12in called out on Sht 41 of 45.
[Plans C-10; Pg 10 of 45]
Correction 225:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-C9?
[Plans C-10; Pg 10 of 45]
Correction 226:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Readability.
[Plans C-10; Pg 10 of 45]
Correction 227:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout diameter.
[Plans C-10; Pg 10 of 45]
Correction 228:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Identify existing and proposed contours.
[Plans C-10; Pg 10 of 45]
Correction 229:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout that the existing storm facility will be remediated during Phase 2.
[Plans C-10; Pg 10 of 45]
Correction 230:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide an "Overall" sheet for water and sewer showing alignments. (Okay to combine water and sewer on one sheet, if desired).
[Plans C-11; Pg 11 of 45]
Correction 231:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Clarify proposed tenant spaces. Any space involved with food preparation requires an external grease interceptor. If tenancy is unknown, it may be in the project's best interest to install a grease interceptor at this time rather than at time of Tenant Improvement.
[Plans C-11; Pg 11 of 45]
Correction 232:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout Sampling Connection per Std Detail 04.03.04.
[Plans C-11; Pg 11 of 45]
Correction 233:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout diameter.
[Plans C-11; Pg 11 of 45]
Correction 234:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide utility crossing information.
[Plans C-11; Pg 11 of 45]
Correction 235:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coordinate pipe slope with existing elevations from the Record Dwgs associated with Permit E-21-0426.
[Plans C-11; Pg 11 of 45]
Correction 236:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Delineate the regulated floodplain on the plan.
[Plans C-11; Pg 11 of 45]
Correction 237:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout Sampling Connection per Std Detail 04.03.04.
[Plans C-11; Pg 11 of 45]
Correction 238:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout "existing".
[Plans C-11; Pg 11 of 45]
Correction 239:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout "existing".
[Plans C-11; Pg 11 of 45]
Correction 240:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Ductile Iron per Record Dwgs.
[Plans C-11; Pg 11 of 45]
Correction 241:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-Record Dwgs indicate this connection as a simple tie-in to an existing stub and no structure.
[Plans C-11; Pg 11 of 45]
Correction 242:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coordinate existing elevations with the Record Dwgs associated with Permit E-21-0426.
[Plans C-11; Pg 11 of 45]
Correction 243:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coordinate pipe run with the Record Dwgs associated with Permit E-21-0426.
[Plans C-11; Pg 11 of 45]
Correction 244:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coordinate existing elevations with the Record Dwgs associated with Permit E-21-0426.
[Plans C-11; Pg 11 of 45]
Correction 245:
See Document Markup
Comments:
East Side Sewer?
[Plans C-11; Pg 11 of 45]
Correction 246:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-C12?
[Plans C-11; Pg 11 of 45]
Correction 247:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Identify the storm system background (typ).
[Plans C-11; Pg 11 of 45]
Correction 248:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Readability.
[Plans C-11; Pg 11 of 45]
Correction 249:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout diameter.
[Plans C-11; Pg 11 of 45]
Correction 250:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide 10ft of horizontal separation btwn water and sewer or encase sewer in accordance with Std Detail 03.01.03-1&2.
[Plans C-11; Pg 11 of 45]
Correction 251:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout diameter.
[Plans C-11; Pg 11 of 45]
Correction 252:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-C13?
[Plans C-11; Pg 11 of 45]
Correction 253:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide utility crossing information.
[Plans C-12; Pg 12 of 45]
Correction 254:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout diameter.
[Plans C-12; Pg 12 of 45]
Correction 255:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-C11?
[Plans C-12; Pg 12 of 45]
Correction 256:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout diameter.
[Plans C-12; Pg 12 of 45]
Correction 257:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout diameter.
[Plans C-12; Pg 12 of 45]
Correction 258:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout diameter.
[Plans C-12; Pg 12 of 45]
Correction 259:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout east and south pipes.
[Plans C-12; Pg 12 of 45]
Correction 260:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout diameter.
[Plans C-12; Pg 12 of 45]
Correction 261:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Clarify what is supposed to be happening here?
[Plans C-12; Pg 12 of 45]
Correction 262:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Revise IEs to reflect downstream system.
[Plans C-12; Pg 12 of 45]
Correction 263:
See Document Markup
Comments:
North IE = 69.08. Revise accordingly.
[Plans C-12; Pg 12 of 45]
Correction 264:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout diameter.
[Plans C-12; Pg 12 of 45]
Correction 265:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-IE is below the downstream outlet pipe. Revise accordingly.
[Plans C-12; Pg 12 of 45]
Correction 266:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-IE is below the downstream outlet pipe. Revise accordingly.
[Plans C-12; Pg 12 of 45]
Correction 267:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-IE is higher than the side sewer IE.
[Plans C-12; Pg 12 of 45]
Correction 268:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-IE is higher than the side sewer IE.
[Plans C-12; Pg 12 of 45]
Correction 269:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Identify the storm system background (typ).
[Plans C-12; Pg 12 of 45]
Correction 270:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-C11?
[Plans C-13; Pg 13 of 45]
Correction 271:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Readability.
[Plans C-13; Pg 13 of 45]
Correction 272:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout diameter.
[Plans C-13; Pg 13 of 45]
Correction 273:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout stub.
[Plans C-13; Pg 13 of 45]
Correction 274:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Readability.
[Plans C-13; Pg 13 of 45]
Correction 275:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide utility crossing information.
[Plans C-13; Pg 13 of 45]
Correction 276:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Delineate the regulated floodplain on the plan.
[Plans C-13; Pg 13 of 45]
Correction 277:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add Fire Code Official approval block to the Water plan sheets. (Ref. City Stds Section 1.4.
[Plans C-14; Pg 14 of 45]
Correction 278:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show proposed sewer backgrounds.
[Plans C-14; Pg 14 of 45]
Correction 279:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide utility crossing information.
[Plans C-14; Pg 14 of 45]
Correction 280:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Indicate valve locations.
[Plans C-14; Pg 14 of 45]
Correction 281:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Note: If any buildings require a fire system pump, the FDC shall connect to the downstream (discharge) side of the pump outlet.
[Plans C-14; Pg 14 of 45]
Correction 282:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Note: See Fire Code Official's comments regarding hydrant and FDC locations. Revise accordingly.
[Plans C-14; Pg 14 of 45]
Correction 283:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Delineate the regulated floodplain on the plan.
[Plans C-14; Pg 14 of 45]
Correction 284:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Specify meter size.
[Plans C-14; Pg 14 of 45]
Correction 285:
See Document Markup
Comments:
FDC must be located within 10ft-15ft of a hydrant. Also, the FDC is routed thru the DDCVA unless using a pump.
[Plans C-14; Pg 14 of 45]
Correction 286:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-detail reference.
[Plans C-14; Pg 14 of 45]
Correction 287:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Confirm-Callout info.
[Plans C-14; Pg 14 of 45]
Correction 288:
See Document Markup
Comments:
City Standards require meters to be located at the ROW. Meter locations shall be subject to approval of the Water Dept. (Typ)
[Plans C-14; Pg 14 of 45]
Correction 289:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout 2ft min clearance to storm line.
[Plans C-14; Pg 14 of 45]
Correction 290:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-C16?
[Plans C-14; Pg 14 of 45]
Correction 291:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Identify the storm system background (typ).
[Plans C-14; Pg 14 of 45]
Correction 292:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout DCVA.
[Plans C-14; Pg 14 of 45]
Correction 293:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout fitting, type, valve, and thrust block.
[Plans C-14; Pg 14 of 45]
Correction 294:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-90 bend.
[Plans C-14; Pg 14 of 45]
Correction 295:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-two valves shown.
[Plans C-14; Pg 14 of 45]
Correction 296:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Specify meter size and callout DCVA.
[Plans C-14; Pg 14 of 45]
Correction 297:
See Document Markup
Comments:
FDC must be located within 10ft-15ft of a hydrant. Also, the FDC is routed thru the DDCVA unless using a pump.
[Plans C-14; Pg 14 of 45]
Correction 298:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-detail reference.
[Plans C-14; Pg 14 of 45]
Correction 299:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-detail reference.
[Plans C-14; Pg 14 of 45]
Correction 300:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Max hydrant run is 20ft. Use 8in branch line to supply hydrant lead as shown. Callout fitting info.
[Plans C-14; Pg 14 of 45]
Correction 301:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout fitting, type, valve, and thrust block.
[Plans C-14; Pg 14 of 45]
Correction 302:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-are two valves necessary at this location?
[Plans C-14; Pg 14 of 45]
Correction 303:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-cutting-in new valve?
[Plans C-14; Pg 14 of 45]
Correction 304:
See Document Markup
Comments:
City Stds require tapping sleeve for new connections to existing mains. Revise accordingly.
[Plans C-14; Pg 14 of 45]
Correction 305:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout pipe run.
[Plans C-14; Pg 14 of 45]
Correction 306:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout fitting, type, valve, and thrust block.
[Plans C-14; Pg 14 of 45]
Correction 307:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout hydrant assembly.
[Plans C-14; Pg 14 of 45]
Correction 308:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout fitting and thrust block.
[Plans C-14; Pg 14 of 45]
Correction 309:
See Document Markup
Comments:
City Stds require tapping sleeve for new connections to existing mains. Revise accordingly.
[Plans C-14; Pg 14 of 45]
Correction 310:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-is valve necessary?
[Plans C-14; Pg 14 of 45]
Correction 311:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout fitting, type, valve, and thrust block.
[Plans C-14; Pg 14 of 45]
Correction 312:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Water-Storm Vault conflict...revise accordingly.
[Plans C-14; Pg 14 of 45]
Correction 313:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-leader location.
[Plans C-14; Pg 14 of 45]
Correction 314:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout fitting, type, valve, and thrust block.
[Plans C-14; Pg 14 of 45]
Correction 315:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout pipe run.
[Plans C-14; Pg 14 of 45]
Correction 316:
See Document Markup
Comments:
See comment on Sht C11 regarding separation between water and sewer.
[Plans C-14; Pg 14 of 45]
Correction 317:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-C15?
[Plans C-14; Pg 14 of 45]
Correction 318:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-Cross (MJxMJxMJxFL).
[Plans C-14; Pg 14 of 45]
Correction 319:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-detail reference.
[Plans C-14; Pg 14 of 45]
Correction 320:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout fitting, type, valve, and thrust block.
[Plans C-14; Pg 14 of 45]
Correction 321:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide 3ft clear zone and level area all around hydrant.
[Plans C-14; Pg 14 of 45]
Correction 322:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Clarify-hydrant port direction.
[Plans C-14; Pg 14 of 45]
Correction 323:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-detail reference.
[Plans C-14; Pg 14 of 45]
Correction 324:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add Fire Code Official approval block to the Water plan sheets. (Ref. City Stds Section 1.4.
[Plans C-15; Pg 15 of 45]
Correction 325:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show proposed sewer backgrounds.
[Plans C-15; Pg 15 of 45]
Correction 326:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide utility crossing information.
[Plans C-15; Pg 15 of 45]
Correction 327:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Indicate valve locations.
[Plans C-15; Pg 15 of 45]
Correction 328:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Note: If any buildings require a fire system pump, the FDC shall connect to the downstream (discharge) side of the pump outlet.
[Plans C-15; Pg 15 of 45]
Correction 329:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Note: See Fire Code Official's comments regarding hydrant and FDC locations. Revise accordingly.
[Plans C-15; Pg 15 of 45]
Correction 330:
See Document Markup
Comments:
City Stds require tapping sleeve for new connections to existing mains. Revise accordingly.
[Plans C-15; Pg 15 of 45]
Correction 331:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Specify meter size and callout DCVA.
[Plans C-15; Pg 15 of 45]
Correction 332:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Specify meter size and callout DCVA.
[Plans C-15; Pg 15 of 45]
Correction 333:
See Document Markup
Comments:
FDC must be located within 10ft-15ft of a hydrant. Also, the FDC is routed thru the DDCVA unless using a pump.
[Plans C-15; Pg 15 of 45]
Correction 334:
See Document Markup
Comments:
FDC must be located within 10ft-15ft of a hydrant. Also, the FDC is routed thru the DDCVA unless using a pump.
[Plans C-15; Pg 15 of 45]
Correction 335:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-C14?
[Plans C-15; Pg 15 of 45]
Correction 336:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-C17?
[Plans C-15; Pg 15 of 45]
Correction 337:
See Document Markup
Comments:
City Stds require tapping sleeve for new connections to existing mains. Revise accordingly.
[Plans C-15; Pg 15 of 45]
Correction 338:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout fitting, type, valve, and thrust block.
[Plans C-15; Pg 15 of 45]
Correction 339:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout fitting, type, valve, and thrust block.
[Plans C-15; Pg 15 of 45]
Correction 340:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-valve location.
[Plans C-15; Pg 15 of 45]
Correction 341:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-leader location.
[Plans C-15; Pg 15 of 45]
Correction 342:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Rotate hydrant to face drive aisle.
[Plans C-15; Pg 15 of 45]
Correction 343:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-two valves shown.
[Plans C-15; Pg 15 of 45]
Correction 344:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Max hydrant run is 20ft. Use 8in branch line to supply hydrant lead as shown. Callout fitting info.
[Plans C-14; Pg 14 of 45]
Correction 345:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout fitting, type, valve, and thrust block.
[Plans C-15; Pg 15 of 45]
Correction 346:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Clarify.
[Plans C-15; Pg 15 of 45]
Correction 347:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-detail reference.
[Plans C-15; Pg 15 of 45]
Correction 348:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Clarify.
[Plans C-15; Pg 15 of 45]
Correction 349:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout fitting, type, valve, and thrust block.
[Plans C-15; Pg 15 of 45]
Correction 350:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Rotate hydrant to face drive aisle.
[Plans C-15; Pg 15 of 45]
Correction 351:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add Fire Code Official approval block to the Water plan sheets. (Ref. City Stds Section 1.4.
[Plans C-16; Pg 16 of 45]
Correction 352:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-C14?
[Plans C-16; Pg 16 of 45]
Correction 353:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show proposed sewer backgrounds.
[Plans C-16; Pg 16 of 45]
Correction 354:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Indicate valve locations.
[Plans C-16; Pg 16 of 45]
Correction 355:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Note: If any buildings require a fire system pump, the FDC shall connect to the downstream (discharge) side of the pump outlet.
[Plans C-16; Pg 16 of 45]
Correction 356:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Delineate the regulated floodplain on the plan.
[Plans C-16; Pg 16 of 45]
Correction 357:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-C17?
[Plans C-16; Pg 16 of 45]
Correction 358:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Clarify-if main jogs, callout fitting info.
[Plans C-16; Pg 16 of 45]
Correction 359:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout fitting, type, valve, and thrust block.
[Plans C-16; Pg 16 of 45]
Correction 360:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout fitting, type, valve, and thrust block.
[Plans C-16; Pg 16 of 45]
Correction 361:
See Document Markup
Comments:
FDC must be located within 10ft-15ft of a hydrant. Also, the FDC is routed thru the DDCVA unless using a pump.
[Plans C-16; Pg 16 of 45]
Correction 362:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-detail reference.
[Plans C-16; Pg 16 of 45]
Correction 363:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-detail reference.
[Plans C-16; Pg 16 of 45]
Correction 364:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout fitting, type, valve, and thrust block.
[Plans C-16; Pg 16 of 45]
Correction 365:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add Fire Code Official approval block to the Water plan sheets. (Ref. City Stds Section 1.4.
[Plans C-17; Pg 17 of 45]
Correction 366:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show proposed sewer backgrounds.
[Plans C-17; Pg 17 of 45]
Correction 367:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Indicate valve locations.
[Plans C-17; Pg 17 of 45]
Correction 368:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Note: If any buildings require a fire system pump, the FDC shall connect to the downstream (discharge) side of the pump outlet.
[Plans C-17; Pg 17 of 45]
Correction 369:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-C16?
[Plans C-17; Pg 17 of 45]
Correction 370:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-C15?
[Plans C-17; Pg 17 of 45]
Correction 371:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Specify meter size and callout DCVA.
[Plans C-17; Pg 17 of 45]
Correction 372:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-detail reference.
[Plans C-17; Pg 17 of 45]
Correction 373:
See Document Markup
Comments:
FDC must be located within 10ft-15ft of a hydrant. Also, the FDC is routed thru the DDCVA unless using a pump.
[Plans C-17; Pg 17 of 45]
Correction 374:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-detail reference.
[Plans C-17; Pg 17 of 45]
Correction 375:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout fitting, type, valve, and thrust block.
[Plans C-17; Pg 17 of 45]
Correction 376:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-detail reference.
[Plans C-17; Pg 17 of 45]
Correction 377:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-detail reference.
[Plans C-17; Pg 17 of 45]
Correction 378:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Specify meter size and callout DCVA.
[Plans C-17; Pg 17 of 45]
Correction 379:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Specify meter size and callout DCVA.
[Plans C-17; Pg 17 of 45]
Correction 380:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Clarify.
[Plans C-17; Pg 17 of 45]
Correction 381:
See Document Markup
Comments:
FDC must be located within 10ft-15ft of a hydrant. Also, the FDC is routed thru the DDCVA unless using a pump.
[Plans C-17; Pg 17 of 45]
Correction 382:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout fitting, type, valve, and thrust block.
[Plans C-17; Pg 17 of 45]
Correction 383:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Max hydrant run is 20ft. Use 8in branch line to supply hydrant lead as shown. Callout fitting info.
[Plans C-17; Pg 17 of 45]
Correction 384:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout 12in min clear to storm.
[Plans C-18; Pg 18 of 45]
Correction 385:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout 12in min clear to storm.
[Plans C-18; Pg 18 of 45]
Correction 386:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coordinate IE w Sht C7.
[Plans C-18; Pg 18 of 45]
Correction 387:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coordinate IE w Sht C7.
[Plans C-18; Pg 18 of 45]
Correction 388:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coordinate Profile Reference w Sht C7.
[Plans C-18; Pg 18 of 45]
Correction 389:
See Document Markup
Comments:
There are two water pipes crossing the profile.
[Plans C-18; Pg 18 of 45]
Correction 390:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide ductile iron pipe for any storm conveyance with less than 3ft of cover.
[Plans C-18; Pg 18 of 45]
Correction 391:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout 12in min clear to storm.
[Plans C-18; Pg 18 of 45]
Correction 392:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coordinate IE w Sht C7.
[Plans C-18; Pg 18 of 45]
Correction 393:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-36in detention pipe called out on Page 11 of storm report.
[Plans C-18; Pg 18 of 45]
Correction 394:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coordinate Profile Reference w Sht C7.
[Plans C-18; Pg 18 of 45]
Correction 395:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coordinate structure information w Sht C7.
[Plans C-18; Pg 18 of 45]
Correction 396:
See Document Markup
Comments:
At structures confirm whether Type 2 CB or Type 2 manhole used. Also, callout diameter and lid information.
[Plans C-18; Pg 18 of 45]
Correction 397:
See Document Markup
Comments:
If crossing is less than 12in, provide Etha Foam sheet per attached.
[Plans C-18; Pg 18 of 45]
Correction 398:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-pipe material callout.
[Plans C-18; Pg 18 of 45]
Correction 399:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout watermain.
[Plans C-18; Pg 18 of 45]
Correction 400:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coordinate structure information w review comments on Sht C7.
[Plans C-18; Pg 18 of 45]
Correction 401:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-SDR?
[Plans C-18; Pg 18 of 45]
Correction 402:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-SDR?
[Plans C-18; Pg 18 of 45]
Correction 403:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-SDR?
[Plans C-19; Pg 19 of 45]
Correction 404:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide ductile iron pipe for any storm conveyance with less than 3ft of cover.
[Plans C-10; Pg 10 of 45]
Correction 405:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coordinate structure info with Sht C9.
[Plans C-19; Pg 19 of 45]
Correction 406:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coordinate structure info with Sht C9.
[Plans C-19; Pg 19 of 45]
Correction 407:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show and callout structure.
[Plans C-19; Pg 19 of 45]
Correction 408:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Confirm-is the intent to show this profile continuing to the R-Tank?
[Plans C-19; Pg 19 of 45]
Correction 409:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout IE.
[Plans C-19; Pg 19 of 45]
Correction 410:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout structure information (4 plcs).
[Plans C-19; Pg 19 of 45]
Correction 411:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout pipe information (4 plcs).
[Plans C-19; Pg 19 of 45]
Correction 412:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show Water Crossings.
[Plans C-20; Pg 20 of 45]
Correction 413:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout "existing".
[Plans C-20; Pg 20 of 45]
Correction 414:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coordinate existing elevations with the Record Dwgs associated with Permit E-21-0426.
[Plans C-20; Pg 20 of 45]
Correction 415:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coordinate pipe run with the Record Dwgs associated with Permit E-21-0426.
[Plans C-20; Pg 20 of 45]
Correction 416:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout "existing".
[Plans C-20; Pg 20 of 45]
Correction 417:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coordinate existing elevations with the Record Dwgs associated with Permit E-21-0426.
[Plans C-20; Pg 20 of 45]
Correction 418:
See Document Markup
Comments:
North Side Sewer?
[Plans C-20; Pg 20 of 45]
Correction 419:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Ductile Iron per Record Dwgs.
[Plans C-20; Pg 20 of 45]
Correction 420:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout "existing".
[Plans C-20; Pg 20 of 45]
Correction 421:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-Record Dwgs indicate this connection as a simple tie-in to an existing stub and no structure.
[Plans C-20; Pg 20 of 45]
Correction 422:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout structure diameters (typ).
[Plans C-20; Pg 20 of 45
Correction 423:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout structure diameters (typ).
[Plans C-20; Pg 20 of 45
Correction 424:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-24in?
[Plans C-20; Pg 20 of 45]
Correction 425:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coordinate IE with Sht C12.
[Plans C-20; Pg 20 of 45]
Correction 426:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coordinate IE with Sht C12.
[Plans C-20; Pg 20 of 45]
Correction 427:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-4?
[Plans C-20; Pg 20 of 45]
Correction 428:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Storm drain crosses in two places.
[Plans C-20; Pg 20 of 45]
Correction 429:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout structure diameters (typ).
[Plans C-20; Pg 20 of 45
Correction 430:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout east and north pipes.
[Plans C-20; Pg 20 of 45]
Correction 431:
See Document Markup
Comments:
These IEs are below the outlet.
[Plans C-20; Pg 20 of 45]
Correction 432:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Clarify-what is this pipe serving?
[Plans C-20; Pg 20 of 45]
Correction 433:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Note: Details marked with a red X are not relevant to this application. EoR's discretion whether to remove from the planset or not.
[Plans C-21; Pg 21 of 45]
Correction 434:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add City Std Detail 01.02.10.
[Plans C-21; Pg 21 of 45]
Correction 435:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use abbreviated legal description in title.
[Plans C-21; Pg 21 of 45]
Correction 436:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide a separate detail of the control riser with relevant information or callout on the city detail. Include notch info.
[Plans C-22; Pg 22 of 45]
Correction 437:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add City Std Details: 01.02.08a // 02.01.05 // 02.02.01 // 02.02.03.
[Plans C-22; Pg 22 of 45]
Correction 438:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use abbreviated legal description in title.
[Plans C-22; Pg 22 of 45]
Correction 439:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add City Std Detail 04.03.04 // 04.06.01 (as applicable) // 04.06.02 (as applicable).
[Plans C-23; Pg 23 of 45]
Correction 440:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use abbreviated legal description in title.
[Plans C-23; Pg 23 of 45]
Correction 441:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add City Std Detail 03.04.01 // 03.11.01.
[Plans C-24; Pg 24 of 45]
Correction 442:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use abbreviated legal description in title.
[Plans C-24; Pg 24 of 45]
Correction 443:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Place with Details 1&2/C24.
[Plans C-25; Pg 25 of 45]
Correction 444:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use abbreviated legal description in title.
[Plans C-25; Pg 25 of 45]
Correction 445:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add City Std Detail 06.01.01 // 06.01.02 // 06.01.03 // 06.01.04.
[Plans C-26; Pg 26 of 45]
Correction 446:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use abbreviated legal description in title.
[Plans C-26; Pg 26 of 45]
Correction 447:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Design for the 2yr release rate.
[Plans C-27; Pg 27 of 45]
Correction 448:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use abbreviated legal description in title.
[Plans C-27; Pg 27 of 45]
Correction 449:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Due to high groundwater, provide a manufactured synthetic liner to prevent groundwater intrusion into the detention facilities. Callout the synthetic liner requirements for material, installation, and protection; and show on the RTank details. In addition, provide buoyancy verification (calculations and/or certification letter).
[Plans Sht C-28; Pg 28 of 45]
Correction 450:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use abbreviated legal description in title.
[Plans C-28; Pg 28 of 45]
Correction 451:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Confirm module layout based on the subasin analysis (stage-storage requirements) per Storm Report comments, Pg 117 of 164.
[Plans C-28; Pg 28 of 45]
Correction 452:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use abbreviated legal description in title.
[Plans C-29; Pg 29 of 45]
Correction 453:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Due to high groundwater, use impermeable synthetic liner.
[Plans C-29; Pg 29 of 45]
Correction 454:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-12in called out on Sht 7 of 45.
[Plans C-29; Pg 29 of 45]
Correction 455:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-that this minimum cover is adequate to support EV Outrigger load of 23,000lb point load anywhere on RTank; as well as HS20 loading.
[Plans C-29; Pg 29 of 45]
Correction 456:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Confirm stage-storage requirements with subasin analysis per Storm Report comments, Pg 117 of 164.
[Plans C-29; Pg 29 of 45]
Correction 457:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Ensure available storage accounts for 6in of sediment storage per Ecology's requirements.
[Plans C-29; Pg 29 of 45]
Correction 458:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide the 2yr and 10yr, water surface elevations.
[Plans C-29; Pg 29 of 45]
Correction 459:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use abbreviated legal description in title.
[Plans C-31; Pg 30 of 45]
Correction 460:
See Document Markup
Comments:
NOTE: Sheet sequencing changed.
[Plans C-31; Pg 30 of 45]
Correction 461:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-that this minimum cover is adequate to support EV Outrigger load of 23,000lb point load anywhere on RTank; as well as HS20 loading.
[Plans C-30; Pg 30 of 45]
Correction 462:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Confirm stage-storage requirements with subasin analysis per Storm Report comments, Pg 117 of 164.
[Plans C-30; Pg 30 of 45]
Correction 463:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Confirm stage-storage requirements with subasin analysis per Storm Report comments, Pg 117 of 164.
[Plans C-30; Pg 30 of 45]
Correction 464:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Ensure available storage accounts for 6in of sediment storage per Ecology's requirements.
[Plans C-30; Pg 30 of 45]
Correction 465:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Due to high groundwater, use impermeable synthetic liner.
[Plans C-30; Pg 30 of 45]
Correction 466:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use abbreviated legal description in title.
[Plans C-32; Pg 31 of 45]
Correction 467:
See Document Markup
Comments:
NOTE: Sheet sequencing changed.
[Plans C-32; Pg 31 of 45]
Correction 468:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use abbreviated legal description in title.
[Plans C-33; Pg 32 of 45]
Correction 469:
See Document Markup
Comments:
NOTE: Sheet sequencing changed.
[Plans C-33; Pg 32 of 45]
Correction 470:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use abbreviated legal description in title.
[Plans C-34; Pg 33 of 45]
Correction 471:
See Document Markup
Comments:
NOTE: Sheet sequencing changed.
[Plans C-34; Pg 33 of 45]
Correction 472:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Due to high groundwater, specify synthetic impermeable liner.
[Plans C-34; Pg 33 of 45]
Correction 473:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use abbreviated legal description in title.
[Plans C-35; Pg 34 of 45]
Correction 474:
See Document Markup
Comments:
NOTE: Sheet sequencing changed.
[Plans C-35; Pg 34 of 45]
Correction 475:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Due to high groundwater, provide a manufactured synthetic liner to prevent groundwater intrusion into the detention facilities. Callout the synthetic liner requirements for material, installation, and protection; and show on the RTank details. In addition, provide buoyancy verification (calculations and/or certification letter).
[Plans Sht C-35; Pg 34 of 45]
Correction 476:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Confirm module layout based on the subasin analysis (stage-storage requirements) per Storm Report comments, Pg 117 of 164.
[Plans C-35; Pg 34 of 45]
Correction 477:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use abbreviated legal description in title.
[Plans C-36; Pg 35 of 45]
Correction 478:
See Document Markup
Comments:
NOTE: Sheet sequencing changed.
[Plans C-36; Pg 35 of 45]
Correction 479:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Due to high groundwater, use impermeable synthetic liner.
[Plans C-36; Pg 35 of 45]
Correction 480:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-that this minimum cover is adequate to support EV Outrigger load of 23,000lb point load anywhere on RTank; as well as HS20 loading.
[Plans C-36; Pg 35 of 45]
Correction 481:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Confirm stage-storage requirements with subasin analysis per Storm Report comments, Pg 117 of 164.
[Plans C-36; Pg 35 of 45]
Correction 482:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Ensure available storage accounts for 6in of sediment storage per Ecology's requirements.
[Plans C-36; Pg 35 of 45]
Correction 483:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-24in called out on Sht 8 of 45.
[Plans C-36; Pg 35 of 45]
Correction 484:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide the 2yr and 10yr, water surface elevations.
[Plans C-36; Pg 35 of 45]
Correction 485:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use abbreviated legal description in title.
[Plans C-37; Pg 36 of 45]
Correction 486:
See Document Markup
Comments:
NOTE: Sheet sequencing changed.
[Plans C-37; Pg 36 of 45]
Correction 487:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-that this minimum cover is adequate to support EV Outrigger load of 23,000lb point load anywhere on RTank; as well as HS20 loading.
[Plans C-37; Pg 36 of 45]
Correction 488:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Confirm stage-storage requirements with subasin analysis per Storm Report comments, Pg 117 of 164.
[Plans C-37; Pg 36 of 45]
Correction 489:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Ensure available storage accounts for 6in of sediment storage per Ecology's requirements.
[Plans C-37; Pg 36 of 45]
Correction 490:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Confirm stage-storage requirements with subasin analysis per Storm Report comments, Pg 117 of 164.
[Plans C-37; Pg 36 of 45]
Correction 491:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Due to high groundwater, use impermeable synthetic liner.
[Plans C-37; Pg 36 of 45]
Correction 492:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use abbreviated legal description in title.
[Plans C-38; Pg 37 of 45]
Correction 493:
See Document Markup
Comments:
NOTE: Sheet sequencing changed.
[Plans C-38; Pg 37 of 45]
Correction 494:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use abbreviated legal description in title.
[Plans C-39; Pg 38 of 45]
Correction 495:
See Document Markup
Comments:
NOTE: Sheet sequencing changed.
[Plans C-39; Pg 38 of 45]
Correction 496:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use abbreviated legal description in title.
[Plans C-40; Pg 39 of 45]
Correction 497:
See Document Markup
Comments:
NOTE: Sheet sequencing changed.
[Plans C-40; Pg 39 of 45]
Correction 498:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Due to high groundwater, specify synthetic impermeable liner.
[Plans C-40; Pg 39 of 45]
Correction 499:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use abbreviated legal description in title.
[Plans C-41; Pg 40 of 45]
Correction 500:
See Document Markup
Comments:
NOTE: Sheet sequencing changed.
[Plans C-41; Pg 40 of 45]
Correction 501:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Due to high groundwater, provide a manufactured synthetic liner to prevent groundwater intrusion into the detention facilities. Callout the synthetic liner requirements for material, installation, and protection; and show on the RTank details. In addition, provide buoyancy verification (calculations and/or certification letter).
[Plans Sht C-41; Pg 40 of 45]
Correction 502:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Confirm module layout based on the subasin analysis (stage-storage requirements) per Storm Report comments, Pg 117 of 164.
[Plans C-41; Pg 40 of 45]
Correction 503:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use abbreviated legal description in title.
[Plans C-42; Pg 41 of 45]
Correction 504:
See Document Markup
Comments:
NOTE: Sheet sequencing changed.
[Plans C-42; Pg 41 of 45]
Correction 505:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Due to high groundwater, use impermeable synthetic liner.
[Plans C-42; Pg 41 of 45]
Correction 506:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-that this minimum cover is adequate to support EV Outrigger load of 23,000lb point load anywhere on RTank; as well as HS20 loading.
[Plans C-42; Pg 41 of 45]
Correction 507:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Confirm stage-storage requirements with subasin analysis per Storm Report comments, Pg 117 of 164.
[Plans C-42; Pg 41 of 45]
Correction 508:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Ensure available storage accounts for 6in of sediment storage per Ecology's requirements.
[Plans C-42; Pg 41 of 45]
Correction 509:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-24in called out on Sht 10 of 45.
[Plans C-42; Pg 41 of 45]
Correction 510:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide the 2yr and 10yr, water surface elevations.
[Plans C-42; Pg 41 of 45]
Correction 511:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use abbreviated legal description in title.
[Plans C-43; Pg 42 of 45]
Correction 512:
See Document Markup
Comments:
NOTE: Sheet sequencing changed.
[Plans C-43; Pg 42 of 45]
Correction 513:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-that this minimum cover is adequate to support EV Outrigger load of 23,000lb point load anywhere on RTank; as well as HS20 loading.
[Plans C-43; Pg 42 of 45]
Correction 514:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Confirm stage-storage requirements with subasin analysis per Storm Report comments, Pg 117 of 164.
[Plans C-43; Pg 42 of 45]
Correction 515:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Ensure available storage accounts for 6in of sediment storage per Ecology's requirements.
[Plans C-43; Pg 42 of 45]
Correction 516:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Confirm stage-storage requirements with subasin analysis per Storm Report comments, Pg 117 of 164.
[Plans C-43; Pg 42 of 45]
Correction 517:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Due to high groundwater, use impermeable synthetic liner.
[Plans C-43; Pg 42 of 45]
Correction 518:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use abbreviated legal description in title.
[Plans C-44; Pg 43 of 45]
Correction 519:
See Document Markup
Comments:
NOTE: Sheet sequencing changed.
[Plans C-44; Pg 43 of 45]
Correction 520:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use abbreviated legal description in title.
[Plans C-45; Pg 44 of 45]
Correction 521:
See Document Markup
Comments:
NOTE: Sheet sequencing changed.
[Plans C-45; Pg 44 of 45]
Correction 522:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use abbreviated legal description in title.
[Plans C-46; Pg 45 of 45]
Correction 523:
See Document Markup
Comments:
NOTE: Sheet sequencing changed.
[Plans C-46; Pg 45 of 45]
Correction 524:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Due to high groundwater, specify synthetic impermeable liner.
[Plans C-46; Pg 45 of 45]
Correction 525:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show locations of the roof drain connection to the storm system.
[Plans C-9; Pg 9 of 45]
Correction 526:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide ductile iron pipe for any storm conveyance with less than 3ft of cover.
[Plans C-9; Pg 9 of 45]
Correction 527:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide utility crossing information.
[Plans C-9; Pg 9 of 45]
Correction 528:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Delineate the regulated floodplain on the plan.
[Plans C-9; Pg 9 of 45]
Correction 529:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-C7?
[Plans C-9; Pg 9 of 45]
Correction 530:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-C10?
[Plans C-9; Pg 9 of 45]
Correction 531:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout R-Tank IE.
[Plans C-9; Pg 9 of 45]
Correction 532:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Match inverts.
[Plans C-9; Pg 9 of 45]
Correction 533:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Type 2 req'd. Callout diameter. If this is to be a manhole, callout diameter and lid info.
[Plans C-9; Pg 9 of 45]
Correction 534:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify pipe slope.
[Plans C-9; Pg 9 of 45]
Correction 535:
See Document Markup
Comments:
1ft min. cover required. Revise accordingly.
[Plans C-9; Pg 9 of 45]
Correction 536:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout pipe information.
[Plans C-9; Pg 9 of 45]
Correction 537:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Type 2 req'd. Callout diameter. If this is to be a manhole, callout diameter and lid info.
[Plans C-9; Pg 9 of 45]
Correction 538:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Type 2 req'd. Callout diameter. If this is to be a manhole, callout diameter and lid info.
[Plans C-9; Pg 9 of 45]
Correction 539:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Type 2 req'd. Callout diameter. If this is to be a manhole, callout diameter and lid info.
[Plans C-9; Pg 9 of 45]
Correction 540:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Submit Traffic Signal Plans with Shaw Road frontage improvement plans along with channelization and signage.
[Signal TS-01; Sht 1 of 5]
Correction 541:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per City Standards Section 1.8 provide a landscape plan with a utility overlay (water, sewer, storm) and ensure no trees are located within 10ft of utility equipment (meters, hydrants, CBs, etc).
[Landscape L1.0; Pg 1 of 10]
Correction 542:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coordinate CSWPPP with the review comments associated with the CFG application PRGR20230972.
[CSWPPP; Pg 1 of 14]
Correction 543:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Prior to Occupancy, submit a DRAFT version of the City's Stormwater Management Facilities Agreement with an O&M manual using the maintenance activities described in the City's Stormwater Site Management Plan. The agreement shall be recorded with the Pierce County Auditors Office.
[O&M Manual; Pg 1 of 25]
Correction 544:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide R-Tank O&M information.
[O&M Manual; Pg 1 of 25]
Correction 545:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Clarify-how is this area (backslope btwn El. 74 and ROW) being conveyed to the detention system? Its not included in the bypass basin.
[Storm Report; Pg 34 of 164]
Correction 546:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Clarify-how is this area (backslope btwn El. 76 and ROW) being conveyed to the detention system? Its not included in the bypass basin.
[Plans C-5; Pg 5 of 45]
Correction 547:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Clarify-how is this area (backslope btwn El. 74 and ROW) being conveyed to the detention system? Its not part of the bypass basin contained in the storm report.
[Plans C-3; Pg 3 of 45]
Correction 548:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Clarify-how is this area (backslope btwn El. 76 and ROW) being conveyed to the detention system? Its not part of the bypass basin contained in the storm report.
[Plans C-5; Pg 5 of 45]
Correction 549:
See Document Markup
Comments:
NOTE TO ENGR: This is an existing 54in inside drop structure. If two additional pipes will enter the structure as shown, provide a plan view of the interior of the structure indicating the location of the access rungs in relation to the pipe inlets, the clearances between the drops at the inlets, and the clearances at the bottom of the structure. Ensure adequate access for maintenance. It may be better to use outside drops or revise the new sewer alignment to make the tie-in elsewhere.
[Plans C-11; Pg 11 of 45]
Correction 550:
See Document Markup
Comments:
See comments on the 'Existing Conditions Map'.
[Storm Report; Pg 5 of 448]
Correction 551:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Actually very little runoff generated onsite discharges to the eastern stream channel.
[Storm Report; Pg 5 of 448]
Correction 552:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Actually the existing storm facility releases through a control structure which is conveyed to the Pioneer Way ditch located at the north property line via a 15in storm pipe...revise accordingly.
[Storm Report; Pg 6 of 448]
Correction 553:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Please be aware that the existing storm facility's berm has been breached by the stream on the east side of the site due to lack of maintenance of the pond. The stream is currently being conveyed through the facility and outlet structure, then northward to Pioneer Way ditch via the 15in storm main.
[Storm Report; Pg 6 of 448]
Correction 554:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Very little surface runoff generated on the site is released to the east channel. With the exception of the existing storm pond serving the properties to the south, most of the onsite surface water either collects in the NW corner of the site or enters the Pioneer Way ditch...revise accordingly.
[Storm Report; Pg 6 of 448]
Correction 555:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-"east"?
[Storm Report; Pg 6 of 448]
Correction 556:
See Document Markup
Comments:
FYI-It is more than a mile to the Puyallup River along the project's release route which includes the Pioneer Way north ditch and main stem of Deer Creek.
[Storm Report; Pg 6 of 448]
Correction 557:
See Document Markup
Comments:
The WQ biopod is located upstream of the RTanks.
[Storm Report; Pg 6 of 448]
Correction 558:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-12in pipe called out on civils.
[Storm Report; Pg 6 of 448]
Correction 559:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CLARIFY-Biopod?
[Storm Report; Pg 6 of 448]
Correction 560:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CLARIFY-Biopod?
[Storm Report; Pg 6 of 448]
Correction 561:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Prior to PH2 approval, provide a backwater analysis of the Pioneer Avenue conveyance system as outlined in City Standards Section 204.3 considering the tailwater elevation (OHWM) of the Pioneer Avenue north ditch, west of Shaw Road. The analysis shall include runoff from onsite (developed conditions) and offsite (existing conditions) basins tributary to the discharge location.
[Storm Report; Pg 6 of 448]
Correction 562:
See Document Markup
Comments:
See comment in Section 2.2.
[Storm Report; Pg 7 of 448]
Correction 563:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY- Exhibit D2 seems more applicable for WQ.
[Storm Report; Pg 7 of 448]
Correction 564:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CLARIFY-three tanks are indicated in Phase 1 (#1, #2, and #3).
[Storm Report; Pg 8 of 448]
Correction 565:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CLARIFY-please add commentary that the pumping is only during the construction phase and the permanent condition will be gravity release.
[Storm Report; Pg 8 of 448]
Correction 566:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show Bypass basins on an exhibit.
[Storm Report; Pg 8 of 448]
Correction 567:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CLARIFY-Biopod?
[Storm Report; Pg 8 of 448]
Correction 568:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Discuss Shaw Road frontage, Pioneer Way frontage, and future Phase 2 WQ aspects.
[Storm Report; Pg 8 of 448]
Correction 569:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Phase 1 only?
[Storm Report; Pg 8 of 448]
Correction 570:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Future RTank is not shown on the plans.
[Storm Report; Pg 9 of 448]
Correction 571:
See Document Markup
Comments:
FYI ONLY-the City's expectation is that the future replacement storm facility match flow control and water quality constraints of the original pond design (CES, Inc. design; single-event methodology). However, it is acceptable to redesign the facility using current storm regulations (continuous simulation modeling) although it seems counterintuitive due to the increase in facility size necessary to meet the continuous simulation methodology. Similarly, routing the upstream offsite existing flows through the proposed East Town flow control facilities also seems counterintuitive due to the impact to those facilities...particularly since there is an existing pipe outfall at Pioneer Way which serves the existing storm pond. Either way, most important will be to show that the release rates from the future facility, either stand-alone or combined with East Town's facilities, are equal or less than the release rates (2yr/10yr/100yr) of the original facility.
[Storm Report; Pg 9 of 448]
Correction 572:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add commentary that the RTanks can support the EV outrigger loads and include the manufacturer's confirmation letter.
[Storm Report; Pg 9 of 448]
Correction 573:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Ref Ecology Section III-2.4 too.
Correction 574:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Discuss Shaw Road frontage and Pioneer Way frontage flow control aspects.
[Storm Report; Pg 9 of 448]
Correction 575:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-no additional studies associated with the PH2 stream relocation?
[Storm Report; Pg 10 of 448]
Correction 576:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add: "A Stormwater Maintenance Agreement will be recorded at the time of Occupancy in accordance with City Standards."
[Storm Report; Pg 10 of 448]
Correction 577:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add: "Not a Part".
[Storm Report; Pg 13 of 448]
Correction 578:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add: "Not a Part".
[Storm Report; Pg 13 of 448]
Correction 579:
See Document Markup
Comments:
FYI...Section 1.2.1 states that Abbey Road Group was the surveyor.
[Storm Report; Pg 13 of 448]
Correction 580:
See Document Markup
Comments:
FYI...Section 1.2.1 states that Abbey Road Group was the surveyor.
[Storm Report; Pg 13 of 448]
Correction 581:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Identify/Delineate subasins (Upper, Lower, Bypass) used in the modeling.
[Storm Report; Pg 14 of 448]
Correction 582:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Identify "Future" detention facility location serving existing properties to the south.
[Storm Report; Pg 14 of 448]
Correction 583:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Please provide a surface area breakdown by phase and basin name. For example, PH1 MF Roof area = ______sf (ac); PH2 MF Roof area = ______sf (ac); etc. Provide a total for each basin breakdown. Also, include the frontage bypass basins.
[Storm Report; Pg 14 of 448]
Correction 584:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Prior to Occupancy, submit a DRAFT version of the City's Stormwater Management Facilities Agreement with an O&M manual using the maintenance activities described in the City's Stormwater Site Management Plan. The agreement shall be recorded with the Pierce County Auditors Office.
[Storm Report; Pg 195 of 448]
Correction 585:
See Document Markup
Comments:
At the time of submitting the Stormwater Management Facilities Agreement include the R-Tank and BioPod O&M information.
[Storm Report; Pg 195 of 448]
Correction 586:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Okay to leave this Appendix C empty at this time, since a formal O&M manual will be required at Closeout.
[Storm Report; Pg 195 of 448]
Correction 587:
See Document Markup
Comments:
PROVIDE-buoyancy calculations or buoyancy certification letter for the RTank system considering groundwater monitoring results conducted by Abbey Road Group.
[Storm Report; Pg 208 of 448]
Correction 588:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CLARIFY-shouldn't these PH2 areas be included in WQ Basin 4 since the future developed areas are discharging to Profile 4/C4.06 and ultimately the WQ4 Biopod?
[Storm Report; Pg 359 of 448]
Correction 589:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Please clarify that WQ for this area will be addressed in PH2.
[Storm Report; Pg 359 of 448]
Correction 590:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-1.37 per Plans, Sht C4.07.
[Storm Report; Pg 372 of 448]
Correction 591:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-18in called out on Sht C4.07.
[Storm Report; Pg 372 of 448]
Correction 592:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CLARIFY-the combined total storage for RTank2 and RTank3 is 141,452cf (78,829 + 62,623) per civil plans, Sht C4.21 and C4.31.
[Storm Report; Pg 372 of 448]
Correction 593:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coordinate calculations to reflect the actual control risers being used with the individual RTank system for each subasin.
[Storm Report; Pg 372 of 448]
Correction 594:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-5ft of live storage places riser top at El. 73.40. RTank 3 top of storage is El. 75.23. It appears that as RTank 3 fills, RTank 2 will go into overflow before RTank 3 storage is fully utilized (See comments Sht C4.07 too).
[Storm Report; Pg 372 of 448]
Correction 595:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-El. 74.21 (5.81ft) called out on Sht C4.07.
[Storm Report; Pg 373 of 448]
Correction 596:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-2.25in called out on Sht C4.07.
[Storm Report; Pg 373 of 448]
Correction 597:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-12in called out on Sht C4.07.
[Storm Report; Pg 373 of 448]
Correction 598:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coordinate calculations to reflect the actual control risers being used with the individual RTank system for each subasin.
[Storm Report; Pg 373 of 448]
Correction 599:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-El. 100.00?
[Storm Report; Pg 373 of 448]
Correction 600:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-2.06 per Plans, Sht C4.07.
[Storm Report; Pg 373 of 448]
Correction 601:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-El. 68.30 (0.9ft) called out on Sht C4.07.
[Storm Report; Pg 373 of 448]
Correction 602:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-Orifice is not called out on plans, Sht C4.07.
[Storm Report; Pg 373 of 448]
Correction 603:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Please ADD BMPS C102, C107, C122, C150, C151, C152, C153, C209, and C241.
[Storm Report; Pg 380 of 448]
Correction 604:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE to reflect current WQ desgn approach.
[Storm Report; Pg 382 of 448]
Correction 605:
See Document Markup
Comments:
SEE comments in Section 2.1.
[Storm Report; Pg 382 of 448]
Correction 606:
See Document Markup
Comments:
SEE comments in Section 1.2.1.
[Storm Report; Pg 382 of 448]
Correction 607:
See Document Markup
Comments:
SEE comments in Section 2.2.
[Storm Report; Pg 383 of 448]
Correction 608:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Please add BMP C102.
[Storm Report; Pg 383 of 448]
Correction 609:
See Document Markup
Comments:
FYI-It is more than a mile to the Puyallup River along the project's release route which includes the Pioneer Way north ditch and main stem of Deer Creek.
[Storm Report; Pg 6 of 448]
Correction 610:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Please add BMP C107.
[Storm Report; Pg 384 of 448]
Correction 611:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add: "Baker Tank sizing calculations included in the CFG Permit PRGR20230972.
[Storm Report; Pg 384 of 448]
Correction 612:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add BMP C241 and state "sediment pond sizing calculations included in the CFG Permit PRGR20230972.
[Storm Report; Pg 384 of 448]
Correction 613:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Please add "and dust control".
[Storm Report; Pg 384 of 448]
Correction 614:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add BMPs C120, 121, 123, and C140.
[Storm Report; Pg 384 of 448]
Correction 615:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Please add BMP C209.
[Storm Report; Pg 385 of 448]
Correction 616:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add: "(if approved by the AHJ)".
[Storm Report; Pg 385 of 448]
Correction 617:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add: "(if approved by the AHJ)".
[Storm Report; Pg 385 of 448]
Correction 618:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Please add: "Clean dewatering water shall not be routed through stormwater sediment ponds."
[Storm Report; Pg 385 of 448]
Correction 619:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Please REVISE to "TBD".
[Storm Report; Pg 388 of 448]
Correction 620:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Please ADD BMPS C102, C107, C122, C150, C151, C152, C153, C209, and C241.
[Storm Report; Pg 389 of 448]
Correction 621:
See Document Markup
Comments:
List the Pollution Prevention Team, their title, and contact info for the project. For persons yet to be determined, use "TBD".
[Storm Report; Pg 390 of 448]
Correction 622:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide Monitoring and Sampling criteria...for reference, see Ecology's CSWPPP template.
[Storm Report; Pg 390 of 448]
Correction 623:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add Note-"Caution: Protect Existing Watermain During Construction".
[Storm Report; Pg 392 of 448]
Correction 624:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add Note-"Caution: Protect Existing Storm Main During Construction".
[Storm Report; Pg 392 of 448]
Correction 625:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Include filter sock detail also.
[CSWPPP; 393 of 448]
Correction 626:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Please ADD BMPS C102, C107, C122, C150, C151, C152, C153, C209, and C241.
[Storm Report; Pg 400 of 448]
Correction 627:
See Document Markup
Comments:
These conditions were for the design team's information on the previous review and do not have to be included on the civil plans. Up to the EoR discretion whether to remove or include on the planset.
[Plans Sht C0.0; Pg 1 of 63]
Correction 628:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-0420264021.
[Plans Sht C0.0; Pg 1 of 63]
Correction 629:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-0420264053.
[Plans Sht C0.0; Pg 1 of 63]
Correction 630:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-0420264054.
[Plans Sht C0.0; Pg 1 of 63]
Correction 631:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-Generator or Trash Enclosure?
[Plans Sht C0.0; Pg 1 of 63]
Correction 632:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CLARIFY-Trash Enclosure?
[Plans Sht C0.0; Pg 1 of 63]
Correction 633:
See Document Markup
Comments:
City Standards require a minimum 3ft of cover over CPEP pipe (ref. City Stds 204.4(3)). The City is willing to allow minimum cover of 30in, but staff cannot support a further reduction based on City regulations. If it is still desired to use CPEP with less than 30in of cover, a formal Alternative Methods Request (AMR) application must be submitted for review and formal decision by the City Engineer. Please be aware that cost savings cannot be a justification to deviate from City Standards.
[Plans Sht C0.0; Pg 1 of 63]
Correction 634:
See Document Markup
Comments:
ADD CFG application number-PRGR20230972.
[Plans Sht C1.0; Pg 2 of 63]
Correction 635:
See Document Markup
Comments:
ADD-CFG application number-PRGR20230972.
[Plans Sht C1.0; Pg 2 of 63]
Correction 636:
See Document Markup
Comments:
ADD Note-Portion of existing watermain to be rerouted.
[Plans Sht C1.0; Pg 2 of 63]
Correction 637:
See Document Markup
Comments:
OK to use detail...please remove title block info.
[Plans Sht C1.1; Pg 3 of 63]
Correction 638:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-drive aisle width with Fire Code Official.
[Plans Sht C2.1; Pg 4 of 63]
Correction 639:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-min. gate opening width serving trash and recycling is 25ft and min depth of enclosure is 12ft. See City Stds 208.1.
[Plans Sht C2.1; Pg 4 of 63]
Correction 640:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CLARIFY-generator area or trash enclosure? If trash enclosure, see City Stds 208.1 for enclosure req'ts.
[Plans Sht C2.1; Pg 4 of 63]
Correction 641:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout drive aisle width.
[Plans Sht C2.2; Pg 5 of 63]
Correction 642:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-min. gate opening width serving trash and recycling is 25ft. See City Stds 208.1(3).
[Plans Sht C2.2; Pg 5 of 63]
Correction 643:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-C2.1?
[Plans Sht C2.3; Pg 6 of 63]
Correction 644:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-C2.4?
[Plans Sht C2.3; Pg 6 of 63]
Correction 645:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout drive aisle width.
[Plans Sht C2.3; Pg 6 of 63]
Correction 646:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-drive aisle width with Fire Code Official.
[Plans Sht C2.3; Pg 6 of 63]
Correction 647:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-C2.2?
[Plans Sht C2.4; Pg 7 of 63]
Correction 648:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-C2.3?
[Plans Sht C2.4; Pg 7 of 63]
Correction 649:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add Note-"Walls over 4'-0" require separate building permit."
[Plans Sht C2.5; Pg 8 of 63]
Correction 650:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CLARIFY.
[Plans Sht C2.6; Pg 9 of 63]
Correction 651:
See Document Markup
Comments:
FYI-if this distance is less than 5ft (btwn landing and back of curb), then the DWS is req'd at the bottom of the ramp.
[Plans Sht C2.6; Pg 9 of 63]
Correction 652:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Delineate the regulated floodplain per the LOMR, Effective September 8, 2022.
[Plans Sht C3.1; Pg 10 of 63]
Correction 653:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT- Rim Elevation.
[Plans Sht C3.2; Pg 11 of 63]
Correction 654:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT- Rim Elevation.
[Plans Sht C3.2; Pg 11 of 63]
Correction 655:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Delineate the regulated floodplain per the LOMR, Effective September 8, 2022.
[Plans Sht C3.3; Pg 12 of 63]
Correction 656:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Delineate the regulated floodplain per the LOMR, Effective September 8, 2022.
[Plans Sht C3.4; Pg 13 of 63]
Correction 657:
See Document Markup
Comments:
RELOCATE-Phase line to top of pond.
[Plans Sht C3.4; Pg 13 of 63]
Correction 658:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-Existing storm pond serving properties to the south to be protected and remain in service until Phase 2.
[Plans Sht C3.4; Pg 13 of 63]
Correction 659:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-to protect existing storm drain serving properties to the south.
[Plans Sht C3.4; Pg 13 of 63]
Correction 660:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-Sheet callout (C4.07?).
[Plans Sht C4.01; Pg 14 of 63]
Correction 661:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Sht Ref C4.0X? (Typ).
Correction 662:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Delineate the regulated floodplain per the LOMR, Effective September 8, 2022.
[Plans Sht C4.01; Pg 14 of 63]
Correction 663:
See Document Markup
Comments:
ADD-WQ Rim and inlet elevation info.
[Plans Sht C4.01; Pg 14 of 63]
Correction 664:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-City Stds 204.3(4) requires min 12in dia pipe for mains. Revise accordingly.
[Plans Sht C4.01; Pg 14 of 63]
Correction 665:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-City Stds 204.3(4) requires min 12in dia pipe for mains. Revise accordingly.
[Plans Sht C4.01; Pg 14 of 63]
Correction 666:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-City Stds 204.3(4) requires min 12in dia pipe for mains. Revise accordingly.
[Plans Sht C4.01; Pg 14 of 63]
Correction 667:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-to 12" dia. per Stds 204.3(4) (south).
[Plans Sht C4.01; Pg 14 of 63]
Correction 668:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-to 12" dia. per Stds 204.3(4) (S & N).
[Plans Sht C4.01; Pg 14 of 63]
Correction 669:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-pipe info (size, mat'l, slope). Use ductile iron per City Stds 204.4.
[Plans Sht C4.01; Pg 14 of 63]
Correction 670:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-DI pipe due to shallow bury.
[Plans Sht C4.01; Pg 14 of 63]
Correction 671:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-to 12" dia. per Stds 204.3(4) (north).
[Plans Sht C4.01; Pg 14 of 63]
Correction 672:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-Profile 5/C4.06 (and 6/C4.06)?
[Plans Sht C4.01; Pg 14 of 63]
Correction 673:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-C4.07?
[Plans Sht C4.01; Pg 14 of 63]
Correction 674:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CLARIFY-generator area or trash enclosure? If trash enclosure, see City Stds 208.1 for enclosure req'ts.
[Plans Sht C2.1; Pg 4 of 63]
Correction 675:
See Document Markup
Comments:
City Standards require a minimum 3ft of cover over CPEP pipe (ref. City Stds 204.4(3)). The City is willing to allow minimum cover of 30in, but staff cannot support a further reduction based on City regulations. If it is still desired to use CPEP with less than 30in of cover, a formal Alternative Methods Request (AMR) application must be submitted for review and formal decision by the City Engineer. Please be aware that cost savings cannot be a justification to deviate from City Standards.
[Plans Sht C4.01; Pg 14 of 63]
Correction 676:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-Sheet callout (C4.07?).
[Plans Sht C4.02; Pg 15 of 63]
Correction 677:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide utility crossing information.
[Plans Sht C4.02; Pg 15 of 63]
Correction 678:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-C4.07?
[Plans Sht C4.02; Pg 15 of 63]
Correction 679:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-Solid locking lid for WQ purposes?
[Plans Sht C4.02; Pg 15 of 63]
Correction 680:
See Document Markup
Comments:
FYI-French Drain construction was removed from the CFG planset and pushed to the civil set.
[Plans Sht C4.02; Pg 15 of 63]
Correction 681:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-Rim and IE info.
[Plans Sht C4.02; Pg 15 of 63]
Correction 682:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-DI pipe due to shallow bury.
[Plans Sht C4.02; Pg 15 of 63]
Correction 683:
See Document Markup
Comments:
ADD-WQ5 Inlet info.
[Plans Sht C4.02; Pg 15 of 63]
Correction 684:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-pipe info (size, mat'l, slope).
[Plans Sht C4.02; Pg 15 of 63]
Correction 685:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-top elevations with Sht C4.21. (Also, see Control Riser comments, Sht C4.07).
[Plans Sht C4.02; Pg 15 of 63]
Correction 686:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-pipe slope w/ IEs.
[Plans Sht C4.02; Pg 15 of 63]
Correction 687:
See Document Markup
Comments:
ADD-WQ Rim and outlet elevation info.
[Plans Sht C4.02; Pg 15 of 63]
Correction 688:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-Profile 5/C4.06 (and 6/C4.06)?
[Plans Sht C4.02; Pg 15 of 63]
Correction 689:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-12" dia req'd.
[Plans Sht C4.02; Pg 15 of 63]
Correction 690:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Delineate the regulated floodplain per the LOMR, Effective September 8, 2022.
[Plans Sht C4.03; Pg 16 of 63]
Correction 691:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-Sheet callout (C4.07?).
[Plans Sht C4.03; Pg 16 of 63]
Correction 692:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-Pipe Info (Size, Mat'l, Slope).
[Plans Sht C4.03; Pg 16 of 63]
Correction 693:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-Pipe Info (Size, Mat'l, Slope).
[Plans Sht C4.03; Pg 16 of 63]
Correction 694:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CLARIFY-Phase 2 install?
[Plans Sht C4.03; Pg 16 of 63]
Correction 695:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CONFIRM-Material callout.
[Plans Sht C4.03; Pg 16 of 63]
Correction 696:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-to protect existing storm drain serving properties to the south.
[Plans Sht C4.03; Pg 16 of 63]
Correction 697:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide utility crossing information.
[Plans Sht C4.03; Pg 16 of 63]
Correction 698:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-Sheet callout (C4.07?).
[Plans Sht C4.04; Pg 17 of 63]
Correction 699:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-pipe size.
[Plans Sht C4.04; Pg 17 of 63]
Correction 700:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-pipe info (size and slope). Also, coordinate with Sht C4.31.
[Plans Sht C4.04; Pg 17 of 63]
Correction 701:
See Document Markup
Comments:
ADD-RTank 3 inlets #1, 3, and 4 with IEs.
[Plans Sht C4.04; Pg 17 of 63]
Correction 702:
See Document Markup
Comments:
ADD-SDCO#D1 structure details.
[Plans Sht C4.04; Pg 17 of 63]
Correction 703:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-DI pipe due to shallow bury.
[Plans Sht C4.04; Pg 17 of 63]
Correction 704:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-Existing storm pond serving properties to the south to be protected and remain in service until Phase 2.
[Plans Sht C4.04; Pg 17 of 63]
Correction 705:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-to protect existing storm drain serving properties to the south.
[Plans Sht C4.04; Pg 17 of 63]
Correction 706:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide utility crossing information.
[Plans Sht C4.04; Pg 17 of 63]
Correction 707:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Pipe to east?
[Plans Sht C4.05; Pg 18 of 63]
Correction 708:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CONFIRM-storm elev...if separation is less than 1ft (must be 6in min), then use ethafoam pad btwn the pipes.
[Plans Sht C4.05; Pg 18 of 63]
Correction 709:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-SDCB#40 info (type, rim and IE).
[Plans Sht C4.05; Pg 18 of 63]
Correction 710:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-DI pipe due to shallow bury.
[Plans Sht C4.05; Pg 18 of 63]
Correction 711:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-water crossing?
[Plans Sht C4.05; Pg 18 of 63]
Correction 712:
See Document Markup
Comments:
ADD-structure info.
[Plans Sht C4.05; Pg 18 of 63]
Correction 713:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Readability.
[Plans Sht C4.05; Pg 18 of 63]
Correction 714:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CONFIRM-storm elev.
[Plans Sht C4.05; Pg 18 of 63]
Correction 715:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show sewer and provide crossing info.
[Plans Sht C4.06; Pg 19 of 63]
Correction 716:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout IE (2 plcs).
[Plans Sht C4.06; Pg 19 of 63]
Correction 717:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Pipe to south?
[Plans Sht C4.06; Pg 19 of 63]
Correction 718:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Phase 2 Stub?
[Plans Sht C4.06; Pg 19 of 63]
Correction 719:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show existing storm main and provide crossing information.
[Plans Sht C4.06; Pg 19 of 63]
Correction 720:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per comments on C4.01, revise to 12" dia. per Stds 204.3(4) (north).
[Plans Sht C4.06; Pg 19 of 63]
Correction 721:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-fabric overlap reqts.
[Plans Sht C4.07; Pg 20 of 63]
Correction 722:
See Document Markup
Comments:
ADD-City Standard Details 02.01.05 // 02.01.09.
[Plans Sht C4.07; Pg 20 of 63]
Correction 723:
See Document Markup
Comments:
60in.
[Plans Sht C4.07; Pg 20 of 63]
Correction 724:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-1.5 per Storm Report, Pg 372 of 448.
[Plans Sht C4.07; Pg 20 of 63]
Correction 725:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-It appears to be El. 73.32 noted on Sht. C4.21 (5ft of live storage per calcs-which places riser top at El. 73.40). However, RTank 3 top of storage is El. 75.23. It appears that as RTank 3 fills, RTank 2 will go into overflow before RTank 3 storage is fully utilized. If riser top is intended to be El. 75.25, then RTank 2 appears to be in a surcharged condition.
[Plans Sht C4.07; Pg 20 of 63]
Correction 726:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-24in used in calcs per Storm Report, Pg 372 of 448.
[Plans Sht C4.07; Pg 20 of 63]
Correction 727:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-1.25 per Storm Report, Pg 372 of 448.
[Plans Sht C4.07; Pg 20 of 63]
Correction 728:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-18in used in calcs per Storm Report, Pg 373 of 448.
[Plans Sht C4.07; Pg 20 of 63]
Correction 729:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-It appears to be El. 70.88 noted on Sht. C4.11 (2ft of live storage per calcs-which places riser top at El 69.40). Also, there are a number of CB rims below this elevation.
[Plans Sht C4.07; Pg 20 of 63]
Correction 730:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-2.25 per Storm Report, Pg 373 of 448.
[Plans Sht C4.07; Pg 20 of 63]
Correction 731:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-1.25ft above IE per calcs in Storm Report, Pg 373 of 448.
[Plans Sht C4.07; Pg 20 of 63]
Correction 732:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY- calcs callout a 3rd orifice on the control riser per Storm Report, Pg 373 of 448.
[Plans Sht C4.07; Pg 20 of 63]
Correction 733:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CLARIFY-whether the optional drain down device will be implemented. (See GULD Para 3)
[Plans Sht C4.08; Pg 21 of 63]
Correction 734:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CONFIRM-IE w Sht C4.02.
[Plans Sht C4.08; Pg 21 of 63]
Correction 735:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CONFIRM-12in per Sht C4.02.
[Plans Sht C4.08; Pg 21 of 63]
Correction 736:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CONFIRM-12in per Sht C4.02.
[Plans Sht C4.08; Pg 21 of 63]
Correction 737:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Legibility.
[Plans Sht C4.08; Pg 21 of 63]
Correction 738:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CLARIFY-whether the optional drain down device will be implemented. (See GULD Para 3)
[Plans Sht C4.09; Pg 22 of 63]
Correction 739:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Legibility.
[Plans Sht C4.09; Pg 22 of 63]
Correction 740:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Legibility.
[Plans Sht C4.10; Pg 23 of 63]
Correction 741:
See Document Markup
Comments:
PROVIDE-2yr and 10yr water surface elevations on the cross section.
[Plans Sht C4.11; Pg 24 of 63]
Correction 742:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Legibility.
[Plans Sht C4.11; Pg 24 of 63]
Correction 743:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Legibility.
[Plans Sht C4.12; Pg 25 of 63]
Correction 744:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Legibility.
[Plans Sht C4.13; Pg 26 of 63]
Correction 745:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Legibility.
[Plans Sht C4.14; Pg 27 of 63]
Correction 746:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Legibility.
[Plans Sht C4.15; Pg 28 of 63]
Correction 747:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Legibility.
[Plans Sht C4.16; Pg 29 of 63]
Correction 748:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-manufactured 30mil (min) impermeable liner to prevent groundwater intrusion.
[Plans Sht C4.17; Pg 30 of 63]
Correction 749:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Legibility.
[Plans Sht C4.17; Pg 30 of 63]
Correction 750:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Legibility.
[Plans Sht C4.20; Pg 31 of 63]
Correction 751:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CLARIFY- See Control Structure comments on Sht C4.07, and riser comments in Storm Report, Pg 372 of 448.
[Plans Sht C4.21; Pg 32 of 63]
Correction 752:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CLARIFY- See storage volume required comments in Storm Report, Pg 372 of 448.
[Plans Sht C4.21; Pg 32 of 63]
Correction 753:
See Document Markup
Comments:
PROVIDE-2yr and 10yr water surface elevations on the cross section.
[Plans Sht C4.21; Pg 32 of 63]
Correction 754:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Legibility.
[Plans Sht C4.21; Pg 32 of 63]
Correction 755:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Legibility.
[Plans Sht C4.22; Pg 33 of 63]
Correction 756:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Legibility.
[Plans Sht C4.23; Pg 34 of 63]
Correction 757:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Legibility.
[Plans Sht C4.24; Pg 35 of 63]
Correction 758:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Legibility.
[Plans Sht C4.25; Pg 36 of 63]
Correction 759:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Legibility.
[Plans Sht C4.26; Pg 37 of 63]
Correction 760:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-manufactured 30mil (min) impermeable liner to prevent groundwater intrusion.
[Plans Sht C4.27; Pg 38 of 63]
Correction 761:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Legibility.
[Plans Sht C4.27; Pg 38 of 63]
Correction 762:
See Document Markup
Comments:
COORDINATE with Sht C4.03.
[Plans Sht C4.30; Pg 39 of 63]
Correction 763:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Legibility.
[Plans Sht C4.30; Pg 39 of 63]
Correction 764:
See Document Markup
Comments:
COORDINATE with Sht C4.04.
[Plans Sht C4.31; Pg 40 of 63]
Correction 765:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CLARIFY- See Control Structure comments on Sht C4.07, and riser comments in Storm Report, Pg 372 of 448.
[Plans Sht C4.31; Pg 40 of 63]
Correction 766:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CLARIFY- See storage volume required comments in Storm Report, Pg 372 of 448.
[Plans Sht C4.31; Pg 40 of 63]
Correction 767:
See Document Markup
Comments:
PROVIDE-2yr and 10yr water surface elevations on the cross section.
[Plans Sht C4.31; Pg 40 of 63]
Correction 768:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Legibility.
[Plans Sht C4.31; Pg 40 of 63]
Correction 769:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Legibility.
[Plans Sht C4.32; Pg 41 of 63]
Correction 770:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Legibility.
[Plans Sht C4.33; Pg 42 of 63]
Correction 771:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Legibility.
[Plans Sht C4.34; Pg 43 of 63]
Correction 772:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-manufactured 30mil (min) impermeable liner to prevent groundwater intrusion.
[Plans Sht C4.35; Pg 44 of 63]
Correction 773:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Legibility.
[Plans Sht C4.35; Pg 44 of 63]
Correction 774:
See Document Markup
Comments:
PROVIDE-grease interceptor sizing calculations (750 gal min) for both GIs.
[Plans Sht C5.01; Pg 45 of 63]
Correction 775:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Service lateral exceeds max. grade (8% max). Revise accordingly.
[Plans Sht C5.01; Pg 45 of 63]
Correction 776:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-exceeds max allowable slope (8%).
[Plans Sht C5.01; Pg 45 of 63]
Correction 777:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-drop manhole.
[Plans Sht C5.01; Pg 45 of 63]
Correction 778:
See Document Markup
Comments:
See comment on plan.
[Plans Sht C5.01; Pg 45 of 63]
Correction 779:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-min. 10ft of straight pipe on inlet side of GI (ref. City Stds 402.3(8).
[Plans Sht C5.01; Pg 45 of 63]
Correction 780:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-show tee on downstream side of GI (ref. City Stds 402.3(9).
[Plans Sht C5.01; Pg 45 of 63]
Correction 781:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-sampling connection per City Std Detail 04.03.04.
[Plans Sht C5.01; Pg 45 of 63]
Correction 782:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-sheet reference (C5.5?).
[Plans Sht C5.01; Pg 45 of 63]
Correction 783:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout?
[Plans Sht C5.01; Pg 45 of 63]
Correction 784:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-cleanout and IE.
[Plans Sht C5.01; Pg 45 of 63]
Correction 785:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-min. 10ft separation btwn sewer and foundation(s).
[Plans Sht C5.01; Pg 45 of 63]
Correction 786:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-sampling connection per City Std Detail 04.03.04.
[Plans Sht C5.01; Pg 45 of 63]
Correction 787:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-sheet reference (C5.5?).
[Plans Sht C5.01; Pg 45 of 63]
Correction 788:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-PVC per record drawings. (Permit E21-0426).
[Plans Sht C5.01; Pg 45 of 63]
Correction 789:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-DI per record drawings. (Permit E21-0426).
[Plans Sht C5.01; Pg 45 of 63]
Correction 790:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-cleanout and IE.
[Plans Sht C5.01; Pg 45 of 63]
Correction 791:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-show tee on downstream side of GI (ref. City Stds 402.3(9).
[Plans Sht C5.01; Pg 45 of 63]
Correction 792:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-min. 10ft separation btwn sewer and foundation(s).
[Plans Sht C5.01; Pg 45 of 63]
Correction 793:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-DI pipe due to shallow bury.
[Plans Sht C5.01; Pg 45 of 63]
Correction 794:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-DI pipe due to shallow bury.
[Plans Sht C5.01; Pg 45 of 63]
Correction 795:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-Record Dwgs indicate this connection as a simple tie-in to an existing stub...no structure.
[Plans Sht C5.01; Pg 45 of 63]
Correction 796:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide utility crossing information.
[Plans Sht C5.02; Pg 46 of 63]
Correction 797:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Service lateral exceeds max. grade (8% max). Revise accordingly.
[Plans Sht C5.02; Pg 46 of 63]
Correction 798:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-structure type and grate.
[Plans Sht C5.02; Pg 46 of 63]
Correction 799:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-side sewer IE.
[Plans Sht C5.02; Pg 46 of 63]
Correction 800:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-pipe info (size, mat'l, slope).
[Plans Sht C5.02; Pg 46 of 63]
Correction 801:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout?
[Plans Sht C5.02; Pg 46 of 63]
Correction 802:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Readability.
[Plans Sht C5.02; Pg 46 of 63]
Correction 803:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-PVC per record drawings. (Permit E21-0426).
[Plans Sht C5.02; Pg 46 of 63]
Correction 804:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-sampling connection per City Std Detail 04.03.04.
[Plans Sht C5.02; Pg 46 of 63]
Correction 805:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-sampling connection per City Std Detail 04.03.04.
[Plans Sht C5.02; Pg 46 of 63]
Correction 806:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide utility crossing information.
[Plans Sht C5.03; Pg 47 of 63]
Correction 807:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Service lateral exceeds max. grade (8% max). Revise accordingly.
[Plans Sht C5.03; Pg 47 of 63]
Correction 808:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-sampling connection per City Std Detail 04.03.04.
[Plans Sht C5.03; Pg 47 of 63]
Correction 809:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-sampling connection per City Std Detail 04.03.04.
[Plans Sht C5.03; Pg 47 of 63]
Correction 810:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-sampling connection per City Std Detail 04.03.04.
[Plans Sht C5.03; Pg 47 of 63]
Correction 811:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide utility crossing information.
[Plans Sht C5.04; Pg 48 of 63]
Correction 812:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Service lateral exceeds max. grade (8% max). Revise accordingly.
[Plans Sht C5.04; Pg 48 of 63]
Correction 813:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-sampling connection per City Std Detail 04.03.04.
[Plans Sht C5.04; Pg 48 of 63]
Correction 814:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-sampling connection per City Std Detail 04.03.04.
[Plans Sht C5.04; Pg 48 of 63]
Correction 815:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout?
[Plans Sht C5.04; Pg 48 of 63]
Correction 816:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout?
[Plans Sht C5.04; Pg 48 of 63]
Correction 817:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-sampling connection per City Std Detail 04.03.04.
[Plans Sht C5.04; Pg 48 of 63]
Correction 818:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-sampling connection per City Std Detail 04.03.04.
[Plans Sht C5.04; Pg 48 of 63]
Correction 819:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-sampling connection per City Std Detail 04.03.04.
[Plans Sht C5.04; Pg 48 of 63]
Correction 820:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-sampling connection per City Std Detail 04.03.04.
[Plans Sht C5.04; Pg 48 of 63]
Correction 821:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-per comment Sht C5.02.
[Plans Sht C5.05; Pg 49 of 63]
Correction 822:
See Document Markup
Comments:
PROVIDE-utility crossing info.
[Plans Sht C5.05; Pg 49 of 63]
Correction 823:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-drop manhole per City Std Detail 04.01.02.
[Plans Sht C5.05; Pg 49 of 63]
Correction 824:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-per comment Sht C5.01.
[Plans Sht C5.05; Pg 49 of 63]
Correction 825:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-pipe run with Sht C5.03.
[Plans Sht C5.06; Pg 50 of 63]
Correction 826:
See Document Markup
Comments:
PROVIDE-utility crossing info (exist'g SD and new sewer).
[Plans Sht C5.06; Pg 50 of 63]
Correction 827:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-per comment Sht C5.02.
[Plans Sht C5.06; Pg 50 of 63]
Correction 828:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-pipe length with Sht C5.04.
[Plans Sht C5.06; Pg 50 of 63]
Correction 829:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-per comment Sht C5.02.
[Plans Sht C5.06; Pg 50 of 63]
Correction 830:
See Document Markup
Comments:
PROVIDE-utility crossing info.
[Plans Sht C5.07; Pg 51 of 63]
Correction 831:
See Document Markup
Comments:
ADD-City Std Detail 04.03.04 // 04.06.02
[Plans Sht C5.5; Pg 52 of 63]
Correction 832:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-sheet callout (C5.08?).
[Plans Sht C5.5; Pg 52 of 63]
Correction 833:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-sheet callout (C6.08?). (4 plcs)
[Plans Sht C6.01; Pg 53 of 63]
Correction 834:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-sheet callout (C6.09?). (5 plcs)
[Plans Sht C6.01; Pg 53 of 63]
Correction 835:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-sheet callout (C6.10?). (3 plcs)
[Plans Sht C6.01; Pg 53 of 63]
Correction 836:
See Document Markup
Comments:
ADD NOTE: Wet taps to existing water mains shall be accomplished through a tapping tee and tapping valve and shall be made by a city approved contractor. The tapping sleeve shall be Romac SST all stainless steel tapping sleeve or approved equal. A two-piece epoxy coated or ductile iron tapping sleeve may be used on ductile iron pipe, when the tap is smaller than the water main size i.e. 6-inch tap on 8-inch pipe. The City shall approve the time and location for these connections.
[Plans Sht C6.01; Pg 53 of 63]
Correction 837:
See Document Markup
Comments:
ADD NOTE: If the project is utilizing a fire booster pump, the FDC must connect to the sprinkler system on the discharge side of the pump in accordance with NFPA regulations.).
[Plans Sht C6.01; Pg 53 of 63]
Correction 838:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-and show thrust block.
[Plans Sht C6.01; Pg 53 of 63]
Correction 839:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-Sheet Ref (C6.03).
[Plans Sht C6.01; Pg 53 of 63]
Correction 840:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-and show thrust block.
[Plans Sht C6.01; Pg 53 of 63]
Correction 841:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-8x8 wet tap.
[Plans Sht C6.01; Pg 53 of 63]
Correction 842:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-8in GV.
[Plans Sht C6.01; Pg 53 of 63]
Correction 843:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-Sheet Ref (C6.02).
[Plans Sht C6.01; Pg 53 of 63]
Correction 844:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-PIV and DDCVA.
[Plans Sht C6.01; Pg 53 of 63]
Correction 845:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-sheet reference (C6.10?).
[Plans Sht C6.01; Pg 53 of 63]
Correction 846:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-and show 2in GV.
[Plans Sht C6.01; Pg 53 of 63]
Correction 847:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-callout 2" per City Std Detail 03.03.02.
[Plans Sht C6.01; Pg 53 of 63]
Correction 848:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-sheet reference (C6.10?).
[Plans Sht C6.01; Pg 53 of 63]
Correction 849:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-callout 1" per City Std Detail 03.03.01.
[Plans Sht C6.01; Pg 53 of 63]
Correction 850:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-PIV and DDCVA.
[Plans Sht C6.01; Pg 53 of 63]
Correction 851:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-Sheet Ref (C6.04).
[Plans Sht C6.02; Pg 54 of 63]
Correction 852:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-and show 8in GV.
[Plans Sht C6.02; Pg 54 of 63]
Correction 853:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-and show 2in GV.
[Plans Sht C6.02; Pg 54 of 63]
Correction 854:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-and show DCVA backflow device.
[Plans Sht C6.02; Pg 54 of 63]
Correction 855:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-callout 2" per City Std Detail 03.03.02.
[Plans Sht C6.02; Pg 54 of 63]
Correction 856:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-and show 6in GV and thrust block.
[Plans Sht C6.02; Pg 54 of 63]
Correction 857:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-PIV and DDCVA.
[Plans Sht C6.02; Pg 54 of 63]
Correction 858:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-and show 8in GV and thrust block.
[Plans Sht C6.02; Pg 54 of 63]
Correction 859:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-PIV and DDCVA.
[Plans Sht C6.02; Pg 54 of 63]
Correction 860:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-fitting and thrust block.
[Plans Sht C6.02; Pg 54 of 63]
Correction 861:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-Sheet Ref (C6.01).
[Plans Sht C6.02; Pg 54 of 63]
Correction 862:
See Document Markup
Comments:
ADD NOTE: Wet taps to existing water mains shall be accomplished through a tapping tee and tapping valve and shall be made by a city approved contractor. The tapping sleeve shall be Romac SST all stainless steel tapping sleeve or approved equal. A two-piece epoxy coated or ductile iron tapping sleeve may be used on ductile iron pipe, when the tap is smaller than the water main size i.e. 6-inch tap on 8-inch pipe. The City shall approve the time and location for these connections.
[Plans Sht C6.02; Pg 54 of 63]
Correction 863:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-and show thrust block.
[Plans Sht C6.02; Pg 54 of 63]
Correction 864:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-and show 8in GV and thrust block.
[Plans Sht C6.02; Pg 54 of 63]
Correction 865:
See Document Markup
Comments:
See comments Sht C6.01.
[Plans Sht C6.02; Pg 54 of 63]
Correction 866:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-and show 2in GV.
[Plans Sht C6.02; Pg 54 of 63]
Correction 867:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-callout 2" per City Std Detail 03.03.02.
[Plans Sht C6.02; Pg 54 of 63]
Correction 868:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-and show 6in GV.
[Plans Sht C6.02; Pg 54 of 63]
Correction 869:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-and show 6in GV.
[Plans Sht C6.02; Pg 54 of 63]
Correction 870:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-callout 2" per City Std Detail 03.03.02.
[Plans Sht C6.02; Pg 54 of 63]
Correction 871:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-and show DCVA backflow device.
[Plans Sht C6.02; Pg 54 of 63]
Correction 872:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-PIV and DDCVA.
[Plans Sht C6.02; Pg 54 of 63]
Correction 873:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-PIV and DDCVA.
[Plans Sht C6.02; Pg 54 of 63]
Correction 874:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-and show 2in GV.
[Plans Sht C6.02; Pg 54 of 63]
Correction 875:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-to abandon rerouted existing watermain.
[Plans Sht C6.02; Pg 54 of 63]
Correction 876:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-sheet reference (C6.06?).
[Plans Sht C6.02; Pg 54 of 63]
Correction 877:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-and show DCVA backflow device.
[Plans Sht C6.02; Pg 54 of 63]
Correction 878:
See Document Markup
Comments:
See comments Sht C6.01.
[Plans Sht C6.03; Pg 55 of 63]
Correction 879:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-callout 2" per City Std Detail 03.03.02.
[Plans Sht C6.03; Pg 55 of 63]
Correction 880:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-use blowoff assembly.
[Plans Sht C6.03; Pg 55 of 63]
Correction 881:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-and show DCVA backflow device.
[Plans Sht C6.03; Pg 55 of 63]
Correction 882:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-and show DCVA backflow device.
[Plans Sht C6.03; Pg 55 of 63]
Correction 883:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-Sheet Ref (C6.01).
[Plans Sht C6.03; Pg 55 of 63]
Correction 884:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-Sheet Ref (C6.04).
[Plans Sht C6.03; Pg 55 of 63]
Correction 885:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CONFIRM-hydrant run with the hydraulic model (max run 20ft w/o modeling).
[Plans Sht C6.03; Pg 55 of 63]
Correction 886:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-and show thrust block.
[Plans Sht C6.03; Pg 55 of 63]
Correction 887:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-and show 2in GV.
[Plans Sht C6.03; Pg 55 of 63]
Correction 888:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-and show 2in GV.
[Plans Sht C6.03; Pg 55 of 63]
Correction 889:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-callout 2" per City Std Detail 03.03.02.
[Plans Sht C6.03; Pg 55 of 63]
Correction 890:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-Sheet Ref (C6.03).
[Plans Sht C6.04; Pg 56 of 63]
Correction 891:
See Document Markup
Comments:
See comments Sht C6.01.
[Plans Sht C6.04; Pg 56 of 63]
Correction 892:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-and show thrust block.
[Plans Sht C6.02; Pg 54 of 63]
Correction 893:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-Sheet Ref (C6.02).
[Plans Sht C6.04; Pg 56 of 63]
Correction 894:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-and show DCVA backflow device.
[Plans Sht C6.04; Pg 56 of 63]
Correction 895:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-callout 2" per City Std Detail 03.03.02.
[Plans Sht C6.04; Pg 56 of 63]
Correction 896:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-and show 2in GV.
[Plans Sht C6.04; Pg 56 of 63]
Correction 897:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-callout 2" per City Std Detail 03.03.02.
[Plans Sht C6.04; Pg 56 of 63]
Correction 898:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-and show DCVA backflow device.
[Plans Sht C6.04; Pg 56 of 63]
Correction 899:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-PIV and DDCVA.
[Plans Sht C6.04; Pg 56 of 63]
Correction 900:
See Document Markup
Comments:
ADD-ethafoam detail to plan set.
[Plans Sht C6.01; Pg 53 of 63]
Correction 901:
See Document Markup
Comments:
ADD NOTE-"See Ethafoam Detail and City Std Detail 03.01.03-1 & 2 for utility crossing req'ts.".
[Plans Sht C6.05; Pg 57 of 63]
Correction 902:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-8in GV.
[Plans Sht C6.05; Pg 57 of 63]
Correction 903:
See Document Markup
Comments:
If utility crossings are less than 12in, provide Etha Foam sheet per attached detail.
[Plans Sht C6.05; Pg 57 of 63]
Correction 904:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-water pipe conflicts with storm pipe.
[Plans Sht C6.05; Pg 57 of 63]
Correction 905:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-relocate watermain to provide a min. of 6" clear and install ethafoam per detail. In an effort to avoid the req'ts of Std Detail 03.01.03-1 & 2, it may be in the best interest of the project to relocate the existing watermain to provide adequate separation.
[Plans Sht C6.05; Pg 57 of 63]
Correction 906:
See Document Markup
Comments:
If utility crossings are less than 12in, provide Etha Foam sheet per attached detail.
[Plans Sht C6.05; Pg 57 of 63]
Correction 907:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-callout 2" per City Std Detail 03.03.02.
[Plans Sht C6.05; Pg 57 of 63]
Correction 908:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-callout 1" per City Std Detail 03.03.01.
[Plans Sht C6.01; Pg 53 of 63]
Correction 909:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-callout 2" per City Std Detail 03.03.02.
[Plans Sht C6.06; Pg 58 of 63]
Correction 910:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CALLOUT-6in GV.
[Plans Sht C6.06; Pg 58 of 63]
Correction 911:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-callout 2" per City Std Detail 03.03.02.
[Plans Sht C6.06; Pg 58 of 63]
Correction 912:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-per Sht C6.02 comment.
[Plans Sht C6.06; Pg 58 of 63]
Correction 913:
See Document Markup
Comments:
ADD NOTE-"See Ethafoam Detail and City Std Detail 03.01.03-1 & 2 for utility crossing req'ts.".
[Plans Sht C6.06; Pg 58 of 63]
Correction 914:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-use blowoff assembly.
[Plans Sht C6.06; Pg 58 of 63]
Correction 915:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-callout 2" per City Std Detail 03.03.02.
[Plans Sht C6.06; Pg 58 of 63]
Correction 916:
See Document Markup
Comments:
ADD Note-"See City Std Detail 03.01.03-1 & 2 for crossing criteria."
[Plans Sht C6.06; Pg 58 of 63]
Correction 917:
See Document Markup
Comments:
If utility crossings are less than 12in, provide Etha Foam sheet per attached detail Sht C6.05.
[Plans Sht C6.06; Pg 58 of 63]
Correction 918:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-8x8 wet tap per City Stds 301.1(3).
[Plans Sht C6.06; Pg 58 of 63]
Correction 919:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-8in GV.
[Plans Sht C6.06; Pg 58 of 63]
Correction 920:
See Document Markup
Comments:
ADD Note-"See City Std Detail 03.01.03-1 & 2 for crossing criteria."
[Plans Sht C6.06; Pg 58 of 63]
Correction 921:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-relocate watermain to provide a min. of 6" clear and install ethafoam per detail. In an effort to avoid the req'ts of Std Detail 03.01.03-1 & 2, it may be in the best interest of the project to relocate the existing watermain to provide adequate separation.
[Plans Sht C6.07; Pg 59 of 63]
Correction 922:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-callout 2" per City Std Detail 03.03.02.
[Plans Sht C6.07; Pg 59 of 63]
Correction 923:
See Document Markup
Comments:
ADD NOTE-"See Ethafoam Detail and City Std Detail 03.01.03-1 & 2 for utility crossing req'ts.".
[Plans Sht C6.07; Pg 59 of 63]
Correction 924:
See Document Markup
Comments:
NOTE to ENGR-although Ethafoam was suggested during last review, is AHBL confident that a 24in storm pipe flowing full will not negatively affect the watermain when there is only 6in of separation? In an effort to avoid the req'ts of Std Detail 03.01.03-1 & 2, it may be in the best interest of the project to lower the existing watermain.
[Plans Sht C6.07; Pg 59 of 63]
Correction 925:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-8x8 wet tap.
[Plans Sht C6.07; Pg 59 of 63]
Correction 926:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-callout 2" per City Std Detail 03.03.02.
[Plans Sht C6.07; Pg 59 of 63]
Correction 927:
See Document Markup
Comments:
REVISE-water pipe conflicts with storm pipe.
[Plans Sht C6.07; Pg 59 of 63]
Correction 928:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-water elevation callout.
[Plans Sht C6.07; Pg 59 of 63]
Correction 929:
See Document Markup
Comments:
VERIFY-if 3" water service(s) are anticipated, include City Std Detail 03.03.03 to the planset.
[Plans Sht C6.08; Pg 60 of 63]
Correction 930:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Combine with thrust block details on Sht C6.08.
[Plans Sht C6.09; Pg 61 of 63]
Correction 931:
See Document Markup
Comments:
ADD-City Std Details 03.04.01 // 03.04.03 (if 3" water service(s) are anticipated) // 03.06.01 // 03.11.01.
[Plans Sht C6.10; Pg 62 of 63]
Correction 932:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Please submit the signal planset with the separate and forthcoming Offsite civil application.
[Signal Plans Sht PM-01; Pg 1 of 9]
Correction 933:
See Document Markup
Comments:
City Standards require a minimum 3ft of cover over CPEP pipe (ref. City Stds 204.4(3)). The City is willing to allow minimum cover of 30in, but staff cannot support a further reduction based on City regulations. If it is still desired to use CPEP with less than 30in of cover, a formal Alternative Methods Request (AMR) application must be submitted for review and formal decision by the City Engineer. Please be aware that cost savings cannot be a justification to deviate from City Standards.
[ADS Technical Sheet, Burial Depth of Corrugated HDPE Pipe]
Correction 934:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Revise landscape design to ensure there are no trees within 10ft of underground wet utilities and fire hydrants.
[Landscape Plans Sht L1.0; Pg 1 of 10]
Public Works Streets Review
Failed
01/02/2024
01/17/2024
Reviewer:
Corrections:
Correction 1:
Comment
Comments:
Public Works Streets Review
VOID
09/05/2023
01/11/2024
Reviewer:
Engineering Traffic Review
Failed
01/02/2024
01/09/2024
Reviewer:
Corrections:
Correction 1:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
Upcoming (separate) civil submittal for frontage improvements must address all conditions listed below. Design must clearly address/acknowledge all these requirements within civil submittal:
Occupancy for any building will not be granted until complete frontage improvements are fully constructed (Shaw Rd & E Pioneer frontages). This includes any roadway widening, City standard streetlighting, striping, signalization, signage, curb/gutter/sidewalk, reduced speed school zone, stormwater infrastructure, etc. Per in-person meetings with the applicant, phase 1 is not designed or intended to function as a standalone project (construction phasing only).
The Shaw Rd driveway/signal shall not be used as a construction entrance. This entrance can only be used once the traffic signal is fully operational and the site is fully constructed. During construction only, it’s possible the City may require the E Pioneer construction entrance to be restricted to right-in/right-out.
Trip generation estimates must be updated to reflect updated commercial/retail space. Current scoping/TIA does not match building sizes/types shown in current site plan.
The City will require more information regarding the E Pioneer curb alignment. Current design does not align with the Pioneer Crossing offset. The City needs more information + detailed exhibits showing why this design change has not been implemented.
During civil design, a detailed sight distance analysis will be required at the E Pioneer driveway per City Standards. ESD of 415ft is required at this driveway. Assume 14.5ft setback from the E Pioneer curb alignment and 3.5ft driver eye height. It appears there’s a pedestrian barricade and a fence that will obstruct sight distance here.
During Civil review, the channelization plan for E Pioneer needs to provide the following information:
1. Applicant will need to verify there’s adequate ROW to accommodate paved offsite taper.
2. Applicant to verify paved transition will provide adequate utility pole clearance from the travel lane.
Alignment of creek along the E Pioneer frontage must not interfere with frontage improvements.
Traffic Impact fees (TIF) will be assessed in accordance with fees adopted by ordinance, per PMC 21.10.
Impact fees are subject to change and are adopted by ordinance. The applicant shall pay the proportionate impact fees adopted at the time of building permit application
Park impact fees shall be charged per new dwelling unit based on its size. Fees are assessed in accordance with fees adopted by ordinance, per PMC 21.10
School impact fees shall be paid directly to the school district in accordance with adopted fee at the time of collection by the District.
Per Puyallup Municipal Code Section 11.08.130, the applicant/owner would be expected to construct half-street improvements including curb, gutter, planter strip, sidewalk, roadway base, pavement, and street lighting. Any existing improvements which are damaged now or during construction, or which do not meet current City Standards, shall be replaced. Based on the materials submitted, the applicant would be expected to construct half-street improvements on the following streets:
a. E Pioneer is designated as a major arterial roadway, consisting of curb, gutter, 10’ planter strips, 8’ sidewalks, and City standard streetlights every 150ft.
b. The east leg of the Shaw/Pioneer intersection was designed to accommodate 5 lanes of traffic (56ft throat) to align with the existing channelization on west side of Shaw Rd. The curb line along the south side of E Pioneer frontage shall continue this alignment heading East (approximately 34ft from centerline). This will require roadway widening to accommodate this alignment.
c. Sidewalks and planter strips will not be required east the E Pioneer driveway. However, ROW dedication will be required to facilitate future improvements.
d. A TWLTL is required along the E Pioneer frontage (minimum 75ft on either side of driveway).
e. Paved transitions off-site will be required for safety reasons.
f. Shaw Rd is designated as a major arterial. Per our comprehensive plan, this section of Shaw Rd shall be constructed with a shared use path along the entire length of frontage. The dimensions and materials shall match the existing Shaw Rd shared use path constructed between 23rd Ave SE & Manorwood Dr.
g. As part of these improvements, additional right-of-way (ROW) may need to be dedicated to the City.
During civil review, City staff shall review street tree placement, monument signage, fences, etc. to ensure required sight distance requirements are met.
Site access driveways shall meet our minimum commercial driveway requirements (35ft curb radius, 30ft width). This is could change based on design vehicles used for the AutoTurn.
Site access restrictions:
a. No SBL movement at traffic signal
b. E Pioneer Driveway
Driveway can remain full access as shown with the following conditions:
1. Driveway spacing from Shaw Rd remains as shown on the current site plan
2. TWLTL extending 75ft on either side of driveway (within E Pioneer)
3. Entering sight distance standards are met to allow outbound left turns.
4. At the City's full discretion, outbound left turns from the proposed E Pioneer driveway can be restricted in the future. The following statement will be placed on the face of the short plat:
a. “At the discretion of the City, the City may restrict outbound left turns from the E Pioneer access in the future. At the request of the City, the Owners, Heirs, Successors and Assigns agree to renovate and/or improve the driveway access in accordance with the City of Puyallup Municipal Code and Engineering Standards.”
At the time of civil permit review provide a separate street lighting plan and pavement striping plan (channelization) sheet for the City to review.
a. Street lighting plan:
i. City standard streetlights are required every 150ft along E Pioneer frontage.
ii. E Pioneer (Arterial) will require GE EVOLVE ELR2 Fixtures ERL2-3-23-A3-40-D-Gray-A-V1 (City to provide latest part numbers)
iii. The existing service cabinet at the E Pioneer/Shaw Rd traffic signal has capacity to power the E Pioneer streetlights.
iv. City would allow new streetlights to be installed on the north side of E Pioneer to avoid overhead utility conflicts.
v. If the applicant choses to install streetlights on the south side of E Pioneer, it is the sole responsibility of the design engineer to ensure streetlight design/placement is outside of the 10ft minimum “safe zone” area. The City will not allow streetlights to be within 10ft of the PSE primary for safety reasons.
vi. Streetlights shall have shorting caps installed with remote photocell located on the service cabinet.
vii. The existing PSE utility pole mounted streetlight does not meet current City standards and will be removed with installation of City standard streetlights.
viii. Streetlight design shall provide the following:
1. Provide details on how streetlights will be powered
2. Location of conduit runs
3. Wiring Schedule
a. Conduit size and type for each raceway
b. Conductors details
4. Pole schedule
a. STA & offset for each luminaire
5. Show location of junction boxes
b. Channelization + signage plan:
i. Shaw Rd/E Pioneer traffic signal may require striping and signage modifications based on the design of the E Pioneer frontage/driveway.
ii. The new Shaw Rd traffic signal will also require striping and signage modifications.
iii. Pavement markings approaching traffic signal shall be thermoplastic
Traffic signal modifications
a. The Shaw Rd access intersection (signal) will require modifications to accommodate the proposed driveway. The applicant will coordinate with the City’s Adaptive Signal Contractor to purchase/install/configure proprietary equipment.
b. Signal designer will implement modifications to the westbound and eastbound approach:
i. Signal heads + phases
ii. Flashing yellow arrows
iii. Left turn phases
iv. Striping/channelization modifications - Channelization shall match the assumptions outlined in the TIA. The EB approach (leaving Safeway) will need to be restriped to accommodate the updated channelization.
c. The applicant will install a new crosswalk at this signal to accommodate pedestrians crossing Shaw Rd. At this location, only one crosswalk will be allowed to cross Shaw Rd.
d. Crosswalk will be installed on the south leg of the intersections (see additional requirements below).
e. The required signal/intersection modifications must be fully configured and operational no less than 2 weeks prior to receiving occupancy for any building on-site. Adaptive signal contractor (Rhythm Engineering) will be required to configure the adaptive system on-site. Adaptive contractor will provide setup/configuration/optimization (not completed by the City).
f. there’s an existing overhead fiber run that will need to be spliced/connected with the cabinet. These design elements and conditions must be on the plans.
g. At the SE corner of the new Shaw Rd access location, adequate ROW must be dedicated, or an easement granted for signal maintenance purposes.
Based on comments received from the school district, this site will not receive bus service for students attending Shaw Rd Elementary. These students will be expected to walk. Based on the increase volume of elementary age students walking to Shaw Rd Elementary. The City will require the following modifications:
a. At the new traffic signal, an electronic blank-out sign shall be mounted on the eastbound signal pole that restricts eastbound right turns when pedestrians are using the crossing
b. Internal pedestrian paths will need to accommodate safe routing to the traffic signal.
c. Reduced Speed School Zone along Shaw Rd has been requested by the School District. The City has determined a reduced speed school zone is feasible/warranted for Shaw Rd Elementary (to be installed by the East Town Crossing development). School zone flashers designed/installed with this project that meets current WAC and MUTCD requirements. Coordinate with the City for required hardware & wireless interconnect.
d. Coordinate with the City of Puyallup and the Puyallup School District for the preferred off-site bus stop locations
Civil plan set shall provide a detailed channelization plan for all striping & pavement markings in within ROW. All proposed striping shall meet City and MUTCD requirements. Plan shall include signage located in ROW. All City standard details related to pavement markings, striping, sign placement must be provided.
Correction 2:
See Document Markup
Comments:
A SBL turn pocket will not be allowed at this intersection. This has been communicated to the design team on multiple occasions and is a condition of the preliminary site plan approval.
[Signal TS-01; Sht 1 of 5]
Correction 3:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Include complete signal design with upcoming (separate) civil submittal for frontage improvements along Shaw Rd and E Pioneer. The City's review of proposed signal improvements will occur when complete frontage design is submitted. Please reference preliminary site plan approval conditions for design requirements.
Correspondence sent 6/8/23
Please make sure the signal designer reviews the conditions related to the signal design, streetlights, & school zone flashers (see below) prior to working on the civil design. This intersection will require coordination with our adaptive contractor for setup/configuration/optimization (not completed by the City). The EB approach (leaving Safeway) will need to be restriped to accommodate the updated channelization. Pedestrian enhancements will also be required (electronic blank out sign) to restrict right turns when pedestrians are in the crosswalk. Additionally, there will need to be reduced speed school zone flashers designed/installed with this project that meets current WAC and MUTCD requirements. Also, there’s an existing overhead fiber run that will need to be spliced/connected with the cabinet. These design elements and conditions must be on the plans.
[Signal TS-01 Sht 1 of 5]
Correction 4:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Construction access not allowed on Shaw Rd. Provide note that specifically restricts access.
[Plans C-2; Pg 2 of 45]
Correction 5:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Access not allowed @ Shaw Rd until Signal/Intersection are fully constructed and operational. Additionally, the E Pioneer access/frontage must be fully constructed per City standards prior to allowing public access @ Shaw Rd (current access proposal on E Pioneer is for construction only). Provide note on plans.
Per conditions of preliminary site plan approval:
The required signal/intersection modifications must be fully configured and operational no less than 2 weeks prior to receiving occupancy for any building on-site. Adaptive signal contractor (Rhythm Engineering) will be required to configure the adaptive system on-site.
[Plans C-3; Pg 3 of 45]
Correction 6:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Label this access for construction only (not suitable for public access). Per conditions of the preliminary site plan approval, occupancy for any building will not be granted until complete frontage improvements are fully constructed (Shaw Rd & E Pioneer frontages). This includes any roadway widening, City standard streetlighting, striping, signalization, signage, curb/gutter/sidewalk, reduced speed school zone, stormwater infrastructure, etc. Per in-person meetings with the applicant, phase 1 is not designed or intended to function as a standalone project (construction phasing only).
[Plans C-5; Pg 5 of 45]
Correction 7:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide clarification on why a fire turnaround is proposed. Will this be an interim/temporary condition during construction? Per in-person meetings with the applicant, phase 1 (this submittal) is not designed or intended to function as a standalone project (construction phasing only). It's my understanding the completion of phase 2 will not require a fire turnaround here (dual ROW access points + thru internal circulation provided). Building occupancy will not be granted until phase 2 frontage/access improvements are completed per PSP conditions.
[Plans C-6; Pg 6 of 45]
Correction 8:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
Per previous comment, include complete signal design with upcoming (separate) civil submittal for frontage improvements along Shaw Rd and E Pioneer. The City's review of proposed signal improvements will occur when complete frontage design is submitted with phase 2 (do not include signal improvements with current phase 1 submittal). Preliminary signal design submitted with phase 1 has not been reviewed. Please reference conditions for design requirements.
Correction 9:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Include note that specifically restricts construction access from Shaw Rd.
[Plans C1.1; Pg 3 of 63]
Correction 10:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Signal work will be completed under phase 2. No access via Shaw Rd for phase 1. Provide note on plans. See conditions for more details.
[Plans C2.1; Pg 4 of 63]
Correction 11:
See Document Markup
Comments:
The City's review of proposed signal improvements will occur when complete frontage design is submitted with phase 2 (do not include signal improvements with current phase 1 submittal)
[PM-01]
Planning Review
Failed
01/02/2024
01/08/2024
Reviewer:
Corrections:
Correction 1:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Plans scale at 1:20 [sheet C3, planning comment]
Correction 2:
See Document Markup
Comments:
See final conditions on 052423 Planning marked up site plan. All these improvements need to be removed from 50 foot buffer area. [sheet C3, planning comment]
Correction 3:
See Document Markup
Comments:
All landscape islands required to be 8 feet wide min. w silva cells. Correct throughout. [sheet C3, planning comment]
Correction 4:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Will this require a switch back for ADA accessibility from ROW? [sheet C3, planning comment]
Correction 5:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Code requires a berm or a landscape wall to screen drive thru. Since the site is elevated, will a wall be provided along the drive aisle in lieu? [sheet C3, planning comment]
Correction 6:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide 1 walk way path through this landscape strip, per Type IV landscape design standard requirements [sheet C3, planning comment]
Correction 7:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide 2 walk way paths through this landscape strip, per Type IV landscape design standard requirements [sheet C3, planning comment]
Correction 8:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide 6 foot wide landscape strip, per Type IV landscape design standard requirements [sheet C3, planning comment]
Correction 9:
See Document Markup
Comments:
parking stall depth can be reduced to 15 feet to transfer dimension to required 6 ft landscape strip [sheet C3, planning comment]
Correction 10:
See Document Markup
Comments:
parking stall depth can be reduced to 15 feet to transfer dimension to required 6 ft landscape strip [sheet C3, planning comment]
Correction 11:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Move walking pathway interior to landscape buffer along drive aisle per conditions on 052423 planning final approved site plan [sheet C3, planning comment]
Correction 12:
See Document Markup
Comments:
show limits of clearing consistent with 50 foot stream buffer protection, associated CFG permit [sheet C3, planning comment]
Correction 13:
See Document Markup
Comments:
show limits of clearing consistent with 50 foot stream buffer protection, associated CFG permit [sheet C3, planning comment]
Correction 14:
See Document Markup
Comments:
PSP approval was conditioned that the end two or three parking stalls on each side of this small parking lot needed to be eliminated to protect stream buffer (stalls still shown) [sheet C3, planning comment]
Correction 15:
See Document Markup
Comments:
All landscape islands required to be 8 foot planting bed area interior to curbing. Shown at 7 feet. Silva cells required throughout. Correct throughout plan design. [sheet C4, planning comment]
Correction 16:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Landscape yard shown at 10 feet, required to be 12 feet wide. Short adjacent parking stall depth and transfer dimension to landscape yard fronting Shaw Road [sheet C4, planning comment]
Correction 17:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add raised crosswalk here as this provides access to play area and mail for units to the east. Raised crossing will slow speeds and provide ped priority for this crossing. [sheet C4, planning comment]
Correction 18:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Located in stream buffer. Area will need to be vegetated with native plants over this structure. [sheet C7, planning comment]
Correction 19:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Placement of SS line cannot interfere with street trees on this section, ensure 10 foot off set spacing from street trees on landscape plan. [sheet C11, planning comment]
Correction 20:
See Document Markup
Comments:
All landscape islands required to contain trees. These SS lines throughout this plan sheet are run directly under each island and must be off set located. Correct throughout. [sheet C12, planning comment]
Correction 21:
See Document Markup
Comments:
All landscape islands required to contain trees. Cannot locate SSMH in island. [sheet C12, planning comment]
Correction 22:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Run water line under walk way in this area to avoid conflict with trees. See previous comment to locate sidewalk interior of drive aisle and place row of trees between drive aisle and walkway. [sheet C14, planning comment]
Correction 23:
See Document Markup
Comments:
All landscape islands required to contain trees. Water lines throughout this plan sheet are run directly under each island and must be off set located. Correct throughout. [sheet C14, planning comment]
Correction 24:
See Document Markup
Comments:
All landscape islands required to contain trees. Water infrastructure needs to be relocated to avoid conflict here. [sheet C16, planning comment]
Correction 25:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Same comment about infrastructure under landscape islands. Correct throughout. [sheet C17, planning comment]
Correction 26:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify enough soil cover over this vault to allow required landscaping to occur. [sheet C28, planning comment]
Correction 27:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Site frontage must contain type II, 12 feet of layered shrubs and ground cover in a berm. Grass cannot be located in first 12 feet of landscape yard. See VMS type IIc standard. [landscape comment, sheet L1.1]
Correction 28:
See Document Markup
Comments:
All interior side yards need to contain intermix of flowering natives, some of which is provided but additional plants are required. See VMS type III standard [landscape comment, sheet L1.1]
Correction 29:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add additional street tree here along frontage of bldg H. [landscape comment, sheet L1.1]
Correction 30:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add additional row of street trees here. This landscape yard must be 12 feet, see civil plan comments. [landscape comment, sheet L1.1]
Correction 31:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add additional row of street trees interior to the walk way along drive asile. This walk way must be interior of a landscape strip, also see civil plan comments. [landscape comment, sheet L1.1]
Correction 32:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Cannot zero out landscaping here. What is this? an access door to the garbage area/enclosure? [landscape comment, sheet L1.1]
Correction 33:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Planning commented on location of utilities and conflict with parking lot landscape islands on full civil plan set. Landscape architect to coordinate with civil design to show all water, sanitary, storm and other underground utilities on each quadrant plan set sheet, ensuring proper separation is provided [landscape comment, sheet L1.0]
Correction 34:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Any area in a stream buffer must be restore/re-vegetated with native plants only. [landscape comment, sheet L1.3]
Correction 35:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add 50 foot stream buffer to this plan sheet , from OHWM [landscape comment, sheet L1.3]
Correction 36:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Final conditioned land use permit eliminated parking stalls and moved improvements out of 50 foot buffer area. Coordinate with civil design to correct. [landscape comment, sheet L1.3]
Correction 37:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show city standard sight distance triangle area on both sides of drive way [landscape comment, sheet L1.4]
Correction 38:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Move walk way interior to drive aisle, move landscape to edge of curb line, add trees. Must use a medium sized tree for area, such as a european hornbeam, zelkova, Frontier elm, gingko, or similar species here [landscape comment, sheet L1.4]
Correction 39:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Planter strip must be 6 feet wide, contain trees. See type IV design standards, VMS. Same comment on civil design plan [landscape comment, sheet L1.4]
Correction 40:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Some islands not correctly sized (8 feet required width). See type IV design standards, VMS. Same comment on civil design plan [landscape comment, sheet L1.4]
Correction 41:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Acer rubrum on prohibited street tree list, pick another large canopy tree from approved list in VMS. Also provide intermix of species consistent with VMS section 12.6 [landscape comment, sheet L1.4]
Correction 42:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Final conditioned land use permit eliminated parking stalls and moved improvements out of 50 foot buffer area. Coordinate with civil design to correct. [landscape comment, sheet L1.4]
Correction 43:
See Document Markup
Comments:
This plaza space shall include amenities such as bike parking, bench seating, planters, fountains, artwork, decorative railing, decorative light fixtures, hanging baskets or other features that are pedestrian scaled in nature on street frontages, per code. Please show pedestrian scale improvements on plan sheets. [landscape comment, sheet L1.4]
Correction 44:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide low growing native shrubs and daffodils in these cut outs along curb line [landscape comment, sheet L1.4]
Correction 45:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Space street trees on frontage of site (immediately back of walk) at 25-30 feet on center. Appear to be 40 feet or more as shown. [landscape comment, sheet L1.4]
Correction 46:
See Document Markup
Comments:
All landscaping islands and connector strips shall be designed using either
evergreen and deciduous shrub masses spacing at tight on-center intervals (designed to provide 90 percent coverage in 3 years) that will prevent foot traffic and associated soil compaction into these landscaping areas. Appears to need additional plants to provide coverage requirements. [landscape comment, sheet L1.4]
Correction 47:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Walking pathway cutting through each connector strip is required. Same comment on civil design plan [landscape comment, sheet L1.4]
Correction 48:
See Document Markup
Comments:
The following comment applies throughout the plan set, where applicable. Please show a cross hatch for site frontages and grouped throughout the site landscape plan set. Section 7.4 from the VMS: ??? ?????????
The Puyallup area has a long history with daffodil bulb agricultural cultivation. To reflect that cultural heritage, daffodils shall be used in all perimeter yard areas. All perimeter landscape ???? ????? ???????? ?? ??? ? ??? ????? ??????? ????????? ??????? ????? ??????? ??†?????? ??????? ?? ??? ????? ?? ?? ????????? ????? ?????? ??? ???????? ????? ??????? ?? ?? ?????????? ????? ????????? ?? ????????? ????? ?? ???? ?? ????????? ??????? ????????? ??????
A. Daffodil Bulbs may be interspersed throughout the perimeter landscape areas with standard landscaping shrubs/ground cover/trees, as required. ?? ????? ????????? ?? ????????? ??????? ??? ?? ????? ???? ??? ?????????? ?? ????? ??????? ??†?????? ??????? ?? ??? ???????? ????? ??????? ?? ??? ???????? ???? ??? ?????????? ???? ???
right of way. ?? ???????? ???? ???????? ????? ?? ????????? ?? ??????????? ???? ?? ???? ?? ????? ????????????? ??????????†? ?????????? ?????????? ??? ?? ???????? ?? ???? ?? ?????????? ?? ?????? ??? ???????????? ?? ??? ??????????? ???? ?? ????? ??????? ????????? ????????? ??? ???? ?? ??????????? ???? ?? ???? ?? ?????? ???? ?? ?????? ??? ?????? ?? ???? ????? ????????
Correction 49:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide low growing native shrubs and daffodils in these cut outs along curb line [landscape comment, sheet L1.4]
Correction 50:
See Document Markup
Comments:
7.3 Native plant materials A minimum of 50 percent of the shrubs and ground covers used in projects under the requirements of the PMC and the VMS shall be native to the Puget Sound region. Drought tolerant non-PNW Native species, such as xeriscape plants, may be used as a substitute to native plant requirements to create landscapes adaptable to climate change and localized heat island
issues that may not allow PNW native species to successfully establish. PNW native species shall
be used in all cases as a first priority; the project landscape architect must detail why xeriscape
species of plants would be used as a supplement or substitute. [landscape comment, sheet L1.5]
Correction 51:
Miscellaneous Planning Correction
Comments:
Is the November 30, 2022 stream corridor revegetation plan (drawn by 'Nature by Design', KOwens) the current plan set for the mitigation plan? Please include those plan sheets with the landscape sheets. Will the mitigation plan be updated as a result of the USACE review and approval process?
Correction 52:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
SEPA mitigation measures require implementation of a requirement for off-site safe routes to schools improvements. See P-21-0034 SEPA (June 27, 2023). Please provide those plans for further review and agency consultation.
Fire Review
Failed
01/02/2024
01/04/2024
Reviewer:
Corrections:
Correction 1:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
1. The water plans are different then what was originally drawn on preliminary site plan. Apply previous notes to Civils. Email on 2/7/23 from Phil Becker acknowledging these requirements and provided a site plan with new layout.
2. Do not block Fire Hydrants, or F.D.C's with parking stalls. Move all blocked Fire Hydrants, and F.D.C's into parking islands.
3. All F.D.C's are required to be within 10-15' of a Fire Hydrant.
4. Provide fire turn-around dimensions and radiuses.
5. Provide all fire lane widths and radiuses. All fire lanes are required to be 26' wide.
6. Provide auto-turn analysis.
7. Provide Riser Room locations with direct access to side walk.
8. Provide Fire Lane / No Parking Sign layout with painted curbs. Temporary Fire Truck turn-around will require No Parking Signs and painted curb.
Correction 2:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
1. Provide all fire lane widths and radiuses. All fire lanes are required to be 26' wide. Temporary access on Pioneer will be required to be a 26' width. Future BLD E does not have a width called out. BLD T.I. requires a 26' fire lane in front. Building G, and H do not have a fire lane width call out on the North side.
2. Confirm that all storm vaults in the fire lanes are rated for 75,000lb load minimum load limit per the 2018 IFC.
3. Place all F.D.C's and Fire Hydrants closer to fire lanes in all parking islands. Fire Hydrants are placed to close to the parking stall and require a 36" clear space around them. F.D.C's, Fire Hydrants, and P.I.V's should be set back a minimum of 3' behind all curbs to avoid vehicle impact. If this can not be accomplished, vehicle impact protection "bollards" will be required.
4. Provide temporary fire truck turn-around dimensions per the 2018 IFC.
5. Provide Riser Room locations with direct access to side walk.
6. I do not see this addressed? This is required to have its own sheet, with the size of this project all curbs that are not parking stalls will be required to be painted yellow with white stenciled NO PARKING FIRE LANE. FIRE LANE / NO PARKING signs are required to be set behind curb at 50' intervals. (PMC 16.04.015 Emergency vehicle parking) Provide Fire Lane / No Parking Sign layout with painted curbs. Temporary Fire Truck turn-around will require No Parking Signs and painted curb. Remove all other non fire related items off the page.
Public Works Water Review
Failed
01/02/2024
12/27/2023
Reviewer:
Corrections:
Correction 1:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil C-14: For pages C-14, C-15, C-16, C-17: Make corrections to all Development Engineering comments on these pages.
Correction 2:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil C-14: For pages C-14, C-15, C-16, C-17: Many of the proposed fire hydrant runs are located off dead-end 8-inch water mains, which reduces the available fire flow. Pay to have a hydraulic model of the proposed water layout, to see if the available fire flow will meet the building requirements.
Correction 3:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil C-14: For pages C-14, C-15: The existing 8-inch water main that runs through this project also supplies water to the property to the south, which requires the water main to be public. Since this existing water main will be running through proposed parking areas, the City will allow a one-time exception from our 40-foot utility easement requirement, and allow the water main to be placed in the middle of a 20-foot easement.
Correction 4:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil C-14: For pages C-14, C-15, C-16, C-17: All water infrastructure for this project outside the proposed public utility easement shall be private, and the property owners responsibility to repair and maintain. This includes all parts of each water service (i.e. connection taps, service line, meter setters, meter boxes, etc.), the only exception would be the water meters and radio transmission equipment (MXU) which would be owned by the City, but paid for and installed by the contractor.
Correction 5:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil C-14: For pages C-14, C-15, C-16, C-17: Do not block fire hydrants or FDC's with parking stalls. Move all blocked fire hydrants and FDC's into parking islands.
Correction 6:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil C-14: For pages C-14, C-15, C-16, C-17: If the buildings are housing just apartments, a DCVA will be sufficient back flow protection. If the buildings contain both commercial space and apartments, upgrade the protection to an above ground RPBA.
Correction 7:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil C-14: This line feeding a fire hydrant on C-16 is too long for a hydrant run, and will need to be 8-inch.
Correction 8:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil C-16: Install 8" MJ x 6" Fl tee, 6" GV, and hydrant off end of 8-inch run.
Correction 9:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil C-16: Install 8" MJ x 6" Fl tee, 6" GV, and hydrant off end of 8-inch run.
Correction 10:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil C-17: For flushing purposes install 8" MJ x 6" Fl tee, 6" GV, and hydrant off end of 8-inch run. Tee for building fire line should be placed before hydrant run.
Correction 11:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Landscape L1.0: No tree within 10-feet of water mains, hydrants, FDC's, PIV's, meters, and back flow protection. Provide 3-foot planting clear zone around hydrants, FDC's, PIV's, meters, and back flow protection.
Correction 12:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Landscape L1.0: No irrigation plan is shown. Show irrigation service, size of meter, protected by same size DCVA on Landscape and Civil plans.
Correction 13:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.01: The existing 8-inch water main through this project will be public and all other water lines will be private. Show and call out the public water easement on this plan set.
Correction 14:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.01: This tee will be an 8-inch by 8-inch wet tap with a stainless steel tapping sleeve and an 8-inch gate valve. Not 8-inch by 6-inch as called out.
Correction 15:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.01: Call out PIV.
Correction 16:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.01: Follow City standards. Call out 2-inch PE with 2-inch gate valves shown on plan set.
Correction 17:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.01: 1.5-inch meter requires 1.5-inch RPBA not 1-inch.
Correction 18:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.01: 1-inch PE for 1-inch water service.
Correction 19:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.01: The hydrant tee should be called out as 8-inch by 8-inch by 6-inch Fl tee. An 8-inch Fl by MJ adapter to the east. An 8-inch by 6-inch Fl reducer to the west. A 6-inch gate valve Fl by MJ west of reducer. Call out PIV by fire vault.
Correction 20:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.01: Fire flow will be reduced by not looping in the dead-end 8-inch water main runs.
Correction 21:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.02: The existing 8-inch water main through this project will be public and all other water lines will be private. Show and call out the public water easement for this plan set.
Correction 22:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.02: No line valves are called out on the public water main through this project. If any work needs to be done on this public main, all water to this complex will be off until work is completed. At a minimum, consider installing three 8-inch gate valves at this tee for better control. One 8-inch gate valve is required on the east side of this tee.
Correction 23:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.02: Call out and show a 6-inch gate valve at this tee.
Correction 24:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.02: Call out PIV.
Correction 25:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.02: Install an 8-inch by 6-inch reducer on south side of tee, with a 6-inch gate valve.
Correction 26:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.02: Call out and show an 8-inch gate valve at south side of tee.
Correction 27:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.02: Call out PIV.
Correction 28:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.02: Call out and show 2-inch gate valve at water main tap.
Correction 29:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.02: No backflow protection is shown for this water service.
Correction 30:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.02: Call out 2-inch PE, not 3-inch PE.
Correction 31:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.02: Call out 8-inch stainless steel tapping sleeve with gate valve. Show valve.
Correction 32:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.02: Call out and show 2-inch gate valve at water main tap. Call out 2-inch PE not 3-inch PE. No backflow protection is shown for this water service.
Correction 33:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.02: Call out PIV.
Correction 34:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.02: Call out and show 6-inch gate valve at tee.
Correction 35:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.02: Call out and show 6-inch gate valve at tee.
Correction 36:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.02: Call out PIV.
Correction 37:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.02: Call out and show 2-inch gate valve at water main tap. Call out 2-inch PE not 3-inch PE. No backflow protection is shown for this water service.
Correction 38:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.02: Fire flow will be reduced by not looping in the dead-end 8-inch water main run. If the water main is not looped, install an 8-inch MJ plug on the west side of the hydrant tee with a thrust block. No 8-inch gate valve needed.
Correction 39:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.02: Fire flow will be reduced by not looping in the dead-end 8-inch water main run. If the water main is not looped, install an 8-inch MJ plug on the west side of the hydrant tee with a thrust block. No 8-inch gate valve needed. Show the 6-inch gate valve for the hydrant. A fire hydrant run should be 20-feet or less in length. Move hydrant back in parking bump-out.
Correction 40:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.02: Show 8-inch gate valve at tee.
Correction 41:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.03: Call out and show 2-inch gate valve at water main tap. Call out 2-inch PE not 3-inch PE. No backflow protection is shown for this water service.
Correction 42:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.03: Call out and show 2-inch gate valve at water main tap. Call out 2-inch PE not 3-inch PE. No backflow protection is shown for this water service.
Correction 43:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.03: Do not install 8-inch gate valve until the phase 2 tie-in. Install a 2-inch blow-off assembly per City Standard detail 03.06.01.
Correction 44:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.04: Call out and show 2-inch gate valves at water main taps. Call out 2-inch PE not 3-inch PE. No backflow protection is shown for these water services.
Correction 45:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.04: When phase 2 is installed the 8-inch water main will be looped for better fire flow. Install an 8-inch by 6-inch fire hydrant tee west of the fire line tee to provide better future fire flow for the hydrant. The fire line tee can now be 8-inch by 6-inch with a 6-inch gate valve. The 8-inch gate valve to the east will be installed at the phase 2 tie-in. For now install an 8-inch MJ plug in the east end of the fire line tee with thrust blocking.
Correction 46:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.04: Call out PIV.
Correction 47:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.07: In a perfect world it would be great to keep our water main at 36-inches of cover. To eliminate trapped air high points, it would be best to run the relocated 8-inch water main under the 12-inch storm line at STA 51+00. Run the 8-inch relatively flat and transition with 45-degree bends to the low tie-in.
Correction 48:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.09: Move the standard detail to Sheet C6.08.
Correction 49:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.09: Remove this Standard detail and replace with 03.06.01 2-inch blow-off assembly.
Correction 50:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil Resub Sheet C6.10: Remove this unneeded Standard detail.
Public Works Collection Review
Approved
01/02/2024
12/18/2023
Reviewer:
Planning Review
Failed
09/05/2023
08/30/2023
Reviewer:
Corrections:
Correction 1:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Plans scale at 1:20 [sheet C3, planning comment]
Correction 2:
See Document Markup
Comments:
See final conditions on 052423 Planning marked up site plan. All these improvements need to be removed from 50 foot buffer area. [sheet C3, planning comment]
Correction 3:
See Document Markup
Comments:
All landscape islands required to be 8 feet wide min. w silva cells. Correct throughout. [sheet C3, planning comment]
Correction 4:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Will this require a switch back for ADA accessibility from ROW? [sheet C3, planning comment]
Correction 5:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Code requires a berm or a landscape wall to screen drive thru. Since the site is elevated, will a wall be provided along the drive aisle in lieu? [sheet C3, planning comment]
Correction 6:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide 1 walk way path through this landscape strip, per Type IV landscape design standard requirements [sheet C3, planning comment]
Correction 7:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide 2 walk way paths through this landscape strip, per Type IV landscape design standard requirements [sheet C3, planning comment]
Correction 8:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide 6 foot wide landscape strip, per Type IV landscape design standard requirements [sheet C3, planning comment]
Correction 9:
See Document Markup
Comments:
parking stall depth can be reduced to 15 feet to transfer dimension to required 6 ft landscape strip [sheet C3, planning comment]
Correction 10:
See Document Markup
Comments:
parking stall depth can be reduced to 15 feet to transfer dimension to required 6 ft landscape strip [sheet C3, planning comment]
Correction 11:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Move walking pathway interior to landscape buffer along drive aisle per conditions on 052423 planning final approved site plan [sheet C3, planning comment]
Correction 12:
See Document Markup
Comments:
show limits of clearing consistent with 50 foot stream buffer protection, associated CFG permit [sheet C3, planning comment]
Correction 13:
See Document Markup
Comments:
show limits of clearing consistent with 50 foot stream buffer protection, associated CFG permit [sheet C3, planning comment]
Correction 14:
See Document Markup
Comments:
PSP approval was conditioned that the end two or three parking stalls on each side of this small parking lot needed to be eliminated to protect stream buffer (stalls still shown) [sheet C3, planning comment]
Correction 15:
See Document Markup
Comments:
All landscape islands required to be 8 foot planting bed area interior to curbing. Shown at 7 feet. Silva cells required throughout. Correct throughout plan design. [sheet C4, planning comment]
Correction 16:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Landscape yard shown at 10 feet, required to be 12 feet wide. Short adjacent parking stall depth and transfer dimension to landscape yard fronting Shaw Road [sheet C4, planning comment]
Correction 17:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add raised crosswalk here as this provides access to play area and mail for units to the east. Raised crossing will slow speeds and provide ped priority for this crossing. [sheet C4, planning comment]
Correction 18:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Located in stream buffer. Area will need to be vegetated with native plants over this structure. [sheet C7, planning comment]
Correction 19:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Placement of SS line cannot interfere with street trees on this section, ensure 10 foot off set spacing from street trees on landscape plan. [sheet C11, planning comment]
Correction 20:
See Document Markup
Comments:
All landscape islands required to contain trees. These SS lines throughout this plan sheet are run directly under each island and must be off set located. Correct throughout. [sheet C12, planning comment]
Correction 21:
See Document Markup
Comments:
All landscape islands required to contain trees. Cannot locate SSMH in island. [sheet C12, planning comment]
Correction 22:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Run water line under walk way in this area to avoid conflict with trees. See previous comment to locate sidewalk interior of drive aisle and place row of trees between drive aisle and walkway. [sheet C14, planning comment]
Correction 23:
See Document Markup
Comments:
All landscape islands required to contain trees. Water lines throughout this plan sheet are run directly under each island and must be off set located. Correct throughout. [sheet C14, planning comment]
Correction 24:
See Document Markup
Comments:
All landscape islands required to contain trees. Water infrastructure needs to be relocated to avoid conflict here. [sheet C16, planning comment]
Correction 25:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Same comment about infrastructure under landscape islands. Correct throughout. [sheet C17, planning comment]
Correction 26:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify enough soil cover over this vault to allow required landscaping to occur. [sheet C28, planning comment]
Correction 27:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Site frontage must contain type II, 12 feet of layered shrubs and ground cover in a berm. Grass cannot be located in first 12 feet of landscape yard. See VMS type IIc standard. [landscape comment, sheet L1.1]
Correction 28:
See Document Markup
Comments:
All interior side yards need to contain intermix of flowering natives, some of which is provided but additional plants are required. See VMS type III standard [landscape comment, sheet L1.1]
Correction 29:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add additional street tree here along frontage of bldg H. [landscape comment, sheet L1.1]
Correction 30:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add additional row of street trees here. This landscape yard must be 12 feet, see civil plan comments. [landscape comment, sheet L1.1]
Correction 31:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add additional row of street trees interior to the walk way along drive asile. This walk way must be interior of a landscape strip, also see civil plan comments. [landscape comment, sheet L1.1]
Correction 32:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Cannot zero out landscaping here. What is this? an access door to the garbage area/enclosure? [landscape comment, sheet L1.1]
Correction 33:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Planning commented on location of utilities and conflict with parking lot landscape islands on full civil plan set. Landscape architect to coordinate with civil design to show all water, sanitary, storm and other underground utilities on each quadrant plan set sheet, ensuring proper separation is provided [landscape comment, sheet L1.0]
Correction 34:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Any area in a stream buffer must be restore/re-vegetated with native plants only. [landscape comment, sheet L1.3]
Correction 35:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add 50 foot stream buffer to this plan sheet , from OHWM [landscape comment, sheet L1.3]
Correction 36:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Final conditioned land use permit eliminated parking stalls and moved improvements out of 50 foot buffer area. Coordinate with civil design to correct. [landscape comment, sheet L1.3]
Correction 37:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show city standard sight distance triangle area on both sides of drive way [landscape comment, sheet L1.4]
Correction 38:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Move walk way interior to drive aisle, move landscape to edge of curb line, add trees. Must use a medium sized tree for area, such as a european hornbeam, zelkova, Frontier elm, gingko, or similar species here [landscape comment, sheet L1.4]
Correction 39:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Planter strip must be 6 feet wide, contain trees. See type IV design standards, VMS. Same comment on civil design plan [landscape comment, sheet L1.4]
Correction 40:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Some islands not correctly sized (8 feet required width). See type IV design standards, VMS. Same comment on civil design plan [landscape comment, sheet L1.4]
Correction 41:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Acer rubrum on prohibited street tree list, pick another large canopy tree from approved list in VMS. Also provide intermix of species consistent with VMS section 12.6 [landscape comment, sheet L1.4]
Correction 42:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Final conditioned land use permit eliminated parking stalls and moved improvements out of 50 foot buffer area. Coordinate with civil design to correct. [landscape comment, sheet L1.4]
Correction 43:
See Document Markup
Comments:
This plaza space shall include amenities such as bike parking, bench seating, planters, fountains, artwork, decorative railing, decorative light fixtures, hanging baskets or other features that are pedestrian scaled in nature on street frontages, per code. Please show pedestrian scale improvements on plan sheets. [landscape comment, sheet L1.4]
Correction 44:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide low growing native shrubs and daffodils in these cut outs along curb line [landscape comment, sheet L1.4]
Correction 45:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Space street trees on frontage of site (immediately back of walk) at 25-30 feet on center. Appear to be 40 feet or more as shown. [landscape comment, sheet L1.4]
Correction 46:
See Document Markup
Comments:
All landscaping islands and connector strips shall be designed using either
evergreen and deciduous shrub masses spacing at tight on-center intervals (designed to provide 90 percent coverage in 3 years) that will prevent foot traffic and associated soil compaction into these landscaping areas. Appears to need additional plants to provide coverage requirements. [landscape comment, sheet L1.4]
Correction 47:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Walking pathway cutting through each connector strip is required. Same comment on civil design plan [landscape comment, sheet L1.4]
Correction 48:
See Document Markup
Comments:
The following comment applies throughout the plan set, where applicable. Please show a cross hatch for site frontages and grouped throughout the site landscape plan set. Section 7.4 from the VMS:
7.4 Daffodils
The Puyallup area has a long history with daffodil bulb agricultural cultivation. To reflect that cultural heritage, daffodils shall be used in all perimeter yard areas. All perimeter landscape
yard areas required by PMC 20.58 shall include Narcissus trumpet 'King Alfred' or ‘Dutch Master’ in the first 3’ of landscape areas behind the property line, planted at 6” on-center. Other groupings of Narcissus shall be used in groupings through landscape areas.
A. Daffodil Bulbs may be interspersed throughout the perimeter landscape areas with standard landscaping shrubs/ground cover/trees, as required.
B. Other varieties of Narcissus trumpet may be used, with the preference of 'King Alfred' or ‘Dutch Master’ in the frontage areas closest to any property line for visibility from the
right of way.
C. Daffodil bulb planting shall be completed at appropriate time of year to allow establishment (September – November). Applicants may be required to post an assignment to secure the installation at the appropriate time of year. Project landscape architect may spec an alternative time of year to plant, such as during the winter or very early spring.
Correction 49:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide low growing native shrubs and daffodils in these cut outs along curb line [landscape comment, sheet L1.4]
Correction 50:
See Document Markup
Comments:
7.3 Native plant materials A minimum of 50 percent of the shrubs and ground covers used in projects under the requirements of the PMC and the VMS shall be native to the Puget Sound region. Drought tolerant non-PNW Native species, such as xeriscape plants, may be used as a substitute to native plant requirements to create landscapes adaptable to climate change and localized heat island
issues that may not allow PNW native species to successfully establish. PNW native species shall
be used in all cases as a first priority; the project landscape architect must detail why xeriscape
species of plants would be used as a supplement or substitute. [landscape comment, sheet L1.5]
Public Works Collection Review
Approved
09/05/2023
08/24/2023
Reviewer:
Engineering Traffic Review
Failed
09/05/2023
08/16/2023
Reviewer:
Corrections:
Correction 1:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
Upcoming (separate) civil submittal for frontage improvements must address all conditions listed below. Design must clearly address/acknowledge all these requirements within civil submittal:
Occupancy for any building will not be granted until complete frontage improvements are fully constructed (Shaw Rd & E Pioneer frontages). This includes any roadway widening, City standard streetlighting, striping, signalization, signage, curb/gutter/sidewalk, reduced speed school zone, stormwater infrastructure, etc. Per in-person meetings with the applicant, phase 1 is not designed or intended to function as a standalone project (construction phasing only).
The Shaw Rd driveway/signal shall not be used as a construction entrance. This entrance can only be used once the traffic signal is fully operational and the site is fully constructed. During construction only, it’s possible the City may require the E Pioneer construction entrance to be restricted to right-in/right-out.
Trip generation estimates must be updated to reflect updated commercial/retail space. Current scoping/TIA does not match building sizes/types shown in current site plan.
The City will require more information regarding the E Pioneer curb alignment. Current design does not align with the Pioneer Crossing offset. The City needs more information + detailed exhibits showing why this design change has not been implemented.
During civil design, a detailed sight distance analysis will be required at the E Pioneer driveway per City Standards. ESD of 415ft is required at this driveway. Assume 14.5ft setback from the E Pioneer curb alignment and 3.5ft driver eye height. It appears there’s a pedestrian barricade and a fence that will obstruct sight distance here.
During Civil review, the channelization plan for E Pioneer needs to provide the following information:
1. Applicant will need to verify there’s adequate ROW to accommodate paved offsite taper.
2. Applicant to verify paved transition will provide adequate utility pole clearance from the travel lane.
Alignment of creek along the E Pioneer frontage must not interfere with frontage improvements.
Traffic Impact fees (TIF) will be assessed in accordance with fees adopted by ordinance, per PMC 21.10.
Impact fees are subject to change and are adopted by ordinance. The applicant shall pay the proportionate impact fees adopted at the time of building permit application
Park impact fees shall be charged per new dwelling unit based on its size. Fees are assessed in accordance with fees adopted by ordinance, per PMC 21.10
School impact fees shall be paid directly to the school district in accordance with adopted fee at the time of collection by the District.
Per Puyallup Municipal Code Section 11.08.130, the applicant/owner would be expected to construct half-street improvements including curb, gutter, planter strip, sidewalk, roadway base, pavement, and street lighting. Any existing improvements which are damaged now or during construction, or which do not meet current City Standards, shall be replaced. Based on the materials submitted, the applicant would be expected to construct half-street improvements on the following streets:
a. E Pioneer is designated as a major arterial roadway, consisting of curb, gutter, 10’ planter strips, 8’ sidewalks, and City standard streetlights every 150ft.
b. The east leg of the Shaw/Pioneer intersection was designed to accommodate 5 lanes of traffic (56ft throat) to align with the existing channelization on west side of Shaw Rd. The curb line along the south side of E Pioneer frontage shall continue this alignment heading East (approximately 34ft from centerline). This will require roadway widening to accommodate this alignment.
c. Sidewalks and planter strips will not be required east the E Pioneer driveway. However, ROW dedication will be required to facilitate future improvements.
d. A TWLTL is required along the E Pioneer frontage (minimum 75ft on either side of driveway).
e. Paved transitions off-site will be required for safety reasons.
f. Shaw Rd is designated as a major arterial. Per our comprehensive plan, this section of Shaw Rd shall be constructed with a shared use path along the entire length of frontage. The dimensions and materials shall match the existing Shaw Rd shared use path constructed between 23rd Ave SE & Manorwood Dr.
g. As part of these improvements, additional right-of-way (ROW) may need to be dedicated to the City.
During civil review, City staff shall review street tree placement, monument signage, fences, etc. to ensure required sight distance requirements are met.
Site access driveways shall meet our minimum commercial driveway requirements (35ft curb radius, 30ft width). This is could change based on design vehicles used for the AutoTurn.
Site access restrictions:
a. No SBL movement at traffic signal
b. E Pioneer Driveway
Driveway can remain full access as shown with the following conditions:
1. Driveway spacing from Shaw Rd remains as shown on the current site plan
2. TWLTL extending 75ft on either side of driveway (within E Pioneer)
3. Entering sight distance standards are met to allow outbound left turns.
4. At the City's full discretion, outbound left turns from the proposed E Pioneer driveway can be restricted in the future. The following statement will be placed on the face of the short plat:
a. “At the discretion of the City, the City may restrict outbound left turns from the E Pioneer access in the future. At the request of the City, the Owners, Heirs, Successors and Assigns agree to renovate and/or improve the driveway access in accordance with the City of Puyallup Municipal Code and Engineering Standards.”
At the time of civil permit review provide a separate street lighting plan and pavement striping plan (channelization) sheet for the City to review.
a. Street lighting plan:
i. City standard streetlights are required every 150ft along E Pioneer frontage.
ii. E Pioneer (Arterial) will require GE EVOLVE ELR2 Fixtures ERL2-3-23-A3-40-D-Gray-A-V1 (City to provide latest part numbers)
iii. The existing service cabinet at the E Pioneer/Shaw Rd traffic signal has capacity to power the E Pioneer streetlights.
iv. City would allow new streetlights to be installed on the north side of E Pioneer to avoid overhead utility conflicts.
v. If the applicant choses to install streetlights on the south side of E Pioneer, it is the sole responsibility of the design engineer to ensure streetlight design/placement is outside of the 10ft minimum “safe zone” area. The City will not allow streetlights to be within 10ft of the PSE primary for safety reasons.
vi. Streetlights shall have shorting caps installed with remote photocell located on the service cabinet.
vii. The existing PSE utility pole mounted streetlight does not meet current City standards and will be removed with installation of City standard streetlights.
viii. Streetlight design shall provide the following:
1. Provide details on how streetlights will be powered
2. Location of conduit runs
3. Wiring Schedule
a. Conduit size and type for each raceway
b. Conductors details
4. Pole schedule
a. STA & offset for each luminaire
5. Show location of junction boxes
b. Channelization + signage plan:
i. Shaw Rd/E Pioneer traffic signal may require striping and signage modifications based on the design of the E Pioneer frontage/driveway.
ii. The new Shaw Rd traffic signal will also require striping and signage modifications.
iii. Pavement markings approaching traffic signal shall be thermoplastic
Traffic signal modifications
a. The Shaw Rd access intersection (signal) will require modifications to accommodate the proposed driveway. The applicant will coordinate with the City’s Adaptive Signal Contractor to purchase/install/configure proprietary equipment.
b. Signal designer will implement modifications to the westbound and eastbound approach:
i. Signal heads + phases
ii. Flashing yellow arrows
iii. Left turn phases
iv. Striping/channelization modifications - Channelization shall match the assumptions outlined in the TIA. The EB approach (leaving Safeway) will need to be restriped to accommodate the updated channelization.
c. The applicant will install a new crosswalk at this signal to accommodate pedestrians crossing Shaw Rd. At this location, only one crosswalk will be allowed to cross Shaw Rd.
d. Crosswalk will be installed on the south leg of the intersections (see additional requirements below).
e. The required signal/intersection modifications must be fully configured and operational no less than 2 weeks prior to receiving occupancy for any building on-site. Adaptive signal contractor (Rhythm Engineering) will be required to configure the adaptive system on-site. Adaptive contractor will provide setup/configuration/optimization (not completed by the City).
f. there’s an existing overhead fiber run that will need to be spliced/connected with the cabinet. These design elements and conditions must be on the plans.
g. At the SE corner of the new Shaw Rd access location, adequate ROW must be dedicated, or an easement granted for signal maintenance purposes.
Based on comments received from the school district, this site will not receive bus service for students attending Shaw Rd Elementary. These students will be expected to walk. Based on the increase volume of elementary age students walking to Shaw Rd Elementary. The City will require the following modifications:
a. At the new traffic signal, an electronic blank-out sign shall be mounted on the eastbound signal pole that restricts eastbound right turns when pedestrians are using the crossing
b. Internal pedestrian paths will need to accommodate safe routing to the traffic signal.
c. Reduced Speed School Zone along Shaw Rd has been requested by the School District. The City has determined a reduced speed school zone is feasible/warranted for Shaw Rd Elementary (to be installed by the East Town Crossing development). School zone flashers designed/installed with this project that meets current WAC and MUTCD requirements. Coordinate with the City for required hardware & wireless interconnect.
d. Coordinate with the City of Puyallup and the Puyallup School District for the preferred off-site bus stop locations
Civil plan set shall provide a detailed channelization plan for all striping & pavement markings in within ROW. All proposed striping shall meet City and MUTCD requirements. Plan shall include signage located in ROW. All City standard details related to pavement markings, striping, sign placement must be provided.
Correction 2:
See Document Markup
Comments:
A SBL turn pocket will not be allowed at this intersection. This has been communicated to the design team on multiple occasions and is a condition of the preliminary site plan approval.
[Signal TS-01; Sht 1 of 5]
Correction 3:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Include complete signal design with upcoming (separate) civil submittal for frontage improvements along Shaw Rd and E Pioneer. The City's review of proposed signal improvements will occur when complete frontage design is submitted. Please reference preliminary site plan approval conditions for design requirements.
Correspondence sent 6/8/23:
Please make sure the signal designer reviews the conditions related to the signal design, streetlights, & school zone flashers (see below) prior to working on the civil design. This intersection will require coordination with our adaptive contractor for setup/configuration/optimization (not completed by the City). The EB approach (leaving Safeway) will need to be restriped to accommodate the updated channelization. Pedestrian enhancements will also be required (electronic blank out sign) to restrict right turns when pedestrians are in the crosswalk. Additionally, there will need to be reduced speed school zone flashers designed/installed with this project that meets current WAC and MUTCD requirements. Also, there’s an existing overhead fiber run that will need to be spliced/connected with the cabinet. These design elements and conditions must be on the plans.
[Signal TS-01; Sht 1 of 5]
Correction 4:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Construction access not allowed on Shaw Rd. Provide note that specifically restricts access.
[Plans C-2; Pg 2 of 45]
Correction 5:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Access not allowed @ Shaw Rd until Signal/Intersection are fully constructed and operational. Additionally, the E Pioneer access/frontage must be fully constructed per City standards prior to allowing public access @ Shaw Rd (current access proposal on E Pioneer is for construction only). Provide note on plans.
Per conditions of preliminary site plan approval:
The required signal/intersection modifications must be fully configured and operational no less than 2 weeks prior to receiving occupancy for any building on-site. Adaptive signal contractor (Rhythm Engineering) will be required to configure the adaptive system on-site.
[Plans C-3; Pg 3 of 45]
Correction 6:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Label this access for construction only (not suitable for public access). Per conditions of the preliminary site plan approval, occupancy for any building will not be granted until complete frontage improvements are fully constructed (Shaw Rd & E Pioneer frontages). This includes any roadway widening, City standard streetlighting, striping, signalization, signage, curb/gutter/sidewalk, reduced speed school zone, stormwater infrastructure, etc. Per in-person meetings with the applicant, phase 1 is not designed or intended to function as a standalone project (construction phasing only).
[Plans C-5; Pg 5 of 45]
Correction 7:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide clarification on why a fire turnaround is proposed. Will this be an interim/temporary condition during construction? Per in-person meetings with the applicant, phase 1 (this submittal) is not designed or intended to function as a standalone project (construction phasing only). It's my understanding the completion of phase 2 will not require a fire turnaround here (dual ROW access points + thru internal circulation provided). Building occupancy will not be granted until phase 2 frontage/access improvements are completed per PSP conditions.
[Plans C-6; Pg 6 of 45]
Public Works Water Review
Failed
09/05/2023
08/09/2023
Reviewer:
Corrections:
Correction 1:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil C-14: For pages C-14, C-15, C-16, C-17: Make corrections to all Development Engineering comments on these pages.
Correction 2:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil C-14: For pages C-14, C-15, C-16, C-17: Many of the proposed fire hydrant runs are located off dead-end 8-inch water mains, which reduces the available fire flow. Pay to have a hydraulic model of the proposed water layout, to see if the available fire flow will meet the building requirements.
Correction 3:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil C-14: For pages C-14, C-15: The existing 8-inch water main that runs through this project also supplies water to the property to the south, which requires the water main to be public. Since this existing water main will be running through proposed parking areas, the City will allow a one-time exception from our 40-foot utility easement requirement, and allow the water main to be placed in the middle of a 20-foot easement.
Correction 4:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil C-14: For pages C-14, C-15, C-16, C-17: All water infrastructure for this project outside the proposed public utility easement shall be private, and the property owners responsibility to repair and maintain. This includes all parts of each water service (i.e. connection taps, service line, meter setters, meter boxes, etc.), the only exception would be the water meters and radio transmission equipment (MXU) which would be owned by the City, but paid for and installed by the contractor.
Correction 5:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil C-14: For pages C-14, C-15, C-16, C-17: Do not block fire hydrants or FDC's with parking stalls. Move all blocked fire hydrants and FDC's into parking islands.
Correction 6:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil C-14: For pages C-14, C-15, C-16, C-17: If the buildings are housing just apartments, a DCVA will be sufficient back flow protection. If the buildings contain both commercial space and apartments, upgrade the protection to an above ground RPBA.
Correction 7:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil C-14: This line feeding a fire hydrant on C-16 is too long for a hydrant run, and will need to be 8-inch.
Correction 8:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil C-16: Install 8" MJ x 6" Fl tee, 6" GV, and hydrant off end of 8-inch run.
Correction 9:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil C-16: Install 8" MJ x 6" Fl tee, 6" GV, and hydrant off end of 8-inch run.
Correction 10:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil C-17: For flushing purposes install 8" MJ x 6" Fl tee, 6" GV, and hydrant off end of 8-inch run. Tee for building fire line should be placed before hydrant run.
Correction 11:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Landscape L1.0: No tree within 10-feet of water mains, hydrants, FDC's, PIV's, meters, and back flow protection. Provide 3-foot planting clear zone around hydrants, FDC's, PIV's, meters, and back flow protection.
Correction 12:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Landscape L1.0: No irrigation plan is shown. Show irrigation service, size of meter, protected by same size DCVA on Landscape and Civil plans.
Engineering Civil Review
Failed
09/05/2023
08/08/2023
Reviewer:
Corrections:
Correction 1:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Called out twice.
[Storm Report; Pg 1 of 164]
Correction 2:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Revise page numbering to align with the report sections.
[Storm Report; Pg 4 of 164]
Correction 3:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Parcel ...054.
Storm Report; Pg 5 of 164]
Correction 4:
See Document Markup
Comments:
The storm report should be written to reflect the overall 'common plan of development' to ensure adequate storm facilities and site discharge compliance... that includes both Phase 1 and Phase 2. Revise accordingly.
[Storm Report; Pg 5 of 164]
Correction 5:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Revise table to account for the overall 'common plan of development' (both Phase 1 and Phase 2).
[Storm Report; Pg 5 of 164]
Correction 6:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Breakout surface areas by phase and basin. (See basin exhibit comments, Fig. 5).
[Storm Report; Pg 5 of 164]
Correction 7:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Breakout Shaw Rd and Pioneer frontages separately.
[Storm Report; Pg 5 of 164]
Correction 8:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add commentary that the existing storm pond is located in the SE corner of the site and will be converted to an underground facility as part of this project.
[Storm Report; Pg 6 of 164]
Correction 9:
See Document Markup
Comments:
For the STORM REPORT ONLY, provide both the Phase 1 and Phase 2 grading and drainage plans in Appendix A. Identify the phase boundary on the plans.
[Storm Report; Pg 8 of 164]
Correction 10:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use 10yr developed inflow flow rate due to discharge to a regulated stream (Pioneer Ditch). If the TESC pond discharge location is into a pipe at the intersection, it is acceptable to use the 2yr developed inflow flow rate.
[Storm Report; Pg 8 of 164]
Correction 11:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add Interceptor Swales, Check Dams, and TESC pond (per CSWPPP).
[Storm Report; Pg 8 of 164]
Correction 12:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coordinate the 13 elements with the review comments on the CSWPPP.
[Storm Report; Pg 8 of 164]
Correction 13:
See Document Markup
Comments:
As mentioned previously, provide the LID Performance/Duration Curves to ensure compliance.
[Storm Report; Pg 11 of 164]
Correction 14:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add: "2yr" .
[Storm Report; Pg 11 of 164]
Correction 15:
See Document Markup
Comments:
pipe.
[Storm Report; Pg 11 of 164]
Correction 16:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-24in called out on civil plans.
[Storm Report; Pg 11 of 164]
Correction 17:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Revise-"stream/ditch".
[Storm Report; Pg 11 of 164]
Correction 18:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add: "mitigated".
[Storm Report; Pg 12 of 164]
Correction 19:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Clarify-Does this include the Phase 2 PGHS?. Phase 2 needs to be addressed as part of the 'Common Plan of Development'.
[Storm Report; Pg 12 of 164]
Correction 20:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Discuss Shaw Road frontage and Pioneer Way frontage WQ aspects.
[Storm Report; Pg 12 of 164]
Correction 21:
See Document Markup
Comments:
NOTE: Shaw Road approach exceeds 5000sf of bypass PGHS and must be treated prior to discharge to the public conveyance system.
[Storm Report; Pg 12 of 164]
Correction 22:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add: "emergency vehicle".
[Storm Report; Pg 12 of 164]
Correction 23:
See Document Markup
Comments:
The landuse application analyzed the site as one basin with one point-of-compliance (POC) which was acceptable for preliminary design. However, the commercial area and the multi-family area, including Phase 2 improvements, are separate sub-basins with one POC. Provide WWHM calculations which reflect the specific surface area types of each subbasin and the specific vault and control structure sizing for each subbasin.
[Storm Report; Pg 12 of 164]
Correction 24:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Discuss Shaw Road frontage and Pioneer Way frontage flow control aspects.
[Storm Report; Pg 12 of 164]
Correction 25:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Include Phase 2 improvements in the flow control design to ensure stormwater facilities are properly sized ('Common Plan of Development' rule).
[Storm Report; Pg 12 of 164]
Correction 26:
See Document Markup
Comments:
"The"?
Correction 27:
See Document Markup
Comments:
MR9 should reflect O&M requirements for the entire stormwater system onsite...suggested language "An operation and maintenance manual that is consistent with the provisions of PMC 21.10 and City Standards shall be provided for the proposed stormwater facilities and BMPs, and the parties responsible for the operation and maintenance shall be identified."
[Storm Report; Pg 13 of 164]
Correction 28:
See Document Markup
Comments:
The geotech report actually states that permeable paving and other BMPs may be possible. Clarify that it is the project's intent to comply with the LID Performance Standard rather than the List option.
[Storm Report; Pg 13 of 164]
Correction 29:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Revise-"stream/ditch".
[Storm Report; Pg 14 of 164]
Correction 30:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Suggest-"Offsite the pollution generating surface of Shaw Road frontage is not being expanded and the sidewalks will be permeable pavement."
[Storm Report; Pg 14 of 164]
Correction 31:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Revise-How is Pioneer Frontage going to be treated for water quality? (Over-detaining is not treatment methodolgy.)
[Storm Report; Pg 14 of 164]
Correction 32:
See Document Markup
Comments:
As previously mentioned, provide a backwater analysis of the Pioneer Avenue conveyance system as outlined in City Standards Section 204.3 considering the tailwater elevation (OHWM) of the Pioneer Avenue north ditch. The analysis shall include runoff from onsite (developed conditions) and offsite (existing conditions) basins tributary to the discharge location.
[Storm Report; Pg 15 of 164]
Correction 33:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Dedication of new ROW is required along Shaw Road and Pioneer frontages. Revise accordingly.
[Storm Report; Pg 15 of 164].
Correction 34:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add: "A Stormwater Maintenance Agreement will be recorded at the time of Occupancy in accordance with City Standards."
[Storm Report; Pg 15 of 164]
Correction 35:
See Document Markup
Comments:
The applicant will be required to post a financial guarantee in accordance with PMC 21.10.160.
[Storm Report; Pg 16 of 164].
Correction 36:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coordinate this sheet with the review comments associated with the CFG application.
[Storm Report; Pg 23 of 164].
Correction 37:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coordinate these sheets with the review comments associated with the CFG application.
[Storm Report; Pg 24 of 164].
Correction 38:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coordinate storm sheets with the review comments associated with the civil plans.
[Storm Report; Pg 29 of 164].
Correction 39:
See Document Markup
Comments:
The Basin Map should reflect the overall 'common plan of development' to ensure adequate storm facilities are constructed and site discharge compliance... that includes both Phase 1 and Phase 2. Revise accordingly.
[Storm Report; Pg 34 of 164]
Correction 40:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide a surface area breakdown by phase and basin name. For example, PH1 MF Roof area = ______sf (ac). Provide a total for each basin breakdown. Also, include the frontage bypass basins.
[Storm Report; Pg 34 of 164]
Correction 41:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Identify the Pioneer Frontage Basin.
[Storm Report; Pg 34 of 164]
Correction 42:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Identify the Shaw Rd Frontage Basin.
[Storm Report; Pg 34 of 164]
Correction 43:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Identify the Phase I and Phase II basins.
[Storm Report; Pg 34 of 164]
Correction 44:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Clarify-The civil plans appear to show this area being bypassed.
[Storm Report; Pg 34 of 164]
Correction 45:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per prior comment, include the groundwater monitoring results associated with Monitoring Wells #1 and #2 in the geotechnical section.
[Storm Report; Pg 35 of 164]
Correction 46:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide the referenced Table 1 for completeness.
[Storm Report; Pg 88 of 164].
Correction 47:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Prior to Occupancy, submit a DRAFT version of the City's Stormwater Management Facilities Agreement with an O&M manual using the maintenance activities described in the City's Stormwater Site Management Plan. The agreement shall be recorded with the Pierce County Auditors Office.
[Storm Report; Pg 95 of 164]
Correction 48:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide R-Tank O&M information.
[Storm Report; Pg 95 of 164]
Correction 49:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Sizing calculations for the existing storm facility serving the properties south of the project has been deferred to Phase 2. It is the applicant's responsibility to ensure the replacement facility complies with the original design constraints and does not conflict with the proposed improvements.
[Storm Report; Pg 111 of 164]
Correction 50:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Does not agree with Table 1. Also, the pre-developed condition should include the disturbed areas for both Phase 1 and Phase 2 (common plan of development), and the frontage bypass basins.
[Storm Report; Pg 113 of 164]
Correction 51:
See Document Markup
Comments:
The developed area should be broken into the individual subbasins (commercial and multi-family (including the Phase 2 improvements)) to reflect each basin's surface area types and verify the specific vault and control structure sizing of each.
[Storm Report; Pg 114 of 164]
Correction 52:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Does not agree with Table 1.
Storm Report; Pg 114 of 164]
Correction 53:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Include both the Shaw Road and Pioneer Way frontages in the bypass basin(s) (common plan of development).
[Storm Report; Pg 115 of 164]
Correction 54:
See Document Markup
Comments:
See comments on Mitigated Basin Data sheet, Pg 114 of 164. Revise accordingly.
[Storm Report; Pg 117 of 164]
Correction 55:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil plans callout a riser height of 1.23ft for RT1. Revise calculations to reflect the actual control risers being used for each subasin.
[Storm Report; Pg 117 of 164]
Correction 56:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Civil plans callout RT1 height of 3.35ft and available storage depth of 4.1ft (4.6ft of storage minus 6in of sediment storage = 4.1ft). Revise calculations to reflect the actual vaults (RTanks) being used for each subasin.
[Storm Report; Pg 117 of 164]
Correction 57:
See Document Markup
Comments:
For the multi-family basin, provide calculations of available storage associated with the detention pipe.
[Storm Report; Pg 117 of 164]
Correction 58:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Ensure that the detention facilities have accounted for 6in of sediment storage per Ecology's requirements.
[Storm Report; Pg 117 of 164]
Correction 59:
See Document Markup
Comments:
As mentioned previously, in addition to the Stream Duration curves above, provide the LID Duration curves to ensure compliance with the LID Performance Standard.
[Storm Report; Pg 119 of 164]
Correction 60:
See Document Markup
Comments:
As mentioned previously, this output does not agree with the LID Duration curves. Provide the LID Duration curves to ensure compliance with the LID Performance Standard.
[Storm Report; Pg 129 of 164]
Correction 61:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Depending on the outcome of the LID analysis (duration curves indicate "fail"), the project will have to increase the detention facilities to meet the LID Performance Standard or choose the MR5 List option.
[Storm Report; Pg 129 of 164]
Correction 62:
See Document Markup
Comments:
See comments on Predeveloped Basin Data sheet, Pg 113 of 164.
[Storm Report; Pg 131 of 164]
Correction 63:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Break the onsite basin into the individual subasins (commercial and multi-family) to ensure the vaults and control structures are correctly sized for each. The WWHM modeling should reflect both Phase 1 and Phase 2 improvements (common plan of development).
[Storm Report; Pg 132 of 164]
Correction 64:
See Document Markup
Comments:
RM-20.
[Plans C-1; Pg 1 of 45]
Correction 65:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Locate address below Vicinity Map and add an abbreviated legal description below the title (1/4-section, Sec., Twp., Rng.)
[Plans C-1; Pg 1 of 45]
Correction 66:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide frontage improvement plans for Phase 1. (Per conversation w/ JMcInnis 07/19/23 frontage improvements will be a separate civil application). [Plans C-1; Pg 1 of 45]
Correction 67:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add: Phase 1 to title.
[Plans C-1; Pg 1 of 45]
Correction 68:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Locate Vicinity Map in lower right-hand corner per CS Section 2.1.
[Plans C-1; Pg 1 of 45]
Correction 69:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Locate approval block in upper right-hand corner, all sheets, per CS Section 2.1.
[Plans C-1; Pg 1 of 45]
Correction 70:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Place North arrow correctly.
[Plans C-1; Pg 1 of 45]
Correction 71:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Augment the Construction Sequence-See example.
[Plans C-1; Pg 1 of 45]
Correction 72:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout earthwork quantities (cut/fill).
[Plans C-1; Pg 1 of 45]
Correction 73:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout the following information on all plan sheets:
Shaw Road // Pioneer Way // Show ROW lines and distance from centerline.
[Plans C-1; Pg 1 of 45]
Correction 74:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout the trash enclosure locations and provide detail(s). Reference City Standards 208.1 for requirements.
[Plans C-1; Pg 1 of 45]
Correction 75:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per City Standards Section 1.8 provide a landscape plan with a utility overlay (water, sewer, storm) and ensure no trees are located within 10ft of utility equipment (meters, hydrants, CBs, etc).
[Plans C-1; Pg 1 of 45]
Correction 76:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coordinate this sheet with the review comments associated with the CFG application PRGR20230972.
[Plans C-2; Pg 2 of 45]
Correction 77:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Place North arrow correctly.
[Plans C-2; Pg 2 of 45]
Correction 78:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Locate approval block in upper right-hand corner.
[Plans C-2; Pg 2 of 45]
Correction 79:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-C4?
[Plans C-3; Pg 3 of 45]
Correction 80:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-C5?
[Plans C-3; Pg 3 of 45]
Correction 81:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout stationing of approach centerline along Shaw Road.
[Plans C-3; Pg 3 of 45]
Correction 82:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout drive aisle width.
[Plans C-3; Pg 3 of 45]
Correction 83:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide detail.
[Plans C-3; Pg 3 of 45]
Correction 84:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add: "(Typical)".
[Plans C-3; Pg 3 of 45]
Correction 85:
See Document Markup
Comments:
How is this area being captured for detention? If bypassed, revise basin exhibit in the storm report.
[Plans C-3; Pg 3 of 45]
Correction 86:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide auto-turn analysis for the largest anticipated vehicle that would access the site to ensure adequate radii an dimensioning. Coordinate with Shaw Road frontage plans.
[Plans C-3; Pg 3 of 45]
Correction 87:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-The rim is called out to be approx. 7ft below TC?
[Plans C-3; Pg 3 of 45]
Correction 88:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show High Point Break Line.
[Plans C-3; Pg 3 of 45]
Correction 89:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coordinate with Sht C7.
[Plans C-3; Pg 3 of 45]
Correction 90:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coordinate pipe alignment with Sht C7.
[Plans C-3; Pg 3 of 45]
Correction 91:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coordinate structure reqt's with Sht C7.
[Plans C-3; Pg 3 of 45]
Correction 92:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-SDCB?
[Plans C-3; Pg 3 of 45]
Correction 93:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-SDCB?
[Plans C-3; Pg 3 of 45]
Correction 94:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-SDCB?
[Plans C-3; Pg 3 of 45]
Correction 95:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-is one curb inlet adequate for the tributary area?
[Plans C-3; Pg 3 of 45]
Correction 96:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide spot elevations at corners of raised crosswalk.
[Plans C-3; Pg 3 of 45]
Correction 97:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-SDCB?
[Plans C-3; Pg 3 of 45]
Correction 98:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-SDCB?
[Plans C-3; Pg 3 of 45]
Correction 99:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-SDCB?
[Plans C-3; Pg 3 of 45]
Correction 100:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coord IE with Sht C7.
[Plans C-3; Pg 3 of 45]
Correction 101:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-SDCB?
[Plans C-3; Pg 3 of 45]
Correction 102:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coord IE with Sht C7.
[Plans C-3; Pg 3 of 45]
Correction 103:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout radii of internal drive aisles and aisle widths. Or, show on a "dimensioning plan" sheet.
[Plans C-3; Pg 3 of 45]
Correction 104:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide ductile iron pipe for any storm conveyance with less than 3ft of cover.
[Plans C-3; Pg 3 of 45]
Correction 105:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Also identify existing contours as well the proposed contours.
[Plans C-3; Pg 3 of 45]
Correction 106:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Delineate the regulated floodplain on the plan.
[Plans C-3; Pg 3 of 45]
Correction 107:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout radii of internal drive aisles and aisle widths. Or, show on a "dimensioning plan" sheet.
[Plans C-4; Pg 4 of 45]
Correction 108:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide ductile iron pipe for any storm conveyance with less than 3ft of cover.
[Plans C-4; Pg 4 of 45]
Correction 109:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Also identify existing contours as well the proposed contours.
[Plans C-4; Pg 4 of 45]
Correction 110:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Readability.
[Plans C-4; Pg 4 of 45]
Correction 111:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-C6?
[Plans C-4; Pg 4 of 45]
Correction 112:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coordinate with Sht C8.
[Plans C-4; Pg 4 of 45]
Correction 113:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-C3?
[Plans C-4; Pg 4 of 45]
Correction 114:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Clarify-curb inlets? Provide detail how this functions.
[Plans C-4; Pg 4 of 45]
Correction 115:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show High Point Break Line.
[Plans C-4; Pg 4 of 45]
Correction 116:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coordinate IE with Sht C8.
[Plans C-4; Pg 4 of 45]
Correction 117:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show High Point Break Line.
[Plans C-4; Pg 4 of 45]
Correction 118:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coordinate BC with CB Rim elev.
[Plans C-4; Pg 4 of 45]
Correction 119:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show High Point Break Line.
[Plans C-4; Pg 4 of 45]
Correction 120:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Readability.
[Plans C-4; Pg 4 of 45]
Correction 121:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Identify contour within paving area (Typ).
[Plans C-4; Pg 4 of 45]
Correction 122:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coordinate IE with Sht C8.
[Plans C-4; Pg 4 of 45]
Correction 123:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show High Point Break Line.
[Plans C-4; Pg 4 of 45]
Correction 124:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coordinate IE with Sht C8.
[Plans C-4; Pg 4 of 45]
Correction 125:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-C3?
[Plans C-5; Pg 5 of 45]
Correction 126:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout radii of internal drive aisles and aisle widths. Or, show on a "dimensioning plan" sheet.
[Plans C-5; Pg 5 of 45]
Correction 127:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide ductile iron pipe for any storm conveyance with less than 3ft of cover.
[Plans C-5; Pg 5 of 45]
Correction 128:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Also identify existing contours as well the proposed contours.
[Plans C-5; Pg 5 of 45]
Correction 129:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Delineate the regulated floodplain on the plan.
[Plans C-5; Pg 5 of 45]
Correction 130:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coordinate structure info with Sht C9.
[Plans C-5; Pg 5 of 45]
Correction 131:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coordinate structure info with Sht C9.
[Plans C-5; Pg 5 of 45]
Correction 132:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coordinate IE with Sht C9.
[Plans C-5; Pg 5 of 45]
Correction 133:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coordinate structure info with Sht C9.
[Plans C-5; Pg 5 of 45]
Correction 134:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coordinate structure info with Sht C9.
[Plans C-5; Pg 5 of 45]
Correction 135:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Identify contours w/in the drive aisle (Typ).
[Plans C-5; Pg 5 of 45]
Correction 136:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coordinate structure info with Sht C9.
[Plans C-5; Pg 5 of 45]
Correction 137:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-C6?
[Plans C-5; Pg 5 of 45]
Correction 138:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coordinate structure info with Sht C9.
[Plans C-5; Pg 5 of 45]
Correction 139:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coordinate structure info with Sht C9.
[Plans C-5; Pg 5 of 45]
Correction 140:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-C4?.
[Plans C-6; Pg 6 of 45]
Correction 141:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coordinate IE with Sht C10.
[Plans C-6; Pg 6 of 45]
Correction 142:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout radii of internal drive aisles and aisle widths. Or, show on a "dimensioning plan" sheet.
[Plans C-6; Pg 6 of 45]
Correction 143:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide ductile iron pipe for any storm conveyance with less than 3ft of cover.
[Plans C-6; Pg 6 of 45]
Correction 144:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coordinate structure info with Sht C8.
[Plans C-6; Pg 6 of 45]
Correction 145:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coordinate IE with Sht C8.
[Plans C-6; Pg 6 of 45]
Correction 146:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coordinate structure info with Sht C8.
[Plans C-6; Pg 6 of 45]
Correction 147:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coordinate IE with Sht C8.
[Plans C-6; Pg 6 of 45]
Correction 148:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Also identify existing contours as well the proposed contours.
[Plans C-6; Pg 6 of 45]
Correction 149:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-C5?.
[Plans C-6; Pg 6 of 45]
Correction 150:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coordinate IE with Sht C10.
[Plans C-6; Pg 6 of 45]
Correction 151:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coordinate structure info with Sht C10.
[Plans C-6; Pg 6 of 45]
Correction 152:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coordinate IE with Sht C10.
[Plans C-6; Pg 6 of 45]
Correction 153:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coordinate IE with Sht C10.
[Plans C-6; Pg 6 of 45]
Correction 154:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coordinate structure info with Sht C10.
[Plans C-6; Pg 6 of 45]
Correction 155:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-C8?
[Plans C-7; Pg 7 of 45]
Correction 156:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-4/C18?
[Plans C-7; Pg 7 of 45]
Correction 157:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout R-Tank IE.
[Plans C-7; Pg 7 of 45]
Correction 158:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-C9?
[Plans C-7; Pg 7 of 45]
Correction 159:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout diameter and lid type.
[Plans C-7; Pg 7 of 45]
Correction 160:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Confirm-Type 2 CB or manhole?
[Plans C-7; Pg 7 of 45]
Correction 161:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-1/C18?
[Plans C-7; Pg 7 of 45]
Correction 162:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per prior comment, storm pipe downstream of the control structure is a conveyance pipe subject to City Stds (size, slope, etc.). Conveyance pipes that do not meet standards must be approved by the City Engineer via the Alternative Methods Request (AMR) process.
[Plans C-7; Pg 7 of 45]
Correction 163:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout IE.
[Plans C-7; Pg 7 of 45]
Correction 164:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Top of CB is below detention water surface elevation. Also, Sht C3 indicates the rim is 7ft below top of curb. Revise accordingly.
[Plans C-7; Pg 7 of 45]
Correction 165:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Min. 1ft of cover on DI pipe.
[Plans C-7; Pg 7 of 45]
Correction 166:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Min. 1ft of cover on DI pipe.
[Plans C-7; Pg 7 of 45]
Correction 167:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-bottom of vault at 68.63, so 0% slope is not correct.
[Plans C-7; Pg 7 of 45]
Correction 168:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Changes in direction require CB.
[Plans C-7; Pg 7 of 45]
Correction 169:
See Document Markup
Comments:
SDMH...callout diameter and lid type.
[Plans C-7; Pg 7 of 45]
Correction 170:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide structure information.
[Plans C-7; Pg 7 of 45]
Correction 171:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout diameter and lid type.
[Plans C-7; Pg 7 of 45]
Correction 172:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Not acceptable to use the FC structure as a catch basin...single-use structure per City Standards.
[Plans C-7; Pg 7 of 45]
Correction 173:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Confirm-Type 2 CB or manhole?
[Plans C-7; Pg 7 of 45]
Correction 174:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify rim elevation...6ft riser + 05ft clear above top of riser results in an elevation of 74.5 to underside of the control structure.
[Plans C-7; Pg 7 of 45]
Correction 175:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-36in called out on Sht 29 of 45.
[Plans C-7; Pg 7 of 45]
Correction 176:
See Document Markup
Comments:
WWHM calculations callout a riser height of 6ft. Revise accordingly.
[Plans C-7; Pg 7 of 45]
Correction 177:
See Document Markup
Comments:
WWHM calculations callout a riser height of 6ft. Revise accordingly.
[Plans C-7; Pg 7 of 45]
Correction 178:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify rim elevation...6ft riser + 05ft clear above top of riser results in an elevation of 74.5 to underside of the control structure.
[Plans C-7; Pg 7 of 45]
Correction 179:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Outlet.
[Plans C-7; Pg 7 of 45]
Correction 180:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide structure information.
[Plans C-7; Pg 7 of 45]
Correction 181:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Clarify-to be provided with Phase 2?
[Plans C-7; Pg 7 of 45]
Correction 182:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Clarify-there is no existing MH at this location.
[Plans C-7; Pg 7 of 45]
Correction 183:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-based on ARG survey, this elevation is approx. 4ft below the storm conveyance system located at the intersection.
[Plans C-7; Pg 7 of 45]
Correction 184:
See Document Markup
Comments:
City Standards require 0.5% min pipe slope.
[Plans C-7; Pg 7 of 45]
Correction 185:
See Document Markup
Comments:
City Standards require 0.5% min pipe slope.
[Plans C-7; Pg 7 of 45]
Correction 186:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout 2ft min clearance to water line.
[Plans C-7; Pg 7 of 45]
Correction 187:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Readability.
[Plans C-7; Pg 7 of 45]
Correction 188:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Storm-Water conflict...revise accordingly.
[Plans C-7; Pg 7 of 45]
Correction 189:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide an "Overall" storm sheet showing the storm alignments.
[Plans C-7; Pg 7 of 45]
Correction 190:
See Document Markup
Comments:
NOTE: Shaw Road approach exceeds 5000sf of bypass PGHS and must be treated prior to discharge to the public conveyance system.
[Plans C-7; Pg 7 of 45]
Correction 191:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide ductile iron pipe for any storm conveyance with less than 3ft of cover.
[Plans C-7; Pg 7 of 45]
Correction 192:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show locations of the roof drain connection to the storm system.
[Plans C-7; Pg 7 of 45]
Correction 193:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide utility crossing information.
[Plans C-7; Pg 7 of 45]
Correction 194:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add Placeholder: "See Frontage Improvement Plans, Application ______".
[Plans C-7; Pg 7 of 45]
Correction 195:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Delineate the regulated floodplain on the plan.
[Plans C-7; Pg 7 of 45]
Correction 196:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide utility crossing information.
[Plans C-8; Pg 8 of 45]
Correction 197:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide ductile iron pipe for any storm conveyance with less than 3ft of cover.
[Plans C-8; Pg 8 of 45]
Correction 198:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show locations of the roof drain connection to the storm system.
[Plans C-8; Pg 8 of 45]
Correction 199:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add Placeholder: "See Frontage Improvement Plans, Application ______".
[Plans C-8; Pg 8 of 45]
Correction 200:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-C7?
[Plans C-8; Pg 8 of 45]
Correction 201:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide structure information.
[Plans C-8; Pg 8 of 45]
Correction 202:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout diameter and lid type.
[Plans C-8; Pg 8 of 45]
Correction 203:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Confirm-Type 2 CB or manhole?
[Plans C-8; Pg 8 of 45]
Correction 204:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-bottom of vault at 68.63, so 0% slope is not correct.
[Plans C-8; Pg 8 of 45]
Correction 205:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout R-Tank IE.
[Plans C-8; Pg 8 of 45]
Correction 206:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-36in called out on Sht 35 of 45.
[Plans C-8; Pg 8 of 45]
Correction 207:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-C10?
[Plans C-8; Pg 8 of 45]
Correction 208:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout diameter and lid type.
[Plans C-8; Pg 8 of 45]
Correction 209:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout diameter and lid type.
[Plans C-8; Pg 8 of 45]
Correction 210:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Confirm-Type 2 CB or manhole?
[Plans C-8; Pg 8 of 45]
Correction 211:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Confirm-Type 2 CB or manhole?
[Plans C-8; Pg 8 of 45]
Correction 212:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-This is 4ft lower than the discharge main.
[Plans C-8; Pg 8 of 45]
Correction 213:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-IE does not agree with pipe slope (0.84%).
[Plans C-8; Pg 8 of 45]
Correction 214:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-This is 4ft lower than the discharge main.
[Plans C-8; Pg 8 of 45]
Correction 215:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout diameter.
[Plans C-8; Pg 8 of 45]
Correction 216:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout diameter.
[Plans C-8; Pg 8 of 45]
Correction 217:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Ensure no ponding along adjacent properties as a result of fill. (Typical) (May need to provide a storm conveyance system to collect ponded water).
[Plans C-8; Pg 8 of 45]
Correction 218:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Ensure no ponding along adjacent properties as a result of fill. (Typical) (May need to provide a storm conveyance system to collect ponded water).
[Plans C-8; Pg 8 of 45]
Correction 219:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-C8?
[Plans C-10; Pg 10 of 45]
Correction 220:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show locations of the roof drain connection to the storm system.
[Plans C-10; Pg 10 of 45]
Correction 221:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout R-Tank IE.
[Plans C-10; Pg 10 of 45]
Correction 222:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide ductile iron pipe for any storm conveyance with less than 3ft of cover.
[Plans C-10; Pg 10 of 45]
Correction 223:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout diameter.
[Plans C-10; Pg 10 of 45]
Correction 224:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-12in called out on Sht 41 of 45.
[Plans C-10; Pg 10 of 45]
Correction 225:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-C9?
[Plans C-10; Pg 10 of 45]
Correction 226:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Readability.
[Plans C-10; Pg 10 of 45]
Correction 227:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout diameter.
[Plans C-10; Pg 10 of 45]
Correction 228:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Identify existing and proposed contours.
[Plans C-10; Pg 10 of 45]
Correction 229:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout that the existing storm facility will be remediated during Phase 2.
[Plans C-10; Pg 10 of 45]
Correction 230:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide an "Overall" sheet for water and sewer showing alignments. (Okay to combine water and sewer on one sheet, if desired).
[Plans C-11; Pg 11 of 45]
Correction 231:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Clarify proposed tenant spaces. Any space involved with food preparation requires an external grease interceptor. If tenancy is unknown, it may be in the project's best interest to install a grease interceptor at this time rather than at time of Tenant Improvement.
[Plans C-11; Pg 11 of 45]
Correction 232:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout Sampling Connection per Std Detail 04.03.04.
[Plans C-11; Pg 11 of 45]
Correction 233:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout diameter.
[Plans C-11; Pg 11 of 45]
Correction 234:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide utility crossing information.
[Plans C-11; Pg 11 of 45]
Correction 235:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coordinate pipe slope with existing elevations from the Record Dwgs associated with Permit E-21-0426.
[Plans C-11; Pg 11 of 45]
Correction 236:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Delineate the regulated floodplain on the plan.
[Plans C-11; Pg 11 of 45]
Correction 237:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout Sampling Connection per Std Detail 04.03.04.
[Plans C-11; Pg 11 of 45]
Correction 238:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout "existing".
[Plans C-11; Pg 11 of 45]
Correction 239:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout "existing".
[Plans C-11; Pg 11 of 45]
Correction 240:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Ductile Iron per Record Dwgs.
[Plans C-11; Pg 11 of 45]
Correction 241:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-Record Dwgs indicate this connection as a simple tie-in to an existing stub and no structure.
[Plans C-11; Pg 11 of 45]
Correction 242:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coordinate existing elevations with the Record Dwgs associated with Permit E-21-0426.
[Plans C-11; Pg 11 of 45]
Correction 243:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coordinate pipe run with the Record Dwgs associated with Permit E-21-0426.
[Plans C-11; Pg 11 of 45]
Correction 244:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coordinate existing elevations with the Record Dwgs associated with Permit E-21-0426.
[Plans C-11; Pg 11 of 45]
Correction 245:
See Document Markup
Comments:
East Side Sewer?
[Plans C-11; Pg 11 of 45]
Correction 246:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-C12?
[Plans C-11; Pg 11 of 45]
Correction 247:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Identify the storm system background (typ).
[Plans C-11; Pg 11 of 45]
Correction 248:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Readability.
[Plans C-11; Pg 11 of 45]
Correction 249:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout diameter.
[Plans C-11; Pg 11 of 45]
Correction 250:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide 10ft of horizontal separation btwn water and sewer or encase sewer in accordance with Std Detail 03.01.03-1&2.
[Plans C-11; Pg 11 of 45]
Correction 251:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout diameter.
[Plans C-11; Pg 11 of 45]
Correction 252:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-C13?
[Plans C-11; Pg 11 of 45]
Correction 253:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide utility crossing information.
[Plans C-12; Pg 12 of 45]
Correction 254:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout diameter.
[Plans C-12; Pg 12 of 45]
Correction 255:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-C11?
[Plans C-12; Pg 12 of 45]
Correction 256:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout diameter.
[Plans C-12; Pg 12 of 45]
Correction 257:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout diameter.
[Plans C-12; Pg 12 of 45]
Correction 258:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout diameter.
[Plans C-12; Pg 12 of 45]
Correction 259:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout east and south pipes.
[Plans C-12; Pg 12 of 45]
Correction 260:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout diameter.
[Plans C-12; Pg 12 of 45]
Correction 261:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Clarify what is supposed to be happening here?
[Plans C-12; Pg 12 of 45]
Correction 262:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Revise IEs to reflect downstream system.
[Plans C-12; Pg 12 of 45]
Correction 263:
See Document Markup
Comments:
North IE = 69.08. Revise accordingly.
[Plans C-12; Pg 12 of 45]
Correction 264:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout diameter.
[Plans C-12; Pg 12 of 45]
Correction 265:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-IE is below the downstream outlet pipe. Revise accordingly.
[Plans C-12; Pg 12 of 45]
Correction 266:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-IE is below the downstream outlet pipe. Revise accordingly.
[Plans C-12; Pg 12 of 45]
Correction 267:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-IE is higher than the side sewer IE.
[Plans C-12; Pg 12 of 45]
Correction 268:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-IE is higher than the side sewer IE.
[Plans C-12; Pg 12 of 45]
Correction 269:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Identify the storm system background (typ).
[Plans C-12; Pg 12 of 45]
Correction 270:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-C11?
[Plans C-13; Pg 13 of 45]
Correction 271:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Readability.
[Plans C-13; Pg 13 of 45]
Correction 272:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout diameter.
[Plans C-13; Pg 13 of 45]
Correction 273:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout stub.
[Plans C-13; Pg 13 of 45]
Correction 274:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Readability.
[Plans C-13; Pg 13 of 45]
Correction 275:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide utility crossing information.
[Plans C-13; Pg 13 of 45]
Correction 276:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Delineate the regulated floodplain on the plan.
[Plans C-13; Pg 13 of 45]
Correction 277:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add Fire Code Official approval block to the Water plan sheets. (Ref. City Stds Section 1.4.
[Plans C-14; Pg 14 of 45]
Correction 278:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show proposed sewer backgrounds.
[Plans C-14; Pg 14 of 45]
Correction 279:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide utility crossing information.
[Plans C-14; Pg 14 of 45]
Correction 280:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Indicate valve locations.
[Plans C-14; Pg 14 of 45]
Correction 281:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Note: If any buildings require a fire system pump, the FDC shall connect to the downstream (discharge) side of the pump outlet.
[Plans C-14; Pg 14 of 45]
Correction 282:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Note: See Fire Code Official's comments regarding hydrant and FDC locations. Revise accordingly.
[Plans C-14; Pg 14 of 45]
Correction 283:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Delineate the regulated floodplain on the plan.
[Plans C-14; Pg 14 of 45]
Correction 284:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Specify meter size.
[Plans C-14; Pg 14 of 45]
Correction 285:
See Document Markup
Comments:
FDC must be located within 10ft-15ft of a hydrant. Also, the FDC is routed thru the DDCVA unless using a pump.
[Plans C-14; Pg 14 of 45]
Correction 286:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-detail reference.
[Plans C-14; Pg 14 of 45]
Correction 287:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Confirm-Callout info.
[Plans C-14; Pg 14 of 45]
Correction 288:
See Document Markup
Comments:
City Standards require meters to be located at the ROW. Meter locations shall be subject to approval of the Water Dept. (Typ)
[Plans C-14; Pg 14 of 45]
Correction 289:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout 2ft min clearance to storm line.
[Plans C-14; Pg 14 of 45]
Correction 290:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-C16?
[Plans C-14; Pg 14 of 45]
Correction 291:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Identify the storm system background (typ).
[Plans C-14; Pg 14 of 45]
Correction 292:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout DCVA.
[Plans C-14; Pg 14 of 45]
Correction 293:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout fitting, type, valve, and thrust block.
[Plans C-14; Pg 14 of 45]
Correction 294:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-90 bend.
[Plans C-14; Pg 14 of 45]
Correction 295:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-two valves shown.
[Plans C-14; Pg 14 of 45]
Correction 296:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Specify meter size and callout DCVA.
[Plans C-14; Pg 14 of 45]
Correction 297:
See Document Markup
Comments:
FDC must be located within 10ft-15ft of a hydrant. Also, the FDC is routed thru the DDCVA unless using a pump.
[Plans C-14; Pg 14 of 45]
Correction 298:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-detail reference.
[Plans C-14; Pg 14 of 45]
Correction 299:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-detail reference.
[Plans C-14; Pg 14 of 45]
Correction 300:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Max hydrant run is 20ft. Use 8in branch line to supply hydrant lead as shown. Callout fitting info.
[Plans C-14; Pg 14 of 45]
Correction 301:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout fitting, type, valve, and thrust block.
[Plans C-14; Pg 14 of 45]
Correction 302:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-are two valves necessary at this location?
[Plans C-14; Pg 14 of 45]
Correction 303:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-cutting-in new valve?
[Plans C-14; Pg 14 of 45]
Correction 304:
See Document Markup
Comments:
City Stds require tapping sleeve for new connections to existing mains. Revise accordingly.
[Plans C-14; Pg 14 of 45]
Correction 305:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout pipe run.
[Plans C-14; Pg 14 of 45]
Correction 306:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout fitting, type, valve, and thrust block.
[Plans C-14; Pg 14 of 45]
Correction 307:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout hydrant assembly.
[Plans C-14; Pg 14 of 45]
Correction 308:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout fitting and thrust block.
[Plans C-14; Pg 14 of 45]
Correction 309:
See Document Markup
Comments:
City Stds require tapping sleeve for new connections to existing mains. Revise accordingly.
[Plans C-14; Pg 14 of 45]
Correction 310:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-is valve necessary?
[Plans C-14; Pg 14 of 45]
Correction 311:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout fitting, type, valve, and thrust block.
[Plans C-14; Pg 14 of 45]
Correction 312:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Water-Storm Vault conflict...revise accordingly.
[Plans C-14; Pg 14 of 45]
Correction 313:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-leader location.
[Plans C-14; Pg 14 of 45]
Correction 314:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout fitting, type, valve, and thrust block.
[Plans C-14; Pg 14 of 45]
Correction 315:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout pipe run.
[Plans C-14; Pg 14 of 45]
Correction 316:
See Document Markup
Comments:
See comment on Sht C11 regarding separation between water and sewer.
[Plans C-14; Pg 14 of 45]
Correction 317:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-C15?
[Plans C-14; Pg 14 of 45]
Correction 318:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-Cross (MJxMJxMJxFL).
[Plans C-14; Pg 14 of 45]
Correction 319:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-detail reference.
[Plans C-14; Pg 14 of 45]
Correction 320:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout fitting, type, valve, and thrust block.
[Plans C-14; Pg 14 of 45]
Correction 321:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide 3ft clear zone and level area all around hydrant.
[Plans C-14; Pg 14 of 45]
Correction 322:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Clarify-hydrant port direction.
[Plans C-14; Pg 14 of 45]
Correction 323:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-detail reference.
[Plans C-14; Pg 14 of 45]
Correction 324:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add Fire Code Official approval block to the Water plan sheets. (Ref. City Stds Section 1.4.
[Plans C-15; Pg 15 of 45]
Correction 325:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show proposed sewer backgrounds.
[Plans C-15; Pg 15 of 45]
Correction 326:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide utility crossing information.
[Plans C-15; Pg 15 of 45]
Correction 327:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Indicate valve locations.
[Plans C-15; Pg 15 of 45]
Correction 328:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Note: If any buildings require a fire system pump, the FDC shall connect to the downstream (discharge) side of the pump outlet.
[Plans C-15; Pg 15 of 45]
Correction 329:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Note: See Fire Code Official's comments regarding hydrant and FDC locations. Revise accordingly.
[Plans C-15; Pg 15 of 45]
Correction 330:
See Document Markup
Comments:
City Stds require tapping sleeve for new connections to existing mains. Revise accordingly.
[Plans C-15; Pg 15 of 45]
Correction 331:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Specify meter size and callout DCVA.
[Plans C-15; Pg 15 of 45]
Correction 332:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Specify meter size and callout DCVA.
[Plans C-15; Pg 15 of 45]
Correction 333:
See Document Markup
Comments:
FDC must be located within 10ft-15ft of a hydrant. Also, the FDC is routed thru the DDCVA unless using a pump.
[Plans C-15; Pg 15 of 45]
Correction 334:
See Document Markup
Comments:
FDC must be located within 10ft-15ft of a hydrant. Also, the FDC is routed thru the DDCVA unless using a pump.
[Plans C-15; Pg 15 of 45]
Correction 335:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-C14?
[Plans C-15; Pg 15 of 45]
Correction 336:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-C17?
[Plans C-15; Pg 15 of 45]
Correction 337:
See Document Markup
Comments:
City Stds require tapping sleeve for new connections to existing mains. Revise accordingly.
[Plans C-15; Pg 15 of 45]
Correction 338:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout fitting, type, valve, and thrust block.
[Plans C-15; Pg 15 of 45]
Correction 339:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout fitting, type, valve, and thrust block.
[Plans C-15; Pg 15 of 45]
Correction 340:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-valve location.
[Plans C-15; Pg 15 of 45]
Correction 341:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-leader location.
[Plans C-15; Pg 15 of 45]
Correction 342:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Rotate hydrant to face drive aisle.
[Plans C-15; Pg 15 of 45]
Correction 343:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-two valves shown.
[Plans C-15; Pg 15 of 45]
Correction 344:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Max hydrant run is 20ft. Use 8in branch line to supply hydrant lead as shown. Callout fitting info.
[Plans C-14; Pg 14 of 45]
Correction 345:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout fitting, type, valve, and thrust block.
[Plans C-15; Pg 15 of 45]
Correction 346:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Clarify.
[Plans C-15; Pg 15 of 45]
Correction 347:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-detail reference.
[Plans C-15; Pg 15 of 45]
Correction 348:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Clarify.
[Plans C-15; Pg 15 of 45]
Correction 349:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout fitting, type, valve, and thrust block.
[Plans C-15; Pg 15 of 45]
Correction 350:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Rotate hydrant to face drive aisle.
[Plans C-15; Pg 15 of 45]
Correction 351:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add Fire Code Official approval block to the Water plan sheets. (Ref. City Stds Section 1.4.
[Plans C-16; Pg 16 of 45]
Correction 352:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-C14?
[Plans C-16; Pg 16 of 45]
Correction 353:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show proposed sewer backgrounds.
[Plans C-16; Pg 16 of 45]
Correction 354:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Indicate valve locations.
[Plans C-16; Pg 16 of 45]
Correction 355:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Note: If any buildings require a fire system pump, the FDC shall connect to the downstream (discharge) side of the pump outlet.
[Plans C-16; Pg 16 of 45]
Correction 356:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Delineate the regulated floodplain on the plan.
[Plans C-16; Pg 16 of 45]
Correction 357:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-C17?
[Plans C-16; Pg 16 of 45]
Correction 358:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Clarify-if main jogs, callout fitting info.
[Plans C-16; Pg 16 of 45]
Correction 359:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout fitting, type, valve, and thrust block.
[Plans C-16; Pg 16 of 45]
Correction 360:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout fitting, type, valve, and thrust block.
[Plans C-16; Pg 16 of 45]
Correction 361:
See Document Markup
Comments:
FDC must be located within 10ft-15ft of a hydrant. Also, the FDC is routed thru the DDCVA unless using a pump.
[Plans C-16; Pg 16 of 45]
Correction 362:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-detail reference.
[Plans C-16; Pg 16 of 45]
Correction 363:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-detail reference.
[Plans C-16; Pg 16 of 45]
Correction 364:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout fitting, type, valve, and thrust block.
[Plans C-16; Pg 16 of 45]
Correction 365:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add Fire Code Official approval block to the Water plan sheets. (Ref. City Stds Section 1.4.
[Plans C-17; Pg 17 of 45]
Correction 366:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show proposed sewer backgrounds.
[Plans C-17; Pg 17 of 45]
Correction 367:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Indicate valve locations.
[Plans C-17; Pg 17 of 45]
Correction 368:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Note: If any buildings require a fire system pump, the FDC shall connect to the downstream (discharge) side of the pump outlet.
[Plans C-17; Pg 17 of 45]
Correction 369:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-C16?
[Plans C-17; Pg 17 of 45]
Correction 370:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-C15?
[Plans C-17; Pg 17 of 45]
Correction 371:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Specify meter size and callout DCVA.
[Plans C-17; Pg 17 of 45]
Correction 372:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-detail reference.
[Plans C-17; Pg 17 of 45]
Correction 373:
See Document Markup
Comments:
FDC must be located within 10ft-15ft of a hydrant. Also, the FDC is routed thru the DDCVA unless using a pump.
[Plans C-17; Pg 17 of 45]
Correction 374:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-detail reference.
[Plans C-17; Pg 17 of 45]
Correction 375:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout fitting, type, valve, and thrust block.
[Plans C-17; Pg 17 of 45]
Correction 376:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-detail reference.
[Plans C-17; Pg 17 of 45]
Correction 377:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-detail reference.
[Plans C-17; Pg 17 of 45]
Correction 378:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Specify meter size and callout DCVA.
[Plans C-17; Pg 17 of 45]
Correction 379:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Specify meter size and callout DCVA.
[Plans C-17; Pg 17 of 45]
Correction 380:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Clarify.
[Plans C-17; Pg 17 of 45]
Correction 381:
See Document Markup
Comments:
FDC must be located within 10ft-15ft of a hydrant. Also, the FDC is routed thru the DDCVA unless using a pump.
[Plans C-17; Pg 17 of 45]
Correction 382:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout fitting, type, valve, and thrust block.
[Plans C-17; Pg 17 of 45]
Correction 383:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Max hydrant run is 20ft. Use 8in branch line to supply hydrant lead as shown. Callout fitting info.
[Plans C-17; Pg 17 of 45]
Correction 384:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout 12in min clear to storm.
[Plans C-18; Pg 18 of 45]
Correction 385:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout 12in min clear to storm.
[Plans C-18; Pg 18 of 45]
Correction 386:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coordinate IE w Sht C7.
[Plans C-18; Pg 18 of 45]
Correction 387:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coordinate IE w Sht C7.
[Plans C-18; Pg 18 of 45]
Correction 388:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coordinate Profile Reference w Sht C7.
[Plans C-18; Pg 18 of 45]
Correction 389:
See Document Markup
Comments:
There are two water pipes crossing the profile.
[Plans C-18; Pg 18 of 45]
Correction 390:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide ductile iron pipe for any storm conveyance with less than 3ft of cover.
[Plans C-18; Pg 18 of 45]
Correction 391:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout 12in min clear to storm.
[Plans C-18; Pg 18 of 45]
Correction 392:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coordinate IE w Sht C7.
[Plans C-18; Pg 18 of 45]
Correction 393:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-36in detention pipe called out on Page 11 of storm report.
[Plans C-18; Pg 18 of 45]
Correction 394:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coordinate Profile Reference w Sht C7.
[Plans C-18; Pg 18 of 45]
Correction 395:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coordinate structure information w Sht C7.
[Plans C-18; Pg 18 of 45]
Correction 396:
See Document Markup
Comments:
At structures confirm whether Type 2 CB or Type 2 manhole used. Also, callout diameter and lid information.
[Plans C-18; Pg 18 of 45]
Correction 397:
See Document Markup
Comments:
If crossing is less than 12in, provide Etha Foam sheet per attached.
[Plans C-18; Pg 18 of 45]
Correction 398:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-pipe material callout.
[Plans C-18; Pg 18 of 45]
Correction 399:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout watermain.
[Plans C-18; Pg 18 of 45]
Correction 400:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coordinate structure information w review comments on Sht C7.
[Plans C-18; Pg 18 of 45]
Correction 401:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-SDR?
[Plans C-18; Pg 18 of 45]
Correction 402:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-SDR?
[Plans C-18; Pg 18 of 45]
Correction 403:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-SDR?
[Plans C-19; Pg 19 of 45]
Correction 404:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide ductile iron pipe for any storm conveyance with less than 3ft of cover.
[Plans C-10; Pg 10 of 45]
Correction 405:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coordinate structure info with Sht C9.
[Plans C-19; Pg 19 of 45]
Correction 406:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coordinate structure info with Sht C9.
[Plans C-19; Pg 19 of 45]
Correction 407:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show and callout structure.
[Plans C-19; Pg 19 of 45]
Correction 408:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Confirm-is the intent to show this profile continuing to the R-Tank?
[Plans C-19; Pg 19 of 45]
Correction 409:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout IE.
[Plans C-19; Pg 19 of 45]
Correction 410:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout structure information (4 plcs).
[Plans C-19; Pg 19 of 45]
Correction 411:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout pipe information (4 plcs).
[Plans C-19; Pg 19 of 45]
Correction 412:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show Water Crossings.
[Plans C-20; Pg 20 of 45]
Correction 413:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout "existing".
[Plans C-20; Pg 20 of 45]
Correction 414:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coordinate existing elevations with the Record Dwgs associated with Permit E-21-0426.
[Plans C-20; Pg 20 of 45]
Correction 415:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coordinate pipe run with the Record Dwgs associated with Permit E-21-0426.
[Plans C-20; Pg 20 of 45]
Correction 416:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout "existing".
[Plans C-20; Pg 20 of 45]
Correction 417:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coordinate existing elevations with the Record Dwgs associated with Permit E-21-0426.
[Plans C-20; Pg 20 of 45]
Correction 418:
See Document Markup
Comments:
North Side Sewer?
[Plans C-20; Pg 20 of 45]
Correction 419:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Ductile Iron per Record Dwgs.
[Plans C-20; Pg 20 of 45]
Correction 420:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout "existing".
[Plans C-20; Pg 20 of 45]
Correction 421:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-Record Dwgs indicate this connection as a simple tie-in to an existing stub and no structure.
[Plans C-20; Pg 20 of 45]
Correction 422:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout structure diameters (typ).
[Plans C-20; Pg 20 of 45
Correction 423:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout structure diameters (typ).
[Plans C-20; Pg 20 of 45
Correction 424:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-24in?
[Plans C-20; Pg 20 of 45]
Correction 425:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coordinate IE with Sht C12.
[Plans C-20; Pg 20 of 45]
Correction 426:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coordinate IE with Sht C12.
[Plans C-20; Pg 20 of 45]
Correction 427:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-4?
[Plans C-20; Pg 20 of 45]
Correction 428:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Storm drain crosses in two places.
[Plans C-20; Pg 20 of 45]
Correction 429:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout structure diameters (typ).
[Plans C-20; Pg 20 of 45
Correction 430:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout east and north pipes.
[Plans C-20; Pg 20 of 45]
Correction 431:
See Document Markup
Comments:
These IEs are below the outlet.
[Plans C-20; Pg 20 of 45]
Correction 432:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Clarify-what is this pipe serving?
[Plans C-20; Pg 20 of 45]
Correction 433:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Note: Details marked with a red X are not relevant to this application. EoR's discretion whether to remove from the planset or not.
[Plans C-21; Pg 21 of 45]
Correction 434:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add City Std Detail 01.02.10.
[Plans C-21; Pg 21 of 45]
Correction 435:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use abbreviated legal description in title.
[Plans C-21; Pg 21 of 45]
Correction 436:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide a separate detail of the control riser with relevant information or callout on the city detail. Include notch info.
[Plans C-22; Pg 22 of 45]
Correction 437:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add City Std Details: 01.02.08a // 02.01.05 // 02.02.01 // 02.02.03.
[Plans C-22; Pg 22 of 45]
Correction 438:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use abbreviated legal description in title.
[Plans C-22; Pg 22 of 45]
Correction 439:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add City Std Detail 04.03.04 // 04.06.01 (as applicable) // 04.06.02 (as applicable).
[Plans C-23; Pg 23 of 45]
Correction 440:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use abbreviated legal description in title.
[Plans C-23; Pg 23 of 45]
Correction 441:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add City Std Detail 03.04.01 // 03.11.01.
[Plans C-24; Pg 24 of 45]
Correction 442:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use abbreviated legal description in title.
[Plans C-24; Pg 24 of 45]
Correction 443:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Place with Details 1&2/C24.
[Plans C-25; Pg 25 of 45]
Correction 444:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use abbreviated legal description in title.
[Plans C-25; Pg 25 of 45]
Correction 445:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add City Std Detail 06.01.01 // 06.01.02 // 06.01.03 // 06.01.04.
[Plans C-26; Pg 26 of 45]
Correction 446:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use abbreviated legal description in title.
[Plans C-26; Pg 26 of 45]
Correction 447:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Design for the 2yr release rate.
[Plans C-27; Pg 27 of 45]
Correction 448:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use abbreviated legal description in title.
[Plans C-27; Pg 27 of 45]
Correction 449:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Due to high groundwater, provide a manufactured synthetic liner to prevent groundwater intrusion into the detention facilities. Callout the synthetic liner requirements for material, installation, and protection; and show on the RTank details. In addition, provide buoyancy verification (calculations and/or certification letter).
[Plans Sht C-28; Pg 28 of 45]
Correction 450:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use abbreviated legal description in title.
[Plans C-28; Pg 28 of 45]
Correction 451:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Confirm module layout based on the subasin analysis (stage-storage requirements) per Storm Report comments, Pg 117 of 164.
[Plans C-28; Pg 28 of 45]
Correction 452:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use abbreviated legal description in title.
[Plans C-29; Pg 29 of 45]
Correction 453:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Due to high groundwater, use impermeable synthetic liner.
[Plans C-29; Pg 29 of 45]
Correction 454:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-12in called out on Sht 7 of 45.
[Plans C-29; Pg 29 of 45]
Correction 455:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-that this minimum cover is adequate to support EV Outrigger load of 23,000lb point load anywhere on RTank; as well as HS20 loading.
[Plans C-29; Pg 29 of 45]
Correction 456:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Confirm stage-storage requirements with subasin analysis per Storm Report comments, Pg 117 of 164.
[Plans C-29; Pg 29 of 45]
Correction 457:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Ensure available storage accounts for 6in of sediment storage per Ecology's requirements.
[Plans C-29; Pg 29 of 45]
Correction 458:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide the 2yr and 10yr, water surface elevations.
[Plans C-29; Pg 29 of 45]
Correction 459:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use abbreviated legal description in title.
[Plans C-31; Pg 30 of 45]
Correction 460:
See Document Markup
Comments:
NOTE: Sheet sequencing changed.
[Plans C-31; Pg 30 of 45]
Correction 461:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-that this minimum cover is adequate to support EV Outrigger load of 23,000lb point load anywhere on RTank; as well as HS20 loading.
[Plans C-30; Pg 30 of 45]
Correction 462:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Confirm stage-storage requirements with subasin analysis per Storm Report comments, Pg 117 of 164.
[Plans C-30; Pg 30 of 45]
Correction 463:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Confirm stage-storage requirements with subasin analysis per Storm Report comments, Pg 117 of 164.
[Plans C-30; Pg 30 of 45]
Correction 464:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Ensure available storage accounts for 6in of sediment storage per Ecology's requirements.
[Plans C-30; Pg 30 of 45]
Correction 465:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Due to high groundwater, use impermeable synthetic liner.
[Plans C-30; Pg 30 of 45]
Correction 466:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use abbreviated legal description in title.
[Plans C-32; Pg 31 of 45]
Correction 467:
See Document Markup
Comments:
NOTE: Sheet sequencing changed.
[Plans C-32; Pg 31 of 45]
Correction 468:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use abbreviated legal description in title.
[Plans C-33; Pg 32 of 45]
Correction 469:
See Document Markup
Comments:
NOTE: Sheet sequencing changed.
[Plans C-33; Pg 32 of 45]
Correction 470:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use abbreviated legal description in title.
[Plans C-34; Pg 33 of 45]
Correction 471:
See Document Markup
Comments:
NOTE: Sheet sequencing changed.
[Plans C-34; Pg 33 of 45]
Correction 472:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Due to high groundwater, specify synthetic impermeable liner.
[Plans C-34; Pg 33 of 45]
Correction 473:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use abbreviated legal description in title.
[Plans C-35; Pg 34 of 45]
Correction 474:
See Document Markup
Comments:
NOTE: Sheet sequencing changed.
[Plans C-35; Pg 34 of 45]
Correction 475:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Due to high groundwater, provide a manufactured synthetic liner to prevent groundwater intrusion into the detention facilities. Callout the synthetic liner requirements for material, installation, and protection; and show on the RTank details. In addition, provide buoyancy verification (calculations and/or certification letter).
[Plans Sht C-35; Pg 34 of 45]
Correction 476:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Confirm module layout based on the subasin analysis (stage-storage requirements) per Storm Report comments, Pg 117 of 164.
[Plans C-35; Pg 34 of 45]
Correction 477:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use abbreviated legal description in title.
[Plans C-36; Pg 35 of 45]
Correction 478:
See Document Markup
Comments:
NOTE: Sheet sequencing changed.
[Plans C-36; Pg 35 of 45]
Correction 479:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Due to high groundwater, use impermeable synthetic liner.
[Plans C-36; Pg 35 of 45]
Correction 480:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-that this minimum cover is adequate to support EV Outrigger load of 23,000lb point load anywhere on RTank; as well as HS20 loading.
[Plans C-36; Pg 35 of 45]
Correction 481:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Confirm stage-storage requirements with subasin analysis per Storm Report comments, Pg 117 of 164.
[Plans C-36; Pg 35 of 45]
Correction 482:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Ensure available storage accounts for 6in of sediment storage per Ecology's requirements.
[Plans C-36; Pg 35 of 45]
Correction 483:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-24in called out on Sht 8 of 45.
[Plans C-36; Pg 35 of 45]
Correction 484:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide the 2yr and 10yr, water surface elevations.
[Plans C-36; Pg 35 of 45]
Correction 485:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use abbreviated legal description in title.
[Plans C-37; Pg 36 of 45]
Correction 486:
See Document Markup
Comments:
NOTE: Sheet sequencing changed.
[Plans C-37; Pg 36 of 45]
Correction 487:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-that this minimum cover is adequate to support EV Outrigger load of 23,000lb point load anywhere on RTank; as well as HS20 loading.
[Plans C-37; Pg 36 of 45]
Correction 488:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Confirm stage-storage requirements with subasin analysis per Storm Report comments, Pg 117 of 164.
[Plans C-37; Pg 36 of 45]
Correction 489:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Ensure available storage accounts for 6in of sediment storage per Ecology's requirements.
[Plans C-37; Pg 36 of 45]
Correction 490:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Confirm stage-storage requirements with subasin analysis per Storm Report comments, Pg 117 of 164.
[Plans C-37; Pg 36 of 45]
Correction 491:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Due to high groundwater, use impermeable synthetic liner.
[Plans C-37; Pg 36 of 45]
Correction 492:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use abbreviated legal description in title.
[Plans C-38; Pg 37 of 45]
Correction 493:
See Document Markup
Comments:
NOTE: Sheet sequencing changed.
[Plans C-38; Pg 37 of 45]
Correction 494:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use abbreviated legal description in title.
[Plans C-39; Pg 38 of 45]
Correction 495:
See Document Markup
Comments:
NOTE: Sheet sequencing changed.
[Plans C-39; Pg 38 of 45]
Correction 496:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use abbreviated legal description in title.
[Plans C-40; Pg 39 of 45]
Correction 497:
See Document Markup
Comments:
NOTE: Sheet sequencing changed.
[Plans C-40; Pg 39 of 45]
Correction 498:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Due to high groundwater, specify synthetic impermeable liner.
[Plans C-40; Pg 39 of 45]
Correction 499:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use abbreviated legal description in title.
[Plans C-41; Pg 40 of 45]
Correction 500:
See Document Markup
Comments:
NOTE: Sheet sequencing changed.
[Plans C-41; Pg 40 of 45]
Correction 501:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Due to high groundwater, provide a manufactured synthetic liner to prevent groundwater intrusion into the detention facilities. Callout the synthetic liner requirements for material, installation, and protection; and show on the RTank details. In addition, provide buoyancy verification (calculations and/or certification letter).
[Plans Sht C-41; Pg 40 of 45]
Correction 502:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Confirm module layout based on the subasin analysis (stage-storage requirements) per Storm Report comments, Pg 117 of 164.
[Plans C-41; Pg 40 of 45]
Correction 503:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use abbreviated legal description in title.
[Plans C-42; Pg 41 of 45]
Correction 504:
See Document Markup
Comments:
NOTE: Sheet sequencing changed.
[Plans C-42; Pg 41 of 45]
Correction 505:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Due to high groundwater, use impermeable synthetic liner.
[Plans C-42; Pg 41 of 45]
Correction 506:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-that this minimum cover is adequate to support EV Outrigger load of 23,000lb point load anywhere on RTank; as well as HS20 loading.
[Plans C-42; Pg 41 of 45]
Correction 507:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Confirm stage-storage requirements with subasin analysis per Storm Report comments, Pg 117 of 164.
[Plans C-42; Pg 41 of 45]
Correction 508:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Ensure available storage accounts for 6in of sediment storage per Ecology's requirements.
[Plans C-42; Pg 41 of 45]
Correction 509:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-24in called out on Sht 10 of 45.
[Plans C-42; Pg 41 of 45]
Correction 510:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide the 2yr and 10yr, water surface elevations.
[Plans C-42; Pg 41 of 45]
Correction 511:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use abbreviated legal description in title.
[Plans C-43; Pg 42 of 45]
Correction 512:
See Document Markup
Comments:
NOTE: Sheet sequencing changed.
[Plans C-43; Pg 42 of 45]
Correction 513:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-that this minimum cover is adequate to support EV Outrigger load of 23,000lb point load anywhere on RTank; as well as HS20 loading.
[Plans C-43; Pg 42 of 45]
Correction 514:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Confirm stage-storage requirements with subasin analysis per Storm Report comments, Pg 117 of 164.
[Plans C-43; Pg 42 of 45]
Correction 515:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Ensure available storage accounts for 6in of sediment storage per Ecology's requirements.
[Plans C-43; Pg 42 of 45]
Correction 516:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Confirm stage-storage requirements with subasin analysis per Storm Report comments, Pg 117 of 164.
[Plans C-43; Pg 42 of 45]
Correction 517:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Due to high groundwater, use impermeable synthetic liner.
[Plans C-43; Pg 42 of 45]
Correction 518:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use abbreviated legal description in title.
[Plans C-44; Pg 43 of 45]
Correction 519:
See Document Markup
Comments:
NOTE: Sheet sequencing changed.
[Plans C-44; Pg 43 of 45]
Correction 520:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use abbreviated legal description in title.
[Plans C-45; Pg 44 of 45]
Correction 521:
See Document Markup
Comments:
NOTE: Sheet sequencing changed.
[Plans C-45; Pg 44 of 45]
Correction 522:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use abbreviated legal description in title.
[Plans C-46; Pg 45 of 45]
Correction 523:
See Document Markup
Comments:
NOTE: Sheet sequencing changed.
[Plans C-46; Pg 45 of 45]
Correction 524:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Due to high groundwater, specify synthetic impermeable liner.
[Plans C-46; Pg 45 of 45]
Correction 525:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show locations of the roof drain connection to the storm system.
[Plans C-9; Pg 9 of 45]
Correction 526:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide ductile iron pipe for any storm conveyance with less than 3ft of cover.
[Plans C-9; Pg 9 of 45]
Correction 527:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide utility crossing information.
[Plans C-9; Pg 9 of 45]
Correction 528:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Delineate the regulated floodplain on the plan.
[Plans C-9; Pg 9 of 45]
Correction 529:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-C7?
[Plans C-9; Pg 9 of 45]
Correction 530:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-C10?
[Plans C-9; Pg 9 of 45]
Correction 531:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout R-Tank IE.
[Plans C-9; Pg 9 of 45]
Correction 532:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Match inverts.
[Plans C-9; Pg 9 of 45]
Correction 533:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Type 2 req'd. Callout diameter. If this is to be a manhole, callout diameter and lid info.
[Plans C-9; Pg 9 of 45]
Correction 534:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify pipe slope.
[Plans C-9; Pg 9 of 45]
Correction 535:
See Document Markup
Comments:
1ft min. cover required. Revise accordingly.
[Plans C-9; Pg 9 of 45]
Correction 536:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout pipe information.
[Plans C-9; Pg 9 of 45]
Correction 537:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Type 2 req'd. Callout diameter. If this is to be a manhole, callout diameter and lid info.
[Plans C-9; Pg 9 of 45]
Correction 538:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Type 2 req'd. Callout diameter. If this is to be a manhole, callout diameter and lid info.
[Plans C-9; Pg 9 of 45]
Correction 539:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Type 2 req'd. Callout diameter. If this is to be a manhole, callout diameter and lid info.
[Plans C-9; Pg 9 of 45]
Correction 540:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Submit Traffic Signal Plans with Shaw Road frontage improvement plans along with channelization and signage.
[Signal TS-01; Sht 1 of 5]
Correction 541:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per City Standards Section 1.8 provide a landscape plan with a utility overlay (water, sewer, storm) and ensure no trees are located within 10ft of utility equipment (meters, hydrants, CBs, etc).
[Landscape L1.0; Pg 1 of 10]
Correction 542:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coordinate CSWPPP with the review comments associated with the CFG application PRGR20230972.
[CSWPPP; Pg 1 of 14]
Correction 543:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Prior to Occupancy, submit a DRAFT version of the City's Stormwater Management Facilities Agreement with an O&M manual using the maintenance activities described in the City's Stormwater Site Management Plan. The agreement shall be recorded with the Pierce County Auditors Office.
[O&M Manual; Pg 1 of 25]
Correction 544:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide R-Tank O&M information.
[O&M Manual; Pg 1 of 25]
Correction 545:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Clarify-how is this area (backslope btwn El. 74 and ROW) being conveyed to the detention system? Its not included in the bypass basin.
[Storm Report; Pg 34 of 164]
Correction 546:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Clarify-how is this area (backslope btwn El. 76 and ROW) being conveyed to the detention system? Its not included in the bypass basin.
[Plans C-5; Pg 5 of 45]
Correction 547:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Clarify-how is this area (backslope btwn El. 74 and ROW) being conveyed to the detention system? Its not part of the bypass basin contained in the storm report.
[Plans C-3; Pg 3 of 45]
Correction 548:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Clarify-how is this area (backslope btwn El. 76 and ROW) being conveyed to the detention system? Its not part of the bypass basin contained in the storm report.
[Plans C-5; Pg 5 of 45]
Correction 549:
See Document Markup
Comments:
NOTE TO ENGR: This is an existing 54in inside drop structure. If two additional pipes will enter the structure as shown, provide a plan view of the interior of the structure indicating the location of the access rungs in relation to the pipe inlets, the clearances between the drops at the inlets, and the clearances at the bottom of the structure. Ensure adequate access for maintenance. It may be better to use outside drops or revise the new sewer alignment to make the tie-in elsewhere.
[Plans C-11; Pg 11 of 45]
Fire Review
Failed
09/05/2023
07/11/2023
Reviewer:
Corrections:
Correction 1:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
1. The water plans are different then what was originally drawn on preliminary site plan. Apply previous notes to Civils. Email on 2/7/23 from Phil Becker acknowledging these requirements and provided a site plan with new layout.
2. Do not block Fire Hydrants, or F.D.C's with parking stalls. Move all blocked Fire Hydrants, and F.D.C's into parking islands.
3. All F.D.C's are required to be within 10-15' of a Fire Hydrant.
4. Provide fire turn-around dimensions and radiuses.
5. Provide all fire lane widths and radiuses. All fire lanes are required to be 26' wide.
6. Provide auto-turn analysis.
7. Provide Riser Room locations with direct access to side walk.
8. Provide Fire Lane / No Parking Sign layout with painted curbs. Temporary Fire Truck turn-around will require No Parking Signs and painted curb.
Correction 2:
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
Complete previous corrections. Items that were acknowledged in correction letter are not reflected on the plans.