Review Type
Outcome
Est. Completion Date
Completed
Public Works Collection Review
Approved
01/17/2025
01/10/2025
Reviewer:
Corrections:
Correction 1:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Remove existing 8 inch pipe (E) when new SWF is installed. No site stormwater should be discharging at this point. [civil plans, R1.1]
Correction 2:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Buried stormwater CB type I. [Civil Plans, R4.0]
Correction 3:
See Document Markup
Comments:
No maintenance access to connection with existing culvert. [Civil Plans, R4.0]
Correction 4:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Stormwater pipe diameter in RoW is 12 inches minimum and should have a trash rack or other applicable device at outlet. [Civil Plans, R4.0]
Planning Review
Failed
01/17/2025
01/09/2025
Reviewer:
Corrections:
Correction 1:
Miscellaneous Planning Correction
Comments:
SEPA: Provide plans to meet SEPA conditions regarding safe routes to schools. SEPA mitigation measures require implementation of a requirement for off-site safe routes to schools improvements. See P-21-0034 SEPA (June 27, 2023). Please provide those plans for further review and agency consultation. 01/09/25 UPDATED NOTES: Its unclear if the applicant has addressed this comment in the current plans to the satisfaction of the city Traffic Engineer. Please provide a detailed, written response upon resubmittal. The resubmittal response document addressed mark ups only.
Public Works Water Review
Approved
01/17/2025
01/08/2025
Reviewer:
Fire Review
Approved
01/17/2025
12/30/2024
Reviewer:
Engineering Civil Review
Failed
06/20/2024
07/09/2024
Reviewer:
Corrections:
Correction 1:
See Document Markup
Comments:
There's also a much larger tributary basin east of the project site which also contributes flows to the roadside channel along Pioneer.
[Storm Report; Pg 7 of 207]
Correction 2:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Please add "currently being" here.
[Storm Report; Pg 7 of 207]
Correction 3:
See Document Markup
Comments:
"passes through multiple culverts along the property frontage before being split into two separate piped systems which ultimately discharge to the roadside channel on the north side of Pioneer. The first piped system consists of two pipes adjacent to each other, 12in and 18in ductilie iron, which crosses Pioneer just east of the intersection. The CB's connected to these pipes are located within the travel lane with the CB connected to the 18in pipe currently buried under pavement. The other CB is visible with a solid lid. The second pipe system crosses Shaw Road westerly before turning northwest in a buried structure and discharging to the Pioneer north channel on the west side of Shaw Road."
[Storm Report; Pg 7 of 207]
Correction 4:
See Document Markup
Comments:
"Deer Creek and"
[Storm Report; Pg 7 of 207]
Correction 5:
See Document Markup
Comments:
"the southside of "
[Storm Report; Pg 7 of 207]
Correction 6:
See Document Markup
Comments:
The road runoff along Pioneer discharges to a fish bearing stream so Enhanced Treatement is required. Revise the Pioneer water quality features (media filter and bioswale) accordingly.
[Storm Report; Pg 7 of 207]
Correction 7:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Enhanced treatment required. Revise accordingly.
[Storm Report; Pg 7 of 207]
Correction 8:
See Document Markup
Comments:
See comments under Section 2.2 and revise accordingly.
[Storm Report; Pg 8 of 207]
Correction 9:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Please add "existing wetpond constructed during the Shaw Road CIP".
[Storm Report; Pg 8 of 207]
Correction 10:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Enhanced Treatment required.
[Storm Report; Pg 9 of 207]
Correction 11:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use O&M BMPs from the City's 'Site Management Plan for Stormwater Operations and Maintenance, Appendix A'.
[Storm Report; Pg 9 of 207]
Correction 12:
See Document Markup
Comments:
O&M within the ROW is the responsibility of the City.
[Storm Report; Pg 9 of 207]
Correction 13:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-it appears that portions of the frontage improvements, WQ swale, and stream are located in the regulated floodplain per the LOMR dated September 8, 2022. Once confirmed, provide compensatory storage calculations to confirm that the floodplain storage has not been reduced and certify that the work within the floodplain complies with PMC 21.07.
[Storm Report; Pg 10 of 207]
Correction 14:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add WDFW HPA.
[Storm Report; Pg 10 of 207]
Correction 15:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Enhanced Treatment required.
[Storm Report; Pg 15 of 207]
Correction 16:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Use O&M BMPs from the City's 'Site Management Plan for Stormwater Operations and Maintenance, Appendix A'.
[Storm Report; Pg 179 of 207]
Correction 17:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per City Stds 204.5 provide supporting calculation(s) for the sizing of the culvert to convey the 100-yr storm event for the associated tributary basin.
[Storm Report; Pg 193 of 207]
Correction 18:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Due to the configuration of the Contech Stormfilter CB, the location of the outlet places the CB perpendicular to the curbline and into the travel lane. City Standards 204.8(11) does not allow solid square lids in the travel lane. Either replace the proprietary square lid with round lids or provide an alternative device (see Old Castle Perk Filter as an example).
[Storm Report; Pg 194 of 207]
Correction 19:
See Document Markup
Comments:
If the proposed biofiltration swale is to be used as part of Enhanced Treatment, then provide a 'stability check' per Ecology reqts.
[Storm Report; Pg 206 of 207]
Correction 20:
See Document Markup
Comments:
The road runoff along Pioneer discharges to a fish bearing stream so Enhanced Treatement is required. Revise the Pioneer water quality features (media filter and bioswale) accordingly.
[Storm Report; Pg 206 of 207]
Correction 21:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide DRAFT ROW dedication deed along Pioneer Way frontage, including sketch, on City Form. 34ft road width from centerline, 10ft planter, and 8ft sidewalk. Once approved, record with the Pierce County Auditor.
[Plans; Sht R0.0 of 21]
Correction 22:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Please remove Notes 2 and 5 (not relevant to this permit application).
[Plans; Sht R0.0 of 21]
Correction 23:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Revise floodplain delineation based on approved LOMR.
[Plans; Sht R0.0 of 21]
Correction 24:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Revise per comments on Sht R6.3.
[Plans; Sht 1 of 21]
Correction 25:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add the following notes to the planset:?????????? ?????? ????????? ???? ??? ?? ???????? ???? ???????? ???????? ???????????? ????? ?? ????????? ?? ????????? ?? ???? ??? ?????????? ????? ?????? ??? ??????? ?????????????
•Existing private utilities (power, gas, telcom, cable, etc…) that are in conflict with City maintained right-of-way and utilities shall be relocated outside of the travelled road section, i.e., behind the curb under the sidewalk area or other location as approved by the City. ??????? ??? ?? ?? ???
Correction 26:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add the following notes to the planset:?????????? ?????? ????????? ???? ??? ?? ???????? ???? ???????? ???????? ???????????? ????? ?? ????????? ?? ????????? ?? ???? ??? ?????????? ????? ?????? ??? ??????? ?????????????
•Existing private utilities (power, gas, telcom, cable, etc…) that are in conflict with City maintained right-of-way and utilities shall be relocated outside of the travelled road section, i.e., behind the curb under the sidewalk area or other location as approved by the City. ??????? ??? ?? ?? ???
Correction 27:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Clarify what is happening with existing sidewalk, ramps, and utilities.
[Plans; Sht R1.1 of 21]
Correction 28:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide Type III Barricade per CS 01.02.20.
[Plans; Sht R2.0 of 21]
Correction 29:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Revise-see shared use path x-section.
[Plans; Sht R2.0 of 21]
Correction 30:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add-"Permit PRCCP20230970".
[Plans; Sht R2.0 of 21]
Correction 31:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify leader location.
[Plans; Sht R2.0 of 21]
Correction 32:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide spot elevations at corners of ramps and landing and at the corners where the DWS meets the flowline.
[Plans; Sht R2.0 of 21]
Correction 33:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide the following information for the approach:
-Centerline stationing
-curb radii, curve length, and delta angle
-flowline elevations at PC, PT, and 1/4-points of radius
-Drive aisle width at throat
[Plans; Sht R2.0 of 21]
Correction 34:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide valley gutter flowline elevations at each end and 50ft oc.
[Plans; Sht R2.0 of 21]
Correction 35:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide easement right or dedicate ROW to the City for ADA ramp and signal
[Plans; Sht R2.0 of 21]
Correction 36:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide spot elevations at corners of the ramp and landing and at the corners where the DWS meets the flowline.
[Plans; Sht R2.0 of 21]
Correction 37:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show shared use path transition to ADA ramp. Provide non-hardscape area adjacent to ramp pedestrian curbs.
[Plans; Sht R2.0 of 21]
Correction 38:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Transition shared use path to ADA ramp.
[Plans; Sht R2.0 of 21]
Correction 39:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add note that shared use path to be pervious pavement per details/ on Sheets R6.3 and R6.5, but ADA ramps to be convential concrete pavement.
[Plans; Sht R2.0 of 21]
Correction 40:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show steet light locations along frontage.
[Plans; Sht R2.0 of 21]
Correction 41:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout min. 3ft clear btwn face of pole and face of curb. Relocate if necessary.
[Plans; Sht R2.0 of 21]
Correction 42:
See Document Markup
Comments:
See comment on 4/R6.2.
[Plans; Sht R2.1 of 21]
Correction 43:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide spot elevations at corners of ramps and landing and at the corners where the DWS meets the flowline.
[Plans; Sht R2.1 of 21]
Correction 44:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide the following information for the approach:
-Centerline stationing
-curb radii, curve length, and delta angle
-flowline elevations at PC, PT, and 1/4-points of radius
-Drive aisle width at throat
[Plans; Sht R2.1 of 21]
Correction 45:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide easement right or dedicate ROW to the City for ADA ramp located outside ROW.
[Plans; Sht R2.1 of 21]
Correction 46:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add-"Permit PRCCP20230970".
[Plans; Sht R2.1 of 21]
Correction 47:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Revise-see shared use path x-section.
[Plans; Sht R2.1 of 21]
Correction 48:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show shared use path transition to ADA ramp. Provide non-hardscape area adjacent to ramp pedestrian curbs.
[Plans; Sht R2.1 of 21]
Correction 49:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout to transition shared use path to 8ft sidewalk. Ensure that any areas of the shared use path that butt to the high side of a pedestrian curb are not hardscape (hardscape creates potential tripping hazards.)
[Plans; Sht R2.1 of 21]
Correction 50:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Existing ADA ramps are non-compliant (cross-slopes, ramp lengths, etc.) and must be replaced. Adjust/relocate existing utilities which are in conflict with revised curb ramp designs. Provide detail(s) of proposed ramps with spot elevations at the corners of ramps, landings, and at the corners where the DWS meets the flowline.
[Plans; Sht R2.1 of 21]
Correction 51:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout proposed ROW radius.
[Plans; Sht R2.1 of 21]
Correction 52:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout contour elevations adjacent to the corner.
[Plans; Sht R2.1 of 21]
Correction 53:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Relocate proposed pedestrian curb to back of walk.
[Plans; Sht R2.1 of 21]
Correction 54:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Remove and replace existing non-standard sidewalk.
[Plans; Sht R2.1 of 21]
Correction 55:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Transition shared use path to ADA ramp.
[Plans; Sht R2.1 of 21]
Correction 56:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add note that shared use path to be pervious pavement per details/ on Sheets R6.3 and R6.5, but ADA ramps to be convential concrete pavement.
[Plans; Sht R2.1 of 21]
Correction 57:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show steet light locations along frontage.
[Plans; Sht R2.1 of 21]
Correction 58:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Relocate existing steet light to provide min. 24" clear from face of curb.
[Plans; Sht R2.1 of 21]
Correction 59:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Clarify-Keynote 4 is also being used for existing light standard and j-boxes at the intersection.
[Plans; Sht R3.0 of 21]
Correction 60:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add the following notes to the planset:?????????? ?????? ????????? ???? ??? ?? ???????? ???? ???????? ???????? ???????????? ????? ?? ????????? ?? ????????? ?? ???? ??? ?????????? ????? ?????? ??? ??????? ?????????????
•Existing private utilities (power, gas, telcom, cable, etc…) that are in conflict with City maintained right-of-way and utilities shall be relocated outside of the travelled road section, i.e., behind the curb under the sidewalk area or other location as approved by the City. ??????? ??? ??? ?? ???
Correction 61:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout watermain to be removed per Civil Permit PRCCP20230970.
[Plans; Sht R3.0 of 21]
Correction 62:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Jboxes to be relocated due to ADA ramp replacements.
[Plans; Sht R3.0 of 21]
Correction 63:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add the following notes to the planset:?????????? ?????? ????????? ???? ??? ?? ???????? ???? ???????? ???????? ???????????? ????? ?? ????????? ?? ????????? ?? ???? ??? ?????????? ????? ?????? ??? ??????? ?????????????
•Existing private utilities (power, gas, telcom, cable, etc…) that are in conflict with City maintained right-of-way and utilities shall be relocated outside of the travelled road section, i.e., behind the curb under the sidewalk area or other location as approved by the City. ??????? ??? ??? ?? ???
Correction 64:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify "Note 4" reference.
[Plans; Sht R3.1 of 21]
Correction 65:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Indicate and callout regulated floodplain. Provide compensatory storage calculations to confirm that the floodplain storage has not been reduced and certify that the work within the floodplain complies with PMC 21.07.
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 21]
Correction 66:
See Document Markup
Comments:
The proposed biofiltration swale only provides Basic Treatment. Enhanced Treatment is required due to discharge to the regulated stream. Revise WQ design accordingly.
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 21]
Correction 67:
See Document Markup
Comments:
City Standards require a storm main at curbline. Any deviation from the standard will require review and approval of the City Engineer via the AMR process.
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 21]
Correction 68:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Identify elevation callouts.
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 21]
Correction 69:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Wall to be located outside of ROW on private property.
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 21]
Correction 70:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout contour elevations.
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 21]
Correction 71:
See Document Markup
Comments:
See comment Sheet R6.2.
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 21]
Correction 72:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Revise culvert length per HPA permit.
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 21]
Correction 73:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Revise culvert length per HPA permit.
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 21]
Correction 74:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout rip-rap pad dimensions and thickness-if part of final design.
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 21]
Correction 75:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show existing buried CB adjacent to CB D4-10697.
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 21]
Correction 76:
See Document Markup
Comments:
See comment Sheet R6.2.
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 21]
Correction 77:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Revise for Enhanced Treatment.
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 21]
Correction 78:
See Document Markup
Comments:
In an effort to remove the culvert outside of the road section as well as tie-in a new storm main serving Pioneer Way and a future extension beyond the project limits; place a new CB at the existing culvert end with a storm main eastward and stub a new pipe out the back for the connection to the culvert.
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 21]
Correction 79:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show maintenance access per comments on 2/R6.2.
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 21]
Correction 80:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide debris screen at culvert entrance. Bars to be spaced approximately 12in oc.
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 21]
Correction 81:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Revise per final design.
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 21]
Correction 82:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout TW/BW elevations.
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 21]
Correction 83:
See Document Markup
Comments:
See City Stds 204.3 for storm pipe sizing criteria.
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 21]
Correction 84:
See Document Markup
Comments:
See City Stds 204.8 for maximum gutter run.
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 21]
Correction 85:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide flowline elevations at 50ft oc.
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 21]
Correction 86:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout proposed ROW radius.
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 21]
Correction 87:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Sawcut existing pavement to nearest proposed northerly lane line. Provide full depth road section per City Standard Detail 01.01.19 with cross-slope noted on plan at 100ft intervals (max). Maintain x-slope btwn 2% and 5%.
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 21]
Correction 88:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Buried stormwater structure-raise to grade and provide ring and cover.
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 21]
Correction 89:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Grind and overlay existing lane beyond sawcut to match new full-depth road section.
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 21]
Correction 90:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show steet light locations along frontage.
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 21]
Correction 91:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide CB with stub to the east for future connection. Plug stub end.
[Plans; Sht R4.1 of 21]
Correction 92:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide the following information for the approach:
-Centerline stationing
-curb radii, curve length, and delta angle
-flowline elevations at PC, PT, and 1/4-points of radius
-Drive aisle width at throat
[Plans; Sht R4.1 of 21]
Correction 93:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Walls are not allowed within the ROW without an approved AMR. If the walls cannot be eliminated, submit an AMR for City Engineer review and approval.
[Plans; Sht R4.1 of 21]
Correction 94:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide callout. Ensure relocated pole is within future planter strip.
[Plans; Sht R4.1 of 21]
Correction 95:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide detail of ADA ramp with spot elevations at corners of the ramp and landing and at the corners where the DWS meets the flowline.
[Plans; Sht R4.1 of 21]
Correction 96:
See Document Markup
Comments:
See City Stds 204.8 for maximum gutter run.
[Plans; Sht R4.1 of 21]
Correction 97:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide valley gutter flowline elevations at each end and 50ft oc.
[Plans; Sht R4.1 of 21]
Correction 98:
See Document Markup
Comments:
See comments Sht R4.0.
[Plans; Sht R4.1 of 21]
Correction 99:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Identify elevation callouts.
[Plans; Sht R4.1 of 21]
Correction 100:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide flowline elevations at 50ft oc.
[Plans; Sht R4.1 of 21]
Correction 101:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout and show existing EP btwn 51+00 and 53+00.
[Plans; Sht R4.1 of 21]
Correction 102:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Is this a new headwall? Clarify work to be done to tie proposed stream to existing culvert end.
[Plans; Sht R4.1 of 21]
Correction 103:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Sawcut existing pavement to nearest proposed lane line. Provide full depth road section per City Standard Detail 01.01.19 with cross-slope noted on plan at 100ft intervals (max). Maintain x-slope btwn 2% and 5%.
[Plans; Sht R4.1 of 21]
Correction 104:
See Document Markup
Comments:
End full-depth road section.
[Plans; Sht R4.1 of 21]
Correction 105:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout contour elevations.
[Plans; Sht R4.1 of 21]
Correction 106:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Grind and overlay existing lane beyond sawcut to match new full-depth road section.
[Plans; Sht R4.1 of 21]
Correction 107:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide ADA ramp for future tie-in of sidewalk. Provide detail of ADA ramp with spot elevations at corners of the ramp and landing and at the corners where the DWS meets the flowline.
[Plans; Sht R4.1 of 21]
Correction 108:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show steet light locations along frontage.
[Plans; Sht R4.1 of 21]
Correction 109:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide stiping info for the approach.
[Plans; Sht R5.0 of 21]
Correction 110:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Prior to Occupancy, execute and record “Private Road Maintenance Agreement” (for maintenance of private striping within the ROW) on form approved by the City Attorney. ??????? ??? ??? ?? ??
Correction 111:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Remove reference to Pierce County standard.
[Plans; Sht R6.1 of 21]
Correction 112:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Notes 13 and 14 aren't applicable to this project.
[Plans; Sht R6.1 of 21]
Correction 113:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Examples of curb ramp designs with spot elevations...reference comments on frontage plans.
[Plans; Sht R6.1 of 21]
Correction 114:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout the following information for the WQ swale:
-grass seed mix criteria
-thickness of amended soil
-amended soil composition criteria
-filter fabric wrap reqts.
-drain rock thickness above/below underdrain
-indicate groundwater elev (El. 69.84) in relation to the x-section
-indicate synthetic impermeable liner and provide criteria
[Plans; Sht R6.2 of 21]
Correction 115:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Confirm 5/8" minus per Ecology.
[Plans; Sht R6.2 of 21]
Correction 116:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout grass on the side slopes.
[Plans; Sht R6.2 of 21]
Correction 117:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Curb cut cannot be allowed on Pioneer due to traffic volume and speed. In the past, the City has approved for use the Neenah Foundry Curb Box R-3165. If this through-curb inlet works for the proposed design it can be incorporated into the planset. Other alternatives would likely require discussion and approval using the Alternative Methods Request (AMR) process.
[Plans; Sht R6.2 of 21]
Correction 118:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Enhanced Treatment required for Pioneer. The comments below are provided in case the biofiltration swale will still be utilized as part of a treatment train.
[Plans; Sht R6.2 of 21]
Correction 119:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Due to the configuration of the Contech Stormfilter CB, the location of the outlet places the CB perpendicular to the curbline and into the travel lane. City Standards 204.8(11) does not allow solid square lids in the travel lane. Either replace the proprietary square lid with round lids or provide an alternative device (see Old Castle Perk Filter as an example).
[Plans; Sht R6.2 of 21]
Correction 120:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add-HPA culvert cross-sections to the planset.
[PH2 CFG Plans; Sht C1.00]
Correction 121:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide CIP or prefab end wall. If CIP call out reinforcting req'ts. (See example above as one possible alternative).
[Plans; Sht R6.2 of 21]
Correction 122:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide maintenance access above pipe-culvert tie-in. (See example above as on possible alternative).
[Plans; Sht R6.2 of 21]
Correction 123:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify-HPA culvert details indicate 2ft tall interior height.
[Plans; Sht R6.2 of 21]
Correction 124:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout and show 12in min. shoulder per Standards.
[Plans; Sht R6.3 of 21]
Correction 125:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Locate ROW at back of walk per standards.
[Plans; Sht R6.3 of 21]
Correction 126:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Revise to reflect Shared Use Path design...see right.
[Plans; Sht R6.3 of 21]
Correction 127:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Revise-Existing ROW varies from 65' to 90' btwn 9+20 to 11+76, and varies from 93' to 99' btwn 13+26 to 15+90.
[Plans; Sht R6.3 of 21]
Correction 128:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add- "17ft".
[Plans; Sht R6.3 of 21]
Correction 129:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Revise-Existing ROW varies from 90' to 93' btwn 11+76 to 13+26.
[Plans; Sht R6.3 of 21]
Correction 130:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Revise-Existing dim'n is 30' 11+76 to 13+20; 33' 13+20 to 13+26.
[Plans; Sht R6.3 of 21]
Correction 131:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add- "17ft".
[Plans; Sht R6.3 of 21]
Correction 132:
See Document Markup
Comments:
3ft per CS 01.02.19.
[Plans; Sht R6.3 of 21]
Correction 133:
See Document Markup
Comments:
ROW varies btwn Sta 45+00 and Sta 48+75. See AFN 9408230215 and revise accordingly.
[Plans; Sht R6.3 of 21]
Correction 134:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide 34ft curb to CL.
[Plans; Sht R6.3]
Correction 135:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Determine proposed ROW dedication using 34ft btwn curb and centerline and callout dimension on the x-section.
[Plans; Sht R6.3 of 21]
Correction 136:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide 34ft curb to CL.
[Plans; Sht R6.3]
Correction 137:
See Document Markup
Comments:
See comments on Detail 1 above.
[Plans; Sht R6.3 of 21]
Correction 138:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Revise lane dimensioning for 34ft cross-section.
[Plans; Sht R6.3 of 21]
Correction 139:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Revise lane dimensioning for 34ft cross-section.
[Plans; Sht R6.3 of 21]
Correction 140:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add "pervious".
[Plans; Sht R6.3 of 21]
Correction 141:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add City Std Details:
01.01.05 // 01.01.11 // 01.01.18 // 01.02.02 (strike Note 7 due to pervious concrete) // 01.02.03 // 01.02.08a // 01.02.16 // 01.02.19 // 01.02.20 // 01.03.06 // 01.03.13 // 01.03.14 // 01.03.15 // 01.04.01 // 01.04.02
Correction 142:
See Document Markup
Comments:
3ft per CS 01.02.19.
[Plans; Sht R6.5 of 21]
Correction 143:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Revise per Shared Use Path comments (Sht R6.3) and Planning Dept comments.
[Plans; Sht R7.0 of 21]
Correction 144:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Callout plantings per Planning Dept criteria. Callout root barriers for any trees planted within the ROW.
[Plans; Sht R7.0 of 21]
Correction 145:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add the following to Note 6:????? ? ???? ?? ??? ???? ???????????? ????? ?? ???????? ?? ??? ?????? ?????? ?????????? ????? ?? ??????????????
-“6b. Contractor shall contact the City’s signal technician when the lights are ready to be energized.”??????? ??? ??? ?? ??
Correction 146:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify Sch. 80 PVC conduit at approach. Replace if necessary.
[Plans; Sht SL.1 of 21]
Correction 147:
See Document Markup
Comments:
If underground conduit at new approach, confirm Sch. 80 PVC conduit or replace if necessary.
[Plans; Sht SL.1 of 21]
Correction 148:
See Document Markup
Comments:
At proposed City light standard locations, encapsulate the light base into the sidewalk and/or shared use path pour.
[Plans; Sht SL.1 of 21]
Correction 149:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Grind and Overlay one lane width.
[Plans; Sht R2.1 of 21]
Correction 150:
See Document Markup
Comments:
See comments on Sht R6.2.
[Plans; Sht R6.3 of 21]
Correction 151:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Full depth road section per City Standard 01.01.05.
[Plans; Sht R6.3 of 21]
Correction 152:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Full depth road section per City Standard 01.01.05.
[Plans; Sht R6.3 of 21]
Correction 153:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coordinate paving section with comments on Sht R4.0 and R4.1.
[Plans; Sht R6.3 of 21]
Correction 154:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coordinate paving section with comments on Sht R4.0 and R4.1.
[Plans; Sht R6.3 of 21]
Correction 155:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Indicate and callout regulated floodplain. Provide compensatory storage calculations to confirm that the floodplain storage has not been reduced and certify that the work within the floodplain complies with PMC 21.07.
[Plans; Sht R4.1 of 21]
Correction 156:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Maintain curb and gutter alignment along Pioneer to east property line.
[Plans; Sht R4.1 of 21]
Correction 157:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add the following notes to the planset:
-Existing public utilities that are in conflict with proposed frontage improvements shall be relocated as necessary to meet all applicable City, State, and Federal requirements.
-Existing private utilities (power, gas, telcom, cable, etc...) that are in conflict with City maintained right-of way and utilities shall be relocated outside of the travelled road section, i.e., behind the curb under the sidewalk area or other location as approved by the City.
[Plans; Sht R1.0 of 21]
Correction 158:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add the following notes to the planset:
-Existing public utilities that are in conflict with proposed frontage improvements shall be relocated as necessary to meet all applicable City, State, and Federal requirements.
-Existing private utilities (power, gas, telcom, cable, etc...) that are in conflict with City maintained right-of way and utilities shall be relocated outside of the travelled road section, i.e., behind the curb under the sidewalk area or other location as approved by the City.
[Plans; Sht R1.1 of 21]
Correction 159:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add the following notes to the planset:
-Existing public utilities that are in conflict with proposed frontage improvements shall be relocated as necessary to meet all applicable City, State, and Federal requirements.
-Existing private utilities (power, gas, telcom, cable, etc...) that are in conflict with City maintained right-of way and utilities shall be relocated outside of the travelled road section, i.e., behind the curb under the sidewalk area or other location as approved by the City.
[Plans; Sht R3.0 of 21]
Correction 160:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add the following notes to the planset:
-Existing public utilities that are in conflict with proposed frontage improvements shall be relocated as necessary to meet all applicable City, State, and Federal requirements.
-Existing private utilities (power, gas, telcom, cable, etc...) that are in conflict with City maintained right-of way and utilities shall be relocated outside of the travelled road section, i.e., behind the curb under the sidewalk area or other location as approved by the City.
[Plans; Sht R3.1 of 21]
Correction 161:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Prior to Occupancy, execute and record "Private Road Maintenance Agreement" (for maintenance of private striping within the ROW) on form approved by the City Attorney.
[Plans; Sht R5.0 of 21]
Correction 162:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add the following to Note 6:
-"6a. A copy of the load calculations shall be provided to the City's signal technician prior to installation.
-"6b. Contractor shall contact the City's signal technician when the lights are ready to be energized."
[Plans; Sht SL.1 of 21]
Correction 163:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Add City Std Details:
02.01.05 // 06.01.01 // 06.01.02
[Plans; Sht R6.2 of 21]
Engineering Traffic Review
Failed
06/20/2024
07/03/2024
Reviewer:
Corrections:
Correction 1:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Remove thermoplastic STOP bar from gutter pan.
PM-01
Correction 2:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Jason Rogge
253-841-5471
PM-01
Correction 3:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Adjust east/west lane striping to accommodate left turn pocket and shared thru/right turn lane. Shift driveway as needed to align NB/SB left turn pockets.
PM-01
Correction 4:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Remove right turn arrow
Intersection must be channelized with left turn pocket & shared thru/right pocket.
PM-01
Correction 5:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Remove right turn arrow
Intersection must be channelized with left turn pocket & shared thru/right pocket.
PM-01
Correction 6:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Signal plans need to be included in civil plan set.
PM-01
Correction 7:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Replace with City standard left turn arrow w/ ONLY thermoplastic.
PM-01
Correction 8:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Replace with City standard left turn arrow w/ ONLY thermoplastic.
PM-01
Correction 9:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Shift driveway as needed to align NB/SB left turn pockets.
PM-01
Correction 10:
See Document Markup
Comments:
remain and point to southern leg of this intersection.
PM-01
Correction 11:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Should Remain
PM-01
Correction 12:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Bike Lane sign? W16-9P?
PM-01
Correction 13:
See Document Markup
Comments:
W16-9P?
PM-01
Correction 14:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Why remove this sign?
PM-01
Correction 15:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Should remain
PM-01
Correction 16:
See Document Markup
Comments:
RSSZ flasher
-Coordinate with the City for required hardware & wireless interconnect
-Show condiut/j-box/power source/etc.
-How did the design team determine placement? 300ft from school property would place beacon within signalized intersection.
-Reference applicable WAC with placement/design justification.
-MUTCD compliant advanced signage/pavement markings missing from design
TS-01
Correction 17:
See Document Markup
Comments:
RSSZ flasher
-Coordinate with the City for required hardware & wireless interconnect
-Show condiut/j-box/power source/etc.
-Reference applicable WAC with placement/design justification.
-MUTCD compliant advanced signage/pavement markings missing from design
TS-01
Correction 18:
See Document Markup
Comments:
As condition with the preliminary site plan approval, the required signal/intersection modifications must be fully configured and operational no less than 2 weeks prior to receiving occupancy for any building on-site. Adaptive signal contractor (Rhythm Engineering) will be required to configure the adaptive system on-site. Adaptive contractor will provide setup/configuration/optimization (not completed by the City). Place this condition on the plans.
TS-01
Correction 19:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per the approved preliminary site plan conditions, provide details on overhead fiber connection and how it will be spliced/connected to cabinet.
TS-01
Correction 20:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Electronic blank out sign not necessary here. During a the phase 4 ped movement, WBL drivers will not be allowed to make a permissive left turn across the crosswalk. Update phasing/coding accordingly. Electronic blank out sign necessary for SB approach (southbound right turning vehicles) Incorporate into design.
TS-01
Correction 21:
See Document Markup
Comments:
As condition with the preliminary site plan approval, Flashing yellow arrows with PT/PM phasing required required for EB/WB left turns. Modify phasing as needed
TS-01
Correction 22:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Adjust east/west lane striping to accommodate left turn pocket and shared thru/right turn lane. To accommodate this phasing, the EBR overlap must be removed
TS-01
Correction 23:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Adjust east/west lane striping to accommodate left turn pocket and shared thru/right turn lane. Shift driveway as needed to align NB/SB left turn pockets.
TS-01
Correction 24:
See Document Markup
Comments:
To accommodate required channelization (left turn pocket and shared thru/right turn lane), EBR overlap must be removed
TS-01
Correction 25:
See Document Markup
Comments:
FYA signal head
TS-01
Correction 26:
See Document Markup
Comments:
FYA signal head
TS-01
Correction 27:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Does not appear to be ADA compliant (greater than 10ft from curb)
TS-01
Correction 28:
See Document Markup
Comments:
this should be installed on both sides of Shaw Rd (north leg) as there is no crosswalk on north side. Use the appropriate R9-3B signs to direct pedestrians to the south leg crosswalk.
TS-01
Correction 29:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Remove
TS-01
Correction 30:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coordinate with the City on the size/type/model number of electronic blank out sign.
TS-01
Correction 31:
See Document Markup
Comments:
J-box over capacity
TS-01
Correction 32:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Missing EVPE for this leg.
TS-01
Correction 33:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Swapped?
TS-01
Correction 34:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Move j-boxes outside of sidewalk
TS-01
Correction 35:
See Document Markup
Comments:
R9-3 combo should be installed on both sides of Shaw Rd (north leg)
TS-01
Correction 36:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Why is there 2-2" here and only 1-2" in Wire note #10?
TS-01
Correction 37:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Missing wire note for required fiber connection to signal cabinet.
TS-01
Correction 38:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Missing wire note
TS-01
Correction 39:
See Document Markup
Comments:
It appears this equipment is not located within ROW
Correction 40:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Update phasing digram to reflect PT/PM FYA operation for EB/WB.
TS-01
Correction 41:
See Document Markup
Comments:
WBL permissive not allowed during phase 4 ped movement. Show this configuration.
TS-01
Correction 42:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Overhead communication lines will block signal head visibility. Contractor is responsible to raise utility lines as needed. Place note on plans.
TS-01
Correction 43:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Coordinate with the City of Puyallup for the required Campbell APS unit
TS-01
Correction 44:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Type PS pole receiving Type PS pole?
Correction 45:
See Document Markup
Comments:
No spares?
Correction 46:
See Document Markup
Comments:
existing
Correction 47:
See Document Markup
Comments:
missing from plan
Correction 48:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Evpe B and D?
Correction 49:
See Document Markup
Comments:
A?
Correction 50:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Swapped?
Correction 51:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify new signage is included for new wind area loading
TS-04
Correction 52:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Update based PT/PM FYA phasing, FYA signage, etc.
TS-04
Correction 53:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Update based PT/PM FYA phasing, FYA signage, overlap removal, electronic blank-out sign, etc.
TS-04
Correction 54:
See Document Markup
Comments:
ADA ramp design and location does not match signal design.
Civil Plans - R2.0
Correction 55:
See Document Markup
Comments:
For WBR movement, provide ESD sight lines to ensure right on-red movements have adequate sight distance
Civil Plans - R2.0
Correction 56:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Shared use path design not consistent with provided in signal design or previously constructed sections on Shaw Rd.
Civil Plans - R2.0
Correction 57:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Utility pole must be relocated farther from intersection. Must be minimum 3ft between face of curb and face of pole
Civil Plans - R2.0
Correction 58:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Updated pavement markings for EB approach missing
Civil Plans - R2.0
Correction 59:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show locations of City standard streetlights on frontage
Civil Plans - R2.0
Correction 60:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide detailed cost estimate for the Shaw Rd frontage improvements only. Applicant will receive a traffic impact fee credit for the cost to construct frontage on Shaw Rd.
Civil Plans - R2.1
Correction 61:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Remove junction boxes from sidewalk. Replace existing ADA ramps at signal (does not meet City standards)
Civil Plans - R2.1
Correction 62:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show locations of City standard streetlights on frontage
Civil Plans - R2.0
Correction 63:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Future location must not interfere with future frontage improvements. PSE mounted streetlight to be removed. Lighting to be replaced by City standard lighting.
Civil Plans - R3.1
Correction 64:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Fix abrupt vertical curb alignment
Civil Plans - R4.0
Correction 65:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per the approved preliminary site plan conditions, the City will require more information regarding the E Pioneer curb alignment. Show additional curb alignment on the west side of Shaw/Pioneer signal (Pioneer Crossing frontage).
Civil Plans - R4.0
Correction 66:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Proposed ROW dedication too large. Only dedicate to back of sidewalk
Civil Plans - R4.0
Correction 67:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Proposed voids in vertical curb is not allowed. Must propose a design alternative that provides a continuous vertical curb along arterial segment.
Civil Plans - R4.0
Correction 68:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify face of curb alignment matches Pioneer Crossing development.
Civil Plans - R4.0
Correction 69:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show locations of City standard streetlights on frontage
Civil Plans - R4.0
Correction 70:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Extend curb gutter and roadway widening to edge of ROW ~ STA 51+25. Curb identified in red
Civil Plans - R4.1
Correction 71:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per the approved preliminary site plan conditions, at the discretion of the City, the City may restrict outbound left turns from the E Pioneer access in the future. At the request of the City, the Owners, Heirs, Successors and Assigns agree to renovate and/or improve the driveway access in accordance with the City of Puyallup Municipal Code and Engineering Standards.” Place this note on these plans
Civil Plans - R4.1
Correction 72:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per the approved preliminary site plan conditions, during civil design a detailed sight distance analysis will be required at the E Pioneer driveway per City Standards. ESD of 415ft is required at this driveway. Assume 14.5ft setback from the E Pioneer curb alignment and 3.5ft driver eye height.
Civil Plans - R4.1
Correction 73:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Type 3 object marker (OM-3R) per COP 01.03.13
Civil Plans - R4.1
Correction 74:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Start fog line straight taper
STA 50+43.85, 23.00ft RT
Civil Plans - R4.1
Correction 75:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Taper markings per COP 01.03.13
Civil Plans - R4.1
Correction 76:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Start Double yellow CL
STA 50+43.85, 12.00ft RT
Civil Plans - R4.1
Correction 77:
See Document Markup
Comments:
provide 3ft paved shoulder behind fog line
Civil Plans - R4.1
Correction 78:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show EB right turn pocket.
Civil Plans - R4.1
Correction 79:
See Document Markup
Comments:
connect fog line into existing
Civil Plans - R4.1
Correction 80:
See Document Markup
Comments:
relocate utility pole outside of future sidewalk alignment
Civil Plans - R4.1
Correction 81:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide ADA compliant wheelchair ramp. Not required to extend sidewalk east of the driveway.
Civil Plans - R4.1
Correction 82:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Remove walls from ROW. Locations will conflict from future sidewalk/planter strip alignment. Place ESD sight lines on plans to ensure there's no conflict
Civil Plans - R4.1
Correction 83:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Remove walls from ROW. Will interfere with future sidewalk/planter strip alignment
Civil Plans - R4.1
Correction 84:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide fog line radius to guide vehicles to tapered vehicle path.
Civil Plans - R4.1
Correction 85:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show locations of City standard streetlights on frontage
Civil Plans - R4.1
Correction 86:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per the approved preliminary site plan conditions, striping/pavement marking modifications required at Shaw/Pioneer signal. With proposed improvements, EB approach will allow two lanes thru.
Civil Plans - R5.0
Correction 87:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Remove curvature
Civil Plans - R5.0
Correction 88:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Turn pocket markings do not meet City standards. New thermoplastic pavement markings required
Civil Plan - R5.0
Correction 89:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Two EB lane striping not provided
Civil Plans - R5.0
Correction 90:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Per approved preliminary site plan conditions, civil plan set shall provide a detailed channelization plan for all striping & pavement markings in within ROW. All proposed striping shall meet City and MUTCD requirements. Plan shall include signage located in ROW. All City standard details related to pavement markings, striping, sign placement must be provided.
Civil Plans - R5.0
Correction 91:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide right turn pocket striping + arrows -
Civil Plans - R5.0
Correction 92:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide MUTCD compliant "RIGHT LANE MUST TURN RIGHT" signage
Civil Plans - R5.0
Correction 93:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Provide short interval white skip stripe in advance of solid white gore for right turn pocket
Civil Plans - R5.0
Correction 94:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Channelization?
Civil Plans - R5.0
Correction 95:
See Document Markup
Comments:
details for existing pavement marking removal should be on this sheet
Civil Plans - R5.0
Correction 96:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Verify lane striping alignment with existing striping on the west side of signal.
Civil Plans - R5.0
Correction 97:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Define ROW dedication offset
Civil Plans - R6.3
Correction 98:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Shared use path design does not match previously constructed sections on Shaw Rd.
Civil Plans - R6.3
Correction 99:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Why is there additional dedication behind sidewalk?
Civil Plans - R6.3
Correction 100:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Update all exhibits with scaled drawings
Civil Plans - R6.3
Correction 101:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Update all exhibits with face of curb offset from roadway CL. Should be 34ft from CL along entire E Pioneer frontage.
Civil Plans - R6.3
Correction 102:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Curb alignment/offset shall be constant along E Pioneer (34ft from CL). No physical taper
Civil Plans - R6.3
Correction 103:
See Document Markup
Comments:
City standard streetlights are required every 150ft (minimum).
Project to provide GE EVOLVE ELR2 Fixtures ERL2-3-23-A3-40-D-Gray-A-V1 (City to provide latest part numbers)
How will lights be powered? New service cabinet? Using the existing signal service cabinet?
Streetlights shall have shorting caps installed with remote photocell located on the service cabinet.
Civil Plans - SL.1
Correction 104:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Existing fixtures to be upgraded to current standard
Civil Plans - SL.1
Correction 105:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Clearly identify as being removed. Existing PSE utility pole mounted streetlights do not meet current City standards and will be removed with installation of City standard streetlights.
Civil Plans - SL.1
Correction 106:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Clearly identify as being removed. Existing PSE utility pole mounted streetlights do not meet current City standards and will be removed with installation of City standard streetlights.
Civil Plans - SL.1
Correction 107:
See Document Markup
Comments:
It is the sole responsibility of the design engineer to ensure streetlight design/placement is outside of the 10ft minimum “safe zone” area. The City will not allow streetlights to be within 10ft of the PSE primary for safety reasons. Place this note on this sheet
Civil Plans - SL.1
Correction 108:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Frontage design not consistent with other sheets in this submittal.
Civil Plans - SL.1
Correction 109:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Streetlight design shall provide the following:
1. Provide details on how streetlights will be powered
2. Location of conduit runs
3. Wiring Schedule
a. Conduit size and type for each raceway
b. Conductors details
4. Pole schedule
a. STA & offset for each luminaire
5. Show location of junction boxes
Civil Plans - SL.1
Correction 110:
See Document Markup
Comments:
This light pole is not existing.
Civil Plans - SL.1
Correction 111:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Photometric analysis needs to account for existing City standard lighting on both sides of the street (including lighting at signalized intersection). Assume utility/PSE mounted streetlights will be removed with project.
Civil Plans - SL.1
Correction 112:
See Document Markup
Comments:
J-box and (2) runs of conduit to extend to southern edge of frontage
Civil Plans - SL.1
Correction 113:
See Document Markup
Comments:
J-box and (2) runs of conduit to extend to southern edge of frontage
Civil Plans - SL.1
Correction 114:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Lighting engineer to verify proposed design will meet or exceed WSDOT light level requirements for pedestrian facilities:
Average(fc): 0.8
Uniformity: 4:1
Civil Plans - SL.1
Correction 115:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Show ESD sight lines at this intersection to ensure there are no obstructions.
Civil Plans - R7.0
Public Works Collection Review
Failed
06/20/2024
06/24/2024
Reviewer:
Corrections:
Correction 1:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Remove existing 8 inch pipe (E) when new SWF is installed. No site stormwater should be discharging at this point. [civil plans, R1.1]
Correction 2:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Buried stormwater CB type I. [Civil Plans, R4.0]
Correction 3:
See Document Markup
Comments:
No maintenance access to connection with existing culvert. [Civil Plans, R4.0]
Correction 4:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Stormwater pipe diameter in RoW is 12 inches minimum and should have a trash rack or other applicable device at outlet. [Civil Plans, R4.0]
Public Works Streets Review
Failed
06/20/2024
06/20/2024
Reviewer:
Corrections:
Correction 1:
See Document Markup
Comments:
this is not a "single ramp" R2.0 sheet 4 SH
Correction 2:
See Document Markup
Comments:
CB in pedestrian pathway/crosswalk R2.0 sheet 4 SH
Correction 3:
See Document Markup
Comments:
HMA restoration single lane grind/overlay R2.0 sheet 4 SH
Correction 4:
See Document Markup
Comments:
this is a streetlight not a power pole R3.0 sheet 6 SH
Correction 5:
See Document Markup
Comments:
streetlight removed & relocated by others, who is others R3.1 sheet 7 SH
Correction 6:
See Document Markup
Comments:
grind/overlay one lane width R4.0 sheet 8 SH
Correction 7:
See Document Markup
Comments:
2" grind/ overlay, end square, not a point R4.1 sheet 9 SH
Correction 8:
See Document Markup
Comments:
2" grind/overlay R6.3 sheet 14 SH
Correction 9:
See Document Markup
Comments:
2" grind/overlay to lane line, end square R6.3 sheet 14 SH
Correction 10:
See Document Markup
Comments:
sight distance concerns, do these impede on meeting sight distance requirements, what type of tree/plantings are these, what root barrier or sidewalk damage protection will be used R7 sheet 17 SH
Correction 11:
See Document Markup
Comments:
show what streetlights are existing and what are new. previous page states remove and relocate streetlight/power pole, which ones will be moved, verify conduit continuity and ability to maintain and pull wire if needed, add extra 2" spare conduit throughout width of project, our standard states schedule 80 conduit under roads/driveway...has this been verified it exist, if not replace with schedule 80 across entrance & , verify and state existing wire size and it meets current standards.... SL.1 SH
Correction 12:
See Document Markup
Comments:
signal tech phone number is 253-341-8439
Correction 13:
See Document Markup
Comments:
is this the same one on sheet 7 that says relocate, if it going to be removed why does the sidewalk curve around it SL-1 SH
Correction 14:
See Document Markup
Comments:
show actual location of new underground conduit, in right-of-way SL.1 SH
Correction 15:
See Document Markup
Comments:
show where J-box location will be, armorcast J-boxes should be used.. SL.1 SH
Correction 16:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Correction 17:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Correction 18:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Correction 19:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Correction 20:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Correction 21:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Correction 22:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Correction 23:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Correction 24:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Correction 25:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Correction 26:
See Document Markup
Comments:
Fire Review
Approved
06/20/2024
06/06/2024
Reviewer:
Public Works Water Review
Approved
06/20/2024
06/05/2024
Reviewer:
Planning Review
Failed
06/20/2024
04/30/2024
Reviewer:
Corrections:
Correction 1:
Miscellaneous Planning Correction
Comments:
LANDSCAPE: Remove all street trees shown on Shaw Road planting and utility sheets. The strip is too narrow for new street trees.
SEPA: Provide plans to meet SEPA conditions regarding safe routes to schools. SEPA mitigation measures require implementation of a requirement for off-site safe routes to schools improvements. See P-21-0034 SEPA (June 27, 2023). Please provide those plans for further review and agency consultation.
Engineering Civil Review
Pending
01/17/2025
Reviewer:
Engineering Traffic Review
Pending
01/17/2025
Reviewer:
Public Works Streets Review
Pending
01/17/2025
Reviewer: