| Review Type |
Outcome |
Est. Completion Date |
Completed |
|
Engineering Civil Review
|
Approved
|
04/25/2025
|
04/04/2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-Sheet reference.
[Plans; Sht R2.0 of 46]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-Sheet reference.
[Plans; Sht R2.0 of 46]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-Sheet reference.
[Plans; Sht R2.0 of 46]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-Sheet reference.
[Plans; Sht R2.1 of 46]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-Sheet reference.
[Plans; Sht R2.1 of 46]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-Sheet reference.
[Plans; Sht R2.1 of 46]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-Sheet reference.
[Plans; Sht R2.2 of 46]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-Sheet reference.
[Plans; Sht R2.2 of 46]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-Sheet reference.
[Plans; Sht R2.2 of 46]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Sloped perf pipe?
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 46]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-6" perforated?
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 46]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-67.40 IE?
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 46]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Is there a concern with pole stability (streetlights and utility poles) due to saturated soils associated with the dispersion trench during the wet season?
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 46]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-Sheet reference.
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 46]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Cleanout info?
[Plans; Sht R4.1 of 46]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Is there a concern with pole stability (streetlights and utility poles) due to saturated soils associated with the dispersion trench during the wet season?
[Plans; Sht R4.1 of 46]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-IE (68.77?).
[Plans; Sht R4.1 of 46]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-IE (67.40?).
[Plans; Sht R4.1 of 46]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-IE (67.40?).
[Plans; Sht R4.1 of 46]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-Sheet reference.
[Plans; Sht R4.1 of 46]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Curve info (delta/radius/length)?
[Plans; Sht R4.2 of 46]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Curve info (delta/radius/length)?
[Plans; Sht R4.2 of 46]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-Sheet reference.
[Plans; Sht R5.0 of 46]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-missing from planset.
[Plans; Sht R5.0 of 46]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-Sheet reference.
[Plans; Sht R5.0 of 46]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Detail was removed from the planset. Add back.
[Plans; Sht R5.0 of 46]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-Sheet reference.
[Plans; Sht R5.0 of 46]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-Sheet reference.
[Plans; Sht R5.0 of 46]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Revise-01.03.15.
[Plans; Sht R5.0 of 46]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-Sheet reference.
[Plans; Sht R5.0 of 46]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-Sheet reference.
[Plans; Sht R5.0 of 46]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Per 2/11/25 meeting btwn City and ETC team), provide 4.5' landscape strip.
[Plans; Sht R6.4 of 46]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Per 2/11/25 meeting btwn City and ETC team), provide 4.5' landscape strip.
[Plans; Sht R6.4 of 46]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-Leader location.
[Plans; Sht R6.5 of 46]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Revise-cross-slope (if any) should be toward curbline per standards (0%-1.5% max).
[Plans; Sht R6.5 of 46]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Per prior comment-Add Subgrade shall be prepared in accordance with APWA GSP 2-06.3(3).
[Plans; Sht R6.8 of 46]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Per prior comment-Add "Option 1".
[Plans; Sht R6.8 of 46]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add City Standard Details 01.03.07 // 01.03.08 // 01.03.13 back into the planset.
[Plans; Sht PM-05 of 46]
|
|
Engineering Traffic Review
|
Approved
|
04/25/2025
|
04/03/2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Per 2/11/25 meeting, leave the planter as-is (4.5ft planter with no 2ft gravel shoulder on west side of path). R2.0
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Throughout the civil plan set, revise all pavement marking removal requirements consistent with TENW note below:
Remove existing striping via Hydroblasting or other city approved method
R3.0
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Remove R3-7 Sign
R3.2
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Offset needs to be modified. Should be incorporated into the northern edge of the sidewalk. For more detail, see lighting comments. R4.0
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Offset needs to be modified. Should be incorporated into the northern edge of the sidewalk. For more detail, see lighting comments. R4.1
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Update ESD exhibit to show 14.5ft from the edge of road (not from the stop bar). R4.3
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Gore line is only 150ft
this should be ~190ft
R5.0
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Dotted line 228ft, this should be ~190ft
R5.0
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Where is note 6?
R5.0
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Same scope of work shown in PM-03
R5.0
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Per 2/11/25 meeting:
"Leave the planter as-is (4.5ft planter with no 2ft gravel shoulder on west side of path)"
R6.4
|
|
|
See Document Markup
For the street lights south of intersection, tie into existing
illumination conduit/jbox @ intersection... should be located near signal pole. Don't need a new conduit run, should be sufficient space in existing.
SL.02
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Incorporate light into the
northern edge of sidewalk panel.
SL.02
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Incorporate light into the
northern edge of sidewalk panel.
SL.02
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Here's an example:
northern edge of sidewalk panel adjacent to planter strip.
SL.02
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Run conduit under sidewalk in this area. Should not be run adjacent to wall.
SL.02
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Per last round of comments, bare copper ground wire not allowed - all grounds must be jacketed.
SL.02
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Existing light can be relocated to E Pioneer frontage if it's in good condition and if it meets engineering requirements per 01.05.04
This unit will not be painted green.
SL.03
|
|
|
See Document Markup
This light is along the shared use path and therefore needs to be MOSS GREEN (RAL 6005)
SL.03
|
|
|
See Document Markup
All the MOSS GREEN light poles (16ft arms) along SUP need to match units installed along the Shaw Rd south of 23rd Ave. Shaw Road lights shall use WSDOT standard poles (J-28.10, J-28.40, J-28.50 and J-28.70), same units used on Shaw Rd (south of 23rd Ave).
SL.03
|
|
|
See Document Markup
For all ELR2 fixtures, please add a note that adjustable output units must be ordered.
SL.03
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Should be on one circuit.
|
|
|
See Document Markup
should be able to run on one circuit
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Why 2 circuits for 2 lights?
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Why 2 circuits?
|
|
|
See Document Markup
This detail to be used for all E Pioneer lights (12ft arms, not painted).
The Shaw Rd lights (16ft arms, MOSS GREEN) will use WSDOT spec. SL.10
|
|
|
See Document Markup
After further review, I think it makes sense to just remove completely. Too many SB signs between signal. There will be a 35mph speed limit sign at the end of school zone for SB traffic.
PM-02
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Same scope of work shown in R5.0
PM-03
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Remove R3-7 Sign
R3.2
|
|
|
See Document Markup
After further review, I think it makes sense to just remove completely. Too many SB signs between signal. There will be a 35mph speed limit sign at the end of school zone for SB traffic.
PM-03
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Shift S6 ~3ft north to avoid conflicts
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Per MUTCD/WSDOT, must have 8ft minimum spacing between signal heads.
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
For sign "E" verify minimum 3ft from signal head (centered)
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Sign "D" label conflict.
TS-01
|
|
Public Works Water Review
|
VOID
|
04/25/2025
|
04/03/2025
|
|
|
|
|
Public Works Streets Review
|
VOID
|
04/25/2025
|
04/03/2025
|
|
|
|
|
Public Works Collection Review
|
VOID
|
04/25/2025
|
04/03/2025
|
|
|
|
|
Fire Review
|
VOID
|
04/25/2025
|
04/03/2025
|
|
|
|
|
Planning Review
|
Approved
|
04/25/2025
|
03/31/2025
|
|
|
|
|
Public Works Streets Review
|
Approved
|
03/25/2025
|
03/12/2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Document Markup
this is not a "single ramp" R2.0 sheet 4 SH
|
|
|
See Document Markup
CB in pedestrian pathway/crosswalk R2.0 sheet 4 SH
|
|
|
See Document Markup
HMA restoration single lane grind/overlay R2.0 sheet 4 SH
|
|
|
See Document Markup
this is a streetlight not a power pole R3.0 sheet 6 SH
|
|
|
See Document Markup
streetlight removed & relocated by others, who is others R3.1 sheet 7 SH
|
|
|
See Document Markup
grind/overlay one lane width R4.0 sheet 8 SH
|
|
|
See Document Markup
2" grind/ overlay, end square, not a point R4.1 sheet 9 SH
|
|
|
See Document Markup
2" grind/overlay R6.3 sheet 14 SH
|
|
|
See Document Markup
2" grind/overlay to lane line, end square R6.3 sheet 14 SH
|
|
|
See Document Markup
sight distance concerns, do these impede on meeting sight distance requirements, what type of tree/plantings are these, what root barrier or sidewalk damage protection will be used R7 sheet 17 SH
|
|
|
See Document Markup
show what streetlights are existing and what are new. previous page states remove and relocate streetlight/power pole, which ones will be moved, verify conduit continuity and ability to maintain and pull wire if needed, add extra 2" spare conduit throughout width of project, our standard states schedule 80 conduit under roads/driveway...has this been verified it exist, if not replace with schedule 80 across entrance & , verify and state existing wire size and it meets current standards.... SL.1 SH
|
|
|
See Document Markup
signal tech phone number is 253-341-8439
|
|
|
See Document Markup
is this the same one on sheet 7 that says relocate, if it going to be removed why does the sidewalk curve around it SL-1 SH
|
|
|
See Document Markup
show actual location of new underground conduit, in right-of-way SL.1 SH
|
|
|
See Document Markup
show where J-box location will be, armorcast J-boxes should be used.. SL.1 SH
|
|
|
See Document Markup
|
|
|
See Document Markup
|
|
|
See Document Markup
|
|
|
See Document Markup
|
|
|
See Document Markup
|
|
|
See Document Markup
|
|
|
See Document Markup
|
|
|
See Document Markup
|
|
|
See Document Markup
|
|
|
See Document Markup
|
|
|
See Document Markup
|
|
|
See Document Markup
remove/replace existing driveway curb cuts with new C&G, expand single lane grind/overlay to this extents SH R2.0
|
|
|
See Document Markup
continue single lane improvement around corner where road is cut for new C&G SH R4.0
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Over 2% , non compliant
SH R4.2
|
|
|
See Document Markup
will this puddle here
SH R4.2
|
|
|
See Document Markup
1 1/4" minimum conduit size per City Standard
SH SL.02
|
|
|
See Document Markup
remove blank out sign
SH TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
show conduit, AC power preferred for this one
SH TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
|
|
Engineering Traffic Review
|
Failed
|
03/25/2025
|
03/10/2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Remove thru/right thermoplastic arrow
Civil Plans - R2.0
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Remove thru/right thermoplastic arrow
Civil Plans - R2.0
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Shared use path design not consistent with previously constructed sections on Shaw Rd. 2ft shoulders are required on each side of path Per WSDOT 1515.04(2)(b)
Civil Plans - R2.0
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Per WSDOT 1515.04(2)(g), verify there are no obstrictions within 1ft of edge of pavement along the entire length of SUP
Civil Plans - R2.0
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Identify existing driveway curb cuts that will be required to be replaced with City standard curb/gutter.
Civil Plans - R2.0
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Updated autoturn analysis for updated intersection geometry/striping. SBR, NBR
Civil Plans - R2.0
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide detailed cost estimate for the Shaw Rd frontage improvements only. Applicant will receive a traffic impact fee credit for the cost to construct frontage on Shaw Rd.
Civil Plans - R2.1
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Remove thru/right thermoplastic arrow
Civil Plans - R2.2
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Remove thru/right thermoplastic arrow
Civil Plans - R2.2
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Sheet missing from match line reference
Civil Plans - R3.2
|
|
|
See Document Markup
This unit will be 30ft light with 12ft arm. Please review comments on street light sheets for relocation requirements.
Civil Plans - R4.0
|
|
|
See Document Markup
This unit will be 30ft light with 12ft arm. Please review comments on street light sheets for relocation requirements.
Civil Plans - R4.0
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Right turn on red sight distance analysis at this location.
Civil Plans - R4.0
|
|
|
See Document Markup
This unit will be 30ft light with 12ft arm. Please review comments on street light sheets for relocation requirements.
Civil Plans - R4.1
|
|
|
See Document Markup
This unit will be 30ft light with 12ft arm. Civil Plans - R4.1
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Reference STOP sign standard detail in plan set
Civil Plans - R5.0
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide single object marker (OM-3R) per COP 01.03.13
Offset 5.5ft from face of curb to avoid sight obstruction from adjacent off-site driveway
Civil Plans - R5.0
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Have radius directly transition into taper fog line without reverse curvature
Civil Plans - R5.0
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Match line stationing is off by about 5ft
Civil Plans - R5.0
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Match existing 30/10 skip striping to the west (01.03.10, D). Shift offset slightly to match existing lane widths, (2) 11ft lanes.
Civil Plans - R5.0
|
|
|
See Document Markup
For striping, pavement markings, and RPM layout within left turn pocket and TWLTL segment, reference City Standard 01.03.6,7,8,9
Civil Plans - R5.0
|
|
|
See Document Markup
For striping, pavement markings, and RPM layout within left/right turn pocket and TWLTL segment, reference City Standard 01.03.6,7,8,9
Civil Plans - R5.0
|
|
|
See Document Markup
move this transition point to STA ~46+86. This will provide a roughly 50/50 split between short interval skip and solid gore (similar to WSDOT M-5.10-03)
Move the arrow/only pavement marking accordingly
Civil Plans - R5.0
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Wide dotted lane per WSDOT M-5.10-03
3ft long, 8" wide thermoplastic bars with 9ft spacing, double RPM between every other stripe
Civil Plans - R5.0
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Remove this only/right arrow combo. Two combos should be sufficient.
Civil Plans - R5.0
|
|
|
See Document Markup
This sign will be blocked by street trees within the 10ft planter strip. Put a note on plans to contact City PW and Engineering staff to help field fit location prior to installation.
Civil Plans - R5.0
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide 2ft shoulder on both sides of 10ft shared use path. Planter strip in this area does not meet WSDOT standards for shared use paths.
Civil Plans - R6.4
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide 2ft shoulder on both sides of 10ft shared use path. Planter strip in this area does not meet WSDOT standards for shared use paths.
Civil Plans - R6.4
|
|
|
See Document Markup
ROW measurements are not scaled properly.
|
|
|
See Document Markup
These measurements are to the north side of meeker southern RR property. This does not represent City of Puyallup ROW limits.
|
|
|
See Document Markup
-Road sections should be split by block as defined in WSDOT stds and IES standards
-Intersections should be individually analyzed as defined in WSDOT stds and IES standards
-Sidewalks should be analyzed in sections as defined in WSDOT stds and IES standards
-Calculation points should be spaced at 5 feet by 5 feet
-Adjust the luminaire arm lengths to be 16 feet to match Shaw Road up the hill
Civil Plans - SL.01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Does the analysis include the all existing lights?
Civil Plans - SL.01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Use city standard 30ft pole with 12ft arm. Place within back of planter strip, front of walk.
Civil Plans - SL.02
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Use city standard 30ft pole with 12ft arm. Incorporate light/j-box into the northern edge of sidewalk panel.
Civil Plans - SL.02
|
|
|
See Document Markup
relocate j-box to this area. Avoid conflicts with future sidewalk.
Civil Plans - SL.02
|
|
|
See Document Markup
The existing arm not long enough for SUP (12ft vs 16ft).
Use 30ft poles with 16ft arms (same design as City constructed shared use path south of 23rd Ave SE).
Use MOSS GREEN (RAL 6005)
Civil Plans - SL.02
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Use 30ft poles with 16ft arms (same design as City constructed shared use path south of 23rd Ave SE).
Use MOSS GREEN (RAL 6005)
Civil Plans - SL.02
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Use 30ft poles with 16ft arms (same design as City constructed shared use path south of 23rd Ave SE).
Use MOSS GREEN (RAL 6005)
Civil Plans - SL.02
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Use 30ft poles with 16ft arms (same design as City constructed shared use path south of 23rd Ave SE).
Use MOSS GREEN (RAL 6005)
Civil Plans - SL.02
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Use 30ft poles with 16ft arms (same design as City constructed shared use path south of 23rd Ave SE).
Use MOSS GREEN (RAL 6005)
Civil Plans - SL.02
|
|
|
See Document Markup
add:
"It is the sole responsibility of the design team to" to the beginning of this note
Civil Plans - SL.02
|
|
|
See Document Markup
might be helpful to show existing lighting/signal conduit/jboxes
Civil Plans - SL.02
|
|
|
See Document Markup
2" conduit
Civil Plans - SL.02
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Must be pole and bracket wire
Civil Plans - SL.02
|
|
|
See Document Markup
bare copper ground not allowed. must be jacketed
Civil Plans - SL.02
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Have these lights connect to the Safeway signal service cabinet
Civil Plans - SL.02
|
|
|
See Document Markup
For the street lights south of intersection, tie into existing illumination conduit/jbox @ intersection... should be located near signal pole
Civil Plans - SL.02
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Keep existing LED streetlight
Civil Plans - SL.02
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Use city standard 30ft pole with 12ft arm. Incorporate light/j-box into the northern edge of sidewalk panel.
Civil Plans - SL.02
|
|
|
See Document Markup
There's existing conduit in this area, Would the contractor be utilizing this existing conduit?
Civil Plans - SL.02
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Have these lights connect to the Shaw/Pioneer signal service cabinet
Civil Plans - SL.02
|
|
|
See Document Markup
STL.01,2,4,5,6 :
Use 30ft poles with 16ft arms same design as City constructed shared use path south of 23rd Ave SE).
Use MOSS GREEN (RAL 6005)
Civil Plans - SL.03
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Update as needed for new/modified circuits.
Civil Plans - SL.03
|
|
|
See Document Markup
For STL.03, keep existing LED at traffic signal
Civil Plans - SL.03
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Needs to be upgraded to green 16ft pole. This pole can be relocated to E Pioneer frontage if in good condition.
Civil Plans - SL.03
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Shorting Caps needed for Streetlights. Lights will be triggered by remote photocell located on service cabinets
Civil Plans - SL.03
|
|
|
See Document Markup
To be used for E Pioneer lights
Civil Plans - SL.10
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Remove arrows for Thru/right movement
Civil Plans - PM-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Remove arrows for Thru/right movement
Civil Plans - PM-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
In this area, sidewalk/planter strip dimensions/alignment not consistent with frontage sheets in this area.
Civil Plans - PM-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Should direct peds south to the nearest crosswalk
Civil Plans - PM-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Should direct peds south to the nearest crosswalk
Civil Plans - PM-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Will be obstructed by S5, maybe S5 should be relocated to back of sidewalk.
Civil Plans - PM-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Given the unusual dimensions of this sign, include guidance on height and offset placement requirements to meet City and ADA requirements
Civil Plans - PM-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
RSSZ flasher
-Reference applicable WAC/RCW with placement/design justification.
-How did the design team determine placement?
-Missing S1-1 advanced warning sign. Include optional S4-3P
-Pavement markings missing from design
-Verify MUTCD compliance
-Coordinate with the City for required hardware & wireless interconnect
PM-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Flashing beacon located ~150ft from NW Christian School. Please provide engineering justification for this placement
PM-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
RSSZ flasher
-Reference applicable WAC/RCW with placement/design justification.
-How did the design team determine placement?
-Missing S1-1 advanced warning sign. Include optional S4-3P
-Pavement markings missing from design
-Verify MUTCD compliance
-Coordinate with the City for required hardware & wireless interconnect
PM-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide MUTCD compliant END SCHOOL ZONE signage with speed limit signage.
PM-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
WAC 468-95-330 School speed limit assembly (S4-1, S4-2, S4-3,
S4-4, S5-1). Pursuant to RCW 46.61.440, paragraph 07 in MUTCD Section
7B.15 is replaced with a Standard to read:
Applicable to state highways, county roads, or city streets, the
reduced school or playground speed zone shall extend for 300 feet in
either direction from the marked crosswalk when the marked crosswalk
is fully posted with standard school speed limit signs or standard
playground speed limit signs.
Applicable to county roads or city streets, the school or playground speed zone may extend up to 300 feet from the border of theschool or playground property when fully posted with standard school
speed limit signs or standard playground speed limit signs. However,
the speed zone may only include the area consistent with active school
or playground use.
No school or playground speed zone may extend less than 300 feet
from a marked school or playground crosswalk, but may extend by traffic regulation beyond 300 feet based on a traffic and engineering investigation.
The speed limit signs shown in Figure 7B-5 shall be located per
RCW 46.61.440.
PM-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Per MUTCD, include S4.5, S1-1+S4-3P in this area. Provide MUTCD complaint spacing measurements.
Civil Plans - PM-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Per MUTCD, include S4.5, S1-1+S4-3P in this area. Provide MUTCD complaint spacing measurements.
Civil Plans - PM-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide MUTCD compliant END SCHOOL ZONE signage with speed limit signage.
PM-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Please verify per MUTCD
Civil Plans - PM-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add "SCHOOL" thermoplastic pavement marking 50ft in advance of beacon
Civil Plans - PM-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add "SCHOOL" thermoplastic pavement marking 50ft in advance of beacon. Markings shall span across both lanes of SB Shaw Rd. May need to shift beacon farther south to provide adequate clearance from signalized intersection.
Civil Plans - PM-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add "SCHOOL" thermoplastic pavement marking 50ft in advance of beacon.
Civil Plans - PM-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Use hydroblasting for marking removal.
PM-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Remove existing white gore and short skip. New lane lines will match existing 30/10 skip striping to the west (01.03.10, D).
PM-02
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Relocate S-1 (35mph speed limit) to this area
PM-02
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Use hydroblasting for marking removal.
PM-02
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide measurement to school property (Shaw Rd Elementary). Should be 300ft
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
RSSZ flasher
-Coordinate with the City for required hardware & wireless interconnect. TAPCO units per PSD requirements. This location can be solar powered since there's no available power source nearby.
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
RSSZ flasher
-Coordinate with the City for required hardware & wireless interconnect. TAPCO units per PSD requirements
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide measurement to school property (NW Christian School)
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
just "SHAW RD"
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
This sign was previously a R9-3A that is now post mounted, S6? This sign H should be removed
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Road name sign should not be mounted between signal heads... should be located over curb line. Use traditional sign (not lighted units)
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Remove. In-lieu of electronic blank out signs, LPI will be used to protect pedestrians in the marked crosswalk (when there's a ped call). TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
These signs do not exist. City does not want these installed
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Sign "E" should be installed in this area for FYA
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Road name sign should not be mounted between signal heads. Remove and install new street name sign "SHAW RD"
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Center 71/41 4-section head on EBL turn pocket (shift 2-3ft north).
Shift 43/42 heads farther north as needed
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Sign "E" should be installed in this area for FYA
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Phase 4/8 diagram confusing. The WB FYA (phase 8) will not run when there's a phase 4 ped call (WBL will show red arrow during phase 8). Alternatively, if there's no ped call on phase 4, the FYA will run during phase 8. Modern 2070 controllers will do this automatically.
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
The City will be adding LPI to phase 4 ped to protect pedestrians in the marked crosswalk from right turn on red conflicts (EBR). The electronic blank out sign will be removed.
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Shift 83 & 84 3-section heads farther south to better align with WBR/WBT approach.
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Evaluate possible options for school zone signage on 12th Ave SE
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Remove 32/82 4-section side fire head
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Remove 32/82 4-section side fire head
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
New heads shall match all others at this intersection.
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Remove. In-lieu of electronic blank out signs, LPI will be used to protect pedestrians in the marked crosswalk (when there's a ped call). TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Trench behind walk to tie into existing electical (illumination) jbox and run wire to existing service cabinet. Coordinate new breaker with PW.
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Move sign/beacon to planter for improved visibility. Edge of sign should maintain 2ft clearance from face of curb. Stationing may need to be adjusted to accommodate "SCHOOL" pavement markings.
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Not ADA compliant. Push button too far from roadway. Move ped pole to the top of ped curb to lessen the distance to the road
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
this conduit run is for lighting only. Missing from wire notes. See as-built dwg.
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
This conduit run is for signal conductors only. As built dwg show there are 2-2" conduit. Install all signal wire in there.
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Remove this conduit. The existing jbox is for existing lighting only. no signal unless PW approves otherwise.
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
If you are extending conductors, you will need to rewire back to the controller. No splicing of signal conductors is allowed.
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
push button needs to be within 10 feet of roadway. shift closer to roadway.
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Use Leotek TSL-PED-16-spc-v1
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
shrink path width to 5ft to allow ped button to be shifted farther from roadway. This location is highly susceptible to turning vehicle strikes
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Move ped pole to the front of ped curb to increase the distance to the road. This location is highly susceptible to turning vehicle strikes
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Remove from design sheets.
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Utilize for new lighting circuit TS-02
|
|
|
See Document Markup
only 1-2" needed to pole
TS-02
|
|
|
See Document Markup
this ex is in the lighting conduit? Doesn't match as built dwg.
TS-02
|
|
|
See Document Markup
install this in wire note 15
TS-02
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Is this true? verify.
TS-02
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify all wiring with as built drawing. TS-02
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add:
Fully configured and operational includes adaptive configuration, overhead fiber connectivity, all intersection striping, signal hardware, signage, all on-street lighting, etc. are installed and operational.
TS-02
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Contractor shall verify and confirm all existing poles and foundations will accommodate new loadings. TS-04
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Ensure placement does not obstruct visibility of SB signal heads (62).
TS-05
|
|
|
See Document Markup
New 43 head shall match all other 3 section heads at this intersection (color, dimensions, no backplate, attachment type/bracket, etc.
TS-05
|
|
|
See Document Markup
How is this wired? TS-05
|
|
|
See Document Markup
2
TS-02
|
|
|
See Document Markup
FYA signs? TS-04
|
|
|
See Document Markup
51?
TS-04
|
|
|
See Document Markup
40?
TS-04
|
|
|
See Document Markup
too far out. More like 20?
TS-04
|
|
|
See Document Markup
verify TS-04
|
|
|
See Document Markup
FYA signs? TS-04
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Per 2/11/25 meeting, leave the planter as-is (4.5ft planter with no 2ft gravel shoulder on west side of path). R2.0
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Throughout the civil plan set, revise all pavement marking removal requirements consistent with TENW note below:
Remove existing striping via Hydroblasting or other city approved method
R3.0
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Remove R3-7 Sign
R3.2
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Offset needs to be modified. Should be incorporated into the northern edge of the sidewalk. For more detail, see lighting comments. R4.0
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Offset needs to be modified. Should be incorporated into the northern edge of the sidewalk. For more detail, see lighting comments. R4.1
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Update ESD exhibit to show 14.5ft from the edge of road (not from the stop bar). R4.3
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Gore line is only 150ft
this should be ~190ft
R5.0
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Dotted line 228ft, this should be ~190ft
R5.0
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Where is note 6?
R5.0
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Same scope of work shown in PM-03
R5.0
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Per 2/11/25 meeting:
"Leave the planter as-is (4.5ft planter with no 2ft gravel shoulder on west side of path)"
R6.4
|
|
|
See Document Markup
For the street lights south of intersection, tie into existing
illumination conduit/jbox @ intersection... should be located near signal pole. Don't need a new conduit run, should be sufficient space in existing.
SL.02
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Incorporate light into the
northern edge of sidewalk panel.
SL.02
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Incorporate light into the
northern edge of sidewalk panel.
SL.02
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Here's an example:
northern edge of sidewalk panel adjacent to planter strip.
SL.02
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Run conduit under sidewalk in this area. Should not be run adjacent to wall.
SL.02
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Per last round of comments, bare copper ground wire not allowed - all grounds must be jacketed.
SL.02
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Existing light can be relocated to E Pioneer frontage if it's in good condition and if it meets engineering requirements per 01.05.04
This unit will not be painted green.
SL.03
|
|
|
See Document Markup
This light is along the shared use path and therefore needs to be MOSS GREEN (RAL 6005)
SL.03
|
|
|
See Document Markup
All the MOSS GREEN light poles (16ft arms) along SUP need to match units installed along the Shaw Rd south of 23rd Ave. Shaw Road lights shall use WSDOT standard poles (J-28.10, J-28.40, J-28.50 and J-28.70), same units used on Shaw Rd (south of 23rd Ave).
SL.03
|
|
|
See Document Markup
For all ELR2 fixtures, please add a note that adjustable output units must be ordered.
SL.03
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Should be on one circuit.
|
|
|
See Document Markup
should be able to run on one circuit
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Why 2 circuits for 2 lights?
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Why 2 circuits?
|
|
|
See Document Markup
This detail to be used for all E Pioneer lights (12ft arms, not painted).
The Shaw Rd lights (16ft arms, MOSS GREEN) will use WSDOT spec. SL.10
|
|
|
See Document Markup
After further review, I think it makes sense to just remove completely. Too many SB signs between signal. There will be a 35mph speed limit sign at the end of school zone for SB traffic.
PM-02
|
|
|
See Document Markup
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Same scope of work shown in R5.0
PM-03
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Remove R3-7 Sign
R3.2
|
|
|
See Document Markup
After further review, I think it makes sense to just remove completely. Too many SB signs between signal. There will be a 35mph speed limit sign at the end of school zone for SB traffic.
PM-03
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Shift S6 ~3ft north to avoid conflicts
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Per MUTCD/WSDOT, must have 8ft minimum spacing between signal heads.
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
For sign "E" verify minimum 3ft from signal head (centered)
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Sign "D" label conflict.
TS-01
|
|
Engineering Civil Review
|
Failed
|
03/25/2025
|
03/07/2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify leader location (noted floodplain is beyond project limits).
[Storm Report; Pg 59 of 273]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Remove this section.
[Storm Report; Pg 186 of 273]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Remove this section.
[Storm Report; Pg 188 of 273]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Clarify-is this the existing 8in pipe to be removed?
[Storm Report; Pg 229 of 273]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Clarify-how can there be 6in of ponding on a 25% slope?
[Storm Report; Pg 256 of 273]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add the following City Standard Notes:
-General (See CS 2.4)
-Grading, Erosion, and Sedimentation (See CS 505)
-Roadway (See CS 104)
-Stormwater (See CS 207)
[Plans; Sht R0.0 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Delete.
[Plans; Sht R1.0 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
This detail does not apply within the ROW. Use City Standard pavement section.
[Plans; Sht R2.0 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Use City Std pavement section w/in the ROW per callout on City Std Detail 01.02.16.
[Plans; Sht R2.0 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add detail reference for Shared Use Path PHMA on PATB.
[Plans; Sht R2.0 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Shared Use Path shall be PHMA on PATB.
[Plans; Sht R2.0 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add detail reference for Shared Use Path PHMA on PATB.
[Plans; Sht R2.1 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
This detail does not apply within the ROW. Use City Standard pavement section.
[Plans; Sht R2.1 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Shared Use Path shall be PHMA on PATB.
[Plans; Sht R2.1 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Per subsequent conversation with Public Works, revise ROW dedication as shown. Submit an easement on City form for review and approval associated with City maintenance of the traffic signal/equpment and ADA ramps (portion located on private property) at the Shaw Road entrance. Upon approval, record the easement with the Pierce County auditor. (Easement form is available on the Development Engineering webpage in Appendix C of the City Standards.)
[Plans; Sht R2.2 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
This detail does not apply within the ROW. Use City Standard pavement section.
[Plans; Sht R2.0 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Use City Std pavement section w/in the ROW per callout on City Std Detail 01.02.16.
[Plans; Sht R2.0 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Confirm-callout location.
[Plans; Sht R2.2 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Max. x-slope is 2% per City Stds and PROWAG. Revise landing accordingly.
[Plans; Sht R2.2 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide spot elevation at this point. Double-check 5% max grade btwn valley flowline and spot elevation w/in confines of the crosswalk.
[Plans; Sht R2.2 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
This elevation exceeds the max. allowable grade (5% for x-walks) btwn the curb and valley gutter flowline. Revise accodingly.
[Plans; Sht R2.2 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Revise-per grade comment above.
[Plans; Sht R2.2 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Clarify-how does this area not hold runoff (pond)? FG adjacent to the pedestrian curb and at 1/4 radius is EL 70.30, but the edge of the valley gutter is El 70.46 to 70.38 and valley flowline is El 70.42 to El 70.36 (approx Sta 12+96.6 to 13+03.7)
[Plans; Sht R2.2 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add detail reference for Shared Use Path PHMA on PATB.
[Plans; Sht R2.2 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
NTE-not identified on the Shaw Road detail.
[Plans; Sht R2.2 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Legibility.
[Plans; Sht R2.2 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Is this centerline of approach? If not, indicate centerline.
[Plans; Sht R2.2 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Identify PC/PT stations (typ).
[Plans; Sht R2.2 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
??
[Plans; Sht R2.2 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout scale for this detail.
[Plans; Sht R2.2 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Reference.
[Plans; Sht R3.0 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Reference.
[Plans; Sht R3.0 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Reference.
[Plans; Sht R3.1 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Relocate existing handhole outside of new road section.
[Plans; Sht R3.1 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Reference.
[Plans; Sht R3.1 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
This detail does not apply within the ROW. Use City Standard pavement section.
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-PVC.
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Per prior comment-Show existing buried CB adjacent to CB D4-10697.
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Show 100yr floodplain on profile (per Sept 8, 2022 LOMR).
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify pipe sizing and identify pipe as being perforated.
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Use DI pipe due to shallow bury. (Typ)
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Depth of bury for pole foundation shall be measured from bottom of wall to bottom of foundation unless separate structural design provided.
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify top of pipe elev with curb inlet dimensions for constructability.
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Clarify-type of retaining wall?
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Clarify-station.
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Per CWatt email dated 01-23-25, adjust flowline profile to 0.4%.
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-sheet reference.
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-storm calcs require 300lf of CAVFS. Only 272lf provided.
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout grade board elevation
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout-CO-R7?
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-Out?
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-Out?
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-Out?
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide detail for the debris barrier.
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Pipe to the west?
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Confirm-IE.
[Plans; Sht R4.1 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Clarify-type of retaining wall?
[Plans; Sht R4.1 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Use DI pipe for curb inlet crossings due to shallow bury. (Typ)
[Plans; Sht R4.1 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify top of pipe elev with curb inlet dimensions for constructability. (typ)
[Plans; Sht R4.1 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Identify "perforated" pipes on profile.
[Plans; Sht R4.1 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout grade board elevation
[Plans; Sht R4.1 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify callout.
[Plans; Sht R4.1 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
This detail does not apply within the ROW. Use City Standard pavement section.
[Plans; Sht R4.1 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-Keynote 7?
[Plans; Sht R4.1 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Per City-AHBL email exchange dated 01-24-25:
-verify perf pipe sizing.
-reduce planter strip to 3.5ft to allow 12in wide gravel spreader adjacent to dispersion trench.
-provide 1ft elevation difference btwn flowline and top of grade board.
-provide downturned ells into the sump on the dispersion trench perf pipes.
-provide backwater analysis between flowline and the dispersion trench up to the 50 year event to ensure no new flooding of the roadway.
[Plans; Sht R4.1 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-storm calcs require 300lf of CAVFS. Only 272lf provided.
[Plans; Sht R4.1 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-Out?
[Plans; Sht R4.1 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-Out?
[Plans; Sht R4.1 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-Out?
[Plans; Sht R4.1 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Confirm-IE.
[Plans; Sht R4.1 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Per CWatt email dated 01-23-25, adjust flowline profile to 0.4%.
[Plans; Sht R4.1 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Revise flowline elevations for 0.4% profile. (Typ).
[Plans; Sht R4.2 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Confirm-IE.
[Plans; Sht R4.2 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Readability.
[Plans; Sht R4.2 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Identify PC/PT.
[Plans; Sht R4.2 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
See comments on Sheet R4.0 and R4.1.
[Plans; Sht R4.2 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout barricade per City Std Detail 01.02.20.
[Plans; Sht R4.2 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Revise-max. x-slope is 2%.
[Plans; Sht R4.2 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
This detail does not apply within the ROW. Use City Standard pavement section.
[Plans; Sht R4.2 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Use City Std pavement section w/in the ROW per callout on City Std Detail 01.02.16.
[Plans; Sht R4.2 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout barricade per City Std Detail 01.02.20.
[Plans; Sht R5.0 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Clarify-is this the existing 8in pipe to be removed?
[Plans; Sht R6.2 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Clarify-outlet pipe.
[Plans; Sht R6.2 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add Note: "Soil-Compost Mix shall be in accordance with the Ecology Manual, BMP T7.40. Provide manufacturer's or supplier's certification and soil analysis to the City prior to placement of the soil-compost mix."...or similar language.
[Plans; Sht R6.2 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Please extend dimn line or adjust callout leader.
[Plans; Sht R6.4 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Clarify-Existing 1/2-ROW to centerline is:
-35' btwn 9+20 and 9+86;
-60' btwn 9+86 and 11+82.
[Plans; Sht R6.4 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Identify-"Existing ROW".
[Plans; Sht R6.4 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Clarify-2.6ft? (vs 2ft)
[Plans; Sht R6.4 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Revise to "10.00' Permeable HMA Sidewalk".
[Plans; Sht R6.4 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-Dedication width (16' vs 16.6')?
[Plans; Sht R6.4 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Please extend dimn line or adjust callout leader.
[Plans; Sht R6.4 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Revise to "10.00' Permeable HMA Sidewalk".
[Plans; Sht R6.4 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Clarify-2.6ft? (vs 2ft)
[Plans; Sht R6.4 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-Dedication width (13' vs 13.6')?
[Plans; Sht R6.4 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout cross-slope.
[Plans; Sht R6.4 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout cross-slope.
[Plans; Sht R6.4 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Revise detail callout for PHMA.
[Plans; Sht R6.4 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Revise detail callout for PHMA.
[Plans; Sht R6.4 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
The Shared Use Path (10ft section) shall be in accordance with the materials and thicknesses indicated for the existing Shaw Road Shared Use. See additional comment on Sheet R6.8.
[Plans; Sht R6.4 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Coordinate w/ Pavement Marking Plans.
[Plans; Sht R6.4 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Coordinate lane dim'ns w/ Pavement Marking Plans.
[Plans; Sht R6.4 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-the legal description on the draft dedication document appears to indicate 18.8'.
[Plans; Sht R6.4 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Please extend dimn line or adjust callout leader.
[Plans; Sht R6.5 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
This detail does not apply within the ROW. Use City Standard pavement section.
[Plans; Sht R6.5 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout top of grade board elevation.
[Plans; Sht R6.5 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
This detail does not apply within the ROW. Use City Standard pavement section.
[Plans; Sht R6.5 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Please extend dimn line or adjust callout leader.
[Plans; Sht R6.5 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Please extend dimn line or adjust callout leader.
[Plans; Sht R6.5 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Clarify-Is there a set dimension for the wall off back of walk?
[Plans; Sht R6.5 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-City records indicate a 60ft existing ROW. Is there a recorded instrument that indicates otherwise?
[Plans; Sht R6.5 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-City records indicate a 75ft existing ROW. Is there a recorded instrument that indicates otherwise?
[Plans; Sht R6.5 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Reduce planter strip to 3.5ft to allow 12in gravel spreader adjacent to dispersion trench.
[Plans; Sht R6.5 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout surface width of CAVFS surface.
[Plans; Sht R6.5 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-Dedication width....(12+11+11+0.5+4+8+2+2.5+2-30 = 23').
[Plans; Sht R6.5 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-See dedication comment on 2/R6.5 above.
[Plans; Sht R6.5 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout cross-slope.
[Plans; Sht R6.5 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout cross-slope.
[Plans; Sht R6.5 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout and show 1ft wide gravel spreader per comments on Sheet R4.1.
[Plans; Sht R6.5 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout and show 1ft wide gravel spreader per comments on Sheet R4.1.
[Plans; Sht R6.5 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout top of grade board elevation.
[Plans; Sht R6.5 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Confirm-intent is to have non-symmetrical x-section (6 1/2 vs 6 3/4)?
[Plans; Sht R6.8 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Min. 4" base course required for work in the ROW.
[Plans; Sht R6.8 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add-Subgrade shall be prepared in accordance with APWA GSP 2-06.3(3).
[Plans; Sht R6.8 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide detail for PHMA and PATB associated with the Shared Use Path. Cross-section shall be in accordance with the materials and thicknesses indicated for the existing Shaw Road Shared Use path and the following criteria:
-Subgrade shall be prepared in accordance with APWA GSP 2-06.3(3).
-Permeable Ballast per APWA GSP 4-04.2 (9-03.9(2)) Option 1.
-Permeable ATB per APWA GSP 4SA2.
-Permeable HMA per APWA GSP 5-04.2 (9-03.8) and APW GSP 5-04.3(7)A.
[Plans; Sht R6.8 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add the following:
POROUS PAVEMENT SUBGRADE PREPARATION NOTES
1. Remove existing organic or paving materials from the surface to be prepared.
2. Prepare the subgrade in accordance with the geotechnical engineer’s requirements and the following:
3. Excavation to final subgrade shall occur immediately prior to placing permeable materials. If necessary, the contractor may excavate to an intermediate subgrade elevation established at 12-inches above the final subgrade to assist with field operations.
4. Grading to final subgrade elevation shall be completed by machinery operation on the intermediate subgrade level or outside of the porous fill/pavement prism.
5. The contractor shall phase the work so as not to compromise or overly compact the subgrade. Should it be necessary for machinery or trucks to access the final subgrade in a certain area, the contractor shall protect the subgrade from over-compaction by placing steel sheets, or using another methodology approved by the geotechnical engineer and City.
6. Areas determined to be overly compacted in the opinion of the Engineer, Geotechnical Engineer, or City, shall be scarified by the contractor to a depth agreed upon by the Engineer, Geotechnical Engineer, and City.
7. Loose or disturbed areas identified during excavation to grade shall be over-excavated to firm bearing and replaced with APWA/WSDOT GSP permeable ballast.
8. Approved porous fill materials shall be back-dumped onto the subgrade from the edge of the installation and pushed out onto the subgrade.
9. Trucks shall then back-dump subsequent loads on top of the previously dumped/pushed material as the installation progresses.
10. Final compaction shall be verified by the Geotechnical Engineer.
[Plans; Sht R6.8 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add-Non-woven.
[Plans; Sht R6.8 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add-APWA GSP 4-04.2 (9-03.9(2)) Option 1.
[Plans; Sht R6.8 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add- per APWA GSP 5-06.SA.
[Plans; Sht R6.8 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout-illumination run.
[Plans; Sht SL.02 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Depth of bury for pole foundation shall be measured from bottom of retaining wall to bottom of foundation unless separate structural design provided.
[Plans; Sht SL.02 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Depth of bury for pole foundation shall be measured from bottom of retaining wall to bottom of foundation unless separate structural design provided.
[Plans; Sht SL.02 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add-"and j-box in concrete".
[Plans; Sht RSL.02 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-arm length per Traffic Engineer.
[Plans; Sht RSL.02 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add Note: "Depth of bury for pole foundation shall be measured from bottom of retaining wall to bottom of foundation unless separate structural design provided.
[Plans; Sht SL.03 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Revise ROW dedication as shown.
[Plans; Sht PM-01 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Readability.
[Plans; Sht PM-02 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Revise per comment on Page 5 of 5.
[Draft Dedication; Pg 1 of 5]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Continue ROW dedication as indicated. Grant easement per comment on Sheet R2.2.
[Draft Dedication; Pg 5 of 5]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-the legal description appears to indicate 18.8' vs 16.6' noted on plans.
[Draft Dedication; Pg 5 of 5]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
There's also a much larger tributary basin east of the project site which also contributes flows to the roadside channel along Pioneer.
[Storm Report; Pg 7 of 207]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Please add "currently being" here.
[Storm Report; Pg 7 of 207]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
"passes through multiple culverts along the property frontage before being split into two separate piped systems which ultimately discharge to the roadside channel on the north side of Pioneer. The first piped system consists of two pipes adjacent to each other, 12in and 18in ductilie iron, which crosses Pioneer just east of the intersection. The CB's connected to these pipes are located within the travel lane with the CB connected to the 18in pipe currently buried under pavement. The other CB is visible with a solid lid. The second pipe system crosses Shaw Road westerly before turning northwest in a buried structure and discharging to the Pioneer north channel on the west side of Shaw Road."
[Storm Report; Pg 7 of 207]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
"Deer Creek and"
[Storm Report; Pg 7 of 207]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
"the southside of "
[Storm Report; Pg 7 of 207]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
The road runoff along Pioneer discharges to a fish bearing stream so Enhanced Treatement is required. Revise the Pioneer water quality features (media filter and bioswale) accordingly.
[Storm Report; Pg 7 of 207]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Enhanced treatment required. Revise accordingly.
[Storm Report; Pg 7 of 207]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
See comments under Section 2.2 and revise accordingly.
[Storm Report; Pg 8 of 207]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Please add "existing wetpond constructed during the Shaw Road CIP".
[Storm Report; Pg 8 of 207]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Enhanced Treatment required.
[Storm Report; Pg 9 of 207]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Use O&M BMPs from the City's 'Site Management Plan for Stormwater Operations and Maintenance, Appendix A'.
[Storm Report; Pg 9 of 207]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
O&M within the ROW is the responsibility of the City.
[Storm Report; Pg 9 of 207]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-it appears that portions of the frontage improvements, WQ swale, and stream are located in the regulated floodplain per the LOMR dated September 8, 2022. Once confirmed, provide compensatory storage calculations to confirm that the floodplain storage has not been reduced and certify that the work within the floodplain complies with PMC 21.07.
[Storm Report; Pg 10 of 207]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add WDFW HPA.
[Storm Report; Pg 10 of 207]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Enhanced Treatment required.
[Storm Report; Pg 15 of 207]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Use O&M BMPs from the City's 'Site Management Plan for Stormwater Operations and Maintenance, Appendix A'.
[Storm Report; Pg 179 of 207]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Per City Stds 204.5 provide supporting calculation(s) for the sizing of the culvert to convey the 100-yr storm event for the associated tributary basin.
[Storm Report; Pg 193 of 207]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Due to the configuration of the Contech Stormfilter CB, the location of the outlet places the CB perpendicular to the curbline and into the travel lane. City Standards 204.8(11) does not allow solid square lids in the travel lane. Either replace the proprietary square lid with round lids or provide an alternative device (see Old Castle Perk Filter as an example).
[Storm Report; Pg 194 of 207]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
If the proposed biofiltration swale is to be used as part of Enhanced Treatment, then provide a 'stability check' per Ecology reqts.
[Storm Report; Pg 206 of 207]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
The road runoff along Pioneer discharges to a fish bearing stream so Enhanced Treatement is required. Revise the Pioneer water quality features (media filter and bioswale) accordingly.
[Storm Report; Pg 206 of 207]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-Sheet reference.
[Plans; Sht R2.0 of 46]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-Sheet reference.
[Plans; Sht R2.0 of 46]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-Sheet reference.
[Plans; Sht R2.0 of 46]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-Sheet reference.
[Plans; Sht R2.1 of 46]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-Sheet reference.
[Plans; Sht R2.1 of 46]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-Sheet reference.
[Plans; Sht R2.1 of 46]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-Sheet reference.
[Plans; Sht R2.2 of 46]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-Sheet reference.
[Plans; Sht R2.2 of 46]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-Sheet reference.
[Plans; Sht R2.2 of 46]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Sloped perf pipe?
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 46]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-6" perforated?
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 46]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-67.40 IE?
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 46]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Is there a concern with pole stability (streetlights and utility poles) due to saturated soils associated with the dispersion trench during the wet season?
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 46]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-Sheet reference.
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 46]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Cleanout info?
[Plans; Sht R4.1 of 46]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Is there a concern with pole stability (streetlights and utility poles) due to saturated soils associated with the dispersion trench during the wet season?
[Plans; Sht R4.1 of 46]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-IE (68.77?).
[Plans; Sht R4.1 of 46]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-IE (67.40?).
[Plans; Sht R4.1 of 46]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-IE (67.40?).
[Plans; Sht R4.1 of 46]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-Sheet reference.
[Plans; Sht R4.1 of 46]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Curve info (delta/radius/length)?
[Plans; Sht R4.2 of 46]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Curve info (delta/radius/length)?
[Plans; Sht R4.2 of 46]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-Sheet reference.
[Plans; Sht R5.0 of 46]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-missing from planset.
[Plans; Sht R5.0 of 46]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-Sheet reference.
[Plans; Sht R5.0 of 46]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Detail was removed from the planset. Add back.
[Plans; Sht R5.0 of 46]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-Sheet reference.
[Plans; Sht R5.0 of 46]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-Sheet reference.
[Plans; Sht R5.0 of 46]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Revise-01.03.15.
[Plans; Sht R5.0 of 46]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-Sheet reference.
[Plans; Sht R5.0 of 46]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-Sheet reference.
[Plans; Sht R5.0 of 46]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Per 2/11/25 meeting btwn City and ETC team), provide 4.5' landscape strip.
[Plans; Sht R6.4 of 46]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Per 2/11/25 meeting btwn City and ETC team), provide 4.5' landscape strip.
[Plans; Sht R6.4 of 46]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-Leader location.
[Plans; Sht R6.5 of 46]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Revise-cross-slope (if any) should be toward curbline per standards (0%-1.5% max).
[Plans; Sht R6.5 of 46]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Per prior comment-Add Subgrade shall be prepared in accordance with APWA GSP 2-06.3(3).
[Plans; Sht R6.8 of 46]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Per prior comment-Add "Option 1".
[Plans; Sht R6.8 of 46]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add City Standard Details 01.03.07 // 01.03.08 // 01.03.13 back into the planset.
[Plans; Sht PM-05 of 46]
|
|
Public Works Water Review
|
VOID
|
03/25/2025
|
03/07/2025
|
|
|
|
|
Public Works Collection Review
|
VOID
|
03/25/2025
|
03/07/2025
|
|
|
|
|
Planning Review
|
Approved
|
03/25/2025
|
03/05/2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Planning Correction
SEPA: Provide plans to meet SEPA conditions regarding safe routes to schools. SEPA mitigation measures require implementation of a requirement for off-site safe routes to schools improvements. See P-21-0034 SEPA (June 27, 2023). Please provide those plans for further review and agency consultation. 01/09/25 UPDATED NOTES: Its unclear if the applicant has addressed this comment in the current plans to the satisfaction of the city Traffic Engineer. Please provide a detailed, written response upon resubmittal. The resubmittal response document addressed mark ups only.
|
|
Fire Review
|
Approved
|
03/25/2025
|
03/05/2025
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Traffic Review
|
Failed
|
01/17/2025
|
02/06/2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Remove thermoplastic STOP bar from gutter pan.
PM-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Jason Rogge
253-841-5471
PM-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Adjust east/west lane striping to accommodate left turn pocket and shared thru/right turn lane. Shift driveway as needed to align NB/SB left turn pockets.
PM-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Remove right turn arrow
Intersection must be channelized with left turn pocket & shared thru/right pocket.
PM-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Remove right turn arrow
Intersection must be channelized with left turn pocket & shared thru/right pocket.
PM-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Signal plans need to be included in civil plan set.
PM-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Replace with City standard left turn arrow w/ ONLY thermoplastic.
PM-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Replace with City standard left turn arrow w/ ONLY thermoplastic.
PM-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Shift driveway as needed to align NB/SB left turn pockets.
PM-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
remain and point to southern leg of this intersection.
PM-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Should Remain
PM-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Bike Lane sign? W16-9P?
PM-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
W16-9P?
PM-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Why remove this sign?
PM-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Should remain
PM-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
RSSZ flasher
-Coordinate with the City for required hardware & wireless interconnect
-Show condiut/j-box/power source/etc.
-How did the design team determine placement? 300ft from school property would place beacon within signalized intersection.
-Reference applicable WAC with placement/design justification.
-MUTCD compliant advanced signage/pavement markings missing from design
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
RSSZ flasher
-Coordinate with the City for required hardware & wireless interconnect
-Show condiut/j-box/power source/etc.
-Reference applicable WAC with placement/design justification.
-MUTCD compliant advanced signage/pavement markings missing from design
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
As condition with the preliminary site plan approval, the required signal/intersection modifications must be fully configured and operational no less than 2 weeks prior to receiving occupancy for any building on-site. Adaptive signal contractor (Rhythm Engineering) will be required to configure the adaptive system on-site. Adaptive contractor will provide setup/configuration/optimization (not completed by the City). Place this condition on the plans.
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Per the approved preliminary site plan conditions, provide details on overhead fiber connection and how it will be spliced/connected to cabinet.
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Electronic blank out sign not necessary here. During a the phase 4 ped movement, WBL drivers will not be allowed to make a permissive left turn across the crosswalk. Update phasing/coding accordingly. Electronic blank out sign necessary for SB approach (southbound right turning vehicles) Incorporate into design.
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
As condition with the preliminary site plan approval, Flashing yellow arrows with PT/PM phasing required required for EB/WB left turns. Modify phasing as needed
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Adjust east/west lane striping to accommodate left turn pocket and shared thru/right turn lane. To accommodate this phasing, the EBR overlap must be removed
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Adjust east/west lane striping to accommodate left turn pocket and shared thru/right turn lane. Shift driveway as needed to align NB/SB left turn pockets.
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
To accommodate required channelization (left turn pocket and shared thru/right turn lane), EBR overlap must be removed
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
FYA signal head
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
FYA signal head
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Does not appear to be ADA compliant (greater than 10ft from curb)
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
this should be installed on both sides of Shaw Rd (north leg) as there is no crosswalk on north side. Use the appropriate R9-3B signs to direct pedestrians to the south leg crosswalk.
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Remove
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Coordinate with the City on the size/type/model number of electronic blank out sign.
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
J-box over capacity
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Missing EVPE for this leg.
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Swapped?
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Move j-boxes outside of sidewalk
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
R9-3 combo should be installed on both sides of Shaw Rd (north leg)
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Why is there 2-2" here and only 1-2" in Wire note #10?
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Missing wire note for required fiber connection to signal cabinet.
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Missing wire note
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
It appears this equipment is not located within ROW
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Update phasing digram to reflect PT/PM FYA operation for EB/WB.
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
WBL permissive not allowed during phase 4 ped movement. Show this configuration.
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Overhead communication lines will block signal head visibility. Contractor is responsible to raise utility lines as needed. Place note on plans.
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Coordinate with the City of Puyallup for the required Campbell APS unit
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Type PS pole receiving Type PS pole?
|
|
|
See Document Markup
No spares?
|
|
|
See Document Markup
existing
|
|
|
See Document Markup
missing from plan
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Evpe B and D?
|
|
|
See Document Markup
A?
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Swapped?
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify new signage is included for new wind area loading
TS-04
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Update based PT/PM FYA phasing, FYA signage, etc.
TS-04
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Update based PT/PM FYA phasing, FYA signage, overlap removal, electronic blank-out sign, etc.
TS-04
|
|
|
See Document Markup
ADA ramp design and location does not match signal design.
Civil Plans - R2.0
|
|
|
See Document Markup
For WBR movement, provide ESD sight lines to ensure right on-red movements have adequate sight distance
Civil Plans - R2.0
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Shared use path design not consistent with provided in signal design or previously constructed sections on Shaw Rd.
Civil Plans - R2.0
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Utility pole must be relocated farther from intersection. Must be minimum 3ft between face of curb and face of pole
Civil Plans - R2.0
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Updated pavement markings for EB approach missing
Civil Plans - R2.0
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Show locations of City standard streetlights on frontage
Civil Plans - R2.0
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide detailed cost estimate for the Shaw Rd frontage improvements only. Applicant will receive a traffic impact fee credit for the cost to construct frontage on Shaw Rd.
Civil Plans - R2.1
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Remove junction boxes from sidewalk. Replace existing ADA ramps at signal (does not meet City standards)
Civil Plans - R2.1
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Show locations of City standard streetlights on frontage
Civil Plans - R2.0
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Future location must not interfere with future frontage improvements. PSE mounted streetlight to be removed. Lighting to be replaced by City standard lighting.
Civil Plans - R3.1
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Fix abrupt vertical curb alignment
Civil Plans - R4.0
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Per the approved preliminary site plan conditions, the City will require more information regarding the E Pioneer curb alignment. Show additional curb alignment on the west side of Shaw/Pioneer signal (Pioneer Crossing frontage).
Civil Plans - R4.0
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Proposed ROW dedication too large. Only dedicate to back of sidewalk
Civil Plans - R4.0
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Proposed voids in vertical curb is not allowed. Must propose a design alternative that provides a continuous vertical curb along arterial segment.
Civil Plans - R4.0
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify face of curb alignment matches Pioneer Crossing development.
Civil Plans - R4.0
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Show locations of City standard streetlights on frontage
Civil Plans - R4.0
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Extend curb gutter and roadway widening to edge of ROW ~ STA 51+25. Curb identified in red
Civil Plans - R4.1
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Per the approved preliminary site plan conditions, at the discretion of the City, the City may restrict outbound left turns from the E Pioneer access in the future. At the request of the City, the Owners, Heirs, Successors and Assigns agree to renovate and/or improve the driveway access in accordance with the City of Puyallup Municipal Code and Engineering Standards.” Place this note on these plans ????? ????? ? ????
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Per the approved preliminary site plan conditions, during civil design a detailed sight distance analysis will be required at the E Pioneer driveway per City Standards. ESD of 415ft is required at this driveway. Assume 14.5ft setback from the E Pioneer curb alignment and 3.5ft driver eye height.
Civil Plans - R4.1
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Type 3 object marker (OM-3R) per COP 01.03.13
Civil Plans - R4.1
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Start fog line straight taper
STA 50+43.85, 23.00ft RT
Civil Plans - R4.1
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Taper markings per COP 01.03.13
Civil Plans - R4.1
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Start Double yellow CL
STA 50+43.85, 12.00ft RT
Civil Plans - R4.1
|
|
|
See Document Markup
provide 3ft paved shoulder behind fog line
Civil Plans - R4.1
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Show EB right turn pocket.
Civil Plans - R4.1
|
|
|
See Document Markup
connect fog line into existing
Civil Plans - R4.1
|
|
|
See Document Markup
relocate utility pole outside of future sidewalk alignment
Civil Plans - R4.1
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide ADA compliant wheelchair ramp. Not required to extend sidewalk east of the driveway.
Civil Plans - R4.1
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Remove walls from ROW. Locations will conflict from future sidewalk/planter strip alignment. Place ESD sight lines on plans to ensure there's no conflict
Civil Plans - R4.1
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Remove walls from ROW. Will interfere with future sidewalk/planter strip alignment
Civil Plans - R4.1
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide fog line radius to guide vehicles to tapered vehicle path.
Civil Plans - R4.1
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Show locations of City standard streetlights on frontage
Civil Plans - R4.1
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Per the approved preliminary site plan conditions, striping/pavement marking modifications required at Shaw/Pioneer signal. With proposed improvements, EB approach will allow two lanes thru.
Civil Plans - R5.0
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Remove curvature
Civil Plans - R5.0
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Turn pocket markings do not meet City standards. New thermoplastic pavement markings required
Civil Plan - R5.0
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Two EB lane striping not provided
Civil Plans - R5.0
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Per approved preliminary site plan conditions, civil plan set shall provide a detailed channelization plan for all striping & pavement markings in within ROW. All proposed striping shall meet City and MUTCD requirements. Plan shall include signage located in ROW. All City standard details related to pavement markings, striping, sign placement must be provided.
Civil Plans - R5.0
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide right turn pocket striping + arrows -
Civil Plans - R5.0
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide MUTCD compliant "RIGHT LANE MUST TURN RIGHT" signage
Civil Plans - R5.0
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide short interval white skip stripe in advance of solid white gore for right turn pocket
Civil Plans - R5.0
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Channelization?
Civil Plans - R5.0
|
|
|
See Document Markup
details for existing pavement marking removal should be on this sheet
Civil Plans - R5.0
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify lane striping alignment with existing striping on the west side of signal.
Civil Plans - R5.0
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Define ROW dedication offset
Civil Plans - R6.3
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Shared use path design does not match previously constructed sections on Shaw Rd.
Civil Plans - R6.3
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Why is there additional dedication behind sidewalk?
Civil Plans - R6.3
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Update all exhibits with scaled drawings
Civil Plans - R6.3
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Update all exhibits with face of curb offset from roadway CL. Should be 34ft from CL along entire E Pioneer frontage.
Civil Plans - R6.3
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Curb alignment/offset shall be constant along E Pioneer (34ft from CL). No physical taper
Civil Plans - R6.3
|
|
|
See Document Markup
City standard streetlights are required every 150ft (minimum).
Project to provide GE EVOLVE ELR2 Fixtures ERL2-3-23-A3-40-D-Gray-A-V1 (City to provide latest part numbers)
How will lights be powered? New service cabinet? Using the existing signal service cabinet?
Streetlights shall have shorting caps installed with remote photocell located on the service cabinet.
Civil Plans - SL.1
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Existing fixtures to be upgraded to current standard
Civil Plans - SL.1
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Clearly identify as being removed. Existing PSE utility pole mounted streetlights do not meet current City standards and will be removed with installation of City standard streetlights.
Civil Plans - SL.1
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Clearly identify as being removed. Existing PSE utility pole mounted streetlights do not meet current City standards and will be removed with installation of City standard streetlights.
Civil Plans - SL.1
|
|
|
See Document Markup
It is the sole responsibility of the design engineer to ensure streetlight design/placement is outside of the 10ft minimum “safe zone” area. The City will not allow streetlights to be within 10ft of the PSE primary for safety reasons. Place this note on this sheet????? ????? ? ????
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Frontage design not consistent with other sheets in this submittal.
Civil Plans - SL.1
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Streetlight design shall provide the following:
1. Provide details on how streetlights will be powered
2. Location of conduit runs
3. Wiring Schedule
a. Conduit size and type for each raceway
b. Conductors details
4. Pole schedule
a. STA & offset for each luminaire
5. Show location of junction boxes
Civil Plans - SL.1
|
|
|
See Document Markup
This light pole is not existing.
Civil Plans - SL.1
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Photometric analysis needs to account for existing City standard lighting on both sides of the street (including lighting at signalized intersection). Assume utility/PSE mounted streetlights will be removed with project.
Civil Plans - SL.1
|
|
|
See Document Markup
J-box and (2) runs of conduit to extend to southern edge of frontage
Civil Plans - SL.1
|
|
|
See Document Markup
J-box and (2) runs of conduit to extend to southern edge of frontage
Civil Plans - SL.1
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Lighting engineer to verify proposed design will meet or exceed WSDOT light level requirements for pedestrian facilities:
Average(fc): 0.8
Uniformity: 4:1
Civil Plans - SL.1
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Show ESD sight lines at this intersection to ensure there are no obstructions.
Civil Plans - R7.0
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Remove thru/right thermoplastic arrow
Civil Plans - R2.0
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Remove thru/right thermoplastic arrow
Civil Plans - R2.0
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Shared use path design not consistent with previously constructed sections on Shaw Rd. 2ft shoulders are required on each side of path Per WSDOT 1515.04(2)(b)
Civil Plans - R2.0
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Per WSDOT 1515.04(2)(g), verify there are no obstrictions within 1ft of edge of pavement along the entire length of SUP
Civil Plans - R2.0
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Identify existing driveway curb cuts that will be required to be replaced with City standard curb/gutter.
Civil Plans - R2.0
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Updated autoturn analysis for updated intersection geometry/striping. SBR, NBR
Civil Plans - R2.0
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide detailed cost estimate for the Shaw Rd frontage improvements only. Applicant will receive a traffic impact fee credit for the cost to construct frontage on Shaw Rd.
Civil Plans - R2.1
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Remove thru/right thermoplastic arrow
Civil Plans - R2.2
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Remove thru/right thermoplastic arrow
Civil Plans - R2.2
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Sheet missing from match line reference
Civil Plans - R3.2
|
|
|
See Document Markup
This unit will be 30ft light with 12ft arm. Please review comments on street light sheets for relocation requirements.
Civil Plans - R4.0
|
|
|
See Document Markup
This unit will be 30ft light with 12ft arm. Please review comments on street light sheets for relocation requirements.
Civil Plans - R4.0
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Right turn on red sight distance analysis at this location.
Civil Plans - R4.0
|
|
|
See Document Markup
This unit will be 30ft light with 12ft arm. Please review comments on street light sheets for relocation requirements.
Civil Plans - R4.1
|
|
|
See Document Markup
This unit will be 30ft light with 12ft arm. Civil Plans - R4.1
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Reference STOP sign standard detail in plan set
Civil Plans - R5.0
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide single object marker (OM-3R) per COP 01.03.13
Offset 5.5ft from face of curb to avoid sight obstruction from adjacent off-site driveway
Civil Plans - R5.0
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Have radius directly transition into taper fog line without reverse curvature
Civil Plans - R5.0
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Match line stationing is off by about 5ft
Civil Plans - R5.0
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Match existing 30/10 skip striping to the west (01.03.10, D). Shift offset slightly to match existing lane widths, (2) 11ft lanes.
Civil Plans - R5.0
|
|
|
See Document Markup
For striping, pavement markings, and RPM layout within left turn pocket and TWLTL segment, reference City Standard 01.03.6,7,8,9
Civil Plans - R5.0
|
|
|
See Document Markup
For striping, pavement markings, and RPM layout within left/right turn pocket and TWLTL segment, reference City Standard 01.03.6,7,8,9
Civil Plans - R5.0
|
|
|
See Document Markup
move this transition point to STA ~46+86. This will provide a roughly 50/50 split between short interval skip and solid gore (similar to WSDOT M-5.10-03)
Move the arrow/only pavement marking accordingly
Civil Plans - R5.0
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Wide dotted lane per WSDOT M-5.10-03
3ft long, 8" wide thermoplastic bars with 9ft spacing, double RPM between every other stripe
Civil Plans - R5.0
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Remove this only/right arrow combo. Two combos should be sufficient.
Civil Plans - R5.0
|
|
|
See Document Markup
This sign will be blocked by street trees within the 10ft planter strip. Put a note on plans to contact City PW and Engineering staff to help field fit location prior to installation.
Civil Plans - R5.0
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide 2ft shoulder on both sides of 10ft shared use path. Planter strip in this area does not meet WSDOT standards for shared use paths.
Civil Plans - R6.4
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide 2ft shoulder on both sides of 10ft shared use path. Planter strip in this area does not meet WSDOT standards for shared use paths.
Civil Plans - R6.4
|
|
|
See Document Markup
ROW measurements are not scaled properly.
|
|
|
See Document Markup
These measurements are to the north side of meeker southern RR property. This does not represent City of Puyallup ROW limits.
|
|
|
See Document Markup
-Road sections should be split by block as defined in WSDOT stds and IES standards
-Intersections should be individually analyzed as defined in WSDOT stds and IES standards
-Sidewalks should be analyzed in sections as defined in WSDOT stds and IES standards
-Calculation points should be spaced at 5 feet by 5 feet
-Adjust the luminaire arm lengths to be 16 feet to match Shaw Road up the hill
Civil Plans - SL.01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Does the analysis include the all existing lights?
Civil Plans - SL.01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Use city standard 30ft pole with 12ft arm. Place within back of planter strip, front of walk.
Civil Plans - SL.02
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Use city standard 30ft pole with 12ft arm. Incorporate light/j-box into the northern edge of sidewalk panel.
Civil Plans - SL.02
|
|
|
See Document Markup
relocate j-box to this area. Avoid conflicts with future sidewalk.
Civil Plans - SL.02
|
|
|
See Document Markup
The existing arm not long enough for SUP (12ft vs 16ft).
Use 30ft poles with 16ft arms (same design as City constructed shared use path south of 23rd Ave SE).
Use MOSS GREEN (RAL 6005)
Civil Plans - SL.02
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Use 30ft poles with 16ft arms (same design as City constructed shared use path south of 23rd Ave SE).
Use MOSS GREEN (RAL 6005)
Civil Plans - SL.02
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Use 30ft poles with 16ft arms (same design as City constructed shared use path south of 23rd Ave SE).
Use MOSS GREEN (RAL 6005)
Civil Plans - SL.02
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Use 30ft poles with 16ft arms (same design as City constructed shared use path south of 23rd Ave SE).
Use MOSS GREEN (RAL 6005)
Civil Plans - SL.02
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Use 30ft poles with 16ft arms (same design as City constructed shared use path south of 23rd Ave SE).
Use MOSS GREEN (RAL 6005)
Civil Plans - SL.02
|
|
|
See Document Markup
add:
"It is the sole responsibility of the design team to" to the beginning of this note
Civil Plans - SL.02
|
|
|
See Document Markup
might be helpful to show existing lighting/signal conduit/jboxes
Civil Plans - SL.02
|
|
|
See Document Markup
2" conduit
Civil Plans - SL.02
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Must be pole and bracket wire
Civil Plans - SL.02
|
|
|
See Document Markup
bare copper ground not allowed. must be jacketed
Civil Plans - SL.02
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Have these lights connect to the Safeway signal service cabinet
Civil Plans - SL.02
|
|
|
See Document Markup
For the street lights south of intersection, tie into existing illumination conduit/jbox @ intersection... should be located near signal pole
Civil Plans - SL.02
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Keep existing LED streetlight
Civil Plans - SL.02
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Use city standard 30ft pole with 12ft arm. Incorporate light/j-box into the northern edge of sidewalk panel.
Civil Plans - SL.02
|
|
|
See Document Markup
There's existing conduit in this area, Would the contractor be utilizing this existing conduit?
Civil Plans - SL.02
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Have these lights connect to the Shaw/Pioneer signal service cabinet
Civil Plans - SL.02
|
|
|
See Document Markup
STL.01,2,4,5,6 :
Use 30ft poles with 16ft arms same design as City constructed shared use path south of 23rd Ave SE).
Use MOSS GREEN (RAL 6005)
Civil Plans - SL.03
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Update as needed for new/modified circuits.
Civil Plans - SL.03
|
|
|
See Document Markup
For STL.03, keep existing LED at traffic signal
Civil Plans - SL.03
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Needs to be upgraded to green 16ft pole. This pole can be relocated to E Pioneer frontage if in good condition.
Civil Plans - SL.03
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Shorting Caps needed for Streetlights. Lights will be triggered by remote photocell located on service cabinets
Civil Plans - SL.03
|
|
|
See Document Markup
To be used for E Pioneer lights
Civil Plans - SL.10
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Remove arrows for Thru/right movement
Civil Plans - PM-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Remove arrows for Thru/right movement
Civil Plans - PM-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
In this area, sidewalk/planter strip dimensions/alignment not consistent with frontage sheets in this area.
Civil Plans - PM-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Should direct peds south to the nearest crosswalk
Civil Plans - PM-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Should direct peds south to the nearest crosswalk
Civil Plans - PM-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Will be obstructed by S5, maybe S5 should be relocated to back of sidewalk.
Civil Plans - PM-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Given the unusual dimensions of this sign, include guidance on height and offset placement requirements to meet City and ADA requirements
Civil Plans - PM-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
RSSZ flasher
-Reference applicable WAC/RCW with placement/design justification.
-How did the design team determine placement?
-Missing S1-1 advanced warning sign. Include optional S4-3P
-Pavement markings missing from design
-Verify MUTCD compliance
-Coordinate with the City for required hardware & wireless interconnect
PM-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Flashing beacon located ~150ft from NW Christian School. Please provide engineering justification for this placement
PM-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
RSSZ flasher
-Reference applicable WAC/RCW with placement/design justification.
-How did the design team determine placement?
-Missing S1-1 advanced warning sign. Include optional S4-3P
-Pavement markings missing from design
-Verify MUTCD compliance
-Coordinate with the City for required hardware & wireless interconnect
PM-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide MUTCD compliant END SCHOOL ZONE signage with speed limit signage.
PM-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
WAC 468-95-330 School speed limit assembly (S4-1, S4-2, S4-3,
S4-4, S5-1). Pursuant to RCW 46.61.440, paragraph 07 in MUTCD Section
7B.15 is replaced with a Standard to read:
Applicable to state highways, county roads, or city streets, the
reduced school or playground speed zone shall extend for 300 feet in
either direction from the marked crosswalk when the marked crosswalk
is fully posted with standard school speed limit signs or standard
playground speed limit signs.
Applicable to county roads or city streets, the school or playground speed zone may extend up to 300 feet from the border of theschool or playground property when fully posted with standard school
speed limit signs or standard playground speed limit signs. However,
the speed zone may only include the area consistent with active school
or playground use.
No school or playground speed zone may extend less than 300 feet
from a marked school or playground crosswalk, but may extend by traffic regulation beyond 300 feet based on a traffic and engineering investigation.
The speed limit signs shown in Figure 7B-5 shall be located per
RCW 46.61.440.
PM-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Per MUTCD, include S4.5, S1-1+S4-3P in this area. Provide MUTCD complaint spacing measurements.
Civil Plans - PM-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Per MUTCD, include S4.5, S1-1+S4-3P in this area. Provide MUTCD complaint spacing measurements.
Civil Plans - PM-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide MUTCD compliant END SCHOOL ZONE signage with speed limit signage.
PM-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Please verify per MUTCD
Civil Plans - PM-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add "SCHOOL" thermoplastic pavement marking 50ft in advance of beacon
Civil Plans - PM-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add "SCHOOL" thermoplastic pavement marking 50ft in advance of beacon. Markings shall span across both lanes of SB Shaw Rd. May need to shift beacon farther south to provide adequate clearance from signalized intersection.
Civil Plans - PM-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add "SCHOOL" thermoplastic pavement marking 50ft in advance of beacon.
Civil Plans - PM-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Use hydroblasting for marking removal.
PM-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Remove existing white gore and short skip. New lane lines will match existing 30/10 skip striping to the west (01.03.10, D).
PM-02
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Relocate S-1 (35mph speed limit) to this area
PM-02
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Use hydroblasting for marking removal.
PM-02
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide measurement to school property (Shaw Rd Elementary). Should be 300ft
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
RSSZ flasher
-Coordinate with the City for required hardware & wireless interconnect. TAPCO units per PSD requirements. This location can be solar powered since there's no available power source nearby.
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
RSSZ flasher
-Coordinate with the City for required hardware & wireless interconnect. TAPCO units per PSD requirements
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide measurement to school property (NW Christian School)
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
just "SHAW RD"
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
This sign was previously a R9-3A that is now post mounted, S6? This sign H should be removed
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Road name sign should not be mounted between signal heads... should be located over curb line. Use traditional sign (not lighted units)
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Remove. In-lieu of electronic blank out signs, LPI will be used to protect pedestrians in the marked crosswalk (when there's a ped call). TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
These signs do not exist. City does not want these installed
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Sign "E" should be installed in this area for FYA
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Road name sign should not be mounted between signal heads. Remove and install new street name sign "SHAW RD"
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Center 71/41 4-section head on EBL turn pocket (shift 2-3ft north).
Shift 43/42 heads farther north as needed
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Sign "E" should be installed in this area for FYA
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Phase 4/8 diagram confusing. The WB FYA (phase 8) will not run when there's a phase 4 ped call (WBL will show red arrow during phase 8). Alternatively, if there's no ped call on phase 4, the FYA will run during phase 8. Modern 2070 controllers will do this automatically.
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
The City will be adding LPI to phase 4 ped to protect pedestrians in the marked crosswalk from right turn on red conflicts (EBR). The electronic blank out sign will be removed.
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Shift 83 & 84 3-section heads farther south to better align with WBR/WBT approach.
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Evaluate possible options for school zone signage on 12th Ave SE
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Remove 32/82 4-section side fire head
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Remove 32/82 4-section side fire head
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
New heads shall match all others at this intersection.
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Remove. In-lieu of electronic blank out signs, LPI will be used to protect pedestrians in the marked crosswalk (when there's a ped call). TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Missing wire note here. It's my understanding this will be new fiber from the nearby utility pole. Ziply will be adding this connection to this in-ground junction box
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Trench behind walk to tie into existing electical (illumination) jbox and run wire to existing service cabinet. Coordinate new breaker with PW.
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Move sign/beacon to planter for improved visibility. Edge of sign should maintain 2ft clearance from face of curb. Stationing may need to be adjusted to accommodate "SCHOOL" pavement markings.
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Not ADA compliant. Push button too far from roadway. Move ped pole to the top of ped curb to lessen the distance to the road
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
this conduit run is for lighting only. Missing from wire notes. See as-built dwg.
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
This conduit run is for signal conductors only. As built dwg show there are 2-2" conduit. Install all signal wire in there.
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Remove this conduit. The existing jbox is for existing lighting only. no signal unless PW approves otherwise.
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
If you are extending conductors, you will need to rewire back to the controller. No splicing of signal conductors is allowed.
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
push button needs to be within 10 feet of roadway. shift closer to roadway.
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Use Leotek TSL-PED-16-spc-v1
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
shrink path width to 5ft to allow ped button to be shifted farther from roadway. This location is highly susceptible to turning vehicle strikes
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Move ped pole to the front of ped curb to increase the distance to the road. This location is highly susceptible to turning vehicle strikes
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Remove from design sheets.
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Utilize for new lighting circuit TS-02
|
|
|
See Document Markup
only 1-2" needed to pole
TS-02
|
|
|
See Document Markup
this ex is in the lighting conduit? Doesn't match as built dwg.
TS-02
|
|
|
See Document Markup
install this in wire note 15
TS-02
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Is this true? verify.
TS-02
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify all wiring with as built drawing. TS-02
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add:
Fully configured and operational includes adaptive configuration, overhead fiber connectivity, all intersection striping, signal hardware, signage, all on-street lighting, etc. are installed and operational.
TS-02
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Contractor shall verify and confirm all existing poles and foundations will accommodate new loadings. TS-04
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Ensure placement does not obstruct visibility of SB signal heads (62).
TS-05
|
|
|
See Document Markup
New 43 head shall match all other 3 section heads at this intersection (color, dimensions, no backplate, attachment type/bracket, etc.
TS-05
|
|
|
See Document Markup
How is this wired? TS-05
|
|
|
See Document Markup
2
TS-02
|
|
|
See Document Markup
FYA signs? TS-04
|
|
|
See Document Markup
51?
TS-04
|
|
|
See Document Markup
40?
TS-04
|
|
|
See Document Markup
too far out. More like 20?
TS-04
|
|
|
See Document Markup
verify TS-04
|
|
|
See Document Markup
FYA signs? TS-04
|
|
Public Works Streets Review
|
Failed
|
01/17/2025
|
01/30/2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Document Markup
this is not a "single ramp" R2.0 sheet 4 SH
|
|
|
See Document Markup
CB in pedestrian pathway/crosswalk R2.0 sheet 4 SH
|
|
|
See Document Markup
HMA restoration single lane grind/overlay R2.0 sheet 4 SH
|
|
|
See Document Markup
this is a streetlight not a power pole R3.0 sheet 6 SH
|
|
|
See Document Markup
streetlight removed & relocated by others, who is others R3.1 sheet 7 SH
|
|
|
See Document Markup
grind/overlay one lane width R4.0 sheet 8 SH
|
|
|
See Document Markup
2" grind/ overlay, end square, not a point R4.1 sheet 9 SH
|
|
|
See Document Markup
2" grind/overlay R6.3 sheet 14 SH
|
|
|
See Document Markup
2" grind/overlay to lane line, end square R6.3 sheet 14 SH
|
|
|
See Document Markup
sight distance concerns, do these impede on meeting sight distance requirements, what type of tree/plantings are these, what root barrier or sidewalk damage protection will be used R7 sheet 17 SH
|
|
|
See Document Markup
show what streetlights are existing and what are new. previous page states remove and relocate streetlight/power pole, which ones will be moved, verify conduit continuity and ability to maintain and pull wire if needed, add extra 2" spare conduit throughout width of project, our standard states schedule 80 conduit under roads/driveway...has this been verified it exist, if not replace with schedule 80 across entrance & , verify and state existing wire size and it meets current standards.... SL.1 SH
|
|
|
See Document Markup
signal tech phone number is 253-341-8439
|
|
|
See Document Markup
is this the same one on sheet 7 that says relocate, if it going to be removed why does the sidewalk curve around it SL-1 SH
|
|
|
See Document Markup
show actual location of new underground conduit, in right-of-way SL.1 SH
|
|
|
See Document Markup
show where J-box location will be, armorcast J-boxes should be used.. SL.1 SH
|
|
|
See Document Markup
|
|
|
See Document Markup
|
|
|
See Document Markup
|
|
|
See Document Markup
|
|
|
See Document Markup
|
|
|
See Document Markup
|
|
|
See Document Markup
|
|
|
See Document Markup
|
|
|
See Document Markup
|
|
|
See Document Markup
|
|
|
See Document Markup
|
|
|
See Document Markup
remove/replace existing driveway curb cuts with new C&G, expand single lane grind/overlay to this extents SH R2.0
|
|
|
See Document Markup
continue single lane improvement around corner where road is cut for new C&G SH R4.0
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Over 2% , non compliant
SH R4.2
|
|
|
See Document Markup
will this puddle here
SH R4.2
|
|
|
See Document Markup
1 1/4" minimum conduit size per City Standard
SH SL.02
|
|
|
See Document Markup
remove blank out sign
SH TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
show conduit, AC power preferred for this one
SH TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
|
|
Engineering Civil Review
|
Failed
|
01/17/2025
|
01/29/2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Document Markup
There's also a much larger tributary basin east of the project site which also contributes flows to the roadside channel along Pioneer.
[Storm Report; Pg 7 of 207]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Please add "currently being" here.
[Storm Report; Pg 7 of 207]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
"passes through multiple culverts along the property frontage before being split into two separate piped systems which ultimately discharge to the roadside channel on the north side of Pioneer. The first piped system consists of two pipes adjacent to each other, 12in and 18in ductilie iron, which crosses Pioneer just east of the intersection. The CB's connected to these pipes are located within the travel lane with the CB connected to the 18in pipe currently buried under pavement. The other CB is visible with a solid lid. The second pipe system crosses Shaw Road westerly before turning northwest in a buried structure and discharging to the Pioneer north channel on the west side of Shaw Road."
[Storm Report; Pg 7 of 207]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
"Deer Creek and"
[Storm Report; Pg 7 of 207]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
"the southside of "
[Storm Report; Pg 7 of 207]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
The road runoff along Pioneer discharges to a fish bearing stream so Enhanced Treatement is required. Revise the Pioneer water quality features (media filter and bioswale) accordingly.
[Storm Report; Pg 7 of 207]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Enhanced treatment required. Revise accordingly.
[Storm Report; Pg 7 of 207]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
See comments under Section 2.2 and revise accordingly.
[Storm Report; Pg 8 of 207]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Please add "existing wetpond constructed during the Shaw Road CIP".
[Storm Report; Pg 8 of 207]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Enhanced Treatment required.
[Storm Report; Pg 9 of 207]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Use O&M BMPs from the City's 'Site Management Plan for Stormwater Operations and Maintenance, Appendix A'.
[Storm Report; Pg 9 of 207]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
O&M within the ROW is the responsibility of the City.
[Storm Report; Pg 9 of 207]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-it appears that portions of the frontage improvements, WQ swale, and stream are located in the regulated floodplain per the LOMR dated September 8, 2022. Once confirmed, provide compensatory storage calculations to confirm that the floodplain storage has not been reduced and certify that the work within the floodplain complies with PMC 21.07.
[Storm Report; Pg 10 of 207]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add WDFW HPA.
[Storm Report; Pg 10 of 207]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Enhanced Treatment required.
[Storm Report; Pg 15 of 207]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Use O&M BMPs from the City's 'Site Management Plan for Stormwater Operations and Maintenance, Appendix A'.
[Storm Report; Pg 179 of 207]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Per City Stds 204.5 provide supporting calculation(s) for the sizing of the culvert to convey the 100-yr storm event for the associated tributary basin.
[Storm Report; Pg 193 of 207]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Due to the configuration of the Contech Stormfilter CB, the location of the outlet places the CB perpendicular to the curbline and into the travel lane. City Standards 204.8(11) does not allow solid square lids in the travel lane. Either replace the proprietary square lid with round lids or provide an alternative device (see Old Castle Perk Filter as an example).
[Storm Report; Pg 194 of 207]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
If the proposed biofiltration swale is to be used as part of Enhanced Treatment, then provide a 'stability check' per Ecology reqts.
[Storm Report; Pg 206 of 207]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
The road runoff along Pioneer discharges to a fish bearing stream so Enhanced Treatement is required. Revise the Pioneer water quality features (media filter and bioswale) accordingly.
[Storm Report; Pg 206 of 207]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide DRAFT ROW dedication deed along Pioneer Way frontage, including sketch, on City Form. 34ft road width from centerline, 10ft planter, and 8ft sidewalk. Once approved, record with the Pierce County Auditor.
[Plans; Sht R0.0 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Please remove Notes 2 and 5 (not relevant to this permit application).
[Plans; Sht R0.0 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Revise floodplain delineation based on approved LOMR.
[Plans; Sht R0.0 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Revise per comments on Sht R6.3.
[Plans; Sht 1 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add the following notes to the planset:?????????? ?????? ????????? ???? ??? ?? ???????? ???? ???????? ???????? ???????????? ????? ?? ????????? ?? ????????? ?? ???? ??? ?????????? ????? ?????? ??? ??????? ?????????????
•Existing private utilities (power, gas, telcom, cable, etc…) that are in conflict with City maintained right-of-way and utilities shall be relocated outside of the travelled road section, i.e., behind the curb under the sidewalk area or other location as approved by the City. ??????? ??? ?? ?? ???
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add the following notes to the planset:?????????? ?????? ????????? ???? ??? ?? ???????? ???? ???????? ???????? ???????????? ????? ?? ????????? ?? ????????? ?? ???? ??? ?????????? ????? ?????? ??? ??????? ?????????????
•Existing private utilities (power, gas, telcom, cable, etc…) that are in conflict with City maintained right-of-way and utilities shall be relocated outside of the travelled road section, i.e., behind the curb under the sidewalk area or other location as approved by the City. ??????? ??? ?? ?? ???
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Clarify what is happening with existing sidewalk, ramps, and utilities.
[Plans; Sht R1.1 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide Type III Barricade per CS 01.02.20.
[Plans; Sht R2.0 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Revise-see shared use path x-section.
[Plans; Sht R2.0 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add-"Permit PRCCP20230970".
[Plans; Sht R2.0 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify leader location.
[Plans; Sht R2.0 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide spot elevations at corners of ramps and landing and at the corners where the DWS meets the flowline.
[Plans; Sht R2.0 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide the following information for the approach:
-Centerline stationing
-curb radii, curve length, and delta angle
-flowline elevations at PC, PT, and 1/4-points of radius
-Drive aisle width at throat
[Plans; Sht R2.0 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide valley gutter flowline elevations at each end and 50ft oc.
[Plans; Sht R2.0 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide easement right or dedicate ROW to the City for ADA ramp and signal
[Plans; Sht R2.0 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide spot elevations at corners of the ramp and landing and at the corners where the DWS meets the flowline.
[Plans; Sht R2.0 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Show shared use path transition to ADA ramp. Provide non-hardscape area adjacent to ramp pedestrian curbs.
[Plans; Sht R2.0 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Transition shared use path to ADA ramp.
[Plans; Sht R2.0 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add note that shared use path to be pervious pavement per details/ on Sheets R6.3 and R6.5, but ADA ramps to be convential concrete pavement.
[Plans; Sht R2.0 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Show steet light locations along frontage.
[Plans; Sht R2.0 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout min. 3ft clear btwn face of pole and face of curb. Relocate if necessary.
[Plans; Sht R2.0 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
See comment on 4/R6.2.
[Plans; Sht R2.1 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide spot elevations at corners of ramps and landing and at the corners where the DWS meets the flowline.
[Plans; Sht R2.1 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide the following information for the approach:
-Centerline stationing
-curb radii, curve length, and delta angle
-flowline elevations at PC, PT, and 1/4-points of radius
-Drive aisle width at throat
[Plans; Sht R2.1 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide easement right or dedicate ROW to the City for ADA ramp located outside ROW.
[Plans; Sht R2.1 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add-"Permit PRCCP20230970".
[Plans; Sht R2.1 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Revise-see shared use path x-section.
[Plans; Sht R2.1 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Show shared use path transition to ADA ramp. Provide non-hardscape area adjacent to ramp pedestrian curbs.
[Plans; Sht R2.1 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout to transition shared use path to 8ft sidewalk. Ensure that any areas of the shared use path that butt to the high side of a pedestrian curb are not hardscape (hardscape creates potential tripping hazards.)
[Plans; Sht R2.1 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Existing ADA ramps are non-compliant (cross-slopes, ramp lengths, etc.) and must be replaced. Adjust/relocate existing utilities which are in conflict with revised curb ramp designs. Provide detail(s) of proposed ramps with spot elevations at the corners of ramps, landings, and at the corners where the DWS meets the flowline.
[Plans; Sht R2.1 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout proposed ROW radius.
[Plans; Sht R2.1 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout contour elevations adjacent to the corner.
[Plans; Sht R2.1 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Relocate proposed pedestrian curb to back of walk.
[Plans; Sht R2.1 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Remove and replace existing non-standard sidewalk.
[Plans; Sht R2.1 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Transition shared use path to ADA ramp.
[Plans; Sht R2.1 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add note that shared use path to be pervious pavement per details/ on Sheets R6.3 and R6.5, but ADA ramps to be convential concrete pavement.
[Plans; Sht R2.1 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Show steet light locations along frontage.
[Plans; Sht R2.1 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Relocate existing steet light to provide min. 24" clear from face of curb.
[Plans; Sht R2.1 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Clarify-Keynote 4 is also being used for existing light standard and j-boxes at the intersection.
[Plans; Sht R3.0 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add the following notes to the planset:?????????? ?????? ????????? ???? ??? ?? ???????? ???? ???????? ???????? ???????????? ????? ?? ????????? ?? ????????? ?? ???? ??? ?????????? ????? ?????? ??? ??????? ?????????????
•Existing private utilities (power, gas, telcom, cable, etc…) that are in conflict with City maintained right-of-way and utilities shall be relocated outside of the travelled road section, i.e., behind the curb under the sidewalk area or other location as approved by the City. ??????? ??? ??? ?? ???
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout watermain to be removed per Civil Permit PRCCP20230970.
[Plans; Sht R3.0 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Jboxes to be relocated due to ADA ramp replacements.
[Plans; Sht R3.0 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add the following notes to the planset:?????????? ?????? ????????? ???? ??? ?? ???????? ???? ???????? ???????? ???????????? ????? ?? ????????? ?? ????????? ?? ???? ??? ?????????? ????? ?????? ??? ??????? ?????????????
•Existing private utilities (power, gas, telcom, cable, etc…) that are in conflict with City maintained right-of-way and utilities shall be relocated outside of the travelled road section, i.e., behind the curb under the sidewalk area or other location as approved by the City. ??????? ??? ??? ?? ???
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify "Note 4" reference.
[Plans; Sht R3.1 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Indicate and callout regulated floodplain. Provide compensatory storage calculations to confirm that the floodplain storage has not been reduced and certify that the work within the floodplain complies with PMC 21.07.
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
The proposed biofiltration swale only provides Basic Treatment. Enhanced Treatment is required due to discharge to the regulated stream. Revise WQ design accordingly.
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
City Standards require a storm main at curbline. Any deviation from the standard will require review and approval of the City Engineer via the AMR process.
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Identify elevation callouts.
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Wall to be located outside of ROW on private property.
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout contour elevations.
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
See comment Sheet R6.2.
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Revise culvert length per HPA permit.
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Revise culvert length per HPA permit.
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout rip-rap pad dimensions and thickness-if part of final design.
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Show existing buried CB adjacent to CB D4-10697.
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
See comment Sheet R6.2.
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Revise for Enhanced Treatment.
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
In an effort to remove the culvert outside of the road section as well as tie-in a new storm main serving Pioneer Way and a future extension beyond the project limits; place a new CB at the existing culvert end with a storm main eastward and stub a new pipe out the back for the connection to the culvert.
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Show maintenance access per comments on 2/R6.2.
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide debris screen at culvert entrance. Bars to be spaced approximately 12in oc.
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Revise per final design.
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout TW/BW elevations.
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
See City Stds 204.3 for storm pipe sizing criteria.
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
See City Stds 204.8 for maximum gutter run.
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide flowline elevations at 50ft oc.
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout proposed ROW radius.
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Sawcut existing pavement to nearest proposed northerly lane line. Provide full depth road section per City Standard Detail 01.01.19 with cross-slope noted on plan at 100ft intervals (max). Maintain x-slope btwn 2% and 5%.
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Buried stormwater structure-raise to grade and provide ring and cover.
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Grind and overlay existing lane beyond sawcut to match new full-depth road section.
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Show steet light locations along frontage.
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide CB with stub to the east for future connection. Plug stub end.
[Plans; Sht R4.1 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide the following information for the approach:
-Centerline stationing
-curb radii, curve length, and delta angle
-flowline elevations at PC, PT, and 1/4-points of radius
-Drive aisle width at throat
[Plans; Sht R4.1 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Walls are not allowed within the ROW without an approved AMR. If the walls cannot be eliminated, submit an AMR for City Engineer review and approval.
[Plans; Sht R4.1 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide callout. Ensure relocated pole is within future planter strip.
[Plans; Sht R4.1 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide detail of ADA ramp with spot elevations at corners of the ramp and landing and at the corners where the DWS meets the flowline.
[Plans; Sht R4.1 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
See City Stds 204.8 for maximum gutter run.
[Plans; Sht R4.1 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide valley gutter flowline elevations at each end and 50ft oc.
[Plans; Sht R4.1 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
See comments Sht R4.0.
[Plans; Sht R4.1 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Identify elevation callouts.
[Plans; Sht R4.1 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide flowline elevations at 50ft oc.
[Plans; Sht R4.1 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout and show existing EP btwn 51+00 and 53+00.
[Plans; Sht R4.1 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Is this a new headwall? Clarify work to be done to tie proposed stream to existing culvert end.
[Plans; Sht R4.1 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Sawcut existing pavement to nearest proposed lane line. Provide full depth road section per City Standard Detail 01.01.19 with cross-slope noted on plan at 100ft intervals (max). Maintain x-slope btwn 2% and 5%.
[Plans; Sht R4.1 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
End full-depth road section.
[Plans; Sht R4.1 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout contour elevations.
[Plans; Sht R4.1 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Grind and overlay existing lane beyond sawcut to match new full-depth road section.
[Plans; Sht R4.1 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide ADA ramp for future tie-in of sidewalk. Provide detail of ADA ramp with spot elevations at corners of the ramp and landing and at the corners where the DWS meets the flowline.
[Plans; Sht R4.1 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Show steet light locations along frontage.
[Plans; Sht R4.1 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide stiping info for the approach.
[Plans; Sht R5.0 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Prior to Occupancy, execute and record “Private Road Maintenance Agreement” (for maintenance of private striping within the ROW) on form approved by the City Attorney. ??????? ??? ??? ?? ??
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Remove reference to Pierce County standard.
[Plans; Sht R6.1 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Notes 13 and 14 aren't applicable to this project.
[Plans; Sht R6.1 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Examples of curb ramp designs with spot elevations...reference comments on frontage plans.
[Plans; Sht R6.1 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout the following information for the WQ swale:
-grass seed mix criteria
-thickness of amended soil
-amended soil composition criteria
-filter fabric wrap reqts.
-drain rock thickness above/below underdrain
-indicate groundwater elev (El. 69.84) in relation to the x-section
-indicate synthetic impermeable liner and provide criteria
[Plans; Sht R6.2 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Confirm 5/8" minus per Ecology.
[Plans; Sht R6.2 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout grass on the side slopes.
[Plans; Sht R6.2 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Curb cut cannot be allowed on Pioneer due to traffic volume and speed. In the past, the City has approved for use the Neenah Foundry Curb Box R-3165. If this through-curb inlet works for the proposed design it can be incorporated into the planset. Other alternatives would likely require discussion and approval using the Alternative Methods Request (AMR) process.
[Plans; Sht R6.2 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Enhanced Treatment required for Pioneer. The comments below are provided in case the biofiltration swale will still be utilized as part of a treatment train.
[Plans; Sht R6.2 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Due to the configuration of the Contech Stormfilter CB, the location of the outlet places the CB perpendicular to the curbline and into the travel lane. City Standards 204.8(11) does not allow solid square lids in the travel lane. Either replace the proprietary square lid with round lids or provide an alternative device (see Old Castle Perk Filter as an example).
[Plans; Sht R6.2 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add-HPA culvert cross-sections to the planset.
[PH2 CFG Plans; Sht C1.00]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide CIP or prefab end wall. If CIP call out reinforcting req'ts. (See example above as one possible alternative).
[Plans; Sht R6.2 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide maintenance access above pipe-culvert tie-in. (See example above as on possible alternative).
[Plans; Sht R6.2 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-HPA culvert details indicate 2ft tall interior height.
[Plans; Sht R6.2 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout and show 12in min. shoulder per Standards.
[Plans; Sht R6.3 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Locate ROW at back of walk per standards.
[Plans; Sht R6.3 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Revise to reflect Shared Use Path design...see right.
[Plans; Sht R6.3 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Revise-Existing ROW varies from 65' to 90' btwn 9+20 to 11+76, and varies from 93' to 99' btwn 13+26 to 15+90.
[Plans; Sht R6.3 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add- "17ft".
[Plans; Sht R6.3 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Revise-Existing ROW varies from 90' to 93' btwn 11+76 to 13+26.
[Plans; Sht R6.3 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Revise-Existing dim'n is 30' 11+76 to 13+20; 33' 13+20 to 13+26.
[Plans; Sht R6.3 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add- "17ft".
[Plans; Sht R6.3 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
3ft per CS 01.02.19.
[Plans; Sht R6.3 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
ROW varies btwn Sta 45+00 and Sta 48+75. See AFN 9408230215 and revise accordingly.
[Plans; Sht R6.3 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide 34ft curb to CL.
[Plans; Sht R6.3]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Determine proposed ROW dedication using 34ft btwn curb and centerline and callout dimension on the x-section.
[Plans; Sht R6.3 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide 34ft curb to CL.
[Plans; Sht R6.3]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
See comments on Detail 1 above.
[Plans; Sht R6.3 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Revise lane dimensioning for 34ft cross-section.
[Plans; Sht R6.3 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Revise lane dimensioning for 34ft cross-section.
[Plans; Sht R6.3 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add "pervious".
[Plans; Sht R6.3 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add City Std Details:
01.01.05 // 01.01.11 // 01.01.18 // 01.02.02 (strike Note 7 due to pervious concrete) // 01.02.03 // 01.02.08a // 01.02.16 // 01.02.19 // 01.02.20 // 01.03.06 // 01.03.13 // 01.03.14 // 01.03.15 // 01.04.01 // 01.04.02
|
|
|
See Document Markup
3ft per CS 01.02.19.
[Plans; Sht R6.5 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Revise per Shared Use Path comments (Sht R6.3) and Planning Dept comments.
[Plans; Sht R7.0 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout plantings per Planning Dept criteria. Callout root barriers for any trees planted within the ROW.
[Plans; Sht R7.0 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add the following to Note 6:????? ? ???? ?? ??? ???? ???????????? ????? ?? ???????? ?? ??? ?????? ?????? ?????????? ????? ?? ??????????????
-“6b. Contractor shall contact the City’s signal technician when the lights are ready to be energized.”??????? ??? ??? ?? ??
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify Sch. 80 PVC conduit at approach. Replace if necessary.
[Plans; Sht SL.1 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
If underground conduit at new approach, confirm Sch. 80 PVC conduit or replace if necessary.
[Plans; Sht SL.1 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
At proposed City light standard locations, encapsulate the light base into the sidewalk and/or shared use path pour.
[Plans; Sht SL.1 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Grind and Overlay one lane width.
[Plans; Sht R2.1 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
See comments on Sht R6.2.
[Plans; Sht R6.3 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Full depth road section per City Standard 01.01.05.
[Plans; Sht R6.3 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Full depth road section per City Standard 01.01.05.
[Plans; Sht R6.3 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Coordinate paving section with comments on Sht R4.0 and R4.1.
[Plans; Sht R6.3 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Coordinate paving section with comments on Sht R4.0 and R4.1.
[Plans; Sht R6.3 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Indicate and callout regulated floodplain. Provide compensatory storage calculations to confirm that the floodplain storage has not been reduced and certify that the work within the floodplain complies with PMC 21.07.
[Plans; Sht R4.1 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Maintain curb and gutter alignment along Pioneer to east property line.
[Plans; Sht R4.1 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add the following notes to the planset:
-Existing public utilities that are in conflict with proposed frontage improvements shall be relocated as necessary to meet all applicable City, State, and Federal requirements.
-Existing private utilities (power, gas, telcom, cable, etc...) that are in conflict with City maintained right-of way and utilities shall be relocated outside of the travelled road section, i.e., behind the curb under the sidewalk area or other location as approved by the City.
[Plans; Sht R1.0 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add the following notes to the planset:
-Existing public utilities that are in conflict with proposed frontage improvements shall be relocated as necessary to meet all applicable City, State, and Federal requirements.
-Existing private utilities (power, gas, telcom, cable, etc...) that are in conflict with City maintained right-of way and utilities shall be relocated outside of the travelled road section, i.e., behind the curb under the sidewalk area or other location as approved by the City.
[Plans; Sht R1.1 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add the following notes to the planset:
-Existing public utilities that are in conflict with proposed frontage improvements shall be relocated as necessary to meet all applicable City, State, and Federal requirements.
-Existing private utilities (power, gas, telcom, cable, etc...) that are in conflict with City maintained right-of way and utilities shall be relocated outside of the travelled road section, i.e., behind the curb under the sidewalk area or other location as approved by the City.
[Plans; Sht R3.0 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add the following notes to the planset:
-Existing public utilities that are in conflict with proposed frontage improvements shall be relocated as necessary to meet all applicable City, State, and Federal requirements.
-Existing private utilities (power, gas, telcom, cable, etc...) that are in conflict with City maintained right-of way and utilities shall be relocated outside of the travelled road section, i.e., behind the curb under the sidewalk area or other location as approved by the City.
[Plans; Sht R3.1 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Prior to Occupancy, execute and record "Private Road Maintenance Agreement" (for maintenance of private striping within the ROW) on form approved by the City Attorney.
[Plans; Sht R5.0 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add the following to Note 6:
-"6a. A copy of the load calculations shall be provided to the City's signal technician prior to installation.
-"6b. Contractor shall contact the City's signal technician when the lights are ready to be energized."
[Plans; Sht SL.1 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add City Std Details:
02.01.05 // 06.01.01 // 06.01.02
[Plans; Sht R6.2 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify leader location (noted floodplain is beyond project limits).
[Storm Report; Pg 59 of 273]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Remove this section.
[Storm Report; Pg 186 of 273]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Remove this section.
[Storm Report; Pg 188 of 273]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Clarify-is this the existing 8in pipe to be removed?
[Storm Report; Pg 229 of 273]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Clarify-how can there be 6in of ponding on a 25% slope?
[Storm Report; Pg 256 of 273]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add the following City Standard Notes:
-General (See CS 2.4)
-Grading, Erosion, and Sedimentation (See CS 505)
-Roadway (See CS 104)
-Stormwater (See CS 207)
[Plans; Sht R0.0 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Delete.
[Plans; Sht R1.0 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
This detail does not apply within the ROW. Use City Standard pavement section.
[Plans; Sht R2.0 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Use City Std pavement section w/in the ROW per callout on City Std Detail 01.02.16.
[Plans; Sht R2.0 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add detail reference for Shared Use Path PHMA on PATB.
[Plans; Sht R2.0 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Shared Use Path shall be PHMA on PATB.
[Plans; Sht R2.0 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add detail reference for Shared Use Path PHMA on PATB.
[Plans; Sht R2.1 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
This detail does not apply within the ROW. Use City Standard pavement section.
[Plans; Sht R2.1 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Shared Use Path shall be PHMA on PATB.
[Plans; Sht R2.1 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Per subsequent conversation with Public Works, revise ROW dedication as shown. Submit an easement on City form for review and approval associated with City maintenance of the traffic signal/equpment and ADA ramps (portion located on private property) at the Shaw Road entrance. Upon approval, record the easement with the Pierce County auditor. (Easement form is available on the Development Engineering webpage in Appendix C of the City Standards.)
[Plans; Sht R2.2 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
This detail does not apply within the ROW. Use City Standard pavement section.
[Plans; Sht R2.0 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Use City Std pavement section w/in the ROW per callout on City Std Detail 01.02.16.
[Plans; Sht R2.0 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Confirm-callout location.
[Plans; Sht R2.2 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Max. x-slope is 2% per City Stds and PROWAG. Revise landing accordingly.
[Plans; Sht R2.2 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide spot elevation at this point. Double-check 5% max grade btwn valley flowline and spot elevation w/in confines of the crosswalk.
[Plans; Sht R2.2 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
This elevation exceeds the max. allowable grade (5% for x-walks) btwn the curb and valley gutter flowline. Revise accodingly.
[Plans; Sht R2.2 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Revise-per grade comment above.
[Plans; Sht R2.2 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Clarify-how does this area not hold runoff (pond)? FG adjacent to the pedestrian curb and at 1/4 radius is EL 70.30, but the edge of the valley gutter is El 70.46 to 70.38 and valley flowline is El 70.42 to El 70.36 (approx Sta 12+96.6 to 13+03.7)
[Plans; Sht R2.2 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add detail reference for Shared Use Path PHMA on PATB.
[Plans; Sht R2.2 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
NTE-not identified on the Shaw Road detail.
[Plans; Sht R2.2 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Legibility.
[Plans; Sht R2.2 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Is this centerline of approach? If not, indicate centerline.
[Plans; Sht R2.2 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Identify PC/PT stations (typ).
[Plans; Sht R2.2 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
??
[Plans; Sht R2.2 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout scale for this detail.
[Plans; Sht R2.2 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Reference.
[Plans; Sht R3.0 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Reference.
[Plans; Sht R3.0 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Reference.
[Plans; Sht R3.1 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Relocate existing handhole outside of new road section.
[Plans; Sht R3.1 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Reference.
[Plans; Sht R3.1 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
This detail does not apply within the ROW. Use City Standard pavement section.
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-PVC.
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Per prior comment-Show existing buried CB adjacent to CB D4-10697.
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Show 100yr floodplain on profile (per Sept 8, 2022 LOMR).
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify pipe sizing and identify pipe as being perforated.
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Use DI pipe due to shallow bury. (Typ)
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Depth of bury for pole foundation shall be measured from bottom of wall to bottom of foundation unless separate structural design provided.
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify top of pipe elev with curb inlet dimensions for constructability.
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Clarify-type of retaining wall?
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Clarify-station.
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Per CWatt email dated 01-23-25, adjust flowline profile to 0.4%.
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-sheet reference.
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-storm calcs require 300lf of CAVFS. Only 272lf provided.
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout grade board elevation
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout-CO-R7?
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-Out?
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-Out?
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-Out?
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide detail for the debris barrier.
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Pipe to the west?
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Confirm-IE.
[Plans; Sht R4.1 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Clarify-type of retaining wall?
[Plans; Sht R4.1 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Use DI pipe for curb inlet crossings due to shallow bury. (Typ)
[Plans; Sht R4.1 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify top of pipe elev with curb inlet dimensions for constructability. (typ)
[Plans; Sht R4.1 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Identify "perforated" pipes on profile.
[Plans; Sht R4.1 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout grade board elevation
[Plans; Sht R4.1 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify callout.
[Plans; Sht R4.1 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
This detail does not apply within the ROW. Use City Standard pavement section.
[Plans; Sht R4.1 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-Keynote 7?
[Plans; Sht R4.1 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Per City-AHBL email exchange dated 01-24-25:
-verify perf pipe sizing.
-reduce planter strip to 3.5ft to allow 12in wide gravel spreader adjacent to dispersion trench.
-provide 1ft elevation difference btwn flowline and top of grade board.
-provide downturned ells into the sump on the dispersion trench perf pipes.
-provide backwater analysis between flowline and the dispersion trench up to the 50 year event to ensure no new flooding of the roadway.
[Plans; Sht R4.1 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-storm calcs require 300lf of CAVFS. Only 272lf provided.
[Plans; Sht R4.1 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-Out?
[Plans; Sht R4.1 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-Out?
[Plans; Sht R4.1 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-Out?
[Plans; Sht R4.1 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Confirm-IE.
[Plans; Sht R4.1 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Per CWatt email dated 01-23-25, adjust flowline profile to 0.4%.
[Plans; Sht R4.1 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Revise flowline elevations for 0.4% profile. (Typ).
[Plans; Sht R4.2 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Confirm-IE.
[Plans; Sht R4.2 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Readability.
[Plans; Sht R4.2 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Identify PC/PT.
[Plans; Sht R4.2 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
See comments on Sheet R4.0 and R4.1.
[Plans; Sht R4.2 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout barricade per City Std Detail 01.02.20.
[Plans; Sht R4.2 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Revise-max. x-slope is 2%.
[Plans; Sht R4.2 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
This detail does not apply within the ROW. Use City Standard pavement section.
[Plans; Sht R4.2 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Use City Std pavement section w/in the ROW per callout on City Std Detail 01.02.16.
[Plans; Sht R4.2 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout barricade per City Std Detail 01.02.20.
[Plans; Sht R5.0 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Clarify-is this the existing 8in pipe to be removed?
[Plans; Sht R6.2 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Clarify-outlet pipe.
[Plans; Sht R6.2 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add Note: "Soil-Compost Mix shall be in accordance with the Ecology Manual, BMP T7.40. Provide manufacturer's or supplier's certification and soil analysis to the City prior to placement of the soil-compost mix."...or similar language.
[Plans; Sht R6.2 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Please extend dimn line or adjust callout leader.
[Plans; Sht R6.4 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Clarify-Existing 1/2-ROW to centerline is:
-35' btwn 9+20 and 9+86;
-60' btwn 9+86 and 11+82.
[Plans; Sht R6.4 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Identify-"Existing ROW".
[Plans; Sht R6.4 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Clarify-2.6ft? (vs 2ft)
[Plans; Sht R6.4 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Revise to "10.00' Permeable HMA Sidewalk".
[Plans; Sht R6.4 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-Dedication width (16' vs 16.6')?
[Plans; Sht R6.4 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Please extend dimn line or adjust callout leader.
[Plans; Sht R6.4 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Revise to "10.00' Permeable HMA Sidewalk".
[Plans; Sht R6.4 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Clarify-2.6ft? (vs 2ft)
[Plans; Sht R6.4 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-Dedication width (13' vs 13.6')?
[Plans; Sht R6.4 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout cross-slope.
[Plans; Sht R6.4 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout cross-slope.
[Plans; Sht R6.4 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Revise detail callout for PHMA.
[Plans; Sht R6.4 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Revise detail callout for PHMA.
[Plans; Sht R6.4 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
The Shared Use Path (10ft section) shall be in accordance with the materials and thicknesses indicated for the existing Shaw Road Shared Use. See additional comment on Sheet R6.8.
[Plans; Sht R6.4 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Coordinate w/ Pavement Marking Plans.
[Plans; Sht R6.4 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Coordinate lane dim'ns w/ Pavement Marking Plans.
[Plans; Sht R6.4 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-the legal description on the draft dedication document appears to indicate 18.8'.
[Plans; Sht R6.4 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Please extend dimn line or adjust callout leader.
[Plans; Sht R6.5 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
This detail does not apply within the ROW. Use City Standard pavement section.
[Plans; Sht R6.5 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout top of grade board elevation.
[Plans; Sht R6.5 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
This detail does not apply within the ROW. Use City Standard pavement section.
[Plans; Sht R6.5 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Please extend dimn line or adjust callout leader.
[Plans; Sht R6.5 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Please extend dimn line or adjust callout leader.
[Plans; Sht R6.5 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Clarify-Is there a set dimension for the wall off back of walk?
[Plans; Sht R6.5 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-City records indicate a 60ft existing ROW. Is there a recorded instrument that indicates otherwise?
[Plans; Sht R6.5 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-City records indicate a 75ft existing ROW. Is there a recorded instrument that indicates otherwise?
[Plans; Sht R6.5 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Reduce planter strip to 3.5ft to allow 12in gravel spreader adjacent to dispersion trench.
[Plans; Sht R6.5 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout surface width of CAVFS surface.
[Plans; Sht R6.5 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-Dedication width....(12+11+11+0.5+4+8+2+2.5+2-30 = 23').
[Plans; Sht R6.5 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-See dedication comment on 2/R6.5 above.
[Plans; Sht R6.5 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout cross-slope.
[Plans; Sht R6.5 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout cross-slope.
[Plans; Sht R6.5 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout and show 1ft wide gravel spreader per comments on Sheet R4.1.
[Plans; Sht R6.5 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout and show 1ft wide gravel spreader per comments on Sheet R4.1.
[Plans; Sht R6.5 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout top of grade board elevation.
[Plans; Sht R6.5 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Confirm-intent is to have non-symmetrical x-section (6 1/2 vs 6 3/4)?
[Plans; Sht R6.8 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Min. 4" base course required for work in the ROW.
[Plans; Sht R6.8 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add-Subgrade shall be prepared in accordance with APWA GSP 2-06.3(3).
[Plans; Sht R6.8 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide detail for PHMA and PATB associated with the Shared Use Path. Cross-section shall be in accordance with the materials and thicknesses indicated for the existing Shaw Road Shared Use path and the following criteria:
-Subgrade shall be prepared in accordance with APWA GSP 2-06.3(3).
-Permeable Ballast per APWA GSP 4-04.2 (9-03.9(2)) Option 1.
-Permeable ATB per APWA GSP 4SA2.
-Permeable HMA per APWA GSP 5-04.2 (9-03.8) and APW GSP 5-04.3(7)A.
[Plans; Sht R6.8 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add the following:
POROUS PAVEMENT SUBGRADE PREPARATION NOTES
1. Remove existing organic or paving materials from the surface to be prepared.
2. Prepare the subgrade in accordance with the geotechnical engineer’s requirements and the following:
3. Excavation to final subgrade shall occur immediately prior to placing permeable materials. If necessary, the contractor may excavate to an intermediate subgrade elevation established at 12-inches above the final subgrade to assist with field operations.
4. Grading to final subgrade elevation shall be completed by machinery operation on the intermediate subgrade level or outside of the porous fill/pavement prism.
5. The contractor shall phase the work so as not to compromise or overly compact the subgrade. Should it be necessary for machinery or trucks to access the final subgrade in a certain area, the contractor shall protect the subgrade from over-compaction by placing steel sheets, or using another methodology approved by the geotechnical engineer and City.
6. Areas determined to be overly compacted in the opinion of the Engineer, Geotechnical Engineer, or City, shall be scarified by the contractor to a depth agreed upon by the Engineer, Geotechnical Engineer, and City.
7. Loose or disturbed areas identified during excavation to grade shall be over-excavated to firm bearing and replaced with APWA/WSDOT GSP permeable ballast.
8. Approved porous fill materials shall be back-dumped onto the subgrade from the edge of the installation and pushed out onto the subgrade.
9. Trucks shall then back-dump subsequent loads on top of the previously dumped/pushed material as the installation progresses.
10. Final compaction shall be verified by the Geotechnical Engineer.
[Plans; Sht R6.8 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add-Non-woven.
[Plans; Sht R6.8 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add-APWA GSP 4-04.2 (9-03.9(2)) Option 1.
[Plans; Sht R6.8 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add- per APWA GSP 5-06.SA.
[Plans; Sht R6.8 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout-illumination run.
[Plans; Sht SL.02 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Depth of bury for pole foundation shall be measured from bottom of retaining wall to bottom of foundation unless separate structural design provided.
[Plans; Sht SL.02 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Depth of bury for pole foundation shall be measured from bottom of retaining wall to bottom of foundation unless separate structural design provided.
[Plans; Sht SL.02 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add-"and j-box in concrete".
[Plans; Sht RSL.02 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-arm length per Traffic Engineer.
[Plans; Sht RSL.02 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add Note: "Depth of bury for pole foundation shall be measured from bottom of retaining wall to bottom of foundation unless separate structural design provided.
[Plans; Sht SL.03 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Revise ROW dedication as shown.
[Plans; Sht PM-01 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Readability.
[Plans; Sht PM-02 of 44]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Revise per comment on Page 5 of 5.
[Draft Dedication; Pg 1 of 5]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Continue ROW dedication as indicated. Grant easement per comment on Sheet R2.2.
[Draft Dedication; Pg 5 of 5]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-the legal description appears to indicate 18.8' vs 16.6' noted on plans.
[Draft Dedication; Pg 5 of 5]
|
|
Public Works Collection Review
|
Approved
|
01/17/2025
|
01/10/2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Remove existing 8 inch pipe (E) when new SWF is installed. No site stormwater should be discharging at this point. [civil plans, R1.1]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Buried stormwater CB type I. [Civil Plans, R4.0]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
No maintenance access to connection with existing culvert. [Civil Plans, R4.0]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Stormwater pipe diameter in RoW is 12 inches minimum and should have a trash rack or other applicable device at outlet. [Civil Plans, R4.0]
|
|
Planning Review
|
Failed
|
01/17/2025
|
01/09/2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Planning Correction
SEPA: Provide plans to meet SEPA conditions regarding safe routes to schools. SEPA mitigation measures require implementation of a requirement for off-site safe routes to schools improvements. See P-21-0034 SEPA (June 27, 2023). Please provide those plans for further review and agency consultation. 01/09/25 UPDATED NOTES: Its unclear if the applicant has addressed this comment in the current plans to the satisfaction of the city Traffic Engineer. Please provide a detailed, written response upon resubmittal. The resubmittal response document addressed mark ups only.
|
|
Public Works Water Review
|
Approved
|
01/17/2025
|
01/08/2025
|
|
|
|
|
Fire Review
|
Approved
|
01/17/2025
|
12/30/2024
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Civil Review
|
Failed
|
06/20/2024
|
07/09/2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Document Markup
There's also a much larger tributary basin east of the project site which also contributes flows to the roadside channel along Pioneer.
[Storm Report; Pg 7 of 207]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Please add "currently being" here.
[Storm Report; Pg 7 of 207]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
"passes through multiple culverts along the property frontage before being split into two separate piped systems which ultimately discharge to the roadside channel on the north side of Pioneer. The first piped system consists of two pipes adjacent to each other, 12in and 18in ductilie iron, which crosses Pioneer just east of the intersection. The CB's connected to these pipes are located within the travel lane with the CB connected to the 18in pipe currently buried under pavement. The other CB is visible with a solid lid. The second pipe system crosses Shaw Road westerly before turning northwest in a buried structure and discharging to the Pioneer north channel on the west side of Shaw Road."
[Storm Report; Pg 7 of 207]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
"Deer Creek and"
[Storm Report; Pg 7 of 207]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
"the southside of "
[Storm Report; Pg 7 of 207]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
The road runoff along Pioneer discharges to a fish bearing stream so Enhanced Treatement is required. Revise the Pioneer water quality features (media filter and bioswale) accordingly.
[Storm Report; Pg 7 of 207]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Enhanced treatment required. Revise accordingly.
[Storm Report; Pg 7 of 207]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
See comments under Section 2.2 and revise accordingly.
[Storm Report; Pg 8 of 207]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Please add "existing wetpond constructed during the Shaw Road CIP".
[Storm Report; Pg 8 of 207]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Enhanced Treatment required.
[Storm Report; Pg 9 of 207]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Use O&M BMPs from the City's 'Site Management Plan for Stormwater Operations and Maintenance, Appendix A'.
[Storm Report; Pg 9 of 207]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
O&M within the ROW is the responsibility of the City.
[Storm Report; Pg 9 of 207]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-it appears that portions of the frontage improvements, WQ swale, and stream are located in the regulated floodplain per the LOMR dated September 8, 2022. Once confirmed, provide compensatory storage calculations to confirm that the floodplain storage has not been reduced and certify that the work within the floodplain complies with PMC 21.07.
[Storm Report; Pg 10 of 207]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add WDFW HPA.
[Storm Report; Pg 10 of 207]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Enhanced Treatment required.
[Storm Report; Pg 15 of 207]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Use O&M BMPs from the City's 'Site Management Plan for Stormwater Operations and Maintenance, Appendix A'.
[Storm Report; Pg 179 of 207]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Per City Stds 204.5 provide supporting calculation(s) for the sizing of the culvert to convey the 100-yr storm event for the associated tributary basin.
[Storm Report; Pg 193 of 207]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Due to the configuration of the Contech Stormfilter CB, the location of the outlet places the CB perpendicular to the curbline and into the travel lane. City Standards 204.8(11) does not allow solid square lids in the travel lane. Either replace the proprietary square lid with round lids or provide an alternative device (see Old Castle Perk Filter as an example).
[Storm Report; Pg 194 of 207]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
If the proposed biofiltration swale is to be used as part of Enhanced Treatment, then provide a 'stability check' per Ecology reqts.
[Storm Report; Pg 206 of 207]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
The road runoff along Pioneer discharges to a fish bearing stream so Enhanced Treatement is required. Revise the Pioneer water quality features (media filter and bioswale) accordingly.
[Storm Report; Pg 206 of 207]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide DRAFT ROW dedication deed along Pioneer Way frontage, including sketch, on City Form. 34ft road width from centerline, 10ft planter, and 8ft sidewalk. Once approved, record with the Pierce County Auditor.
[Plans; Sht R0.0 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Please remove Notes 2 and 5 (not relevant to this permit application).
[Plans; Sht R0.0 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Revise floodplain delineation based on approved LOMR.
[Plans; Sht R0.0 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Revise per comments on Sht R6.3.
[Plans; Sht 1 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add the following notes to the planset:?????????? ?????? ????????? ???? ??? ?? ???????? ???? ???????? ???????? ???????????? ????? ?? ????????? ?? ????????? ?? ???? ??? ?????????? ????? ?????? ??? ??????? ?????????????
•Existing private utilities (power, gas, telcom, cable, etc…) that are in conflict with City maintained right-of-way and utilities shall be relocated outside of the travelled road section, i.e., behind the curb under the sidewalk area or other location as approved by the City. ??????? ??? ?? ?? ???
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add the following notes to the planset:?????????? ?????? ????????? ???? ??? ?? ???????? ???? ???????? ???????? ???????????? ????? ?? ????????? ?? ????????? ?? ???? ??? ?????????? ????? ?????? ??? ??????? ?????????????
•Existing private utilities (power, gas, telcom, cable, etc…) that are in conflict with City maintained right-of-way and utilities shall be relocated outside of the travelled road section, i.e., behind the curb under the sidewalk area or other location as approved by the City. ??????? ??? ?? ?? ???
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Clarify what is happening with existing sidewalk, ramps, and utilities.
[Plans; Sht R1.1 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide Type III Barricade per CS 01.02.20.
[Plans; Sht R2.0 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Revise-see shared use path x-section.
[Plans; Sht R2.0 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add-"Permit PRCCP20230970".
[Plans; Sht R2.0 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify leader location.
[Plans; Sht R2.0 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide spot elevations at corners of ramps and landing and at the corners where the DWS meets the flowline.
[Plans; Sht R2.0 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide the following information for the approach:
-Centerline stationing
-curb radii, curve length, and delta angle
-flowline elevations at PC, PT, and 1/4-points of radius
-Drive aisle width at throat
[Plans; Sht R2.0 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide valley gutter flowline elevations at each end and 50ft oc.
[Plans; Sht R2.0 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide easement right or dedicate ROW to the City for ADA ramp and signal
[Plans; Sht R2.0 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide spot elevations at corners of the ramp and landing and at the corners where the DWS meets the flowline.
[Plans; Sht R2.0 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Show shared use path transition to ADA ramp. Provide non-hardscape area adjacent to ramp pedestrian curbs.
[Plans; Sht R2.0 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Transition shared use path to ADA ramp.
[Plans; Sht R2.0 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add note that shared use path to be pervious pavement per details/ on Sheets R6.3 and R6.5, but ADA ramps to be convential concrete pavement.
[Plans; Sht R2.0 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Show steet light locations along frontage.
[Plans; Sht R2.0 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout min. 3ft clear btwn face of pole and face of curb. Relocate if necessary.
[Plans; Sht R2.0 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
See comment on 4/R6.2.
[Plans; Sht R2.1 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide spot elevations at corners of ramps and landing and at the corners where the DWS meets the flowline.
[Plans; Sht R2.1 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide the following information for the approach:
-Centerline stationing
-curb radii, curve length, and delta angle
-flowline elevations at PC, PT, and 1/4-points of radius
-Drive aisle width at throat
[Plans; Sht R2.1 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide easement right or dedicate ROW to the City for ADA ramp located outside ROW.
[Plans; Sht R2.1 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add-"Permit PRCCP20230970".
[Plans; Sht R2.1 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Revise-see shared use path x-section.
[Plans; Sht R2.1 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Show shared use path transition to ADA ramp. Provide non-hardscape area adjacent to ramp pedestrian curbs.
[Plans; Sht R2.1 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout to transition shared use path to 8ft sidewalk. Ensure that any areas of the shared use path that butt to the high side of a pedestrian curb are not hardscape (hardscape creates potential tripping hazards.)
[Plans; Sht R2.1 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Existing ADA ramps are non-compliant (cross-slopes, ramp lengths, etc.) and must be replaced. Adjust/relocate existing utilities which are in conflict with revised curb ramp designs. Provide detail(s) of proposed ramps with spot elevations at the corners of ramps, landings, and at the corners where the DWS meets the flowline.
[Plans; Sht R2.1 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout proposed ROW radius.
[Plans; Sht R2.1 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout contour elevations adjacent to the corner.
[Plans; Sht R2.1 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Relocate proposed pedestrian curb to back of walk.
[Plans; Sht R2.1 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Remove and replace existing non-standard sidewalk.
[Plans; Sht R2.1 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Transition shared use path to ADA ramp.
[Plans; Sht R2.1 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add note that shared use path to be pervious pavement per details/ on Sheets R6.3 and R6.5, but ADA ramps to be convential concrete pavement.
[Plans; Sht R2.1 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Show steet light locations along frontage.
[Plans; Sht R2.1 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Relocate existing steet light to provide min. 24" clear from face of curb.
[Plans; Sht R2.1 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Clarify-Keynote 4 is also being used for existing light standard and j-boxes at the intersection.
[Plans; Sht R3.0 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add the following notes to the planset:?????????? ?????? ????????? ???? ??? ?? ???????? ???? ???????? ???????? ???????????? ????? ?? ????????? ?? ????????? ?? ???? ??? ?????????? ????? ?????? ??? ??????? ?????????????
•Existing private utilities (power, gas, telcom, cable, etc…) that are in conflict with City maintained right-of-way and utilities shall be relocated outside of the travelled road section, i.e., behind the curb under the sidewalk area or other location as approved by the City. ??????? ??? ??? ?? ???
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout watermain to be removed per Civil Permit PRCCP20230970.
[Plans; Sht R3.0 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Jboxes to be relocated due to ADA ramp replacements.
[Plans; Sht R3.0 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add the following notes to the planset:?????????? ?????? ????????? ???? ??? ?? ???????? ???? ???????? ???????? ???????????? ????? ?? ????????? ?? ????????? ?? ???? ??? ?????????? ????? ?????? ??? ??????? ?????????????
•Existing private utilities (power, gas, telcom, cable, etc…) that are in conflict with City maintained right-of-way and utilities shall be relocated outside of the travelled road section, i.e., behind the curb under the sidewalk area or other location as approved by the City. ??????? ??? ??? ?? ???
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify "Note 4" reference.
[Plans; Sht R3.1 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Indicate and callout regulated floodplain. Provide compensatory storage calculations to confirm that the floodplain storage has not been reduced and certify that the work within the floodplain complies with PMC 21.07.
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
The proposed biofiltration swale only provides Basic Treatment. Enhanced Treatment is required due to discharge to the regulated stream. Revise WQ design accordingly.
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
City Standards require a storm main at curbline. Any deviation from the standard will require review and approval of the City Engineer via the AMR process.
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Identify elevation callouts.
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Wall to be located outside of ROW on private property.
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout contour elevations.
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
See comment Sheet R6.2.
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Revise culvert length per HPA permit.
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Revise culvert length per HPA permit.
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout rip-rap pad dimensions and thickness-if part of final design.
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Show existing buried CB adjacent to CB D4-10697.
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
See comment Sheet R6.2.
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Revise for Enhanced Treatment.
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
In an effort to remove the culvert outside of the road section as well as tie-in a new storm main serving Pioneer Way and a future extension beyond the project limits; place a new CB at the existing culvert end with a storm main eastward and stub a new pipe out the back for the connection to the culvert.
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Show maintenance access per comments on 2/R6.2.
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide debris screen at culvert entrance. Bars to be spaced approximately 12in oc.
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Revise per final design.
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout TW/BW elevations.
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
See City Stds 204.3 for storm pipe sizing criteria.
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
See City Stds 204.8 for maximum gutter run.
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide flowline elevations at 50ft oc.
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout proposed ROW radius.
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Sawcut existing pavement to nearest proposed northerly lane line. Provide full depth road section per City Standard Detail 01.01.19 with cross-slope noted on plan at 100ft intervals (max). Maintain x-slope btwn 2% and 5%.
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Buried stormwater structure-raise to grade and provide ring and cover.
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Grind and overlay existing lane beyond sawcut to match new full-depth road section.
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Show steet light locations along frontage.
[Plans; Sht R4.0 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide CB with stub to the east for future connection. Plug stub end.
[Plans; Sht R4.1 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide the following information for the approach:
-Centerline stationing
-curb radii, curve length, and delta angle
-flowline elevations at PC, PT, and 1/4-points of radius
-Drive aisle width at throat
[Plans; Sht R4.1 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Walls are not allowed within the ROW without an approved AMR. If the walls cannot be eliminated, submit an AMR for City Engineer review and approval.
[Plans; Sht R4.1 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide callout. Ensure relocated pole is within future planter strip.
[Plans; Sht R4.1 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide detail of ADA ramp with spot elevations at corners of the ramp and landing and at the corners where the DWS meets the flowline.
[Plans; Sht R4.1 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
See City Stds 204.8 for maximum gutter run.
[Plans; Sht R4.1 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide valley gutter flowline elevations at each end and 50ft oc.
[Plans; Sht R4.1 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
See comments Sht R4.0.
[Plans; Sht R4.1 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Identify elevation callouts.
[Plans; Sht R4.1 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide flowline elevations at 50ft oc.
[Plans; Sht R4.1 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout and show existing EP btwn 51+00 and 53+00.
[Plans; Sht R4.1 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Is this a new headwall? Clarify work to be done to tie proposed stream to existing culvert end.
[Plans; Sht R4.1 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Sawcut existing pavement to nearest proposed lane line. Provide full depth road section per City Standard Detail 01.01.19 with cross-slope noted on plan at 100ft intervals (max). Maintain x-slope btwn 2% and 5%.
[Plans; Sht R4.1 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
End full-depth road section.
[Plans; Sht R4.1 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout contour elevations.
[Plans; Sht R4.1 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Grind and overlay existing lane beyond sawcut to match new full-depth road section.
[Plans; Sht R4.1 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide ADA ramp for future tie-in of sidewalk. Provide detail of ADA ramp with spot elevations at corners of the ramp and landing and at the corners where the DWS meets the flowline.
[Plans; Sht R4.1 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Show steet light locations along frontage.
[Plans; Sht R4.1 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide stiping info for the approach.
[Plans; Sht R5.0 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Prior to Occupancy, execute and record “Private Road Maintenance Agreement” (for maintenance of private striping within the ROW) on form approved by the City Attorney. ??????? ??? ??? ?? ??
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Remove reference to Pierce County standard.
[Plans; Sht R6.1 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Notes 13 and 14 aren't applicable to this project.
[Plans; Sht R6.1 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Examples of curb ramp designs with spot elevations...reference comments on frontage plans.
[Plans; Sht R6.1 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout the following information for the WQ swale:
-grass seed mix criteria
-thickness of amended soil
-amended soil composition criteria
-filter fabric wrap reqts.
-drain rock thickness above/below underdrain
-indicate groundwater elev (El. 69.84) in relation to the x-section
-indicate synthetic impermeable liner and provide criteria
[Plans; Sht R6.2 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Confirm 5/8" minus per Ecology.
[Plans; Sht R6.2 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout grass on the side slopes.
[Plans; Sht R6.2 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Curb cut cannot be allowed on Pioneer due to traffic volume and speed. In the past, the City has approved for use the Neenah Foundry Curb Box R-3165. If this through-curb inlet works for the proposed design it can be incorporated into the planset. Other alternatives would likely require discussion and approval using the Alternative Methods Request (AMR) process.
[Plans; Sht R6.2 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Enhanced Treatment required for Pioneer. The comments below are provided in case the biofiltration swale will still be utilized as part of a treatment train.
[Plans; Sht R6.2 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Due to the configuration of the Contech Stormfilter CB, the location of the outlet places the CB perpendicular to the curbline and into the travel lane. City Standards 204.8(11) does not allow solid square lids in the travel lane. Either replace the proprietary square lid with round lids or provide an alternative device (see Old Castle Perk Filter as an example).
[Plans; Sht R6.2 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add-HPA culvert cross-sections to the planset.
[PH2 CFG Plans; Sht C1.00]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide CIP or prefab end wall. If CIP call out reinforcting req'ts. (See example above as one possible alternative).
[Plans; Sht R6.2 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide maintenance access above pipe-culvert tie-in. (See example above as on possible alternative).
[Plans; Sht R6.2 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify-HPA culvert details indicate 2ft tall interior height.
[Plans; Sht R6.2 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout and show 12in min. shoulder per Standards.
[Plans; Sht R6.3 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Locate ROW at back of walk per standards.
[Plans; Sht R6.3 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Revise to reflect Shared Use Path design...see right.
[Plans; Sht R6.3 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Revise-Existing ROW varies from 65' to 90' btwn 9+20 to 11+76, and varies from 93' to 99' btwn 13+26 to 15+90.
[Plans; Sht R6.3 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add- "17ft".
[Plans; Sht R6.3 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Revise-Existing ROW varies from 90' to 93' btwn 11+76 to 13+26.
[Plans; Sht R6.3 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Revise-Existing dim'n is 30' 11+76 to 13+20; 33' 13+20 to 13+26.
[Plans; Sht R6.3 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add- "17ft".
[Plans; Sht R6.3 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
3ft per CS 01.02.19.
[Plans; Sht R6.3 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
ROW varies btwn Sta 45+00 and Sta 48+75. See AFN 9408230215 and revise accordingly.
[Plans; Sht R6.3 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide 34ft curb to CL.
[Plans; Sht R6.3]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Determine proposed ROW dedication using 34ft btwn curb and centerline and callout dimension on the x-section.
[Plans; Sht R6.3 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide 34ft curb to CL.
[Plans; Sht R6.3]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
See comments on Detail 1 above.
[Plans; Sht R6.3 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Revise lane dimensioning for 34ft cross-section.
[Plans; Sht R6.3 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Revise lane dimensioning for 34ft cross-section.
[Plans; Sht R6.3 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add "pervious".
[Plans; Sht R6.3 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add City Std Details:
01.01.05 // 01.01.11 // 01.01.18 // 01.02.02 (strike Note 7 due to pervious concrete) // 01.02.03 // 01.02.08a // 01.02.16 // 01.02.19 // 01.02.20 // 01.03.06 // 01.03.13 // 01.03.14 // 01.03.15 // 01.04.01 // 01.04.02
|
|
|
See Document Markup
3ft per CS 01.02.19.
[Plans; Sht R6.5 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Revise per Shared Use Path comments (Sht R6.3) and Planning Dept comments.
[Plans; Sht R7.0 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Callout plantings per Planning Dept criteria. Callout root barriers for any trees planted within the ROW.
[Plans; Sht R7.0 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add the following to Note 6:????? ? ???? ?? ??? ???? ???????????? ????? ?? ???????? ?? ??? ?????? ?????? ?????????? ????? ?? ??????????????
-“6b. Contractor shall contact the City’s signal technician when the lights are ready to be energized.”??????? ??? ??? ?? ??
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify Sch. 80 PVC conduit at approach. Replace if necessary.
[Plans; Sht SL.1 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
If underground conduit at new approach, confirm Sch. 80 PVC conduit or replace if necessary.
[Plans; Sht SL.1 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
At proposed City light standard locations, encapsulate the light base into the sidewalk and/or shared use path pour.
[Plans; Sht SL.1 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Grind and Overlay one lane width.
[Plans; Sht R2.1 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
See comments on Sht R6.2.
[Plans; Sht R6.3 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Full depth road section per City Standard 01.01.05.
[Plans; Sht R6.3 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Full depth road section per City Standard 01.01.05.
[Plans; Sht R6.3 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Coordinate paving section with comments on Sht R4.0 and R4.1.
[Plans; Sht R6.3 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Coordinate paving section with comments on Sht R4.0 and R4.1.
[Plans; Sht R6.3 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Indicate and callout regulated floodplain. Provide compensatory storage calculations to confirm that the floodplain storage has not been reduced and certify that the work within the floodplain complies with PMC 21.07.
[Plans; Sht R4.1 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Maintain curb and gutter alignment along Pioneer to east property line.
[Plans; Sht R4.1 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add the following notes to the planset:
-Existing public utilities that are in conflict with proposed frontage improvements shall be relocated as necessary to meet all applicable City, State, and Federal requirements.
-Existing private utilities (power, gas, telcom, cable, etc...) that are in conflict with City maintained right-of way and utilities shall be relocated outside of the travelled road section, i.e., behind the curb under the sidewalk area or other location as approved by the City.
[Plans; Sht R1.0 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add the following notes to the planset:
-Existing public utilities that are in conflict with proposed frontage improvements shall be relocated as necessary to meet all applicable City, State, and Federal requirements.
-Existing private utilities (power, gas, telcom, cable, etc...) that are in conflict with City maintained right-of way and utilities shall be relocated outside of the travelled road section, i.e., behind the curb under the sidewalk area or other location as approved by the City.
[Plans; Sht R1.1 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add the following notes to the planset:
-Existing public utilities that are in conflict with proposed frontage improvements shall be relocated as necessary to meet all applicable City, State, and Federal requirements.
-Existing private utilities (power, gas, telcom, cable, etc...) that are in conflict with City maintained right-of way and utilities shall be relocated outside of the travelled road section, i.e., behind the curb under the sidewalk area or other location as approved by the City.
[Plans; Sht R3.0 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add the following notes to the planset:
-Existing public utilities that are in conflict with proposed frontage improvements shall be relocated as necessary to meet all applicable City, State, and Federal requirements.
-Existing private utilities (power, gas, telcom, cable, etc...) that are in conflict with City maintained right-of way and utilities shall be relocated outside of the travelled road section, i.e., behind the curb under the sidewalk area or other location as approved by the City.
[Plans; Sht R3.1 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Prior to Occupancy, execute and record "Private Road Maintenance Agreement" (for maintenance of private striping within the ROW) on form approved by the City Attorney.
[Plans; Sht R5.0 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add the following to Note 6:
-"6a. A copy of the load calculations shall be provided to the City's signal technician prior to installation.
-"6b. Contractor shall contact the City's signal technician when the lights are ready to be energized."
[Plans; Sht SL.1 of 21]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add City Std Details:
02.01.05 // 06.01.01 // 06.01.02
[Plans; Sht R6.2 of 21]
|
|
Engineering Traffic Review
|
Failed
|
06/20/2024
|
07/03/2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Remove thermoplastic STOP bar from gutter pan.
PM-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Jason Rogge
253-841-5471
PM-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Adjust east/west lane striping to accommodate left turn pocket and shared thru/right turn lane. Shift driveway as needed to align NB/SB left turn pockets.
PM-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Remove right turn arrow
Intersection must be channelized with left turn pocket & shared thru/right pocket.
PM-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Remove right turn arrow
Intersection must be channelized with left turn pocket & shared thru/right pocket.
PM-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Signal plans need to be included in civil plan set.
PM-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Replace with City standard left turn arrow w/ ONLY thermoplastic.
PM-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Replace with City standard left turn arrow w/ ONLY thermoplastic.
PM-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Shift driveway as needed to align NB/SB left turn pockets.
PM-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
remain and point to southern leg of this intersection.
PM-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Should Remain
PM-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Bike Lane sign? W16-9P?
PM-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
W16-9P?
PM-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Why remove this sign?
PM-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Should remain
PM-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
RSSZ flasher
-Coordinate with the City for required hardware & wireless interconnect
-Show condiut/j-box/power source/etc.
-How did the design team determine placement? 300ft from school property would place beacon within signalized intersection.
-Reference applicable WAC with placement/design justification.
-MUTCD compliant advanced signage/pavement markings missing from design
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
RSSZ flasher
-Coordinate with the City for required hardware & wireless interconnect
-Show condiut/j-box/power source/etc.
-Reference applicable WAC with placement/design justification.
-MUTCD compliant advanced signage/pavement markings missing from design
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
As condition with the preliminary site plan approval, the required signal/intersection modifications must be fully configured and operational no less than 2 weeks prior to receiving occupancy for any building on-site. Adaptive signal contractor (Rhythm Engineering) will be required to configure the adaptive system on-site. Adaptive contractor will provide setup/configuration/optimization (not completed by the City). Place this condition on the plans.
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Per the approved preliminary site plan conditions, provide details on overhead fiber connection and how it will be spliced/connected to cabinet.
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Electronic blank out sign not necessary here. During a the phase 4 ped movement, WBL drivers will not be allowed to make a permissive left turn across the crosswalk. Update phasing/coding accordingly. Electronic blank out sign necessary for SB approach (southbound right turning vehicles) Incorporate into design.
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
As condition with the preliminary site plan approval, Flashing yellow arrows with PT/PM phasing required required for EB/WB left turns. Modify phasing as needed
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Adjust east/west lane striping to accommodate left turn pocket and shared thru/right turn lane. To accommodate this phasing, the EBR overlap must be removed
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Adjust east/west lane striping to accommodate left turn pocket and shared thru/right turn lane. Shift driveway as needed to align NB/SB left turn pockets.
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
To accommodate required channelization (left turn pocket and shared thru/right turn lane), EBR overlap must be removed
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
FYA signal head
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
FYA signal head
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Does not appear to be ADA compliant (greater than 10ft from curb)
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
this should be installed on both sides of Shaw Rd (north leg) as there is no crosswalk on north side. Use the appropriate R9-3B signs to direct pedestrians to the south leg crosswalk.
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Remove
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Coordinate with the City on the size/type/model number of electronic blank out sign.
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
J-box over capacity
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Missing EVPE for this leg.
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Swapped?
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Move j-boxes outside of sidewalk
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
R9-3 combo should be installed on both sides of Shaw Rd (north leg)
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Why is there 2-2" here and only 1-2" in Wire note #10?
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Missing wire note for required fiber connection to signal cabinet.
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Missing wire note
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
It appears this equipment is not located within ROW
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Update phasing digram to reflect PT/PM FYA operation for EB/WB.
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
WBL permissive not allowed during phase 4 ped movement. Show this configuration.
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Overhead communication lines will block signal head visibility. Contractor is responsible to raise utility lines as needed. Place note on plans.
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Coordinate with the City of Puyallup for the required Campbell APS unit
TS-01
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Type PS pole receiving Type PS pole?
|
|
|
See Document Markup
No spares?
|
|
|
See Document Markup
existing
|
|
|
See Document Markup
missing from plan
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Evpe B and D?
|
|
|
See Document Markup
A?
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Swapped?
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify new signage is included for new wind area loading
TS-04
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Update based PT/PM FYA phasing, FYA signage, etc.
TS-04
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Update based PT/PM FYA phasing, FYA signage, overlap removal, electronic blank-out sign, etc.
TS-04
|
|
|
See Document Markup
ADA ramp design and location does not match signal design.
Civil Plans - R2.0
|
|
|
See Document Markup
For WBR movement, provide ESD sight lines to ensure right on-red movements have adequate sight distance
Civil Plans - R2.0
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Shared use path design not consistent with provided in signal design or previously constructed sections on Shaw Rd.
Civil Plans - R2.0
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Utility pole must be relocated farther from intersection. Must be minimum 3ft between face of curb and face of pole
Civil Plans - R2.0
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Updated pavement markings for EB approach missing
Civil Plans - R2.0
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Show locations of City standard streetlights on frontage
Civil Plans - R2.0
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide detailed cost estimate for the Shaw Rd frontage improvements only. Applicant will receive a traffic impact fee credit for the cost to construct frontage on Shaw Rd.
Civil Plans - R2.1
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Remove junction boxes from sidewalk. Replace existing ADA ramps at signal (does not meet City standards)
Civil Plans - R2.1
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Show locations of City standard streetlights on frontage
Civil Plans - R2.0
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Future location must not interfere with future frontage improvements. PSE mounted streetlight to be removed. Lighting to be replaced by City standard lighting.
Civil Plans - R3.1
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Fix abrupt vertical curb alignment
Civil Plans - R4.0
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Per the approved preliminary site plan conditions, the City will require more information regarding the E Pioneer curb alignment. Show additional curb alignment on the west side of Shaw/Pioneer signal (Pioneer Crossing frontage).
Civil Plans - R4.0
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Proposed ROW dedication too large. Only dedicate to back of sidewalk
Civil Plans - R4.0
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Proposed voids in vertical curb is not allowed. Must propose a design alternative that provides a continuous vertical curb along arterial segment.
Civil Plans - R4.0
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify face of curb alignment matches Pioneer Crossing development.
Civil Plans - R4.0
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Show locations of City standard streetlights on frontage
Civil Plans - R4.0
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Extend curb gutter and roadway widening to edge of ROW ~ STA 51+25. Curb identified in red
Civil Plans - R4.1
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Per the approved preliminary site plan conditions, at the discretion of the City, the City may restrict outbound left turns from the E Pioneer access in the future. At the request of the City, the Owners, Heirs, Successors and Assigns agree to renovate and/or improve the driveway access in accordance with the City of Puyallup Municipal Code and Engineering Standards.” Place this note on these plans
Civil Plans - R4.1
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Per the approved preliminary site plan conditions, during civil design a detailed sight distance analysis will be required at the E Pioneer driveway per City Standards. ESD of 415ft is required at this driveway. Assume 14.5ft setback from the E Pioneer curb alignment and 3.5ft driver eye height.
Civil Plans - R4.1
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Type 3 object marker (OM-3R) per COP 01.03.13
Civil Plans - R4.1
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Start fog line straight taper
STA 50+43.85, 23.00ft RT
Civil Plans - R4.1
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Taper markings per COP 01.03.13
Civil Plans - R4.1
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Start Double yellow CL
STA 50+43.85, 12.00ft RT
Civil Plans - R4.1
|
|
|
See Document Markup
provide 3ft paved shoulder behind fog line
Civil Plans - R4.1
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Show EB right turn pocket.
Civil Plans - R4.1
|
|
|
See Document Markup
connect fog line into existing
Civil Plans - R4.1
|
|
|
See Document Markup
relocate utility pole outside of future sidewalk alignment
Civil Plans - R4.1
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide ADA compliant wheelchair ramp. Not required to extend sidewalk east of the driveway.
Civil Plans - R4.1
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Remove walls from ROW. Locations will conflict from future sidewalk/planter strip alignment. Place ESD sight lines on plans to ensure there's no conflict
Civil Plans - R4.1
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Remove walls from ROW. Will interfere with future sidewalk/planter strip alignment
Civil Plans - R4.1
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide fog line radius to guide vehicles to tapered vehicle path.
Civil Plans - R4.1
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Show locations of City standard streetlights on frontage
Civil Plans - R4.1
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Per the approved preliminary site plan conditions, striping/pavement marking modifications required at Shaw/Pioneer signal. With proposed improvements, EB approach will allow two lanes thru.
Civil Plans - R5.0
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Remove curvature
Civil Plans - R5.0
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Turn pocket markings do not meet City standards. New thermoplastic pavement markings required
Civil Plan - R5.0
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Two EB lane striping not provided
Civil Plans - R5.0
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Per approved preliminary site plan conditions, civil plan set shall provide a detailed channelization plan for all striping & pavement markings in within ROW. All proposed striping shall meet City and MUTCD requirements. Plan shall include signage located in ROW. All City standard details related to pavement markings, striping, sign placement must be provided.
Civil Plans - R5.0
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide right turn pocket striping + arrows -
Civil Plans - R5.0
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide MUTCD compliant "RIGHT LANE MUST TURN RIGHT" signage
Civil Plans - R5.0
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide short interval white skip stripe in advance of solid white gore for right turn pocket
Civil Plans - R5.0
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Channelization?
Civil Plans - R5.0
|
|
|
See Document Markup
details for existing pavement marking removal should be on this sheet
Civil Plans - R5.0
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Verify lane striping alignment with existing striping on the west side of signal.
Civil Plans - R5.0
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Define ROW dedication offset
Civil Plans - R6.3
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Shared use path design does not match previously constructed sections on Shaw Rd.
Civil Plans - R6.3
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Why is there additional dedication behind sidewalk?
Civil Plans - R6.3
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Update all exhibits with scaled drawings
Civil Plans - R6.3
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Update all exhibits with face of curb offset from roadway CL. Should be 34ft from CL along entire E Pioneer frontage.
Civil Plans - R6.3
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Curb alignment/offset shall be constant along E Pioneer (34ft from CL). No physical taper
Civil Plans - R6.3
|
|
|
See Document Markup
City standard streetlights are required every 150ft (minimum).
Project to provide GE EVOLVE ELR2 Fixtures ERL2-3-23-A3-40-D-Gray-A-V1 (City to provide latest part numbers)
How will lights be powered? New service cabinet? Using the existing signal service cabinet?
Streetlights shall have shorting caps installed with remote photocell located on the service cabinet.
Civil Plans - SL.1
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Existing fixtures to be upgraded to current standard
Civil Plans - SL.1
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Clearly identify as being removed. Existing PSE utility pole mounted streetlights do not meet current City standards and will be removed with installation of City standard streetlights.
Civil Plans - SL.1
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Clearly identify as being removed. Existing PSE utility pole mounted streetlights do not meet current City standards and will be removed with installation of City standard streetlights.
Civil Plans - SL.1
|
|
|
See Document Markup
It is the sole responsibility of the design engineer to ensure streetlight design/placement is outside of the 10ft minimum “safe zone” area. The City will not allow streetlights to be within 10ft of the PSE primary for safety reasons. Place this note on this sheet????? ????? ? ????
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Frontage design not consistent with other sheets in this submittal.
Civil Plans - SL.1
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Streetlight design shall provide the following:
1. Provide details on how streetlights will be powered
2. Location of conduit runs
3. Wiring Schedule
a. Conduit size and type for each raceway
b. Conductors details
4. Pole schedule
a. STA & offset for each luminaire
5. Show location of junction boxes
Civil Plans - SL.1
|
|
|
See Document Markup
This light pole is not existing.
Civil Plans - SL.1
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Photometric analysis needs to account for existing City standard lighting on both sides of the street (including lighting at signalized intersection). Assume utility/PSE mounted streetlights will be removed with project.
Civil Plans - SL.1
|
|
|
See Document Markup
J-box and (2) runs of conduit to extend to southern edge of frontage
Civil Plans - SL.1
|
|
|
See Document Markup
J-box and (2) runs of conduit to extend to southern edge of frontage
Civil Plans - SL.1
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Lighting engineer to verify proposed design will meet or exceed WSDOT light level requirements for pedestrian facilities:
Average(fc): 0.8
Uniformity: 4:1
Civil Plans - SL.1
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Show ESD sight lines at this intersection to ensure there are no obstructions.
Civil Plans - R7.0
|
|
Public Works Collection Review
|
Failed
|
06/20/2024
|
06/24/2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Remove existing 8 inch pipe (E) when new SWF is installed. No site stormwater should be discharging at this point. [civil plans, R1.1]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Buried stormwater CB type I. [Civil Plans, R4.0]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
No maintenance access to connection with existing culvert. [Civil Plans, R4.0]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Stormwater pipe diameter in RoW is 12 inches minimum and should have a trash rack or other applicable device at outlet. [Civil Plans, R4.0]
|
|
Public Works Streets Review
|
Failed
|
06/20/2024
|
06/20/2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Document Markup
this is not a "single ramp" R2.0 sheet 4 SH
|
|
|
See Document Markup
CB in pedestrian pathway/crosswalk R2.0 sheet 4 SH
|
|
|
See Document Markup
HMA restoration single lane grind/overlay R2.0 sheet 4 SH
|
|
|
See Document Markup
this is a streetlight not a power pole R3.0 sheet 6 SH
|
|
|
See Document Markup
streetlight removed & relocated by others, who is others R3.1 sheet 7 SH
|
|
|
See Document Markup
grind/overlay one lane width R4.0 sheet 8 SH
|
|
|
See Document Markup
2" grind/ overlay, end square, not a point R4.1 sheet 9 SH
|
|
|
See Document Markup
2" grind/overlay R6.3 sheet 14 SH
|
|
|
See Document Markup
2" grind/overlay to lane line, end square R6.3 sheet 14 SH
|
|
|
See Document Markup
sight distance concerns, do these impede on meeting sight distance requirements, what type of tree/plantings are these, what root barrier or sidewalk damage protection will be used R7 sheet 17 SH
|
|
|
See Document Markup
show what streetlights are existing and what are new. previous page states remove and relocate streetlight/power pole, which ones will be moved, verify conduit continuity and ability to maintain and pull wire if needed, add extra 2" spare conduit throughout width of project, our standard states schedule 80 conduit under roads/driveway...has this been verified it exist, if not replace with schedule 80 across entrance & , verify and state existing wire size and it meets current standards.... SL.1 SH
|
|
|
See Document Markup
signal tech phone number is 253-341-8439
|
|
|
See Document Markup
is this the same one on sheet 7 that says relocate, if it going to be removed why does the sidewalk curve around it SL-1 SH
|
|
|
See Document Markup
show actual location of new underground conduit, in right-of-way SL.1 SH
|
|
|
See Document Markup
show where J-box location will be, armorcast J-boxes should be used.. SL.1 SH
|
|
|
See Document Markup
|
|
|
See Document Markup
|
|
|
See Document Markup
|
|
|
See Document Markup
|
|
|
See Document Markup
|
|
|
See Document Markup
|
|
|
See Document Markup
|
|
|
See Document Markup
|
|
|
See Document Markup
|
|
|
See Document Markup
|
|
|
See Document Markup
|
|
Fire Review
|
Approved
|
06/20/2024
|
06/06/2024
|
|
|
|
|
Public Works Water Review
|
Approved
|
06/20/2024
|
06/05/2024
|
|
|
|
|
Planning Review
|
Failed
|
06/20/2024
|
04/30/2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Planning Correction
LANDSCAPE: Remove all street trees shown on Shaw Road planting and utility sheets. The strip is too narrow for new street trees.
SEPA: Provide plans to meet SEPA conditions regarding safe routes to schools. SEPA mitigation measures require implementation of a requirement for off-site safe routes to schools improvements. See P-21-0034 SEPA (June 27, 2023). Please provide those plans for further review and agency consultation.
|
