Review Type |
Outcome |
Est. Completion Date |
Completed |
Planning Review
|
VOID
|
02/03/2022
|
07/13/2023
|
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Site is located at the southeast corner. [DA, pg 2]
|
|
See Document Markup
Please remove. [DA, pg 2]
|
|
See Document Markup
Please remove. [DA, pg 2]
|
|
See Document Markup
Although this was identified in Ord 3131, a fuel station is no longer proposed within 300' of intersection. Please remove. [DA, pg 6]
|
|
See Document Markup
Zoning now allows for stand-alone residential structures. Please remove. [DA, pg 6]
|
|
See Document Markup
This is redundant with #3 below, and is not longer applicable due to removal of Overlay. Please remove. [DA, pg 6]
|
|
See Document Markup
Move to recitals or remove entirely. [DA, pg 6]
|
|
See Document Markup
Since deviations from design review are now proposed, this should be removed. [DA, pg 6]
|
|
See Document Markup
Move to recitals or remove entirely. [DA, pg 6]
|
|
See Document Markup
Move to recitals or remove entirely. [DA, pg 6]
|
|
See Document Markup
Residential zone: code requires 25' building setback with 12' landscape area. Commercial zone: SPO requires 25' landscape setback that can be reduced if setback is landscaped and provides a pedestrian-friendly experience. Please revise to correctly reference code and requested deviation; demonstrate that the revised development standard "provides the functional equivalent or adequately achieves the purpose of otherwise applicable city standards" per PMC 1.15. [DA, pg. 7]
|
|
See Document Markup
Please remove extraneous commentary in italics. Staff report will note that the City would shoulder the responsibility of future street improvements. [DA, pg 7]
|
|
See Document Markup
Please remove. [DA, pg. 7]
|
|
See Document Markup
Please remove. [DA, pg. 8]
|
|
See Document Markup
Please remove deleted text. [DA, pg. 9]
|
|
See Document Markup
Please remove deleted text. [DA, pg. 9]
|
|
See Document Markup
Please provide the numerical density increase being requested. If a prior approved development agreement is to be referenced, please provide a copy. [DA, pg.9]
|
|
See Document Markup
Staff recommends processing this request administratively through the site plan application. Please remove. [DA, pg. 9]
|
|
See Document Markup
Please remove deleted text. [DA, pg. 9]
|
|
See Document Markup
Staff recommends meeting 20.26.200 design review standards, per the intent of Ord. 3131 and the request for additional density. If this is kept in as a requested deviation, please properly identify the code section(s) requested for deviation. [DA, pg. 10]
|
|
See Document Markup
Per prior council discussion and financial impacts, staff will not recommend this deviation. [DA, pg. 10]
|
|
|
Public Works Collection Review
|
VOID
|
02/17/2022
|
11/02/2022
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Traffic Review
|
Revisions Required
|
02/03/2022
|
05/10/2022
|
|
|
|
See Document Markup
a 75ft TWLTL is required east of the proposed driveway which will require roadway widening. Additionally, paved offsite tapers (per City Standards) will be required to safely transition eastbound vehicles to the existing roadway alignment. These requirements will require improvements east of the proposed driveway (roadway widening, tapers, striping, signage, etc.) (DA pg 7)
|
|
|
Fire Review
|
No Comments
|
02/03/2022
|
03/02/2022
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Review
|
Revisions Required
|
02/03/2022
|
02/22/2022
|
|
|
|
|
Building Review
|
Revisions Required
|
02/03/2022
|
02/04/2022
|
|
|
|
3. Development Standards. The Projects shall be governed by all applicable City, State
and Federal development standards that are in effect at the time that this Agreement is approved
by the City Council, except to the extent that any development standards identified herein differ
from City development standards. pg 6 of 16
Clarification of this section: This agreement/section does not apply to the effective date of State building code in accordance with RCW 19.27.031.
|
Engineering Review
|
VOID
|
02/17/2022
|
01/25/2022
|
|
|
|
|
Public Works Collection Review
|
VOID
|
02/17/2022
|
01/25/2022
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Review
|
Revisions Required
|
|
12/16/2021
|
|
|
|
Revisions requested per DRT letter 3 and subsequent meetings with Greg Helle. To be reviewed concurrently with P-21-0034.
|
Engineering Traffic Review
|
VOID
|
|
12/16/2021
|
|
|
|
ENG TRAFFIC - No Comments
|
Engineering Review
|
VOID
|
|
12/16/2021
|
|
|
|
- No Comments
|
Engineering Traffic Review
|
Approved
|
|
09/28/2021
|
|
|
|
ENG TRAFFIC - No Comments
|
Engineering Traffic Review
|
Approved
|
|
09/09/2021
|
|
|
|
ENG TRAFFIC - Updated DRT with previous notes.
|
Building Review
|
Approved
|
|
06/18/2021
|
|
|
|
BLDG PLAN REVIEW - No Comments
|
Building Review
|
Approved
|
|
06/01/2021
|
|
|
|
BLDG PLAN REVIEW - Updated DRT with previous notes.
|
Engineering Review
|
Approved
|
|
04/21/2021
|
|
|
|
ENG PLAN REVIEW CIVIL - No Comments
|
Engineering Review
|
Approved
|
|
04/08/2021
|
|
|
|
ENG PLAN REVIEW CIVIL - No Comments
|
Building Review
|
Approved
|
|
09/23/2020
|
|
|
|
BLDG PLAN REVIEW - See DRT draft.
|