| Review Type |
Outcome |
Est. Completion Date |
Completed |
|
External Agency Review
|
No Comments
|
03/22/2024
|
04/10/2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
A second third-party review for the revised Wetland, Stream, Fish and Wildlife Habitat Assessment report and comment response has been completed and can be viewed and reviewed under "Documents & Images" under "Wetland 3rd Party Review letter PSE Cycle 2_012223". Address all third-party review comments and request for revisions.
1. Provide a table summarizing when DPs were evaluated and whether wetland hydrology indictors were observed.
2. Correctly label Wetland 1 rating forms
|
|
Engineering Traffic Review
|
No Comments
|
03/22/2024
|
03/21/2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
Please use 01.02.18 driveway detail for the western driveway approach unless necessary based on AutoTurn analysis. Our 35ft radius approach is intended for Arterials/Collectors with posted speeds 35mph or higher
A detailed Sight Distance Assessment at the intersection of Todd Road & 4th Street NW will be required with next submittal
When striping/channelization design is submitted during Civil Review, taper on the eastern frontage may require modification based on striping design/requirements.
During Civil review, roadway width will need to be verified (between face of curb). PSP site plans show slightly less than 34ft of width.
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
TIA Review Comments:
Trip generation assumptions are approved.
The 7th St NW/Valley Ave TWSC intersection is the only location that requires mitigation to return to pre-development conditions. During the PM peak, project trips increase delay from 41.3s (E) to 55.5s (F). However, please double check how this intersection has been coded in Synchro. Based on the HCM 7 report provided, this intersection was modeled with a 50ft WBL turn pocket. Currently, the WB approach has a center TWLTL that could be utilized for a two-step SBL movement. I suspect this change will bring the intersection into compliance. The other intersections operating below standards during AM/PM peak hour do not trigger mitigation per thresholds documented in our comprehensive plan.
|
|
Planning Review
|
No Comments
|
03/22/2024
|
03/20/2024
|
|
|
|
|
Fire Review
|
No Comments
|
03/22/2024
|
03/18/2024
|
|
|
|
|
Building Review
|
No Comments
|
03/22/2024
|
02/27/2024
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Review
|
No Comments
|
03/22/2024
|
02/08/2024
|
|
|
|
|
Planning Review
|
No Comments
|
01/30/2024
|
01/31/2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
Please provide additional details and clarity on if and how the Fire Department will use this facility for their training. In your response, please detail how the burn bit will be utilized and if the Fire Department will need to use non-water resources to put out the fires (i.e. any chemicals or foams). The SEPA checklist currently does not describe this potential use or burn pit. Update the SEPA checklist as appropriate (project description, air section, hazardous materials section, etc.). Depending on your responses, SEPA may need to be re-noticed to ensure that all agencies have a chance to review the full scope of the project.
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
Staff is assuming that the proposed multi-unit commercial / residential 4-plex and commercial / residential “village” use is for training purposes only and will be conditioned as such. If the project proposes to occupy these buildings for residential use or commercial use in addition to its training uses, a detailed explanation and updates to the SEPA checklist will be required.
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Per VMS 6.3.L, preliminary landscape plan shall identify all areas with existing or proposed grades of 15 percent or greater (Sheet L 1.1).
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Per VMS 6.3.M, preliminary landscape plan shall provide size and location of the proposes topographic features within the area to be landscaped such as berms or swales (Sheet L 1.1).
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Per VMS 6.3.L, preliminary landscape plan doesn't need to identify the specific tree type or individual shrubs and ground cover. The final landscape plan required at civil construction permit will need to comply with VMS 6.4. (Sheet L 1.1)
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Since the Type IIb landscape buffer is required to screen the outdoor storage use, screening shall still be provided even if interrupted by a wetland. Planning will review this with final landscape plan to ensure Type IIb screening is still provided (Sheet L 1.1)
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Pavement is required from the engineering and planning department. Per PMC 20.58.005, at least five percent of all paved areas landscaped. Provide calculations demonstrating compliance (Sheet L1.1)
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Per PMC 20.58, all trash contains shall be screened from abutting properties with substantial sight-obscuring landscaping or fencing and walls (Sheet L1.1).
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Per PMC 20.35.035.8, No use shall be permitted which creates annoying orders as to be perceptible, without instruments, at the boundaries of the lot. Provide a narrative describe burn pit use frequency, a description of intensity, generally what will be used to burn, etc. (Sheet CSD1)
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Missing pedestrian path shown on landscape plans. Update All civil plans.
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
Planning agrees that the vocational school parking standards apply to the project. It appears from your application materials that the proposed lab space is not included in your classroom calculations. It is likely that the lab space will need to be considered classroom space, but additional information is needed. Can you detail the maximum number of students will be onsite on any given day, will the classroom and lab space (include outdoor) be used be different group of "classes" on the same day (i.e. classroom is used at the same time as the labs are being used but by different group of students), any additional details you wish to provide regarding daily maximum use.
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
On building elevations, please indicate all proposed colors to ensure contrasting colors as detailed in your design review narrative.
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
As noted by the Engineering Review, the site plan is missing various site calculations. Planning will review the site calculations with your resubmittal to ensure compliance with PMC 20.35.
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
Per PMC 20.55.055, all off-street parking areas and access shall be paved unless approved by the city engineer. As such, all outdoor trainings area that will have vehicles drive on them or part will require to be paved unless you request and receive approval from the city engineer.
|
|
Engineering Traffic Review
|
Comments
|
01/30/2024
|
01/30/2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
As previously directed, an Alternative Methods Request (AMR) is required to be submitted/reviewed by City staff for the removal of code required frontage improvements along 4th Street NW.
Approved Traffic scoping worksheet included 8,600sqft of enclosed outdoor training areas. Current PSP submittal application identifies only 2,400sqft of enclosed outdoor training area. Also, the OTC building previously assumed 43,500sqft, now assumed to be 34,000sqft. Prior to next submittal, applicant must provide preliminary building designs for the City to evaluate current trip generation assumptions. The preliminary architectural drawings provided with PSP show all proposed structures as enclosed buildings.
Draft traffic analysis is currently under review by 3rd party traffic engineering consultant. Clarification on building sqft required (see above) prior to TIA review/approval.
Clearly identify ROW dedication assumptions on site plan
Provide roadway width dimension on updated PSP. This project must maintain 34ft of roadway width between face of curb.
Provide taper calculation for the eastern frontage design.
Commercial driveways need to be 30ft wide minimum. Use standard detail 01.02.18 for driveway design.
Autoturn analysis will be required to ensure the largest anticipated design vehicle can safely navigate site.
Detailed striping/channelization/signage design required during Civil Review
The intersection of Todd Rd & 4th St NW must comply with city standard 01.01.11 (approach sight distance).
For both driveways along frontage and the intersection at Todd Rd & 4th St NW, applicant must provide detailed entering & stopping sight distance analysis per City standards. Assume an 18ft setback from the edge of roadway based on the anticipated large vehicle accessing site. Analysis must identify and obstructions within sight triangle (trees, utility poles, signs, etc.)
ADA ramp on the south side of Todd Rd @ 4th St NW will need to be updated to meet current ADA requirements.
At the time of civil permit review provide a separate street lighting plan for the City to review.
Street lighting plan:
-City standard streetlights are required every 150ft along commercial frontage.
-City would prefer new streetlights to be installed on the south side of Todd Rd avoid overhead utility conflicts.
-If the applicant choses to install streetlights on the north side of Todd Rd, it is the sole responsibility of the design engineer to ensure streetlight design/placement is outside of the 10ft minimum “safe zone” area. The City will not allow streetlights to be within 10ft of the PSE primary for safety reasons.
-Streetlights shall have shorting caps installed with remote photocell located on the service cabinet.
-Utility pole mounted streetlights do not meet current City standards
Streetlight design shall provide the following:
-Provide details on how streetlights will be powered. City standard service cabinet required.
-Location of conduit runs and junction boxes per City standards
-Wiring Schedule including conduit size/type for each raceway
-Pole schedule including STA & offset for each luminaire
Coordinate with David Drake (Fire) on gate requirements.
Assume there will be no on-street parking allowed along frontage.
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
Please use 01.02.18 driveway detail for the western driveway approach unless necessary based on AutoTurn analysis. Our 35ft radius approach is intended for Arterials/Collectors with posted speeds 35mph or higher
A detailed Sight Distance Assessment at the intersection of Todd Road & 4th Street NW will be required with next submittal
When striping/channelization design is submitted during Civil Review, taper on the eastern frontage may require modification based on striping design/requirements.
During Civil review, roadway width will need to be verified (between face of curb). PSP site plans show slightly less than 34ft of width.
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
TIA Review Comments:
Trip generation assumptions are approved.
The 7th St NW/Valley Ave TWSC intersection is the only location that requires mitigation to return to pre-development conditions. During the PM peak, project trips increase delay from 41.3s (E) to 55.5s (F). However, please double check how this intersection has been coded in Synchro. Based on the HCM 7 report provided, this intersection was modeled with a 50ft WBL turn pocket. Currently, the WB approach has a center TWLTL that could be utilized for a two-step SBL movement. I suspect this change will bring the intersection into compliance. The other intersections operating below standards during AM/PM peak hour do not trigger mitigation per thresholds documented in our comprehensive plan.
|
|
Building Review
|
No Comments
|
01/30/2024
|
01/30/2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
1) EV Calculation shown on E1.01 require 7 spaces, only 6 EV parking shown on site plan.
General Comments:
• Building plans will need to be complete with all building, mechanical, plumbing, energy code items and accessibility requirements that may apply on the plans.
• The truss specs typically are required with the truss engineers’ stamps and a layout that matches the submitted plans at the time of submittal. Per your email request the Building Official, Ray Cockerham will allow deferred truss specifications for this project.
• Plans will need to be per the applicable codes 2018 adopted February 1, 2021 for all permits until March 14, 2024. As of now, March 15, 2024 all plans submitted will require the 2021 I-codes if adopted.
• All electrical is permitted by the Washington State Department of L & I.
• Accessible parking and access to the public way would be required as well as the accessibility requirements for inside the parking garage.
• For all accessible requirements the City of Puyallup adopted the 2018 IBC / WAC 51-50 and the ICC A117.1-2009 standard not the ADA.
• Review WAC51-50-0429 that takes effect March 15, 2024 (Section 429) for Electric vehicle charging infrastructure.
• Please reach out to me if I can answer any other questions in relationship to Building code items for this project. No other Building items at this time.
|
|
Engineering Review
|
No Comments
|
01/30/2024
|
01/25/2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Will the private on-site fire hydrant be used for training purposes? If yes, this will need to be metered.
|
|
|
See Document Markup
There appears to be 2 sets of existing contours. confirm correct set and remove the other.
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Per Preliminary Site Plan Checklist #1, show property's lot dimensions, boundaries, tax parcel numbers, and square footage. [Site Plan, Sheet CSD1]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Proposed utility pole and fire hydrant appear to be in conflict. [Site Plan, Sheet CSD1]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Offsite power poles symbol do not match symbol in legend. [Site Plan, Sheet CSD1]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
show existing and proposed power lines as shown in electrical Site Plan. [Site Plan, Sheet CSD1]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Note: At Civils, consider a Key Map organization and/or split each design sheet (TESC Plan, Site Plan, Horizontal Control Plan, Grading Plan, Drainage Plan, Utility Plan, Sewer Plan, etc) up into multiple sheets at 1"=20' or 1"=30'; use match lines. Plans and labels must be easily legible with no text conflicts. See COP standards for Key Map if used. [Site Plan, Sheet CSD1]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Note: At Civils, Review and follow all City Design standards. Appendix A checklist may be used to review plans. [Site Plan, Sheet CSD1]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Note: At Civils, make room on each sheet for engineering approval block as shown in section 1.0 of Design Standards. [Site Plan, Sheet CSD1]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Creating new outfalls into the ditch will not be acceptable. Discharge into existing manhole from the proposed catch basin or add a new manhole to the existing system and discharge perpendicular to the property line. [Site Plan, Sheet CSD1]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
full witdth and half width 2" Grind and Overlay required per design standards for Street Patch. See City of Puyallup Standard detail 01.01.20. [Site Plan, Sheet CSD1]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Note: At Civils, add a monument protection note. [Site Plan, Sheet CSD1]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Note: At Civils, add all General notes from each applicable section of City Design Standards. [Site Plan, Sheet CSD1]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Per Preliminary Site Plan Checklist #7(c) and stormwater feasibility requirements, Provide tabulation of all surface areas required to determine stormwater project thresholds. The City will provide a template upon request to ensure this requirement is met. [Site Plan, Sheet CSD1]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Per Preliminary Site Plan Checklist #7(f) and COP Design Standards Section 208.1, Garbage enclosure shall be covered with a yard drain connected to sewer. Call out location and show the sewer connection in this submittal. [Site Plan, Sheet CSD1]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
If Key Map is not used, put a thick dashed line around extents for Sheet CSD3 and freeze all elements within extents. [Site Plan, Sheet CSD1]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
show gate valve
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide grading cut/fill quantities. [Site Plan, Sheet CSD1]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
call out wetland on each sheet within its extents. [Site Plan, Sheet CSD1]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Per COP Preliminary Site Plan Checklist #2 , Show adjacent parcel, numbers, and zones. [Site Plan, Sheet CSD1]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Explain the intended use of the Containment Area. Locations that must contain petroleum derived wastes must pass through an oil/water separator connected to sewer. [Site Plan, Sheet CSD1]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
If vehicles will access under canopy, Undercanapy area will need to be hydraulically isolated with catchbasins connected to an oil/water separator and sewer.
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Gravel is not a permitted surface. [Site Plan, Sheet CSD1]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
AMR needed to document sewer main not extending full length. [Site Plan, Sheet CSD1]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Identify other wetlands and critical areas within 100 feet of site per preliminary site plan checklist #3. [Site Plan, Sheet CSD1]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
At Civils, show site specific inlet/outlet details for detention pond. [Site Plan, Sheet CSD1]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Need to know if this pipe is 0% or if pipe was sized to accommodate storage. this bioretenion basin appears to bypass detention. [Site Plan, Sheet CSD1]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
is this a topo line in the bioretention cell?
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Will DDCVA be installed here or in the building? Show vault for exterior installation Per COP details. [Site Plan, Sheet CSD1]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Label this slope with a slope arrow. [Site Plan, Sheet CSD1]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Ecology Manual requires 20-foot Detention pond setback from property line. [Site Plan, Sheet CSD1]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Clearly show ROW dedication at back of sidewalk. [Site Plan, Sheet CSD1]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
What is this symbol? [Site Plan, Sheet CSD1]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
What is this symbol? [Site Plan, Sheet CSD1]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Label training pit locations . [Site Plan, Sheet CSD1]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Design standards require a 10-foot public utility easement. [Site Plan, Sheet CSD1]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
For dry ponds with bottom widths of 15-feet or more, the access road shall extend to the pond
bottom to a minimum 25-foot long level pad to facilitate cleaning. [Site Plan, Sheet CSD1]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Access roads not to exceed 12%. roads steeper than 8% shall be paved using either asphalt concrete, cement concrete, cement treated base, or asphalt treated base. [Site Plan, Sheet CSD1]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add to an AMR the frontage determination for 4th Street NW. [Site Plan, Sheet CSD1]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
place sewer manhole 5 feet east of 4th st centerline. [Site Plan, Sheet CSD1]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Note: At Civils, provide onsite sewer and storm profiles for each pipe reach. [Site Plan, Sheet CSD1]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Note: At Civils, add proposed street gutter profile to profile views. [Site Plan, Sheet CSD1]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Is this a restroom? Label all buildings and their uses. [Site Plan, Sheet CSD3]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Note: at Civils, Provide Utility crossing table and clearly label each crossing. City standard detail 03.01.03 shows crossing standards. [Site Plan, Sheet CSD3]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Are these valves in the Utility Village connected to something? [Site Plan, Sheet CSD3]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Confirm the"Pretend" utilities will be functioning utilities or not. [Site Plan, Sheet CSD3]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Note:At Civils, Given the complexity of the utility village, enlarge this detail at least 1'=10' scale or more for legibility of utilities. Use multiple sheets if necessary to cleary show detail. [Site Plan, Sheet CSD3]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Show all pit locations How much volume of water will be used for fire training purposes? [Site Plan, Sheet CSD3]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
How much volume of water will be used for fire training purposes and what will the frequency of training be? [Site Plan, Sheet CSD3]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Will there be chemical retardants used during fire training? [Site Plan, Sheet CSD3]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Place sewer manhole 5 feet northwest of 7th Street NW. [Site Plan, Sheet CSD4]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
show minimum cover depths. [Site Plan, Sheet CSD7]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
At time of civil permit, show all existing and proposed utilities and their crossings in all profile views. [Site Plan, Sheet CS8]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Blow off shall be located at back of sidewalk. [Site Plan, Sheet CS8]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Show water air relief valve at high points. [Site Plan, Sheet CS8]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
show water valves on plans where applicable per standards. [Site Plan, Sheet CS8]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Show water air relief valve at high points. [Site Plan, Sheet CS8]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Per WSDOT Jason Dao, P.E. Utility Project Support and Accommodations Engineer:???? ???????? ???? ?? ?? ?? ???????? ? ??? ?? ?? ????? ??????? ?????? ???????????? ??? ????? ?? ???????? ??? ?????? ????????? ??? ???? ????? ?? ? ????????? ????????????? ???? ????? ?? ??? ????????? ???????? ??? ?? ??? ??? ??? ????? ???????????? ???? ??? ?????? ?????? ????? ????? ???? ?? ?????? ??? ????? ?????? ??????? ??? ???????? ???? ??????? ?????????? ?? ??? ????? ?? ?? ???? ?? ?????? ??????? ???????? ???????? ?? ??? ???????????? ??????????? ?????? ???? ????? ??? ???????? ?? ????? ???????? ????? ????? ????? ????
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Bioretention is next to steep slope. Line the bottom with a low permeability or impermeable liner or consider alternative treatment options. Bioretention systems that are lined do not count towards LID BMPs, only treatment criteria. [Site Plan, Sheet CSD12]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
What is the material for the bottom of pond? Pond bottom should be designed to restrict ground water from entering pond. At time of Civil permit, provide buoyancy calculations and structural calculations of detention pond. [Site Plan, Sheet CSD12]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
At time of Civil Permit, provide pond East West pond section in addition to South-North Section. [Site Plan, Sheet CSD12]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Note At Civils: provide site specific sections for each bioretention area showing ground water elevations. Add COP Standard detail for bioretenion. [Site Plan, Sheet CSD12]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Confirm on the detail the bioretention design is compliant with COP Design Standard section 202.3. and bioretention detail 02.07.01. [Site Plan, Sheet CSD12]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Pavement sections to be reviewed at civil submittal. [Site Plan, Sheet CSD12]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Will an Industrial General Stormwater Permit be required? [Site Plan, Sheet CSD3]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Label as N Meridian (SR 161) [Site Plan, Sheet CS8]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
PLPSP20230096
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide and cite AMR for no 4th street improvements. [Storm Report, Page 7]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Page 37 of the report states Bioretention will not be used for infiltration, but this section says it will. Revise to correlate with the rest of the report. [Storm Report, Page 7]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Expand soils narrative to include calculated design infiltration rate (Ksat) for permeable pavement. [Storm Report, Page 8]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
The project must discharge into adjacent existing storm network. Outfalls already exist where the project is proposing outfalls. Additional outfalls will not be allowed. [Storm Report, Page 9]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Move this sentence to MR 2. [Storm Report, Page 12]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Garbage enclosures shall follow city Standard section 208.1. They must be covered with a roof to hydraulically isolate from rain and yard drain to sewer. [Storm Report, Page 13]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
need more detail. [Storm Report, Page 14]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Doesn't count toward LID requirements if used only for treatment. Cite in-feasibility criteria for not infiltrating. [Storm Report, Page 14]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
This is for the offsite basin which must be considered apart from the onsite basin. cite in-feasibility criteria from Manual for not using permeable pavement onsite. [Storm Report, Page 14]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Consider off-site list separately from on-site list [Storm Report, Page 14]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Follow and provide Ecology Manual flow chart for determining wetland protection level requirements. Then document how the determined requirements will be met.
[Storm Report, Page 15]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
O&M Manual not required until Civils. [Storm Report, Page 15]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Cite the section in the Ecology Manual that supports modeling proposed vegetation areas where there is existing gravel surface as imperious in pre-developed conditions. Section 1-3.4.7:Flow Control Performance Standard requires all area match forested pre-developed conditions with two exceptions that do not appear to be applicable to this site. [Storm Report, Figure 7]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
See previously related comment on Figure 7 . Use forested conditions for all predeveloped areas or Cite where the Manual offers other alternative predevleped land conditions for achieving flow control standard. Confirm citation with review engineer prior to submitting [Storm Report, Page 29]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
The WWHM report should clarify whether the treatment percentage is for off-line or on-line flows. [Storm Report, Page 29]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Make adjustments to narrative as needed to address comment on Figure 7. [Storm Report, Page 29]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Model all predeveloped area as forested per Ecology Manual. See comment on Figure 7 for more details. [Storm Report, Page 32]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
The predeveloped basin accounts for the devloped basin permeable sidewalk.
Remove the area equivalent to the permeable sidewalk.
The total predeveloped areas should equal the total developed areas per model. [Storm Report, Page 33]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Infiltration rate must be determined based on infiltrations testing. Grain size calculations will meet Ecology requirements if soils are identified as being unconsolidated by glacial till. [Storm Report, Page 42]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Pipe capacity is not required until Civils and was not verified. [Storm Report, Page 45]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Will there be a fueling station onsite? [Storm Report, CARA report, Page 7]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Will there be a fueling station onsite? Fueling stations should be covered for hydrologic isolation [Storm Report, Geotech report]
|
|
External Agency Review
|
Comments
|
01/30/2024
|
01/24/2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
A second third-party review for the revised Wetland, Stream, Fish and Wildlife Habitat Assessment report and comment response has been completed and can be viewed and reviewed under "Documents & Images" under "Wetland 3rd Party Review letter PSE Cycle 2_012223". Address all third-party review comments and request for revisions.
1. Provide a table summarizing when DPs were evaluated and whether wetland hydrology indictors were observed.
2. Correctly label Wetland 1 rating forms
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
SEPA Public and Agency Comments: Washington State Department of Ecology provided standards comments, which you can view under "Documents & Images." No other comments have been received.
|
|
Fire Review
|
No Comments
|
01/30/2024
|
01/02/2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
1. All electronic gates will require Opticon for fire department access. Add notes to each gate.
2. Show fire lane dimensions on site plan.
|
|
Planning Review
|
Comments
|
11/16/2023
|
11/16/2023
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
Please provide additional details and clarity on if and how the Fire Department will use this facility for their training. In your response, please detail how the burn bit will be utilized and if the Fire Department will need to use non-water resources to put out the fires (i.e. any chemicals or foams). The SEPA checklist currently does not describe this potential use or burn pit. Update the SEPA checklist as appropriate (project description, air section, hazardous materials section, etc.). Depending on your responses, SEPA may need to be re-noticed to ensure that all agencies have a chance to review the full scope of the project.
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
Staff is assuming that the proposed multi-unit commercial / residential 4-plex and commercial / residential “village” use is for training purposes only and will be conditioned as such. If the project proposes to occupy these buildings for residential use or commercial use in addition to its training uses, a detailed explanation and updates to the SEPA checklist will be required.
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Per VMS 6.3.L, preliminary landscape plan shall identify all areas with existing or proposed grades of 15 percent or greater (Sheet L 1.1).
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Per VMS 6.3.M, preliminary landscape plan shall provide size and location of the proposes topographic features within the area to be landscaped such as berms or swales (Sheet L 1.1).
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Per VMS 6.3.L, preliminary landscape plan doesn't need to identify the specific tree type or individual shrubs and ground cover. The final landscape plan required at civil construction permit will need to comply with VMS 6.4. (Sheet L 1.1)
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Since the Type IIb landscape buffer is required to screen the outdoor storage use, screening shall still be provided even if interrupted by a wetland. Planning will review this with final landscape plan to ensure Type IIb screening is still provided (Sheet L 1.1)
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Pavement is required from the engineering and planning department. Per PMC 20.58.005, at least five percent of all paved areas landscaped. Provide calculations demonstrating compliance (Sheet L1.1)
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Per PMC 20.58, all trash contains shall be screened from abutting properties with substantial sight-obscuring landscaping or fencing and walls (Sheet L1.1).
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Per PMC 20.35.035.8, No use shall be permitted which creates annoying orders as to be perceptible, without instruments, at the boundaries of the lot. Provide a narrative describe burn pit use frequency, a description of intensity, generally what will be used to burn, etc. (Sheet CSD1)
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Missing pedestrian path shown on landscape plans. Update All civil plans.
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
Planning agrees that the vocational school parking standards apply to the project. It appears from your application materials that the proposed lab space is not included in your classroom calculations. It is likely that the lab space will need to be considered classroom space, but additional information is needed. Can you detail the maximum number of students will be onsite on any given day, will the classroom and lab space (include outdoor) be used be different group of "classes" on the same day (i.e. classroom is used at the same time as the labs are being used but by different group of students), any additional details you wish to provide regarding daily maximum use.
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
On building elevations, please indicate all proposed colors to ensure contrasting colors as detailed in your design review narrative.
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
As noted by the Engineering Review, the site plan is missing various site calculations. Planning will review the site calculations with your resubmittal to ensure compliance with PMC 20.35.
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
Per PMC 20.55.055, all off-street parking areas and access shall be paved unless approved by the city engineer. As such, all outdoor trainings area that will have vehicles drive on them or part will require to be paved unless you request and receive approval from the city engineer.
|
|
Engineering Traffic Review
|
Comments
|
11/16/2023
|
11/16/2023
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
As previously directed, an Alternative Methods Request (AMR) is required to be submitted/reviewed by City staff for the removal of code required frontage improvements along 4th Street NW.
Approved Traffic scoping worksheet included 8,600sqft of enclosed outdoor training areas. Current PSP submittal application identifies only 2,400sqft of enclosed outdoor training area. Also, the OTC building previously assumed 43,500sqft, now assumed to be 34,000sqft. Prior to next submittal, applicant must provide preliminary building designs for the City to evaluate current trip generation assumptions. The preliminary architectural drawings provided with PSP show all proposed structures as enclosed buildings.
Draft traffic analysis is currently under review by 3rd party traffic engineering consultant. Clarification on building sqft required (see above) prior to TIA review/approval.
Clearly identify ROW dedication assumptions on site plan
Provide roadway width dimension on updated PSP. This project must maintain 34ft of roadway width between face of curb.
Provide taper calculation for the eastern frontage design.
Commercial driveways need to be 30ft wide minimum. Use standard detail 01.02.18 for driveway design.
Autoturn analysis will be required to ensure the largest anticipated design vehicle can safely navigate site.
Detailed striping/channelization/signage design required during Civil Review
The intersection of Todd Rd & 4th St NW must comply with city standard 01.01.11 (approach sight distance).
For both driveways along frontage and the intersection at Todd Rd & 4th St NW, applicant must provide detailed entering & stopping sight distance analysis per City standards. Assume an 18ft setback from the edge of roadway based on the anticipated large vehicle accessing site. Analysis must identify and obstructions within sight triangle (trees, utility poles, signs, etc.)
ADA ramp on the south side of Todd Rd @ 4th St NW will need to be updated to meet current ADA requirements.
At the time of civil permit review provide a separate street lighting plan for the City to review.
Street lighting plan:
-City standard streetlights are required every 150ft along commercial frontage.
-City would prefer new streetlights to be installed on the south side of Todd Rd avoid overhead utility conflicts.
-If the applicant choses to install streetlights on the north side of Todd Rd, it is the sole responsibility of the design engineer to ensure streetlight design/placement is outside of the 10ft minimum “safe zone” area. The City will not allow streetlights to be within 10ft of the PSE primary for safety reasons.
-Streetlights shall have shorting caps installed with remote photocell located on the service cabinet.
-Utility pole mounted streetlights do not meet current City standards
Streetlight design shall provide the following:
-Provide details on how streetlights will be powered. City standard service cabinet required.
-Location of conduit runs and junction boxes per City standards
-Wiring Schedule including conduit size/type for each raceway
-Pole schedule including STA & offset for each luminaire
Coordinate with David Drake (Fire) on gate requirements.
Assume there will be no on-street parking allowed along frontage.
|
|
External Agency Review
|
Comments
|
11/16/2023
|
11/15/2023
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
A third-party review for the “Wetland, Stream, Fish and Wildlife Habitat Assessment: PSE Todd Road” report has been completed and can be viewed and reviewed under "Documents & Images". Address all third-party review comments and request for revisions. Review your SEPA checklist and update as necessary prior to resubmittal.
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
SEPA Public and Agency Comments: Washington State Department of Ecology provided standards comments, which you can view under "Documents & Images." No other comments have been received.
|
|
Fire Review
|
Comments
|
11/16/2023
|
11/15/2023
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
1. All electronic gates will require Opticon for fire department access. Add notes to each gate.
2. Show fire lane dimensions on site plan.
|
|
Engineering Review
|
Comments
|
11/16/2023
|
11/15/2023
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Will the private on-site fire hydrant be used for training purposes? If yes, this will need to be metered.
|
|
|
See Document Markup
There appears to be 2 sets of existing contours. confirm correct set and remove the other.
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Per Preliminary Site Plan Checklist #1, show property's lot dimensions, boundaries, tax parcel numbers, and square footage. [Site Plan, Sheet CSD1]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Proposed utility pole and fire hydrant appear to be in conflict. [Site Plan, Sheet CSD1]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Offsite power poles symbol do not match symbol in legend. [Site Plan, Sheet CSD1]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
show existing and proposed power lines as shown in electrical Site Plan. [Site Plan, Sheet CSD1]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Note: At Civils, consider a Key Map organization and/or split each design sheet (TESC Plan, Site Plan, Horizontal Control Plan, Grading Plan, Drainage Plan, Utility Plan, Sewer Plan, etc) up into multiple sheets at 1"=20' or 1"=30'; use match lines. Plans and labels must be easily legible with no text conflicts. See COP standards for Key Map if used. [Site Plan, Sheet CSD1]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Note: At Civils, Review and follow all City Design standards. Appendix A checklist may be used to review plans. [Site Plan, Sheet CSD1]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Note: At Civils, make room on each sheet for engineering approval block as shown in section 1.0 of Design Standards. [Site Plan, Sheet CSD1]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Creating new outfalls into the ditch will not be acceptable. Discharge into existing manhole from the proposed catch basin or add a new manhole to the existing system and discharge perpendicular to the property line. [Site Plan, Sheet CSD1]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
full witdth and half width 2" Grind and Overlay required per design standards for Street Patch. See City of Puyallup Standard detail 01.01.20. [Site Plan, Sheet CSD1]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Note: At Civils, add a monument protection note. [Site Plan, Sheet CSD1]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Note: At Civils, add all General notes from each applicable section of City Design Standards. [Site Plan, Sheet CSD1]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Per Preliminary Site Plan Checklist #7(c) and stormwater feasibility requirements, Provide tabulation of all surface areas required to determine stormwater project thresholds. The City will provide a template upon request to ensure this requirement is met. [Site Plan, Sheet CSD1]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Per Preliminary Site Plan Checklist #7(f) and COP Design Standards Section 208.1, Garbage enclosure shall be covered with a yard drain connected to sewer. Call out location and show the sewer connection in this submittal. [Site Plan, Sheet CSD1]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
If Key Map is not used, put a thick dashed line around extents for Sheet CSD3 and freeze all elements within extents. [Site Plan, Sheet CSD1]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
show gate valve
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide grading cut/fill quantities. [Site Plan, Sheet CSD1]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
call out wetland on each sheet within its extents. [Site Plan, Sheet CSD1]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Per COP Preliminary Site Plan Checklist #2 , Show adjacent parcel, numbers, and zones. [Site Plan, Sheet CSD1]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Explain the intended use of the Containment Area. Locations that must contain petroleum derived wastes must pass through an oil/water separator connected to sewer. [Site Plan, Sheet CSD1]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
If vehicles will access under canopy, Undercanapy area will need to be hydraulically isolated with catchbasins connected to an oil/water separator and sewer.
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Gravel is not a permitted surface. [Site Plan, Sheet CSD1]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
AMR needed to document sewer main not extending full length. [Site Plan, Sheet CSD1]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Identify other wetlands and critical areas within 100 feet of site per preliminary site plan checklist #3. [Site Plan, Sheet CSD1]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
At Civils, show site specific inlet/outlet details for detention pond. [Site Plan, Sheet CSD1]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Need to know if this pipe is 0% or if pipe was sized to accommodate storage. this bioretenion basin appears to bypass detention. [Site Plan, Sheet CSD1]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
is this a topo line in the bioretention cell?
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Will DDCVA be installed here or in the building? Show vault for exterior installation Per COP details. [Site Plan, Sheet CSD1]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Label this slope with a slope arrow. [Site Plan, Sheet CSD1]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Ecology Manual requires 20-foot Detention pond setback from property line. [Site Plan, Sheet CSD1]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Clearly show ROW dedication at back of sidewalk. [Site Plan, Sheet CSD1]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
What is this symbol? [Site Plan, Sheet CSD1]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
What is this symbol? [Site Plan, Sheet CSD1]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Label training pit locations . [Site Plan, Sheet CSD1]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Design standards require a 10-foot public utility easement. [Site Plan, Sheet CSD1]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
For dry ponds with bottom widths of 15-feet or more, the access road shall extend to the pond
bottom to a minimum 25-foot long level pad to facilitate cleaning. [Site Plan, Sheet CSD1]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Access roads not to exceed 12%. roads steeper than 8% shall be paved using either asphalt concrete, cement concrete, cement treated base, or asphalt treated base. [Site Plan, Sheet CSD1]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Add to an AMR the frontage determination for 4th Street NW. [Site Plan, Sheet CSD1]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
place sewer manhole 5 feet east of 4th st centerline. [Site Plan, Sheet CSD1]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Note: At Civils, provide onsite sewer and storm profiles for each pipe reach. [Site Plan, Sheet CSD1]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Note: At Civils, add proposed street gutter profile to profile views. [Site Plan, Sheet CSD1]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Is this a restroom? Label all buildings and their uses. [Site Plan, Sheet CSD3]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Note: at Civils, Provide Utility crossing table and clearly label each crossing. City standard detail 03.01.03 shows crossing standards. [Site Plan, Sheet CSD3]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Are these valves in the Utility Village connected to something? [Site Plan, Sheet CSD3]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Confirm the"Pretend" utilities will be functioning utilities or not. [Site Plan, Sheet CSD3]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Note:At Civils, Given the complexity of the utility village, enlarge this detail at least 1'=10' scale or more for legibility of utilities. Use multiple sheets if necessary to cleary show detail. [Site Plan, Sheet CSD3]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Show all pit locations How much volume of water will be used for fire training purposes? [Site Plan, Sheet CSD3]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
How much volume of water will be used for fire training purposes and what will the frequency of training be? [Site Plan, Sheet CSD3]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Will there be chemical retardants used during fire training? [Site Plan, Sheet CSD3]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Place sewer manhole 5 feet northwest of 7th Street NW. [Site Plan, Sheet CSD4]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
show minimum cover depths. [Site Plan, Sheet CSD7]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
At time of civil permit, show all existing and proposed utilities and their crossings in all profile views. [Site Plan, Sheet CS8]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Blow off shall be located at back of sidewalk. [Site Plan, Sheet CS8]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Show water air relief valve at high points. [Site Plan, Sheet CS8]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
show water valves on plans where applicable per standards. [Site Plan, Sheet CS8]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Show water air relief valve at high points. [Site Plan, Sheet CS8]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Per WSDOT Jason Dao, P.E. Utility Project Support and Accommodations Engineer:
"SR161 Crossing Todd Rd NW at milepost 30.44 is in WSDOT managed access right-of-way and [City of Puyallup has permit authority for Todd Road] so a franchise accommodation with WSDOT is not required. However, due to the gas and sewer installation near the bridge piers, WSDOT would like to review the plans (plan, section and profile) with offsets dimensions to the piers as we want to ensure there’s adequate distance to the substructure foundation" (Email from Jason Dao provided in Docs& Images). [Site Plan, Sheet CS8]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Bioretention is next to steep slope. Line the bottom with a low permeability or impermeable liner or consider alternative treatment options. Bioretention systems that are lined do not count towards LID BMPs, only treatment criteria. [Site Plan, Sheet CSD12]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
What is the material for the bottom of pond? Pond bottom should be designed to restrict ground water from entering pond. At time of Civil permit, provide buoyancy calculations and structural calculations of detention pond. [Site Plan, Sheet CSD12]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
At time of Civil Permit, provide pond East West pond section in addition to South-North Section. [Site Plan, Sheet CSD12]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Note At Civils: provide site specific sections for each bioretention area showing ground water elevations. Add COP Standard detail for bioretenion. [Site Plan, Sheet CSD12]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Confirm on the detail the bioretention design is compliant with COP Design Standard section 202.3. and bioretention detail 02.07.01. [Site Plan, Sheet CSD12]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Pavement sections to be reviewed at civil submittal. [Site Plan, Sheet CSD12]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Will an Industrial General Stormwater Permit be required? [Site Plan, Sheet CSD3]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Label as N Meridian (SR 161) [Site Plan, Sheet CS8]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
PLPSP20230096
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Provide and cite AMR for no 4th street improvements. [Storm Report, Page 7]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Page 37 of the report states Bioretention will not be used for infiltration, but this section says it will. Revise to correlate with the rest of the report. [Storm Report, Page 7]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Expand soils narrative to include calculated design infiltration rate (Ksat) for permeable pavement. [Storm Report, Page 8]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
The project must discharge into adjacent existing storm network. Outfalls already exist where the project is proposing outfalls. Additional outfalls will not be allowed. [Storm Report, Page 9]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Move this sentence to MR 2. [Storm Report, Page 12]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Garbage enclosures shall follow city Standard section 208.1. They must be covered with a roof to hydraulically isolate from rain and yard drain to sewer. [Storm Report, Page 13]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
need more detail. [Storm Report, Page 14]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Doesn't count toward LID requirements if used only for treatment. Cite in-feasibility criteria for not infiltrating. [Storm Report, Page 14]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
This is for the offsite basin which must be considered apart from the onsite basin. cite in-feasibility criteria from Manual for not using permeable pavement onsite. [Storm Report, Page 14]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Consider off-site list separately from on-site list [Storm Report, Page 14]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Follow and provide Ecology Manual flow chart for determining wetland protection level requirements. Then document how the determined requirements will be met.
[Storm Report, Page 15]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
O&M Manual not required until Civils. [Storm Report, Page 15]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Cite the section in the Ecology Manual that supports modeling proposed vegetation areas where there is existing gravel surface as imperious in pre-developed conditions. Section 1-3.4.7:Flow Control Performance Standard requires all area match forested pre-developed conditions with two exceptions that do not appear to be applicable to this site. [Storm Report, Figure 7]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
See previously related comment on Figure 7 . Use forested conditions for all predeveloped areas or Cite where the Manual offers other alternative predevleped land conditions for achieving flow control standard. Confirm citation with review engineer prior to submitting [Storm Report, Page 29]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
The WWHM report should clarify whether the treatment percentage is for off-line or on-line flows. [Storm Report, Page 29]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Make adjustments to narrative as needed to address comment on Figure 7. [Storm Report, Page 29]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Model all predeveloped area as forested per Ecology Manual. See comment on Figure 7 for more details. [Storm Report, Page 32]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
The predeveloped basin accounts for the devloped basin permeable sidewalk.
Remove the area equivalent to the permeable sidewalk.
The total predeveloped areas should equal the total developed areas per model. [Storm Report, Page 33]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Infiltration rate must be determined based on infiltrations testing. Grain size calculations will meet Ecology requirements if soils are identified as being unconsolidated by glacial till. [Storm Report, Page 42]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Pipe capacity is not required until Civils and was not verified. [Storm Report, Page 45]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Will there be a fueling station onsite? [Storm Report, CARA report, Page 7]
|
|
|
See Document Markup
Will there be a fueling station onsite? Fueling stations should be covered for hydrologic isolation [Storm Report, Geotech report]
|
|
Building Review
|
Comments
|
11/16/2023
|
11/14/2023
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other/Miscellaneous
Comments:
1) EV Calculation shown on E1.01 require 7 spaces, only 6 EV parking shown on site plan.
General Comments:
• Building plans will need to be complete with all building, mechanical, plumbing, energy code items and accessibility requirements that may apply on the plans.
• The truss specs typically are required with the truss engineers’ stamps and a layout that matches the submitted plans at the time of submittal. Per your email request the Building Official, Ray Cockerham will allow deferred truss specifications for this project.
• Plans will need to be per the applicable codes 2018 adopted February 1, 2021 for all permits until March 14, 2024. As of now, March 15, 2024 all plans submitted will require the 2021 I-codes if adopted.
• All electrical is permitted by the Washington State Department of L & I.
• Accessible parking and access to the public way would be required as well as the accessibility requirements for inside the parking garage.
• For all accessible requirements the City of Puyallup adopted the 2018 IBC / WAC 51-50 and the ICC A117.1-2009 standard not the ADA.
• Review WAC51-50-0429 that takes effect March 15, 2024 (Section 429) for Electric vehicle charging infrastructure.
• Please reach out to me if I can answer any other questions in relationship to Building code items for this project. No other Building items at this time.
|
